Fiscal Year 1999 FisalYer 99 (1 Ocoe 199 - 0 Setm Part 1 of 2 ( 1 o DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 0 1 AUG 2000 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable Albert Gore, Jr. President of the Senate Washington, D.C. 20510-0010 Dear Mr. President: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1999, in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1998, and September 30, 1999. Sincerely, Joseph W. Westphal Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 0 1 AUG 2000 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable J. Dennis Hastert Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515-6501 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1999, in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1998, and September 30, 1999. Sincerely, Joseph W. Westphal Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter North Atlantic Division New England, MA, District ................ New York, NY, District ................ Philadelphia, PA, District ............... . Baltimore, MD, District ................ Norfolk, VA, District ................ South Atlantic Division Wilmington, NC, District Charleston, SC, District Savannah, GA, District Jacksonville, FL, District Mobile, AL, District Mississippi Valley Division New Orleans, LA, District Vicksburg, MS, District Memphis, TN, District St. Louis, MO, District Rock Island, IL, District St. Paul, MN, District Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ............... Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Pittsburgh, PA, District Ohio River Buffalo, NY, District Detroit, MI, District Chicago, IL, District Nashville, TN, District Louisville, KY, District Huntington, WV, District 1-1 2-1 3-1 4-1 5-1 6-1 7-1 8-1 9-1 10-1 11-1 12-1 13-1 14-1 15-1 16-1 17-1 18-1 19-1 20-1 21-1 22-1 23-1 24-1 25-1 . . . . . . . . " " " "! " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT * The New England District comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (Continued) 1. Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA............... 1-3 2. Boston Harbor, MA ........................ 1-3 3. Cape Cod Canal, MA ................................. 1-3 4. Cocheco River, NH .............................. 1-4 5. Cohassett Harbor, MA ..................... . 1-4 6. Fivemile River, CT .................................... 1-5 7. Green Harbor, MA........................................ 1-5 8. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI ............. 1-5 9. Hyannis Harbor, MA.................................... 1-5 10 Little Harbor, NH .......................... ......... 1-6 11. Newburyport Harbor, MA............................ 1-7 12. Portland Harbor, ME ................................... 1-7 13. Providence River and Harbor, RI ................ 1-7 14. Salem Harbor, MA ......................... 1-8 15. Seekonk River, Providence, RI .............. 1-8 16. Sesuit Harbor, MA ................................... 1-8 17. W ells Harbor, M E ......................................... 1-9 Beach Erosion Control 18. Point Beach, Milford, CT ............................. 1-9 19. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT .................... 1-9 20. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects ....... ............................. 1-10 Flood Control 21. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI....... 1-10 22. Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME ......... 1-10 23. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI ......... 1-10 23A. West Hill Dam, MA ................................. 1-11 24. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ............................. 1-11 25. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT ....................................... 1-11 25A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ........................... 1-12 25B. Barre Falls Dam, MA ................................. 1-12 25C. Birch Hill Dam, MA ................................... 1-12 25D. Colebrook River Lake, CT.......................... 1-13 25E. Conant Brook Dam, MA ........................... 1-13 25F. Knightville Dam, MA ...................... 1-13 25G. Littleville Lake, MA ............................ 1-13 25H. North Hartland Lake, VT ................... 1-13 251. North Springfield Lake, VT ...................... 1-13 25J. Otter Brook Lake, NH................................ 1-14 25K. Surry Mountain Lake, NH......................... 1-14 25L. Townshend Lake, VT ................................. 1-14 25M. Tully Lake, MA................................... 1-14 25N. Union Village Dam, VT.............................. 1-14 26. Faulkner Island, CT ............................ 1-15 27. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI ............................... 1-15 28. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA ........ 1-15 28A. Black Rock Lake, CT .................................. 1-15 28B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ..................... 1-15 28C. Hop Brook Lake, CT ................................... 1-16 28D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT .................. 1-16 28E. Thomaston Dam, CT ................................. 1-16 29. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ....... 1-16 29A. Blackwater Dam, NH ................................. 1-17 29B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ................... 1-17 29C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ............................ 1-17 29D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH .................. 1-17 29E. North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA ........ 1-18 30. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ............................ 1-18 31. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI .................... 1-18 32. Roughans Point, Revere, MA..................... 1-18 33. Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA ... 1-19 34. Saint John River Basin, ME ...................... 1-19 35. Stamford, CT ....................................... 1-19 36. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA....... 1-19 36A. Buffumville Lake, MA .......................... 1-20 36B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ........................... 1-20 36C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ................ .. 1-20 36D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ....................... 1-20 36E. West Thompson Lake, CT ....................... 1-20 36F. W estville Lake, MA ................................. 1-21 1-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Page Tables 37. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA .. 1-21 38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... .. 1-21 39. Flood Control Reservoir Operations .......... 1-22 40. Hurricane Barrier Operations ................... 1-22 41. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.............................. 1-22 General Investigations 42. 43. 44. 45. Surveys ..................................... 1-23 Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 1-23 Planning, Engineering and Design ........... 1-23 Preconstruction Engineering and Design ..................................... 1-23 Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ........... 1-24 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 1-33 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................... 1-38 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .............. 1-42 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 1-43 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power .. 1-45 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ..................... 1-46 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 .................... 1-49 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ...................... 1-49 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ....................... 1-49 Table 1-K Emergency Bank Protection Activities Pursuant to Sec. 14 .......................... 1-49 Table 1-L Environmental Improvement Activities Pursuant to Sec. 1135 ..... 1-50 Table 1-M Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Activities Pursuant to Sec. 206 ....... 1-50 Tablel-N Blackstone River Basin............... 1-50 Table 1-0 Connecticut River Basin ............. 1-51 Table 1-P Housatonic River Basin .................. 1-53 Table 1-Q Merrimack River Basin ................ 1-54 Table 1-R Thames River Basin ................. 1-55 Table 1-S Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................... 1-57 1-2 Flood Control (Continued) Page NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Navigation 1. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA Location. Aunt Lydia's Cove is located in Chatham Harbor, Chatham, Massachusetts. The cove is approximately 90 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts on the "elbow" of Cape Cod. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a length of 900 feet, and a 9.5 acre anchorage also to a depth of 8 feet. This work was completed in June 1995. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The Chatham Municipal Fish Pier is the only terminal facility in Aunt Lydia's Cove. Initially constructed in 1945, the pier is used to offload catch, access boats, load supplies and perform some repairs. Two independent fish companies lease space at the pier's main packing facility where fish are offloaded, packed in ice and shipped to various distributors. The pier provides diesel fuel, gasoline, parking and restroom facilities. Transient and recreational boaters use the pier for loading, offloading, and refueling. This facility is adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging was awarded November 17, 1994. Work began in December 1994 and was completed in June 1995. Final contract amount was $777,251. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $8,000 were incurred for work on an evironmental assessment in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel. 2. BOSTON HARBOR, MA Location. Boston Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13270 and 13272.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project. Completed work at Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 ofAnnual Report for 1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 with the construction of the Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on February 13, 1998 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Port Authority for the new work. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non- Federal sponsor must pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; reimburse an additional ten percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas); relocate utilities necessary for construction of the project; and deepen berthing areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in the harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth- Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging was awarded May 18, 1998. Work began in August 1998 and was about 80 percent complete at FY end. Contractor earnings totalled $9,410,000 for improvement work. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in conjunction with improvement work. Contractor earnings for maintenance work totalled $17,652,800 at FY end. Work included dredging of confined aquatic disposal cells beneath the Mystic River Channel for disposal of unsuitable material. 3. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from the head of Buzzards Bay, MA, easterly to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of the East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. 1-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Cape Cod Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for local work. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. The seventh terminal is the State pier, which is owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and is located on the north bank of the canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost of operation and maintenance work at the Cape Cod Canal totalled $10,169,365. Costs include $1,325,000 for vessel traffic control activities; $1,250,000 for maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities; $825,000 for operation and maintenance of recreational facilities; $310,583 for operation and maintenance of the Buzzards Bay Railroad Bridge; $475,000 for project administration facilities; $214,000 for project utilities; $67,300 for maintenance of roads and bridges; $67,000 for periodic inspections; $69,500 for general real estate activities; $152,310 for inspection of the Bourne Highway Bridge; and $415,434 to prepare plans and specifications for major rehabilitation of the Buzzards Bay Railroad Bridge. A contract to paint the Sagamore Bridge was awarded September 14, 1998. Work began in December 1999 and was about 95 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $2,363,5000. 4. COCHECO RIVER, NH Location. The Cocheco River is located about 9 miles northwest of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Existing project. Provides for a 7 foot tidewater channel 60 to 75 feet wide (7.5 feet deep and 50 feet wide in rock), extending from the confluence of the Cocheco and Piscataqua Rivers to the head of navigation at the Upper Narrows in Dover, New Hampshire. Work was completed in 1906. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The channel is used primarily by recreational craft based at a marina located near the head of the waterway. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel were $3,300 for completion of a settling test initiated last FY on the material to be dredged and $3,400 for final payment for evaluations provided by the Waterways Experiment Station (WES). Hired labor costs included $13,400 for work on an environmental assessment, $10,500 for project coordination, $8,300 for borings at the proposed upland disposal area, and $300 for project coordination. 5. COHASSETT HARBOR, MA Location. Cohasset Harbor is located along the shore of Massachusetts Bay, about 16 miles southeast of Boston Harbor and 37 miles northwest of the eastern entrance to Cape Cod Canal. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart, 3269.) Existing project. Provides for entrance channel 8 feet deep and 90 feet wide, and an 18 acre anchorage area, 7 feet deep in the inner harbor. This work was completed in July 1960. Three additional anchorage areas; 6 feet feep with 3.9 acres in Cohasset Cove, 3.3 acres in the Government Island area and 5.4 acres in Bailey Creek; were constructed under Section 107 and completed in April 1968. Rock was encountered and survey of the area was completed. Rock removal is still pending. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has provided an 8-foot channel, 6-foot anchorage basin and 800-foot breakwater. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 10 wharves in the harbor, 2 of which are open to the public, and 5 are equipped with marine railways. They are considered adequate for present harbor activities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging under a continuing contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel and anchorage was stopped on February 15, 1999 due to an environmental restriction to protect fish spawning in the harbor. The allowable dredging period was September 1 to February 15. About 40,000 cubic yards of material were dredged this FY and placed in the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site (MBDS) at a cost of $353,000. Dredging is expected to commence again in November 1999 and be completed by February 15, 2000. Costs incurred for a deep-water capping demonstration project under the DAMOS program were $39,100. Hired labor costs associated with dredging included $57,400 for supervision and inspection, $42,000 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, $2,100 for project coordination and management, and $500 for contract processing Work under this contract included maintenance and improvement dredging of town areas performed as work for others in association with the Federal work. Reimbursable costs for this effort included $52,000 for contract processing. 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 6. FIVEMILE RIVER HARBOR, CT Location. Fivemile River Harbor is located on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 41 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart, 12364.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the mouth of Fivemile River extending upstream about 5,300 feet. This work was completed in 1910. The upper 700 feet of the original project, which was never constructed, was deauthorized in October 1978. Mean range of tide is 7.2 feet, and extreme range due to effects of wind and other causes is 12 feet. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are several small wharves and piers which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel was awarded in February 1999. Dredging was performed from March 1 to May 14, 1999. The dredging window, October 1 to May 30, was established to protect shellfish. A total of 48,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a contract cost of $680,000. Material dredged from the lower portion of the channel was disposed of at the Western Long Island Sound Disposal Site, and material dredged from the upper portion was disposed of at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site. Sampling and biological testing was performed by contract at a cost of $79,300. Hired labor cost included $60,800 for supervision and inspection, $20,300 for performing and plotting pre-and after-dredge surveys, $6,200 for administering sampling and testing, $4,400 for plans and specifications, $2,400 for project coordination and management, and $2,200 for contract administration. 7. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. Green Harbor is located on the west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1995. Constructionwas completed in October 1969. Portion of project deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1999. (See Table 1- B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from April 29 to May 30,1999 at a plant rental cost of $324,400. Dredging was restricted to November 1 to June 1 in order to protect juvenile lobsters at the disposal site. A total of 36,005 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off of Green Harbor Beach. Hired labor costs of $14,100 were incurred for performing and plotting pre-and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys, and $900 for project coordination and management. 8. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. The Block Island Harbor of Refuge is located on the east side of Block Island, about 13 miles southwest from Point Judith Harbor, RI, and about 25 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Completed in 1916 except for dredging of two 15-foot anchorages in the outer harbor west of the entrance channel, which were deauthorized in November 1986. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are two wharves in the harbor, both steel sheet pile bulkhead which comprise southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf, owned by town and open to public, is considered inadequate for present general needs of boating in harbor. There is limited room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $17,400 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications in association with maintenance dredging proposed to be performed next FY. 9. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. Hyannis Harbor is located along the south shore of Cape Cod, about 16 miles west of Chatham, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13237.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1992. New work involves deepening the Federal channel and basin to 13 feet; realigning the entrance channel through the outer Harbor to straighten the approach and eliminate two difficult turns; 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 and widening the channel to 240 feet from the outer Harbor through most of Lewis Bay and to 220 feet from the upper reach of Lewis Bay to the entrance of the Inner Harbor. New work was completed in March 1999. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on November 13, 1997 between the Corps and the Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority for the new work. The project sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to 10 percent of total General Navigation Features (GNF) costs; repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction, an additional 10 percent of total GNF costs partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations; provide 10 percent of the cost to construct dredged material disposal facilities necessary for maintenance of the project; and provide and maintain all berthing areas and local access channels commensurate with project features. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Due to the limited environmental window for dredging work, construction was carried out in two phases. Phase I construction, consisting solely of improvement dredging of the realigned entrance channel, was completed in March 1998. A contract for Phase II construction was awarded August 19, 1998. Work began in September 1998 and was completed in March 1999. Phase II consisted of deepening the channel and basin to 13 feet and channel widening. Maintenance and municipal berth dredging was performed in conjunction with this work. The northeastern and northern corners of the inner harbor basin were not deepened or maintained. Sandy dredged materials were used to nourish adjacent beaches and for shorebird nesting habitat restoration on Dunbar Point. Silty dredged materials from the upper channel reach and inner harbor were disposed of in a confined aquatic disposal (CAD) cell dredged beneath the abandoned former entrance channel reach in the outer harbor, and capped with clean sands removed from adjacent channel reaches. Environmental resource concerns limited work in the outer harbor and beaches to the period September 1 and April 1 due to shellfish, anadromous fish, sea turtles, and nesting shorebirds, including the listed piping plover. Dredging activity in Lewis Bay was further restricted due to winter flounder. Construction of the CAD cell was initiated in September 1998 and completed in December 1998, with a total of 141,000 cubic yards removed. Of this total, about 38,800 cubic yards were pumped to Great Island and 102,200 cubic yards were pumped to Dunbar Point. The CAD cell excavation was allocated as follows: 60,000 cubic yards to Federal improvement, 47,000 cubic yards to Federal maintenance, and 29,000 cubic yards to non-Federal work for others. Silty materials from the inner harbor were removed by bucket dredge and transported to the CAD cell by scow from December 1998 to March 1999. A total of 71,600 cubic yards of material, including 26,400 cubic yards of maintenance, 28,700 cubic yards of improvement, and 16,500 cubic yards of municipal berth material removed under a work-for-others agreement for the town of Barnstable, were dredged and placed in the CAD cell. About 37,000 cubic yards of clean sand was removed from adjacent channel reaches and used to cap the CAD cell. About 1,500 cubic yards of peat and stump deposits were removed from the channel opposite the jetty as part of the improvement, and were also placed in the CAD cell. An additional 53,000 cubic yards of clean sand were removed from the channel, of which 21,000 cubic yards were Federal maintenance and 32,000 cubic yards were Federal improvement dredging. Of this material, 27,000 cubic yards were placed on the beaches of West Yarmouth, and 26,000 cubic yards were pumped onto Dunbar Point. Materials removed by truck from Dunbar Point to free site capacity and assure specified final site elevations and slopes was distributed as follows: 28,200 cubic yards to Hyannis South Beach, 21,000 cubic yards to Kalmus South Beach, 7,400 cubic yards to Veterans Memorial Beach and 7,700 cubic yards to Bayview Street Beach. Costs for improvement dredging under Phase II totalled $2,028,426 with final payment pending at FY end. The Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority provided the non-Federal share of improvement project costs including channel improvements and the improvement portion of disposal facilities. The Town of Barnstable and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management provided the full cost of dredging and disposal for associated municipal berth dredging under the terms of a Memorandum of Agreement, which totalled $361,565. Maintenance: Maintenance costs for this FY totalled $829,000 for a total maintenance cost of $1,041,500. Final contract close-out is still pending. Hired labor costs for maintenance this FYincluded $54,500 for supervision and inspection, $33,500 for performing and plotting predredge surveys, and $4,000 for project coordination and management. The Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management provided the non-Federal share of the maintenance portion of disposal facility costs, which totalled $39,033. 10. LITTLE HARBOR, NH Location. Little Harbor is located on the west side of Portsmouth Harbor between New Castle Island and the 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Portsmouth Harbor between New Castle Island and the New Hampshire mainland. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1976. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One dock owned by Wentworth Hotel, but not available to public. Tentative State plans include a small boat landing and shore facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $6,800 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications associated with proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel. 11. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. Newburyport Harbor is located at the mouth of the Merrimac River, about 4 miles south of the Massachusetts and New Hampshire state line and 48 miles north of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13282.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1994. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Marinas, a yacht club, public landings, and a commercial fish pier extend along the south bank of the Merrimac River below Route 1 highway bridge, and one town pier and four marinas are located on the north side of the river, Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel was awarded in May 1999. Dredging was performed by contract hopper dredge from July 28 to August 16, 1999. No environmental window was required for this work. A total of 145,017 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off of Plum Island at a contract cost of $450,532. Hired labor costs included $20,500 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $28,600 for supervision and inspection, $21,300 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, $3,600 for project coordination and management, and $2,500 for contract processing. 12. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME Location. Portland Harbor is located on the southwestern coast of Maine, about 100 miles northeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13292.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1978. Project was completed in 1966, except for ledge removal that was completed in 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, of which 4 are not used. Seven wharves are publicly owned, 4 by the U.S. Government, 2 by State of Maine, and 1 by city of South Portland. Mechanical-handling facilities are available at 24 wharves. Railroad connections have been made to 27 of them. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging under a continuing contract awarded at the end of last FY commenced on November 16, 1998. Work was suspended by the contractor on December 18,1998 and resumed on March 5, 1999. Dredging was completed on April 8, 1999. A total of 409,700 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of at the Portland Disposal Site at a cost of $2,139,000. The dredging window, November 1 to April 30, was established to protect lobsters in the area. Final contract payment was pending at the close of the FY. Hired labor costs included $126,000 for supervision and inspection, $67,000 for performing and plotting pre and after-dredge surveys, $10,000 for project coordination and management, and $1,000 for contract processing. 13. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI Location. The Providence River originates in Providence, RI at the junction of two small streams, the Woonasquatucket and Moshassuck Rivers. It then flows southerly about a mile to the head of Providence Harbor at Fox Point where it is joined by the Seekonk River and continues southerly another 8 miles to Narragansett Bay. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13224 and 13225.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1936, and 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 16.8 miles long and 40 feet deep, generally 600 feet wide from deep water in Narragansett Bay just south of Prudence Island Light to the turn below Field Point at Providence, thence up to 1,700 feet wide to Fox Point. The existing 40-foot channel was completed in January 1976. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Dredging of a 30- foot channel, 150 feet wide from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River was deauthorized in November 1986. Local cooperation. Assurances have been received. However, local interests have yet to provide berthing areas commensurate to channel depths. Terminal facilities. There are 27 water terminal 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 facilities serving port of Providence, RI. Three-fourths of all facilities have railway connections. Four facilities are owned by city of Providence and two by the State of Rhode Island. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost incurred for various contracts associated with the Environmental Impact Statement addressing proposed maintenance dredging of the 40-foot Federal channel were $144,268 for various studies including organizing draft EIS comments, researching temperature refuge issues, analysis of Rhode Island Sound fisheries data, lobster sampling, and land use assessment; $75,263 for sediment sampling for erosion and consolidation testing $65,787 for subsurface explorations; $55,068 for sediment sampling and biological testing for proposed CAD sites; $143,000 for current measurements; $158,897 for Phase I archaeology survey; $24,800 for dredging impacts modeling; $45,000 for WES centrifuge consolidation testing; $90,000 for flume and erosion testing; $87,000 for WES disposal site modeling; $20,000 for economic assessment of commercial/recreational fishing impacts; and $14,100 for EIS editing and printing. Hired labor costs included $276,400 for preparation of Draft Environmental Impact Statement, $14,900 for the administration of contract sampling and testing, $38,000 for project coordination and management, $2,900 for coordination meetings, $3,900 for audio/visual support, and $7,900 for contract processing. 14. SALEM HARBOR, MA Location. Salem Harbor is located on the north shore of Massachusetts Bay, about 12 miles north of the entrance to Boston Harbor. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 240 and 1207.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report of 1915. Existing project. Channel 32 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide, widened to 400 feet at bends and at inner end, extending about 1.5 miles from deep water in outer harbor to a point about 1,500 feet from Salem Terminal wharf, where it joins locally dredged approach channel of same depth leading to wharf. Project also provides for a channel 10 feet deep in South River, 300 feet wide at 10- foot depth in harbor, gradually narrowing to 200 feet at a point opposite outer end of Derby Wharf, thence 150 feet wide to a bend at outer end of Derby Wharf, thence 90 feet wide to turn near inner end of Derby Wharf, and thence 50 feet wide to upstream end of Pickering Wharf, for a branch channel on east side of Derby Wharf, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 700 feet long, widening into a basin of south same depth, 500 feet long and 200 feet wide. Existing project was completed in November 1967. (See Table l-B forActs authorizing existingproject.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Extensively developed waterfront of Salem Harbor, including South River, is about 1 mile in extent and owned by private interests; of the nine wharves in the area, Salem Terminal, the largest, serves New England Power Co. generating station, and as principal terminal for receipt and distribution of coal and petroleum products in Salem and tributary area; two belong to National Park Service, and one of these is being used by the Navy for a training center. Nine other wharves in harbor are outside of extensively developed area. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Work this FY consisted of investigations in preparation for maintenance dredging of the Federal channels and support to the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management in their preparation of a Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) for Salem Harbor. A cost of $89,000 was incurred this FY on a contact for sampling and testing of channel sediments. Hired labor costs included $11,300 for administration of sampling and testing, and $2,000 for contract processing. 15. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI Location. The India Point Railroad Bridge is located at the mouth of the Seekonk River in Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the removal of the abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge at a currently estimated cost of $1,300,000. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Local sponsors must transfer title of the bridge to the United States and provide 50 percent of construction costs. Revenue derived from the sale of scrap from the bridge shall be credited toward the non- Federal share of project costs. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications continued along with coordination with the Rhode Island State Historic Preservation Office to identify measures to mitigate for the removal of this historic bridge. 16. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13250.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club, thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B for 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT in August 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscalyear. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from May 31 to June 10, 1999 at a plant rental cost of $86,000. A total of 15,820 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed east of the entrance channel in a nearshore area off of Cold Storage Beach. Hired labor costs of $10,600 were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge surveys and progress surveys. An environmental window of June 1 to January 30 was established to protect winter flounder. 17. WELLS HARBOR, ME Location. Wells Harbor is located in the town of Wells at the mouth of the Webhannet River, about 20 miles northeast of Portsmouth Harbor, NH and about 34 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13286.) Previous project. For description of previous project, see Annual Report for 1991. This project was completed in April 1967. Existing project. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1999 made substantial changes to project features. The modifications conformed to an agreement betweenthe project's Sponsors (Towns of Wells and State of Maine) and the intervenors in the State review process on the proposed maintenance of the project (Maine Audubon society, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State resource agencies, local businesses and shorefront property owners). The project's proximity to the Rachael Carson National Wildlife Refuge and Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve (WNERR) had generated opposition to continued project maintenance from State and Federal resource agencies and environmental interest. Local citizens and business groups had intervened in favor of the project. WRDA1999 modified the project as follows: shift the 6- foot inner harbor access channel, at 80 feet wide, to the west side of the harbor where the most important local landing is located; redesignate the existing east side channel and easterly portions of the settling basin as a 6- foot anchorage, 5.6 acres in size; deauthorize narrow areas along the east and west sides of the inner harbor project features to permit construction of a municipal marina; and relocate the settling basin to the outer harbor between the shore arms of the jetties. WRDA1999 also contains a provision authorizing the US Fish & Wildlife Service to accept enforcement rights over a conservation easement placed on a large intertidal sand bar occupying the central portion of the inner harbor. Under the terms of the easement, a 4.7-acre portion of the new 6-foot anchorage and the remaining areas of the original inner harbor settling basin could not be dredged. The purposedofthis easement is to prevent the dredging of areas considered critical habitat by the Maine Audubon Society. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local c operation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf of pile and timber construction on the north side of the anchorage. Facility is owned and operated by the town of Wells and is considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs incurred this FY in preparation for maintenance dredging of the modified Federal project were $150 for a sampling and testing contract, $10,400 for initiation of plans and specifications, $700 for administration of sampling and testing, and $400 for contract processing. Beach Eroision Control 18. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. The city of Milford is located in southcentral Connecticut along the northern shore of Long Island Sound. Point Beach is a residential subdivision located in Milford about 75 miles northeast of New York City and 10 miles southwest of New Haven, Connecticut. Existing project. The proposed project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and backshore residential structures above the estimated 100 year flood elevation. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on January 14, 1997 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor must pay 35 percent of all costs allocated to storm damage reduction, assume all costs above the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000 and assume all costs for the maintenance and repair of the project after completion. This agreement is being amended to reflect increased Federal cost limitation of $3,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Initiated efforts to update project plans and specifications. 19. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of Woodmont, City of Milford about five miles southwest of New Haven, CT and some 82 miles northeasterly of New York City. Existing project. The original project provided for Federal participation in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection and improvement of those portions of the shore which are publicly owned, by widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first pocket beach west of Merwin Point; widening to a width of 100 - 150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson Avenue; and construction of five impermeable groins 300 to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see Annual Report for 1961.) Work authorized in March 1992 provided for the direct placement ofsandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach between Clinton and Bonsilene Street to form a berm 50 feet wide, reconstruction of the Usher Road/Dunbar Street and Bonsilene Street groins, and mitigation to replace rocky habitat for blue mussels lost as a result of sand placement. This work was completed in 1994. New work involves periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year economic life of the project. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. In accordance with the Local Cooperation Agreement signed May 18, 1992 between the Corps and the City of Milford, the project sponsor must pay 35 percent of the total cost of periodic beach nourishment. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for renourishment of Woodmont Beach was awarded June 29, 1999. Contractor could not locate source of suitable beach renourishment material and work had not begun by FY end. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS No beach inspections were conducted in FY 1999. Flood Control 21. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI Location. Allendale Dam is located along the Woonasquatucket River which forms the boundary line between the towns of North Providence and Johnston, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the reconstruction of Allendale Dam. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. The project sponsor must obtain title to the Allendale Dam; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for project construction; pay 25 percent of project costs; and assume all costs for the operation and maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: During FY 1998 we were alerted by EPA of possible contamination of sediments behind the dam. The RI Department of Environmental Management has requested we postpone further efforts until they conduct a risk assessment and make appropriate recommendations. 22. AROOSTOOK RIVER, FORT FAIRFIELD, ME Location. The town of Fort Fairfield is located in northern Maine along the border with New Brunswick, Canada, about 140 miles northeast of Bangor, Maine. The central business district is located along the south side of the Aroostook River in downtown Fort Fairfield. Existing project. Provides for the construction of approximately 2,800 linear feet of earthen dike and concrete floodwall along the south side of the Aroostook River to protect the central business district of Fort Fairfield from future ice jam flooding. The project also includes construction of a pumping station to remove interior drainage, along with environmental and cultural resource mitigation measures involving planting shrubs over a 5,000 square foot area and relocation of an historic railroad station. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on May 25, 1999 between the Corps and the town of Fort Fairfield, Maine. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, easement, rights-of-way, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of project costs to 35 percent (a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to construct the project was awarded July 8, 1999. Work began in August 1999 and was about five percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $157,000. 23. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 23A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 24. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1995. Land acquisition was completed in 1990. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project surveillance and inspection, as well as land use administration were $205,959. 25. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of ten reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT; Conway, MA; Huntington, MA; Charlestown, NH; North Stratford, NH; Colchester, CT; Middletown, CT; Milford, CT; Simsbury, CT; and two projects in Leominster, MA authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (See Table 1-M at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. This work was completed in February 1993. 25A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is two miles north of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1994. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Cost of work was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Connecticut River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to replace guard rails was awarded July 1, 1997. Work began late September 1997 and was completed in November 1997. Final contract amount was $113,994. 25B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace gate operators and stems was awarded June 9, 1999. Contract ordered materials but had not begun work by FY end. 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Location. Damsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation' facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair pavement, guardrails and drains was awarded September 21, 1998. Work began in April 1999 and was completed in August 1999. Contractor earnings totalled $339,218 with final contract payment pending at FY end. 25E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated inAugust 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25G. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 apply and were fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 25H. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repave roads and parking areas at North Hartland Lake and Franklin Falls Dam was awarded August 24, 1998. Work began in October 1998 and was completed in December 1998. Final contract amount was $270,933, of which $122,941 was for work at North Hartland Lake. 251. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 provement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25J. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25K. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25L. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about two miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizating legislation, see Annual Report for 1994. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system for flood control in Connecticut River Basin. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969 and secondary phase completed in September 1971. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair and paint the spillway bridge was awarded June 18, 1998. Work began in October 1998 and was completed the next month. Final contract amount was $144,400. 25M. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 25N. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 26. FAULKNER ISLAND, CT Location. Faulkner Island is located in Long Island Sound about 3 miles south of Guilford, Connecticut. Faulkner Lighthouse is located about 35 feet from the cliff edge along the eastern side of the island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of shoreline protection measures along the east side of the island adjacent to Faulkner Lighthouse. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed September 14, 1998, between the Corps and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The island is owned and operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a National Wildlife Refuge. In accordance with the MOU, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must agree to maintain the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued preparation of plans and specifications. 27. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI Location. Galilee Salt Marsh is located in southern Rhode Island in the town of Narragansett about 30 miles south of Providence, between Point Judith Harbor of Refuge and Bluff Hill Cove. Existing project. Provides for installing two culverts beneath Escape Road and excavating channels to restore about 34 acres of former salt marsh. This area was degraded by the disposal of dredged material from the Federal navigation project at Point Judith Harbor of Refuge. Project was completed in August 1997. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to restore Galilee Salt Marsh was awarded August 13, 1996. Work began in October 1996 and was substantially completed in August 1997. Final contract amount was $1,172,589. 28. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 28A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repave roads at Black Rock and Northfield Brook Lakes was awarded August 25, 1998. Work began in April 1999 and was completed the following month. Contractor earnings totalled $149,465, of which $104,526 was for work at Black Rock Lake. Final contract payment was still pending at FY end. A contract for various dam and bridge repairs at Black Rock Lake and Thomaston Dam was awarded June 10, 1999. Work began is September 1999 and was about 35 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of$150,000, of which about $50,000 was for work at Black Rock Lake. 28B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 28C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 28D. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repave roads at Back Rock and Northfield Brook Lakes was awarded August 25, 1998. Work began in April 1999 and was completed the following month. Contractor earnings totalled $149,465, of which $44,939 was for work at Northfield Brook Lake. Final contract payment was still pending at FY end. 28E. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract for various dam and bridge repairs at Black Rock Lake and Thomaston Dam was awarded June 10, 1999. Work began in September 1999 and was about 35 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $150,000, of which about $100,000 was for work at Thomaston Dam. 29. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. Emergency streambank protection projects at Amesbury, MA, two in Leominster, MA and two in Lancaster, MA were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 29A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 29B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 29C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repave roads and parking areas at Franklin Falls Dam and North Hartland Lake was awarded August 24, 1998. Work began in October 1998 and was completed in December 1998. Final contract amount was $270,933, of which $147,992 was for work at Franklin Falls Dam. A contract of repair Dyer and Beaver Brook Bridge was awarded August 20, 1998. Work began in November 1998 and was completed in January 1999. Final contract amount was $72,250. A contract to replace Smith River Bridge was awarded August 15, 1998. Work began in November 1998 and completed in July 1999. Contractor earnings totalled $347,420 with final contract payment pending at FY end. 29D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 29E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LANCASTER, MA Location. The Town of Lancaster is located in Worcester County in north central Massachusetts, approximately 40 miles west of Boston, Massachusetts and 18 miles north of Worcester, Massachusetts. The erosion site is along the North Nashua River adjacent to State Highway Route 70. Existing project. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed September 29, 1999 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction; pay an additional cash contribution during construction so that the total contribution including lands equals 35 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $1,000,000; and bear all costs for maintenance and repair of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Prepared plans and specifications for emergency streambank protection measures. 30. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operations and maintenance activities were conducted. 31. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI Location. Quonset Point is located in east central Rhode Island along the west shore of Narragansett Bay in the village of Davisville and Town of North Kingstown, about 15 miles south of Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of two elevated water storage towers and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line. Construction of the water towers was completed in September 1998 and work on the sewer line was completed in July 1998. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed January 29, 1997 between the Corps and the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation. The sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas, and shall perform or ensure performance of all relocations necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project. The sponsor must also provide 25 percent of construction costs and assume all costs in excess of the Federal limitations of $1,350,000 for construction of the two elevated water storage towers and $1,050,000 for sewer line relocation. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct two elevated water storage towers was awarded May 7, 1997. Work began in August 1997 and was completed in Septemer 1998. Contractor earnings totalled $1,875,000 with final payment pending at FY end. A contract to relocate about 6,000 feet of sewer line was awarded May 7, 1997. Work began in September 1997 and was completed in July 1998. Final contract amount was $789,499. 32. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes. Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the shoreline. The revetment will extend from a point about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The project also calls for "backwater" protection by raising the ground elevation one foot at the intersection of Bennington Street and State Road and installing a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed April 25, 1997 between the Corps and 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements; pay an amount in cash to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct the stone revetment project was awarded September 17, 1997. Work began in December 1997 and was substantially complete by FY end except for minor punch list items. Contractor earnings totalled $7,554,040 with final payment pending at FY end. 33. SAGAMORE MARSH, CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. Sagamore Marsh is located in southeastern Massachusetts in the towns of Bourne and Sandwich, approximately 50 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. The marsh lies on the north side of the Cape Cod Canal, near the canal's east end. Existing project. Provides for enlarging culverts beneath Scussett Beach and Cape Cod Canal Service Roads, installing sluice gates and excavating channels to increase tidal flows and restore about 50 acres of salt marsh and estuarine habitat. Tidal flushing of Sagamore Marsh was restricted in the 1930s when the Cape Cod Canal was widened. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on September 22, 1999 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of study and project costs including lands to 25 percent; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Completed preparation of project plans and specifications. 34. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Location. The project is located in Aroostook county in northern Maine, and lies within the Saint John River Basin. Existing project. The project involves a research and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for a two-year research and demonstration program was signed on April 22, 1991 between the Corps and the Maine Aroostook Water and Soil Management Board. The project sponsor must obtain all interests in real estate as determined by the Government and the project sponsor to be necessary for project implementation. The Government will reimburse the project sponsor 65 percent of project costs as work is accomplished, up to the Federal cost limit of $300,000. The LCA was amended on June 6, 1994 to include a third year of research and demonstration at an estimated Federal cost of $252,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued research at the University of Maine's farm in Presque Isle, Maine. 35. STAMFORD, CT Location. The Stamford Hurricane Barrier is located in Fairfield County on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1974. Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the navigation gate hoist system was awarded April 11, 1995. The gate hoist system was delivered to the site in June 1996 and installation was completed in August 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $1,361,096 with final payment pending at FY end. 36. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P on reservoirs and local protection projects, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 36A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 36C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate Hodges Village Dam was awarded August 5, 1997. Work began in October 1997 and was about 95 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $16,261,500. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair the spillway bridge was awarded June 24, 1999. Work began in August 1999 and was about half complete by FY end with contractor earnings of $100,000. 36F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 37. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Project provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1998) is $40,800,000, and includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. Total project costs do not include dam safety measures at Old Quincy Dam, which are estimated at $9,000,000 and are a non-Federal responsibility. Construction of Town River improvements was completed in December 1994. Construction of the tunnel was completed in January 1997. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway; pay all cost for dam safety measures at Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements. In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of the tunnel was awarded September 15, 1993. Work on this contract began in January 1994 and was completed in January 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $23,503,070 with final payment pending at FY end. A contract for reconstruction of Old Quincy Dam was awarded September 25, 1998. Work began in February 1999 and was about 40 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $3,890,000. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: August 99- Ansonia, Derby, Stamford; September 99 - Colchester, East Hartford, Hartford, New London, Torrington. MAINE: (None) MASSACHUSETTS: April99 - Chicopee, Fitchburg, Gardner, Three Rivers, West Springfield; May99 - Charles River, Lancaster; June 99- Holyoke; July 99 - Leominster (Bypass), Leominster (Sewer Line), Ware, West Warren. NEW HAMPSHIRE: September 99 - Charlestown. tRHODE ISLAND: July 99 - Fox Point Barrier; September 99 - Burrillville. VERMONT: September99- Brownville, Rockingham. 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 39. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of flood control dams, all of which have flood control as primary storage available with recreation and/or water supply as secondary storages in most of the projects, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During FY 1999 there were three significant flood events; January, March, and September 1999. During January 1999 a storm system deposited 1 to 2 inches of rainfall over southern New England watersheds. Corresponding runoff, augmented by some snowmelt, caused the Ware River, Massachusetts, to rise to near flood stage. The second flood event occurred in March 1999 when 1 to 3 inches of rainfall occurred causing the Westfield River in Massachusetts and the Naugatuck River in Connecticut to rise to flood stage. The third flood event occurred in September 1999 as a result of tropical storm Floyd depositing 4 to 8 inches of rain fall over New England watersheds, with some areas within Connecticut receiving over 9 inches. Rivers exceeded flood stage in the Naugatuck Basin as well as some tributaries of the mainstem Connecticut and Merrimack Rivers. Cumulative damages prevented, due to flood control operations at NAE reservoirs, totalled $28,201,000 during FY 1999. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe and kayak activities occurred during FY 1999 at Otter Brook in March and April; Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and Knightville in April; Ball Mountain and Townshend in April and September. Releases for hydropower from Colebrook Lake during non-flood periods of FY 1999 were controlled by the Hartford MDC. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater Dam was regulated for canoe races in April and May 1999. NAUGATUCK RIVER BASIN Thomaston Dam provided low flow augmentation during the summer months of FY 1999 in support of the City of Waterbury, CT construction activities to their Wastewater Treatment Plant downstream. THAMES RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe and kayak activities occurred during FY 1999 at East Brimfield and Westville in April; and at Mansfield Hollow Lake in June. East Brimfield also supplied small releases for low flow augmentation to American Optical Co. during the summer months. 40. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- Fairhaven, MA barriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on 9 occasions for coastal storms and hurricanes during FY 1999. Total benefits associated with gate operations during FY 1999 totalled $100,000. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During FY 1999, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 17 different occasions resulting in a total of $462,000 in benefits. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was operated on one occasion during FY 1999; however, no benefits were computed as tides did not reach damaging levels. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. No operations occurred at the Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier during FY 1999, as tides did not reach damaging levels. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1999, as tides did not reach damaging levels 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. (None) Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT (preauthorization). (See Table 1-K) Project modifications for the improvement of the environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-L) Aquatic ecosystem restoration activities pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). (See Tabel 1 - M) Emergency flood control activities--repair,f lood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY were $37,580 for disaster preparedness and $426,997 for emergency operations. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Costs for the FY for surveys from regular funds were $840,400 of which $26,310 was for two flood damage prevention studies; $419,919 for five special studies; and $394,171 for coordination studies. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The District Engineer is the U.S. member on the Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and basic hydrologic information is compiled. A report of operations and development in the basin was prepared in cooperation with Canadian counterparts. Total costs for the FY were $11,971. Total costs to September 30, 1999 are $377,290. Concerns about fluctuating water levels on Spednik and East Grand Lakes and its adverse effects on fisheries and recreation were raised at two public meetings held by the International Joint Commission (IJC) in August 1992. These lakes are currently operated in conjunction with downstream hydropower facilities. The IJC has requested that the Saint Croix River Board of Control reexamine the Orders of Approval for Spednik and East Grand Lakes. A range of lake levels and minimum flow releases will be studied to assist the IJC in developing new operational procedures for these lakes which increase recreational opportunities, enhance the environment and improve water level and flow regulation. Total costs for FY were $4,500. Total costs to September 30, 1999 are $108,719. The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment was established in 1989 under an agreement signed by the Governors of Maine, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and the Premiers of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The Council was tasked under this agreement to develop consistent policies, initiatives and programs designed to protect and conserve the shared natural resources of the Gulf of Maine. In April 1993, the Council requested the New England District Engineer to participate in this international program as an "observer" to the Council. In this capacity, the District Engineer is expected to attend Council meetings and support their initiatives to the extent possible. In addition to the District Engineer's direct participation, a representative of the Corps is a member of the Working Group to the Council, which implements directives of the Council. The Corps representative on the Working Group is assisting the Habitat Sub-Group to establish policies, set priorities and identify lead agencies for implementing habitat restoration projects in the Gulf of Maine. This effort includes investigating potential habitat restoration sites eligible for Corps participation under Section 1135 and coordination of input from other Federal agencies. Total costs for the FY were $12,168. Total costs to September 30, 1999 are $101,414. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the FY were $431,857. Total costs to September 30, 1999 are $9,963,972. The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop a base of information for use in future planning and design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 1999 funds were used to conduct hydrologic analysis of the 1987 flood within the Merrimack River Basin. Total costs for the FY were $14,534. Total costs to September 30, 1999 are $109,295. 44. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (None.) 45. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were $1,378 for work on the Rochester, NH stormwater management project. 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30,1999 1. Aunt Lydia's Cove Chatham, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 2. Boston Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 3. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 4. Cocheco River, NH 5. Cohasset Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 28,921 94,674 13,200 13,200 40,183 -88,000 -41,606 1,377 7,951 9,000 43,800 43,000 65,000 1,113,798 74,295 1,107,484 9,000 8,066 12,804 850 66,000 65,066 184,019 104,813 62,700 62,250 97,000 553,000 5,135,000 4,084,000 35,128,974 3 102,804 155,021 2,490,178 4,649,350 32,651,523 3 206,087 167,564 16,090,100 2,575,358 29,638,649 4 215,052 137,468 5,215,744 12,790,344 28,949,116 4 - 1,260,000 - 254,603 90,000 2,055,000 34,917 212,510 2,004,000 1,820,258 2,838,775 3,612,692 3,264,000 2,074,862 4,983,775 3,860,119 - 21,798,322 1,2 - 21,798,322 1,2 7,324,656 9,833,620 7,322,857 9,637,583 7,137,492 10,172,000 170,560,882 7,463,679 10,169,365 170,498,023 - 115,432 - 115,432 - 390,677 - 390,677 - 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 - 119,089 - 119,089 601,920 74,215 23,343 23,234 4,474 4,474 16,300 490,115 630,000 616,778 142,587 -14,000 39,278 665,059 664,447 267,737 267,737 483,000 1,574,142 494,105 1,571,916 61,261 43,500 43,500 142,587 61,261 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 6. Fivemile River, CT 7. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 8. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI 9. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 10. Little Harbor, NH 11. Newburyport Harbor, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 117,421 117,316 731 731 31,400 27,054 - 35,490 - 35,490 853,000 1,237,021 855,582 1,235,153 - 254,512 - 254,512 240,848 222,026 240,924 222,028 85,670 86,450 1,620 1,620 279,400 279,549 350,600 4,810,738 350,007 4,809,946 - - 158,341 - - 158,341 - - 576,856 - - 576,856 - 17,000 2,845,024 - 17,383 2,845,021 160,000 155,000 1,770,000 1,600,000 4,213,921 145,899 187,745 1,726,077 1,648,401 4,212,804 55,000 10,810 53,000 12,674 231,200 227,621 - 732,500 - 161,218 - 127,500 - 330 - 367,900 - 3,025 23,000 22,818 919,000 2,152,863 921,930 2,152,078 87,300 241,128 -27,300 49,341 134,800 399,361 129,757 129,757 1,191,128 773,673 100,200 49,671 502,700 402,386 - 133,227 - 133,227 26,500 426,636 26,347 426,193 12,963 13,302 565,224 565,224 348,364 341,195 -8,026 -170 1,900 1,900 555,800 6,862,130 554,784 6,861,114 1,415,524 1,415,524 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 (Contributed Funds, Other) 12. Portland Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) 13. Providence River and Harbor, RI 14. Salem Harbor, MA 15. Seekonk River, Providence, RI 16. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 17. Wells Harbor, ME Contributed Funds) Contributed Funds-Other) 18. Point Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Contrib. Cost New York Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 78,000 2,357 80,357 80,357 80,357 9,588,710 9,588,710 212,467 176,556 146,916 242,054 -90,000 -30,000 51,395 72,000 2,376,500 10,948,239 65,189 2,381,751 10,946,626 60,000 2,751 54,146 25,417,022 25,417,022 281,447 910,518 282,039 888,071 5,036 5,036 20,980 19,795 - 650,000 7,355 45,161 132,000 132,587 62,745 62,741 605,500 1,321,900 7,982,922 606,319 1,334,217 7,973,156 87,800 83,067 9,901 144,800 143,950 99,700 105,038 1,693,202 1,693,202 845,327 844,747 - 900,000 1 130,805 - 226,306 - 226,306 98,300 1,201,506 98,900 1,201,047 124,588 124,588 360,973 360,973 32,500 73,974 32,165 73,707 19,400 25,000 17,804 31,038 3,600 4,069 20,000 23,148 79,500 2,118,342 79,179 2,117,887 2,000 212,000 212,000 5,000 5,000 402,103 399,826 100,000 100,000 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 19. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 21. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI 22. Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME (Contributed Funds) 23A. West Hill Dam, MA 24. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 25A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 25B. Barre Falls Dam, MA 25C. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 25D. Colebrook River Lake, CT 25E. Conant Brook Dam, MA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 50,000 -- 9,420 6,000 66,905 20,000 47,716 195,000 36,784 300,084 186,569 490,000 528,000 502,260 528,434 125,000 138,000 137,117 141,839 1,117,000 1,289,755 780,000 692,811 366,000 534,000 381,741 377,657 359,000 588,000 421,872 534,619 452,500 381,000 459,149 380,737 123,000 1,371,946 100,162 1,336,244 406,000 1,029,843 5 - 623,843 5 -150,000 466,000 489,250 350,000 6,269 118,500 109,468 766,084 675,819 350,000 6,269 - 2,306,902 6 - - 2,306,902 6 573,000 1,000,000 9,704,698 562,653 1,008,370 9,697,643 - - 8,606,000 - - 8,606,000 154,000 209,000 2,675,343 155,700 205,959 2,670,534 - - 11,107,842 7 - - 11,107,842 7 651,000 775,410 363,000 485,082 428,000 463,246 393,000 387,628 694,000 13,443,723 666,565 13,405,865 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 410,000 9,208,060 443,252 9,206,957 - 4,815,679 8 - 4,815,679 8 824,000 10,243,050 852,015 10,233,865 - 32,000 9 - 32,000 9 - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 831,000 6,879,527 842,431 6,878,288 - 2,950,530 - 2,950,530 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 25F. Knightville Dam, MA 25G. Littleville Lake, MA 25H. North Hartland Lake, VT 25I. North Springfield Lake, VT 25J. Otter Brook Lake, NH 25K. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 25L. Townshend Lake, VT 25M. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 25N. Union Village Dam, VT Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 181,500 138,000 191,461 136,565 359,000 371,000 350,506 374,009 254,500 373,000 248,535 332,181 456,000 513,000 499,408 516,594 532,000 733,000 550,692 743,363 395,000 449,000 465,319 449,211 495,000 562,000 594,258 558,441 709,000 624,000 933,559 899,401 519,000 413,000 583,878 409,903 134,000 133,134 509,000 498,589 393,000 439,018 686,200 698,087 583,008 573,045 547,000 543,730 653,200 651,630 610,000 653,801 374,000 387,723 137,000 2,664,697 139,418 2,661,321 - 3,415,640 10 - 3,415,640 10 515,000 10,894,446 533,998 10,892,685 - 7,013,412 - 7,013,412 463,000 7,815,427 468,780 7,813,430 - 7,312,225 11 - 7,312,225 11 565,000 9,787,243 578,559 9,780,755 - 6,831,526 12 - 6,831,526 12 750,000 14,315,157 768,897 14,308,461 - 4,360,448 13 - 4,360,448 13 500,000 9,671,297 503,533 9,667,763 - 2,833,610 14 - 2,833,610 14 444,000 10,394,691 445,607 10,388,800 - 8,540,545 15 - 8,540,545 15 685,000 12,511,418 685,718 12,504,249 - 1,666,752 16 - 1,666,752 16 400,000 9,243,725 407,233 9,242,618 - 40,000 9 - 40,000 * - 4,095,160 17 - 4,095,160 17 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 26. Faulkner Island, CT 27. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 28A. Black Rock Lake, CT 28B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 28C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 28D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 28E. Thomaston Dam, CT 29A. Blackwater Dam, NH 29B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 297,000 342,000 320,280 342,801 - 1,500,000 - 151,088 209,000 705,000 126,484 842,390 422,025 7,975 - 415,235 727,501 70,530 19,499 716,122 230,000 383,000 238,957 385,956 388,600 381,376 247,445 5,000 17,032 5,275 29,540 316,000 299,410 576,000 8,780,993 583,342 8,777,665 18,000 1,518,000 105,050 503,583 - 1,279,000 10,029 1,276,461 3,000 16,854 430,000 423,510 839,500 836,381 8,182,300 8,182,300 568,000 6,084,581 580,463 6,075,676 4,178,911 4,178,911 191,000 170,000 204,310 173,965 627,000 796,000 648,754 817,097 321,000 290,000 359,137 262,438 557,000 563,000 682,175 571,955 339,000 367,000 377,727 388,817 339,000 375,000 350,373 341,020 205,000 179,395 884,000 864,285 334,000 346,340 472,000 423,367 369,000 370,261 424,000 442,317 201,000 2,930,934 224,825 2,927,571 - 6,151,562 18 - 6,151,562 18 867,000 15,596,825 885,810 15,585,970 - 2,850,512 19 - 2,850,512 19 416,000 5,635,708 416,610 5,615,034 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 846,000 11,242,342 893,171 11,238,731 - 1,319,746 20 - 1,319,746 20 445,000 6,990,094 447,972 6,989,288 - 2,014,253 21 - 2,014,253 21 550,000 8,119,569 569,142 8,118,669 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 29C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 29D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 29E. North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 30. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 31. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (Contributed Funds) 32. Roughans Point, Revere, MA (Contributed Funds) 33. Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA 34. Saint John River Basin, ME 35. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 36A. Buffumville Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 7,950,487 22 7,950,487 22 679,000 473,704 646,800 491,588 - - 1,567,000 1,407,022 1,623,838 1,429,473 - 26,129 - 13,667 853,000 880,278 887,000 13,125,086 898,613 13,122,559 - - 21,452,440 23 - - 21,452,440 23 948,000 1,364,000 19,959,592 906,863 1,407,794 19,957,136 74,000 73,836 5,000 15,333 105,129 102,835 11,510,088 11,510,088 330,000 665,000 346,224 684,548 183,800 186,510 329,000 7,519,621 325,229 7,515,124 6,513,763 24 6,513,763 24 - 525,000 97,520 136,396 - 380,000 - 14,400 1,889,590 702,000 804,377 710,000 2,171,000 1,766,000 417,252 168,378 2,623,273 - 1,400,000 - - - 777,689 5,000 175,000 50,000 72,540 142,362 57,474 149,976 2,874 406,000 1,281,000 756,979 1,323,441 857 382,000 471,079 - 2,400,000 22,186 2,368,929 - 1,082,000 140,546 959,302 2,492,000 8,208,779 3,889,327 8,151,967 1,600,000 3,000,000 1,325,089 2,102,779 30,000 55,258 602,500 599,759 - 517,000 - 447,381 - 9,911,300 - 9,900,640 270,000 7,703,191 278,425 7,675,619 - 3,367,970 25 - 3,367,453 25 - 210,000 - 209,969 - 2,998,603 26 - 2,998,603 26 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 36B. East Brimfield Lake, MA 36C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 36D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 36E. West Thompson Lake, CT 36F. Westville Lake, MA 37. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 326,500 358,000 355,781 366,233 408,000 410,116 480,000 7,866,016 482,284 7,863,760 7,057,043 27 7,057,043 27 357,000 320,000 367,695 316,086 322,000 323,170 327,000 6,846,439 329,914 6,844,164 4,461,268 28 4,461,268 28 660,000 454,000 694,181 456,138 364,000 361,427 385,000 11,108,947 391,486 11,106,728 2,000,000 7,419,000 8,051,000 17,470,000 342,810 8,855,338 8,222,147 17,420,295 - - - 6,447,164 29 - - - 6,447,164 29 377,000 341,000 353,463 377,318 318,000 337,823 361,000 8,141,599 368,152 8,140,079 7,001,220 30 7,001,220 30 474,000 466,000 507,517 440,891 451,000 477,714 795,000 9,569,997 800,983 9,566,262 5,684,683 31 5,684,683 31 285,000 357,000 373,552 317,706 1,759,000 6,031,294 500,000 825,863 3,210,000 2,150,058 470,804 373,000 409,175 434,500 7,906,059 437,802 7,903,267 657,000 2,829,000 1,320,304 3,105,231 - 615,000 268,538 771,607 31,565,740 31,376,890 3,350,000 3,197,722 - 1,175,000 1,000,000 -615,000 5,295,000 787,662 - 480 3,173,111 4,134,139 1 Excludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. 3 Excludes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 4 Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 6 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 7 Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds and $67,066 for fish passage facility. 8 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 Funds. 9 Recreational cost sharing. 10 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 11 Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 12 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 13 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 14 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 15 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds and $1,117,494 for fish passage facility. 16 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 17 Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 18 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 20 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 23 Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. 24 Excludes $146,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 25 Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 26 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. 28 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. 29 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 1-32 TABLE 1-B NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 August 5, 1886 September 19,1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 3 Do. August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 September 7, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 January 1, 1990 November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 October 12, 1996 AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA (See Section 1 of Text) Entrance channel 100 feet wide by 900 feet long and 9.5 acre anchorage area, both 8 feet deep. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 2 of Text.) Preservation of islands and seawalls. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.' Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of Wier River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard. Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No.3 at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of 40-foot channel. Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. Deauthorizes 1945 Act. Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner Confluence Area to 40 feet. Deauthorizes portion of the 35-foot channel in Boston Inner Harbor lying easterly of the Charlestown waterfront authorized in 1902 River and Harbor Act. Deauthorizes portion of the 40-foot reserved channel authorized in the 1990 Act. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers August 31, 1994. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex.Doc. 206,48th Cong., 2nd sess., Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503 Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p.517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 H. Ex. Doc. No. 162,53rd Cong., 3rd sess.,Annual Report, 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. March 11, 1913. H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 2 Public Law 420,78th Cong. H. Doc. 733, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 2 Federal Register Volume 55, No. 194, October 5, 1990. Section 101, Public Law 101-640. Section 116(2), P.L. 102-580 Section 364(16), P.L. 104-303 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents January 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, September 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program, April 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 September 19, 1890 October 12, 1996 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended October 12, 1996 August 11, 1888 July 14, 1960 as, amended August 17, 1999 July 11, 1870 CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 3 of Text.) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. COCHECO RIVER, NH (See Section 4 of Text.) Provides for a 3 mile long tidewater channel 7 feet deep and 60 to 70 feet wide. Deauthorizes portion of 1890 Act and directs maintenace dredging of the remaining project. COHASSET RIVER, NH (See Section 5 of Text.) Anchorage in inner harbor 7 feet deep, and channel 90 feet wide, 8 feet deep from anchorage to outer harbor. Construstion of anchorage areas 6 feet deep. Deauthorizes portions of the 1945 Act and Section 107 project. FIVEMILE RIVER, CT (See Section 6 of Text.) Entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the mouth of the Fivemile River extending 6,000 feet upstream. (Upper 700 feet of entrance channel, which was never constructed, was deauthorized in October 1978. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 7 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. Deauthorizes portion of the 6-foot channel and turning basin, and redesignates portion of 6-foot channel as an achorage area. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 8 of Text.) Main breakwater. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 74, 51st Cong. 1st sess. Section 365(18), P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 425, 76st Cong. 1st sess. Annual Report 1904, p. 60. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 12, 1965. Section 364(13), P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 1419, 63rd Cong., 3rd sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 15, 1965. Section 365 (a)(11) & (d), P.L. 106-53. Annual report 1868, p. 785 and S. Misc. Doc. 81, 40th Cong., 2nd sess. 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 2, 1882 August 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 November 17, 1986 March 2, 1827 July 11, 1871 August 5, 1886 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 August 26, 1937 October 18, 1965 Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. S. Ex. Doc.26, 47th Cong., 1st sess. Breakwater enclosing inner harbor. S. Doc. 27, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1885, p. 610. Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Rebuilding basin walls and present project dimenions of H. Doc. 828, 60th Cong., 1st sess. dredged area. Deauthorizes two 15-foot anchorages in the outer harbor Section 1002, P.L. 99-662. authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1912. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA (See Section 9 of Text.) Breakwater. S. Doc. 32, 18th Cong., 2nd sess. Present dimensions of breakwater. H. Doc. 63, 41st Cong., 2nd sess. Dredging behind breakwater. H. Ex. Doc. 96, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. Channel, anchorage and jetty. H. Doc. 98, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Deeping channel and basin to 13 feet, realigning the entrance P.L. 86-645, Section 107. channel through the outer harbor to straighten the approach, Authorized by the Chief of and widening the channel to 240 feet from the outer harbor Engineers August 19, 1997. through most of Lewis Bay and to 220 feet from there to the entrance of the Inner Harbor. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI (See Section 13 of Text.) Channel 35 feet deep from deep water in Narragansett Bay to H. Doc. 173, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Fox Point. Deepen 35-foot channel to 40 feet, and provide a 30-foot channel S. Doc. 93, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River. (The India Point channel was deauthorized in November 1986.) March 3, 1873 September 19, 1890 March 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 November 17, 1986 December 18, 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Infrastructure Act of 1991. October 12, 1996 July 14, 1960 as amended 1835 June 10, 1872 SALEM HARBOR, MA (See Section 14 of Text.) Channel 8 feet deep and 300 feet wide at entrance to South River, and construct a seawall and breakwater for the protection of Long Point. Extends channel 6 to 8 feet deep and 50 to 150 feet wide up South River. Channel 10 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide at entrance to South River. Main Ship Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide, and removal of shoal near Abbot Rock Beacon. Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep. Main Ship Channel 32 feet deep and 300 to 400 feet wide. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 15 of Text.) Removal of abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge. Extends project authorization. Increases total project cost. SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 16 of Text.) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. WELLS HARBOR, ME (See Section 17 of Text.) Stone-filled timber crib pier (jetty) at the mouth of the Wells Inlet. Repairs to old government cribwork pier, about 750 feet long, at north side of harbor entrance. S. Ex. Doc. 25, 42th Cong.,3rd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 51st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 303, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 112, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 701, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 31, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Section 1166(c), P.L. 99-662. Section 1085, P.L. 102-240. Section 301 (a) (13), P.L. 104-303 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers February 6, 1980. River & Harbor Act of 1872 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 August 17, 1999 October 23, 1962 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 October 31, 1992 October 12, 1996 June 30, 1948, as amended October 12, 1996 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946, as amended Construction of two stones jetties at inlet (south-940 feet long, north-640 feet long), 8-foot entrance channel, 6-foot inner channel, 6-foot by 7.4-acre anchorage. Extend north jetty 100 feet. Increase design elevations of both jetties. 680-foot long stone revetment for tip of Wells beach at municipal parking area. Add rough stone wave absorber to inner 100 feet of south jetty. Further extend north jetty by 1,225 feet. Extend south jetty by 1,300 feet. Dredge 10-foot by 3.1-acre inner harbor settling basin. Modified dredged features of existing project to deauthorize portions of the inner harbor channel, anchorage and settling basin, realign the inner access channel, redesignate portions of the inner channel and settling basin as part of the 6-foot anchorage, and relocated settling basin to outer harbor. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 18 of Text.) Project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and back shore residential structures above the estimated 100 year flood elevation. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 19 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore west of Mervin Point; widening 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and construction of 5 impermeable groins. Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach and reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for blue mussels. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 21 of Text.) Reconstruct dam. Increases total project cost. AROOSTOOK RIVER, FORT FAIRFIELD, ME (See Section 22 of Text.) Contruct 2,800 linear feet of earth dike and concrete floodwall along the side of the Aroostook River. FAULKNER ISLAND, CT (See Section 26 of Text.) Construct 2,000 linear feet of stone revetment running along the entire east side of the Island and wrapping around the north and south ends. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI (See section 27 of Text.) Restoration of 34 acres of salt marsh by installing two culverts under Escape Road and excavating channels. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LANCASTER, MA (See Section 29E of Text.) Contruct 500 linear feet of stone slope protection along the streambank of the North Nashua River adjacent to Massachusetts Highway Route 70. P.L. 86-645, Section 101. H. Doc. 202, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. Design Modification Authorized by the Chief of Engineers September 24, 1962. Design Modification Authorized by the Chief of Engineers September 20, 1965. P.L. 106-53, Section 365(a)(9) & (c). Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers November 6, 1995. H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers March 20, 1992. Section 358, P.L. 102-580. Section 347, P.L. 104-303. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 7, 1999. Section 527, P.L. 104-303 Section 1135, P.L. 99-662. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers January 13, 1995. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 21, 1999 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 31, 1992 November 17, 1986 November17, 1986 Novemberl7, 1986 November 17, 1986 QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI (See Section 31 of Text.) Construction of two elevated water storage towers and extension, rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 32 of Text.) Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. SAGAMORE MARSH, CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 33 of Text.) Restoration of 50 acres of salt marsh by installing larger culverts beneath Scussett Beach and Cape Cod Canal Service Roads and excavating channels. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME (See Section 34 of Text.) Ten-year research and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 37 of Text.) Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground; channel improvements downstream of the tunnel outlet; and reconstruction of Old Quincy Reservoir Dam located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Section 362, P.L. 102-580. Section 401, P.L. 99-662. Section 1135, P.L. 99-662. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers September 5, 1996. Section 1108, P.L. 99-662. H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 1 A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, December 31, 1970. 2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel.) 3Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 1-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA6 Apponaug Cove, RI Bagaduce River, ME3,4 Bar Harbor, ME Bass Harbor, ME 6 Bass Harbor Bar, ME Beals Harbor, ME Belfast Harbor, ME Bellamy River, NH 3,4 Beverly Harbor, MA Black Rock Harbor, CT Branford Harbor, CT Bridgeport Harbor, CT Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI 2 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME 6 Bucksport Harbor, ME Bullocks Point Cover, RI Bunker Harbor, ME 6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA6 Camden Harbor, ME Canapitsit Channel, MA4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME Cathance River, ME3 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA Clinton Ifarbor, CT Coasters Island Harbor, RI 4 Cobscook Bay, ME 3,4 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, MEG Criehaven Harbor, ME Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA Damariscotta River, ME4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA Duck Island Harbor, CT Duxbury Harbor, MA Edgartown Harbor, MA Essex River, MA Exeter River, NH4 Fall River Harbor, MA 1 Falmouth Harbor, MA Frenchboro Harbor, ME Georges River, ME Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI'1 Greenwich Bay, RI Greenwich Harbor, CT Guilford Harbor, CT Hampton Harbor, NH Harraseeket River, ME 4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY Hendrick's Harbor, ME 1998 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1990 1983 1987 1976 1907 1996 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1998 1985 1911 1866 1996 1984 1997 1954 1997 1906 1916 1968 1953 1997 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1978 1978 1997 1989 1893 1969 1995 1996 1896 1931 1957 219,042 156,874 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 34,643 246,048 9,537 4,491,119 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 266,705 191,406 5,500 4,173 1,550,185 26 797,954 40,776 24,200 27,168 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 65,614 21,759 62,454 6,164,757 9 123,763 657,345 25,788 1,296,934 189,037 2,000 198,758 137,222 200,000 30,963 8,401 28,204 850,020 57,469 39 2,187 37,672 20,382 143,077 303,157 28,427 1,672,093 1,925,607 2,186,627 32,092 22,133 410,630 32,906 235,138 196,489 12,279 361,364 39,327 4,344,986 1,095,884 13,161 17,778,352 100,469 517,617 54,328 1,459,047 23 905 5,792 402,424 412,764 2,422,540 29 62,980 119,181 8 3,032 2,178,967 336,549 24,616 312,414 1,736,699 604,821 3,719 225,972 1,920,667 2,280,607 30,069 38,462 23,025 187,500 104,583 7 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 43,500 130,410 11,643 35,000 28 10,000 35,000 25,000 100,000 25,500 193,761 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Hingham Harbor, MA Housatonic River, CT Ipswich River, MA Island End River, Chelsea, MA 6 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH Jonesport Harbor, ME Josias River, ME 5 Kennebec River, ME Kennebunk River, ME Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA 6 Lamprey River, NH 4 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA4 Lubec Channel, ME Lynn Harbor, MA Machias River, ME Malden River, MA20 Matinicus Harbor, ME Medomak River, ME Menemsha Creek, MA Merrimack River, MA Mianus River, CT Milford Harbor, CT 5 Moosabec Bar, ME Mystic River, CT Mystic River, MA Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA Narragansett Town Beach, RI22 Narraguagus River, ME New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA New Harbor, ME 5 New Haven Breakwater, CT New Haven Harbor, CT 1 New London Harbor, CT Newport Harbor, RI Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT G Northeast Harbor, ME Norwalk Harbor, CT Owl's Head Harbor, ME 3,5 Patchogue River, CT Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI and CT Pawtuxet Cove, RI Penobscot River, ME Pepperell Cove, ME Pig Island Gut, ME 6 Pleasant River, ME Plymouth Harbor, MA Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH5 1954 1983 1969 1983 1980 1977 1992 1995 1998 1996 1895 1976 1913 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1985 1989 1930 1957 1986 1989 1969 1997 1966 1950 1995 1986 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1998 1997 1975 1985 1969 1966 1892 1998 1996 1956 1996 28,316 859,691 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 7,489,073 621,186 1,599,940 261,417 8,940 99,098 19,980 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,000 11 17,000 56,926 369,891 132,435 90,506 11,400 197,582 3,222,777 502,661 13 27,398 821,144 1,857,618 118,620 1,242,246 4,773,246 638,774 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,129 124,158 355,445 318,787 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,218 32 2,714,510 27 1,083,504 18,360,800 176,720 2,551,828 67,834 10,918 195,886 651,644 47,328 444,702 4,503,243 1,464,000 37,386 67,123 19,673 33,289 273,134 260,067 45,097 8,989 92,359 750,759 739,100 726,012 1,406,402 25,227 207,285 2,021,778 759,000 171,779 786,656 42,891 40,273 17,122,432 1,995,100 147,078 154,703 57,247 3,918,827 34,124 1,368,989 1,488,660 239,046 1,085,175 53,156 94,656 217 1,511,339 33 8,107,334 846,590 2,427,598 222,010 192,336 10 832,119 79,668 24 88,917 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 12 14,000 20,385 7,015 14 65,139 34,500 4,383 20,000 295,356 541,611 17,587 4,437,665 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Potowomut River, RI Provincetown Harbor, MA5 Richmond Harbor, ME 4 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME 4 Rockland Harbor, ME Rockport Harbor, MA Rockport Harbor, ME 3 Royal River, ME 5 Rye Harbor,NH Saco River, ME 5 St. Croix River, ME Sakonnet Harbor, RI 5 Sakonnet River, RI Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA '8 Sasanoa River, ME 3'4 Scarboro River, ME Scituate Harbor, MA Searsport Harbor, ME Seekonk River,RI South Bristol Harbor, ME Southport Harbor, CT Southwest Harbor, ME Stamford Harbor, CT Stockton Harbor, ME 34 Stonington Harbor, CT Stonington Harbor, ME 6 Stony Creek, Branford, CT 6 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME Taunton River, MA Tenants Harbor, ME Thames River, CT Union River, ME Vineyard Haven, MA Wareham Harbor, MA Warren River, RI Warwick Cove, RI 6 Wellfleet Harbor, MA Westcott Cove, CT Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT Weymouth Back River, MA Weymouth-Fore & Town River, MA 5 Wickford Harbor, RI 5 Wilson Point Harbor, CT 4 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH Winter Harbor, ME 6 Winthrop Harbor, MA Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME 5 Woods Hole Channel, MA York Harbor, ME 1882 1997 1883 1882 1976 1996 1989 1997 1991 1995 1950 1995 1909 1922 1915 1997 1997 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1995 1914 1948 1920 1967 1996 1943 1896 1890 1975 1995 1978 1972 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1995 1940 1997 5,000 3,889,577 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 1,808,745 32,000 336,704 130,342 1,064,983 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 16 672,214 89,593 59,213 19 180,042 892,824 33,000 377,328 898,500 112,487 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 146,855 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 157,634 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 733,272 230,000 239,654 50 1,053,966 1,808 537,778 295,378 274,666 1,777,1555 30 719,718 2,907,055 64,685 392,280 13,578 16,060 124 2,735,388 1,141,587 83,170 896,773 43,923 434,335 90,085 1,832,247 34,376 157,273 33,258 813,197 32,917 20,854 1,709,440 368,675 26,806 42,891 116,049 1,858,413 347,248 205,744 27,353 1,725,721 162,650 29,870 23,338 38,515 609,095 55,614 1,116,848 797,847 51,430 49,562 31 61,338 17 74,996 19,892 21,928 10,000 69,976 67,792 2,567 18,285 7,501 169,636 85,176 133,985 21 32,000 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 25 43,660 32,161 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Projects are completed unless otherwise noted. 1 Completed except for inactive portion. 2 Inactive. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. 5 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 7 Construction of a public landing by local interests has not been completed. 8 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds. 9 Excludes $37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 10 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other. " Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 12 Excludes 173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 14 Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. 1s Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 19 Excludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. 20 Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 22 Lack of local sponsor. (Project authorized by Section 361 of WRDA 1992.) 23 Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds. 24 Excludes $17,495 non-project cost for removal of mooring chains, of which the project sponsor still owes $12,198. 25 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds. 26 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 27 Excludes $1,926,000 expended for rehabilitation. 28 Excludes $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction. 29 Excludes $571,401 Contributed Funds. 30 Excludes $20,00 Contributed Funds, Others. 31 Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Others. 32 Excludes $894,475 expended for major rehabilitation. 33 Excludes $400 Contributed Funds. 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sep. 30, 1999 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA 5 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk,Newport, RI1 1995 1,155,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1961 3,930 7,859 Middle Beach, CT 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 2 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 5 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA 5 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT 4 1995 1,870,407 1,089,351 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA 1962 621,464 1,242,880 Revere Beach, MA 1994 3,889,016 2,197,312 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME 1993 233,260 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI 1959 40,143 82,000 Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT5 1996 889,634 457,495 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1961 23,759 47,518 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT 5 1995 677,170 237,628 Seaside Park, CT 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT 4 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT 3 1956 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI 1995 1,648,249 970,000 Southport Beach, CT 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, MA 1960 176,567 353,134 Projects are completed unless otherwise noted. 1Complete except inactive portion. 2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103. 3 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) 4 Portion authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) SAuthorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA 3 1977 41,419 Alley Bay, Beals, ME3 1979 190,500 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA3 1978 132,113 Ansonia - Derby, CT 1977 18,266,040 - 8 Bagaduce River, ME 3 1985 129,500 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 2 1989 2,591,000 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 3 1986 249,999 4,576 Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA3 1995 189,131 54,447 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA4 1974 47,300 Canton, MA 2 1964 156,568 92,981 Charles River Dam, MA 1981 41,170,921 5,554,088 9 Charlestown, NH 3 1976 113,330 Cherryfield, ME 2 1963 191,095 Chicopee, MA 1954 1,433,600 385 Chicopee Falls, MA 1978 2,183,912 411,292 10 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3 1987 168,000 Cocheco River, Famington, NH 2 1963 183,100 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT3 1996 262,046 69,121 23 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3 1982 180,000 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3 1976 54,703 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 3 1988 250,000 180,000 Danbury, CT 1978 13,143,000 - 11 Derby, CT 1977 7,582,642 - 12 East Branch Dam, CT 1973 1,959,836 East Hartford, CT 1951 2,135,447 7,637 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT3 1996 500,000 257,720 22 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 2 1979 220,284 Fort Kent, ME 2 1979 1,997,820 Fox Point Barrier, RI 1976 11,112,801 3,616,290 13 Gardner, MA 2 1970 495,691 15,000 Gulf Street, Milford, CT 3 1991 365,000 21,000 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT 1970 2,572,357 Hartford, CT 1960 6,929,100 2,781,100 Hartford, White River, VT 2 1973 332,236 Haverhill, MA 1940 1,743,485 120,000 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA 2 1979 2,325,470 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3 1980 207,390 Holyoke, MA 1953 3,418,000 24,447 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 2 1985 739,003 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 3 1982 102,800 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3 1981 202,608 Huntington, MA 3 1960 3,900 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA 3 1983 172,000 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3 1985 165,500 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3 1985 163,082 Keene, NH 4 1955 44,100 Lancaster, Israel River, NH2 1997 595,878 Lee, Housatonic River, MA 3 1976 37,852 Little River, Belfast,ME 3 1990 166,682 43,000 Lowell, MA 1945 1,284,974 Lower Woonsocket, RI 1977 6,600,681 1,266,638 '4 Machias River, Machias, ME 3 1987 152,000 Machias Bay, Machiasport, ME 3 1995 133,473 32,733 15 Mad River Lake, CT 1973 4,773,020 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT 1998 1,177,905 270,183 26 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME 3 1987 243,000 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3 1980 107,682 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3 1988 110,000 Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME 3 1995 132,967 24,893 16 Nashua, NH 1950 270,000 6 327 New London Hurricane Barrier, CT 1992 8,504,919 7 2,015,709 21 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT 3 1985 222,500 Northampton, MA 1950 960,000 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT 4 1977 73,865 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA 1981 4,605,000 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3 1979 81,671 North Nashua River, Leominster, MA3 1997 152,756 50,919 North Nashua River, Leominster (Sewer Line), MA3 1997 221,455 73,818 Norwalk, CT 2 1952 52,150 Norwich, CT 1960 1,209,000 Park River, Hartford, CT 1986 60,176,919 - 17 Pawcatuck, CT 1966 644,311 214,106 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI2 1986 3,174,260 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 2 1986 178,045 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME 3 1994 70,990 20,554 18 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 3 1987 189,000 Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA 3 1995 500,000 182,419 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3 1986 227,500 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3 1980 73,674 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA' 1996 1,905,261 221,614 24 Salmon River, Colchester, CT 3 1983 247,100 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 3 1984 127,500 Saugus River & Tributaries, MA1 1997 5,525,000 Saxonville, MA 1980 4,218,700 - 19 Sebago Lake, Standish, ME 1998 500,000 346,009 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 2 1985 1,857,475 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3 1977 37,657 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA 2 1978 1,803,738 South River, Conway, MA 3 1987 133,500 Springdale, MA 1952 700,000 Springfield, MA 1950 932,000 5,350 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3 1983 116,296 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 4 1973 19,500 Sucker Brook Dam, CT 1976 2,227,792 58,800 Three Rivers, MA 1970 1,577,189 20 Torrington, East Branch, CT 2 1963 389,237 Torrington, West Branch, CT 2 1963 228,237 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA 3 1993 55,228 18,409 Village of Saxtons, VT 3 1985 140,500 Ware, MA 2 1963 400,000 Waterbury-Watertown, CT 2 1963 265,300 Weston, VT 4 1957 13,000 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA 3 1983 119,433 West River, New Haven, CT2 1996 3,883,293 748,840 25 West Springfield, MA 6 1992 2,043,728 14,343 West Warren, MA2 1964 389,200 41,000 Winsted, CT 1954 245,500 Woonsocket, RI 1962 4,033,100 224,476 Worcester Diversion, MA 1978 5,086,896 70,161 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects are complete unless otherwise noted. 1 Inactive. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 3 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 79-526, Sec. 14) 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 83-780, Sec. 208) 5 Portion Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 6 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. 7 Excludes $852,127 non project cost per 1976 WRDA. s Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 10 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 11 Excludes $1,146,828 Contributed Funds, Other. 12 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnations. 14 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 15 Excludes $11,758 for lands. 16 Excludes $6,120 for lands. 17 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. 18 Excludes $3,109 for lands. 19 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Excludes $1,629,256 for lands and $303,251 Contributed Funds, Other. 22 Excludes $10,195 lands. 23 Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. 24 Excludes $109,140 for land and $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. 25 Excludes $554,638 for lands and $71,650 Contributed Funds, Other. 26 Excludes $122,452 for lands. TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME 1 1935 $6,384,394 1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir - Aug 1977 - - Andover Lake, CT - Aug 1977 - - Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Oct 1978 - - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1888 & 1890 Acts) 1932 Nov 1986 - - Bass Harbor, ME (portions of Section 107 project) 1965 Aug 1999 Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000 - Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 378,300 - Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - Big River Reservoir, RI (portion of 1986 Act) 1987 Nov 1990 - - Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1958 Act) 1988 Nov 1986 - - Boothbay Harbor, ME (Portion of 1912 Act) 1953 Oct 1992 - - Boothbay Harbor, ME 1953 Aug 1999 18,000 - Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) 1999 Jan 1990 - - Boston Harbor, MA (portion of 1902 Act) 1999 Oct 1992 - - Boston Harbor, MA (Chelsea River portion of 1962 Act) 1999 Oct 1996 - - Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Branford Harbor, CT (portion of 1902 of Act) 1990 Oct 1990 - - Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1983 Nov 1979 - - Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1946 Act) 1983 Oct 1996 - - Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1958 Act) 1983 Oct 1996 - - Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1958 Act) 1983 Aug 1999 - - Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977 - - Bucksport Harbor, ME (portion of 1902 Act) 1907 Aug 1999 - - Cambridgeport Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME (portion of 1896 Act) 1964 Aug 1999 - - Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 - - Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - Clinton Harbor, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1985 Aug 1999 - - Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - Cocheco River, NH (portion of 1890 Act) 1999 Oct 1996 - - Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of 1945 Act) 1999 Oct 1996 - - Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of Section 107 project) 1999 Oct 1996 - - Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT 1932 Jan 1990 132,146 - Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) 1996 Oct 1978 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (1950 Act) 1996 Nov 1986 - - Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME (portion of 1965 Act) 1984 Nov 1986 26,285,298 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1968 Jan 1990 - - East Boothbay Harbor, ME (portion of 1910 Act) 1953 Oct 1996 - - East Boothbay Harbor, ME 1953 Aug 1999 6,500 - Eastport Harbor, ME 1984 Nov 1983 638,675 141,530 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1965 Act) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1984 Nov 1986 - - Falmouth Harbor, MA (portion of 1948 Act) 1978 Oct 1996 - - Falmouth Harbor, MA (portion of 1948 Act) 1978 Aug 1999 - - Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1999 Oct 1978 - - Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 - Gorton's Pond, Warwick, RI - Nov 1991 - - Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1989 Nov 1986 - - Greenwich Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) - Nov 1990 - - 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1969 Oct 1978 - - Green Harbor, MA (portion of Sec 107 project) 1999 Aug 1999 - - Guilford Harbor, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1995 Oct 1996 - - Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 1999 Nov 1986 - - Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1888 Act) 1983 Nov 1979 - - Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 - Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion of 1968 Act) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion of 1902 Act) 1998 Nov 1986 - - Kennebunk River, ME (portion of 1962 Act) 1996 Oct 1996 - - Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1954 & 1935 Acts) 1956 Nov 1986 - - Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 1986 Apr 1999 50,000 - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - Merrimack River, MA - Nov 1991 - - Mianus River, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1985 Nov 1986 - - Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1902 & 1937 Acts) 1989 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 - Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1913 Act) 1957 Nov 1986 - - Mystic River, CT (portion of 1913 Act) 1957 Oct 1996 - - Mystic River, MA (portion of 1950 Act) 1986 Oct 1996 - - Nantasket Beach, MA 1971 Jan 1990 - Nantucket Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1989 Nov 1986 Nantucket Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion of 1880 Act) 1989 Jan 1990 - - Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 - - Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - Neponset River, Milton Town Landing to Port Norfolk, MA - Nov 1991 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 1997 Nov 1986 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (portion of 1909 & 1930 Acts) 1997 Aug 1999 - - Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1999 Nov 1986 Newburyport Harbor, MA (portion of 1910 Act) 1999 Oct 1992 - - Newport Harbor, RI (portion of 1907 Act) 1953 Nov 1999 - - New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1946 & 1910 Acts) 1995 Nov 1986 - - Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - Norwalk Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) 1983 Oct 1996 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - Patchoque River, Westbrook, CT (portion of 1954 Act) 1997 Oct 1996 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portions of 1896 Act) 1997 Nov 1986 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT 1997 Nov 1979 - - (1960 Act) Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Phillips Lake, MA 1982 May 1997 300,000 - Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1999 Nov 1986 - - Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1997 Oct 1978 - - Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1956 Act) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1995 Oct 1979 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1995 Jun 1982 176,000 - Salem Harbor, MA (inactive portion of 1958 Act) 1999 Jul 1995 - - Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1999 Nov 1986 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - Searsport Harbor, ME (portion of 1962 Act) 1966 Aug 1999 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (uncompleted portion of 1954 Act) 1964 Nov 1986 - - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - Southport Harbor, CT (portion of 1935 Act) 1962 Oct 1996 - - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1980 Oct 1978 Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) 1980 Jan 1990 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1950 Act) 1959 Nov 1986 - - Stonington Harbor, ME (1960 Act) 1985 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stony Creek, CT (portion of 1960 Act) 1995 Oct 1996 - - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) 1948 Jan 1990 - - Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) 1964 Jan 1990 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (portion of 1960 Act) 1961 Nov 1986 - - Trumbull Lake, CT 1983 May 1997 1,498,800 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1896 Jan 1990 Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Wells Harbor, ME (portion of 1960 Act) 1999 Aug 1999 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1965 Aug 1977 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1892 & 1954 Acts) 1972 Nov 1979 - - Westport River, MA 1942 Jan 1990 - - Weymouth-Fore and Town Rivers, MA (portion of 1965 Act) 1979 & 1983 Oct 1996 - - Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 Jul 1995 605,023 - 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Coordination $6,951 Penobscot River, Bangor, ME 11,068 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 79,875 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Morris Cove, New Haven, CT $10,941 Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 19,836 $19,829 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 7,482 16,382 TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205 PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expend Black Rocks Creek, Salisbury, MA $64,750 $4,930 Coordination 10,702 Farm River, East Haven, CT 7,075 Harbor Brook, Meriden, CT 29,881 Salem River, Haddam & East Haddam, CT 11,692 Waits River Basin, VT 14,928 White River Basin, VT 10,193 TABLE 1-K EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Allins Cove, Byway Road, Barrington, RI $10,255 Coordination 17,728 Connecticut River, Charlestown, NH 7,500 Contoocook River, Old Concord & River Roads, Henniker, NH 6,500 Hoosic River, Syndicate Road, Williamstown, MA 8,411 Merrimack River, Riverside Road, Haverhill, MA 10,189 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-L ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Broad Meadows Marsh Restoration, MA $36,256 Boyd's Marsh (Town Pond), RI 71,863 Coordination Account 6,032 Fish Habitat Restoration, Torrington,CT 52,511 Initial Appraisals 8,664 - TABLE 1-M AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 206, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Coordination $6,310 Copperas Brook, VT 10,807 Lonsdale Drive-in Restoration, RI 89,585 Parker Pond, MA 16,182 Potter Pond, South Kingston, RI 2,421 Preliminary Restoration Plans 30,799 Presumpscot River Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, ME 54,287 TABLE 1-N BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA Woonsocket, RI Lower Woonsocket, RI 48 Diversion tunnel and channel 15 Channel improvement Flood wall, conduits and 13 channel improvement $4,923,500 3,733,100 8,356,239 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 1,069,000 3 4,802,100 435,000 8,791,239 1-50 TABLE 1-N (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIR LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 256,619 - 256,619 5 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 - 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,000 4 1 Includes relocation. 4 $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 5 $250,000 Federal; $6,619 non-Federal. 3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-0 CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village 2 White River Jct. 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160 North Hartland 2 White River Jct. 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 North Springfield 2 Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 6,831,526 Ball Mountain 2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,757,842 350,000 11,107,842 earth Townshend 2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 6,662,545 1,878,000 8,540,545 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook 2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully 2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls 2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville 2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville 2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook 2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 4 6,983,020 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,792 180,0003 2,407,792 1-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-0 (Continued) CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Non-Federal cost. 2 For details, see individual report. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,591,000 - $ 2,591,000 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 31 Streambank protection 331,167 G - 331,167 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,143,084 271,000 2,414,084 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 60 Streambank protection 757,720 10,195 767,915 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 510,691 35,000 545,691 Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 386,000 - 386,000 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 9,710,200 4 1,150,000 10,860,200 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,442,447 150,000 3,592,447 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,146 - 44,146 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 6 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT 51 Conduit 58,876,919 1,300,000 60,176,919 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 2,126,875 7 109,140 2,236,015 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 937,350 2 272,000 1,209,350 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,079 2,000 15,079 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 2,043,452 3 30,000 2,073,452 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 430,176 64,000 494,176 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 1 To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 5 Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. Excludes $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-P HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nauga- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000 3 $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,000 3 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, MA Ansonia-Derby, CT Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA Danbury, CT Derby, CT Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA Salisbury, CT Sheffield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT Torrington, West Branch, CT 111.0 13.0 96.0 56.0 12.0 35.0 83.0 133.0 76.0 96.0 43.0 51.0 52.0 Earth dike and stone slope protection Wall, levee, channel improvement and pumping station Stone slope protection Walls, channel improvement and bridge replacememt Walls, levees and pumping station Channel improvements Snagging and clearing project Stone arch culvert Gabionade with slope protection Stone slope protection Timber Bulkhead Dike and channel improvement Walls, dikes and channel $41,419 - $ 41,419 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 430,000 13,143,000 1,862,000 7,582,642 647,000 430,000 15,005,000 8,229,642 1,448,087 122,452 1,570,539 73,865 - 73,865 739,003 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 228,237 85,000 824,003 - 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 228,237 1-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-P (Continued) HOUSATIONIC RIVER BASIN, CT RI AND MA (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Waterbury- Watertown, CT 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. TABLE 1-Q MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total Franklin Falls Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Everett Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,000 1 For details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 1-54 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-Q (Continued) MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS 1 LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA Haverhill, MA 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and 1,863,485 - 1,863,485 pumping station Lowell, MA 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 ' 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 4 North Nashua River, 90.0 Stone slope protection 81,671 - 81,671 Lancaster, MA North Nashua River, 90.0 Stone slope protection 360,000 - 360,00 Lancaster, MA North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 203,675 - 203,675 Leominster, MA North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 295,273 - 295,273 Leominster (Sewer Line), MA North Nashua River, MA 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 ' For details, see individual report. 2 To be borne by local interests. a Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. TABLE 1-R THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 47 of Text) RESERVOIRS1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total Hodges Village Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 1 For details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 1-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1999 TABLE 1-R (Continued) THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 47 of Text) RESERVOIRS 1 LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 1 Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 West River, New Haven, CT - Channel improvements 4,619,543 2 554,638 5,174,181 1 Borne by local interests. 2 Excludes $12,590 for revisions to flood insurance rate map and $71,650 Contributed funds not required. 1-56 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-S RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted MASSACHUSETTS Boston Harbor Cuttyhunk Harbor Dorchester Harbor Fall River Harbor Gloucester Harbor Green Harbor Lynn Harbor New Bedford Harbor Newburyport Harbor Salem Harbor Scituate Harbor Sesuit Harbor Weymouth Fore River CONNECTICTUT Clinton Harbor Conn. River Below Harford Mianus River Milford Harbor Mystic River New Haven Harbor New London Harbor Patchogue River Thames River NEW HAMPSHIRE Hampton Harbor Lamprey River Little Harbor Portsmouth Harbor Jan/Feb//Mar/Jun 1999 Mar 1999 Apr-Sep 1999 Aug/Sep 1999 Apr/May/Jul 1999 Oct 98/Jan 1999 Sep 1999 Feb 1999 Oct 98/Aug/Sep 1999 Feb/Mar 1999 May/Jul/Sep 1999 Apr 1999 Sep 1999 Jan 1999 Oct/Dec 98/Jan/Jun/Sep 1999 Oct 1998 Jan/Feb/Jun 1999 Dec 98/Jan1999 Dec 98/Jan 1999 Dec 98/Jan/May 1999 Jul/Aug 1999 Apr-Jun 1999 Feb/Mar 1999 Aug 1999 Jul/Aug 1999 May/Aug 1999 MAINE Biddeford Pool Carvers Harbor Hendricks Harbor Jonesport Harbor Kennebec River Kennebunk River Pig Island Gut Portland Harbor Saco River Stonington Harbor Union River Wells Harbor Winter Harbor RHODE ISLAND Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove Newport Harbor Pawtuxet Cove Seekonk River Oct 1998 Jan 1999 Mar/Jun 1999 Dec 98/Jan/Feb 1999 Dec 98/Jan/May/Jun 1999 Jul 1998 Jun/Jul 1999 Oct-Dec 1998 Jun-Sep 1999 Feb/Mar/Jun 1999 Jun 1998 Feb-Jun 1999 Jun 1999 Feb 1999 Jun 1999 Dec 98/Feb-Sep 1999 May/Aug 1999 Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under PCS for FY 1999 were (1) monitoring surverys at the Portland, Central Long Island Sound, Massachusetts Bay, and Boston Harbor Confine Aquatic disposal sites (2) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 3 monitoring study reports and a public information video were completed and distributed to the public and regional resource agencies. A public symposium was also held to discuss program results. Total cost of contracts was $750,000. Labor costs of $145,000 for program management, sampling and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 1-57 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT * NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, NJ. In addition it exercises jurisdiction over matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control ................... 2-3 2. East Rockaway Inlet, NY................ 2-3 3. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY ............. 2-3 4. Hudson River, NY ...................... 2-4 5. Hudson River at Athens, NY.............. 2-5 6. Jamaica Bay, NY....................... 2-5 7. Kill Van Kull & Newark Bay, NJ & NY ..... 2-6 8. Mamaroneck Harbor, NY .............. 2-6 9. Moriches Inlet, NY ..................... 2-7 10. Narrows and Lake Champlain, NY ......... 2-8 11. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, (Port Jersey), NJ ....................... 2-8 12. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift .............................. 2-8 13. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas.................... 2-9 14. New York and New Jersey Channels ....... 2-10 15. Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, NJ ...... 2-11 16. Supervisor of New York Harbor........... 2-11 17. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 2-12 18. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 2-12 19. Navigation work under special authorization . 2-12 Beach Erosion Control 20. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet; Long Beach Island, NY ................. 2-12 21. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY................... 2-12 22. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY ... 2-13 23. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ.......... 2-15 24. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY .................... 2-15 25. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ ......... 2-16 26. Other Authorized Beach Erosion control projects ...................... 2-17 27. Beach erosion control work under special authorization ................... 2-17 Flood Control 28. Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ............ 2-17 29. Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront and Historic Area, NJ .................. 2-17 Flood Control (Cont.) Page 30. North Ellenville, NY ................... 2-17 31. New York City Watershed, NY ........... 2-18 32. Passaic River Basin, NJ & NY............ 2-18 33. Preservation of Natural Flood Storage, Passaic River, NJ......................2-19 34. Ramapo at Oakland, NJ................. 2-20 35. Raritan River Basin, Greenbrook Sub-Basin, NJ ........................ 2-20 36. Inspection of complete flood control projects ........................... .2-21 37. Other authorized flood control projects ..... 2-21 38. Flood control work under special authorization ......................... 2-21 39. 40. 41. General Investigations Surveys ................ ...... 2-22 Collection and study of basic data ......... 2-22 Deauthorized projects .................. 2-22 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement ......... 2-24 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation ............. 2-27 Table 2-C Hudson River, NY, Features of Lock and Dam Included In Existing Project Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities ............. 2-32 Table 2-F Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................ 2-33 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects . 2-34 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects............ 2-36 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 2-36 Table 2-J Surveys ....................... 2-37 Table 2-K Preconstruction Engineering and Design 2-37 Table 2-L Cost for Flood Plain Management Services ........................ 2-37 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects.............. 2-38 Table 2-N Section 107 Study................ 2-39 Table 2-0 Section 103 Studies .............. 2-39 Table 2-P Section 205 Studies ............... 2-40 Table 2-Q Section 14 Studies ................ 2-40 Table 2-R Section 206 Studies .............. 2-40 Table 2-S Section 1135 Studies .............. 2-40 2-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 2-2 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut. Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, However, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1989 has been the seventeenth year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in the Lake Champlain Basin, Vermont. Recent work continued the removal of water chestnut and eurasian milfoil from portions of the basin. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was complete in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $2,321,384. In FY 1998, the New York District did not cost-share a FY 1998 program with the State of Vermont, as Federal funds were not yet available. In October 1991, Waterways Experiment Station was directed to conduct a multi-year study which would identify and test potential biocontrol agents of water chestnuts. No successful biocontrol agents of water chestnut were identified. 2. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing Project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12 foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmosphere pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorization Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway, including oil terminals. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with mechanical handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during the period. A contract for Maintenance dredging of East Rockaway Inlet was awarded September 30, 1998 to Weeks Marine Inc. for removal of 228,006 cubic yards of material. Dredging was completed during 1st quarter of 1999. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $2,067,750.67 was expended on project during FY 1999. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May, 1935. 3. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 feet deep and 450 feet wide along the northern edge of the Inlet's shoaling area connecting the ocean to the deep water in the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way. Terminal facilities. Great South Bay has extensive public and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreational boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party and head 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 fishing boats) continues throughout the year. Operations and results during period. The fifth scheduled nourishment cycle was awarded on 8 September 1999. Approximately, a total of 1,140,000 cy of material is expected to be dredged from Fire Island Inlet channel and deposition basin with the placement of 1,000,000 cy of this material at Gilgo Beach and the remaining 140,000 cubic yards of material will be placed at Robert Moses State Park Beach. Total contract cost was $10,071,800.00. Construction General funds expended in FY 99 was $1,219,053.20, Operations and Maintenance funds expended in FY 99 was $695,277.49 and State funds expended in FY 99 was $403,260.94. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over a decade. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting 1973 and completed in 1977 under provision of the 1962 Act (see Table 2B). Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and consequent erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge using operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. Since FY 1990, the realigned channel was dredged to project depth each year with placement of material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purpose. 4. HUDSON RIVER, NY Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,2(X) feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depth of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of NY. In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany'and Troy, NY, to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of sediment from the Hudson River federal project channel was awarded to NATCO Limited Partnership on 4 February 1998. The contract removed a total of 218,592 cubic yards of material at a total contract cost of $2,593,269.28. Operations and maintenance funds in the 2-4 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT amount of $792,800 for contract and $112.200 for supervision and administration were expended during FY 1999 to complete the contract work. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing project condition surveys at a total cost including supervision and administration of $385,000 for maintenance during FY 1999. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of snags and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a total cost including supervision and administration of $278,000. A Contract for sandblasting, painting and seal repairs to the Troy Lock stoplog cofferdam was awarded to R.M. Lill, Inc. on 23 August 1999. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $162,565 for contract and $28,400 for engineering, design, supervision and contract administration were expended during FY 1999 to complete the contract work. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated building and grounds. Operation of the Troy Lock was suspended for the 1998 navigation season on November 30, 1998 and resumed for the 1999 navigation season on May 1, 1999. Total funds in the amount $975,000 were expended during FY 1999 for operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated buildings and grounds including performing instrumentation monitoring, periodic inspection of the Troy Dam gallery, supervision and administration. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet. 5. HUDSON RIVER AT ATHENS, NY Location. Athens, New York is along the west bank of the Hudson River approximately 116 miles above the Battery, New York City and approximately 29 miles downstream of Albany, New York. (See Geological Survey, Hudson North, NY quadrangle). Existing project. No constructed project has ever been done in Athens. The main Hudson River navigation channel runs along the east bank of the Hudson River, Hudson New York opposite Middle Ground Flats. The proposed project for Athens consists of the design and construction of a 300-foot wide channel to a depth of 24 feet (mean low water) extending from the existing Federal in the vicinity of the Hudson City Light to the north dock at Union Street in Athens. The project was authorized in Section 110 of the September 1996 Energy and Water Appropriations Act. Preliminary surveys, geologic, and sediment chemical tests have been carried out. A preliminary channel alignment has been prepared with accompanying dredge quantities. The preliminary cost is $20,400,000 with additional cost needed for improvements at the existing terminal docks.A draft Design Agreement and Project Management Plan has been prepared and agreed to by the non-Federal sponsor. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor must sign the Design Agreement before detailed design and environmental studies can be initiated. The non-Federal sponsor would cost share in the design of the project. If the project is found to be viable, then another non-Federal sponsor would cost share in the construction. Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Preliminary studies have been completed and coordination is ongoing with potential non-Federal sponsors. 6. JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1,000 feet long at the point - thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality along south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along the south shore, 3,000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2,200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch; and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimensions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay,.but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 20 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet at Barren Island, 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961), excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Legal cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interest furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredge materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of New York advised that disposal areas are available and necessary document "holding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance, hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5. Operations and results during the period. A continuing contract for the removal and disposal of material lying above the plane of 20 feet below mean low water in Jamaica Bay, NY was awarded on 15 August 1998 to Weeks Marine Inc. Dredging was completed during the first quarter of FY '99, removing 228,000 cubic yards of material. Total operations and maintenance funds expended on this project during FY '99 was $1,494,627.72. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961. No new work dredging of entrance channel, was done, since depths provided under previous project were greater than those required under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimensions in August 1963. 7. KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, NJ & NY Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Ne~vark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $607,600,000 with an additional $415,600,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987, for Phase I. A new project cooperating agreement will be entered into on 30 January 1999 for Phase II (40 feet to 45 feet). Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to 40 feet in seven contracts was substantially completed. Contract No. 1, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is completed. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and is completed. Removal of rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay was divided in three contracts, 4A, 4B, and 4C. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and was completed in Sept. 1995. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and is complete. Contract 4C was awarded in Sept. 1994 and was completed in July 1995. Stage 2, channel deepening to 45 feet has commenced with start of work on a Limited Re-evaluation Report, which was approved Oct., 1997. First construction contract for Area 2 was awarded 16 March 1999. The second constriction control for Area 1 was awarded 4 Aug. 1999. The third construction control for Area 4A was awarded 28 Feb. 2000. 8. MAMARONECK HARBOR, NY Location. On north shore of Long Island South, 5 miles west of Connecticut state line, and 27 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12367). Previous projects. For detail see Annual Reports for 1915, 1924, and 1938, pages 1759, 141, and 160, respectively. Existing Project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Long Island Sound to Orient Point, and thence 80 feet wide to a point about 150 feet below the Boston Post Road, including an extension to northeast 300 feet long and 80 feet wide, all the widening at bends; 2-6 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT for 2 anchorages, 1 of 10-foot depth about 4 1/2 acres in extent and the second about 14 acres in area to a depth of 6 feet; and an anchorage in the West Basin 6 feet deep at mean low water with a channel of like depth and 80 feet wide connecting this. anchorage with the main channel. Section included in project, 1 3/4 miles. Mean tidal range, 6.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completion cost $258,996 exclusive of $151,044 and $43,023 expended from contributed funds, required and contributed funds, other, respectively, and amounts expended in previous projects. Local cooperation. Provisions under River and Harbor Acts of 1922 and 1935 compiled with except local interests must provide adequate and suitable spoil-disposal areas suitably diked or bulk-headed as needed. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of construction, to be paid in lump sum prior to construction final allocation of cost to be made after actual costs are determined; provide lands, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of anchorage; hold the United States free from damages; provide at all times adequate public landing facilities, open to all on equal terms, for access to the shore by users of the anchorage; and allocate and adequate portion of the anchorage to accommodate a minimum of 15 boats and provide mooring facilities therein, specifically designated for use by local craft. Assurance of compliance were furnished by the village of Mamaroneck and accepted by the District Engineer on April 3, 1962. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Revised 1978, Vol 2. Operations and results during the period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 10 feet mean low water, from Mamaroneck Harbor, with disposal of the material at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Area, was awarded in 1999. Approximately 161,935 cubic yards of material was removed between February and May of 1999. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $5,712,654.52 was expended for maintenance and advance maintenance dredging of Mamaroneck Harbor. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in October 1924 and was completed in May 1966. Work completed consisted of providing a 10 foot main channel, branch channel and anchorage area in East Basin completed in April 1933. A 6 foot connecting channel and anchorage area in West Basin completed in July 1939. An enlargement of anchorage area in East Basin toa depth of 6 feet completed in May 1966. In June 1963 and May 1966 controlling mean low water depth was 10 feet for a width varying from 100 to 80 feet in main channel from Long Island South to East Basin anchorage and thence 9 feet to upper limit including branch channel; in East Basin anchorage areas, 10 feet in 10 foot anchorage area and 6 feet in 6 foot anchorage area; in West Basin, 6 feet in 6 foot anchorage area and 6 feet in connecting channel thereto. 9. MORICHES INLET, NY Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing Project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.7 miles; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Recent provisions include an outer channel deposition basin, a west jetty scour blanket, and habitat enhancement for shore birds. Estimate of cost of work is $13,050,000 (October 1988 P.L.) including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $4,550,000 to contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all easements, rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for improvements at an overall 35% cost sharing basis. The annual Operations and Maintenance cost is estimated to be $1,860,000 of which the local share is 50% or $930,000 per year. An Agreement of Local Cooperation was executed on 30 June 1986. The New York State department of Environmental Conservation is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharfs and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future activity warrant. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging of Moriches Inlet was awarded as Option #1 to the Shinnecock Inlet dredging Contract (Weeks Marine, Inc.) for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 14 feet with 2 feet allowable overdepth below mean low water, in specified areas of the Entrance Channel and Deposition Basin at Moriches Inlet as shown on the contract drawings with placement of the 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 dredged material as beach fill on the adjacent west beach. A total of $186,187 cubic yards of sand was placed. Operation and maintenance funds expended on this project during FY 1998 was $103,083.84 in addition to $1,666.61 in matching State funds bringing total cost to $1,356,662.68. Condition as of September 30. Pre-construction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e., navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). A post authorization change was approved in September 1983 to allow construction of each project purpose separately which clarified authority to defer all purposes except navigation. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. 10. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY & VT Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, NY at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, VT. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177 respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, NY at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2- B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during fiscal year 1999 in the removal of snag and obstructions that constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $16,600. Government plant and hired labor were employed in the repair and replacement of deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $3,800 during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $8,300 were expended during FY 1999 on project condition surveys and funds in the amount of $64,400 were expended on engineering and design work associated with proposed maintenance dredging of the project channel. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 11() feet. Fender booms have been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 11. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, (PORT JERSEY CHANNEL), NJ Location. The Port Jersey Channel is the navigation channel from its confluence with Anchorage Channel to its head of navigation in Bayonne, where Global Terminal provides berthing facilities for container commerce, located within Port of New York and New Jersey. Existing Project. Deepening the existing (non-Federal) Port Jersey Channel and a turning basin at the head of navigation. The authorized project provides for deepening the existing 38- foot deep channel to a depth of 41-feet deep below mean low and generally 450 feet wide with suitable bends and turning areas to extend from deep water in the Anchorage Channel, New York Harbor, westward approximately 12,000 feet along the southern boundary of the Port Jersey peninsula, to the head of navigation in Jersey City, New Jersey. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $82.200 with and additional $28,095 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The State of New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, will enter into a Project Cooperating Agreement (PCA) with the Government. Operations and results during period, and conditions as of September 30. On Feb 2000 the Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR), which recommended the deepening of the channel to 41 feet, was submitted by Corps of Engineering Headquarters to Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works for submission to Congress. 12. NEW YORK HARBOR-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, New York, NY and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, NJ and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore 2-8 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $292,000,000 (October 1997 P.L. ) including $68,000,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $89,000,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date). A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,211. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of pier 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the city of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at the cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work was completed on the Weehawken to Edgewater Contract No. 2 at a cost of $8,490,000, and Jersey City North Contract No. 2 at a cost of $1,800,000. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Hoboken Pier B was completed at a cost of $973,590, and Jersey City North 1 was completed at a cost of $2,358,000. Weehawken-Edgewater Contract 2A was completed at a cost of $4,550,000. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2B, the Shooters Island Reach, the Arthur Kill, NY & NJ Reaches, the Bayonne 2 Reach, and the Kill Van Kull Reach. The Brooklyn 2A Reach removal contract was completed in October 1999 at a cost of $4,878,022. The Passaic River, Newark, Kearny and Passaic, NJ Reach was completed in May 1999 at a cost of $109,907. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 560,500 cubic feet (4,379 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to lIrge timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $4,888,200. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by Water Resources Development Act. removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Bayonne, Weehawken and Edgewater. The New York City work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River, along part of the Brooklyn waterfront, and at Stapleton, Staten Island. 13. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass., and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, NJ. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, and extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; and southerly entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside- Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with sidening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Seinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesand Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol.2. Operations and results during period. Implementation of management and monitoring plans for closure of the existing ocean disposal site (the Mud Dump) and operation of the recently designated Historic Area Remediation Site (HARS) with particular emphasis on capping projects; prepared supplemental NEPA documentation and design for the selected options of the Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) for The Port of New York/New Jersey. These options include selected options of the island CDF's, new CAD pits, upland disposal, innovative technologies (decontamination technologies), etc. for the medium and long term management of dredged material from the region; and continued contaminant reduction efforts recently identified under the New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program and the DMMP. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $3,437,543.96 was expended on New York Harbor in FY '99. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey peirhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944, Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 14. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327. Previous projects. For details, see 1963 Annual Report, pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively, thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing, north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike o nits northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line: and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet: mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage as Sandy Hook and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988, Vol.2. Operations and results during the period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all material except rock lying above the plane of 35 feet, with 1 foot allowable overdepth below mean low water in identified areas between the Gothal's Bridge and the Outerbridge Crossing of the Arthur Kill Channel as shown on the contract drawings with disposal 2-10 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT of the dredged material at an approved/permitted Contractorfurnished non-ocean disposal site was awarded on 6 November 1997 to ECDC Environmental, LC. Approximately 926.269 cubic yards of material was removed from NY & NJ Channels. Operation and maintenance funds expended on this project during FY '99 was $999,635.91 bringing total costs expended to date is $45,634,980.66. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing Depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by RIver and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 15. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ Location. Shoal Harbor is on the south shore of Sandy Hook Bay about 4 miles west of Sandy Hook. Compton Creek is a small stream rising on the west side of the Navesink Highlands and flowing north through meadows into Shoal Harbor. (See Coast chart 12327). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1934, and 1938, pages 211 and 265, respectively. Existing project. A 1.8 mile channel to 12 feet deep at mean low water extending from deep water in Sandy Hook Bay to first bend in creek, thence 8 feet deep to the Main Street Bridge across Compton Creek with a width of 150 feet in the bay and 75 feet inside the mouth of the creek, with widening at bends. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water up to 5.9 feet above mean high water. New work for the completed portion of the project cost $107,572 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of $77,247 expended from contributed funds. Dredging of channel in the creek to a depth of 8 feet to a point 1,000 feet upstream from Main Street Bridge is inactive and is excluded form foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954, provides local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of work, and agree to; (a) furnish, without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; and (c) deepen to 14 feet the berths at the terminals along the improved section of channel; and provided further that no work shall be undertaken until local interests have complied with the outstanding condition of local cooperation required under existing project which pertains to construction of a public wharf. Assurances of compliance by local interests with requirements under Act of September 3, 1954, dated July 30, 1956, were accepted September 25, 1956 by the District Engineer for the United States of America. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded on 31 July 1998 to Wickberg Marine Contracting Inc. for the removal and disposal of all material in Section 1 lying above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water, plus 2 foot allowable overdepth; and in Section 2 all material lying above the plane of 8 feet below mean low water in Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek with disposal of the material at the upland site as shown on contact drawings. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount o $239,088.05 was expended in FY '99. Condition as of September 30. Work under the entire existing project is about 78 percent complete. Work under active portion of the existing project was commenced in August 1936 and completed in November 1956. Work remaining to be done under the project consists of extending the 8-foot channel 1,000 feet upstream from the Main Street Bridge. 16. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The inspectors operate out of the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit, as well as investigation unauthorized construction activities. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter). 17. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 19. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-Authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) 20. ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY Location. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, in Nassau County, New York, between Jones Inlet and East Rockaway Inlet. Existing project. The project feasibility study was conducted pursuant to a resolution by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the U.S. House of Representatives that was adopted October 1, 1986. Project construction was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The authorized plan provides for storm damage protection for 7 miles of public shoreline against a 100-year storm event. Protection is provided by constructing a l 10-foot wide protective beach berm at an elevation of 10 feet above sea level backed by a 25-foot wide dune system at an elevation 15 feet above sea level. The project also includes the rehabilitation of 16 existing groins and the construction of six new groins at the eastern end of the island. In addition, the project includes periodic nourishment of the restored beaches on a 5-year cycle for a period of 50 years following initial construction. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, who funded 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. The Project Cooperation Agreement has not yet been negotiated, but the customary provisions are that local interests will provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, necessary for construction of the project, fund 35% of the total project cost, assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore, maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms, and maintain all improvements after completion of construction in accordance with Federal regulations for the economic life of the project. Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The Feasibility Report with Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed in February 1995. The Pre-construction, Engineering and Design (PED) phase was completed in September 1997. The final EIS was released for public comment in May 1998 and the record of decision was signed in December 1998. Since current administration policy does not support continued funding for shore protection projects such as Long Beach. Construction funds were not budgeted in FY 1998 or FY 1999. Congress added $2 million in FY 1998 and $7.5 million in FY 1999 to continue the design of the project and initiate construction. The local sponsors requested that the Corps of Engineers reanalyze the area between the proposed new groins and existing groin field in the City of Long Beach before starting construction. A study is underway which utilizes new modeling techniques that were unavailable during the feasibility study to finalize the groin field design. The study is scheduled to be complete in November 1999. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 21. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326). Existing project. The projects consists of nourishing 100 foot wide beach at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water from Beach 149th Street to 19th Street. Initial beach replenishment was completed in FY 1997. Periodic nourishment (5 contracts) previously took place between 1979 and 1988. Construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th St. was completed in September 1982. A Section 934 Report approved 2-12 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT in February 1994, recommended continued nourishment over a nine year period. Federal participation includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the total estimated at $64,000,000 (Oct. 1996 P.L.) The Section 934 Report also recommended a reformulation study to evaluate alternative methods of providing drainage protection to the Rockaway area. Local cooperation. Local interests have agreed to provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas: bear a portion of the total cost as a cash contribution; hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of a project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly- owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. The project cooperation agreement for additional renourishment over the nine year period was executed on 25 May 1995. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council of Environmental Quality on April 16 1971. Initial beach restoration was completed in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August, 1982. Contract for construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th street was completed in September, 1982. Periodic nourishment contracts Nos. 3, 4, and 5 were completed between 1978 and 1988. Contract No. 6 was completed by NATCO Limited Partners in November 1996. The contract included beachfill placement of approximately 3 million cubic yards of sand from Beach 19th to Beach 149th Street. 22. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, NY about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 20 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing up to 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment. Local cooperation. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local cooperating agency. The State agreed to provide necessary lands, rights-of-way and borrow areas, and furnish 30 percent of the project costs for the Interim Project along the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach of the authorized project. The State has also agreed to be the local sponsor for interim projects immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet and along Fire Island. Project history. On July 30, 1963, the State reflecting the desires of Suffolk County. requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches- Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works. State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964. the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches- Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach vicinity of Georgica Pond, and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964. the Chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works Furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 in Moriches-Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State Recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (Drainage structures first): Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and fire Island-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966: and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13. 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested the following works undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches-Shinnecock reach, beach and dine fill at 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton- Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groin in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches- Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing leveen-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report. A General Design Memo completed in 1980 recommended placement of sand fill in the existing 11 groin field and along 9,500 feet of shore to the west. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and the project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1964, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,845,565 of which $1,370,191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2. Section IA was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section IA and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section IA was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 in required contributed funds. Funds in the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase 1 study in Reach 1, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978, the Department of the Interior, supported by the other environmental resource agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6. 1978 the Council agreed and recommended project reformulation. Public meetings were held in October 1979 to delineate the scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement was reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was completed in July 1980. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at Westhampton Beach, reformulation was postponed. Two breaches (new inlets) occurred in the vulnerable Westhampton area during periods of storm tides, one in Jan. 1980, just east of the Moriches inlet, and the most recent in Dec. 1992, at the eastern end of Moriches Bay. Both breaches were filled in by contract, the last one completed in Sept. 1993, at a cost of 7 million. In April 1993, the State provided a letter of intent to participate in an interim project for the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach. Based on this agreement in 1993 on a conceptual plan for the most critically eroded reach of the authorized project, the Westhampton Interim Project, the Reformulation Study was reinitiated. A construction contract for the Westhampton Interim Project was awarded in May 1996 to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company in the amount of 16 million. The contract was substantially completed in December 1997 and included beach placement of 4 million cubic yards of sand, dune creation, fencing and grass planting, groin modifications and construction of public dine walkovers. In January 1996, a Breach Contingency Plan was approved, which provides a mechanism for rapid response to breaches along the barrier island, within the authorized project. The Reformulation Study, which has been consistently funded since 1993, is currently underway. Data has been collected including beach profile surveys and aerial topography maps of the entire 83 mile long shoreline. Initial scoping for the prepa- 2-14 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT ration of an Environmental Impact Statement has been conducted. The study is scheduled to be completed in June 2002. Based on requests from local, state and congressional interests, evaluations are underway for separable interim measures along Fire Island and immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet. 23. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ Location. Situated at the southern end of Lower New York Bay between the Raritan River and Sandy Hook, in Middlesex and Monmouth Counties, New Jersey. Shoreline area is typified by small developing communities built upon and near salt and freshwater marshes. The study area is largely located in low elevation regions with numerous small creeks providing drainage. Low-lying residential and commercial structures in the area are experiencing flooding caused by coastal storm inundation. Problem has progressively worsened due to loss of protective beaches and increased urbanization in the area with structures susceptible to flooding from rainfall and coastal storm surges, erosion and wave attack, combined with restrictions to channel flow in the tidal creeks. Existing project. Existing Federal project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 12 October 1962 as a dual purpose Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project in accordance with House Document No. 464, 86th Congress, Second session. This project provided for beach fill, groins, and levees for various sections of the study area. The constructed project consists of segmented sections of beach fill and levees surrounding the communities at Old Bridge Township and Keansburg and East Keansburg. A study was authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives, adopted August 1, 1990. The study seeks to determine the advisability to the recommendations in the authorizing report for Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor, NJDEP, is currently cost sharing a number of Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ feasibility studies with USACE: Port Monmouth, Union Beach, and Cliffwood Beach. The non- Federal sponsor would also be required to cost share in feasibility studies for the communities of Leonardo, Highlands and Keyport in order for them to proceed. (The non-Federal sponsor also operates and maintains the existing, constructed project). Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Construction of the authorized project for Old Bridge Township was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Construction of the shoreline portion of the authorized project for Keansburg and East Keansburg was initiated in 1968 and completed in 1969. Construction of the closure portion (levees, closure gate and pumping station) of the authorized project for Keansburg and East Keansburg was initiated in 1970 and completed in 1973. Cliffwood Beach and Union Beach were the only portions of the authorized project that were not constructed. After construction of the closure work all of the completed works were formally turned over to the State of New Jersey in 1974. A reconnaissance study was completed in March 1993. Subsequently, a feasibility study for Port Monmouth was initiated in February 1994, and for Union Beach and Cliffwood Beach in April 1997. In FY 1998 funds were utilized for report preparation for Port Monmouth. In addition, FY 1989 funds were also used to continue feasibility study activities for Union Beach, and to complete planning and engineering pre-feasibility activities for Leonardo. Pre-feasibility study activities for Highlands and Keyport also continued in FY 1998. Since Congress provided the funds, the feasibility study for Cliffwood Beach continued in FY 1998. Public involvement, and local coordination ongoing with the non-Federal sponsor and environmental resource agencies for the various active studies and investigations. In FY 1999 the Port Monmouth draft reported DEIS were further revised for wetland mitigation concerns. Feasibility study efforts on Union Beach, and Clifford Beach continued and initiated for Leanardo. Pre-feasibility studies at Highland, Keyport continued to be refined to provide a basis for a cost shared feasibility studies. 24. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th Street extending approximately 2300 feet into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also provides for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. The project was modified by the Intermodel Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 to include the relocation of existing comfort and lifeguard stations at full Federal expense. The total Federal cost of the project is $101,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $50,900,000. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation. In accordance with the provisions of the Project Cooperation Agreement, the sponsor will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary for construction of the project, hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. Initial construction of the beach and 37th Street jetty was completed in January, 1995. The design of the comfort and lifeguard stations was completed in 1996. Adequate funding is not available to proceed with.construction. Post-construction monitoring continued in FY '98. A study that evaluated the causes of the accelerated beach erosion downdrift of the W. 37th Street groin and identified alternatives for a solution. The report was completed in March 1998. The report recommends three alternative solutions. A draft environment assessment of the alternative is underway and is scheduled to be completed in November 1999. 25. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet-length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-670) authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Momorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost for Section 1 is $699,970,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $376,930,000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights-or-way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement for Section I was executed with the State of New Jersey on July 30, 1992. Work under Contract IA was completed in November 1995. Approximately 4.4 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract IA at an estimated cost of $21 million. Work under Contract LB was completed in October 1996. Approximately 3.8 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract LB at an estimated cost of $15.8 million. Construction on Contract 2 (Long Branch) began in May 1997 and was completed in September 1999. Plans and specifications for Contract 3 (Deal) are underway and are scheduled to be completed in June 2000. SECTION II ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan-length about 9 miles. Authorized project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated Federal cost is $462,930,000. Total estimated non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $249,270,000. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The local cooperation agreement for Section II was executed with the State of New Jersey on August 20, 1006. The contract for the Southern Reach (Belmar to Manasquan) was awarded in March 1997. Construction began in June 1997 and was completed in August 1999. The award of the Northern Reach (Asbury Park to Avon-by-the-Sea) contract was in June, 1999. Beachfill placement commenced in July 2000 and is continuing. The beachfill will be completed in December 1999. Work on the groin notching and outfall extrusions will begin after completion of the beachfill. 2-16 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter). 27. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Publ. Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (See Table 2-0 at end of chapter). FLOOD CONTROL 28. THE HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NJ Location. The project location is the Hackensack Meadowlands River Basin in Bergen and Hudson Counties, New Jersey. Existing project. The program was authorized by Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 and amended by Section 550 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The program was authorized for $5,000,000. The objective of the program is to provide design and construction assistance for the development of the Environmental Improvement Program within the Hackensack Meadowlands District of New Jersey. The intent of the program is to assist the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission in: tide gate improvements to control flooding in the Berry's Creek drainage basin, the mitigation, enhancement and acquisition of wetlands, the development and implementation of a system to provide for water quality monitoring and wetland control in the Hackensack Meadowlands River Basin. A hydraulic modeling study of the Hackensack River will be performed and it will also examine a proposed tide gate on Berry's Creek. The Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station will be performing the modeling study. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission (HMDC). Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The General Management Plan, which outlines the management process for implementing the program, was completed in October 1998. A total of $2.5 million was appropriated for the program in FY 1996. The design agreement is expected to be executed between the Corps of Engineers and the HMDC in March 2000. The modeling study is expected to take one year to complete. 29. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER WATERFRONT AND HISTORIC AREA, NJ Location. The project area is located along the west bank of the Passaic River between Bridge and Brill Streets in the City of Newark, New Jersey. This reach of the Passaic River is eroded, deteriorated and environmentally degraded due to past heavy commercial and industrial use and flooding. The most recent flooding occurred in December 1992. In light of the renewal of the commercial downtown area of Newark near the Passaic River, the project area is viewed and an environmental resource to be restored. Authorized project. The project was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1990 (Public Law 101-640) as an element of the Passaic River Flood Damage Reduction Project on November 28, 1999, modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580) by extending the project area, and further modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). The project has three phases. The first phase will provide 6,000 feet of new bulkhead, 3,200 feet of restored riverbank and wetlands. The second phase adds a 9,200-foot waterfront walkway and the third phase adds park facilities, plazas and landscaping. Links to the Arts Center, Riverbank Park, and other sites will also be provided. The project will reduce the flooding and erosion and provide environmental restoration, recreation and economic development benefits. The cost of the first phase is $37,300,000, adding the second phase increases the cost to $60,000,000 and the third phase brings the total project cost to $78,800,000. The sponsor of the first phase is the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and cost sharing is set a 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. The State may reduce its share through credit provisions in WRDA 1992. The credit consists of the value of lands in the basin that the State puts into wetlands bank. Local cooperation. Project will be operated and maintained by sponsor as each portion is completed. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. Construction on the first phase started in September 1999. A formal ground breaking was held in November 1999. Additional appropriations will be required to complete the first phase. Interest is also being expressed by Newark to begin the second phase, the walkway. A sponsor would be required and funds appropriated before and action can be taken on the second phase. 30. NORTH ELLENVILLE, NY Location. In Ellenville, NY, on Beer Kill and Fantine Kill, at their confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanoch, NY, about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle). Existing project. Improvement includes construction of levees and floodwalls along Beer Kill and Fantine Kill-I capping retaining walls along Beer Kill; removing concrete dam, 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 channel improvements and stream diversion on Fantine Kill; providing interior drainage including diversion ditches, drainage structures, ponding areas; alteration of 6 bridges: and relocating structures and utilities. The project was completed in 1975. Since that time severe storms in March 1980 and April 1987 caused erosion of the riprap bank protection and significant damage to the project floodwalls and levees. Subsequent repairs to damaged areas were undertaken in 1981- 82, 1987-88 and in 1996-97 under PL-84-99 authority. A Design Deficiency Report was prepared recommending repair, reinforcement, and replacement of undermined floodwalls, placement of tiprap protection along the Beer Kill Channel bottom and toes of banks; repair and replacement of riprap along the side slopes and toes of the levees, and possible removal of a rock outcrop to reduce erosive velocities. The current Federal cost estimate is $6,100,000 (Oct. 94-P.L.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local Cooperation were received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in 1968 and 1970. An additional Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in November 1987 to cover the repairs accomplished through the PL-84-99 effort. In a letter dated 9 November 1990, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation indicated their willingness to participate and act as local sponsor under the terms of Section 414 of the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. The Project Cooperation Agency (PCA) was executed in January 1995. Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was completed in September 1996 and the project was turned over to the New York department of Environmental Conservation in February 1997. Inspections are held annually. 31. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, NY Location. The project location is the New York City Watershed, which is located within the following counties in New York State: Delaware, Greene, Schoharie, Ulster, Sullivan, Westchester, Putnam and Dutchess. Existing project. The program was authorized by Section 552 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 and amended in WRDA 1999. The program was authorized for $42,500,000 in Federal funds. The objective of the program is to provide design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in the New York City Watershed, including projects for water supply, storage, treatment and distribution facilities and surface water resource protection and development. Twenty-three projects have been certified by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and recommended for implementation. The types of projects include stream restoration, installation of sanitary sewer lines, stromwater studies, pathogen monitoring, planning and implementation of agricultural non-point source pollution reduction and watershed protection training. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the NYDEC. The projects will be accomplished by the local sponsors, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, municipalities and counties. Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The General Management Plan, which outlines the management process for implementing the program, was completed in September 1998. A total of $7.0 million has been appropriated for the program in FY 1997 through 2000. The request for proposals, under which the proposed projects were submitted, evaluated and certified for implementation, was completed in February 1999. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the first projects, the Prattsville Stream Management Project, and the Greene County GIS Mapping were executed in December 1999 and January 2000 respectfully. Discussions with the local sponsors and negotiations of the PCA's for the other certified projects is underway. 32. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ & NY Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide-and contains portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 de-snagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, NJ. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ, was completed in 1954 at'a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. geological Survey, The State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. 2-18 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did not receive widespread public support. In 1976, Congress authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was provided in House Report 94-1702. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, NJ, and Suffern, NY, Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, NJ, the Ramapo River at Oakland, NJ, and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, NJ. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction began on the Molly Ann's Brook project in 1995. The Ramapo River at Oakland project received construction funds in Fiscal year 1995 and was reauthorized in WRDA 1996. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The final EIS was Filed with EPA in December 1988. Section 101(a) 18 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101-640), as modified by section 102(p) of WRDA '92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood walls channel modification, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River Basin. Preconstruction Engineering and Design for the Passaic River Flood Protection Project was initiated in FY 1989 and is continuing with preparation of a General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement with accompanying project cost estimate, and update of buy-out plans. A draft report was completed in Sept. 1995. The final report was completed in July 1996 with the State's decision to implenlent the natural flood storage areas at this time. Engineering and design for the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront Part and Historic Area project element, consisting of environmental and streambank restoration measures in the city of Newark was completed in May 1996. Condition as of September 30. Construction is continuing on Molly Ann's Brook, the Ramapo River at Oakland, Joseph G. Minish Passaic River and Waterfront Park. The purchases of the national flood storage areas is underway. The Saddle River and Mahwah River projects are on hold pending local support. 33. PRESERVATION OF NATURAL FLOOD STORAGE - PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION REPORT, NJ Location. Flooding has long been a problem in the Passaic River Basin. Since colonial times, floods have claimed lives and damaged property. The most severe flood, the "flood of record", occurred in 1903, and more recent floods in 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, two in 1975, 1984 and 1992 were sufficiently devastating to warrant Federal Disaster declarations. The flood of 1984 resulted in the loss of three lives and caused $493 million in damages (October 1994 dollars). Authorized project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been working on plans to reduce flooding in the basin since 1936, but no plan has yet been implemented. Congress authorized a new study of the Passaic River Basin for the State of New Jersey in the Water Resources Department Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587) which led to a plan authorized in WRDA 1990 and modified in WRDA 1992. The project includes several elements (see separate fact sheet on Passaic River). The element described herein is the Preservation of Natural Flood Storage Areas which the State has asked to Corps to implement. The Preservation element includes the acquisition of 5,350 acres of natural storage areas. 5,200 acres of which are wetlands and could conceivably be developed, worsening existing flood problems. The State of New Jersey has an agreement with the Corps to continue to protect 6,300 floodway acred, thus avoiding any secondary development. About 9,500 acres of the Central Basin are already protected as designated parkland, bringing the total of natural storage areas that would be permanently protected with the project to 21,000 acres. The Preservation element will prevent flood damages from becoming worse. It will not reduce flooding in the Passaic River Basin. The cost sharing is set a 75% Federal and 25% State. The State may reduce its share by applying credits included in the authorization. Local cooperation. Project lands will be operated and maintained by non-Federal sponsors as each parcel is acquired. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The General Design Memorandum for the element was completed in July 1996 and the State has requested that the Corps proceed with its implementation at a cost of $19.8 million dollars. Currently, the Corps has completed a Real Estate Design Memorandum for purchasing the preserva- 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 tion lands and is negotiating a Project Cooperation Agreement with the State as a non-Federal sponsor. Funds are available to begin purchases once the Agreement is signed. Purchases started in spring 2000 and continue. Total estimated Federal cost is $19,300,000. Total non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $1,700,000. 34. RAMAPO RIVER AT OAKLAND, NJ Location. The project involves the construction of features for flood protection along the Ramapo River from Pompton Lake in Wayne Township and the Borough of Pompton Lakes, upstream through the Borough of Oakland to West Oakland Avenue, a distance of 3.3 miles. The principal problem along the Ramapo River is flooding caused by backwater effect produced by the Pompton Lake Dam, the hydraulic construction produced by bridges crossing the river, and insufficient channel capacity. Flooding has occurred frequently, with the most recent events in 1968, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1993, and as recently as January of last year. Authorized project. The Ramapo River was studied as part of the Passaic River Basin Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study which was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976). Congressional guidance for the conduct of the study is included in House of Representatives Report 94-1702. The study was authorized for construction under the Water Resources Development;ent Act (WRDA) of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized in WRDA 1996 (PL 104-303). The sponsor is the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The authorized plan for flood damage reduction along the study area includes channel modification of 5,800 feet of the Ramapo River. The authorized plan also calls for the installation of flood control gates at the existing Pompton Lake Dam. Mitigation for the environmental impacts of the plan include the creation of a five-acre wetland in Potash Lake. The recommended plan would provide a consistent 40-year level of protection to the project area. The plan has an estimated cost of $13,100,000. The cost is shared by the Federal Government (75%) and the State (25%). The State share includes the cost for all lands, easements, and rights-of-way as well as a cash contribution. The State share may be reduced through the use of credits available for Passaic River Basin projects. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsor will operate and maintain project once construction is complete and project is turned-over to sponsor. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. Engineering and design commenced in October 1987. The final General Design Memorandum was completed in May 1994 and approved in July 1994. Permits were issued in January 1999. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in April 1999. Construction on the channel modification started in spring 2000. Total estimated Federal cost is $11,700,000. Total estimated non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $1,400,000 35. RARITAN RIVER BASIN GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ Location. The Green Brook Basin lies in central New Jersey within the counties of Somerset, Middlesex and Union and is one of the major tributaries in the Raritan River Basin. The Green Brook, which originates in the Watchung Mountains, has a 65-square mile watershed. The bell shaped basin widens markedly as Green Brook flows southwesterly to its mouth at the Raritan River. Project History. The Green Brook Flood Control Project is the result of efforts over the past three decades by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, other Federal agencies, state and local agencies, civic organizations and the general public. In 1968, a reconnaissance investigation was conducted, under the Corps of Engineers Continuing Authority Program for small projects, for Ambrose, Bound and Bonygutt Brooks. The resulting report recommended further study at all three locations. Detailed project reports concluded that individual flood protection projects were not economically feasible at any of the locations. Subsequently, record floods occurred in 1971 and again in 1973, causing catastrophic damage throughout the basin. As a result of the devastating events, the need for basinwide studies of the entire Green Brook Basin was apparent. The Corps of Engineers, North Atlantic Division (NAD) issued the Feasibility Report for Flood Control, Green Brook Sub-Basin, dated August 1980. The plan recommended in this report consisted of a system of levees and floodwalls to provide protection against a 150-year flood in the lower portion of the Green Brook Basin only. A more comprehensive, basinwide solution would have also extended 150-year protection to the upper and Stony Brook portions of the basin. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) reviewed the NAD report and issued its report on 16 March 1981, in which they endorsed all plan formulation decisions in the 1980 Feasibility Report. However, the BERH also stated the "the recommended 150-year level of protection is inadequate for this highly urbanized floodplain". Th avoid catastrophic consequences of levee overtopping, the BERH recommended protection to 500- year level. The Chief of Engineers Report dated 4 September 1981. In February 1984, the Secretary of the Army expressed the administration's views in his letter transmitting the report to Congress in which he recommended that the August 1980 report should be authorized. The Water Resources Act of 1986 authorized construction of a project, providing protection in all three portions of the Green Brook Basin. Section 401a of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986 authorizes construction of 2-20 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT the Green Brook Flood Control Project for the Green Brook Sub-basin, which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Green Brook Flood Control Project combines levees, floodwalls, channel modification, flood proofing, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 13 municipalities in the Green Brook Subbasin. On the basis of this authorization, funds were budgeted and appropriated for preconstruction engineering and design. Surveying, mapping and other studies necessary to provide the basis for actual construction commenced toward the end of 1986. However, delays were incurred due to conflict between the needs and desires of the non-Federal sponsor and national economic development which affected the quest for a comprehensible implementable plan. In January 1994, a general reevaluation study was initiated, the draft General Reevaluation Report was issued in December 1996 and opened for public comment for the period between January 7 - March 7, 1997. As a result comments expressed with significant concerns over the flood protection plan proposed for the upper portion of the basin, the Corps and the NJDEP agreed to defer action on the flood protection plan for the upper portion of the basin. The Final General Reevaluation Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement was approved in May 1997 with the support of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) who is the non-Federal sponsor for the project. In FY 1998, an Upper Basin Task Force (UBTF) was formulated to develop potential plan alternatives to the upper basin. The UBTF released their final report on November 12, 1998. Preconstruction Engineering and Design for the Green Brook Flood Control Project was initiated in FY 1997 and NJDEP is anticipating a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the Government to be executed in 3rd quarter 1999. Condition as of September 30. Construction is scheduled to begin in the lower portion of the basin in 1999 which includes demolition and replacement of a bridge in the Borough of Bound Brook, flood proofing measures in the Borough of Middlesex along Prospect Place, and construction of levee system. A Project Study Plan (PSP) is being formulated to determine the feasibility of the alternatives discussed in the UBTF report and will be completed 3rd quarter 1999. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of the following completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. New England Adams, MA - Hoosic River Bennington, VT - Roaring Branch, Walloomsac River East Barre Dam, VT - Jail Branch Winooski River Montpelier Dam, VT - Winooski River North Adams, MA - Hoosic River Richford, VT - Missiquoi River Waterbury Dam, VT - Little River Wrightsville Dam, VT - North Branch, Winooski River Inspection Date Sept. 99 Sept. 99 Sept. 99 Sept. 99 Sept. 99 Sept. 99 Sept. 99 Sept. 99 NY - NJ Areas * E. Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Oct. 98 Elizabeth, NJ - Elizabeth River NI * Fire Is. Inlet to Montauk Pt., NY Oct. 98 Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk River Oct. 98 Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek Oct. 98 Hoosic Falls, NY - Hoosic River Oct. 98 Kingston, NY - Esopus Creek Oct. 98 North Ellenville, NY - Beer & Fantine Kills & Snadburg Creek Oct. 98 Rahway, NJ - Rahway River, S. Branch Rahway River NI * Raritan Bay & sandy Hook Bay, NJ Old Bridge, Keansburg & Middletown, NJ NI Rosendale, NY - Roundout Creek Oct. 98 So. Amsterdam, NY - So. Chuctanunda Creek & Mohawk River Oct. 98 So. Orange NJ - E. Branch, Rahway River NI Yonkers, NY - Saw Mill River Oct. 98 Chappaqua, NY - Saw Mill River Nov. 98 Ardsley, NY - Saw Mill River Nov. 98 Sandy Hook to Barnagat Inlet, NJ NI * Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Projects NI - Not Inspected FY 1997 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended (Pre-authorization) See Table 2-P at end of chapter). 2-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons learned from previous disasters, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response planning and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York DIstrict conducted field investigations, provided technical assistance and sandbags to local and county government in response to flooding events. In response to Presidential disaster declarations under P.L. 93-288 the New York District received mission assignments from the Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA) for generator repair and servicing during the Jan. 1998 NY ice storm and environmental technical assistance during the June 1998 flash flooding in NY. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 39. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $338,163 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 41. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Acts (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-22 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 2-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 September 30(), 1999 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. East Rockaway Inlet, NY 3. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY 4. Hudson River, NY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Hudson River, NY New Work (New York City to Approp. Waterford: Athens Channel) Cost 6. Jamaica Bay, NY New Work Approp. Cost 7. Kill Van Kull-Newark 8. Mamaroneck Harbor, NY 9. Moriches Inlet, NY 10. Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 131,523 86,771 145,377 3,189 2,330,183 ' 2,324,573 ' 83,969 533,334 2,360,000 463,000 2,734,000 2,052,000 2,377,520 479,000 2,733,537 2,067,751 -290,000 5,304,194 -291,724 5,270,950 254,000 2,142,000 250,173 2,130,088 268,000 3,605,000 158,315 1,710,338 335,000 706,000 -180,355 695,277 3,486,000 1,895,000 3,689,000 2,655,000 3,501,224 1,713,221 3,776,614 2,703,565 300,000 8,700,000 290,000 - 30,914 192,216 12,737 635,000 990,000 395,000 1,455,000 637,471 989,192 356,205 1,494,628 2,000,000 1,412,959 1,299,000 29,096,000 2,664,007 2,030,721 1,094,175 10,398,616 - - - 5,714,000 - - - 5,712,297 1,490,000 -46,000 1,536,336 383,395 30,483 5,120 1,115,000 -50,000 960,654 103,084 45,000 46,000 46,334 28,837 96,275 93,00() 93,226 93,784 18,679,560 18,692,113 26,773,128 24,743,599 24,364,050 23,888,941 44,249,800 .- 44,249,865 63,604,4506 63,439,698 9,299,000 235,867 4,545,750 4,454,750 13,794,750 13,771,686 294,093,886 274,136,853 513,764 513,764 7,093,087 7,091,258 9,801,000 9,773,444 1,074,422 1,073,460 681,811 681,811 ' 1,749,365 1,669,796 2-24 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 September 30, 1999 11. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, 12. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift 13. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas 14. New York and New Jersey Channels 15. Shoal Harbor/ Compton Creek, NJ 16. Supervisor of New York Harbor 20. Long Beach Island NY 21. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY 22. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 23. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ 24. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY 25. Sandy Hook to Bamegat Inlet, NJ New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 34,000 322,000 140,258 252,578 542,000 -105,000 1,860,052 741,285 563,000 649,000 463,110 631,652 - 200,000 456,393 3,277,738 4,978,000 4,623,000 4,810,000 4,880,000 4,986,697 4,570,944 4,859,837 4,888,200 6,475,000 9,545,000 8,544,000 3,260,000 6,471,462 9,515,720 8,442,420 3,437,544 44,000 3,453,000 44,394,000 985,000 42,601 3,353,643 44,469,574 999,636 850,000 220,222 849,874 239,088 712,000 730,000 747,000 740,000 709,432 726,567 729,765 763,192 239,000 381,000 362,198 337,517 4,594,000 1,228,000 9,150,382 2,396,586 8538,000 15,193,000 9,071,276 13,765,050 21,000 20,868 130 859,040 884,000 466,632 651,110 563,000 569,000 234,115 884,663 4,510,000 3,591,000 7,607,472 3,697,967 188,000 139,000 25,932 17,884 -700,000 300,000 1,639,000 1,644000 1,206,038 607,193 715,734 703,188 12,958,000 35,929,573 17,700,877 27,166,129 22,696,000 21,007,000 28,394,251 23,399,243 2,021,00() 1,832,716 45,741,000 45,685,675 113,641,250 "' 108,907,973 45,009,710 45,009,710 " 107,143,170 107,130,536 73,052,435 73,052,435 46,893,090 46,923,159 124,572 124,572 2,892,940 2,911,893 37,259,960 37,258,038 2,782,040 2,075,214 52,366,000 50,816,306 58,479,439 57,464,242 113,970 143,753 1,093,000 805,219 21,284,765 17,884,215 14 140,008,573 134,812,038 2-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 September 30, 1999 28. Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ 29. Joseph G. Minish Waterfront Park, NJ 30. North Ellenville, NY 31. New York City Watershed, NY 32. Passaic Mainstem NJ 33. Preservation of Natural Storage Areas, NJ 34. Ramapo at Oakland NJ 35. Raritan RIver Basin Green Brook Sub-basin New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts 3. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. Additional NY State Funds were $200,000 in 1990, $581,000 in 1991, $611,574 in 1996, $2,093,194 in 1997, and $1,280,000 in 1999. 4. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 5. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 6. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, NY, under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 7. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 20,253 187,737 21,252 47,875 - 900,000 3,000,000 3,800,000 331,157 594,915 289,160 1,921,000 -172,000 1,894,610 24,228 1,000,000 - 51,656 - -1,400,000 1,767,021 611,699 - 500,000 - . 104,747 52,283 96,000 57,765 2,400 109,242 6,975 84,734 50,000 930,000 136,616 71,798 -26,000 237,000 467,000 2,290,000 22,599 113,710 288,073 216,021 2,681,000 2,780,000 2,911,000 2.706,000 4,031,169 3,090,080 2,157,946 2,244,279 2,500,000 278,828 7,700,000 '6 1,215,232 3,240,000 3,222,354 1,096,000 218,663 63,459,669 63,023,672 1,480,000 313,158 4,983,000 2,578,356 29,615,610 28,275,363 8. Includes $72,817,927 from contributed funds. 9. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 10. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O & M funds.) 11. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 12. Includes $22,777,035 from contributed funds. 13. Includes $8,700,000 contributed funds. 14. Includes $6,600,000 from contributed funds. 15. Includes $33,500,000 from contributed funds. 16. Includes $800,000 from contributed funds. 2-26 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document River and Harbor Act of 1959 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. Section 104 and Harbor Provided that all research and planning cost to be borne fully by Act of 1958 the United States Section 302 River and Harbor Act of 1965 Modified project to include control of waterchestnut July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act March 1988 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 East Rockaway Inlet, NY (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY (See Section 3 of Text) construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches 14 foot channel with sand placed along Gilgo Beach HUDSON RIVER, NY (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State Lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong.. 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. 2-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document September, 1996 Rivers and WRDA, 1997 HUDSON RIVER AT ATHENS, NY (See Section 5 of Text) The District will coordinate the assessment report to address the Rivers & Harbors Act of 191() need for additional formulation and economic analysis to modified by Section 110 of the determine economic viability. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997 June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 JAMAICA BAY, NY (See Section 6 of Text) Construction of I jetty. Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and I riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches H. Doc 1488, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 665, 80th Cong. Fy 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. September 22, 1922 August 20, 1935 July 14, 1960 KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, NJ & NY (See Section 7 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 45 feet. MAMARONECK HARBOR, NY (See Section 8 of Text) Dredging 10-foot channel and anchorage Dredging 6-foot anchorage in West Basin and its approach channel. Dredging 6-foot anchorage in East Basin MORICHES INLET, NY (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in inlet and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay and 2 jetties. PL 99-662 PL 91-611 H. Doc. 651, 66th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 74th Cong., 1st sess. ' H. Doc. 209. 86th Cong., 2nd sess.' 'Contains latest published maps H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess. August 8, 1917 WRDA 1986 NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY, AND VERMONT (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS (PORT JERSEY), NJ (See Section 11 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channel and turning basin Rivers & Harbor Committee PL 99-662 2-28 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document March 14, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 August 8, 1917 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 October 27, 1965 March 31, 1982 NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 12 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore Structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore Structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 13 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30"feet deep for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel). P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887, p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc-159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay Removal of Craven Shoal Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet Dredging South Channel, elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage, Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of Anchorage channel. 2-29 H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 557, 64th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Commerce Doc. 75th Cong., 1 sess. S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong., Ist sess. OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 September 3, 1954 October 1, 1986 NEW YORK AND JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 14 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., Doc. 17, 71st. Cong., 2nd sess. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek 1st sess. to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., Piles Creek 1st sess. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a H. Doc. 108, 98th Cong., Minimum width of 1,000 feet 1st sess. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NY (See Section 15 of Text) 8-foot channel from the first bend in the creek to Main St. Bridge H. Doc. 58, 73rd Cong., Ist sess. Extension of 8-foot channel to 1,000 feet upstream from H. Doc. 673, 76, Cong., Main St. Bridge 1st sess. 12-foot channel in bay to the first bend in the creek H. Doc. 89, 82nd Cong., Ist sess. ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY (See Section 20 of Text) Storm damage protection, rehabilitation of existing groins and Section 101(a) 21 construction of new groins of WRDA 1996 1974 & 1986 Water Resources Development Acts 1960 River & Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, NY (See Section 21 of Text) Beach nourishment of 100 to 200 foot wide beach at elevation 10 feet MSL FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY (See Section 22 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of first costs H. Doc. 425 86th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 1986 and 1992 Water Resources Development Acts October 12, 1962 RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK, NJ (See Section 23 of Text) This project provides for beach fill, groins, and levees for various Flood Control Act of 1962 sections of the study area. H. Doc. 464, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. The study seeks to determine the advisability of changes to the recommendation Section 506 of WRDA 1996 2-30 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 July 3, 1958 1988 Water Resources Development Act February, 1996 November 28, 1990 1962 Flood Control Act 1990 Water Resources Development Act April, 1997 1976, 1990 & 1992 Water Resource Dev. Acts ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) NY (See Section 24 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins a W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 25 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of H. Doc. 332, 85th Cong., 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and 2nd sess., modified by Appr. Act extension of 14 existing groins for Energy & Water Dev. for FY "85 HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ (See Section 28 of Text) Tide gate improvements to control flooding in the Berry's WRDA of 1992, sect. 324 Creed damage basin, the mitigation enhancement and Amended by WRDA of 1996 acquisition of wetlands, the development and implementation of sect. 550 a system to provide for water quality monitoring and wetland monitoring, storm water management and watershed clean-up. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC'RIVER WATERFRONT PARK AND HISTORIC AREAS, NJ (See Section 29 of Text) The first phase restores riverbanks and wetlands. The second phase WRDA 1990; PL 101-640 adds 9,200 foot waterfront walkway and third phase adds park WRDA 1992: PL 101-580 facilities, plazas and landscaping WRDA 1996; PL 104-303 NORTH ELLENVILLE, NY (See Section 30 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, removing concrete dam, stream diversion, S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., interior drainage structures. Subsequent damage repairs. 2nd sess. PL-84-99 NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY (See Section 31 of Text) Provide design and construction assistance for water-related WRDA 1996, sect. 552 environmental infrastructure and resource protection CR52, HR. 36 PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ (See Section 32 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study; involving reformulation H. Rpt. 94-1702 of plans for flood control and water resource management PRESERVATION OF NATURAL FLOOD STORAGE PASSAIC RIVER, NJ (See Section 33 of Text) The preservation element includes acquisitions 5,350 acres of natural storage area, 5,200 acres of which are wetlands and could conceivably be developed RAMAPO AT OAKLAND, NJ (See Section 34 of Text) Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study was authorized. Congressional guidance for the conduct of the study. The study was authorized for construction. WRDA of 1976; PL 94-587 WRDA of 1990 WRDA of 1996 WRDA of 1976: PL 94-587 WRDA of 1986: PL 99-662 WRDA of 1996: PL 104-303 March 16, 1981 February, 1984 RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREENBROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ (See Section 35 of Text) Recommended 150 year flood protection in lower portion. Recommended protection to 500 year level. Authorizes construction WRDA 1986, sect. 401(a) of Greenbrook Flood Control. Flood control combines levees, flood walls, channel modification, flood proofing, and natural flood storage to provide protection. 2-31 October 22, 1976 October 22, 1976 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, NY FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford 2.2 miles Above Battery, New York City 152.6 miles Locks: Clear Width 44.4 feet Greatest length available for full width 492.5 feet Lift at lowest stages 17.3 feet Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) 16.3 feet Lower (at lowest low water) 13.0 feet Character of foundation: Rock King of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES - FY 1999 1. Number of Patrols: a. Shore 101 b. Vessel 180 c. Air (helicopter) 0 2. Number of Inspections: a. Shore Facilities 125 b. Vessels 104 3. Disposition of Cases: a. Voluntary Restoration 29 b. After-the-Fact Permit Applications Accepted 30 c. Permit Not Required or Already Under Permit 53 d. Submitted for Litigation to OCE or U.S. Attorney 1 e. Other Misc. 40 f. Cases Pending as of 10/1/98 156 309 2-32 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 99 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED ..NEW JERSEY Keyport Harbor ....................................................... ........... Apr/May 99 Matawan Creek.................. ................... ........ ......... ........... Apr/May99 Newark Bay-Main Channel, NJ .................................. .................... Oct 98/May 99 Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic River ..................................................... Oct/Nov 99 Raritan River ........................................................ ............ Apr/May 99 Shark River ....................................... ................... ............... May/Jun 99 Shoal Harobr & Compton Creek ......................................................... Jan/May 99 Shrewsbury River ................................................................... Mar/Apr99 NEW YORK Arthur Kill ....................................................... ...................... Dec 99 Bayridge & Red Hook Channel, NY............................................................. Mar 99 Bronx River.........................................................................................Feb98 Coney Island Channel ....................... ....... ....... ........ .................. Feb 99 East River ...................................... ...................... .. ............ Feb99 Fire Island Jetty .................................................................. 20 Feb - 18Mar99 Glen Cove Creek ................................ .................................. Apr99 Great South Bay..........................................................................Jun/Jul 99 Hudson River ........................................................... ......... Mar99 Huntington Harbor .................................................................... Mar 98 Jamaica Bay ...................................................................... Jul/Aug 99 Jones Inlet .................................... ............... ............... Apr/Jun 99 Lake Montauk Harbor .......................................... .......................... Mar99 Mamaroneck Harbor ....................................... .................... ....... Jun 99 Mattituck Harbor ............... .............................................. Apr99 New York Harbor ........................................................... ............ Jul99 New York & New Jersey Channel ........................................................ Dec 98/May 99 Newton Creek.............................................................................Nov 98 Sheepshead Bay ...................................... ................................. Nov/Dec 98 Westchester Creek..........................................................................May 99 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1999 was $2,354,363. 2-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, NY Bronx River, NY Browns Creek, NY Burlington Harbor, VT Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT Cheesequake Creek, NJ Coney Island Channel, NY Coney Island Creek, NY East River, NY East Rockaway Inlet, NY Echo Bay Harbor, NY Fire Island Inlet, NY Flushing Bay & Creek, NY Gordon's Landing, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Great Chazy River, NY Great Kills Harbor, NY Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY Greenport Harbor, NY Harlem River, NY Hempstead Harbor, NY Hudson River Channel, NY Huntington Harbor, NY Keyport Harbor, NJ Lake Montauk, NY Larchmont Harbor, NY Little Neck Bay, NY Mamaroreck Harbor, NY Matawan Creek, NJ Mattituck Harbor, NY Milton Harbor, NY Newton Creek, NY New Rochelle Harbor, NY New York State Barge Canal, NY Northport Harbor, NY Peconic River, NY Peekskill Harbor, NY Plattsburgh Harbor, NY Port Chester Harbor, NY Port Henry Harbor, NY Port Jefferson Harbor, NY Raritan River, NJ Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, NJ Roundout Harbor, NY Rouses Point, Lake Champlain. NY Sag Harbor, NY 1992 1991 1995 1966 1909 1953 1973 1952 1997 1997 1953 1973 1997 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1953 1969 1993 1997 1953 1990 1991 1970 1969 1990 1984 1990 1984 1986 1971 1988 1956 1953 1951 1986 1990 1931 1977 1991 1991 1989 1895 1964 $5,523,297 1,149,946 33,976 2 706,414 4 31,000 40,000 111,371 69,489 32,723,662 '0 83,969 64,584 594,355 2,102,905 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301 33,562,640 .0 74,681 3,616,119 3,687.949 6,771,870 91,081 40,475 791,680 76,065 1,741,210"' 513,764 21,000 177,925 151,373 1,168,354 73,214 8 .- 78.644 25,000 19,400 198.415 433.470 " 69.406 221,12831 1,551.470 810.500 142.437 98,468 212.805 :" 41,200,035 3,802,517 1,072,040 303,555 1,288 210,675 423,148 6,203 8,225,184 16,624,362 21,571 2,908,786 8,878,900 115 394,004 292,919 88,029 457 21,720 493,491 76,497 37,136,037 57,527 1,417.437 1,288,163 267,768 537 1,351,086 315.613 1,417,832 1,057,26 1,760,745 212.411 61,487 116.500 66.037 256,415 1.742.097 1.299 359.294 16.114.463 3.965.631 3. 185.437 249 11.710 2-34 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, NJ St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, VT Saugerties Harbor, NY Shark River, NJ Sheepshead Bay, NY Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, NY Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY Wallabout Channel, NY Wappinger Creek, NY Washington Canal and South River, NJ Woodbridge Creek, NJ 1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works funds. 4. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,415,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $6,187,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $104,805 for'new work expended from contributed funds. 1985 1991 1917 1988 1987 1948 1990 1973 1895 1953 1950 1953 1953 508,936 56,479 3,125 81,905 '8 150,000 33,828 124,572 7,730,476 7,000 18,174 13,000 206,116 0 48,823 4,002,330 679,916 385 429,180 1,254,813 64,078 1,822,938 o 36,312 44,691 212,827 178,398 15. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 expended from public works funds. 16. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Included $4,456,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. 2-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of NJ, Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet' 1959 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ 1981 $11,061,256 262 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY' 1981 18,044,667 217,900 1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec. 21) 2. Listed since 1982 as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec. 4) TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass.' Ardsley, NY Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. '. East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' Elizabeth, NJ Herkimer, NY Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, NY' Lamoille River, Vt: Hardwich Dams" Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt "' North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. Rahway, NJ Rahway, South Branch, NJ Rosendale, NY Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, NY Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, NY South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, NY South Ellenville, NY South Orange, NJ Staten Island, NY Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY ' Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River, Vt. Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers. NY 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. 4. Inactive. 1964 1990 1959 1963 1985 1973 1956 1939 1990 1965 1968 1971 1979 1975 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 6,282,307 5,477,281 363,515 2,898,334 54,374,070 1,249,530 1,064,626 17,888,670 238,169 15,572,988 ' 973,142 8 15,863,723 3,684,966 109,702 62,917 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 664,998 142,075 1,438,845 5,897,427 1,549,929 113,754,475 "' 8,200 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized. 10. Includes $622,8176 contributed funds. 2-36 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class FY 99 Cost Navigation Studies $6,365,641 Flood Control Studies 595,064 Beach Erosion Studies 1,189,160 Special Studies' 284,692 TOTAL 8,434,557 1. Includes watershed/ecosystems, special investigations, FERC licensing activities, Intra Army water resources, Nat'i Estuary studies, Marine Fisheries Service, Planning Ass't to States, Coord. studies of other agencies. TABLE 2-K PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Authorized Projects FY 99 Cost Navigation Arthur Kill Channel - Howland Hook Terminal, NY & NJ $704,760 Flood Control Green Brook Sub-Basin, NJ $21,086 Lower Saddle River, NJ 6,827 Passaic River Mainstem, NJ 84,734 Passaic River Mainstem 71,799 Preservation of Natural Flood Storage Areas, NJ TOTAL 889,206 TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Study Class FY 99 Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $39,876 Flood Plain Management Unit 29,847 Camp Robinson, NY 33,567 Detention/Retention Study, VT 27,602 Kaaterskill Creek, NY 24,000 Quick Response 7,904 Bryant Park, VT 10,229 Searcy Park, NY 28,756 Taylor Loop Creeks, NY 48,558 Diamond Mills, NY 28,697 Pine Grove Lake, NY 29,852 Chazy Lake, NY 29,725 TOTAL 338,163 2-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Operation See Annual And Funds And Projects Report for Authority Expended Construction Maintenance Bennington, VT (1936 & 41 Acts) 1974 670,000 Bronx River, NY 1981 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 1,159,946 2 1,947,853 Brown's Creek, NY 1980 Aug. 1977 33,976 33,976 8 505,369 Cheesequake Creek, NJ 1953 Aug. 1982 40,000 40,000 30,675 Coney Island Creek, NY 46 1952 Aug. 1982 69,489 69,489 1,622 East Chester Creek, NY (1950 Act) 1992 July 1992 - - - East Rockaway (Devs) Inlet, NY 1963 Aug. 1977 3,503,969 " 100,000- East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet 1976 1988 - 1,185,365- and Jamaica Bay, NY (Part 11) Elizabeth, NJ 1948 Aug. 1977 60,481 60,481 59,391 Glen Cove Harbor, NY 1966 Aug. 1977 165,882 165,882" 1 2,455 Hempstead Harbor, NY (68 Act) 14 1989 Jan. 1990 - 39,468 76,497 Hudson RIver, NYC to Albany (12 ft, 27 ft) 18 1982 Aug. 1987 - - - Huntington Harbor, NY 1953 Aug. 1977 49,035 68,581a - 51,566 Irvington Harbor, NY 1947 Aug. 1977 -- Lamoille River, VT 1939 Aug. 1977 49,837 49,837- Lemon Creek, NY 1937 1988 - 6,621 1,621 Manhasset Bay, NY 1948 1988 - - 4,636 Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) 1984 1988 21,000 257,237 N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY 1979 Jan. 1990 - - Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic 1982 Aug. 1982 - - River, NJ 16 NY & NJ Channels 4.18 1982 Aug. 1982 - - Orowoc Creek, NY 1949 1988 - - 4.951 Otter Creek, VT 1937 Jan. 1990 - - Perth Amboy, NJ 1966 Jan. 1990 - - Port Chester Harbor, NY 2.3 1967 Aug. 1977 433,470 433,470' 441,656 Port Jefferson Hbr. NY (1890, 1930 & 68 Acts) 1977 Jan. 1990 - - Rahway River, NJ6.' 1948 Aug. 1982 - 37,000' 307 Raritan River, NJ 4 6 1981 Aug. 1982 1,551,470 1,617.470" 10,113.903 Rome Mohawk River, NY ,7 1959 Aug. 1982 7,000 7,000- Rutland, Otter Creed, VT 1963 1988 - 211,015 Sag Harbor, NY (Channel) ' 1964 Oct. 1992 - - Shooters Island, NJ & NY ' - July 1992 - - Shrewsbury River, NJ (1950 & 1965 Act) 1992 Jan. 1990 - - Swanton Harbor, VT6 1888 Aug. 1977 - 70.500 4 235 Ticonderoga River, NY .6 1895 Nov. 1983 167,760 16.500 1,260 Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 78 1951 Nov. 1981 9,253 9,253 Waterford, NY * ' 1939 Aug. 1982 - - Waycake Creek, NJ 1949 1988 - 2.781 Westchester Creek, NY 4 1981 Aug. 1982 175,933 175.933 2.921.311 2-38 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. SECTION 107 Project FY 99 Cost CONTINUE COORDINATING FEASIBILITY STUDY Coordination Account $5,438 TABLE 2-0 SECTION 103 Project FY 99 Cost PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Shelter Island, NY Rikers Island, East River, NY CONSTRUCTION FUNDING Oakwood Beach, Staten Island, NY Shelter Island, NY Rikes Island, East River, NY $331 175 $774,951 923,520 2,515 2-39 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT No Commerce reported. 10. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. Completed. ii. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. Uncomplete portion deauthorized. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended contributed 14. Deepening project to 13 feet. funds. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. Inactive. 16. 1912 authorization. Entire project deauthorized. 17. 1935 authorization. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 18. 1910 construction dikes. Removal for navigation. TABLE 2-N REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 SECTION 205 Project FEASIBILITY STUDY Lamoille River, VT Missisquoi, VT Poplar Brook, Monmouth City NJ Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, Herkimer City, NY Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, Herkimer City, NY Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, Herkimer City, NY Mad River Basin, VT New Haven River Basin,VT Otter Creek Basin, VT Black Falls Creek, VT Trout River, VT Boquet River, Elizabeth, NY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, NY Elizabeth River, Hillside, NJ Mill Brook, Highland Park, NJ Coordination Account SECTION 14 Project PLANNING AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Wallkill River, Rosendale, NY $22,164 Coordination Account 14,120 Elizabeth River, Valley View Rosendale, NJ 18,732 Richford Water Supply, VT 18,940 TABLE 2-R SECTION 206 Project FY 99 Cost COORDINATION ACCOUNT $10,867 PRELIMINARY RESTORATION PLANS $22,919 TABLE 2-S SECTION 1135 Project FY 99 Cost COORDINATION ACCOUNT INITIAL APPRAISALS, GENERAL $11,477 $27,543 2-40 TABLE 2-P FY 99 Cost 21,414 22,593 79,461 32,312 38,386 32,727 18,750 19,831 19,928 37,150 38,750 9,489 23,298 45,703 303,595 14,153 TABLE 2-Q FY 99 Cost I _ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southern Delaware, and a small Part of northeaster Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ..................... ................... 3-2 2. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE.....................3-2 3. Cedar Creek, DE...................... .................... 3-3 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ......................................3-3 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ.............................3-3 6. Delaware River Mainstem Channel & D eepening............................. ................... 3-4 7. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea..............................................3-5 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE................................3-5 9. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay DE, MD............................3-6 10. Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE.................................................3-7 11. Mispillon River......................... ................... 3-8 12. Murderkill River, DE.......................................3-8 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway.......................3-9 14. Salem River, NJ......................... .................. 3-10 15. Schuylkill River, PA ................................................ 3-10 16. Tuckerton Creek.................................. ..................... 3-11 17. Wilmington Harbor, DE..................................3-11 Beach Erosion Control Page 18. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ.............................................. 3-12 19. Delaware Coast Protection, DE.................................3-13 20. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ........................................... ...... 3-13 Flood Control Local Protection Page 21. Beltzville Lake, PA ................................................... 3-13 22. Blue Marsh Lake, PA................................................3-14 23. Emergency Bank Protection.....................................3-14 24. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization.................................... ...................... 3-14 25. Francis E. Walter Dam,PA..............................3-15 26. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ........................ .................... 3-15 27. Glen Foerd, PA ...................... .................... 3-16 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects....................... ................... 3-16 29. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees............................3-16 30. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ.............................................3-16 31. National Emergency Preparedness.....................3-17 32. Navigation Work Under Special A uthorization ........................................................... 3-17 33. Prom pton Lake, PA .................................................. 3-17 34. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys.................3-17 35. Schuylkill River Park, Philadelphia, PA..............3-18 36. South Central, Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement, PA......................3-18 37. Southeastern Pennsylvania, PA........................3-19 General Investigations Page 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data.........................3-20 39. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design................3-20 40. Surveys................. ....... ........................ 3-20 Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement.....................3-21 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation...............................3-27 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.......................................3-35 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects.............................3-37 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.........................................3-37 TABLE 3-F Deauthorized Projects.........................3-38 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is the main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast, which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications were constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the old groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction was placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and is being stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations are placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light that furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: Maintenance: Condition surveys were accomplished. Dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge Currituck removed a total of 217,000 cubic yards of material at a total of $722,750. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE Location: The new St. Georges Bridge carries the new Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in New Castle County, Delaware and is located approximately 2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. Previous project: None. Existing project: This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, Delaware, approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of $115,000,000. The bridge was officially opened to traffic in December 1995. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost incurred. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included supervision and administration and reimbursement to the State of Delaware for construction costs of St. Georges Bridge Replacement and work on draft EIS for closure/removal of the St. Georges bridge. 3. CEDAR CREEK, NJ Location: In the northeastern corner of Sussex County, DE, approximately five miles east of the Town of Milford. The area is accessible via State Route 36. Existing project: Cedar creek, with headwaters in Sussex County, meanders northward through coastal salt marsh to its terminus at Mispillion River. The creek currently ranges in depth from 13 feet below mean low water at the Route 36 bridge to less than 5 feet at several locations. The channel width varies from approximately 75 feet to 50 feet. Tidal range in the lower reaches of the creek is approximately 4 feet. Existing project was adopted by the Chief of Engineers, 10 December 1979 under the small navigation program, section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: Five marinas are located along the lower stretch of the creek, with residential areas being situated near the Delaware Bay shore. The area is sparsely populated, and there are no major metropolitan areas nearby. Operation during fiscal year: Maintenance: A continuing contract to perform maintenance dredging of selected shoals within the Federal waterway was awarded to Cottrell Construction Corporation on 16 September 1998. Actual dredging operations commenced on 16 November 1998 and were completed 27 November 1998. A total of 20,551 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $250,000. 4. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor that is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Fry removed a total of 79,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $137,550. 5. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to. upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning 3-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal that is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included channel examination surveys. 6. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM CHANNEL & DEEPENING, NJ, PA, & DE Location: The project area is located within the Delaware Estuary and borders Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. It extends over 100 miles of the Delaware River from Philadelphia Harbor, Pa. and Beckett Street Terminal in Camden, NJ to the mouth of the Delaware Bay. Existing project: Delaware River Federal Navigation Channel (Philadelphia to the Sea Project) completed in 1942. The project calls for modifying the existing Delaware River Federal Navigation (Philadelphia to the Sea Project) channel from 40 to 45 feet below Mean Low Water (MLW) with an allowable dredging over depth following the existing channel alignment from Delaware Bay to Philadelphia Harbor and the Beckett Street Terminal, Camden New Jersey, a distance of about 102.5 miles. The channel width (same as the existing 40-foot project) would range from 400 feet in Philadelphia Harbor to 800 feet from Philadelphia Naval Business Center to Bombay Hook and then 1,000 feet in Delaware Bay. The plan includes appropriate bend widening as well as provision of a two-space anchorage for safety purposes to a depth of 45 feet at Marcus Hook. The estimated project construction cost is $311,000,000. Dredged material would be placed in confined upland disposal areas and for beneficial uses in Delaware Bay. The improved channel will have a significant impact in allowing more efficient vessel loading, reducing the lightering requirements of crude oil tankers in the lower Delaware Bay, and attracting larger, more efficient container and dry bulk vessels. It is estimated that the proposed deepening will result in annual transportation savings of $40.1 million. Project estimate cost (October 1998) is Federal, $215,100,000, which includes $1,100,000 of Coast Guard contributions. Non-Federal costs are $122,500,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local Cooperation: Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is scheduled for execution in FY 2000. Currently, headquarters is reviewing the draft PCA. 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Operations During Fiscal Year: New Work: Executed PCA and engineering and design. 7. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean lower low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details.) Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Routine maintenance of Government owned disposal areas and channel examination surveys. Work included dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge McFarland removing 1,300,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,900,000. Maintenance dredging also was accomplished by Weeks Marine removing 2,580,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,180,650. Accomplished cleanup of Penns Grove disposal area. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) 3-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included concrete bag placement to repair the North Jetty. 9. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE, & MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide was completed in the third quarter of FY 1975 with the exception of the anchorage at Elk River. Removing the 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 are federal cost $166,000,000 (October 1992). This portion is deauthorized. Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in fiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000 (90 price level). Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included general maintenance of traffic control television, dispatch service, operation of traffic, administration building, bridges, roadways, grounds, museum, auxiliary works, and periodic bridge inspection. Also included in work was maintenance night lighting, lease of equipment, surveys, environmental monitoring, electrical maintenance, property management, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. There was also work on the Disposal Material Management Plan, Geographical Information System, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, mosquito control, monitoring data, monitoring stabilization banks, and miscellaneous repairs. There was also maintenance dredging by Weeks Marine Incorporated from December 23, 1998 to March 31, 1999 removing a total of 759,534 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $2,665,964. 10. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. 3-7 _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included a boundary monumentation survey from Roosevelt Inlet to the Savannah Ave. Bridge for the purpose of identifying all land the government holds an interest in, be it by fee or easement right. Also, a continuing contract to remove shoals from within the projects entrance channel (Roosevelt Inlet) was awarded to Cottrell Construction Corporation on 16 September 1998. Actual dredging operations commenced on 27 October 1998 and was completed on 9 November 1998. A total of 29,577 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $172,000. 11. MISPILLION RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See Coast and geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous project: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water, in October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Report 1957, (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act has not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Condition survey of stone revetment. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging within the Federal waterway was awarded to Cottrell Construction Corporation on 16 September 1998. Actual dredging operations commenced on 28 November 1998 and were completed 5 December 1998. A total of 14,277 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $165,000. 12. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62d Congress 3rd Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: A continuing contract to remove selected shoals within the Murderkill River Entrance channel was awarded to Cottrell Construction Corporation on 16 September 1998. Actual dredging operations commenced on 7 December 1998 and was completed on 16 December 1998. A total 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT of 30,233 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $198,000. 13. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included general maintenance, surveys, and inspection of Point Pleasant Canal bulkhead. Maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company removed 259,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,243,000. Real Estate inspections were also conducted. 3-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 14. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. This project was further modified as HD 68-110 in 1925, providing an entrance channel from the Delaware River to the fixed highway bridge in Salem with dimensions and limits as shown, including a cut-off and by the WRDA of 1986. The letter provided for channel widening and deepening; a turning basin; and wetland restoration. For further details see the Report of the Secretary of the Army dated 20 October 1994. Existing project: Provides a channel depth to 16 feet below mean low water between the Route 49 highway bridge and the Delaware River, a distance of about 5 miles. The channel is 150-250 feet wide and a trapezoidal shaped turning basin has a width of 495 feet and average length of 1000 feet. The project also contains 15.6 acres of wetland restoration to replace the loss of wetlands and shallow water habitat. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The dredging for the existing project is completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In Mach 1996, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 16 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H. DOC. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.) The latest published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 31, 1995 and requires that the Non-Federal sponsor provides cash in the amount of $779,000 and "other" (disposal area and associated costs) costs of $1,556,000 provide real estate and perform associated dredging. These requirements have been satisfied. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included engineering and design, supervision and administration, wetland restoration and condition surveys. Maintenance: Starting of plans and specifications and chemical testing of the soil for maintenance dredging. 15. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. 3-10 I _ _ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $7,440,000. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included channel examination surveys. 16. TUCKERTON CREEK, NJ Location: This creek rises in Ocean County, NJ flows southerly 7 miles, and empties into Little Egg Harbor about 8 miles north of Little Egg Inlet. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 825 and 1216.) Previous project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide from the head of Marchelder Channel in Little Tuckerton Bay to the mouth; thence 75 feet wide to Parkers Landing, 1 mile above the mouth; thence 60 feet wide to West Tuckerton Landing, 1.75 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 5 feet deep and 60 feet wide to just above Scow Landing, 2 miles above the mouth; and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 40 feet wide to the Mill Dam at Tuckerton 2.25 miles above the mouth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 3.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. Then mean tidal range is 2.5 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. Existing project: Completed in 1925. Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of wharves and piers of pile-and timber-construction along the creek. There are also four boatyards with marine railways, and repair and storage facilities located at Tuckerton. One wharf at Tuckerton is publicly owned. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included contract administration. 17. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962). Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Routine maintenance of disposal areas, channel examination surveys, project shoaling study, and contract administration. Also, a contract for maintenance dredging of both the 35-foot and 38-foot project channels was completed by Weeks Marine Dredging Company on 10 June 1999. As a result of this work, 581,292 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $743,526. Beach Erosion Control: 18. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the western side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94-641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Work for the initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate cost (October 1998) is Federal, $146,800,000, which includes $49,400,000 of Coast Guard contributions. Non-Federal costs are $9,700,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on May 31, 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: Work included plans and specifications of beachfill, supervision and administration, hydraulic studies, engineering and design, survey of the beach and sediment sampling, and periodic nourishment. 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 19. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2021. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong. 2nd Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1998) is $25,700,000 of which $11,800,000 are federal costs and $13,900,000 are required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unscheduled portion of the project. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included supervision and administration, engineering and design, monitoring, and sand bypassing. 20. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The project consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill extends from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan required the initial placement of 6,200,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,100,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment is being taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Additionally, the construction of the project required the extension of 38 storm drainpipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for new work (October 1998) Federal share is $359,000,000 and non-Federal is $193,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local Cooperation Agreement that identifies the required items of cooperation. In a letter dated 28 September 1990, the State of New Jersey identified a funding source for their costs and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with the final negotiations to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611, 42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).The Local Cooperation agreement was executed in September 1991. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included engineering and design, hydraulic studies, supervision and administration, surveys of the beach, aerial photography, and monitoring. Flood Control: 21. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood 3-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 22. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Costs of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 23. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1999 Plans and Specifications Fort Mifflin, Phila., PA Ocean Gate, Ocean County, NJ Sawkill Creek Bridge Dingman Township Section 14 Coordination Stoney Creek East Norriton, PA $10,578 $ 8,811 $42,747 $14,460 $ 5,011 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1999 Plans and Specifications Little Mill Creek, New Castle City, DE $ 86,899 Feasibility Reports Bock & Brock Creeks, Yardley, PA Mill Creek, Upper Moreland, PA $ 7,500 $ 94,174 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Port Indian, W. Norriton Township Repaupo Creek, NJ Section 205 Coordination Upper Mill Creek, Middletown, PA Construction Palmerton, PA Emergency flood control activities-rel fighting, and rescue work (Public Law Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $331,663 fc preparedness. 25. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAS Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pe on Lehigh River between White H Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile belowv Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluenc River and Delaware River at Easton, PA (See Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA Existing project: Plan of improvement by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 79t1 Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flo reservoir. Modification of project, authoriz Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522, 87th Cong. provides for a multiple-purpose developmen supply and recreation in addition t single-purpose flood control project. improvement requires altering spillway, increa of dam, constructing a new intake tower, exte tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and c new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modifi rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensi flood control and other purposes of Delay Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,0( spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply anc and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. T $186,000,000, estimated Federal cost of (October 1993) is $30,000,000 including $1 required non-Federal reimbursement for cost to water supply storage during life of project this storage is initiated. Project as authorize 1946 Flood Control Act was completed Ji Settlement for lands was completed October advance engineering and design for the modi: is completed. (See Table 3-B at end of Chap $ 19,914 $ 64,058 $ 14,182 $ 6,102 authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local $521,125 interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its pair, flood support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and 99, 84th reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. r disaster Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project. i, PA 26. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA nnsylvania aven and Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of v mouth of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and e of Lehigh village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above Geological confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in ). Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological authorized Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA.) h Cong., 2d od control Existing project: A single-purpose flood control ed by 1962 reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by 2d Sess.), an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and t for water rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with o present intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling Plan of basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a ising height drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of iding outlet watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of onstructing Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. ed dam will Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood feet long. Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project ive plan for completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of ware River Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 0)0 acre-feet 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project of inactive to Sept. 30, 1999.) d recreation otal cost is Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with new work requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 56,000,000 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. ts allocated after use of Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: d under the Normal operation and maintenance of the project. ne 1961. 1962. The fied project ter for Acts 3-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 GLEN FOERD, PA Lehigh River, Bethlehem, PA Pocono Creek, Stroudsburg, PA October 1998 May 1999 Location: The Glen Foerd estate is a National Register Historic Property located on the Delaware River at the confluence with the Poquessing Creek in the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Previous project: None. Existing project: Since the construction of the historic property in the 1850's, the forces of the Delaware River and Poquessing Creek have caused a significant deterioration of the 1,350-foot river wall on the perimeter of the property, including undermining of the foundation, settlement, loose and dislodged stones and loss of capstones. Significant sections of the wall have already collapsed. Without rehabilitation and restoration, erosive forces will continue to undermine the structural integrity of the river wall, leading to further weakening and collapse of additional sections of the wall, exposing the embankment and endangering other portions of this historic property. Construction of the project was authorized by Section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640). The project will restore the river wall consistent with the historic nature of the property. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Local interests were required to provide items of local cooperation consistent with the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The local sponsor is the City of Philadelphia, Fairmount Park Commission. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in May 1998. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Construction completed. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION Delaware River, Port Jervis Equinunk River, Equinunk, PA Lehigh River, Allentown, PA DATES June 1999 September 1999 May 1999 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $11,296. 29. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: PROJECT INSPECTION East Stroudsburg, PA Hawley, PA Stroudsburg, PA DATES April 1999 July 1999 April 1999 30. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ Location: Approximately 12 miles northwest of New York City, located in Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, New Jersey along Molly Ann's Brook from the mouth below Totowa Avenue in Paterson upstream to Church Street in Haledon. Previous project: None. Existing project: The recommended plan modified the channel a total length of 2.5 miles. The channel includes both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges were replaced and one building was removed. Estimated cost of project (October 1998) is $ 38,800,000 of which $20,600,000 are Federal costs and $18,200,000 are required non-Federal costs. Costs are in accordance with Section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662), dated November 17, 1986. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing Project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1993. The State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, the non-federal sponsor, provided a portion of their support through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Terminal facilities: None. 3-16 27. PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. It also included surveys, utilities, and channel improvement from the Passaic River to Church Street. 31. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $84,597. 32. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1999 Plans and Specifications Wills Hole Thoro, Pt. Pleasant, NJ $132,093 Feasibility Section 107 Coordination Account Wilmington Harbor, DE $ 5,703 $14,256 33. PROMPTON LAKE, PA Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. DOC 522, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1994) is $3,510,000 including $54,990,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966, suspended in 1968 and again suspended in and resumed in 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance at the project continued. Continued design memo on spillway efficiency. 34. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance Surveys Cohansey River, NJ Maurice River, NJ Survey Conducted May 1999 May 1999 3-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Condition Surveys Broadkill River, DE Broadkill River, DE Cedar Creek, DE Cedar Creek, DE Cedar Creek, DE Lewis & Rehoboth Canal, DE Lewis & Rehoboth Canal, DE Mispillion River, DE Mispillion River, DE Murderkill River, DE Murderkill River, DE Oyster Creek, NJ Salem River, NJ Salem River, NJ Schuylkill River (above Fairmount Dam), PA Survey Conducted November 1998 April 1999 November 1998 December 1998 April 1999 November 1998 April 1999 December 1998 May 1999 December 1998 April 1999 February 1999 April 1999 September 1999 July 1999 35. SCHUYLKILL RIVER PARK, -PHILADELPHIA, PA Location: The Schuylkill River Park is located about six nautical miles from the confluence of the Delaware and Schuylkill River in Center City Philadelphia. Philadelphia represents the urban gateway of 1,900 square mile Schuylkill Watershed. Existing Project: This proposed project is the final phase of a three-phase master plan, which the City of Philadelphia and other local interest have implemented. This phase focuses on the restoration of a greenway to include a 3,800-foot long promenade and amenities enabling and experience with values of the river corridor and provide opportunities for active and passive recreation. The greenway will eliminate urban blight and increase the viability of the surrounding residential, institutional and commercial communities. The project is in accordance with the President's Council on Sustainable Development and White House Task Force on Livable Communities. Other Federal programs intersect with this type of urban environmental restoration, including American Heritage Rivers. The project is in keeping with the Investing in America Initiatives proposed in WRDA 2000. It does so as part of a multi-agency effort (Federal, state, and local agencies and non-Federal resources with new private sector and/or philanthropic investments to address local priorities. Corps of Engineers assistance on the project is authorized by Section 564 (c ) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303) and Section 348 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, which amended the authorization amount to $4,000,000. The total cost of the entire project is estimated at $6,100,000 of which $4,000,000 is a Federal cost pursuant to the Section 348 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-53) authorization. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local Cooperation: Under cost-share provisions for environmental restoration, non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs to include lands, easements and rights of way and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the project after construction. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: Hired labor. 36. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT, PA Location: The south central Pennsylvania area includes twenty-one counties defined by the authorizing legislation. The program area within the Philadelphia District consists of Pike, Monroe, and Lackawanna Counties. Existing project: Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended, established a pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements to the sponsor. FY 98 was the first year of funding for three project names in the Energy and Water Appropriations documents. Total project funds earmarked were $7,650,000 for work within Philadelphia District. The House Report (105-190) provides $10,000,000 in design and construction assistance under the Section 313 Program for projects in Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike and Monroe Counties in Pennsylvania. The Conference Report (105- 271) specifies the funds among eight specific projects. 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Appropriations for those projects in the Philadelphia District are: Westfall Municipal Sewage Authority, Pike County; Jefferson Township, Lackawanna County; Township of Tobyhanna Sewer Authority, Monroe County. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) Local cooperation: The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Municipal Authority of the Westfall Township, PA developed a project scope and design (partial cost reimbursement) agreement was executed. Jefferson Township, Lackawanna County, PA developed a project scope and design (partial cost reimbursement) agreement was executed. Tobyhanna Township, Monroe County, PA is in construction. Municipal Authority of the Milford Authority, PA developed a project scope and design (partial cost reimbursement) agreement was executed. 37. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, PA Location: Section 566 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 authorized a pilot program to provide for environmental assistance (design and construction) to non-Federal interests for publicly owned facilities in the five (5) county area surrounding the city of Philadelphia. Previous project: None. Existing project: The intent is to review contaminated sites which are potential sources of contamination to the water resources regime of an area and, as part of a cooperative arrangement with a local sponsor, remediate that site and remove the threat of contamination to the water resources of the area. In response to the growing number of abandoned, idled and under utilized commercial and industrial properties across the country, the USEPA launched the "Brownfields" initiative to investigate to spur the revitalization of these properties and return them to productive use. This initiative was authorized under Section 104 (d)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. As an outgrowth of this initiative, other Federal, State, and local agencies as well as Congress have also initiated programs and legislation in this regard. One of those implemented legislative measures was Section 566 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996. The first pilot project was the East Central Incinerator in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1999.) The East Central Incinerator property is located on Municipal North Piers 31 through 35 at 601 North Columbus Boulevard (at the intersection of North Columbus Boulevard and Spring Garden Street), in Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. The Delaware River bounds the property on the north and east. The property is bounded to the south by the Delaware River and a parking lot. North Columbus Boulevard bounds the property on the west. The East Central Incinerator property consists of approximately seven (7) acres of land which currently accommodates the Incinerator Building, a Service Building (built on piles in 1968 at the north side of the former Municipal pier 34), an electric switch building, a scale house, two (2) small parking attendant buildings and a parking lot. Wissinoming and Logan (Feltonville) sections of Philadelphia are located in north/northeast Philadelphia. These areas are experiencing severe subsidence of residential properties that were built many years ago on fill material placed over old watercourses. Breaks in the pipes provide an avenue for the fill material to be transported by ground water away from building foundations. In an effort to determine the cause and extent of the subsidence, a topographic map will be prepared and compared to historic maps to show how much fill was placed in the old watercourses. Borings will be taken in the fill to confirm topographic data and to determine the engineering characteristics of the fill material. Water and sewer lines will also be mapped to determine if such lines are present in areas where subsidence has occurred and to predict where subsidence may occur due to leaking water lines and deteriorating sewer lines. Local cooperation: The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of the project costs to include lands, easements and rights of way and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the project after construction. The non-Federal sponsors receive credit for any design work completed prior to the federal involvement. 3-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: East Central Incinerator - Coordination of design PCA and engineering and design. Wissinoming - Surveys. General Investigations: 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $227,010. 39. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period totaled $2,329,150. 40. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $310 for navigation studies, $0 for flood control studies, $1,178,435 for shoreline protection studies, $1,659,556 for special studies: a total of $2,838,301. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 SEPT. 30, 1999 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, St. George's Bridge Replacement 3. Cedar Creek, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Delaware River Mainstem Channel & Deepening New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 21,789 31,083,849 2,100 - 30,994,363 1,212,000 1,341,000 1,228,500 1,129,000 22,057,433 1,211,583 1,288,725 1,275,068 1,110,503 22,019,024 2,789 13,917,000 -3,575 13,793,140 14,000,000 14,000,000 15,500,000 12,500,000 119,000,000 14,001,341 13,998,657 15,498,402 12,504,761 119,000,178 115,000 135,205 - 92,364 157,711 511,000 359,000 368,000 156,305 520,156 351,394 373,298 158,750 3,378,000 1,059,000 3,834,000 3,363,169 1,071,328 3,794,627 388,000 423,647 550,000 550,000 1,500,000 - 302,405 256,100 256,100 563,405 560,813 35,100 35,100 879,275 879,275 7,297,956 7,295,054 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,00010 150,00010 72,147,8003 72,147,8003 53,668,0374 53,652,8524 565,000 565,000 1,500,000 302,405 3-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 SEPT. 30, 1999 7. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds) 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD (Regular Funds) 10. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Mispillion River (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20,680,240 13,734,500 12,856,000 17,092,302 20,586,484 13,772,311 12,778,810 17,221,925 57,879,8725 57,879,8725 510,939,61019 510,535,43619 508,324 508,324 511,210'18 511,21018 476,000 477,724 17,965 18,887 50,000 219,000 5,023,939 37,048 218,861 5,010,846 - - - 1,323,775 - - - 1,323,775 - - - 210,000 - - - 210,000 - - - 132,535,5918 - - - 132,532,5988 17,757,000 13,123,260 14,768,000 11,748,000 318,782,2259 17,690,726 13,006,114 14,641,638 12,043,064 318,557,2269 - - - 17,356,718 - - - 17,357,915 561,514 561,514 146,000 154,231 42,000 197,000 170,873 5,172,101 35,273 191,575 183,428 5,178,462 S1 65,000 113,557 - 156,317 121,384 60,000 60,000 738,83923 738,83923 4,477,56424 4,482,88424 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 SEPT. 30, 1999 12. Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Salem River, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Schuylkill River, PA (RegularFunds) 16. Tuckerton Creek (Regular Funds) 17. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 37,630 37,630 40,000 219,918 25,000 134,026 39,187 217,359 26,102 136,354 2,731,358 2,733,761 -- - - 71,549" - - - - 71,549" 2,545,000 2,634,851 2,415,000 1,523,000 52,067,16712 2,507,436 2,655,033 2,369,179 1,581,219 52,047,85012 - - - - 1,196,581 - - - - 1,196,581 -- - - 99,000 -- - - 99,000 671,230 594,000 2,236,604 650,586 2,408 517,772 -2,487 -1,399 1,735 3,338 - 50,000 - 46,532 76,145 36,787 6,732,8642 6,701,7642 2,920,6866 2,917,2186 1,450,825 802,038 - - - - 3,334,00713 - - - - 3,334,00713 1,923,000 258,744 1,470,000 582,000 35,954,293 1,916,708 263,578 1,457,158 566,780 35,913,925 - - - - 60,242 - - - - 60,242 -7,000 5,829 - 650,000 - 614,966 32,630 1,310,917 1,307,669 - - - 1,954,72514,7 - - - 1,954,72514,7 2,060,000 4,370,000 3,728,000 3,257,000 94,026,725 2,056,636 4,378,512 3,654,402 3,347,868 94,000,280 3-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 SEPT. 30, 1999 (Contributed Funds) 18. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 22. Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 25. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. -100,000 160,00017 60,000" - 1,765,000 263,000 930,000 17,242,176 -52,461 2,027,041 146,607 1,047,917 16,840,638 250,000 158,179 162,000 20,693 -2,824,758 16,918 2,972,924 214,000 210,000 217,000 5,306,95322 235,073 248,133 222,314 4,885,91322 - - - 215,350 - - - 215,350 - - - 1,268,67120 - - - 1,259,00220 - 2,380,000 1,658,000 139,000 31,171,000 145,239 2,591,461 1,672,833 139,146 31,160,984 3,281 80,478 904,000 525,000 80,709 1,752,978 -17,057,281 37,020 17,431,760 - - - 22,931,831 - - - 22,931,831 935,000 1,120,000 747,000 866,000 14,665,589 918,872 1,092,620 725,359 921,574 14,619,812 - - - 63,180,300 - - - 63,180,299 Approp. 2,517,000 2,349,000 1,986,000 2,172,509 Cost 2,494,211 2,246,589 2,028,329 2,273,844 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 38,872 45,698 30,465,803 30,389,985 - - 12,449,68215 - - 12,437,323's 1,081,000 1,248,000 663,000 564,000 15,011,949 1,047,367 1,237,457 613,735 650,390 14,998,027 3-24 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 SEPT. 30, 1999 26. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (Regular Funds) 27. Glen Foerd, PA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 30. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 33. Prompton Lake (Regular Funds) 35. Schuylkill River Park, Phila., PA (Regular Funds) 36. South Central, PA Environmental Restoration (Regular Funds) 37. Southeastern Pennsylvania (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 287,000 286,156 200,000 15,381 205,000 211,000 170,000 189,697 204,667 193,290 800,000 9,130 14,284 960,065 350,000 343,893 4,073,105 4,073,105 4,195,364 4,162,740 1,000,000 998,860 350,000 343,893 -123,000 4,580,000 7,090,000 4,765,000 21,213,000 1,780,216 8,110,218 8,177,256 4,788,378 21,075,852 741,000 4,164,795 1,700,000 1,800,000 5,700,00021 78,757 1,980,000 1,192,715 1,710,058 4,508,57421 - - - 4,609,48316 - - - 4,609,48316 606,000 618,520 588,000 541,000 691,000 10,346,641 573,281 509,760 745,515 10,337,984 75,000 - 54,694 4,650,000 - 132,107 955,107 939,000 (-595,000) - 36,373 13,271 75,000 54,694 4,650,000 1,087,214 344,000 49,644 * Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 2. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment new work toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance cost incurred for preperation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous projects. 3-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 SEPT. 30, 1999 7. Excludes $412,400 spent for Continuing Authority project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds & $100,00 Contributed Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 services furnished during preconstruction planning. 21. Includes $112,000 for work done for the State of New Jersey. 22. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 23. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 24. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previouse projects. 3-26 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 2, 1985 Oct. 27, 1990 Dec. 10, 1979 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE (See Section 2 of Text) The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be reimbursed if it carries out the work CEDAR CREEK, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) Creek ranges in depth from 13 feet at the Route 36 bridges to less than 5 feet at sseveral locations. Channel width varies from 75 feet to 250 feet. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.85, 74th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA 1990 River and Harbor Act of 1960 H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. 3-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26,1937 Jul. 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 October 1992 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Jun. 20, 19383 Mar. 2, 19454 Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM CHANNEL & DEEPENING (See Section 6 of Text) The 45-foot deep project was authorized for construction. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2nd sess.' WRDA 1992 P.L. 902-580 Section 101 (6) Doc. 733, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong., 2nd sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3rd sess.' H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong. 1st sess.' 3-28 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 19454 Mar. 2, 19454 Sept. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 30, 1935 A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 8 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 9 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess.' Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 201, 72nd Cong., 1 st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2nd sess.' Public Law 310, 76th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 123, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 275, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.'. 3-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1912 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 Jul. 13, 1982 Jul. 1, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 10 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. 5 MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 11 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extention of south. Extention of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to The landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, Including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 678, 6 2 nd Cong., 2 nd sess.' Rivers and Harbor Comm., Doc. 83 S. Doc. 229, 81St Cong., 2 nd sess.1 H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. (See page 981 in Annual Report of 1892.) H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 525 79th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 3-30 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 24, 1946 SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 14 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Extention of project to Clements Bridge. A channel of 20-foot depth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 15 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel belowPassyunk Ave., channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and' by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. H. Doc. 217, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 15, 73rd Cong., 1st sess.' WRDA of 1986' H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2nd sess' H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2nd sess' Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 3,1896 Jul. 25,1912 TUCKERTON CREEK, NJ (See Section 16 of Text) For depths of 6, 5, and 3 feet. Substitution of channel as across Little Tuckerton Bay. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 17 of Text) Depths of 21, 10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. H. Doc. 274, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1040, 64 th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 66, 54 th Cong., 1St sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 3-31 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 3-B Acts Sept. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935' Oct. 17, 1940 Jul. 14, 1960 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 18 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; main tenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Documents H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Project may be constructed separately or in combin- WRDA of 1986 ation with any other feature of the project. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. H. Doc. 90, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Nov. 17, 1986 Project is modified to authorized the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE.8 WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 3-32 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 20 of Text) Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965. WRDA of 1986. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 25 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 26 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. GLEN FOERD, PA (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for restoration of the 1,350-foot river wall on the perimeter of the historic property for shoreline protection. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ (See Section 30 of Text) Modify Channel with a total length of 2.5 miles miles. Channel will include both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will removed. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Section 106, WRDA of 1990 WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. 3-33 Nov. 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. SCHUYLKILL RIVER PARK, PHILADELPHIA, PA (See Section 35 of Text) Authorized appropriated amount is increased. Authorized $4 million to provide technical, planning, design, and construction assistance. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT, PA (See Section 36 of Text) Pilot program providing environmental assistance to non-Federal Interests in South Central Pennsylvania. Provides $10 million in design and construction assistance under the Section 313 progam. Specifies the funds among eight specific projects. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, PA (See Section 37 of Text) Pilot program providing for environmental assistance (design and construction) to non-Federal interests for publicly owned facilities in the five (5) county area surrounding the City of Philadelphia. "Brownfields" initiative to investigate to spur the revitalization of these properties and return them to productive use. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA 1996 Section 564 (c) Section 313, WRDA of 1992 H. Report 105-190 Conference Report 105-271 Section 566, WRDA of 1996 Section 104 (d)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935. 3. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. Extension of jetties considered to be active. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 3-34 Documents PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1999 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ COMPLETED Absecon Inlet, NJ COMPLETED Alloway Creek, NJ' COMPLETED Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE Big Timber Creek, NJ COMPLETED Broadkill River, DE COMPLETED Cohansey River, NJ COMPLETED Cooper River, NJ' COMPLETED Delaware Bay to Millville COMPLETED Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project SEE TABLE 3-F Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ COMPLETED Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ ACTIVE Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE Double Creek, NJ1 COMPLETED Harbor of Refuge COMPLETED Goshen Creek, NJ1 INACTIVE Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA"5 INACTIVE Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE '5 INACTIVE Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay COMPLETED Leipsic River, DE' INACTIVE Little Egg Harbor, NJ"3 INACTIVE Little River, DE COMPLETED Manasquan River, NJ ACTIVE Mantua Creek, NJ COMPLETED Maurice River, NJ ACTIVE **Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA COMPLETED Oldmans Creek, NJ COMPLETED **Pepper Creek, DE COMPLETED Raccoon Creek, NJ COMPLETED Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA1 COMPLETED 1989 1990 1989 1975 1989 1976 1995 1989 1997 1897 1912 1964 1905 1928 1898 1981 1931 6 1980 1998 1966 1997 1968 1941 1989 1994 1955 11,935 534,20916 21,398 87,594 58,6652 68,228 146,75620 33,102 143,98421 256,624 5,045,17322 4,701 7,800 5,162,23018 15,359 208,964 224,704 168,41211 36,956 15,048 12,016 8,008,27823,24 169,6877 110,000 128,20314 31,188 138,094's 83,66513 4,291,810 84,186' 5,985173"17 55,117 71,925' 243,641 3,749,983 396,528* 161,913 3,261,386 4 1,169,01419 870 14,336 98,36012 32,345 288,310 5,315,59925 339,340* 1,577,194 54,601 32,125 38,988* 368,001 4 3-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1999 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Smyrna River, DE 1949 - - Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing9 COMPLETED - 198,844 197,327 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. SEE TABLE 3-F - - Toms River, NJ ACTIVE 1996 10,050 262,485 Waterway from Indian River ACTIVE 1997 - 340,104 Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE Woodbury Creek, NJ1 COMPLETED 1940 27,09310 56,474 For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1999 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon' 8 - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth DEFERRED - -- 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st Sess. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 9. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 10. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 12. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 13. Encludes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 14. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 15. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 16. Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 18. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 19. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. 20. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. 22. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 23. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 24. Includes $555,809 for previous projects. 25. Inlcudes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-36 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1999 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island INACTIVE* - - - Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - - * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1999 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 1 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 1 Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 1 Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1990 628,4672 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. Transferred from Baltimore District in FY 1989. 3-37 REPORT OF THE SECRECTARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE' 1934 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $78,243 - Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 $7,139 - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 - - Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project 2 Oldmans Creek, NJ3 Rancocas River, NJ4 Smyrna River, DE5 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Beach Erosion Projects Atlantic City, NJ Barnegat Light, NJ Cape May City, NJ Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ Hereford Inlet Long Beach Island, NJ Ocean City, NJ 1941 1942 1949 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1972 1964 1961 1978 1964 1969 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 HD 95-157 Date 1 And Authority HD 538 918 HD 208 918 3 Sep 54 HD 206 918 14 Jul 60 HD 208 918 HD 184 918 $63,313 $57,590 $396,169 Federal Funds Expended $2,083,289 $70,908 Contributed Funds Expended $22,9577 $314,400 $40,665 $395,8319 3-38 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Beach Erosion Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Rehoboth Beach to Indian River 1965 HD 216 Inlet, DE 918 $326,116 - For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Flood Control Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Chester River, 17 Nov 86 Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 Delaware River, Mouth of 1917 5 Aug 77 Neversink HD 94-192 - - Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA6 2 Nov 79 1966 Section 12 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 - Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Tocks Island, PA, NJ, and NY8 1979 23 Oct 62 PL 87-874 65,106,26010 - Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. 1979 23 Oct 62 Route 209 only) PA8 PL 87-874 $195,223 - Trexler Lake, PA 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 - - 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 7. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works funds expended for extention to two groins. 8. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 9. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal participation expended under Public Works Acceleration Program for extention of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. 10. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. 3-39 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, M D and VA ............................................. 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift .............. 4-4 3. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD ..................... 4-4 4. Knapps Narrows, MD ................................ 4-4 5. Little Wicomico River, VA ............................. 4-5 6. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD ............... 4-5 7. Nanticoke River, DE & MD........................... 4-5 8. Northeast River, MD .................................. 4-6 9. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ................................... 4-6 10. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ................ 4-6 11. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA ................. 4-7 12. Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA................. 4-7 13. Potomac River Below Washington, DC......... 4-7 14. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurous Deposits, M D .......................................... 4-7 15. Shallow Creek, Baltimore, MD....................... 4-8 16. Tolchester Channel, S- Turn, MD ................. 4-8 17. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD ........... 4-8 18. Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, MD ............. 4-8 19. Washington Harbor, DC ................................ 4-9 20. Wicomico River, MD ..................................... 4-9 21. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 4-10 22. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ......................................... 4-10 Beach Erosion Control 23. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 4-10 24. Atlantic Coast of Maryland ........................ 4-10 Flood Control 25. Broad Top Region, PA ................................ 4-10 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 26. Cumberland MD, and Ridgeley, WV ........... 4-10 27. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV ...... 4-11 28. Lackawanna River Basin, PA ...................... 4-11 28A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA......................... 4-12 29. Lock Haven, PA ......................................... 4-12 30. Moorefield, WV .................................. ..... 4-12 31. Lackawanna River, Olyphant, PA ................ 4-12 32. Dickson City, (Olyphant), PA ...................... 4-13 33. Petersburg, W V ........................................... 4-13 34. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA ...................................... 4-13 35. Lackawanna River, Scranton, PA................. 4-13 36. South Central PA Environmental Improvement Program.................................. 4-14 37. WV and PA Flood Control.......................... 4-14 38. Southern New York Flood Control Projects ........................................ 4-15 38A. Addison, NY .............................................. 4-15 38B. Almond Lake, NY ........................................ 4-15 38C. Arkport Dam, NY ....................................... 4-15 38D. Avoca, NY ................................................ 4-15 38E. Binghamton, NY ....................................... 4-16 38F. Canisteo, NY ......................................... 4-16 38G Corning, NY ............................................. 4-16 38H1. East Sidney, NY ......................................... 4-17 381 Elm ira, NY ................................................ 4-17 38J. Hornell, NY .......................... .................... 4-17 38K Lisle, N Y ................................................... 4-18 38L Oxford, NY ........................... .................... 4-18 38M Whitney Point Lake, NY ............................. 4-18 38N. Whitney Point Village, NY .......................... 4-18 39. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA ........ 4-19 40. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA ................................ 4-19 40Ak Cowanesque Lake, PA ................................ 4-19 40B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ......................... 4-20 4-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 41. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA .... 4-20 41A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA .............................. 4-20 41B. Curwensville Lake, PA ............................... 4-20 41C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA................... 4-21 42. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) .......... 4-21 43. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA......................... 4-21 44. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................................ 4-22 45. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir O perations .............................................. 4-22 46. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ......................................... 4-22 Environmental Restoration 47. Anacostia River & Tributaries, MD & DC. 4-22 48. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD ...... 4-22 49. Chester River, Bodkin Island, MD ............. 4-23 50. Little Falls Dam Fish Passage #2, MD ....... 4-23 51. Poplar Island, M D ....................................... 4-23 Regulatory Program 52. Regulatory Program ..................................... 4-24 Water Supply Page 53. Washington Aqueduct ................................ 4-24 54. 55. 56. 57. General Investigations Surveys ...................................................... 4-24 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration .................. 4-24 Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 4-24 Pre-construction Engineering and Design ... 4-25 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 4-26 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ....................... 4-33 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 4-40 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .............................. 4-42 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............................. 4-43 Table 4-F Not Applilcable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ......................... 4-45 Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................... 4-47 Table 4-1 Inspection of Completed Projects........................... 4-48 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT NAVIGATION 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22- foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22- foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49-feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: Studies for completing the remaining new work under the River and Harbor Act of 1958, widening the western five miles of the Connecting Channel (Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension) from 450 to 600 feet wide, were completed during the fiscal year 1997 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 at a total cost of $952,000 ($121,700 during FY 97). The final Baltimore Harbor & Channels, Maryland and Virginia, 42-Foot Project Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, Maryland--Limited Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment, recommending widening of the channel to 600 feet was submitted to Headquarters USACE on August 21, 1997 for approval and approved by Headquarters USACE on October 15, 1997. Engineering and design work to prepare a Project Cooperation Agreement and plans and specifications for dredging were inititated. New Work, Norfolk District: None. Maintenance, Baltimore District. Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Ongoing studies continued for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement to determine the feasibility of using the proposed Site 104 open water placement area in the Chesapeake Bay, and preparation of a decision document and Environmental Assessment to determine the feasibility of costsharing the renovation of the CSX/Cost Creek dredged material containment facility. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Craighill Channel, Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, Brewerton Angle, Northwest Branch West Channel, Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, and Tolchester Channel commenced on January 1, 1999 and was completed on May 10, 1999. Atotal of 2,839,760 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $14,969,887. A contract in the amount of $16,219,140 was awarded on October 7, 1999, to dredge an estimated 3.2 million cubic yards from the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Angle, Ft. McHenry Channel, Curtis Creek Channel,and Tolchester Channel and to deposit the material in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay. Dredging is scheduled to commence in January 2000 and to be completed in April 2000. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the Rappahannock Shoal and Atlantic Ocean Channels were completed. Channels surveys and plans and specifications for dredging the Cape Henry and York Spit Channels were completed. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of exisiting river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 9,720 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Island and the mainland; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Island. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Island; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished placement areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, four oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 11, 1998 to remove 111,000 cubic yards of material. Contractor defaulted and Bonding Company assumed takeover. 4. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, MD. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. Abulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 5. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12233.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work began in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging and breach repair. 6. LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Location. This is a tidal waterway, about 1.5 miles long and from one-eighth to one-half mile wide, branching off from Tangier Sound between Deal Island and Little Deal Island, MD. It is about 12 miles north of Crisfield Harbor, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. The original project was dated March 3, 1881. For further details see page 1790 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, in the marsh at the hand of the cove at Wenona. The cost for new work for the completed project was $39,658, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are three packing-house wharves and a small marine railway above the head of the project channel at Wenona. The facilities are privately owned but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient areas are available for the construction of additional terminals when and as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract was completed to remove 52,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of$417,110. 7. NANTICOKE RIVER, DE AND MD Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 77.) Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet. Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish disposal areas for future maintenance dredging. 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding extends along a considerable portion of waterfront and offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic. Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present and prospective commerce. Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately owned and open to general public use. They consist of one solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and three landings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill and are in poor condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 8. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in the town of North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded on June 30, 1999 to remove 36,700 cubic yards of material. 9. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12211.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authoirzed by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16- and 14-foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests must furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. A maintenance contract was awarded on March 15, 1999 to remove 31,000 cubic yards of material from Isle of Wight Bay. 10. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC, and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 22 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 56,160 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 11. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Location. Alexandria is 3 miles below Washington, DC, on right bank of Potomac River, which flows southeasterly into Chesapeake Bay 105 miles downstream. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing project. Provides for depth of 24 feet in front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. Project area is about 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.8 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $95,215. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2d sess.). Map is the project documents. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Alexandria has 3 regular shipping wharves or landings. Terminal and transfer facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded September 1999. 12. POTOMAC RIVER AT MOUNT VERNON, VA Location. Mount Vernon lies in Fairfax County, VA, about 14 1/2 miles below Washington, DC on the right bank of the Potomac River, which flows in a southeasterly direction into the Chesapeake Bay, 93 1/2 miles downstream from Mount Vernon. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 560.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 200 feet wide and 9 to 10 feet deep, at mean low water, between the main channel of the Potomac River and the Mount Vernon wharf, a distance of about 2,200 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and a radius of 200 feet at the wharf. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.2 feet; irregular, 3 feet; and extreme, 9.7 feet. The cost estimate of the project to the Federal Government made in 1888 was $26,000. There is no approved estimate for annual cost of maintenance. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned and operated wharf on the Mount Vernon estate at the head of the channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. The location of environmentally acceptable placement site is ongoing. 13. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No., 12233, 12286, 12287, 12288, and 12289.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC--a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. Operations and results during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded September 1999. 14. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 81 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks, and fishing appurtenances. There were 74 detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 15. SHALLOW CREEK, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Shallow Creek is a tidal water tributary of the Chesapeake Bay and is located directly adjacent to Fort Howard Veteran's Hospital in southeast Baltimore County, approximately 10 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. (see NOAA Chart No. 12278). Existing Project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in the Patapsco River through the mouth of Shallow Creek and with a turning basis 100 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 5 feet deep in Shallow Creek. It includes a spur channel, with the width varying between 40 feet and 30 feet, and a depth of 4 feet from the existing Federal channel into the northern reach of the creek. Total project length is approximately 5,940 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to provide or pay to the Government the full cost of providing dredged material disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. For the new spur channel the local sponsor is responsible for sharing the cost of the placement site with the Government. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract was awarded on September 7, 1999 to dredge a new spur channel. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded along with spur channel to remove 20,700 cubic yards of material. 16. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, MD Location. The Tolchester Channel is located along the eastern side of the upper Chesapeake Bay, near Tolchester Beach, Kent County, Maryland (see National Ocean Survey Chart 12278). Existing Project. The Tolchester Channel is a uniform channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide with widening at the bends, and 7 miles long that follows the naturally deeper water along the eastern side of the upper Chesapeake Bay. The mean range of tide is 1.2 feet. Depths refer to mean lower low water. The project provides for constructing a new straight channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2 miles long to replace the existing the Tolchester Channel S-Turn, which has several turns within a 3-mile long reach of channel. Estimated cost of new work is $13,919,300. Local cooperation. Terminal facilities are described under the Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD and VA, Federal navigation project. Terminal faciliites. Terminal facilities are described under the Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD and VA, Federal navigation project. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design activities were initiated for straightening the Tolchester Channel S-Turn. 17. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60-feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish placement sites for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pileand- timber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract for repair of the twin jetties was not completed due to weather delay and performance problem. Anticipate completion in FY 2000. 18. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Location. Natural waterway lying between Deal Island and mainland of Somerset County, MD., on eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 277 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Entrance channel from Tangier Sound 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, thence of irregular width to and along south shore of Thorofare, protected by two stone breakwaters at entrance, north breakwater is about 410 feet long and south breakwater about 310 feet long, with a turning basin at inner end 9 feet deep on south side of channel to within 50 feet of bulkhead along south 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT shore, an anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending across waterway parallel to highway bridge to within 50 feet of bulkhead on south shore, and an anchorage area 650 feet long, 300 feet wide, and 9 feet deep on north side of channel between breakwater and 6-foot anchorage. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $62,116. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A small packing-house wharf on shore of Tangier Sound south of project channel: two small packing houses along approach channel at which seafood is landed; and a public wharf at turning basin with a suitable road connecting it with the road system. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished for future maintenance dredging. 19. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within the District of Columbia at junction of the Anacostia River with the Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to the Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Channel Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream ofArlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operations and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is .35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight government piers and slips. None of the piers is open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 20. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is the site of an improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, about 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from the mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for the completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on the previous project. Local cooperation. Fully met, except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-and -timber wharf about 4 miles above the mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Fueling facilities are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 30, 1999 to remove approximately 76,000 cubic yards from the lower portions of the project and from Webster Cove. 21. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIALAUTHORIZATION Fiscal year cost were $323,712 for Neale Sound, MD, $265 for Coan River, VA; $17,222 for Rockhold Creek, MD; $5,105 for Section 107 Coordination; $150,914 for Shallow Creek Spur Channel, MD; $11,051 for Tedious Creek, and $38,593 for Webster's Cove, Somerset County, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $115,481 for Molly Ann's Brook Project, PA and $7,777 for Coan River, VA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 23. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). None. 24. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, MD, which is about 35 miles south of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a steel sheetpile bulkhead along the oceanward edge of the boardwalk from about 4th Street to 27th Street and a sand dune from 27th Street to about 0.3 mile across the Delaware line. The bulkhead is fronted by a 165-foot wide beach, and the dune is fronted by a 100-foot wide beach. The project also provides for periodic nourishment over the 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $500,000,000 (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion) which includes $44,881,000 for initial construction and $455,119,000 for periodic nourishment. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Beach monitoring continued throughout the fiscal year. FLOOD CONTROL 25. BROAD TOP REGION, PA Location. The project is located in South Central Pennsylvania, and includes portions of Bedford, Fulton, and Huntingdon Counties. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets Saltillo, PA, and Saxton, PA.) Existing project. Section 304 of the water resources development Act of 1992, as amended provides for a pilot project to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintenance and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine draining and other runoff. A Master Plan, prepared at a cost of $400,000 identified many potential projects in the Broad Top Region. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Water Supply and Environmental Restoration project was developed as the initial pilot project. The project consists of two components-- replacement and upgrade of the Water Supply System for the villages of Wood and Robertsdale and the restoration of abandoned mine sites at Rocky Ridge South and Defiance North. The current estimated total project cost is $6,975,000, which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Federal funds allocated for the project are $5,000,000. Local cooperation. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Joint Municipal Authority is the non-Federal sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to provide 25% of the cost of the project, including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed for the water supply and Rocky Ridge South components of the project utilizing three separate contracts by the Corps, non-Federal sponsor, and PA Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation. 26. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On the North Branch of the Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junctoin with the South Branch 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. The Chesapeake and Ohio (C&O) Canal stretches 184.5 miles along the Potomac River from the District of Columbia to its terminus in Cumberland, MD, Allegany County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements on the North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal cost of new work for the completed project is $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Section 310 of WRDA 99 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to undertake "restoration of the historic Chesapeake and Ohio Canal substantially in accordance with the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park".... The plan envisioned is to re-build and rewater 1.1 miles of the historic C&O Canal terminus at Cumberland. The turning basin was filled in by the Corps in the 1950's as part of the Cumberland, MD-Ridgeley, WV Flood Protection Project. The current estimated total project cost is $15,000,000 which includes $1.36 million for pre-construction activities. Local cooperation. Fully met for the completed project. The City of Cumberland is the non-Federal sponsor for the new work. The local sponsor is required to provide 35% of the cost of the project, including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations. In-kind services are permitted to count towards the sponsors's share to include those incurred prior to a signal project cooperation agreement. The National Park Service (NPS) is responsible for operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Rewatering design is 50 percent complete and a draft environmental assessment and value engineering study were completed. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 27. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD and Piedmont, WV. (See Geologial Survey quadrangle sheets, Kitzmiller and Westernport, MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streamed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Final project cost is $176,325,300. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. Awater supply contract between the Federal Governmenta dn the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA and the District of Columbia was executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Local interests operate a white water access area below the dam. The State of Maryland has constructed a recreation area on the Maryland side of the lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 28A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interests include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 29. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA, about 194 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, nonstructural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current estimated total project cost is $84,000,000. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municipal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocated buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Swim beach completed. Project will now be closed out. 30. MOOREFIELD, WV Location. Moorefield, WV, is located at the junction of the South Fork (Moorefield River) of the South Branch of the Potomac River, 57 miles upstream from the mouth of the South Branch of the Potomac River, and 233 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Moorefield, WV). Existing project. Provides for a flood warning system, 21,600 feet of earth levee, 1,360 linear feet of floodwall, highway bridge replacement of one span of a railroad bridge, environmental mitigation, and appurtenant project features such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, and ponding areas for local drainage. The current estimated total project cost is $26,925,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Project cooperation. The Town of Moorefield is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed May 12, 1994. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operations, maintenance and replacement of flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) The Water Resources Development Act of 1999 waived the non-Federal requirement to pay its unpaid balance on the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project close-out activities continued during the fiscal year. 31. LACKAWANNA RIVER, OLYPHANT, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quandrangle sheets, Olyphant, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT protection and associated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. The current estimated total project cost is $15,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Borough of Olyphant is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocated buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The Borough of Olyphant continued title searches and surveying in preparation for upcoming real estate acquisitions. Engineering and design continued. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2002. 32. DICKSON CITY, (OLYPHANT), PA Location. Dickson City is located on the Lackawanna River across from the Borough of Olyphant. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Olyphant, PA.) Existing project. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1998 provided 1 million for the Corps to undertake activities leading to construction of flood control measures at Dickson City with the same levels of protection (100-year) as provided to Olyphant, PA. Local cooperation. Dickson City is the sponsor for the project. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay a minimum of 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design work continued to determine if there is federal interest in a flood control project at Dickson City. 33. PETERSBURG WV Location. On the South Branch of the Potomac River in eastern Grant County, WV. (See Geological Survey Quandrangle sheets, Petersburg, East, WV; Petersburg, West, WV; Maysville, WV; and Rig. WV.). Existing project. Provides for 18,460 feet of levee and 900 feet of concrete floodwall along the South Branch, raising of U.S. Route 220 highway bridge, 61,000 cubic yards of channel excavation, ramps, closures, slope protection, relocations, ponding areas for interior drainage, and flood warning system improvements. The current estimated total project cost is $25,251,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. Grant County is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed July 13, 1993. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A follow-on contract for miscellaneous items was completed and project close-out activities continued. 34. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUIJNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results duriing fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Senoia (Marker 8) campground will be completed in November 1999. Multi-purpose building was opened to the public in May 1999. 35. LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Scranton, PA.) Existing project. The Albright Ave. portion of the project provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramps, and associated cultural mitigation. 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1999 provided funding to construct 100-year level flood protection for two additional communities: the Green Ridge Section and the Plot neighborhood. The current estimated total project cost is $55,459,000 which includes $20,934,000 for the Albright Ave. portion, $14,672,000 for the Plot portion and $19,853,000 for the Green Ridge portion of the project. Local cooperation. The City of Scranton is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay a minimum of 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and real estate acquisition by the local sponsor continued on the Albright Ave. portion of the project. A decision document was prepared on the Plot and Green Ridge portions of the project. The Albright Ave. portion of the project is scheduled for completion in September 2002. The overall project is scheduled to be completed in September 2006. 36. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location. The south central Pennsylvania area includes fifteen counties defined by the authorizing legislation. Funds for an additional six counties were provided in the FY 1998 and FY 1999 Energy and Water Appropriation Act. The program area within the Baltimore District consists of the Chesapeake Bay watershed portion of the program area including Bedford, Blair, Clearfield, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Juniata, Mifflin, Snyder, and a portion of Cambria Counties. Existing project. Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended, established a pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non- Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for waste water treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements to the sponsor. Section 313 as amended authorizes Federal appropriations of $180 million to carry out the program, including $90 million within the Chesapeake Bay watershed area. From FY 94 through FY99, Congress has added $56,667,000 to the Corps budget for 45 projects in the Baltimore District. This includes two Master Plans; 15 Projects for water supply and distribution; 20 for wastewater collection and treatment; 6 combined improvements for water, wastewater and stormwater; and two for stormwater and flood control. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Of the 45 projects in the Baltimore District, 1 construction project and 2 studies were completed prior to FY 99. With FY 99 funds of $22,800,000 for 27 new projects and carry over funds for 15 projects, the District completed sponsor construction of Greenfield, Covington and Athens; continued sponsor construction of Broad Top/Coaldale; initiated sponsor construction of Chestnut Ridge and Armstrong; continued Corps design of Hollidaysburg, and continued sponsor design of 35 projects. 37. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL Location. The eight projects within the Baltimore District are located in the City of Altoona, Logan Township and Allegheny Township; Carbon Township; Coalmont Borough; Rock Hill Furnace Borough; the Borough of Everett; Bedford County; Newton Hamilton Borough; and Huntingdon Borough in Pennsylvania. Existing project. Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, as amended, provides for design and construction of structural and non-structual flood control, streambank protection, stormwater management and channel clearing and modificaton measures in the Lower Allegheny and Lower Monongahela (Pittsburgh District) and West Branch Susquehanna River and Juniata River basins, Pennsylvania at a level of production that is sufficient to prevent any future losses to communities in the basins from flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but no less than a 100-year level of flood protection with respect to measures that incorporate levees or floodwalls. The current estimated total project cost is $16,532,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. Local sponsors identified to date include Everett and Logan Township/Altoona. The sponsors are required to: provide lands, easement, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; provide cash contributions such that their total share including lands and relocations is a minimum of 25 percent; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance. 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Negotiations were initiated for the design phase study for Logan Township/Altoona (Mill Run) project, and sponsor coordination was conducted for the Everett project. Coordination continued to identify sponsors for six other projects. 38. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protections are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 38A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles Upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 38E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17, a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet about Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood ofrecord, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bonnets Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bonnets Creek and in the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38G CORNING NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Comrning, NY.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls, about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excava- 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT tion, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the steambed and consists of a concrete gravitytype section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet b 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creet drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operations and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38I. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elimira, NY, about 27 miles stream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet about East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Repair to deteriorated riprap were completed in October 1999. 38K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5- foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the Village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder is used to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 40A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing dayuse recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is $55,198,00 of which $1,257,00 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non-Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocation to water supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractural agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Repairs to the quality control gates is scheduled for completion in December 1999. 40B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Painting of Lambs Creek bridge was completed in May 1999. 41. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek), and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard). In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 41A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R Bush (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 41B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, the project was modified in September 1992, in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from conservation to water supply. The reallocation project includes a year-round normal pool and modifications to the existing recreation area. Estimated cost of the modification is $1.7 million which is being funded entirely by the local sponsor, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. In addition, the sponsor will reimburse the Federal Government about 4.5 million for part of the original project cost. Local cooperation. The 1992 project modification requires non-Federal interests to pay 100 percent of costs allocated to water supply plus the allocated share of the original project cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they must pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacement allocated to water supply. A water supply contract was executed on September 30, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for construction were finalized in June 1996 and a construction contract was awarded 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT August 19, 1996. The overall project completion date was August 1997. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Emergency repairs to beach area were completed June 1999. 41C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Modification to gate repair contract made to fix bent stem brackets. Repair work is to be completed December 1999. 42. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) Location. The Wyoming Valley flood control projects are located in Northeastern Pennsylvania on the Susquehanna River in Luzerne County and are the four contiguous existing Federal flood control projects at Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Township, which together function as a flood control system within the Wyoming Valley. Existing project. The proposed modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 feet, structural, mechanical and electrical modifications to pump stations, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. The proposed project also includes a plan to reduce project-related adverse impacts. The current estimated total project is $175,000,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Luzerne County Flood Protection Authority is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay a minimum of 5% of costs allocated to flood control and pay 50% of costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operations, maintenance and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work was essentially completed on the Swoyersville-Forty Fort levee raising and the sanitary pump stations contracts and continued on the Kingston-Edwardsville contract (50% complete). A construction contract for Wilkes-Barre/ Hanover Township I levee raising was awarded April 13, 1999 and is 15% complete. Engineering and design also continued. 43. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for York and Hanover, PA.) Existing project. IndianRock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. The dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment, and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. The reservoir will control the entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28,1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Repair of deteriorated drainage pipes through Codorus Creek levee was completed May 1999. 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 44. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See table 4-1. 45. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $2,277,026.79. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $132,394.84. 46. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Cost for the period was $243,130 for the Disaster Preparedness Program; $116,985 for Mobilization, Continuity of Government and Emergency Water Preparedness Programs; $49,913 for Emergency Operations; $4,649 for Rehabilitations; $56,803 for the Nationwide Civil Works Activities; and cost for the period for Advance Measures was $703,326 for Assateague Island Breach Contingency. Federal year costs were $10,002 for Section 205 Coordination $47,177 for Anacostia Flood Warning System; $25,328 for Elkton, MD; $46,041 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; $16,618 for Lycoming County Flood Warning System, PA; and $35 for Marsh Run, Borough of Dushore, PA; $989 for Lower West Branch Susquehanna River; $984 for Loyalsock Creek, Borough of Dushore, PA; $758 for Sunbury, PA; $6,935 for William Hagerman's Flume, PA; $996 for Dry Creek, Cortland, NY; $997 for Heshbon to Hepburnville, Lycoming County, PA; $18,155 for Juniata River, Borough of Alexandria, PA; $997 for McClure Run (POCO Farm Area), PA; $997 for Muncy Creek Township, PA; and $18,538 for South River, City of Waynesboro, VA. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $10,973 for Section 14 Coordination; $23,192 for Chesapeake Bay State Route 261, MD; $20,479 for Deep Rum, Race Road, MD; $63,830 for Hudson Branch, Colored Schoolhouse; $980 for Little Muncy Creek, Lairdsville, PA; $14,973 for Loyalsock Creek, Warrensville, PA; $14,584 for Susquehanna River, Hepburn Street, PA; $992 for Tioga County Facilities, PA; $37,002 for Toms Creek Water Supply Dike, Carroll, VA; $76,912 for Hooper Island Causeway, MD; and ($354) for Shallimar- Kitzmiller, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs were: $208,075 for Hooper Island Causeway, MD and $1,673 for Shallimar- Kitzmiller, MD. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 47. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD AND DC Location. The project area is the 170-square mile watershed of the Anacostia River. This watershed encompasses approximately 145 square miles in Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, Maryland, and 25 square miles in the District of Columbia. The entire area is within the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Existing project. The authorized plan provides for the construction of 80 acres of tidal and non-tidal freshwater wetlands, the restoration of 5 miles of piedmont streams, and the planting of 33 acres of bottomland hardwood forest within the highly urbanized Anacostia River watershed. The construction is located at 13 sites within the project area. The 13 actions include 2 wetland restorations, development of 5 stormwater management wetlands areas, and restoration of 6 stream reaches. The current estimated total cost for the Anacostia environmental restoration project is $16 million. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the project are Montgomery County, Prince George's County, the District of Columbia, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, and the National Park Service. The last two sponsors are the currrent landowners of the project sites. The non-Federal sponsors are required to pay 25 percent of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of the facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project construction began with award of a construction contract for work in Montgomery County on June 30, 1999. Construction is scheduled to continue through September 2001, with project monitoring planned through September 2004. 48. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD Location. The project is located in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Existing project. The authorized project contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Project elements include: construction and rehabilitation of oyster habitat; construction of seed bar 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT facilities for production of oyster seed or "spat"; purchase of disease-free spat from the state-owned hatcheries, planting of disease-free spat in locations which best foster oyster production and health; and monitoring of project performance to increase oyster populations. The current estimated total project cost is $3,334,000. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to pay 25% of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement offish and wildlife facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Seed bars were created in Eastern Bay and new oyster bars were created in the Patuxent, Magothy and Severn Rivers. The State of Maryland placed 12 million spat on these bars. Project monitoring activities continued. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2000, with monitoring planned through September 2004. 49. CHESTER RIVER, BODKIN ISLAND, MD Location. Chester River flows through the central part of Maryland's Eastern Shore, between Kent and Queen Anne's Counties, and is approximately 50 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. Bodkin Island is located in Eastern Bay, approximately 6.8 miles south of the Chester River Federal navigation channel. Existing project. The proposed plan which would provide beneficial use of dredged material includes increasing the total acreage of Bodkin Island to 7.5 acres using approximately 50,000 cubic yards of dredged material from the nearby Federal navigation channel. The current estimated total project cost is $2,000,000. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland Department of Natural Resources is the project sponsor. Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 requires that the sponsor: provide 25 percent of the construction of the project, including provision of lands, easements and rights-of-way and necessary relocations; and pay 100 percent of operation, maintenance, replacement and rehabilitation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Re-evaluation of the project continued by a team that is examining cost effective alternatives to the proposed plan. The channel in Chester River has been realigned to reduce maintenance and is not scheduled to be dredged again for two to three years. 50. LITTLE FALLS DAM FISH PASSAGE, MD Location. Little Falls is located in Montgomery County just upriver from the District of Columbia. Existing project. Little Falls Dam was built in 1959 as a water supply facility for the Washington D.C. metropolitan area. The proposed modification to improve the environment includes a 24-foot notched fishway with a centerline 75 feet from the Virginia shoreline to re-establish migrating fish access to 10 miles of historic spawning habitat upstream of the dam. As part of the project, it is proposed that the anadromous fish population be restored by stocking and imprinting anadromous fish species in the Potomac River upstream of the dam and that a five-year monitoring program be established to verify the effectiveness of the modification. The current estimated total project cost is $2 million. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland Department of Natural Resources is the project sponsor. Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires that the non-Federal share of the cost of any modifications under that authority shall be 25 percent including the cost of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations. The sponsor must also pay 100 percent of operation, maintenance, replacement and rehabilitation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded June 23, 1999. Work began in September 1999 and is scheduled for completion in February 2000. 51. POPLAR ISLAND, MD Location. The group of islands known as Poplar Island is located in the upper middle Chesapeake Bay approximately 34 nautical miles southeast of the Port of Baltimore and 1 mile northwest of Tilghman Island, Talbot County, MD. Existing project. The authorized project provides for the use of approximately 38 million cubic yards of dredged material from the southern approach channels of the Baltimore Harbor and Channels navigation project to restore 1,110 acres of remote habitat. The restoration project will employ dikes to contain the dredged materials necessary for the wetlands vegetation and to protect the facility from the severe wave activity common in this region of the Chesapeake Bay. The placement site will restore Poplar Island to its approximate 1847 configuration and will consist of 555 acres of upland habitat at an elevation up to +20 feet MLLW and 555 acres of wetland habitat that would be further divided into approximately 444 acres of low marsh and 111 acres of high marsh. The current estimated total project cost is $427 million (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion). Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed April 4, 1997. The sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; pay 25% of the cost of the project; and bear all costs of operation, mainte- 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 nance, replacement and major rehabilitation of the ecosystem restoration project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Phase I construction continued throughout the fiscal year and is scheduled to be completed in December 1999. Phase II plans & specifications were initiated in October 1998 with completion expected in December 1999. Phase II construction is scheduled to start in March 2000. REGULATORY PROGRAM 52. REGULATORY PROGRAM During fiscal year 1999, there were 508 pending applications and 4,537 new applications received for permits to proceed with activities in navigable and other waters of the United States including wetlands within Maryland, Washington DC, the Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania, and military bases in Northern Virginia. Of the 4,363 final actions; five were withindrawn and six were denied. The enforcement program began the year with 226 active cases; 79 new violation cases were initiated, and 169 cases were resolved. In addition, 917 jurisdictional verifications were requested and performed and 20 public hearings were held. Total costs during the fiscal year were $4,592,599. WATER SUPPLY 53. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federally owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in the Chief of Engineers (see Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to the Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA, and Montgomery County, MD. Total consumption for fiscal year 1999 was 67.1 billion gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 44.5 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed $32,754,074 of which $8,406,628 was from VA. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 54. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $3,776,074 of which $-33,017 was for navigation studies, $1,147,589 for flood damage prevention studies, $2,047,160 for special studies, $12,772 for review of completed projects, $440,191 for special investigations, $25,209 for interagency water resource development, and $136,170 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $1,359,219 of which $75,460 was for navigation studies, $1,147,589 for flood damage prevention studies, and $136,170 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interest. 55. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Fiscal year costs were $454 for Section 206 Coordination; $56,051 forPreliminaryPlans; $76,915 for Chesapeake Bay Environmental Restoration; $5,726 for Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, MD; $22,854 for Dents Run, MD; $5,402 for Isle of Wight Bay, MD; $150,802 for Lackawanna, PA; $98,870 for Ocean Pines, Worcester County, MD; $797 for Seeley Creek, MD; and $121,520 for Upper Susquehanna- Lackawanna Watershed, PA. Fiscal year miscellaneous costs were $501 for Coordination Account Funds and $14 for Initial Appraisals. 56. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $208,734. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 57. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Washington, DC & Vicinity--The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street), regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Total costs during the fiscal year were $22,480. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,992,000. Baltimore Harbor & Anchorages, MD --The proposed project would: widen and deepen Federal anchorages, widen branch channels, dredge a new branch channel, dredge a turning basin and deauthorize an existing anchorage. Total costs during the fiscal year were $113,522. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $900,000, of which $675,000 is Federal and $225,000 is non-Federal. 4-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY% FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Honga River & Tar Bay, MD 4. Knapps Narrows, MD 5. Little Wicomico River, MD 6. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD 7. Nanticoke River, Northwest Fork, MD & DE 8. Northeast River, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 231,000 0 317,480 110,505 11,823,000 10,888,000 11,411,410 11,268,468 -- 108,000 -- 124,837 378,100 378,109 782,200 715,475 404,500 404,500 (80,000) (192,418) 16,288,000 15,267,157 527,674 497,983 (110,000) 3,810 17,155,000 17,162,474 47,500 18,496 320,000 348,000 373,000 319,082 344,122 373,555 66,000 354,000 790,933 141,289 352,828 789,570 -- 84,000 53,000 -- 83,759 52,764 38,500 36,996 -- 39,999 -- 39,211 144,862,7121 144,815,3871 207,868,6692 207,018,0862 67,717,114 66,820,847 7,642,699 7,647,748 66,1193 66,119 6,903,068 6,933,906 0 23,836 23,836 531,010 530,773 81,8854 81,8864 2,369,976 2,366,485 -- 62,000 -- 1,849,1585 -- 45,253 -- 1,832,4115 -- -- 509,000 1,229,142 -- -- 524,673 1,267,815 -- -- -- 350,000 -- -- -- 350,000 -- 47,000 -- 46,961 37,000 27,740 50,000 25,000 502,000 57,977 23,645 506,749 73,2435 73,243' 1,163,841 1,182,647 28,4896 28,4896 1,652,344 1,621,980 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 9. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 10. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC Collection & Removal of Drift 11. Potomac River atAlexandria, VA 12. Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, MD 13. Potomac River Below Washington, DC 14. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 15. Shallow Creek, MD 16. Tolchester Channel, MD 17. Twitch Cove & Big Thorofare, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 124,500 125,282 864,000 858,594 -- 60,000 36,589 -- -- -- 362,193 -- -- -- 362,193 634,100 49,000 338,000 12,254,800 634,012 46,713 339,515 12,253,773 759,000 831,000 764,000 15,047,375 766,753 828,458 762,184 15,040,201 41,000 174,100 160,000 41,798 141,704 215,295 -- 17,452 -- 9,842 100,000 90,822 500,000 503,242 -- 25,000 25,000 95,214 95,214 1,093,258 1,093,543 17,0008 17,0008 360,917 350,453 -- -- -- 254,036 -- -- -- 244,858 62,000 176,000 193,000 2,712,294 59,450 145,553 233,584 3,219,881 577,000 551,000 559,000 10,279,045 578,054 544,192 562,412 10,274,801 -- 31,000 140,000 -- 24,845 60,838 -- 100,000 -- 67,869 144,100 115,050 1,968,433 1,882,034 00 100,000 67,869 -- -- -- 424,800 -- -- -- 424,800 1,242,000 844,100 671 000 6,350,111 1,261,707 849,728 670,772 6,306,449 4-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-A(Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 18. Upper Thorofare, MD 19. Washington Harbor, DC 20. Wicomico River, MD 24. Atlantic Coast of Maryland 25. Broad Top Region, PA 26. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 27. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV 28A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA 29. LockHaven, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost -- 52,000 -- 43,074 34,100 35,050 130,000 123,464 0 92,716 121,260 175,820 24,800 21,000 22,616 19,518 (2,452) 6,474 62,446 62,446 864,205 864,205 -- 3,191,077 9 -- 3,191,0779 13,000 5,205,68310,�11 16,557 5,205,47410,11 -- -- -- 471,60912 -- -- -- 471,60912 2,015,410 78,000 272,000 12,117,515 2,023,344 76,464 272,802 12.118,317 0 136,115 68,910 58,752 4,701,000 3,760,164 5,018,670 4,234,108 393,000 891,050 393,000 891,050 0 0 0 0 1 514,718 2,747,659 1,107,840 83,000 86,698 1,806,000 1,778,273 147,000 147,600 (370,000) (356,552) 274,893 510,640 97,000 92,776 352,000 57,148 -- 150,000 -- 11,648 2,122,650 2,301,000 2,165,781 2,286,156 -- 6,350 -- 6,350 0 94,963 87,000 92,950 146,100 187,512 1,574,000 1,572,976 32,004,000 31,932,347 22,084,052 21,680,982 100,000 4,440,181 15,634,070 15,729,033 1,905,513 1,612,387 176,621,400 176,532,893 25,529,572 25,502,447 6,350 6,350 -- -- -- 2,320,410 -- -- -- 2,320,410 201,000 199,000 226,000 3,022,523 204,245 199,220 225,578 3,022,035 0 42,117 100,000 0 80,000 301,301 124,196 121,453 0 34,349 0 84,755 55,235,000 55,288,857 18,246,064 6,856,340 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 30. Moorefield, WV 31. Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA 32. Dickson City, (Olyphant), PA 33. Petersburg, WV 34. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 35. Scranton, New Work Lackawanna River, PA Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 36. South Central New Work Environmental Restor- Approp. ation Infrastructure Cost and Resource Protec- Contributed tion Development Approp. Pilot, PA Cost 37. WV and PA Flooding New Work Program Approp. Cost 8,374,100 7,806,602 1,073,757 849,288 170,000 637,460 00 8,633,000 6,953,624 13,256 212,189 1,580,000 2,245,941 473 14,013 (800,000) 483,826 0 5,855 577,000 400,000 6,800,000 246,758 403,825 369,335 0 1,000,000 0 0 45,377 309,152 6,495,000 7,077,000 6,448,069 5,983,414 -- 80,000 -- 80,000 3,425,000 4,865,817 5,556,000 4,807,190 7,500 0 377,000 339,000 617,428 217,032 -- 28,800 -- 0 1,750,000 1,708,111 1,595,000 1,615,197 1,850,000 3,357,800 4,291,000 4,172,647 1,531,000 (800,000) 1,719,435 276,448 -- 0 -- 0 4,750,800 5,674,106 3,050 650 5,425,000 1,131,921 12,200 0 15,350,000 1,550,027 (240,825) (29,884) -- 1,000,000 900,000 -- 16,997 1,952 18,988,100 18,568,172 1,205,602 1,199,461 9,047,000 2,246,374 1,000,000 354,529 18,640,000 18,524,951 80,000 80,000 -- 77,418,770 -- 77,418,770 4,563,000 62,686,415 4,653,854 62,574,302 5,000 15,550 10,629 11,279 38,651,000 704,343 23,566,775 8,639,568 (15,552) (8,076) 250,000 25,942 45,792,000 3,411,717 41,000 0 51,016,7275 15,996,020 5,672,923 5,772,925 2,150,000 44,891 38A. Addison, NY 38B. Almond Lake, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8,000 8,863 405,000 411,963 13,000 12,345 5,010 5,740 -- 827,050 -- 827,050 11,500 330,565 7,998 327,064 -- -- -- 5,760,211 -- -- -- 5,760,211 493,000 427,000 422,000 7,858,681 505,537 425,001 424,163 7,830,531 4-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 38C. Arkport Dam, NY 38D. Avoca, NY 38E. Binghamton, NY 38E Canisteo, NY 38G Corning, NY 381. East Sidney Lake, NY 38L Elmira, NY 38J. Hornell, NY 38K Lisle, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 177,100 150,532 14,100 14,247 40,000 44,850 32,000 31,640 61,800 59,906 436,000 468,308 12,000 13,025 158,000 169,179 26,100 26,859 -- -- -- 1,910,00013 -- -- -- 1,910,000 227,100 213,000 199,000 3,876,812 261,158 214,078 198,655 3,876,422 20,000 15,819 6,100 10,491 41,000 101,600 41,491 97,670 50,000 42,756 10,200 18,142 51,600 47,280 48,065 52,762 -- 436,37414 -- 0 9,500 574,761 9,132 574,245 -- 3,460,00015 -- 3,460,00015 41,000 946,981 45,089 946,530 40,000 39,079 1,183,11116 1,183,11116 1,124,235 1,123,257 -- 3,322,00017 -- 3,322,00017 41,000 1,263,278 40,218 1,263,440 -- -- -- 6,049,504 -- -- -- 6,049,504 460,000 479,000 436,000 9,803,771 467,499 464,032 452,920 9,873,600 18,500 12,810 1,760 7,446 160,000 147,030 167,1( 162,189 148,312 157,8 37,300 22,550 31,500 28,115 -- 6,883,305 -- 6,883,305 18,000 442,809 18,004 442,809 -- 4,558,69818 -- 4,558,69818 00 9,966,706 80 9,957,334 -- 661,19919 -- 661,199' 00 1,041,072 89 1,040,021 28,0( 27,3E 4-30 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A(Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 38L. Oxford, NY 38M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 38N. Whitney Point Village, NY 39. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 40A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 40B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 41A. Alvin R Bush Dam, PA 41B. Curwensville Lake, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 14,100 16,619 2,461,000 2,945,401 18,000 18,599 325,500 336,909 0 2,670 1,862,000 2,307,851 2,477,900 2,416,505 519,000 537,348 653,600 671,420 249,600 135,400 27,500 (2,230) 18,740 6,592 -- 131,00020 -- 131,0002 19,000 378,102 19,027 378,104 -- -- -- 5,421,540 -- -- -- 5,421,540 587,900 596,800 515,000 14,397,996 603,349 547,990 566,990 14,560,883 36,000 14,700 26,448 24,040 336,900 336,812 -- 424,196 -- 424,196 4,900 573,081 5,226 573,093 -~- -- 328,000 343,000 334,136 343,025 5,725,700 5,725,700 5,981,990 5,980,994 -- -- -- 107,470,700 -- -- -- 107,470,751 1,615,800 1,459,000 2,317,000 23,863,181 685,483 1,416,058 2,359,014 22,866,379 -- -- 124,068 13,619,344 -- -- 124,067 13,639,342 -- -- -- 186,244,800 -- -- -- 186,244,800 2,280,000 2,615,200 2,089,000 33,302,143 2,419,061 2,355,484 2,356,276 33,288,243 579,000 493,000 598,440 492,083 669,000 685,483 990,410 1,169,309 636,000 625,265 35,000 53,285 639,000 640,001 7,103,001 7,103,001 12,126,076 12,134,937 -- 20,406,060 -- 20,406,060 624,000 14,537,176 629,459 14,529,719 21,143 1,276,153 13,474 1,371,468 4-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 41C. Foster Joseph Sayers, New Work_ Dam, PA 42. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) 43. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA 47. Anacostia River & Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Tributaries, MD & DC Approp. Cost 48. Chesapeake Bay New Work Oyster Recovery, MD Approp. Cost 742,900 773,682 2,021,000 2,090,356 300,000 -- .-- 1,413,000 1,481,606 11,000 211,428 -- -- -- 30,887,06321 -- -- -- 30,887,06321 1,152,200 701,000 771,000 15,168,308 1,150,160 721,185 776,771 4,727,084 10,307,000 4,790,496 500,000 182,435 8,596,000 11,543,597 1,000,000 852,321 10,919,000 9,641,663 5,950,000 2,845,621 31,177,048 29,899,711 7,450,000 3,880,377 -- -- -- 5,601,16722 -- -- -- 5,601,1672 2,129,000 505,410 446,000 16,811,79023 2,151,907 504,286 429,924 16,797,75323 -- 2,401,000 (868,000) -- 750,516 445,639 495,000 509,000 705,000 500,809 450,813 811,901 1,533,000 1,196,155 2,141,000 2,124,131 49. Chester River, Bodkin Island, MD 50. Little Falls Fish Passage #2, MD 51. Poplar Island, MD New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 0 7,268 120,000 125,090 0 5,000 3,975 5,233 -- 2,975,000 -- 1,406,474 20,000 67,000 24,297 66,995 -- 3,042,000 -- 1,406,474 130,000 44,000 512,700 124,646 56,371 415,081 -- -- 215,000 -- -- 56,337 -- 757,000 -- 743,614 -- 50,000 -- 0 13,542,000 8,512,844 2,975,000 1,386,474 20,518,000 25,017,546 9,300,000 10,471,436 909,200 796,161 215,000 56,337 34,817,000 34,274,004 12,325,000 11,857,910 1. Includes $8,467,003 for previous projects. 2. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 3. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 4. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 5. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 6. Includes $20,641 for previous projects. 7. Includes $283,008 public works funds adn $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 8. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 9. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 10. Excludes $1,831,609 for previous project. 11. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 12. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 13. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 14. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 15. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 16. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 17. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 18. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 19. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 20. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 21. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary system for public use. 22. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 23. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-32 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. BALTIMORE HARBORAND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head to Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.' Jan 21, 1927 Jul 3, 1930 H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilitiesRivers and Harbors Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordinance Depot Mar 2, Uniform main channel 309 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec, 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 1970 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch--East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch--West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and WorkAuthorized time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long witha maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTIONAND REMOVALOF DRIFT Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. 3. 4. 5. 6. Jun. 30, 1948 4-34 2. HONGA RIVERAND TAR BAY, MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay 1935 through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide 1948 from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean lowwater, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay in deep water in Harris Creek, MD with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public WorksAdmninistration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. LITTLE WICOMICORIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water in 1935 Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet oftimber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. LOWER THOROFARE, DEALISLAND, MD Jun. 25, A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, from Tangier Sound to the wharves at 1910 Wenona; widening the angles and the end to furnish anchorage basins. Mar. 2, Modified to provide a channel 60 feet wide, 7 feet deep from Tangier Sound to 1945 and including a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. Mar. 7, Constructing a stone breakwater within Lower Thorofare, and a stone jetty on 1986 Deal Island to reduce channel maintenance. Sec 107 NANTICOKE RIVER, DE AND MD Jun. 3, A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. 1896 Jun. 25, Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. 1910 Jun. 25, A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning 1910 basin. Mar. 2, A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to 1945 highway bridge at Seaford, DE. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot of 1937 Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Documents River and Harbor Act of 1948 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 74th Cong., lst Sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1lst Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 24, 72nd Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doe. 76, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 76th Cong., 1lst Sess. Detailed Project. Rpt. Mar. 8, 1984 H. Doc. 333, 53rd Cong..,3rd Sess., andAnnual Report, 1985, p. 1165. H. Doc. 674, 61st Cong.,2nd Sess. H. Do. 869, 60th Cong., 1lst Sess.2 S. Doc. 69, 77th Cong., 1lst Sess. H. Do. 248 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 8. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and WorkAuthorized Documents 9. OCEAN CITY HARBORAND INLETAND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 feet 1935 deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west 1935 side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3g Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 1945 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIARIVERS, DC, COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac andAnacostia 1985 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon. VA POTOMAC RIVER ATALEXANDRIA, VA Jun. 25, A channel 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide for depth of 24 feet in 1910 front ofAlexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. POTOMAC RIVERAT MT. VERNON, MD Mar. 3, Channel 6 to 7 feet deep, 150 feet wide, from Potomac River channel to Mount 1879 Vernon wharf, with turning basin at wharf. Channel increased to 9-to 10-feet depth, 200-foot width, turning basin to have 200-foot radius. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 30, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its 1935 tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and despositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) SHALLOW CREEK May 22, 1987 Sec. 107 Jul. 13, 1999 Sec. 107 16. Dredging a navigation channel, 5 feet deep at mean low water, 50 feet wide, and 2,700 feet long from the Patapsco River to a turning basin, 100 feet wide by 100 feet long at the head of creek. Dredging a navigation spur channel, 4 feet deep at mean low water, 30-40 feet wide and 1,940 feet long from the existing Federal channel into the northern reach of the creek. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, MD Aug. 5, Dredge anew straight channel 35 feet deep, 1999 600 feet wide, and 2 miles long to replace the existing Tolchester Channel S-Turn off Tolchester Beach. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1lst Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report, 1879, vol. 1, p. 83. Annual Report, 1888, vol. 1, p. 814. H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1lst Sess. River andHarborAct, June 28, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 29, 1959 Detailed Project Report Jan. 1986 Detailed Project Report, May 21, 1996 Water Resources Dev. Act of 1999 4-35 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17. 18. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big Thorofare River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD A 9-foot channel 75 feet wide protected by breakwater at entrance, with turning basin at inner end and anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Widen entrance channel to 100 feet, extend 9-foot turning basin and 6-foot anchorage, and dredging an additional anchorage area on north side of channel. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant, (d)Anacostia River fromAnacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. 20. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel belowthe Main Street Bridge. Aug. 26, A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south 1937 prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a Tshaped harbor. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware line; 1986 a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to Fourth Street; and widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. BROAD TOPREGION, PA Oct. 31, Pilot program to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, 1992 and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintaining and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. H. Doc. 285, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 72nd Cong., 1lst Sess. H. Doc. 76, 75th Cong., 1lst Sess.l Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1lst Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947 H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 2 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sept. 29, 1981 P.L. 102-580 4-36 19. 24. 25. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and WorkAuthorized Documents Sec. 581 of WRDA 1996 26. Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 27. Oct. 23, 1962 Provided for non-Federal sponsor credit for design and construction prior to PCA execution; allowed for Federal share of project costs to be provided in the form of grant or reimbursement of project costs. CUMBERLAND, MD, ANDRIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MDAND WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. LACKAWANNARIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction ofAylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania LOCKHAVEN, PA Nov. 17, Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet concrete floodwall along the 1986 West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. MOOREFIELD, WV Nov. 28, Levee, floodwall, closures, relocations, and improvements to the flood warning 1990 system. OLYPHANT LACKAWANNARIVER, PA Oct. 31, Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure 1992 structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and asscociated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. DICKSON CITY, PA Oct. 13, Provides for Corps to undertake activities leading to construction of flood 1997 control measures at Dickson City, with the same level of protection as Olyphant, PA. PETERSBURQ WV Nov. 28, Channel improvements, levee and floodwall, closures, relocations, and improve- 1990 ments to the flood warning system. RAYSTOWNIAKE, RAYSTOWNBRANCH, JUNIATARIVER, PA Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SCRANTON, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Oct. 31, Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure 1992 structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramp, and P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1lst Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 23, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 P.L. 105-62 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1990 H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 4-37 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents associated cultural mitigation. Modified Directs Secretary to carry out the project for Plot and Green Ridge sections and P.L. 104-303 by Act of allows non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in Oct. 12, accordance with Section 903(c) of WRDA 86. 1996 SOUTH CENTRALPENNSYLVANIAENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Oct. 31, Pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 1992 South Central Pennsylvania. Modified Expanded scope to include 15 counties; increased program authorization limits by Acts of to $50 million; provided for non-Federal sponsor credit for design and con- Nov. 13, struction prior to PCA execution; allowed for Federal share of project costs to 1995 be provided in the form of grants or reimbursement of project costs; and provided the non-Federal sponsors to receive credit for reasonable interest to provide non-Federal share of project's cost. Oct. 13, Increased program authorization to $80 million and allowed for more non- 1997 Federal credits. Added six counties to the program area. PA& WVFLOODINGPROGRAM Oct. 12, Provides for design and construction of structural and non-structural flood 1996 control, streambank protection, stormwater management and channel WRDA 96 clearing and modification measures in the West Branch Susquehanna River and Juniata River Basins in Pennsylvania. Aug. 17 Requires flood protection not less than 100-year level for measures that 1999 incorporate levees or floodwalls. WRDA 99 Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 1, 1983 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Homrnell, Comrning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NYAND PA Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hannond reservoirs, local flood protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by Sec. tion 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). P.L. 102-580 P.L. 104-46 EPL. 104-303 P.L. 105-62 EPL. 104-303 EPL. 106-53 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-38 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. t 7 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNARIVER, PA Construction of three flood control reservoirs. WYOMINGVALLEY, PA(LEVEE RAISING) Nov. 17, Modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 1986 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. YORK INDIAN ROCKDAM, PA Jun. 22, 1936 Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus Creek. ANACOSTIARIVERAND TRIBUTARIES, MDAND DC Oct. 12, The project consists of two wetland restoration sites in the District of Columbia, 1996 one stream restoration site and one stormwater wetland site in Prince George's County, and nine stream restoration and stormwater wetland sites in Montgomery County. The project will restore a total of 80 acres of tidal and non-tidal freshwater wetlands, 5 miles of piedmont streams, and 33 acres of bottomland hardwood forest within the highly urbanized Anacostia River watershed. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTERRECOVERY, MD Nov. 17, Contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in 1986 the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. CHESTER RIVER BODKIN ISLAND, MD Apr. 12, Beneficial use of dredged material from Chester River to increase acreage 1995 of Bodkin Island to 7.5 acres. LITTLE FALLS PASSAGE #2, MD Apr. 12, Modification to improve the environment includes a 24-foot notched fishway 1996 to re-establish migratory fish access to 10 miles of historic habitat upstream of the dam. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND Oct. 12, The project consists of reconstructing Poplar Island to its approximate size in 1996 1847 (1,110 acres), using an estimated 38 million cubic yards of uncontaminated dredged material from maintenance dredging of the southern approach channels of the Baltimore harbor and Channels navigation project. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1lst Sess. Report of the Chief of Egineers dated October 19, 1983 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated November 15, 1994 Ecosystem Restoration Report Ecosystem Restoration Report Report of the Secretary of the Army, dated September 3, 1996 1. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 127 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 2. Contains latest published maps. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 16, 1993. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization was opened just south of Ocean City by natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 4. Included in Emergency Relief Program 1935. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 1956. 4-39 41. 42. 43. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. REPORT OF TIHE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-C OTHERAUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA 1 Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ -- Anacostia River and Flats 2 Deferred 1953 3,910,582 --- Annapolis Harbor, MD Completed 1993 34,2503 51,366 Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,4654 11,770 Back Creek, MD Completed 1946 23,061 41,378 Black Walnut Harbor, MD Completed 1982 32,631 431,478 Bonum Creek, VA Completed 1993 202,2005 468,464 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Completed 1950 15,755 35,684 Breton Bay, MD6 Completed 1950 47,9246 47,593 Broad Creek River, DE Completed 1964 64,5107 167,952 Cambridge Harbor, MD Completed 1993 195,9748 946,934 Chester River, MD Completed 1998 70,495 598,803 Choptank River, MDto Completed 1979 96,796 104,230 Claibomrne Harbor, MD' Deferred 1987 42,974 709,047 Corsica River, MD Completed 1948 39,071"11 134 770 Crisfield Harbor, MD Completed 1998 416,73612 1,895,645 Cypress Creek, MD Completed 1947 3,057 14,729 Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,28914 353,188 Elk and Little Elk rivers, MD3 Completed 1932 90,121 53,80815 Fishing Bay, MD Completed 1998 34,07416 2,161,260 Goose Creek, MD17 Completed 1973 75,900 22,013 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD Completed 1998 133,337 1,105,148 Herring Creek, MD Completed 1989 1,506,259 1,124,317 Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD Completed 1998 1,504,29718 216,265 LaTrappe, MD Completed 1980 8,06419 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,000 7,327 Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 2,100 327,530 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 30,432 Madison Bay, MD17 Completed 1977 125,550 42,643 Manokin River, MD20 Completed 1919 34,78821 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71522 96,785 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1994 22,434 483,685 Muddy Hook Tyler Coves, MD Completed 1996 64,001 687,568 Nan Cove, MD4 Completed 1965 34,86123 33,138 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1995 73,242 604,441 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Neabsco Creek, VA Completed 1998 57,841 1,947,744 Neale Sound, MD Completed 1991 12,60024 945,585 Neavitt Harbor, MD 7 Completed 1968 36,500 45,019 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA25 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Occoquan Creek, VA'3 Completed 1971 66,25326 203,198 Parish Creek, MD Completed 1988 19,17027 533,808 Patuxent River, MD'3 Completed 1905 14,00028 . Pocomoke River, MD Completed 1995 191,726 29 3,454,849 Potomac River- Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, and DC Completed 1998 2,363,589 292,116 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 --- 184,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Completed 1956 1,744,69230 27,46131 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85832 321,803 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1995 304,000 2,368,946 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1998 1,072,500 33 457,157 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,531 19,198 Slaughter Creek, MD Completed 1994 4,140 682,983 St. Catherine's Sound, MD Completed 1989 29,94735 659,369 St. George's Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 --- St. Jerome's Creek, MD Completed 1991 44,35736 756,360 St. Michael's Harbor, MD'7 Completed 1964 16,72337 35,666 St. Patrick's Creek, MD Completed 1987 15,752 151,849 St. Peter's Creek, MD 7 Completed 1963 46,74038 41,223 4-40 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHERAUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 16,448 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,57039 859,051 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA'7 Completed 1974 57,03140 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1996 424,800 464,788 Tedious Creek, MD Completed 1998 2,330,01341 0 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 62,386 Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1994 523,310 927,949 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 19,29742 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,04143 148,728 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous projecst. 5. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 6. Includes $37,500 for previous projects. 7. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous projects. 9. Includes $40,041 for previous projects. 10. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 11. Includes $30,000 for previous projects. 12. Includes $87,741 for previous projects. 13. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 14. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 15. Includes $24,321 for previous projects. 16. Includes $2,840 for previous projects. 17. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 18. Excludes $10,306 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 20. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess.) 21. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 22. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $52,000 from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 25. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 26. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 27. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 28. Includes $10,617 for previous projects. 29. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous projects. 30. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 32. Includes $19,000 for previous projects. 33. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 36. Includes $26,500 for previous projects. 37. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 39. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and $97,390 for previous projects. 40. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 41. Excludes $10,158 contributed funds. 42. Includes $6,000 for previous projects. 43. Excludes $344,952 contributed funds. 4-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Colonial Beach, MD Complete 1995 $ 649,9571 --- Oxford, MD2 Complete 1978 97,7503 --- Punch Island Road, MD Complete 1996 199,105 --- Town of North Beach, MD Complete 1995 450,6104 --- 1. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $245,262 contributed funds. 4-42 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-E OTHERAUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD2 Bainbridge NY 3, 4 Bath, NY Bayard, WV 4 Black Walnut Point, MD Bridgewater, VA4 Bull Run, PA Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD Conklin-Kirkwood, NY Cortland, NY Elkland, PA Endicott Johnson Cit4y and Vestal, NY Forest Heights, MD Fourmile Run, VA Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD'3 Greene, NY 4 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Kitzmiller, MD 4 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD4 Latta Brook Rd., NY McCready's Point Road, MD Middle Hooper Island, MD Nichols, NY4 Norwich, NY Painted Post, NY'5 Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA Plymouth, PA Rooster Island, Dorchester County, MD Savage River Dam, MD Scranton, PA9 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD Sunbury, PA Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA Tyrone, PA25 Unadilla, NY Upper Marlboro MD 4 Verona Lake, VA 7 Washington, DC and Vicinity Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Williamsport, PA Wyoming Valley, PA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed 1995 1977 1959 1970 1965 1985 1953 1984 1993 1955 1970 1971 1979 1964 1987 1989 1951 1979 1965 1992 1984 1993 1993 1974 1950 1970 1998 1958 1998 1954 1971 1993 1993 1993 1953 1968 1991 1980 1970 1965 1978 1953 1958 1979 1987 $ 6,042,325 1,000,000 3 382,000 638,332 55,2186 200,500 136,500 2,742,000 156,4917 71,000 324,486 1,297,850 7,034,53490 430,0001 52,480,000 186,077 37,000 4,731,39411 501,50012 972,988 115,500 74,01913 327,16514 1,487,800 94,500 414,181 48,509"1 1,911,68916 753,791" 2,271,93918 2,006,800 425,96020 70,44121 126,04922 6,06300023 2,728,113 174,49124 6,401,016 1,000,00026 590,013 992,000 331,92728 3,853,45729 12,964,89330 25,549,098 1. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 2. Local interests will not accept opeartion and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 3. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $67,954 Contributed funds. 8. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. Excludes $42,081 contributed funds. Excludes $137,900 contributed funds. Excludes $14,917 contributed funds. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. Excludes $278,801 contributed funds. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 4-43 $3,735,979' --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 19. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 20. Excludes $126,255 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $25,014 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $51,666 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. 25. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 26. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 27. Authorized for the design memorandum state of advanced engineering and design. 28. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 30. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-44 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-G Project Almond Village, NY 1,2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Chani Betterton Harbor, MD Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & HarborAct) Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY 2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD4 Curwensville Lake (WaterLine), PA Davenport Center Lake, NY2 Endicott, Johnson City, and Vestal (Ren Fall Brook Lake, PA6 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date See Annual and Report For Authority 1970 May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act 1920 Nov. 17, 1986 nel) 1966 Water Res. Dev. Act 1960 Dec. 31,1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1950 Dec. 31,1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1949 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1949 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1989 Dec 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1940 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act. 1988 Dec. 31,1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1937 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1978 Jan 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act 1977 Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act --- Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act nedial), NY5 --- Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1954 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1937 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1950 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-45 Contributed Funds Expended Federal Funds Expended $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-G(Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Lake Ogleton, MD 1950 Nov. 6, 1977 --- --- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA5 Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA South Plymouth Lake, NY Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA7 Tyrone, PA Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY2 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1958. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. 5. 6. 7. Project deauthorized by Section 100(A) of Public Law 99-662. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 4-46 1949 1941 1978 1989 1989 1989 1971 1974 1953 1980 1939 1970 Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 1, 1997 1992 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 7,9283 14,600 --- --- - .- 100,0363 --- 6,401,016 305 189,1003 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Project Completed DC Anacostia River Feb. 1999 MARYLAND Broad Creek Jul 1999 Chester River Jul 1999 Crisfield Harbor Jul 1999 Herring Creek Sep 1999 Lowes Wharf Aug 1999 Madison Bay Aug 1999 Middle River and Dark Head Creek Jun 1999 Neale Sound Feb 1999 Neavitt Harabor Aug 1999 Pocomoke River Aug 1999 Rock Hall Harbor Aug 1999 St. Jerome Creek Apr 1999 St. Michaels Aug 1999 St. Peters Creek Apr 1999 Slaughter Creek Sep 1999 Susquehanna River above & below Havre de Gravce Apr 1999 Town Creek Aug 1999 Tred Avon River Aug 1999 Twitch Cove & Big Thorofare River Jul 1999 VIRGINIA Bonum Creek Sep 1999 4-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 4-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin October 1999 Cumberland November 1999 Forest Heights October 1999 Kitzmiller October 1999 Upper Marlboro October 1999 NEW YORK Addison October 1999 Avoca October 1999 Bainbridge-Newton Creek October 1999 Bath--Cohocton River October 1999 Binghamton October 1999 Canisteo October 1999 Cincinnatus October 1999 Conklin-Kirkwood October 1999 Comrning-Monkey Run October 1999 Cortland October 1999 Elmira October 1999 Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal October 1999 Greene October 1999 Homrnell October 1999 Latta Brook October 1999 Lisle October 1999 Nichols October 1999 Norwich October 1999 Owego October 1999 Oxford October 1999 Painted Post October 1999 Port Dickinson October 1999 Sherbumrne October 1999 Unadilla October 1999 Whitney Point October 1999 PENNSYLVANIA Ashley October 1999 Elkland October 1999 Hanover October 1999 Kingston-Edwardsville October 1999 Lock Haven October 1999 Loyalsock October 1999 Milton October 1999 Pittston October 1999 Plymouth October 1999 Scranton October 1999 Solomon Creek October 1999 South Williamsport October 1999 Sunbury October 1999 Swoyersville-Forty Fort October 1999 Tunkhannock October 1999 Tyrone October 1999 Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. October 1999 Williamsport October 1999 VIRGINIA Bridgewater May 1999 Fourmile Run October 1999 District of Columbia & MD Projects October 1999 Anacostia River October 1999 Washington, DC & Vicinity October 1999 4-48 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-I (Continued) INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Project WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Moorefield Petersburg Ridgeley Date Inspected October 1999 October 1999 October 1999 October 1999 4-49 __ 1 NORFOLK, VA, DISTRICT * GEOGRAPHICAL LIMITS This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route. of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. TABLE OF CONTENTS IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION 1. Appomattox River, VA 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 3. AIWW Bridge, Deep Creek 4. AIW Bridge, Great Bridge 5. Back River, Poquoson 6. Bennetts Creek, VA 7. Channel to Newport News, VA 8. Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, VA 9. Chincoteague Inlet, VA 10. Guilford Creek, VA 11. Hampton Roads, VA Drift Collection 12. James River, VA 13. Jones Creek, VA 14. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 15. Nandua Creek, VA 16. Newport News Creek, VA 17. Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA 18. Oyster Channel, VA 19. Parker Creek, VA 20. Rudee Inlet, VA 21. Supervisor of Norfolk Harbor 22. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 23. Waterway on the Coast of VA 24. York River, VA 25. Work Under Continuing Authority BEACH EROSION 5-2 5-2 5-2 5-3 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-5 5-6 5-6 5-6 5-7 5-7 5-7 5-8 5-9 5-9 5-9 5-10 5-10 5-10 5-11 26. Virginia Beach Hurricane Protection 27. Virginia Beach Reimbursement 5-11 5-11 FLOOD CONTROL 28. James R. Olin Flood Control Project 5-12 29. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA 5-12 30. Richmond Filtration Plant, VA 5-12 31. Emergency Flood Control Activities 5-12 GENERAL INVESTIGATION 32. General Investigation Surveys 33. Collection and Study of Basic Data 5-12 5-13 5-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12251.) Previous projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This project provides for a channel 60 to 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 410 feet long, 80 to 140 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 2.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. City of Petersburg, VA is the local sponsor. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA, and the other is at Hopewell, VA, near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. There is also a sand and gravel loading facility at Puddledock, located about 3 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination and technical assistance to the city of Petersburg in their efforts to realign the channel away from the contaminated sediments and to secure a site for placing contaminated dredged material. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA ,between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA, 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia- North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA, and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting curtain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are non-tidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work consisted of operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies. Operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal equipment, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. performed by contract. For the A & C Canal, a contract was awarded to pave the parking area at the Great Bridge reservation. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (AIW) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DEEP CREEK, CHESAPEAKE, VA 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Location. Deep Creek, located in southeastern Virginia within the City of Chesapeake, is the northern terminus of the Dismal Swamp Canal (DSC). The DSC is a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIW) that connects the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River at Deep Creek to the Pasquotank River at South Mills, North Carolina, via Turner's Cut, covering a distance of 64.6 miles. The route of the AIW, extending from New Jersey to Florida, passes through the harbor of Baltimore, Maryland; Norfolk Harbor, Virginia; and down the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River, to the tidal river Deep Creek, a tributary to the Southern Branch, down to the Deep Creek Locks where the DSC begins. The canal is generally oriented north-south. Existing projects. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridges on the DSC - The Norfolk District operates two bridges crossing the waterway along the DSC: at Deep Creek, Virginia and South Mills, North Carolina. both are operated for the Norfolk District by a contractor. The Deep Creek Bridge, spanning the DSC, is a two-lane, single-leaf bascule bridge that was constructed in June 1934 at a cost of $64,000. When the bridge is open, there is a 60-foot horizontal channel clearance. The bridge underwent major repair in Fiscal Year 1996 to upgrade its capacity from 13 tons to 20 tons at a cost of about $271,000. This bridge is the subject of analysis for the ongoing Section 216 study. The bridge at South Mills also spans the DSC and is almost identical to the bridge at Deep Creek. Opened for traffic on 23 June 1934, it was built at the approximate cost of $67,500. As with the Deep Creek bridge, the South Mills bridge underwent major repair in Fiscal Year 1996 to upgrade its capacity from 13 tons to 20 tons at a cost of about $286,000. The State of North Carolina constructed two parallel, high level, fixed span bridges (one for northbound traffic and one for southbound traffic) about 1.5 miles north of the existing bridge. They were constructed from 1980 to 1982 at a cost of approximately $4,000,000 each. They both are about 2,100 feet long and have a roadway width of 38 feet. At the AIW itself, there is a vertical clearance of 65 feet with no horizontal restriction for vessels. Local cooperation. Complied with except that the entire project through construction will be fully Federally funded. Upon completion of the plan formulation process, the district will determine the National Economic Development (NED) plan and the Locally Preferred Plan, if any. Operations during fiscal year. The district received FY00 feasibility funds to continue the detailed investigations on the engineering, economic, environmental, cultural and real estate aspects of the project to determine if replacing the bridge is in the Federal interest. We have defined formulation and its policy framework. We began 5-3 the plan formulation process of building plans that meet the project's planning objectives while avoiding the planning constraints. The crux of our effort was to accurately define the combination of management measures that make up the plan for replacing the obsolete AIWW Bridge at Deep Creek. At this time we have conducted our formulation analysis sufficiently to allow the District's evaluation and screening of alternatives, in order to narrow down the plans to those which best meet the study objectives. Also, we are developing a Formulation Analysis Notebook that provides a description of the formulation process and methodology, and a summary of the evaluation of alternatives that were considered and screened to determine the appropriateness of moving ahead with the plan selected for detailed formulation. In this connection, we are conducting ongoing technical review to ensure the project status and compliance with the District Quality Control Plan, coordinating with the non-Federal sponsor, and working toward closure of any unresolved District-Sponsor issues or major technical or policy issues previously identified. Lastly, we are preparing the draft feasibility report. 4. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE AT GREAT BRIDGE, VA Location. The project is located in the city of Chesapeake, in the southeastern portion of VA. The city is bordered by the city of Suffolk on the west, the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth on the North, the city of Virginia Beach on the east, and North Carolina on the south. The federally owned Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway highway bridge crosses the Albermarle and Chesapeake Canal in the community of Great Bridge. Existing project. The plan of improvement includes replacement of the existing 55-year old, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2-lane swing bridge with a 5-lane, double-leaf, rolling-lift bascule bridge, 2000 LF of approach roadway, utility relocations, and removal of the existing bridge. The feasibility report was approved in Jul 94. Pre-construction engineering and design was initiated during FY 95 and completed in FY 97. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Chesapeake) is required to assume OMRR&R responsibility on project completion in accordance with the provisions described in Section 339 of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995. (P.L. 104-59) Operations during fiscal year. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 22 November 1999. Federal acquisition of real estate and rights-of-way are in progress. Contract award scheduled for 4th quarter FY 2000. Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 5. BACK RIVER, POQUOSON, VA Terminated due to lack of interest by local sponsor. 6. BENNETT'S CREEK, VA Location. Bennetts Creek is a tidal estuary of the Nansemond River wholly within the city of Suffolk, VA. It is about 3 miles in length, flows in a northern direction, and empties into the Nansemond River at its juncture with the James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 6 foot contour in the Nansemond River to the 6 foot contour within the mouth of Bennetts Creek, and extending upstream to the city boat ramp at Bennetts Creek Park, a distance of approximately 2.4 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. City of Suffolk, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. A privately owned commercial dock and berthing facility on the east side of the creek at the U.S. Route 17 bridge, and a public boat ramp and parking area at the city park, are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 7. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12245.) Existing project. A channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the project consisted of condition surveys of the channel performed during FY 1999. 8. CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, HAMPTON, VA Location. The city of Hampton is located approximately 135 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. at the junction of Hampton Roads and the Chesapeake Bay. The city is bordered by the Chesapeake Bay on the east; the Chesapeake Bay and Hampton Roads harbor on the south; the city of Newport News on the west; and York County, the city of Poquoson, and the Chesapeake Bay on the north. The city has approximately 6 miles of shoreline which fronts on the Chesapeake Bay and includes the areas of Buckroe Beach, Salt Ponds, White Marsh, Grandview, and Grandview Nature Preserve. The location and orientation of this shoreline on the western side of the southern Chesapeake Bay and immediately within the mouth of the bay have made this area susceptible to damages associated with coastal storms such as hurricanes and northeasters. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12222.) Existing Projects. There are a variety of existing coastal protection structures located along the beach within the study area including groins, seawalls, riprap, and jetties. The condition of these structures ranges from good to completely deteriorated, with ages varying from relatively new to 35 years old. In addition, the city of Hampton has conducted several beach nourishment activities in the study area to provide storm protection and to alleviate the erosion problem, primarily along the public section of Buckroe Beach. However, these projects have been small in scope, given the limited resources of the city. A reconnaissance study was initiated in 1994 under the authority of Section 114 of WRDA 92. The subsequent reconnaissance report, completed and approved in 1995, concluded that several beach nourishment plans of various heights, widths, and renourishment intervals along the public portion of Buckroe Beach are feasible. However, the study process was terminated shortly thereafter, because the plans contained long-term beach renourishment, which was against (then) new Administration policy. Subsequently, no funds were budgeted for the study in subsequent fiscal years. In Fiscal Year 1999, funds were added to the budget by Congress, thus allowing continuation of the study process into the feasibility phase. Congress again in Fiscal Year 2000 added funds. The estimated cost of this phase is $1.308 million, which is being cost shared 50-50. The study was initiated in April 1999 and is scheduled for completion 36 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 10. GUILFORD CREEK, VA Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the city of Hampton, signed the FCSA on 29 March 1999. Operations during fiscal year. The feasibility study will evaluate a variety of non-structural and structural plans of improvement for hurricane and storm damage protection for the shoreline. FY 99 funds were used to initiate the feasibility study with activities such as starting in-depth coordination with the local sponsor, gathering existing data, awarding the first of several contracts, and beginning the field work. FY 00 funds are being used to continue coordination with the local sponsor, to complete the gathering of existing data, to conduct several public meetings with property owners in the study area, to award several more contracts, to complete the field work, to conduct detailed analyses based on existing data and data acquired during the field work, to begin formulating and evaluating plans, and to begin report preparation. 9. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge the outer channel was awarded in June 1997, and completed in October 1997, with a total of 122,889 cubic yards removed. A contract to dredge the inner channel was awarded in June 1998, and the work was completed in August 1998; a total of 17,352 cubic yards was removed from the inner channel. A contract to dredge the outer channel was awarded in July 1998, and the work was completed in August 1998; a total of 72,592 cubic yards was removed from the outer channel. A contract to dredge the channel was awarded in July 1999. Other work on the project included environmental monitoring of the overboard dredged material placement site for the inner channel and condition surveys. Location. Guilford Creek is located in Accomack County, VA, near the communities of Guilford and Parksley, VA, and is a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 1.0 mile, from Beasley Bay into Guilford Creek, and including a turning basin 6 feet deep and 100 feet square. The project also includes construction of a rock groin approximately 140 feet long at the dredged material placement site. Mean range of tide is 2.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Accomack, VA, is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Work consisted of extending the groin at the dredged material placement area and planting the placement area with wetland species for environmental enhancement. 11. HAMPTON ROADS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, DC. Its principal tributaries are the James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248,12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for main-other available appropriations and that this work shall be carded on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA, and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using 5-5 months later in April 2002. Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 government plant and hired labor. 12. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows east 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock, a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels is referred to main low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 91 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Deepening the project from 25 feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. Terminal facilities. There are city-owned wharves at Richmond Harbor and at Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and numerous private facilities elsewhere on the James River. The Deepwater Terminal is at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel, and it serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coast-wide trading. For detailed information on the terminal facilities on the James River, see Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed under an Indefinite Quantities Contract to remove shoals on several areas of the James River; at Dancing Point - Swann Point Shoal Channel, at Goose Hill Channel, between Richmond Deepwater Terminal and Hopewell, at Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and at Richmond Harbor. Related work performed during the year included condition surveys, environmental and archeological studies, and engineering investigations related to shoaling, river currents and realignments at Turkey Island Cutoff, Goose Hill Channel and Tribell Shoal Channel. 13. JONES CREEK, VA Location. Jones Creek is a tributary to the Pagan River, in Isle of Wight County on the southwest shore of the James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 5,000 feet, from the Pagan River into Jones Creek and as far upstream as the State Highway Route 704 Bridge at Rescue, VA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Isle of Wight, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities at Rescue, VA are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 14. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA Location. On the south shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA, the inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of the Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in the northern half of the city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12254.) Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal, a side channel from the basin into Long Creek at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet, and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Mean range of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT winds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Virginia Beach is the local project sponsor. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to maintenance dredge the entrance channel, basin, channel to Broad Bay and the Narrows channel was awarded in September 1997, and completed in December 1997; a total of 196,146 cubic yards was removed. The entrance channel was realigned as a result of this dredging contract. 15. NANDUA CREEK, VA Location. Nandua Creek is located within the county of Accomack, VA, about ten miles south of Watts Island light, and is a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide across the bar at the mouth of the creek. Mean tide range is about 1.60 feet. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed under contract was performed during October 1998; a total of 27,398 cubic yards was removed. 16. NEWPORT NEWS CREEK, VA Location. On the southern end of the peninsula between the James and York Rivers and within the corporate limits of the city of Newport News. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12245.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and with width varying from 150 to 90 feet, from deep water in Hampton Roads to the municipal boat harbor, and including a turning and anchorage basin at the upper end of the same depth, width varying from 188 to 214 feet, and 500 feet in length. Under a Section 107 modification, a portion of the entrance channel 125 feet wide is being deepened to 18 feet, to connect with the adjacent harbor protected with an Lshaped wave screen. Portions of this harbor are also being deepened to 18 feet under Section 107 authority. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Newport News is the local project sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate, and the local sponsor is constructing a new pier to service commercial vessels. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was completed construction and project closeout activities have been initiated. 17. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA. Location. Norfolk, VA, is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD, and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see Annual Report for 1993. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTIS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGE, SEWELLS POINT: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH: The southern branch of the Elizabeth River generally oriented and flows south to north, and in the vicinity of this project is bordered on the east bank by the city of Chesapeake. The Southern Branch 40 Foot Deepening element will deepen a 2.5 mile section of the Elizabeth River from its current depth of 35 feet to 40 feet between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge at mile 15, upstream to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge (also known as Gilmerton Bridge) at mile 17.5. This reach of the channel ranges in width between 250 and 500 feet, with an average width of 300 feet. The channel will be widened at selected points to permit vessels to safely negotiate bends. At mile 17.5, in the vicinity of the Gilmerton Bridge, an 800 foot turning basin with a depth of 40 feet will be constructed. In addition, the possible need for modifying the Gilmerton Bridge will be explored as part of this project. Operations during fiscal year. Planning, engineering and design were temporarily postponed due to questions of local sponsorship. Coordination continued with the local sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of additional deepening. Anchorages: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45- acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. Operations during fiscal year. The District developed and negotiated the Project Cooperation Agreement on the proposed 50-foot anchorage improvement with the nonfederal sponsor, the Virginia Port Authority. Construction of the 50-foot anchorages was initiated in May 1999 and completed in October 1999. Disposal area: A disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; re-handling basin, approach and exit channels connecting re-handling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55- foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Operations during fiscal year. The site received 2,829,000 cubic yards in FY 1999. The maintenance storage shed was replaced in FY 1999. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 45-Ft. and 50-Ft. Channels was awarded in September 1997, and completed in April 1998; a total of 746,233 cubic yards was removed. A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 40 Ft. Channel from Lambert Bend to Paradise Creek in the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River was awarded in September 1997, and completed in December 1997; a total of 100,577 cubic yards was removed. A contract to dredge the 45-Ft. and 50-Ft. Channels was awarded in September 1998, with work continuing into FY 1999. In addition to maintenance dredging, work on the project included condition surveys and environmental studies. 18. OYSTER CHANNEL, VA Location. Oyster Channel is located in Northampton County, Virginia, at the town of Oyster, VA, and is a tributary of Liscombes Channel and Ramshorn Channel on the Virginia Eastern Shore. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12224). Existing Project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water in Liscombes Channel to and including a turning basin 6 feet deep and 1,100 feet long at Oyster, VA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The county of Northampton, VA, is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for the present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1998, and the work was completed in October 1998; a total of 45,059 cubic yards was removed. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 19. PARKER CREEK, VA Location. Parker Creek empties into the western side of Metompkin Bay in Accomack County, Virginia. It is on the ocean side of Virginia's Eastern Shore, about 20 miles south of the Maryland-Virginia state line. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12210.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide, from the junction with the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia in Metompkin Bay, extending into Parker Creek as far upstream as the 5-ft. contour. Mean range of tide is approximately 3.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The county of Accomack is the local sponsor of the project. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities, including a public dock located on the creek, are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1997, as a combined contract with the dredging of the Ramshorn Channel on the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia. Work on this contract continued into FY 1998, and was completed in February 1998, with a total of 21,649 cubic yards removed from Parker Creek. 20. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. On the Atlantic Coast of VA, within the city of Virginia Beach approximately 5 miles south of Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12205.) Existing Project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 100 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Virginia Beach as local sponsor is required to financially participate in continued annual maintenance as described in the Local Cooperation Agreement, and has fully participated through the current fiscal year. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities, are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge The entrance channel and sand trap was advertised for bids in January 1999, and bids opened during February 1999. The contract was completed in May 1999; a total of 43,823 cubic yards was removed. In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Purpose Dredge CURRITUCK was utilized to dredge the entrance channel during October 1998 and January/February 1999. 21. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12,1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the state of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409), as amended, prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken abandoned vessels. A derrick boat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 5-9 ~ Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 22. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 55 feet deep at mean low water. To date the 650-ft. wide outbound lane has been deepened and maintained to a depth of 50 feet, and the remaining 350-ft. width is maintained at a 45-ft. depth under the previous project. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For the most recent improvements to the channel (50-ft. depth over 650-ft. wide outbound lane), the Virginia Port Authority was project sponsor and shared in the cost of the improvement. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations During Fiscal Year. Work consisted of condition surveys of the channel and monitoring of the Dam Neck Ocean Dredged Material Management Site as required by the EPA. Additionally, plans and specifications were prepared, and a contract was advertised in August 1999 and awarded in September 1999; dredging is scheduled to be performed during fiscal year 2000. 23. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12210, 12211, and 12221.) Existing projects. An island waterway 6 feet at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 170 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. A dredging contract was awarded in FY 1999 to dredge shoals in Magothy Bay (53,666 CY pay yardage and 67,716 CY total yardage) and Metompkin Bay (83,429 CY pay yardage and 108,387 CY total yardage). Other project costs for FY 1999 included engineering and design for current and out-year dredging contracts, environmental operations, and project condition surveys. 24. YORK RIVER, VA Location. This river is formed at West Point, VA, by the confluence of the Mattaponi and Pamnukey Rivers, and flows southeasterly about 41 miles into the Chesapeake Bay, which it enters about 20 miles in a northerly direction from Norfolk, VA, and 20 miles in a northwesterly direction from the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12238 and 12243.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 22 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide through the bars, and a basin of the same depth at the wharves at West Point, and the construction of a dike on the right bank at West Point to assist in maintaining the channel. Also provides for dredging a channel 37 feet deep at mean lower low water and 750 feet wide from the 38 foot contour in the Chesapeake Bay to a point adjacent to the piers at the Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, approximately 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.2 feet at the mouth and 2.9 feet at West Point. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Virginia Port Authority was project sponsor and shared in the cost of the improvement to the Entrance Channel. Terminal facilities. The facilities are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work; a contract to dredge the entrance channel was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company in June 1998. Dredging was initiated in August 1998 and completed in August 1999; a total of 1,270,408 cubic yards was removed. See Annual Report for FY 1998 for the last complete report on the York River Project. 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 25. WORK UNDER CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROGRAM The district continues work on six Section 107 (navigation) studies: York River Entrance Channel, VA, has completed construction and project close-out activities have been initiated; Newport News Creek, VA, has completed construction and project close-out activities have been initiated; Guilford Creek, VA, has completed construction and project close-out activities have been initiated; Messick Point, Back River, VA, continuing the Plans & Spec (P&S) phase, Starlings Creek, VA continuing the feasibility phase; Nassawaddox Creek, VA, initiating the feasibility phase. In addition, the district continues work on one Section 205 (Small Flood Control) study, Jamestown Island, VA, initiating the feasibility phase. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 26. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The plan of improvement includes construction of a vertical steel sheet-pile wall with concrete cap extending from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street (about 4 miles), enhancement of the existing dune system between 58th Street and 89th Street (about 2 miles), construction and periodic renourishment of a widened and raised beach berm between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street (about 6.2 miles), a new boardwalk integrated with the vertical wall which will be placed seaward of the existing boardwalk extending from Rudee Inlet to approximately 40th Street (about 3 miles), a storm water runoff system consisting of the offshore discharge by pumped flow through submarine pipelines, appropriate beach access structures consisting of ramps and stairs and dune crossover facilities. Periodic beach nourishment will maintain the beach and dune system over the 50 year project life. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1996 and the first construction contract was underway in October, 1996. Initial construction of the project is scheduled for completion in September 2001. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Virginia Beach) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in The Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. The project was in continuing construction: A 4,400 LF segment of seawall and interior drainage improvements between 27 th and 40 th Streets was turned over to the local sponsor in May, 1999. One additional contract was awarded and under construction during the year. This contract includes the seawall/boardwalk and interior drainage improvements (7,300 LF) between 8th and 27 th Streets. Construction of the 16 th Street and 42 n d street pump stations and ocean outfall systems continued during the year. Plans and specifications were also being prepared for the remaining beach berm and dune improvements. 27. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, (REIMBURSEMENT) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The periodic nourishment program is a modification of the original project adopted by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, which provided for beach restoration and the deferred construction of a system of groins. Comparative cost studies of groin construction versus periodic nourishment indicate that the later is the more suitable and economical method for maintaining share stability, protecting property, and insuring maximum recreation benefits from use of the publicly-owned shores. The current project includes periodic nourishment of approximately 3.3 miles of beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street with maintenance of the berm to a minimum width of approximately 100 feet of elevation 7 feet above mean low water. Federal participation began in 1962. In accordance with Sec 355 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, federal participation shall extend until the earlier of: (1) the year 2012; or (2) Completion of the project for beach erosion control and hurricane projection, Virginia Beach, VA. Local cooperation. The city of Virginia Beach provides annual engineering and contracting services for the truck haul and placement of 150,000 cubic yards of beach fill. The city directs sand placement in the most eroded areas of the beach with oversight and verification by the Norfolk District. Upon conclusion of each year of nourishment, a government audit is performed and the city is reimbursed for the federal share of eligible contract hauling and engineering costs. Operations during fiscal year. The federal share (65%) of the 1999 re-nourishment cost was reimbursed to the city of Virginia Beach. The federal share totaled $778,270. 5-11 __ ___ Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 28. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA. Location. The city of Buena Vista is on the left bank of the Maury River, 40 miles below the rivers origin and about 11 miles upstream of its juncture with the main stem of the James River at the community of Glasgow. The Maury River Basin above Buena Vista contains a drainage area of about 840 square miles. Existing projects. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on the left bank and channel modifications to provide flood protection against a flood equal to the August 1969, event which is the maximum flood of recent record. The programmed portion of the project (lower element) consists of a combination levee/floodwall with controlled channelized flow of interior drainage and channel refinement to the Maury River. The unprogrammed portion of the project (upper element) consists of a concrete ringwall around the Georgia Bonded Fibers plant. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Buena Vista) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for project construction, and maintain and operate all works after completion. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the programmed portion of the project was executed on February 17, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The programmed lower element was constructed in two phases; Phase I consists of channel refinements to the Maury River; Phase 11 consists of the levee, floodwall, closures and interior drainage canal. Construction for Phase I and Phase II is 100 percent complete. 29. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Allegheny County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA. At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation poot elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. A contract to replace the security system was awarded in FY 1999. 30. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA Location: The Richmond Water Filtration Plant is located in the city of Richmond, VA, bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. Existing project: As a result of Tropical Storm Agnes in June 1972, the water filtration plant was flooded and the estimated 400,000 population served was without potable water supply for over five days and without fire protection for over three days. The project will provide flood protection of the municipal water supply treatment plant from a flood having a recurrence of 360 years. The project will provide flood protection by enclosing three sides of the water filtration plant with a floodwall and tying into high ground. The wall will have an average height of about nine feet with a top elevation of 117 feet MSL. The project will be built through one contract over two years. Local cooperation: The city of Richmond, VA is the local sponsor; a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on October 21, 1994. Operation during the fiscal year: In FY 99, this project was completed 31. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 99, a total of $77,879 was spent on Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program (Approp. 96X3123), and $354,879 on Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies including Emergency Operations (Approp. 96X3125). 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT GENERAL INVESTIGATION 32. GENERAL INVESTIGATION SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $1,998,944. The work consisted of a shoreline protection study of Hampton $121,012; special studies $1,486,082; Interagency Water Resources Development $30,610; National Marine Fisheries Service $2,666; coordination with other agencies and cooperation with states $45,312; and review of the AIWW Bridge Replacement at Deep Creek, VA $13,267. 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year 99, cost of collection and study of basic data was $192,000 consisting of flood plain management studies including Quick Responses, Management Service Unit, Technical Services and Environmental Data Studies and special studies. 5-13 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin-Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ...................................... 6-2 (R & H Act of 1965) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla, (Wilmington District).....................6-2 3. Avon Harbor, N.C............................................6-4 4. Beaufort Harbor, N.C.......................................6-4 5. Cape Fear River, N.C. Above Wilmington.......6-4 6. Drum Inlet, N.C .............................................. 6-5 7. Far Creek, N.C.................................................6-5 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C...........................6-5 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C.......................6-6 10. Morehead City Harbor, N.C ........................... 6-7 11. Neuse River, N.C ............................................ 6-8 12. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C...........................6-8 13. Roanoke River, N.C.........................................6-8 14. Rollinson Channel, N.C...................................6-9 15. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C..................................6-9 16. Stumpy Point Bay, N.C ................................. 6-9 17. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C................................6-9 18. Wilmington Harbor, N.C .............................. 6-10 Flood Control 19. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C ......................... 6-11 19-A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C...........6-12 20. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C................6-12 21. Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, Clinton, N.C.... ....................... ..... 6-13 22. Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), Va. ... ......................... 6-13 23. Hamlet City Lake, N.C................................6-14 24. Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N.C..............6-14 25. Neuse River Basin, N.C.................................6-15 25-A. Falls Lake, N.C..............................................6-15 26. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va .- Headwaters Area ................................... 6-15 27. Wrightsville Beach, N.C................................6-16 28. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C ............... 6-16 28-A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C .............................................. 6-16 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...................................6-17 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.....................................6-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 31. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C .............. 6-17 31-A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N .C . ............................................ 6-17 31-B. Philpott Lake, Va .......................................... 6-18 32. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ..................................... 6-18 Miscellaneous 33. Cape Fear River L & D No.1 Fish Ladder, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) ....................................... 6-20 34. Sea Turtle Habitat Restoration, Long Beach, N.C (CAP Section 1135)...........6-20 35. Battery Island Bird Habitat Preservation NC (CAP Section 204).........................................6-21 General Investigations 36. Surveys...........................................................6-21 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 6-21 38. Preconstruction Engineering and D esign ..................................................... 6-21 Tables Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement ............... 6-22 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation........................6-28 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects...............................6-31 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................... 6-32 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................................ 6-33 Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects...........................6-34 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................................ 6-35 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization............................6-35 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs............................6-36 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization............................6-37 6-1 Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251,89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Congr., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: No operations in FY 99 and no new areas were added to the program in FY 99. $2,991 accrued cost for prior year Aquatic Plant Control Program activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The State has kept alligatorweed treatment sites under maintenance control in FY 99. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA.,AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwater intrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small- Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harboraccess channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Gene A. Potter (formerly Hobucken), and Fairfield Bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $70,200,000 (1999). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93- 251. The 12-foot-deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel modification to New 6-2 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT River was deauthorized January 1, 1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall. The training wall has an estimated Federal cost of $3,470,000 (1992). The wall was reclassified to the "inactive" category on August 14,1992. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non- Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of Fairfield Bridge continued at a cost of $5,039,251. Costs in connection with close-out of the completed Gene A. Potter Bridge (Hobucken), including wetlands mitigation and real estate activities were $111,431. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $215,500. Between February 10 and April 4, 1999, the contract dredge Hampton Roads dredged 264,953 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel and constructed dikes at a cost of $1,673,916. Between October 1, 1998 and July 22, 1999, the contract dredges Cherokee, Blue Ridge dredged 348,439 cubic yards from shoals at the inlet crossings at a cost of $2,034,387. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 112,715 cubic yards from shoals at the Carolina Beach Inlet crossing at a cost of $1. Cost adjustment in connection with prior year maintenance dredging of the through channel was a negative $9,745. Cost adjustment for prior year dredging at inlet crossings resulted in a negative cost of $3,280. Engineering and design for future years dredging for the through channel cost $44,075 and for the inlet crossings cost $28,438. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $165,028. Real estate support for easements and audit cost $35,554. Long-term environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $11,618. Periodic inspections of Fairfield Bridge cost $6,951. One highway bridge was operated and maintained at a cost of $211,407. Updating the Colonial Nesting Waterbirds inventory database cost $10,000. Encroachment and boundary surveys at Snows Cut cost $9,668. Chain link fencing at Snows Cut cost $24,848. An Initial Appraisal for review of the completed project at Snows Cut cost $18,067. Encroachment and boundary surveys for the Core Creek Land Cut cost $95,435. Sediment sampling and analysis in New Hanover and Pender counties cost $44,000. Dredged material management plan cost $39,188. Dredged material facility surveys and maintenance cost $1,000. Condition and operations studies cost $255,397. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 274,360 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $523,400. Between September 29 and September 30, 1999, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 7,000 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $18,000. On April 20, 1999 the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired mooring facilities at a cost of $6,000. Condition and operation studies cost $22,659. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 159,425 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $482,400. During intermittent periods the sidecasting dredge Fry removed 112,715 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $351,000. Construction of a mooring facility for government plant cost $116,999. Condition and operation studies cost $18,233. Masonboro Inlet - Environmental studies and monitoring activities cost $10,385. Condition and operation studies cost $3,200. Project condition surveys cost $2,400. New River Inlet - Between January 26, and April 4, 1999 the contract dredges Richmond, Marion removed 67,538 cubic yards from Channel to Jacksonville at a cost of $374,141. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 230,064 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $336,000. Between April 17 and May 9, 1999, the sidecasting dredge Meritt removed 77,660 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $198,000 Condition and operation studies cost $15,547. New Topsail Inlet - Between January 3 and February 25, 1999 the contract dredge Marion removed 78,006 cubic yards from Topsail Creek crossing at a cost of $357,109. Between October 15 and October 16, 1999, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 4,200 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $6,000. During intermittent periods the sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 50,940 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $180,000. On October 1, 1998 and April 22, 1999 the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired mooring facilities at a cost of $24,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 64,145 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $259,700. Condition and operation studies and project operation management plan cost $30,849. 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1997 except for three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the replacement of Fairfield Bridge. The construction contract for Fairfield Bridge was awarded December 22, 1997 with completion scheduled for March 2001. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1999, was $266,879,604, of which $80,590,854 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $186,288,750 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 3. AVON HARBOR, N.C. Location. The project is located on the east coast of North Carolina, 9 miles north of Cape Hatteras. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a direct channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 3.5 miles long from the depth in Pamlico Sound southeast to a basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long at Avon. Plane of reference is mean low water. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound due to winds, seldom range as much as 2 feet above or below mean stage; however, severe windstorms will double or triple that variation. The original project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 316, 76th Cong., 1st sess.) and modification for direct channel authorized May 5, 1965, under Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the basin at Avon, with a total frontage of about 300 feet. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 2 and May 4, 1999 the contract dredge Richmond removed 114,366 cubic yards from shoals at Avon at a cost of $1,215,871. Contributed funds of $119,416 were expended on dikes for pipeline dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) 4. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between April 11 and April 18, 1999, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 36,130 cubic yards from shoals in Bulkhead Channel and Morgan Creek Channel at a cost of $342,980. Project condition surveys cost $4,627. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1999, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $4,700,982 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $5,528,022. 5. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 6-4 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods, the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations at a cost of $144,000 and using its bucket removed a small shoal at Lock and Dam No. 1 at a cost of $60,000. Between February 20 and February 28, 1999 the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 38,170 cubic yards from shoals in the navigation channel at a cost of $64,975. Cost adjustment for prior year repair and rehabilitation of recreation facilities at the three locks and dams resulted in a negative cost of $750. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $288,535. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1999, was $26,608,863 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $22,998,409 for maintenance. 6. DRUM INLET, N.C. Location. Drum Inlet is an opening through the barrier beach which separates Core Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. It is about 1,100 feet wide and is about 35 miles northeast of Beaufort and opposite the village of Atlantic. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1233 and 419.) Existing project. The project provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from the gorge in the inlet to the federally improved channel in Core Sound, about 1 mile. The mean range tide is 3.8 feet in the ocean and 0.3 foot in Core Sound at Atlantic. The project also provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the gorge in the inlet to deep water in the Atlantic Ocean. The Core Sound portion of the project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938. (H.D. 414, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.) The channel from the inlet to the Atlantic Ocean was authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Piping plover monitoring at Drum Inlet cost $10,417. Cost adjustment for prior year condition and operation studies resulted in a negative cost of $80. Project condition surveys cost $3,905. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in February 1972. The Limited Reevaluation Report was completed in September 1994. It determined that resumption of Federal maintenance is economically justified and is environmentally acceptable. Pipeline dredging was completed in March 1997. 7. FAR CREEK, N.C. Location. Flows easterly from Engelhard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Engelhard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 9 and December 28, 1998 the contract dredge Richmond removed 244,042 cubic yards from shoals in Far Creek at a cost of $494,148. Disposal area inspection and survey at a contributed funds cost of $11,181. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 8. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allo- 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 cated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in ground water levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 4 and March 14, 1999, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 23,690 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $79,700. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 240,800 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $198,000. Between July 19 and August 11, 1999, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 61,100 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $153,000. Condition and operation studies cost $11,278. Adjustment in prior year cost for preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment resulted in a negative cost of $195. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 9. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $86,582,000 (1999). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25,1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) perform, or, cause to be performed, any investigation for hazardous substances as are determined necessary to identify the existence and extent of any hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA and assume complete financial responsibility, as between the Federal government and the non-Federal sponsor, for all necessary clean up and response costs; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $9,614,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations (except utility relocations), presently estimated at $9,545,000. Reasonable assurances have been 6-6 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on the economic update, GDM supplement, and EIS supplement at a cost of $90,652. Cost adjustment for prior year work on the sand bypassing and fishery management plan resulted in a negative cost of $2,800. Maintenance: Between November 25, 1998 and March 25, 1999, the contract dredge Richmond dredged 196,000 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese at a cost of $1,061,860. Between October 1 and October 27, 1998, the contract dredge M. V Atchafalaya dredged 180,183 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar and vicinity of the bridge at a cost of $227,699. Between July 9 and September 30, 1999, the contract dredge Mermentau dredged 155,188 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $677,189. Cost in connection with prior year contract dredging of the ocean bar was $1,031. The U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed from Oregon Inlet 226,060 cubic yards between October 1, 1998 and February 28, 1999 and 37,954 cubic yards between July 30 and August 13, 1999 at a cost of $594,100. The U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed from Oregon Inlet 66,750 cubic yards between January 20 and February 11, 1999 and 155,440 cubic yards between August 20 and September 30, 1999 at a cost of $398,775. The sidecasting dredge U.S. Merritt removed 124,390 cubic yards between June 10 and July 18, 1999 and 31,490 cubic yards between September 14 and September 28, 1999 from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $405,000. Engineering and design and surveys in connection with future years dredging of Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese cost $28,855. Project monitoring cost $23,315. Monitoring environmental impact of placing dredge material near shore in the Pea Island Refuge cost $51,646. National Ocean Survey tidal datum determination cost $5,604. Construction of oyster reefs for mitigation was completed at a cost of $3,000. Condition and operation studies and project operations management cost $98,260. Island H disposal area repairs at a contributed funds cost of $15,625. Shoreline monitoring at Oregon Inlet was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $40,945. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further detail, see Annual Report of 1962.) 10. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. A channel 47 feet deep and 450 feet wide from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar at Beaufort Inlet with three wideners; a cutoff channel 400 feet wide; and a depth of 45 feet in the east leg of the basin, including a 1,350 foot diameter turning area; a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the turning basin to Sixth Street, Morehead City, then 12 feet deep, 200 to 400 feet wide to Tenth Street; then 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, to Bogue Sound. Project also includes assumption of maintenance in the northwest leg and the east leg extension. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.), the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between November 26, 1998 and March 9, 1999, the contract dredges Sugar Island, Northerly Island, Manhattan Island, and Dodge Island dredged 1,040,919 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $2,904,358. Between April 11 and May 16, 1999, the contract dredges Pullen, Hampton Roads removed 350,042 cubic yards from shoals in the inner harbor at a cost of $1,742,518. Cost in connection with prior year dredging of the ocean bar was $20. Benthic sampling cost $32,747. The sea turtle environmental study cost $722. The national ocean survey tidal datum determination cost $2,612. Project monitoring of impacts on Bogue Banks and Shackleford Banks cost $14,040. Condition and operation studies and project operation management cost $159,204. Between June 15 and June 18, 1999, the contract dredges Pullen, Hampton Roads removed 8,046 cubic yards from shoals at Berth 1 for the State Ports Authority at a contributed funds cost of $28,966. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete with the latest modification being physically complete in April 1994. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999, was $93,783,719 of which $15,892,219 was for new work, including $2,731,996 contributed funds (including $553,477 public works funds) and $77,891,500 for maintenance, including $1,827,294 contributed funds. 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 11. NEUSE RIVER, N. C. Location. Neuse River rises in the north central part of North Carolina near Raleigh, flows generally southeasterly to a point 30 miles below New Bern where it empties into Pamlico Sound. Total length about 350 miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 538 and 1231.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 300 feet wide and 12 feet deep at mean low water from a point 10 miles below, up to, and in front of New Bern; thence 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep, from the railroad bridge at New Bern to a point about 3 miles upstream; a channel 4 feet deep at dead low water to Kinston; and, during 9 months of the year, 3 feet deep at dead low water to Smithfield, to be obtained by dredging and snagging. The section included in the project is about 160 miles long. Estimated cost of new work is $488,200 (1964). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878; June 13, 1902; January 21, 1927; and two modifications, one providing for a channel 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep was authorized October 15, 1965 and the other providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the highway bridge across the mouth of Dawson Creek to deep water in the Neuse River was authorized August 4, 1969, both under authority of Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. The 300-foot wide channel in front of New Bern was deauthorized August 5, 1977. Local cooperation. For the Section 107 modification, local interests musts provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project; continue to provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including a public landing, with suitable supply facilities, open to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the creek by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are thirty wharves on this stream, of which two are below New Bern, sixteen at or near New Bern, three at Bridgeton, and nine above New Bern. Total frontage is 2,900 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost adjustment for prior year preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment resulted in a negative cost of $1,160. Project condition surveys cost $1,469. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1971. (For further details, see Annual report for 1950.) 12. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N.C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25, 1912; July 3, 1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in useable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $633. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 13. ROANOKE RIVER, N. C. Location. Rises in Blue Ridge Mountains, west of Roanoke, Va., flows southeasterly about 398 miles, and empties into westerly end of Albemarle Sound, N.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1228 and Post Route Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Albemarle Sound to 1 mile above Plymouth, N.C. thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Hamilton; and thence a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide to Palmyra Landing. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1871; July 3, 1930; and June 20, 1938. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty-two waterfront facilities serve the waterway. Facilities appear adequate for existing commerce. 6-8 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $371. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 14. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30,1935; March 2,1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 63,750 cubic yards between March 24 and April 16, 1999 and 35,560 cubic yards between September 4 and September 13, 1999 from shoals in Rollinson Channel at a cost of $270,000. Between September 11 and September 24, 1999, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Currituck removed 5,030 cubic yards from shoals in Rollinson Channel at a cost of $34,050. An Environmental Assessment for future maintenance dredging cost $3,348. Digital orthophotos mapping cost $13,006. Project operation management cost $1,317. Project condition surveys cost $21,368. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 15. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet, a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Digital orthophotos mapping cost $12,969. Project condition surveys cost $18,720. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 16. STUMPY POINT BAY, N. C. Location. On southeastern side of the mainland, Dare County, N.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229). Existing project. A channel 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Pamlico Sound to a basin in the harbor at Lake Work, 75 to 100 feet wide, 550 feet long and 10 feet deep, plus and irregularly shaped area providing access to the public wharf, together with protective breakwaters at entrance to the harbor. Project was authorized by 1948 River and Harbor Act and under Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bulkheads in existing basin provide about 550 linear feet of berthing space, and a wholesale fishhouse provides about 250 feet. Part of the space along the bulkheads is publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, but any appreciable increase will require additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Disposal area dike repairs at a contributed funds cost of $13,791. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed on September 20, 1967. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966). 17. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs in connection with FY 2000 dredging of shoals in the Atlantic Harbor of Refuge by the contract dredge Miss Margaret were $43,879. Cost adjustment for sturgeon survey of major drainage areas resulted in a negative cost of $10,000. Project condition surveys cost $1,302. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 18. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized and constructed project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-foot deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; and under the continuing authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Three modifications to the project were authorized by the Water Resources Development Acts of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) and October 12, 1996 (PL104-303). These three modifications were subsequently combined into one project modification by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for FY 98. The project consists of two separable elements, the portion for deepening of the existing project and the portion for raising the dikes on Eagle Island dredged material disposal facility (DMDF) for maintenance of the existing project until the deepening is completed. The plan of improvement consists of deepening the ocean bar and entrance channels from the authorized depth of 40 feet to 44 feet; deepening the authorized 38-foot project to 42 feet up to and including the anchorage basin immediately upriver from the State Ports Authority dock, and extending the anchorage basin northward by 300 feet; widening the existing 400-foot wide channel to 600 feet over a total length of 6.2 miles including Lower and Upper Midnight and Lower Lilliput reaches; widen five turns and bends by 100 to 200 feet providing a total average channel width of 500 to 675 feet; widening the Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet over a total length of 1.5 miles; deepening the 32-foot channel between Castle Street and the Hilton Railroad Bridge, the 32-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear river on the west side, and the 25-foot channel from the Hilton Railroad Bridge to 750 feet upstream all to a depth of 38 feet; deepening the 25-foot channel from 750 feet upstream of the Hilton Railroad Bridge to the turning basin near the upstream limits of the project to 34 feet, along with widening of the channel from 200 to 250 feet; and widening the turning basin from 700 to 800 feet; mitigation to include acquiring, by fee title, 30 acres of upland and construction of an embayment and acquisition of about 500 acres of existing marsh and upland areas for preservation of habitat to offset losses of wetlands and primary nursery areas. The plan of improvement for the dredged material disposal facility consists of incrementally raising the dikes of three cells on Eagle Island confined disposal facility from their current elevations to an ultimate elevation of 40 feet. The environmental enhancement portion of the project is unprogrammed. The estimated Federal cost is $215,678,000 (1999) for the deepening project separable element and $34,100,000 6-10 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT (1999) for the dredged material disposal facility separable element. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. Cost-sharing and financing are in accordance with concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. For the deepening project separable element the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal area lands presently estimated at $1,915,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs presently estimated at $6,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $19,595,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $71,600,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction which is partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $27,000,000: and (4) provide and maintain, at its own expense, the local service facilities necessary to realize the benefits of the general navigation features, presently estimated at $23,212,000. For the dredged material disposal facility separable element the non-Federal sponsor must (1) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $11,300,000; and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction, presently estimated at $4,540,000. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Cost adjustment in connection with termination of the project to deepen the ocean bar resulted in a Federal cost of $127,066 and a contributed funds cost decrease of $143,485. Engineering and design and construction management costs in connection with the harbor deepening project cost $7,656,540. The south cell dike raise on Eagle Island in connection with the 38 foot project was completed at a contributed funds cost of $124,918. These funds were accepted under an advanced funds agreement with the State. Disposal area construction in connection with the harbor deepening project cost $1,129,189 in contributed funds. Maintenance: Between January 11 and February 26, 1999, the contract dredge Sugar Island dredged 683,263 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,738,744. Between October 1, 1998 and January 24, 1999 the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 688,336 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and river channel at a Federal cost of $1,198,797 and 96,156 cubic yards from shoals at the State Port at a contributed funds cost of $246,619. Between September 18 and September 30, 1998 the contract dredge Arlington dredged 33,232 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and river channel at a cost of $679,504. Disposal Island 10 was repaired at a contributed funds cost of $301,300. Dike repairs in connection with the ditching of the Eagle Island north cell was completed at a contributed funds cost of $268,652. Cost adjustment in connection with final accounting for prior year dredging from Smith Island Channel deposited on the beach at Bald Head Island under Section 933 resulted in a Federal cost decrease of $78,707 and a contributed funds cost of $78,707. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $72,000. Cost in connection with prior year dredging shoals in the ocean bar cost $55. A cost adjustment for prior year dredging by the U.S. or hopper dredge McFarland from shoals in the river channel resulted in a cost decrease of $119,285. Engineering and design for future years dredging of the ocean bar cost $14,971. Engineering and design to prepare an Environmental Assessment for beach disposal of material from the Connecting Channel Cape Fear River to Snows Cut cost $6,810. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $124,071. Sea turtle research project cost $1,395. A cost adjustment for archaeological investigation in connection with the wood debris investigation and removal resulted a negative cost of $61. Long term project management plan cost $1,491. Condition and operation studies and project operation management cost $290,988. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed August 1997 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1999, was $185,144,980 of which $54,951,199 was for new work, including $11,549,612 contributed funds and $130,193,781 was for maintenance, including $10,320,914 contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. A new construction start for the latest modification was received in FY98, with the disposal area construction contract awarded May 1999 and completed October 1999 and the mitigation contract awarded August 1999. Flood Control 19. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87- 639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was deauthorized in July 1995 due to the current lack of economic justification. Randleman Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in April 1992 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 19A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N.C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acrefeet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $147,600,000 (1996), consisting of $89,186,000 for construction, and $58,414,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30,1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $44,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed by ASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Mason House rehabilitation completed at a cost of $159,917. Total Federal expenditures were $227,109, including the above item. Maintenance: Adjustments in the cost of paving at Poe's Ridge resulted in a negative cost of $7,672. Sedimentation surveys cost $2,276. Adjustments in the cost of Hurricane Fran clean up and repairs resulted in a negative cost of $19. Correction of erosion problems at gate 11 cost $87,459. Engineering and Design for the management center addition cost $19,507. Construction of a handicap fishing pier at Bells Church cost $17,364. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,080,142. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are complete. Impoundment was completed in February 1982, with dedication on May 1, 1982. The project was completed in June 1999. The master plan update and boater use study are scheduled to be completed September 2000. 20. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of two separable elements, the Carolina Beach Portion and Area South of Carolina Beach and provides for construction of a dune with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 13.5 feet National geodetic vertical datum (NGVD), a berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD for Carolina Beach and 9 feet NGVD for the Area South, a rock revetment at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD along the northern 2,050 feet fronted by a 130-foot wide berm at elevation 6.5 feet NGVD, extending about 32,000 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 50 years from year of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for area south new work is $157,300,000 (1999). The project was 6-12 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project. For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; (f) assure the continued public ownership of the above shore and its administration for public use during the 50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs associated with future year renourishment of the Carolina Beach portion were $7,020. Construction of the Area South portion of the project was completed at a Federal cost of $254,691 and a contributed funds cost of $62,607. Cost adjustments for prior year renourishment of the Carolina Beach portion resulted in a Federal cost of $22,281 and a contributed funds cost decrease of $16,426. Future borrow sources investigations cost $4,240. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction for the Carolina Beach portion was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The latest increment of re-nourishment for the Carolina Beach portion was completed in April 1998 with the next increment scheduled for FY 2001. The contract for the initial re-nourishment of the Area South portion was awarded August 1996 with dredging completed in January 1998. and final contract completion December 1999. 21. CLINTON WASTEWATER TREATMENTPLANT, CLINTON, N.C. Location. The project is located at the confluence of Dollar Branch and Williams Old Mill Branch near the City of Clinton, about 60 miles south of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing Project. The project consists of construction of a dike approximately 2,200 feet long around the Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, with sumps and pumps to provide interior drainage. Loss of 1.8 acres of wetlands due to construction will be mitigated by purchase of a 4 acre mitigation site and by the Sponsor placing a restrictive covenant to preserve 6 acres of land already owned. The project provides protection from a 100 year flood event. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $591,000 (1998). The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 7, 1998, under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent, no greater than 50 percent, of total project costs, estimated at $197,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $5,000,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year New Work: Complete coordination with Sponsor on real estate acquisition and initiate construction at a Federal cost of $76,768 and a contributed funds cost of $41,527. Condition at end of fiscal year Real estate acquisition by the Sponsor is complete. The construction contract was awarded July 13, 1999 and is scheduled to be substantially complete in June 2000 22. Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), VA. Location. The project area is located in the City of Danville in Pittsylvania County in south-central Virginia, 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 approximately 50 miles northeast of Greensboro, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Ringgold, Va. - N.C.) Existing project. The project will consist of a dike system around approximately one quarter of the Southside Sewage Treatment Plant. The dike will be constructed at an elevation equivalent to 3 feet above the 100-year frequency flood. This project will protect the control buildings which house electrical motors and pumps for the Treatment Plant. The utility road located to the back of the control building and the existing dike will be raised to the designed elevation while a completely new dike section will be constructed connecting the existing dike and the entrance road at the designated elevation. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $192,000 (1997). The project was approved on July 11, 1995, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, total project costs, estimated at $64,000; provide a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; provide all lands, easements, rights-of way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Government to be necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; shall provide or pay to the Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins, that may be required at any dredged material disposal area necessary for the construction of the project; shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined necessary for construction of the project; shall hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project and any project-related betterments, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government and its contractors; and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Cost in connection with project completion was $4,596 Federal and $484 in contributed funds cost. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded November 20, 1996 and was substantially complete in June 1997. The project was accepted by the sponsor in October 1998 for operation and maintenance. 23. HAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in the 1930's under the WPA Program impounds the shallow 50-acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties into the lake and has contributed significantly to a sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of accumulated sediment and debris including construction of sediment traps and providing other devices or equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing program show that contaminants are much more widespread than originally estimated. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,725,000 (1997). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Sec. 206, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 percent of the total cost of the project estimated at $925,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction was completed at a Federal cost of $82,683 and a contributed funds cost of $19,868. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded November 21, 1997 and was substantially complete May 1998. Project completion was May 1999. 24. MORAVIAN CREEK, WILKESBORO, N.C. Location. The project is located along 440 meters of Moravian Creek in the Town of Wilkesboro, Wilkes County, in western North Carolina. Existing Project. The project consists of a concrete flood barrier approximately 200 meters long and up to 6 feet high, bank protection, clearing and snagging of the stream, grading and grassing of banks, and planting of native trees and shrubs. The project provides protection from a 15-year flood event of commercial structures. During design a second concrete barrier approximately 95 meters long and 6 to 18 inches high was determined necessary to provide the 15-year protection. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $576,000 (1998). The project was approved by the Division commander on September 30, 1998, under Section 205 of the Flood control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, and amount equal to not less than 25 percent, but not greater than 50 percent, of total project costs, estimated at $192,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate. 6-14 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year New Work: Coordination with the Sponsor on real estate acquisition cost $15,425. Condition at end of fiscal year The project was approved for construction September 30, 1998. The PCA was executed December 1998 and acquisition of real estate by the Sponsor is underway. Construction contract award is scheduled for FY 2000. 25. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 25A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $183,000,000 (1996) consisting of $91,334,000 for construction and $91,666,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,637,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $116,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $21,595,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,544,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with PL 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of PL 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract payments for work completed on the wildlife sub-impoundments in FY 98 cost $330,979. Work continued on Holly Point Recreation Area improvements at a cost of $261,185 and on real estate activities at a cost of $104,773. Total Federal expenditures were $883,872, including the above items. Maintenance: Periodic inspections were accomplished at a cost of $2,564. Debris removal and repairs in connection with Hurricane Fran cost $11,275. Replacement of the Indication and Control System cost $7,500. Normal operation and maintenance cost $963,749. Condition at tend of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. All facilities are basically complete except for minor modifications for recreational areas. Project completion is scheduled for March 2000. The master plan update and boater use study are scheduled for completion in September 2000. 26. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, Va. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Roanoke, Va.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 6.2 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, Va. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 streamflow. Other flood damage reduction features include floodproofing at two locations, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 6,120 feet), replacement of two lowlevel bridges which constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 2.9-mile recreation trail along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $29,700,000 (1999). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $8,963,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $3,102,000; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $10,000; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations presently estimated at $2,033,500, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $101,000, annually; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $1,124,500, (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $9,000, annually; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) presently estimated at $367,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design continued at a cost of $539,504. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the flood warning system was completed in January 1991. The contract for the sewage treatment plant floodproofing was awarded in August 1991 and completed in February 1993. Two hazardous material sites have been cleared by the owners. Sponsor initiated land acquisition for channel improvement in FY98. Low water bridged will be constructed at owners expense channel/floodwall construction contract scheduled for award FY2001 Project completion is scheduled for September 2008. 27. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p.834) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for the life of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Future borrow site investigations cost $11,639. Work in connection with future year beach renourishment cost $38,693 Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the initial authorization has been completed. Under WRDA 86 the third renourishment was completed in May 1998. The next renourishment is scheduled for 2002. 28. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 28A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diam- 6-16 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT eter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sewer line construction cost $36,018. Engineering and design for the management center exhibits cost $45,664. Replacement of the Indication and Control System cost $7,782. Construction of 2 comfort stations and roof replacement at Warriors Creek cost $4,889. Periodic inspections cost $46,501. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,371,824. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, review and inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1999: Ararat River, Surry County, N.C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N.C.; Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N.C.; Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), Va.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C.; Gapway Swamp, N.C. & S.C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N.C.; Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N.C. (Sec 14); King (Water Plant), NC (Sec 14); Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C.; N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C. (Sec 14); Neuse River, Oriental, N.C. (Hodges Street Bulkhead) (Sec 14); New River, Onslow County, N.C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N.C.; Oriental, South Avenue, N.C. (Sec 14); Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N.C.; Pungo Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Pungo River, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va. - Headwaters Area (Floodproofing Of Roanoke Sewage Treatment Plant); Simmons Bay Creek, Columbus County, N.C.; South Creek, Beaufort, N.C.; South Mayo River, Patrick County, Va.; Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C.; Tar River, Princeville, N.C.; Wrightsville Beach, N.C; and White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $6,930. Total cost to September 30, 1999, was $548,268, charged to operations. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program cost $20,085. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $224,478. Non-reimbursable costs in connection with Hurricane Bonnie were $33,383, Hurricane George $14,159, Hurricane Dennis $50,136 and Hurricane Floyd $139,490. Cost adjustment in connection with the February 1998 winter storm was a negative $554. Cost in connection with field investigations of 3 shore protection projects was $7,600. Cost in connection with the Advance Contracting Initiative was $48,986. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 31. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 31A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for con- 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 trol of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Upgrading the SCADA system at the powerhouse cost $9,139. Hurricane Fran repairs cost $1,654. Replacing the washhouse at North Bend Park cost $2,646. Cemetery relocations cost $270,121. The Resource Management Office addition cost $312,256. Historic sites survey cost $1,873. The Island Creek pumping plant rehabilitation and replacement cost $242,533. Preliminary assessment and delineation of DDT and Dioxin sites cost $78,555. Preparation and update of Water Control Plan and Reservoir Regulation Manual cost $13,360. Cost adjustment for prior year earth dike modifications resulted in a negative cost of $39,567. Rehabilitation study of 7 main units in the powerhouse cost $56,436. Highway 58 recreation mitigation cost $3,089 in Federal funds. The turbine venting hydraulic study cost $116,500. Mitigation of flood damages at Buggs Island and Cedar Grove archaeological activities cost $193,839. For the Occoneechee State Park boat ramp archaeology cost $29,092 and preparation of the Environmental assessment cost $4,018. The turbine replacement supplemental evaluation cost $25,000. The archaeological survey of the Greenwood Wildlife Management Area cost $7,438. Periodic inspections cost $72,665. Normal operation and maintenance cost $6,148,383. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 31B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. The project is located on Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.). Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Upgrading the SCADA system at the powerhouse cost $79,484. A preliminary investigation of needs for power plant repairs or rehabilitation cost $15,000. Periodic inspections cost $27,192. Normal operation and maintenance cost $2,087,433. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 32. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1999 at elevation 213.21 feet, m.s.l. or 2.79 feet below guide curve. The dry weather patterns attributed to 'La Nina' caused Jordan Lake to continue dropping to the lowest level for the fiscal year on 8 December at 210.31 feet m.s.l. or 5.69 feet below guide curve. From mid December through January several rainfall events attributed to the 'El Nino' weather pattern caused the lake to return to guide curve elevation of 216.00 on 05 January 1999. In late January another rain event caused the lake to rise to just over elevation 220, returning to near guide curve by early February. Through March, April and May the lake remained near guide curve with the exception of rising to near 218 during minor rain events. Jordan Lake level gradually fell below guide curve on 1 June and continued to fall to near elevation 212 feet m.s.l. due to a drought. September brought three back to back hurricanes that brought the lake back to guide curve on 6 September and continued to rise to near elevation 220 before dropping back to near guide curve. Mid September's hurricane pushed the lake to elevation 223.32 feet, m.s.l. or 7.32 feet above guide curve. This was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year. Jordan Lake ended the fiscal year at 223.32 feet m.s.l. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 23.3 percent and conservation pool storage remaining at the minimum elevation was 50.4 percent. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1999 were $11,436,100 making the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1981 $204,909,400. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $54,478. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1999 at elevation 248.40 feet, m.s.l. or 2.60 feet below guide curve. Below average inflows through mid-December caused the lake elevation to fall to 246.03 feet, m.s.l. or 4.07 feet below guide curve on 12 December. This was the minimum lake elevation for the fiscal year. Above average rainfall during December and January caused Falls Lake elevation to stair step upward with each event to peak at elevation 253.80 feet, m.s.l. on 26 January. The lake elevation remained near the guide curve level with minor rises of 252.46, 252.23 and 252.36 feet, m.s.1. in March, April and May, respectively. A return of the 'La Nina' induced drought conditions in late May caused Falls Lake level to begin a gradual decline that continued until late August. The elevation of Falls Lake reached 246.77 feet, m.s.l. on 25 August. Heavy rains associated with Hurricanes Dennis and Floyd in August and September caused Falls Lake level to rise in a stair step manner, ending the fiscal year at elevation, 264.25 feet, m.s.1. or 14.15 feet above guide 6-18 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT curve which was the maximum level reached during the fiscal year. This elevation also represents an all time record level reached since first filling of the project back in 1983. The maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 95.1 percent, and the minimum conservation pool storage remaining was 56 percent. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1999 were $139,919,200 making the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1983 $539,169,600. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $59,015. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1999 at elevation 294.93 feet, m.s.l. or 4.96 feet below guide curve. This low starting elevation was a continuation of the low inflow from the previous fiscal year. The weather phenomena that appeared in the Southeastern United States from January to May, 1997, called 'El Nino', is typically followed by the opposing weather phenomena, 'La Nina.' This weather phenomenon is characterized by drought conditions brought on by low precipitation. Due to above normal rainfall in December the reservoir level quickly rose above a level guide curve by mid-December. Above normal precipitation continued into January and further ascended the lake elevation to a peak of 300.91 feet, m.s.l. or 5.41 feet above guide curve on 25 January. The month of February reverted back to the former low precipitation trend. Consequently, the lake levels fell to near guide curve by the end of February. The beginning of March to mid-April posed a situation of a rising guide curve and the trend for low precipitation. The solution was overcome by a combination of timely periods of short and heavy rainfall events and minimal discharges as needed. Short and heavy rains in mid-March helped raise lake levels that paralleled a rising guide curve. Infrequent and heavy rains continued in April and thus continued to raise the lake to the annual maximum elevation of 302.78 feet; m.s.l. or 0.78 feet above guide curve. May was for the most part a repeat of April. Brief and heavy rainfall events held the lake at or near guide curve. A second peak of 302.61 feet, m.s.l. or 0.61 feet above guide curve occurred on 4 May. It is important to note that the rainfall amounts for March, April and May were below average and the foresight of minimal discharges, power company cooperation and opportune rainfall events made for the successful water storage that was needed for this period. The course of action was highly beneficial in the areas of fish spawning, recreation and downstream water quality. The later half of May to the beginning of September the lake level fell below guide curve as a further result of the weather event, 'La Nina.' JH Kerr's lake level fell to the annual minimum lake level of 292.44 feet; m.s.1. or 7.26 feet below guide curve on 2 September. On 5 and 15 September two Hurricanes made landfall in North Carolina and had indirect impacts on JH Kerr reservoir. Hurricane Dennis made landfall on 5 September. The path began in SE North Carolina bowed towards the piedmont of North Carolina and then back to the coast of SE Virginia. It's impacts on JH Kerr were minimal and the rainfall rose lake levels from elevation 293.10 to 295.32 feet, m.s.l. or 2.22 feet. On 15 September, Hurricane Floyd followed nearly the same path, but was a more powerful and produced much more rain than expected. As with Hurricane Dennis the path of Hurricane Floyd was below the reservoir and the impacts were not direct. JH Kerr's lake level as a result of excessive rain did rise to 301.07 feet; m.s.l. or 1.57 feet above guide curve. The precipitation for the mentioned hurricanes measured 6.03 inches for the upper Roanoke River Basin in the first half of September. During the later half of September a trough of low pressure originating from the Gulf of Mexico and a cold frontal moving down from the Great Lakes region resulted in 3.35 more inches of rain the last week of September. The resulting precipitation further increased JH Kerr's lake level to it's ending fiscal year lake level of 302.60 feet, m.s.l. or 3.1 feet above guide curve on 30 September. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 11 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 100 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 230,897,000 kilowatthours or 46 percent below normal. Annual flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1999 were $4,612,800 making a cumulative total of $390,251,200 since 1952. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $255,044. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began Fiscal Year 1999 at elevation 967.71 feet, m.s.l. or 3.79 feet below the guide curve. The level of Philpott Lake continued to drop into January due to well below average inflows. The Smith River Basin followed nearly the exact weather pattern as the Upper Roanoke River Basin. The year began with the previous year's effects of the 'La Nina' weather pattern. As a result, Philpott's lake level fell to 963.41 feet; m.s.l. or 8.09 feet below guide curve on 1 January. A 'mirrored' operation of JH Kerr was followed at Philpott. Timely, although below average, rainfall events for the months of January to April were observed and reservoir operations were such that full advantage was taken. Discharges were minimal and energy was transferred from Philpott to JH Kerr. Thus, reducing the energy production from Philpott, hence, flow from Philpott was reduced. This operation was started on 2 January until 2 April. The combination of reduced discharges and needed precipitation resulted in a slow ascent of the lake level to the annual maximum elevation of 971.28 feet, m.s.l. or 2.22 feet below guide curve on 24 May. Once the lake level reached this peak the continued effects of 'La Nina', evaporation from summer heat, transfer of energy from JH Kerr to Philpott dropped lake level steadily to the annual minimum elevation of 955.68 feet, m.s.1. or 15.82 feet below guide curve on 23 September. The Hurricane season had no effects on Philpott. The cold front from the Great Lakes region in late September produced enough rainfall to raise Philpott's lake level 1.73 feet or to 957.41 feet, m.s.l at the end of the fiscal year. The lake level ended the fiscal year 14.09 feet below guide curve. No flood pool storage was utilized during the fiscal year. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 11 percent. Gross 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 generation for the fiscal year amounted to 15,852,240 kilowatt hours or 40 percent below normal. There were no flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1999 making the cumulative total $346,205,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $93,053. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1999 at elevation 1028.58 feet, m.s.l., or 1.42 feet below the guide curve elevation of 1030.00 feet, m.s.1. The lake level returned to guide curve elevation on 8 Oct but drier conditions resulted in a continual elevation drop to near 1028.60 feet, m.s.l. on 8 December. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir returned to guide curve on 13 December and remained at or near that level through May 1999. During the period mid December through May several storm events caused minor rises in the reservoir level to elevation with the annual maximum elevation of 1033.81 occurring on 25 January. During the months of June and July, the reservoir level stayed within one foot of the guide curve elevation. Near drought conditions returned in August and September drawing the lake down to the annual minimum elevation of 1026.33 feet m.s.l. or 3.67 feet below guide curve, on 27 September. Minor rainfall brought the level back to 1028.79 by the end of September. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 5.7 percent, and the conservation poolstorage remaining was 86.2 percent at the minimum elevation. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1999 were $292,000 raising the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1963 to $164,009,800. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $59,922. Miscellaneous 33. CAPE FEAR LOCK AND DAM NO. 1 FISH LADDER, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) Location. The project is located at Lock and Dam No. 1 on the Cape Fear River in Bladen County, North Carolina, 39 miles upstream (northwest) of Wilmington, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Kelly, N.C.) Existing project. This project modification for improvements to the environment modifies the Cape Fear River Above Wilmington, N.C. project. The project modification at Lock and Dam No. 1 includes the installation of a prefabricated fish ladder that would provide for passage of anadromous shad and river herring. The project will restore access by these species to 33 miles of high quality spawning habitat in the Cape Fear River above Lock and Dam No. 1. It is anticipated that this project will have a life of 10 to 15 years. This ladder is not expected to pass sturgeon or striped bass; therefore, future studies and projects are needed to provide a comprehensive fish passage solution that addresses all affected species. The fish ladder was attached to the existing lock and dam structure. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $92,000 (1999). The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 24, 1996, under continuing authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of total project modification costs which includes implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include the implementation of betterments. The non-federal contribution will be credit for in-kind work, consisting of monitoring the operation and effectiveness of the fish ladder over two spawning seasons. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Continuing installation of fish ladder and monitoring at a cost of $2,994. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in May 1996 with completion scheduled for May 2000. Monitoring is continuing. 34. SEA TURTLE HABITAT RESTORATION, LONG BEACH, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) Location. This project is located on the oceanfront of the Town of Oak Island (formerly Long Beach), south of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Brunswick County, North Carolina. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Southport, N.C.) Existing project. This project modification for improvement of the environment modifies the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Virginia and the St. Johns River, Florida. The project modification restores sea turtle nesting habitat on Oak Island by placing beach compatible sand from the Yellow Banks Confined Disposal Facility between East 26th Place and East 58th Street to construct a 8,900 foot long main fill and a small dune to discourage turtles from crawling beyond the project. Implementation of a lighting ordinance will provide a more attractive nesting beach and improve survival of hatchlings. The approved estimated cost for construction implementation is $9,823,000 (1999), consisting of $5,000,000 Federal and $4,823,000 non-Federal. The project was approved by the Division Commander on September 17, 1999 under the continuing authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1996, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of total project modification costs which include implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include betterments. The sponsor shall also contribute sufficient additional funds to 6-20 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT keep the Federal cost from exceeding the per project limit of $5,000,000. The non-Federal contribution will consist of credit for required lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way; credit for participation on the Project Coordination Team; and cash. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The feasibility phase was completed at a cost of $43,471. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design and the acquisition of required real estate by the sponsor is underway. The PCA is scheduled to be executed July 2000. The construction contract is scheduled to be awarded November 2000 and substantially complete April 2001. 35. BATI'ERY ISLAND BIRD HABITAT PRESERVATION, N.C. (CAP Section 204) Location. Battery Island is located in the Cape Fear River approximately '/2 mile east of Southport and 24 miles south of Wilmington, North Carolina. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Southport, N.C.) Existing project. This ecosystem restoration in connection with dredging will protect 10 acres of upland nesting habitat for colonial water birds from further erosion by placing approximately 5,400 linear feet of geotubes along the southern and western shorelines of Battery Island and restore 5.5 acres of valuable colonial water bird nesting habitat by placement behind the filled geotubes of material from periodic maintenance dredging of the Wilmington Harbor, N.C. navigation project. The approved estimated cost for construction implementation is $1,272,000 (1999) consisting of $954,000 Federal and $318,000 non-Federal. The project was approved by the Division Commander on January 13, 1999 under the continuing authority of Section 204, Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of total project modification costs which include implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include betterments. The non-Federal contribution will consist of credit for required lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way; credit for participation on the Project Coordination Team; and cash. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work includes completion of the feasibility phase, completion of the plans and specifications phase including coordination with the Sponsor on real estate acquisition, and initiation of construction at a Federal cost of $61,661 and a contributed funds cost of $60,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was approved for construction January 13, 1999. The PCA was executed May 17, 1999. The construction contract was awarded August 10, 1999 and was substantially complete in February 2000. General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $702,876 of which -$19,247 was for navigation studies, $351,981 for shoreline protection studies, $103,651 for watershed/ecosystem studies, $70,184 for Special Investigations, $571 for FERC licenses review, $16,314 for interagency water resources development, $3,525 for National Estuary studies, $2,373 for the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $2,959 for cooperation with other Water Resource Agencies, and $170,565 for planning assistance to states. Contributed funds in the amount of -$19,247 were expended for navigation studies, $283,092 for shoreline protection studies and $245,071 for planning assistance to states. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $426,106. Total costs to September 30, 1999 were $7,805,162. Contributed funds in the amount of $23,321 were expended for the Burgaw Flood study, the cost of which is full paid for by the Cape Fear Resource Conservation and Development, Inc. 38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $696,526. PED costs were closed out for Cape Fear- Northeast Cape Fear River, N.C. at a cost of $925. 6-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. John River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Avon Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Cape Fear River, N.C. above Wilmington 6. Drum Inlet, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 40,000 31,282 10,288 -1,0081 2,991 960,400 958,254 - - - - 31,809 - - - - 31,809' 6,804,000 3,101,000 4,337,000 5,455,800 81,222,2732 6,406,295 3,494,326 4,244,622 5,150,682 80,702,7102 15,142,622 11,279,997 12,509,024 8,266,957 185,798,6713 13,591,014 12,751,096 12,579,027 8,247,475 185,729,0843 - - - - 86,851 - - - - 86,8514 - - - - 667,300 - - - - 667,300 - - - - 74,096 - - - - 74,096 22,710 22,116 7,138 1,215,871 1,623,855 7,732 1,215,871 1,623,855 119,416 119,416 - 239,071 - 211,280 194,402 194,402 818,040' 818,040' -27,433 347,607 4,387,6116 358 347,607 4,387,6116 - - - - 34,000 - - - - 34,000 - - - - 326,225 - - - - 326,225 - - - - 3,759,5737 - - - - 3,759,5737 537,500 598,000 441,793 580,495 23,038,9388 415,067 720,785 448,671 556,760 23,006,5878 - - - - 152,61988 - - - - 152,61988 98,063 1,878,996 390,871 72,055 1,905,465 380,095 3,416 3,723,278 14,242 3,723,278 13,500 13,500 6-22 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total cost to FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 7. Far Creek, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Neuse River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Pamlico and Tar River, N.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - 164,642 - 164,642 23,907 23,734 7,074 494,148 2,299,345 7,246 494,148 2,299,345 11,181 11,181 11,181 11,181 - - - - 241,2729 - - - - 241,27210 659,626 432,631 235,007 443,143 11,318,599 658,727 433,480 235,057 441,783 11,317,239 670,570 -200,000 330,000 96,225 330,201 397,219 - 92,650 - 92,65011 90,000 9,747,51512 87,852 9,721,39712 3,351,600 3,392,000 3,120,646 3,234,718 93,604,456 3,309,608 3,382,956 2,813,750 3,576,334 93,508,399 399 -176,346 79,000 75,000 -4,000 115,625 2,684,993 - 56,570 2,621,315 - 13,204,70713 - 13,204,70713 2,346,400 6,769,505 2,535,716 4,823,440 76,356,47014 2,313,104 3,918,162 5,396,328 4,856,221 76,348,76314 -155 -57,518 2,740 2,740 2,731,996 2,731,996 5,900 52,100 2,519 47,998 1,141 1,141 132,345 132,345 6,348 6,348 17,930 17,930 28,966 1,836,778 28,965 1,827,294 - 465,223 - 465,223 309 336,747 309 336,747 - 12,000"15 - 12,000"15 - 674,651 - 674,651 633 1,220,413 633 1,220,413 6-23 See Section in Texat a Proiect Fundinag FY96 FYa 97 -FY- 98v REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 13. Roanoke River, N.C. 14. Rollinson Channel, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 4,039 4,039 2,684 416,821 2,684 352,676 371 371 404,584 404,584 708,419 708,419 589,105 589,105 -60,036 343,090 2,650,993 4,109 343,090 2,650,993 41,142 41,142 184,284 184,284 49,964 716,708 173,864 49,964 701,705 188,867 32,681 8,815,815 31,689 8,814,823 75,000 75,000 268,381 268,381 - 39,801 - 39,801 14,492 565,257 12,711 566,257 - 17,000 - 14,800 -240,000 5,400,000 5,580,951 5,896,574 583 583 9,005 10,005 - 1,181,650 - 1,181,650 15,000 274,000 13,791 272,791 - 502,567 - 502,567 82,502 4,170,538 35,181 4,123,217 -2,200 - 17,252 - - 17,252 4,465,000 7,561,200 48,500,42616 3,908,876 7,783,606 48,027,20116 7,485,260 8,225,500 6,008,493 3,890,410 121,023,18617 7,545,033 8,197,479 5,648,322 3,930,773 120,475,48117 3,000,000 2,400,000 3,160,000 1,369,253 12,329,253 1,928,385 2,557,591 3,589,853 1,110,622 11,549,612 749,000 1,238,885 1,123,224 478,645 10,889,96418 459,589 1,261,682 583,347 895,278 10,499,96418 6-24 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 19A. B. Everett Jordon New Work: Dam and Lake, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 20. Carolina Beach and New Work: Vicinity, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 21. Clinton Wastewater New Work: Treatment Plant, Clinton, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 22. Danville (Southside Waste- New Work: water Treatment Plant), Va. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 23. Hamlet City New Work: Lake, N.C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 24. Moravian Creek, New Work: Wilkesboro, N.C. Aprop. Cost 25A. Falls Lake, N.C. New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 26. Roanoke River Upper Basin New Work: Va. - Headwaters Area Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 720,000 1,251,300 615,000 110,000 149,407,287 696,590 1,282,395 995,559 227,109 149,276,473 1,082,000 1,318,000 1,569,000 1,193,000 18,610,64319 1,098,274 1,249,813 1,634,012 1,199,057 17,580,5232 - - - - 1,764,735 - - - - 1,764,735 270,000 2,497,000 6,197,000 378,329 2,671,349 6,200,059 968,000 3,917,000 1,437,000 - 1,801,647 4,113,983 61,000 27,117 10,000 41,023 55,000 23,985,533 288,232 23,887,624 -310,723 15,176,34721 46,181 15,126,88121 14,000 64,000 720,00022 21,990 76,768 719,127 - 144,000 - 41,527 17,000 130,000 14,706 120,947 - 50,000 - 33,091 139,162 8,575 13,396 51,062 1,487,329 304,035 280,000 20,000 55,000 11,272 26,257 144,000 41,527 591 232,59124 4,596 232,591u -3,029 484 46,971 46,971 - 3,155,000 82,683 2,719,908 19,868 15,000 10,000 45,357 15,425 850,000 973,000 850,000 1,213,742 386,428 1,287,256 1,069,700 1,132,000 983,000 986,137 1,221,861 923,866 77,976 -1,081 109,000 258,000 591,000 98,535 176,148 459,852 304,035 299,868 228,00026 225,88927 625,000 184,097,996 883,872 183,553,932 948,000 17,890,26119 985,088 17,847,35320 - 251,268 - 192,216 358,000 3,497,000 539,504 3,421,627 626,586 580,855 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 27. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 28A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. 31A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 31B. Philpott Lake, Va. 33. Cape Fear Lock &, Dam No. 1 Fish Ladder, N.C. 34. Sea Turtle Habitat, Long Beach, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) 35. Battery Island Bird Habitat Preservation, N.C. (CAP Section 204) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp.- Cost New Work: Approp.- Cost New Work: Approp.- Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 23,320 75,000 1,005,000 70,572 944,802 - 4,609,100 50,332 4,551,783 630,204 549,457 3,250,93328 3,170,18628 - - - - 8,841,326 - - - - 8,841,326 4,111,000 2,481,000 1,581,000 1,487,000 36,932,90429 3,921,864 2,673,202 1,656,217 1,512,678 36,885,22430 - - - - 94,402,927 - - - - 94,402,927 7,648,000 11,397,500 7,056,000 7,256,000 150,882,18831 7,582,398 10,863,691 7,802,850 7,549,030 150,670,60332 383,657 57,847 390,657 64,847 - - - - 14,796,384 - - - - 14,796,384 2,014,100 2,855,000 2,089,000 2,147,000 45,241,59633 1,983,736 2,934,811 2,071,419 2,209,109 45,208,08134 63,000 11,301 7,000 32,557 150,000 4,792 - -12,000 10,247 2,994 58,0035 57,09936 30,000 41,000 221,0003" 163,663 43,471 215,92638 - 127,000 55,000 - 115,339 61,661 - - 311,000 - - 60,000 182,00039 177,00040 311,000 60,000 Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 10. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 11. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 12. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual costs. 13. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 6-26 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 14. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 15. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, NC. 16. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 18. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 19. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 20. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 21. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 22. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 82, $10,000; FY 83, $85,000; FY 84, $70,000; FY 85, $35,000; FY 86, $45,000; FY 87, $30,000; FY 88, $1,000; FY 89, $55,000; FY 90, $85,000; FY 92, $39,484 and preconstruction planning funds: FY92, $516; FY 94, $40,000; FY 95, $75,000; FY 96, $61,000; FY 97, $10,000; FY 98, $14,000 and FY 99, $8,813. 23. Includes preauthorzation study costs: FY82, $4,828; FY 83, $76,218; FY 84, $61,709; FY 85, $41,994; FY 86, $36,550; FY 87, $49,888; FY 88, $3,562; FY 89, $30,816; FY 90, $32,657; FY91, $63,108; FY 92, $50,468; FY 93, $3,024; FY 94, $662 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 94, $25,758; FY 95 $70,987; FY 96, $27,117; FY 97, $41,023; FY 98, $21,990; and FY 99 $22,454. 24. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 91, $40,000; FY 93, $591; and preconstruction planning funds: FY93, $24,409; FY 94, $1,000; FY 95, $19,000; and FY 96, $13,473. Does not include $90,000 of FY 84, FY 85 and FY 86 funds for an earlier study terminated in 1986 due to single user policy. 25. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 91, $5,385; FY 92, $27,643; FY 93, $7,563; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 93, $725; FY 94, $24,646; FY 95, $17,806; and FY 96, $14,705. Does not include $90,000 of FY 84, FY 85 and FY 86 costs for an earlier study terminated in 1986 due to single user policy. 26. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 91, $70,000; FY 92, $15,000; FY 93, $3,000; FY 94, $35,000; FY 95, $4,543 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 95, $457; FY 96, $20,000; FY 97, $55,000; FY 98, $15,000 and FY 99, $10,000. 27. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 91, $12,573; FY 92, $69,544; FY 93, $57; FY 94, $32,103; FY 95, $13,311; FY 96, -$45 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 96, $11,317; FY 97, $26,257; FY 98, $45,357 and FY 99, $15,425. 28. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 29. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76 T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 30. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 31. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 32. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 33. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 34. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 35. Includes planning and design analysis funds: FY 96, $9,296; and construction implementation funds: FY 96, $53,704. 36. Includes planning and design analysis cost: FY 96, $9,296; and construction implementation cost: FY 96, $2,005. 37. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 97, $150,000; FY 98, $30,000, FY 99, $40,000 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 99, $1,000. 38. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 97, $4,792; FY98, $167,663; FY 99, $43,471. 39. Includes preauthorized study funds: FY 98, $127,000; FY 99, $3,000 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 99, $36,000. 40. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 98, $115,339; FY 99, $14,667 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 99, $36,000. 6-27 TABLE 6-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Project and Workd Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4,19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. 5 A 12-foot channel in New River. 6 11 Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7, 12 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. H.D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D.589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1478,63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H.D. 450,69th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H.D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.1 H.D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H.D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 H.D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 1 Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 6-28 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Project and Workd Authorized Documents November 7, 1966 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Maintenance of a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N.C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken and Core Creek. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. (See Section 5 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. 6-29 H.D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.1 H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p.10 13 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.1 H.D. 776, 69th Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 334, 76th Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 111, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Project and Workd Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 October 17, 1940 February 7, 1967, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19359 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 11, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 22, 1967, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 February 17, 1969, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 3, 1975, Sec. 107 July 14, 196010 SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 20 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 21 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels, 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis to 7 feet. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H.D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 S.D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report Dec. 12, 1962 Detailed Project Report March 13, 1967 Detailed Project Report Dec. 21, 1967 Detailed Project Report Feb. 8, 1974 Contains latest published maps. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99-662. 12. Training wall at Masonboro Inlet deauthorized April 5, 1999 under authority of Sec. 1001 (b)(1), PL99-662. 6-30 1. 2. 3. 4. WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control1 (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C.' 1998 18,501 443,889 Bay River, N. C.' 1950 44,382 49,627 Belhaven harbor, N.C.' 1998 126,687 773,175 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C.' 1997 88,328 3,280,694 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C.' 1998 42,029 848,560 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1941 64,395 32,247 Edenton Harbor, N. C.1 1960 73,750 47,642 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.",2 19613 80,500 48,969 Mackay Creek, N. C.' 19383 13,375 6,273 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C.' 1998 346,240 948,694 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.' 19103 13,750 414 Scuppernong River, N. C.' 1950 81,164 87,282 Shallotte River, N.C.' 1998 18,181 568,203 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C.' 1989 113,273 52,945 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.1,4 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,299 Waterway connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C.' 1997 751,099 193,880 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1984 68,325 166,602 1. Completed. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, Meherrin River, N. C., transferred to Norfolk under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. District. 6-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. 1997 5,966,730 Fort Macon Park, N. C.1 1973 620,000 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-32 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C.' Black River, Hamrnett County, N. C.' Blackberry Creek, Henry Country, Va.' Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.' Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)'0 Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1939-194 Core Creek, N. C.' Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C.' Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C."9 Gardners Creek, N. C.' Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' King (Water Plant), N.C.' Leesville, Va.1 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C." Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C."9 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C.' Neuse River, Oriental, N. C.' New River, N. C.' 195 New River, Onslow County, N. C.' N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C.' Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Old Field Swamp, N. C."9 Oriental, South Avenue, N.C.' Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.' Randleman Lake, N.C. Reddies River Lake, N. C." Roaring River Lake, N. C." Simmons Bay, N. C.9 South Creek, N. C.' Stuart, Va.1 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and Tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C.' Thomasville (Walnut Street), N.C.' Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. C.'" 9 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C.' 1976 1960 3 & 1958 1965 1989 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1984 1998 1989 1982 1974 1978 1979 1997 1992 0 & 1956 1972 1998 1961 1969 1997 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1994 1980 1978 1963 1971 1989 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1996 1953 1961 1963 Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under continuing authority. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 8. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 9. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 10. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 11. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 12. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 6-33 1987 1984 1994 1972 4,901,854 475,574 22,870 283,846 572,1144 29,867 50,889 236,2238 175,315 394,055 223,413 138,1175 37,7773 374,005 54,5977 167,800 50,430 606,18912 270,227 367,755 430,951 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 638,500 370,446 51,896 580,977 708,000 95,873 86,600 542,800 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,60223 4,786,088 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,3676 2,220,440 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 59,919 64,769 67,821 214,286 - - - 623,687 61,473 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 6-G Project DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Masonboro Inlet - Training Wall AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - New River Onslow County, N. C. AIWW - Peltier Creek, N. C. 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, Cape Lookout, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N.C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N.C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern, N. C. North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon, N. C. Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960, as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99- 662. 7. Cost-to-date included in remaining authorized portion of project (Engineering and Design only). 8. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(2), PL 99-662. 6-34 For Last Full Report See Annual report For Contributed Funds Expended 1982 1998 None 1990 None None None None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 1980 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 1990 Date Deauthorized 8 Sept. 812 5 April 998 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 17 Nov. 865 23 Sept. 86'1 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 824 17 Nov. 86'5 1 Nov. 811 31 Mar. 782 9 Jul. 958 5 Aug. 77'1 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 86'5 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77'1 17 Nov. 86'5 17 Nov. 86'5 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77'1 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 Federal Funds Expended 219,477 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 698,400 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 129,592 157,721 234,032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 -I WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Beaufort Harbor, N.C. August 1999 Masonboro Inlet & Connecting Channels July 1999 Rollinson Channel, N.C. March - September 1999 Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. March - September 1999 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. August 1999 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Durant Channel, Dare County, N.C. 3,856 Morehead City Harbor, Pine Knoll Shores, N.C.1 96,7722 Newport River, Carteret County, N.C. 66,841 Walter Slough, Dare County, N.C. 38,3723 1. Sec. 111 Project. 2. Includes $29,444 contributed funds.. 3. Includes $19,379 contributed funds. 6-35 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type capacity Dverlopment Construction Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (Ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) and Damages' 23. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan2 Moncure, N.C. Haw 4.3 River Basin, Howards Mill" Carthage, N.C. Deep 55.0 N.C. Randleman' Randleman, N.C. Deep 85.0 Small reservoirs - Various - 31. Neuse River Falls2 Falls, N.C. Neuse - Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Wilson Mills, N.C. Neuse - Beulahtown Kenly, N.C. Little - Bakers Mills Princeton, N.C. Little - Little Buffalo Kenly, N.C. Little Buffalo Creek - Buckhorn Wilson, N.C. Contentnea Creek - Wiggins Mill Wilson, N.C. Contentnea Creek - Stantonsburg Stantonsburg, N.C. Tisnot Swamp - Great Swamp Fremont, N.C. Great Swamp - Black Creek Wilson, N.C. Black Creek - Aycock Swamp Fremont, N.C. Aycock Swamp - Hillsboro Durham, N.C. Eno - Orange Durham, N.C. Little - 34. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Yadkin-Pee Dee 404.0 Basin, N.C.& S.C. O' 37. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Boydton, Va. Roanoke 178.7 Basin, Va. and N.C.2 N.C. Philpott, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke 336.2 Gaston, Va. and N.C.' Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke 144.9 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke 137.0 Smith Mountain, Va.' Altavista, Va. Roanoke 314.2 Leesville, Va.' Altavista, Va. Roanoke 293.7 Taber, Va. Altavista, Va. Roanoke 275.0 Melrose, Va. Bookneal, Va. Roanoke 262.9 Randolph, Va. Chase City,Va. Roanoke 227.8 Stuart, Va. and N.C. Spray, NC Roanoke 297.2 Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Danville, Va. Roanoke 265.9 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $44,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $13,637,000 presently allocated to water supply and $21,595,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 112 E 753,500 106 E 233,000 110 E 108,000 20 to 70+ E 923,000 92 E 335,620 81 CG,E 201,000 50 E 81,000 53 E 36,000 51 E 13,000 63 E 119,000 42 E 35,000 36 E 48,000 39 E 18,000 33 E 17,000 37 E 7,000 136 E 123,000 107 E 57,000 148 E 153,000 144 CG,E 2,808,000 220 CG" 249,800 108 CG,E 432,000 75 CG 59,300 244 CG 825,000 95 CG,E 76,900 54 CG 34,000 110 CG,E 120,000 147 CG,E 350,000 138 E 163,000 126 CG,E 248,000 89,186,000 18,874,000 62,300,000 91,334,000 5,749,343 204,000 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 58,414,000 14,726,000 61,700,000 91,666,000 3,360,657 147,600,000'(P 33,600,000'1 124,000,0001 38,454,000 183,000,000' 13,000,000 9,300,000 6,600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700,000 5,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550,000 8,100,000 3,500,000 9,110,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,000( 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1,157,000 3,500,000 800,000 3,800,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 6,000,000 4,700,000 1,100,000 6,400,000 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31,800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,00010 26,800,000 10,100,000 36,000,000 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $74,058,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,646,000 allocated to recreation and $8,296,000 to flood control to be paid by local intersts during construction. 14. Deauthorized July 1995. Key E ..................................... Earth CG ................................. Concrete-Gravity 0 y tT1 0s 7d 0j OY r 0 '0 y0 C0 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 6-K Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Adkin Branch, Kinston, N. C. 22,029 Big Foot Creek, Clarkton, N.C. 26,720 Dan River, Halifax County, N.C. 31,714 Hominy Swamp, Wilson, N. C. 259 White Marsh, Whiteville, N.C. 12,047 Tar River, River Road, Greenville, N.C.' 32,136 John H. Kerr, Wolftrap Waterfowl Impoundment, Va.2 2,504 Little Sugar Creek Habitat Restoration, N.C.2 128,745 Little Sugar Creek Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, N.C.3 44,071 Wanchese Marsh Creation and Protection, Dare County, N.C.4 61,594 1. 2. 3. 4. Sec. 14 Project Sec. 1135 Project. Sec. 206 Project. Sec. 204 Project. 6-37 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC .................. 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL .......... 3. Charleston Harbor, SC .................... 4. Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC ............................ 5. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC .......... 6. Folly River, SC ............... .......... 7. Georgetown Harbor, SC ................... 8. Little River Inlet, NC and SC ................ 9. Murrells Inlet, SC ......................... 10. Port Royal Harbor, SC ...................... 11. Shipyard River, SC ...................... 12. Town Creek, SC ......................... 13. Reconnaissance and Condb.ion Surveys ........ 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 7-1 7-2 7-2 7-3 7-3 7-4 7-4 7-5 7-5 7-5 7-5 7-6 7-6 7-6 7-6 Shore Protection 16. M yrtle Beach, SC .......................... 7-6 17. Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects ..... .7-7 18. Shore Protection Work Under Special Authorization7-7 Flood Control 19. Inspection of Completed Works .............. 20. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....... 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 22. Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC ............ 7-7 7-7 7-7 7-7 Emergency Bank Protection 23. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization 7-7 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. 24. 25. 26. Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, Myrtle Beach, SC . 7-8 Castle Pinckney, Charleston, SC .............. 7-8 Hunting Island State Park Waste Treatment Plant, SC .................................. 7-8 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 27. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ..... .7-8 Miscellaneous 28. Ecosystem Restoration and Protection .......... 7-9 29. Miller Corner Phragmites Control, SC ......... .7-9 30. Emergency Response Activities.............. 7-9 General Investigations 31. Active Investigations ....................... 7-9 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 7-10 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ............... 7-14 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 7-20 Table 7-D Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects .......................... . 7-20 Table 7-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 7-21 Table 7-F Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 7-21 Table 7-G Deauthorized Projects................. 7-22 Table 7-H Other Authorized Streambank Erosion Control Projects ..................... 7-23 Table 7-I Active General Investigations ........... 7-24 Table 7-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 7-25 Table 7-K Inspection of Completed Works ......... 7-25 Table 7-L Other Authorized Environmental Projects . 7-25 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Division, is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 4,550 acres, with the worst infestations occurring in the Cooper River, Lakes Marion and Moultrie, the Santee Coastal Reserve, and Lake Greenwood. During FY 99, 3,259 acres of aquatic plants in 19 water bodies were treated with herbicides. The total cost of control operations (non-Federal and Federal) in FY 99 was $453,071. The total Federal share of work performed in FY 99 was $79,459. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by Eastern Dredging using a pipeline dredge in the AIWW from Winyah Bay to Charleston during February 1999 - April 1999, removing 678,980 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,889,755. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Myrtle Beach Canal area during May 1999 - June 1999 was $225,000. Costs of $273,065 were incurred for contract dike maintenance. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $623,144. Federal costs for the project were $3,010,964. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, SC, and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938; page 425 of the Annual Report for 1962; and page 7-2 of the Annual Report for 1997. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1996 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the entrance channel from 42 ft deep to 47 ft deep and the inner channels from 40 ft deep to 45 ft deep. Other improvements include realignment/widening of various channels/reaches, construction of a new turning basin opposite the future Daniel Island terminal, construction of a new contraction dike, reconstruction of two existing dikes and removal of a third existing dike. Ultimate project cost after 10% reimbursement will be $85,433,000 (Federal) and $53,267,000 (non-Federal) for a total project cost of $138,700,000 (fully funded). (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas, after reductions for such credit have been made in the required cash payments. Provide and maintain, at its own expense, the local service facilities. All berthing areas will be maintained at the project depth of 45 ft at all commercial terminals, piers, and docks. Pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facilities during construction. Reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs of general navigation features allocated to commercial navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction, as partially reduced by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights of way, and relocations, provided for commercial navigation. The non-Federal partner is the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 5, 1998. Terminal facilities. The SC State Ports Authority owns and operates four public terminals and a grain elevator in Charleston Harbor. These terminals offer more than two miles of berthing space, room enough for seventeen vessels at one time. The Ports Authority operates fifteen custom-built container cranes and a variety of gantry and mobile cranes for breakbulk applications. On the land side, Charleston has extensive interstate and rail connections and is served by over 100 motor carriers. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT companies including storage tank farms. Modemrn facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The Charleston Naval Complex Redevelopment Authority is currently marketing the former naval facilities to private industry and businesses. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Dredging was performed (a) by Great Lakes using a cutterhead dredge in the Entrance Channel during June 1999 - September 1999, removing 1,298,669 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $7,924,110, and (b) by Norfolk Dredging using a clam/bucket dredge in the Lower Harbor during July 1999 - September 1999, removing 311,050 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $2,636,977, and ( c) costs of $935,000 were paid to Great Lakes for mobilization efforts in September 1999 for Daniel Island Widening dredging . Costs of (a) $358,999 were incurred for demolition of the east contraction dike on Daniel Island, and (b) $920,858 were incurred for rehabilitation/construction of three contraction dikes, and (c) $158,602 for diking and trenching efforts at the Clouter Creek Disposal Area. Real estate costs, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,176,881. The South Carolina State Ports Authority paid costs of $1,072,316 to carry dredged material to their proposed future terminal site on Daniel Island instead of being taken to the ocean disposal site. Federal costs were $11,230,545. Maintenance: Dredging was performed (a) by Eastern Dredging Company using a pipeline dredge in the inside shoals including Wando River during October 1998 - December 1998, removing 45,917 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $426,642, and (b) by Bean Stuyvesant, L.L.C. in the Entrance Channel during January 1999 - February 1999, removing 1,562,690 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $3,334,708, and (c) by Great Lakes using a cutterhead dredge in the Entrance Channel during June 1999 - September 1999, removing 11,447 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $785,032, and (d) by Norfolk Dredging using a clam/bucket dredge in the Lower Harbor during July 1999 - September 1999, removing 190,799 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $441,781, and (e) cost of $130,000 were paid to Southern Dredging for mobilization efforts in September 1999 for Ordnance Reach dredging. Costs of $1,051,888 were incurred for diking activities at Clouter Creek. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $741,320. Federal costs for maintenance were $6,911,371. 4. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston, SC. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) All works of improvement are in Berkeley County about 45 miles from Charleston, SC. Existing Project. The completed Cooper River, Charleston Harbor project (See Section 5) resulted in significant reduction in the transfer of blueback herring into the Santee Cooper Lakes. The landlocked striped bass fishery, a major tourist attraction, is dependent on these fish for forage. A model study, completed in March 1992 at CEWES, determined how the turbine discharge could be prevented from overwhelming the attractant flow through the fish lift and how best to improve fish passage. Phase I construction consisted of installation of new wing walls to keep turbulence from the turbines from interfering with the attractant flow to the fish lift entrance. Construction of Phase I was 100% complete in FY 95. Phase IIA work consisted of installing adjustable weirs and control equipment on the newly installed concrete wingwalls. Construction was completed in January 1998. Phase IIB work will consist of installation of three 42 inch siphon pipes, intake structure and outfall structure to increase flow to attract fish. Phase IIB is scheduled for completion in March 2000. Monitoring of the fish lift operation for two years after construction will be required to gather and analyze data to be used to refine the operation of the fish lift and to ensure its effectiveness. Total estimated cost of the project is $6,450,000, all Federal. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract for Phase IIB was awarded to Republic Contracting on November 19, 1998 (see above existing project write-up for description of phase). Construction payments in FY 99 for Phase IIB were $2,113,439. Costs for model testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration were $182,322. Federal costs for the project were $2,295,761. 5. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests, this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a fish hatchery. Construction as initiated March 1977. The power-on-line date was March 1985. The power plant, channels and canals, and attendant work was completed in FY 85. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Design efforts for the modification of the cooling towers were terminated because the cost to fix the towers is more than paying the impact cost. The cooling towers were not able to deliver the required cooling capacity after the project came online in March 1985. The Corps bears all lost capacity costs until such time as the facility or its operation can be modified at our expense to eliminate such losses. Capacity loss payment was $251,501. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $12,021. Federal costs for the project were $263,522. Maintenance: Funds of $3,046,845 were spent for maintenance of completed work. 6. FOLLY RIVER, SC Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River three miles through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with the Folly River. The existing project was completed in FY 79. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry during June 1999 at a cost of $166,650. Condition and operations studies, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $37,780. Federal costs for the project were $204,430. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 - 1904. (See Table 7- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one 500 foot concrete pier with creosote-timber fenders and one 700 foot concrete and steel bulkhead, both of which are backed up by 25 acres of paved area. Since 1984 approximately $8.5 million has been spent on structures and improvements by the SC State Ports Authority and private interests. Other than the 700 foot bulkhead, recent improvements include a 43,000 foot warehouse, salt dome, cement dome, three lumber sheds, plus acquisition of ten additional acres of land. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) by Marinex in the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay by pipeline dredge during October 1998, at a cost of $177,276, and (b) by Southern Dredging in the Sampit River and By-Pass area by pipeline dredge during June 1999 - September 1999, removing 858,339 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,517,000. Costs of $78,485 were paid to NATCO Limited Partnership for costs incurred in FY 98. Costs of $402,145 were incurred for dike maintenance. Water control 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT management, natural resource management, condition and operation studies, project operations management, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $451,749. Federal costs for the project were $2,626,655. 8. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,284 feet and 3,830 feet long on the east and west sides of the inlet, respectively. The project was completed in FY 84. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and supervision and administration costs were $12,570. 9. MURRELLS INLET, SC Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. The existing project was completed in 1981. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies, water control management costs, mapping, and supervision and administration costs were $17,553. 10. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of the mouth of the Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The existing project was completed in 1959. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities include one 565 foot concrete wharf and one 50 ton gantry crane. Since the late 1980's improvements to the port facilities consist of two large cargo tanks for storage of clay, a freezer for exports, additional warehouse space and the dock has been reinforced. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: None. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $114,664. Federal costs for the project were $114,664. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U. S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about one and one-half miles and empties into the Cooper River, about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932, page 463 of Annual Report for 1944, and page 534 of the Annual Report for 1952. Existing project. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act authorized deepening to 38 feet and enlarging the lower turning basin to 1000 ft. as part of the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. New work dredging was accomplished in 1989 and 1996 under the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. The entrance channel and the lower turning basin have been deepened to 38 feet. Cost for that work is reflected in the cost for the Charleston Harbor improvement. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Located in the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are wharves operated by the Chevron USA Products Company and the Shipyard River Coal Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and miscellaneous dry bulk materials. Located mid-channel are Salmons Dredging Corporation, Detyens Shipyard, and Pre-Stress Concrete Company. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Mobilization costs of $20,000 were incurred by Southern Dredging in September 1999. Water control management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $12,727. Federal costs for the project were $32,727. 12. TOWN CREEK, SC Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, SC. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. The existing project was completed in 1975. In 1989, Hurricane Hugo breached Sandy Point and created a new inlet to the ocean. This inlet continued to increase in size and was being used by local traffic to get to the Atlantic Ocean. In 1997, the district requested authority to maintain this new inlet in lieu of the existing authorized channel. Our request to abandon the existing Town Creek channel alignment and establish the Clark's Creek channel alignment was approved by headquarters. The proposed channel relocation, due to natural occurrences, is within the scope of the project authorization. The authorized project dimensions of 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide shall be maintained as appropriate. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry during April 1999 - May 1999, at a cost of $166,225. Condition and operations studies, water control management, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $6,806. Federal costs for the project were $173,031. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $19,544 were incurred for a survey of the Ashley River. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 7-C.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Calabash Creek, NC, $13,747 and Murrells Inlet, $7,390. Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Section 3, Public Law 79-14.) No costs incurred. Shore Protection 16. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Location. Myrtle Beach is located along the northern coast of SC. The area is commonly referred to as the Grand Strand. The Grand Strand extends from Little River Inlet at the NC border, in a southerly direction, to Murrells Inlet, SC for a total distance of approximately 37 miles. This project includes the developed area along the coast of Horry County, SC and a portion of the coastal area of Georgetown County, SC. Major municipalities in the project area include the cities of Myrtle Beach and North Myrtle Beach, Garden City, and the Town of Surfside Beach. Existing project. The plan of improvement would place about 5.1 million cubic yards of sand over a total project reach of 25.4 miles of beach encompassing three separable reaches. 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT This material will come from offshore borrow sites. Periodic nourishment will be required once every 8 to 10 years throughout the project life of 50 years. All work is programmed. Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) of initial construction is $35,188,000 Federal and $18,947,000 non-Federal for a total of $54,135,000. Estimated cost of periodic nourishment is $105,347,000 Federal and $56,725,000 non-Federal for a total project cost of $216,207,000. Sand placement on the North Myrtle Beach reach was completed in May 1997 placing 2.5 million cubic yards of sand. Sand placement on the Myrtle Beach reach was completed in January 1998 placing 2.3 million cubic yards of sand. Sand -placement on the Garden City/Surfside reach was completed in November 1998 placing 1.5 million cubic yards of sand. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of the FY 1995 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Costs of $98,000 were paid to Great Lakes for costs incurred on the North Myrtle Beach reach in FY 97. Grassing costs for the Myrtle Beach reach were $640,139. Sand placement was performed by NATCO Limited Partnership along Garden City/Surfside reach by hopper dredge during October 1998 - November 1998, placing 1,099,494 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $8,275,258. Federal share of contract payments was $5,776,833. Review of local sponsor acquisitions, engineering and design, monitoring, and supervision and administration costs were $453,271. Federal costs for the project were $6,230,104. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Table 7-D.) 18. SHORE PROTECTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shore Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). No cost incurred in FY 99. Flood Control 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $15,003. For project inspection data see Table 7-K. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-J) 22. TURKEY CREEK, SUMTER COUNTY, SC Location. City of Sumter, SC. Existing project. Flooding was occurring within the City of Sumter along Turkey Creek. Homes, businesses, industries, and public properties were inundated and received damages during flood events. The project consisted of 3,200 feet of channel modification, improvement of a crossing by excavating 170 cubic yards of material from between the creek and a tributary, and enlargement of a railroad culvert. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 19, 1997 with the City of Sumter. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded 15 September 1998 to Rowe, Inc. Construction was completed in March 1999 at a cost of $287,410. A contract modification is being negotiated for change in site conditions. Federal share of contract payments was $189,617. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $43,754. Federal costs for the project were $233,371. Emergency Bank Protection 23. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Mosquito Creek, Bennett's Point Field Station, SC, $18,746; Pitt Street, Mt. Pleasant, SC, $3,820; Morris Island Lighthouse, SC $22,158; and Coordination Account, $5,749. (See Table 7-H for Other Authorized Streambank Erosion Control Projects.) 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. No costs were incurred in FY 99. 24. SHORE DRIVE SINGLETON SWASH, MYRTLE BEACH, SC Location. Singleton Swash is located adjacent to Shore Drive. Shore Drive is an area of Horry County just north of Myrtle Beach, SC. Existing project. Approximately 634 feet of Shore Drive located parallel to Singleton Swash was being threatened by shoreline erosion caused by tidal action of the Atlantic Ocean. The water had eroded the embankment to within approximately 1-foot of the pavement at several locations along the roadway. Shore Drive is a two lane asphalt surface road that provides the only means of ingress and egress for several large beachfront hotels and condominiums, and numerous homes and businesses. Horry County had attempted to slow the erosion by placing various types of rubble along the embankment without success. The project consisted of placement of approximately 438 cubic yards of 12-inch riprap with approximately 160 cubic yards of 6- inch bedding along a distance of 634 feet. Underlying the bedding was approximately 1,878 square yards of geotextile fabric to aid in stability. Approximately twelve drainage outlets were built into the project to aid water runoff from Shore Drive thereby preventing blowout of the armored bank. A curb, gutter, and sidewalk betterment was included in the project at the sponsor's request and cost. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Horry County signed the initial Project Cooperation Agreement on 11 May 1995 and an amendment on 17 June 1998. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded to Herve Cody on September 4, 1998. Construction was completed in December 1998 at a cost of $145,121. Federal share of contract payments was $72,421. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $10,366. Federal costs for the project were $82,787. 25. CASTLE PINCKNEY, CHARLESTON, SC Location. Castle Pinckney is located on the southern tip of Shutes Folly Island in Charleston Harbor, Charleston, SC. Castle Pinckney is accessible only by boat. It is one of a series of forts which made up the defenses of Charleston during the Civil War. Existing project. Throughout its long history, the south end of Shutes Folly Island has experienced accelerated erosion. Estimates have shown that the island has eroded from 224 acres in 1711 to less than 64 acres in 1998. The erosion had advanced to such a degree that the main brick fortification was in danger of falling into the water. Efforts to halt erosion had been unsuccessful. The project consisted of construction of a 294 foot long armor stone breakwater over a geotextile filter and 12-inch thick layer of bedding stone. Armor stone sizes range from 1200 lbs to 2000 lbs. The work also included leveling the existing ground surface and placement of a layer of course aggregate. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on May 14, 1999 with the South Carolina State Ports Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded to Ashridge, Inc on July 27, 1999. Construction began on September 23, 1999 and is scheduled for completion in October 1999. Contract costs incurred were $167,512. Federal share of contract payments was $151,432. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $39,127. Federal costs for the project were $190,559. 26. HUNTING ISLAND STATE PARK WASTE TREATMENT PLANT, SC Location.The waste treatment plant is located on the northern section of Hunting Island State Park in Beaufort County, SC. Existing project. Hunting Island was initially nourished by the Corps in 1968 and received an 840 foot terminal groin on the north end. Three subsequent renourishments were completed in 1971, 1975, and 1980. Emergency repair was required to build a dike to stabilize and protect the freshwater wetland that receives treated effluent from the waste treatment plant. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on April 27, 1999 with the South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded to LCR Construction. Construction began in April 1999 and was completed in May 1999. Contract costs incurred were $43,800. Federal share of contract payments was $27,175. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $24,639. Federal costs for the project were $51,814. 27. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER (See Table 7-F.) 7-8 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Miscellaneous 28. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND PROTECTION Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 206, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Fiscal year costs were Cousar Branch, SC, $34,561: Folly Beach Ecosystem, SC, $16,730; Coordination Account, $4,874; and Preliminary Restoration Plans, $87,921. Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 204, Beneficial Use of Dredged Material, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Fiscal year costs were Sand Island, SC $24,226. Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Project Modifications For Improvement of the Environment, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Fiscal year costs were Cape Marsh Management Area, Santee Coastal Reserve, $51,075; Hamlin Creek Extension Habitat Restoration, $2,699; and Coordination Account, $8,989. See Table 7-L for Other Authorized Environmental Projects. 29. MILLER CORNER PHRAGMITES CONTROL, SC Location. The Miller Corner Disposal Area is located along the northwest corner of the Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center near the intersection of Winyah Bay and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, near the City of Georgetown, in Georgetown County SC. Existing project. In the past two year, phragmites has taken root in the disposal area. This nuisance plant, which has virtually no beneficial value to wildlife, has the potential of spreading to the adjacent wetlands at the Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center. Unchecked, this nuisance plant will rapidly spread, causing loss of prime wildlife habitat. The thickness of this plant also greatly restricts flow of dredge disposal material. This attribute reduces the useful life of disposal areas. The recommended project consists of both structural and nonstructural measures to significantly reduce the size of existing stands of phragmites and to control its re-emergence and spread. Structural measures include raising approximately 10,600 linear feet of existing interior dike within and approximately 1,500 linear feet of causeway adjoining the Goose Pasture at the Wildlife Center. The dike modifications will be enhanced by the construction and installation of five water intake structures cells. Finally, a trailer-mounter, high-volume discharge pump will be provided to support flooding of the individual cells created by the dike modifications to water levels higher than those currently supported by tidal influx. Non-structural measures include chemical treatment by aerial spraying of the existing stands of phragmites located within the disposal area and the Wildlife Center. The interior sections of the phragmites stands will also be chemically treated by localized, direct application of the chemical spray. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed May 12, 1999 with the SC Department of Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. The sponsor is scheduled to complete the work-in-kind structural modifications in April 2000 at a cost of $47,600. Aerial spraying is scheduled to be completed in June 2000. Federal contract costs incurred for spraying and the pump were $42,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $48,633. Federal costs for the project were $90,633. 30. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES - FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disasters. The Emergency Operations Center was activated three times in FY 99. Operational Program Areas. Federal costs for FY 99 were $340,917 for the Disaster Preparedness Program and $347,590 for Emergency Operations. Total Federal costs incurred under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Program were $689,580. Costs of $36,101 were incurred for the Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program. General Investigations 31. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. in the dikes to support phragmites control through manipulation of water levels and continuous circulation of water between 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC (Contributed Funds) 4 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC 5 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 6 Folly River, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 330,000 318,805 0 0 0 6,666 0 0 167,000 11,887 0 0 0 79.459 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,848,605 10,767,371 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 1 7,455,378 1 5,119,000 2,517,000 2,457,000 3,040,040 77,646,708 2 5,319,569 2,448,351 2,530,265 3,010,964 77,522,599 2 150,000 -56,321 2,000,000 11,957,000 61,670,107 3 158,544 -48,635 869,684 11,230,545 59,813,337 3 3,729,000 4,784,000 4,450,000 6,800,520 141,990,638 4 3,533,449 4,953,257 4,367,712 6,911,371 141,933,520 4 0 -15,152 300,000 4,000,000 16,888,848 5 3,013 43,624 300,000 3,480,881 16,369,729 5 700,000 160,000 380,000 2,260,000 331,597 614,574 403,650 2,295,761 5,325,000 5,278,732 4,585,000 356,321 455,000 280,000 204,357,512 5,185,203 1,432,918 530,275 263,522 204,300,480 3,654,000 4,202,000 3,433,000 2,896,015 52,848,528 6 3,573,977 4,044,274 3,625,660 3,046,845 52,837,595 6 0 0 0 0 243,000 798,000 210,000 176,035 252,125 793,844 190,761 204,430 337,736 337,736 5,342,034 5,341,409 7-10 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC 8 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Contributed Funds) 9 Murrells Inlet, SC (Contributed Funds) 10 Port Royal Harbor, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 0 0 7,061,755 7 7,061,755 7 2,533,000 2,690,000 4,068,000 2,455,920 79,109,558 8 2,423,171 2,822,460 3,884,977 2,626,655 79,045,501 8 0 0 33,000 26,648 0 0 0 0 34,000 37,110 0 8,353 12,280 12,570 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,014 84,000 87.942 0 15,020 14,135 17.553 0 0 0 0 17,037,428 17,037,428 3,004,920 3,004,918 1,521,920 1,521,920 15,502,240 15,502,240 4,129,189 4,128,971 1,536,893 9 1,536,893 9 1,786,100 1,786,100 933,000 133,000 809,000 130,440 14,354,083 932,981 119,173 820,070 114,664 14,334,312 11 Shipyard New Work: River, SC Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 491,974 10 491,974 10 755,000 726,818 5,000 8,586 736,000 755,158 20,630 11,975,184 32,727 11,974,455 7-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Text Total Cost to Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 12 Town Creek, SC (Contributed Funds) 16 Myrtle New Work: Beach, SC Approp. Cost New Work: (Contributed Approp. Funds) Cost 22 Turkey New Work: Creek, SC Approp. Cost New Work: (Contributed Approp. Funds) Cost 24 Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, SC (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,273,000 15,676,000 10,070,000 2,975,000 33,285,000 11 1,139,124 14,794,419 7,600,006 6,230,104 32,917,584 11 1,100,000 7,805,000 4,500,000 2,550,000 15,960,000 12 1,093,000 6,687,598 4,620,290 3,480,169 15,881,056 12 65,000 35,143 26,776 26,776 0 0 1,000 29,699 150,000 962 30,000 23,021 74,700 0 398,000 233,371 0 98,183 88,000 82,787 0 74,653 464,000 298,213 150,000 99,145 144,776 132,583 74,700 74,653 7-12 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 396,000 393,924 0 0 570,000 567,404 0 0 312,000 303,135 0 0 219,521 219,521 7,967,271 7,967,268 8,600 8,600 153,985 173,031 0 0 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Text Total Cost to Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 Castle New Work: 25 Pinckney, SC Approp. 0 15,000 65,000 178,500 258,500 Cost 0 4,625 39,995 190,559 235,179 New Work: (Contributed Approp. 0 0 0 117,700 117,700 Funds) Cost 0 0 0 16,175 16,175 26 Huntington New Work: Island State Approp. 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 Park, SC Cost 0 0 0 51,814 51,814 New Work: (Contributed Approp. 0 0 0 16,625 16,625 Funds) Cost 0 0 0 16,625 16,625 29 Miller New Work: Corner Approp. 0 0 86,000 54,500 140,500 Phragmites Cost 0 0 38,626 90,633 129,259 Control, SC New Work: (Contributed Approp. 0 0 0 11,900 11,900 Funds) Cost 0 0 0 377 377 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous projects. 2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3 Includes $47,395,108 for previous projects and $318,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design on the current project. 4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects and $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds for the existing project. 5 Includes $12,409,848 for the 40 ft project, excludes $2,996,994 credit for LERRD's and $1,966,945 final project reimbursement for the 40 ft project. Includes $179,000 for Preconstructon, Engineering and Design on the current project. 6 Includes $765,000 appropriated and expended in FY 96 under appropriation 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 8 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 9 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 10 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 11 Includes $2,666,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 12 Excludes $1,629,993 credit for LERRD's. 7-13 REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 1 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 1. H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 89-298 Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, SC. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, SC. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) 4 7-14 Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p.1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st. sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 2. TABLE 7-B CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 3. Jun. 18, 1878 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 2 jetties. s Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. 6 (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. 7-15 Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess, pt.1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 64-68. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 94-436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Oct 12, 1996 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 17, 1991 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Deepening of the entrance channel from 42 ft. deep to 47 ft. deep and the inner channels from 40 ft. deep to 45 ft. deep. Other improvements include realignment/widening of various channels/reaches, construction of a new turning basin opposite the future Daniel Island terminal, construction of a new contraction dike, reconstruction of two existing dikes and removal of a third existing dike. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC See Cooper River, Charleston Harbor. Modify the fish lift at the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (Rediversion Project) and monitor operation of the fish lift for two years following such modifications. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) Redivert most of the Santee River waters Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina FOLLY RIVER, SC Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and Folly Creek and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. 104 th Cong. P.L. 104-303 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 P.L. 102-104 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 23, 1977. H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 7-16 4. 5. 6. 7. TABLE 7-B CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Mar 2. 1945 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 MURRELLS INLET, SC Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by the House Comm. on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Comm. on Public Works on Nov 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 7-17 8. 9. REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, SC.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the SC State Ports Authority. H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 2 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. Deepening to 38 feet under the Charleston Harbor, SC authorization. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 TOWN CREEK, SC Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 28, 1990 An entrance channel trelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,a distance of 6.2 miles. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Storm damage reduction for period nourishment over the 50-year life of the project. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 12, 1974. 101st Cong. P.L. 101-640 7-18 10. Sep. 3, 1954 11. 12. 16. TABLE 7-B CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 TURKEY CREEK, SUMTER COUNTY, SC Reduce flooding by construction of 3,200 feet of channel modification; improvement of a crossing by excavating 170 cubic yards of material from between the creek and a tributary; and enlargement of a railroad culvert. SHORE DRIVE, SINGLETON SWASH, MYRTLE BEACH, SC Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. Abate erosion and protect Shore Drive. CASTLE PINCKNEY, CHARLESTON, SC Abate erosion and protect Castle Pinckney. Sec. 14, P.L.79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 24, 1998. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 23, 1999. HUNTINGTON ISLAND STATE PARK WASTE TREATMENT PLANT, SC Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Abate erosion and construct a dike. MILLER CORNER PHRAGMITES CONTROL, SC Reduce the size of existing stands of phragmites and control its reemergence and spread. Sec. 14, P.L.79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 21, 1999. Sec. 1135(b), P.L. 96-662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. 1/Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2/Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-19 22. 24. Jul. 24, 1946 25. Jul. 24, 1946 26. 29. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Annual Operation & Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, SC Completed 1978 $125,697 $29,143 Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC 1/ Completed 1968 379,680 -- Archers Creek, SC Completed 1914 20,646 -- Ashley River, SC Completed 1955 260,996 589,436 Brookgreen Gardens, SC Completed 1992 94,700 2/ 4,011 Edisto River, SC Completed 1938 33,103 2,887 Great Pee Dee River, SC Completed 1950 183,712 271,098 Jeremy Creek, SC Completed 1996 49,987 116,175 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC Completed 1982 9,500 85,595 Mingo Creek, SC Completed 1950 29,050 8,575 Salkahatchie River, SC Completed 1896 15,841 1,936 Santee River, NC & SC Completed 1950 99,750 182,469 Village Creek, SC Completed 1985 26,500 111,314 Waccamaw River, NC and SC Completed 1978 262,814 284,347 Wateree River, SC Completed 1940 60,000 154,559 1 Pilot Program 2 Excludes $7,800 contributed funds OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE TABLE 7-D PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 17 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Annual Report Operation & Project Status For Construction Maintenance Battery Pringle, SC Completed 1996 $99,200 1 -- Folly Beach, SC Completed 1996 $10,652,458 2 -- Hunting Island Beach, SC Completed 1984 $2,872,717 3 -- 1 Excludes $53,379 contributed funds 2 Excludes $1,059,742 contributed funds and $819,693 credit for LERRD's 3 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 7-20 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, NC & SC 1 Completed 1970 $298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, SC 1 Completed 1985 250,000 -- Cowpen Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, SC 1 Completed 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, SC 1 Discontinued 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, SC 1 Completed 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC 1 Completed 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC 1 Completed 1978 247,242 -- Leith Creek, NC 1 3 Completed 1982 430,951-- Little Sugar Creek, NC 1 2 Completed 1969 86,600 -- Old Field Swamp, NC 1 2 Completed 1979 763,022 -- Reddies River Lake, NC 3 Completed 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, SC 1 Discontinued 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC 1 3 Phase I Only 1978 370,000 -- Saluda River, SC 1 Completed 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, SC 1 Completed 1971 248,605 -- Scotts Creek, SC 1 Completed 1988 545,000 -- Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., SC 1 Completed 1971 77,400 -- Simmons Bay Creek, NC 2 Completed 1963 186,435 -- Simpson Creek, SC 1 Completed 1957 81,000 -- Socastee Creek, SC 1 Completed 1996 1,093,800 -- Todd Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 1 Completed 1974 319,669 -- Waccamaw R. & Seven Creeks, NC & SC 1 2 Completed 1961 67,821 -- Wilson Branch, Chesterfield County, SC 1 Completed 1985 277,111 1 Authorized by Chief of Engineers 2 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1980 3 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1984 MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS TABLE 7-F INCLUDING POWER (See Section 27 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC Completed 1992 $29,400,000 1 -- 1 Excludes $770,000 for credits to Santee Cooper 7-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Date Federal Contributed Annual Report and Funds Funds Project for Authority Expended Expended Abbapoola Creek, SC Beresford Creek, SC Charleston Hbr (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 Congaree River, SC Little Pee Dee River, SC Lumber River, SC & NC Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC Reedy River, Greenville, SC 1954 1971 Russell Creek, SC 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 7-22 $1,330,00 0 4,500 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 7-H STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC Completed 1987 $185,000 1/ -- Indian Bluff, SC Completed 1998 $123,124 2/ -- Drayton Hall, SC Completed 1994 $187,800 3/ -- Pinopolis Dam, SC Completed 1996 $431,040 4/ -- Santee Dam, SC Completed 1996 $418,237 5/ -- SC DOT Bridges, SC Completed 1998 $163,423 6/ -- 1 100% Federal cost 2 Excludes $41,032 contributed funds 3 Excludes $62,574 contributed funds 4 Excludes $143,747 contributed funds 5 Excludes $139,880 contributed funds 6 Excludes $54,467 contributed funds 7-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 7-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 31 of Text) ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS NAVIGATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 110) Charleston Harbor (Deepening/Widening) $ 71 SHORELINE PROTECTION (CATEGORY 130) Pawleys Island $ 60,799 SPECIAL STUDIES (CATEGORY 140) Charleston Estuary $ 32,674 Yadkin-Pee Dee Rivers Watershed, SC 140,965 COMPREHENSIVE STUDIES (CATEGORY 150) Santee, Cooper, & Congaree Rivers $ 46,269 REVIEW OF AUTHORIZED PROJECT (CATEGORY 160) AIWW, SC $ 517,905 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations $ 31,592 FERC Licensing Activities 0 Interagency Water Resources Development 12,992 North American Waterfowl 0 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Cooperation With Other Water Resource Agencies $ 4,385 Planning Assistance to States 13,426 PAS-SC-Upper Santee Aquatic Weed 15,933 PAS-SC-North Charleston Storm Water Management 28,182 PAS-SC-South Carolina DNR Aerial Photo 446 PAS-SC-Jasper County 1,105 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $ 906,743 FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) National Flood Proofing Committee $ 10,321 Flood Plain Management Services 41,251 Technical Services 135,009 Quick Responses 4,968 SAC HES Restudy 9,230 SS-Greenville County, SC 13,753 SS-Richland County, SC 40,160 SS-Riverine Model 38,995 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies 2,251 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $ 295,939 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,202,682 7-24 TABLE 7-J CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization Studies (See Section 21 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Black River, Bishopville, SC 205 $ 126 Brushy Creek, Greenville, SC 205 44,547 Camp Branch, Lake City, SC 205 6.984 Coordination Account 205 1,571 Cow Castle, SC 205 6,497 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, SC 205 29,766 Gilder Creek, Greenville County, SC 205 16,287 Goose Creek, SC 205 3,194 Johnson's Branch, Willamsburg County, SC 205 58,753 Rocky Branch, Greenville County, SC 205 63,304 Shadowmoss Creek, Charleston, SC 205 6,541 St. Andrews Canal, Charleston County, SC 205 40,374 Turkey Creek, Berkeley County, SC 205 70,472 TABLE 7-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS (See Section 19 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Battery Pringle, SC August 1999 Garden City/Surfside Reach, My May 1999 Kingstree Branch, SC August 1999 Myrtle Beach, SC May 1999 North Myrtle Beach, SC May 1999 Scotts Creek, SC September 1999 Socastee Creek, SC May 1999 OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 7-L ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Murphy Island, SC (Section 1135) Completed 1998 $241,723 1/-- 1 Excludes $33,631 Contributed Funds and $100,277 for work-in-kind credit 7-25 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ........ . 8-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL .................... 8-2 3. Brunswick Harbor, GA ....... 8-3 4. Savannah Harbor, GA ........ 8-4 5. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA .............. 8-6 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................. 8-6 7. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. 8-6 8. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.............. .8-6 Beach Erosion Control 9. Tybee Island, GA ........... 10. Beach Erosion Control Activities Under Special Authorization . . . Flood Control 11. Savannah River Basin at Oates Creek, GA ........... 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............ 13. Other Authorized Flood Control Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC .................... 8-9 19. J. Storm Thurmond Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) .................... 8-9 20. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC ................. 8-10 21. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) ..... .8-10 General Investigations 22. Planning Assistance to States.. 8-11 23. Surveys ................. 8-11 24. Collection and Study of Basic Data....................8-11 8-6 25. Research and Development . . . 8-11 8-8 Miscellaneous 26. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency .......... 27. National Emergency Preparedness ........ 28. Regulatory Functions .. . 8-8 8-8 Projects ................. . 8-8 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....... . 8-8 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 15. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization .............. 8-8 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization.............. 8-8 17. Lower Savannah River Basin Environmental Restoration Study.. 8-8 ..... 8-12 ..... 8-12 ..... 8-12 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... .8-13 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation . . 8-15 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... 8-21 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....... .8-22 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes . 8-23 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting charnels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control of water-hyacinth, lyngbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Juliette, Oliver, Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in Ebenezer Creek. This infestation was also found in Little Ocmulgee and George L. Smith State Parks. A work plan was prepared and submitted but was not funded due to National shortfall of funding. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry. This improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance. The District used Cottrell Engineering Corporation dredges "Richmond" and "Marion" to dredge the waterway during the last quarter of FY 99. The dredges removed 598,474 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,066,827. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay Rivers near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities Program after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the final Environmental Impact Statement 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Total expenditures for the FY amounted to $1,574,274, which included such items as water quality monitoring, project condition surveying, and real estate monitoring. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Section 1135 Study. Savannah District is currently preparing plans and specifications to proceed into construction for an Environmental Restoration project in the Latham River in order to improve water quality. 3. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Company wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Company; 30 feet deep and 400 feet in South Brunswick River; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modem docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1990). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance. The District used Marinex Construction Company Inc. dredge "Arlington" to dredge the East River during the first quarter of FY 99. The dredge removed 496,809 cubic yards of material at a cost of $678,495. The District used Manson Construction & Engineering Company during the second quarter in FY 99 to dredge the Bar Channel using the dredge "Newport". The dredge removed 894,283 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,258,822. The District used Malphrus Construction Company, Inc. to raise the dikes on Andrews Island Disposal Area at a cost of $1,155,310. The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY 99 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel and FY 99 East River contracts. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $6,302,619, which included such items as water quality monitoring, project condition surveying, and cultural resources monitoring. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the FY. Total cost for existing completed project to September 30, 1999, is $105,558,976. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $1,185,104. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Feasibility Study: Savannah District has prepared a Feasibility Report with the Georgia Ports Authority recommending deepening the harbor to 36 feet. The report was authorized in the 1999 Water Resource Development Act. Preconstruction Engineering and Design: We are currently preparing plans and specifications to proceed into the construction phase. 8-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 4. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 44 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles long; 42 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings island Turning Basin 42 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. The tide gate structure across Back River was taken out of operation as of March 1991 to decrease salinity levels in the wildlife refuge. The drainage canal across Argyle Island, which was part of the original tide gate project, was closed as of April 1992 by the New Cut closure contract done by a Section 1135 program. The cost of this contract was $1,531,847. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. However, one of the upstream disposal areas will be filled to capacity in 1999. The local sponsor has been notified that a new disposal area may be needed to restore lost capacity. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depth ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1990. Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project was awarded on 28 September 1990 for $7,735,512. The scope of work included widening of 5.6 miles of channel from 400 to 500 feet with 1.8 million cubic yards of material dredged after demolition and removal of structures in the riverbank. Chatham County, the local assurer, completed real estate acquisition prior to award expending $3,688,000 in providing LERRD's, as required by the LCA. The total Federal Cost exclusive of contract claims and additional real estate costs was $8,270,000 and the Non-Federal cost was $6,441,000. Savannah Harbor Deepening. The Savannah Harbor Deepening project was authorized by WRDA 92 on October 31, 1992. The LCA was signed with the local sponsor, the Georgia Ports Authority, on March 2, 1993. Because Federal appropriations would be no earlier than FY 95, the LCA was written and negotiated to allow 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT the local sponsor to up-front the construction funds upon project authorization and the signing of the LCA. The first phase contracts for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project was awarded in March 1993 for the outer bar channel from Station 0+000 to -60 +000 and the lower inner harbor channel from Station 0 +000 to 70 +000 for $7,298,876 and $8,748,883, respectively. The second phase, that requiring significant real estate acquisition, was awarded in July 1993 from Station 70+000 to 103+000, for $4,675,376. The total project scope entails the deepening of the harbor by 4 feet, from -38 ft mlw to -42 ft mlw in the inner harbor and from -40 ft mlw to -44 ft mlw in the bar channel, for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvement. Construction was initiated with the Inner Harbor contract (0 + 000 to 70+000) on May 1, 1993, and was completed on April 21, 1994. The authorized cost for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project is $50,050,000. The current estimated cost for the project is $28,107,635. In the FY 95 appropriations bill, Congress provided $11,585,000 as reimbursement to the local sponsor for the Federal share of the NED plan. The appropriations bill also provided the $2,083,000 of those funds be provided for the cost shared Savannah Riverwalk Extension. The PCA for the Savannah Riverwalk Extension Project was executed on July 21, 1995. The final cost estimate for the project is $3,532,499, of which the Federal share is fixed at $2,083,000 and the City of Savannah's share is $1,449,499. Work was completed as scheduled on May 24,1996 and a dedication ceremony took place on June 10, 1996. In November 1996, the Georgia Ports Authority received $7,500,000 towards their reimbursement of the Federal share of the project and the balance of the Federal share of $1,500,000 has been forwarded now that all the contracts have been closed out and the final audits completed. Savannah Harbor Expansion. The Georgia Ports Authority completed the Feasibility Study and Tier I Environment Impact Statement (EIS) for the Savannah Harbor Expansion project in August 1998. Based on this study, WRDA 1999, gave a conditional authorization for construction. The conditions are the completion of a Chief's Report by the end of 1999 and the completion of a Tier II EIS and General Reevaluation Report (GRR). In addition, this Tier II EIS and GRR must obtain the approvals from the Secretary of the Army, the Director of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Secretary of Commerce and Interior. The Georgia Ports Authority is currently underway with the additional Environmental Studies as required by the authorization. These studies are scheduled for completion in FY 2003. The authorization calls for the Savannah Harbor to be deepened as much as 6 feet, from the present -42 feet mlw to as deep as -48 feet at a first cost (October 1997 price levels) of $229,527,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance. In the first three quarters, the District dredged from Station 50+000 to 112+500 and Station 0+000b to 14+100b using the Norfolk Dredging Company dredge "Pullen" to remove 2,570,586 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,923,961. In the last quarter, the District dredged the Sediment Basin and Station 0+000 to 50+000 using the Wright Dredging Company dredge "Enterprises" and The M Operating Company dredge "Stuart" to remove 2,953,945 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,997,098. The District used Manson Construction & Engineering Company during the second quarter of FY 99 to dredge the Bar Channel using the dredge "Newport". The dredge removed 507,085 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,432,541. The District prepared Plans and Specifications for the FY 99 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel, Station 50+000 to 112 + 500, and the Sediment Basin and Station 0 +000 to 50 +000 contracts. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $13,091,633 which included such items as water quality monitoring, project condition surveying, and cultural resources monitoring. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the 8-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. 5. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous projects. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 secondfeet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, above the 13th Street Bridge (R.M. 202.6), a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Due to lack of commercial use, the river has not been dredged since FY 79. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. There were no dredging projects during this fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance costs for the amounted to $286,419. (See Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.) FY for Feasibility Study: An Ecosystem Restoration Study was begun in October 1998. The Reconnaissance Study was completed in July 1999 and the Feasibility Study initiated in August 1999. The Feasibility Study is scheduled for completion in August 2002. The study focuses on the issue of dissolved oxygen. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: AIWW Brunswick Harbor Savannah Harbor 7. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 8. NAVIGATION WORK AUTHORIZATION UNDER SPECIAL None were conducted in FY 99. Beach Erosion Control 9. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Numbers 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT about 0.5 miles. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified to call for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rightsof- way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 39.9 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further the construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at end of fiscal year. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987, at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A Beach Monitoring Program was performed for three years to monitor the performance of the design. The Local Sponsor has invested over $200,000 in additional funds for the implementation of a dune building program for the North and South ends of the island. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $513,911. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) A reevaluation study under Section 934 WRDA 86 was initiated in 1990 for the Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project. The purpose of the study was to determine if the authorized Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project should be extended to a project life of 50 years, and determine if the Federal Government should continue to participate in the project. The study used current Federal policy and economic guidelines to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of additional periodic beach nourishment. The study was completed in October 1994. Approval of the report authorized continued Federal participation in the project for the remainder of the project's 50- year life and was approved in June 1995. The District received a total of $5.7 million Federal funds in FY 97, 98 and 99 for construction of the recommended project. The city of Tybee Island, the local sponsor, obtained $3.8 million for project construction. The current total project cost estimate is $9.6 million. A study to determine if the South Tip of the island and the Back River area up to Horse Pen Creek should be added to the authorized project was completed in November 1997 and was approved by Headquarters in August 1998. The project, scheduled for construction in FY 99 and 2000, includes: * Renourish 13,200 feet of oceanfront beach 8-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 between north and south Federal terminal groins to provide minimum 124-foot wide beach at high tide. * Construct rock groin field along 1,800 feet of Back River Beach. * Restore beach along Back River Beach. In September 1999, construction of the Back River Beach groins was initiated. Beach renourishment is scheduled to commence in February 2000 and total project completion is scheduled for May 2000. 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. A report incurring costs during FY 99 was Tybee Island, GA: $65,172. Flood Control 11. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES CREEK, GA Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood water from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The revised FEMA mapping has been prepared in order to reduce the flood insurance costs of the inhabitants of the Oates Creek Basin. The Operation and Maintenance manual was completed in December 1993 and the project was turned over to Richmond County for long term maintenance. For more details, see Annual Report for FY 1995. Based on the Design Deficiency Evaluation Reconnaissance Report, the Oates Creek project will require some repair and improvement work. It is scheduled to start design with FY 2001 funds and construction in FY 2002. Total cost of the repair project is $2,230,000. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for the FY amounted to $122,012. (See Table 8-A&D.) 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These Flood Damage Reduction activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY 99 a total of $72,257 was spent on preauthorization flood damage reduction studies. Study efforts during the FY were as follows: Harmon Canal: $257,532. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 15. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION There were no Section 14 studies during FY 99. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification study efforts during FY 99 were as follows: Latham River/Jekyll Island, GA: $74,532; Ebenezer Creek Swamp, GA: $105,078; and Back River Restoration, GA: $185,073. Preparation of an Environmental Restoration Report on Ebenezer Creek was initiated. Project Modification Report was completed for Latham River/Jekyll Creek to determine environmental benefits. 17. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION STUDY The cost shared Feasibility Phase was initiated June 1993 and completed in March 1996. Recommended plan includes a large partial diversion structure at cut #3, a plug in bend #3 below the mouth of Bear Creek, a realignment and restoration of the mouths of Bear and Mill Creeks, which provides improved flows into 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT both creeks. This is a self sustaining project which would not require O&M dredging. This plan has no impact on navigation. The feasibility phase included a takings analysis which concluded no takings. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) was initiated in April 1996 and was completed in September 1998. The total cost of PED phase is $547,000. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for flood control and other purposes (HD/657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of the Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction by the Flood control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) Duke Power company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jacassee pumpstorage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry-Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. A new authorization for a comprehensive water resources study of the Savannah River Basin was authorized in Section 414 of the WRDA 1996. A Reconnaissance Study was begun under this study in February 1998 and completed in July 1999. A draft Project Study Plan (PSP) to conduct the Feasibility studies was prepared in September 1999 and is being used to negotiate a Feasibility Study Cost Sharing Agreement with the states of Georgia and South Carolina. Local cooperation. None required. 19. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330 msl. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 470,506 megawatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 99 was $29,372,744. Maintenance. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $8,817,216. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY 99 6,859,800 persons visited the facility. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is 8-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 complete except for providing additional recreational development. Major Rehabilitation. The J. Strom Thurmond Powerplant has been included as a project in the Major Rehabilitation Program. An Evaluation Report was approved in July 1994. FY 96 Appropriations were provided in the FY 96 Energy and Water Bill in November 1996. Current estimate is $69,700,000. All eight contracts have been awarded. Current project cost estimate remains at $69,700,000. Project completion date is September 2004. Currently four of the eight contracts have been completed in FY 99 with two more scheduled for completion in FY 2000. Major Rehabilitation costs for the FY amounted to $8,553,066. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 20. HARTWELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Dam and Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 480 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,362 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,852 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet; hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet; dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. Following rehabilitation, the capacity will be 342,000 kilowatts. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 422,000 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Net generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 334,384,100 kilowatt-hours, all of which was marketed by the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 99 is $13,729,334. Maintenance. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $10,079,228. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21, 1978. Approximately 10,129,760 persons visited the lake in FY 99. During FY 96 funds were expended for the E&D phase of the major rehabilitation of the four original units at the Hartwell power facility. Major Rehabilitation. The Hartwell Powerplant Major Rehabilitation project was approved by HQUSACE, and was included in the FY 96 budget. The project scope includes the rewinding of the first four generators, the replacement of the transformers, the refurbishment of the turbine water passageways, and the replacement of key electrical/mechanical peripheral equipment and the replacement/refurbishment of the four older headgates. The fully funded cost for the recommended plan is $24,400,000. All five contracts have been awarded with the first two completed in FY 99. It is currently scheduled for completion in September 2000. Major Rehabilitation costs for the FY amounted to $8,626,374. 21. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (FY 99) cost estimate for the project is $620,000,000 of which $466,969,000 is for construction; $28,857,000 for lands and damages; $4,880,000 for cultural resources; and $124,174,000 for engineering/design, supervision/ administration, and all project studies, including environmental. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT bines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 1986, the District has conducted comprehensive fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District conducted water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydroelectric projects. The results of these study efforts have been used to evaluate the need to develop fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation is presented in a supplement to the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on pumped storage. The Record-of- Decision (ROD) was signed September 1991. Installation of pumped storage is complete; final Phase III environmental testing was completed in October 1996. The Phase III Environmental Report and its Interagency Review was completed in August 1997. The District has completed the NEPA Documentation Phase and has also completed discussions with the resource agencies in attempting to resolve issues. SAS has reached an agreement with SCDNR on operational measures and general mitigation package. The Federal Court injunction is still in place prohibiting commercial operation of pumped storage. The remaining issue was that SC insisted on a consent order for commercial operations. COE could not accept this condition and attempted to resolve this with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) in addition to the NEPA Documentation. SCDNR did not accept the MOA, so pumped storage must now be litigated in U.S. District Court to lift the injunction. All cost shared recreation is complete except for work planned in the McCalla Peninsula with SC in FY 2001 and FY 2002. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Public Law 89-72; 79 stat. 213C (for Legislative history of Act see page 1864). Operations and results during fiscal year. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 319,814 megawatt-hours. Maintenance. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $5,833,984. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) These funds were for management of lake and power activities. (See Table 8 for Cost and Financial Statement.) Approximately 1,093,356 persons visited the lake in FY 99. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 97 percent complete. Total cost of project to September 30, 1999, is $695,608,197. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $2,063,168. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) General Investigations 22. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES Planning Assistance to States activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 22, Water Resources Development Act of 1974, as amended. During FY 99, a total of $62,514 was expended. 23. SURVEYS During FY 99, costs of $460,532 were incurred as follows: Navigation Studies: $103,440; Flood Damage Prevention Studies: $70,545; Special Studies: $2,742; and Miscellaneous Activities: $93,088. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During FY 99, under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, flood hazard related information and assistance were provided to state and local governments on a nonreimbursable basis and to other Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Expenditures were as follows: Flood Plain Management Services: $90,365; Technical Services: $110,219; Quick Responses: $4,973; for five Special Studies: $70,237; Georgia HES Restudy: $59,970; and Hydrologic Studies: $3,833. 25. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during FY 99. 8-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Miscellaneous 26. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCY Disaster Preparedness Program $ 372,018 Emergency Operations (Code 200) ACI Purchase/Haul & Install Manufactured Mobile Homes 3.200 Advance Temp Housing Planning 5,600 Hurricane Dennis 3,500 Hurricane Georges 50,000 Hurricane Floyd 57,100 Emergency Work for Others: Del Rio Flood 5,000 South Dakota Temp Housing 2,200 Update Temp Housing Mission Guide 4,200 ACI Emergency Power 25,500 Hurricane Georges 1,735,500 Hurricane Floyd 5,000 TOTAL FC&CE $2,268,318 27. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS/ CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness $56,436 28. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Other Navigation Regulations EIS TOTAL Regulatory Functions $2,126,300 598,800 0 20,000 10,200 $2,755,300 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to In Text Project Funding FY-96 FY-97 FY-98 FY-99 Sep 30, 1999 1. 2. 3. 4. 40,114 1,040,159 20,111 1,003,961 1,659,000 942,000 1,569,739 1,041,826 300,000 302,000 243,993 243,993 3,475,000 3,384,000 3,398,544 3,458,485 -- 302,000 227,404 355,081 Aquatic Plant Con- New Work: trol (1965 R&H Approp. Act) Cost Atlantic Intra- New Work: coastal Waterway Approp. between Norfolk, Cost VA, and the St. Maint: Johns River, FL Approp. Cost Brunswick Harbor, New Work: GA Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. Cost Savannah Harbor, New Work: GA Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. Cost Savannah River New Work: below Augusta, Approp. GA Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Tybee Island, GA New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. Cost Savannah River New Work: Basin at Oates Approp. Creek, GA Cost (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. Cost 273,000 160,068 11,478,000 11,580,374 -65,951 5,988 2,392,000 2,574,000 1,677,663 2,599,254 -- 966,000 2,858 353,876 1,631,000 1,629,109 106,000 134,144 3,975,000 2,814,984 88,000 154,586 14,000 156,232 14,458,000 14,448,990 553,000 1,125,318 2.000,000 513,911 488 1,641,000 1,574,274 600,000 1,185,267 6,193,000 6,302,619 958,096(1) 958,096(1) 34,311,507(2) 34,237,500(2) 6,028,608(3) 6,870,219(3) 99,883,928(4) 98,688,757(4) 2,876 100,000 103,276 13,047,000 13,091,633 2,984,915 42,375 194,000 286,419 2,734,000 407,159 3,100,000 77,015 67,464,721(5) 66,731,510(5) 252,144,693(6) 252,282,690(6) 27,666,947 23,471,894 6,790,031(7) 6,790,031(7) 24,874,771 24,818,591 10,385,249(8) 5,959,748(8) 3,120,430 97,445 9,173,000 9,159,144 296,534 30,706 296,534 8-13 566,000 2,264,033 14,333,000 14,092,569 -263,694 1,897,773 5. 9. 11. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to In Text Project Funding FY-96 FY-97 FY-98 FY-99 Sep 30, 1999 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 19. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) 20. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC 21. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) (Contributed Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 30,000 119,000 139,000 28,581 83,590 118,068 70,000 122,012 798,064 793,052 -- -- -- -- 84,880,940(9) -- -- -- -- 84,876,004(9) 7,960,100 9,073,000 9,199,000 9,610,000 177,790,345(10) 7,901,320 9,087,385 8,692,823 8,817,216 176,077,911(10) 690,000 4,155,000 6,330,000 6,100,000 17,275,000 635,847 3,241,306 2,511,084 8,553,066 14,941,303 -- 115,874,985(11,12) -- 115,876,925(11,12) 9,065,000 10,004,000 9,874,000 9,957,000 8,769,746 9,597,029 9,891,592 10,079,228 908,000 5,425,000 7,067,000 6,786,000 782,684 4,528,120 4,541,634 8,626,374 11,103,000 5,395,000 3,757,000 1,667,000 12,257,080 5,425,293 3,622,062 2,063,168 6,916,000 6,448,000 6,304,000 6,050,000 6,344,213 6,763,933 5,823,005 5,833,984 171,556,627(13) 171,633,709(13) 26,852,950 25,119,348 622,708,000 621,296,804 66,124,991 74,311,393 73,341 73,605 1. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 2. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FY's 86 and 87. 3. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 4. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 5. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 6. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $62,727 contributed funds. 7. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 8. Does not include $61,856.45 contributed funds. 9. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 10. Includes $576,665 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 11. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $ 4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 has been expended and $545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $797,558 expended special recreation use fees. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct 27, 1965 Section 302 Jun 3, 1896 Mar 3, 1899 Jul 13, 1892 Mar 3, 1905 Jul 25, 1912 Aug 8, 1917 Mar 2, 1919 Mar 2, 1919 Mar 3, 1925 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 2, 1945 Oct 15, 1981 1. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT 1962) Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC to Cumberland Sound GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. Navigation Project. 8-15 HD251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD295, 53d, Cong., 3d sess. HD41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD1236, 60th Cong., 2d sess. HD581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. SD178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645, as amended. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar 3, 1879 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jul 3, 1930 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 22, 1976 Jul 14, 1981 Jul 13, 1983 Oct 17, 1986 3. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Enlargement of the maneuvering area of the entrance to East River and dredging Brunswick and Turtle Rivers to obtain depths authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of May 17, 1950. Enlargement of the East River Turning Basin to a length of 1,000 feet and a width of 750 feet. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. 8-16 Annual Report, 1980, p.959. HD407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD393, 64th Cong., 1st sess. SD57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. HD690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HD177, 97th Cong., 1st sess. PL 98-360 HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess., Section 846 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar 2, 1907 Jun 25, 1910 Jul 25, 1912 Aug 8, 1917 Jan 21, 1927 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Nov 7, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 4. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at at upper end. 8-17 HD181, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD563, 62d, Cong., 2d sess. HD1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. HD261,69th Cong., 1st sess. HD262,69th Cong., 1st sess. SD39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. HD276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD283, 76th Cong., 1st sess. HD227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. HD678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep 3, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 27, 1965 Oct 27, 1965 SPWC Resolution Jun 15, 1976 and HPWC, Jun 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201, Flood Control Act of 1965 Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp., from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 38 feet. HD110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD115, 87th Cong., 1st sess. HD226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. 8-18 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul 16,1984 Oct 17, 1986 Oct 31, 1992 5. Sep 13, 1891 Jun 25, 1910 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 9. SPWC Resolution Jun 22, 1971 and HPWC, Jun 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201, Flood Control Act of 1965 Oct 17, 1986 PL-104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Oct 12, 1996 Construction of three new work curve wideners in PL 98-360 the inner harbor channel. Curve Widener #1 is between mile 11.1 and 11.9. Curve widener #2 is between mile 13.2 and 13.8 and curve widener #3 is between mile 14.0 and 14.8. The Wideners are located on the north side of the channel. Savannah Harbor Widening as described in Report HD6, 99th of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19, 1978. Widen Dated Oct. channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings 201 Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove Section 86 drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. Savannah Harbor Deepening deepened harbor from WRDA 199 -38 feet to -42 feet mlw in Inner Harbor and from - 40 feet to -44 feet mlw in the Bar Channel for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvements. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 to 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. Sect 301(b)(4) provided for inclusion of that portion of Tybee Island located south of the existing terminal groin, including the East Bank of Tybee Creek up to Horse Pen Creek. Sect 506(a)(4) extended periodic nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. Cong., 2d sess. 17, 1986, Section 7 2 HD255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. HD962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. HD101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Com., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD105, 92d Cong. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 867 WRDA 1996 WRDA 1996 8-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Oct 17, 1986 17. PL-104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Oct 12, 1996 19. Flood Control Act of Dec 22, 1944 Oct 17, 1986 Jan 1988 20. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950 OATES CREEK, GA Provided for construction of the Oates Creek Project. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA & SC Project for the environmental restoration of the Lower Savannah River Basin; modification to cut off Bend No. 3 and improve the mouths of Bear Creek and Mill Creek. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA&SC Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake.) HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Flood Control Act Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Proof Jul 3, 1958 ject. Water Resources Development Act of 1976 21. Flood Control Act of Nov 7, 1966 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 401 HD105-173, 105th Congress, 2nd Session, Jan 27, 1998 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864, HJR 376 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL516, 82st Cong., 2d sess. PL85-500, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL94-587, Sec. 182b., 85th Cong. SD52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 601 8-20 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 7 in text) Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance BelIville Point, GA Cedar Point, GA Darien Harbor, GA Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2, 3 Satilla River, GA 1, 5, 6 Savannah River above Augusta, GA 2, 3, 4 Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2,3, 5 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed See Notes See Notes 1986 1982 1975 1935 1951 1929 1951 1929 1929 599,379 656,233 199,723 8,000 15,688 17,906 9,452 69,600 200,556 185,433 7,200 69,936 19,594 57,172 85,944 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in HD 467, 69th Cong., 1st session. 3. No commerce reported. 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 13 in text) Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (1) Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Macon, GA Oates Creek, GA (2) Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed See Note Completed Completed Completed Completed 1941 1974 1977 1955 1993 1976 $ 643,016 132,640 380,043 12,565,000 582,163 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated October 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 8-22 $38,242 5,219 38,243 5,219 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 19, 20, & 21 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Lake, GA and SC Hartwell Dam & Lake, GA and SC Richard B. Russell Dam & Lake, GA and SC(4)(5) Savannah $79,156,000(3) Savannah Savannah 89,240,000 618,100,000 $79,1 56,000(1,3) 89,240,000(2) 618,100,000 Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) Approved August 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) Approved July 1954. Excludes Code 710 funds. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) replaced Goat Island, GA and SC and Middleton Shoals, GA and SC. 8-23 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT * JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the north-eastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ........... 3 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR ............................................... 3 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL .................... 3 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ..................................... 4 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ............................................ 4 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass ............... 5 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL .............................................. 5 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ............................... .... 6 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL ........................................... 6 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL ......................................... 6 11. Fort Myers Beach, FL ........................................... 7 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL .......................................... 7 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL .................................... 8 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to M iam i, FL .................................... ......................... 8 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL ........................................ 9 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL ................. 10 17. John's Pass, FL .................................................. 11 18. Longboat Pass, FL .............................................. 11 19. Manatee Harbor, FL ............................................ 11 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR ........................................ 12 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL ........................................ 12 22. Miami Harbor..................................................... 12 23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL ....................................... 13 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL ................................. 13 25. Oklawaha River, FL.............................................. 14 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL ...................................... 15 27. Palm Valley Bridge, FL.......................................15 28. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL ...................................... 16 29. Ponce Harbor, PR ............................................... 16 30. Port Everglades Harbor, FL ................................ 17 31. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida ............................. 17 32. St. Augustine Harbor, FL .................................... 18 33. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake H arney, FL ....................................................... 18 34. St. Lucie Inlet, FL ............................................... 19 35. San Juan Harbor, PR ............................................ 20 36. Tampa Harbor, FL .............................................. 20 Navigation (cont.) 37. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ..................................................... 22 38. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 22 39. Navigation Work under Special A uthorization .................................................... 22 Beach Erosion Control 40. Brevard County, FL ............................................. 22 41. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project .......... 23 42. Duval County, FL ............................................... 23 43. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL ............................................. 24 44. Indian River County, FL ..................................... 24 45. Lee County, FL.................................................. 25 46. Manatee County, FL............................................. 25 47. M artin County, FL................................................ 26 48. N assau County, FL.............................................. 26 49. Palm Beach County, FL ...................................... 27 50. Palm Beach Island, FL ......................................... 28 51. Pinellas County, FL ............................................. 28 52. St. Johns County, FL ............................................ 29 53. Sarasota County, FL ............................................ 29 54. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................................................. 30 55. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ........................................... 30 Flood Control 56. Central and Southern Florida .............................. 30 57. Dade County, FL ................................................ 32 58. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL ........... 33 59. Four River Basins, FL ......................................... 33 60. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ....................... 34 61. Rio De La Plata, PR............................................. 34 62. Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR .......................................... 35 63. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................................................ 35 64. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 36 65. Flood Control Work under Special A uthorization ..................................................... 36 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 General Investigations 66. Surveys ............................................................... 36 67. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 36 68. Continuation of Planning and Engineering..........36 69. Advance Engineering and Design ........................ 36 General Regulatory 70. Perm it Evaluation.................................................36 71. Enforcem ent ....................................................... 37 72. Studies ...................................... .......................... 37 Project Modifications 73. Kissimmee River Restoration ............................. 37 74. Everglades South Florida Ecosystem Restoration ............................................................ 38 75. Restoration Work under Special Authorization.........................................39 76. Wetland and Other Aquatic Habitat Creation under Special Authorization ................ 39 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H 251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs incurred was $9,919. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress; water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet and a 300 by 100-foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Locks and dams cost was $21,700. Operation of flood control structures was $17,300. Real estate management cost was $140,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Femrnandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of flood control structures cost was $18,400. Real estate management cost was $26,900. Project operations cost was $-100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL Location. The inlet connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway and a marina basin 8 by 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results duringfiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-I for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost for Canaveral Harbor Deepening project is $6,600,000 Federal and $3,100,000 non-Federal and project cost for Canaveral Harbor Sand Transfer System is $133,750,000 Federal and $4,950,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $2,567,441. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 1,413,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 189 acres. Three-cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34- foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45-ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the nearest dry-dock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Canaveral Harbor: Real estate cost was $-8,826. Channel and canal cost was $-7,443. Reconnaissance cost was $- 13,873. Feasibility cost was $-999. Miscellaneous activities cost was $-1,105. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $338,149 and $26,234 respectively. HTRW cost was $-12,029. Canaveral Harbor Deepening: Channel and canal cost 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT was $136,080. Navigation port and harbor cost was $1,056,296. Engineering and design cost was $110,805. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks and dams amounted to $448,400 for the fiscal year. Operation of service utilities costs $-7,000. Maintenance of service utilities cost was $10,900. Recreation management cost was $3,500. Real estate management was $3,818,000. Engineering and design and construction management cost $-700 and $-100 respectively. Credits amounted to $16,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Sand bypass and north jetty temporary sand tightening were completed in FY 98. South jetty repair is scheduled for award in January 2000 and completion in September 2000. Widening and deepening completed in FY 1995. Entrance channel widener to be constructed. Severe erosion of the northbank has resulted from harbor improvements. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1-mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood-packing houses; 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end offiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $6,500. Operation of service facilities cost was $15,000. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $62,300. Water quality control cost was $21,300. Lands and damages cost was $1,000. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $1,612,700. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $214,100 and $455,000 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $15,563 was expended from 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-J for Locks and Dams.) WRDA 92 authorizes and directs ASA (CW) to offer to enter into a contract to operate and maintain the project at a level necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $5,500. Condition and operation study cost was $-300. Real estate management cost was $1,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. Project was deauthorized in Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and $5,000,000 of prior appropriations was withdrawn. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 by 600-foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT feet long. The project is 7 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $935,000. Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs cost was $6,900. Operation of flood control structures $5,000. Natural resource management cost was $46,000. Real estate management cost was $1,664,600. Bank stabilization cost was $24,600. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $300. Engineering and design cost was $-5,000. Credits totaled $2,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. Authorized depths were restored as of March 1991. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $11,300. Operation of service facilities cost was $100. Condition and operation studies cost was $900. Water control cost was $300. Real estate management cost was $106,900. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $1,400. Engineering and design cost was $200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Station 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30+00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Plan of improvement consists of enlarging the existing entrance channel to 400 feet wide and 30 feet deep, the interior channel to 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep, the existing turning basin to 1,100 feet square and 28 feet deep, and providing an access channel 1,250 feet long, 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep north of the main turning basin. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,503,387. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit-packing house. Railway and both piers serve the north pier by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams and reservoirs cost was $14,300. Operation of service facilities cost was $24,200. Natural resource management cost was $200. Real estate management cost was $53,000. General regulatory functions cost was $5,200. Engineering and design cost was $-500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mitigation contract completed in May 1996. No further work is scheduled. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical ChartNos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Casey's Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are 6 wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $29,400. Operation of power plants cost was $200. Real estate management costs was $304,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Casey's Pass was completed in 1983. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $327,900. Operation of service facilities was $1,600. Operation of flood control structures cost was $34,600. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $18,200. Water quality control cost was $-200. Real estate management cost $4,609,300. National emergency preparedness cost was $300. Maintenance of roads, railroads and bridges cost $-1,700. Bank stabilization cost was $-500. Engineering and design and construction management cost $3,500 and $-500 respectively. Credits were $37,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete. (Construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River, which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly comrner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point-Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 by 200 feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport turning basin; also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work $10,500,000 Federal and $19,500,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $927,654. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Dry-dock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Dredged Material Disposal contract cost was $1,604,735. Maintenance: Operation of flood control structures cost was $18,400. Real estate management cost $3,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. DE's notice executed September 1998. Chief's report approved March 1999. PED is scheduled for completion in May 2000. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. Existing project. The authorized project provides improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -12 feet MSL; and installing flow diversion features at the west and east ends of the cove. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in 1990. 17. JOHNS PASS, FL Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by the Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin, which extends from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basin. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work $25,200,000 Federal and $12,300,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,586,943. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track, which connects with the CSX Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was $931. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $-1,224. Reconnaissance cost was $167. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $104,532 and $418 respectively. HTRW cost was $431. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $2,509,900. Operation of flood control structures cost $100. Real estate management cost $1,667,800. National emergency management cost was $500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been delayed due to environmental impacts, which necessitate difficult mitigation requirements regarding seagrasses. Award of Phase II (wideners, turning basin, and mitigation) are scheduled for December 2000 and completion in December 2001. The GRR to reconfigure the turning basin is scheduled for completion in March 2000. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000-foot approach channel to the deep-water terminal, decreasing to a 500-foot width opposite the westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to the easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone jetties at the entrance; and a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet 5.5 miles inland. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 13 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. Estimated cost for Miami Harbor Channel is $49,200,000 Federal cost and $37,700,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage of 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Dry-dock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Navigation ports and harbors cost was $936,129. Engineering and design cost $281,368. Construction management cost was $49,465. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $21,300. Operation of service utilities cost was $200. Operation of flood control structures cost $11,500. Natural resource management cost $600. Real estate management cost was $79,600. Engineering and design cost $10,200. Credits totaled $200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract I has been completed. Contract II is underway but project depth has not been achieved to date due to hard rock. Dredging is scheduled for completion December 2001. GRR to investigate additional deepening is underway. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $400. Operation of service utilities cost $100. Real estate management cost was $300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. Authorized project depths were restored as of April 1991. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80-100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, near Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River, St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9- L for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (The 8 foot depth basin at Stuart was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles upstream from Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management cost $15,900. Channel and canal maintenance cost $-400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (A 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs Run was deauthorized.) The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet of storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or dry-dock facilities located at the port. A 100-ton vertical boatlift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation for locks and dams cost was $24,300. Operation of service utilities cost $900. Operation of flood control structure cost $1,200. Natural resource management cost was $-1,400. Condition, operation and environmental studies for the project totaled $57,300. Water quality control cost was $300. Real estate management cost was $1,600,300. National emergency management cost $36,200. Land and damages cost was $- 100. Engineering and design cost $-11,600. Credits totaled $19,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. Maintenance dredging was completed May 1996. Future maintenance dredging will occur yearly as necessary depending on shoaling conditions. 27. PALM VALLEY BRIDGE, FL Location. Palm Valley Bridge is located over the Intracoastal Waterway on State Road 210 in St. John's County, Florida. Existing project. The project provides for the replacement of the existing Palm Valley Bridge with a new high level bridge that is fixed for navigation. Additional roadway construction will be required because of the new bridge alignment. The old bridge will be removed and the Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of the old bridge will be dredged to its authorized dimensions. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation). Estimated cost is $18,700,000 Federal and $7,200,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Operations and maintenance at an estimated $75,000 per year. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: Real estate cost was $76,285. Navigation cost was $-55,411. Feasibility cost was $-25. Engineering and design cost was $244,163. 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Condition at end of fiscal year. Local sponsor is funding expansion from 2 to 4 lanes. PCA executed in December 1999. Real estate acquisition is underway and is scheduled for completion in June 2000. Construction contract award anticipated for September 2000. The County Commissioners have approved a betterment to a 4-lane bridge. 28. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. the project is about 5 miles long. Estimated cost for new work is $3,200,000 Federal and $2,600,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance Operation of locks and dams cost was $10,000. Operation of flood control structures cost $24,200. Operation and condition surveys cost was $28,500. Water quality control cost was $1,500. Real estate management cost was $1,144,800. Bank stabilization cost $10,000. Engineering and design cost $-500. Construction management cost was $-400. Credits totaled $2,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Maintenance is required on the North Jetty. PED is scheduled for completion July 2000. Pending construction new start. 29. PONCE HARBOR, PR Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40-ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 30. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Dry-dock facilities include 2 dry-docks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boatlift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of locks and dams cost was $-100. Operation of service utilities cost $2,100. Operation of flood control structures cost $16,100. Condition survey cost was $14,300. Water quality control cost was $800. Real estate management cost $32,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in H 144/93/1. 31. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-M for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 24,556 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth and/or water lettuce) and 2,136 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed is under maintenance control. 32. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin; future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock, which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River, which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service utilities cost was $3,300. Real estate management cost was $52,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the North Jetty, which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet, which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Maintenance dredging at the entrance channel was completed June 1996. 33. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 1946 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project, as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 34. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot on the landside of the inlet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work $18,400,000 Federal and $6,100,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each 5 years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,743,199. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas, which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service utilities cost $9,300. Real estate management cost $79,600. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $-99,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in HD 294/93/1. Authorized project depths were restored as of July 1991. Maintenance dredging was completed June 1996. Improvements to the inlet were authorized in 1974. Due to limited funding during construction, the south jetty was completed 1,000 feet short of the authorized length; the impoundment basin was not constructed to design capacity as a shallow subsurface rock was encountered. Sufficient commercial benefits were identified in the economic update study to reclassify the inlet from a predominately recreational usage inlet to a commercial usage inlet. Preconstruction, engineering, and design is scheduled for completion in December 1999. A section 221 agreement was signed for the initial construction and the locals will use this as authority to 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 initiate land acquisition. A supplemental agreement may be required. Contract award is scheduled for March 2000 and completion November 2000. 35. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, and 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work $24,100,000 Federal and $10,300,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,100,000. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and L lkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for handling loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 was repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was $-48,170. Reservoir cost was $-78,696. Channels and canal cost was $1,521. Navigation ports and harbors cost was $5,894,666. Reconnaissance cost was $-1,604. Feasibility cost was $234. Engineering and design cost was $810,963. Construction management cost was $192,221. HTRW cost was $1,365. Maintenance: Project condition survey cost $10,500. Real estate management cost $906,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The PED phase was completed in September 1995. Revisions to the plans and specifications were accomplished in FY 97. Execution of PCA was completed June 1998. Authorized in WRDA 1996. Contract I completed September 1999. Contract II awarded September 1999. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal, which cost $1,543,712 (this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in Table 9-A costs). 36. TAMPA HARBOR, FL Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 by 200 foot Port Sutton Terminal Channel 3,700 feet long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in East Bay Channel. (The 46-foot and 44 foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for Big Bend Channel $7,900,000 Federal and $5,700,000 non-Federal. Estimated cost for Ybor Channel $46,700,000 Federal and $24,800,000 non- Federal. For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and H 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,853,161. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is required from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000- bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000-bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The CSX Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Port Sutton: Real estate cost was $-27,457. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $-994. Reconnaissance cost was $-762. Feasibility cost was $-381. Engineering and design cost was $92,160. East Bay Channel: Channel and canal cost was $-2,444. Navigation port and harbor cost was $3,647. Reconnaissance cost was $7,772. Feasibility cost was $2,310. General regulatory cost was $128. Engineering and design cost was $173,633. Supervision and administration cost was $-10,403. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $369,500. Operation of service utilities cost $900. Operation of flood control structures cost $200. Natural resource management cost $52,900. Water quality control costs was $300. Real estate management cost was $2,750,900. National emergency operations cost was $29,100. Bank stabilization cost was $500. Channel and canal 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 maintenance cost was $-900. Engineering and design cost $500. Credits totaled 28,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Big Bend Channel Chiefs report signed in October 1998. Plans and specifications are scheduled for completion in September 2000. PCA scheduled for execution October 2000. Ybor Channel LRR is awaiting approval. 37. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. Total cost was $848,841. 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-C.) 39. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Section 107 Coordination Account, $4,351; Island of Vieques, PR $11,685; Aguadilla Harbor, PR $1,496; Fernandina Harbor, FL $-178; Salt Run, St. Augustine, FL, $4,421; Hemrnando Beach Channel, FL $86,528; Canaveral Harbor (West Turning Basin), FL $8,927. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Mitigation of shore damages attributed to navigation projects (Sec 111). Stohl Road, Aguadilla Harbor, PR $34,896. Beach Erosion Control 40. BREVARD COUNTY, FL Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for new work $21,479,000 Federal and $19,141,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,462,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $3,384. Beach renourishment cost was $4,793. Reconnaissance cost was $4,468. Feasibility cost was $32,455. Engineering and design cost was $110,402. Condition at end of fiscal year. Feasibility report was completed in September 1996, approved in December 1996, and authorized by Section 101(b) of WRDA 1996. 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT PED completed in September 1999. Negotiating PCA and contract scheduled for award September 2000. 41. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water; a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work is $89,200,000 Federal and $78,000,000 non- Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $3,460,990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $866. Beach renourishment cost was $131. Feasibility cost was $-1,786. Engineering and design cost $100,306. Condition at end of fiscal year. The sponsor is conducting engineering and design for preparation of a GRR for renourishment of Segments II and III. The sponsor intends to complete a GRR and NEPA document to support execution of a PCA for reimbursement of the Federal share of engineering and design and renourishment in October 2001. 42. DUVAL COUNTY, FL Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work $111,200,000 Federal and $72,900,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United states free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $16,895,567. 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $-197. Renourishment cost was $-974. Reconnaissance cost was $-14,474. Engineering and design cost was $228,302. Condition at end offiscal year. Engineering and design is underway for next renourishment contract, which is scheduled for award in November 2000. 43. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL Location. Fort Pierce Beach Erosion Control Project extends 1.3 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet, on the east coast of Florida about 120 miles north of Miami. Existing project. The project fill was initially completed by local interests in 1971, using offshore borrow material. Prior to the nourishment, severe shorefront recession had destroyed a private residence and threatened other residences and a state road. Local interests were reimbursed the federal share of the initial project construction cost. Federal participation in renourishment was authorized for an initial 10-year period and subsequently extended five years under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers until 1985. The project is also periodically nourished with suitable material obtained from operational maintenance of the nearby Fort Pierce Harbor federal navigation project. The project was renourished in the summer of 1980. A Section 111 project authorized in 1982 provides that 60 percent of the cost of material required to nourish 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet should be reallocated to the navigation project. A reevaluation report is being conducted to determine whether extension of federal participation in cost sharing to 50 years is warranted. Estimated cost is $28,000,000 Federal and $12,600,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $4,623,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $-42,961. Renourishment cost was $5,994,677. Reconnaissance cost was $-13,577. Feasibility cost was $-1,983. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $539,546 and $210,851 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Section 934 report recommending extension of Federal participation was approved in June 1995 by ASA (CW). Renourishment contract has been suspended due to a lawsuit over environmental concerns in the borrow area. Preparation of P&S for mitigation requirements underway. GRR for the additional mile undergoing higher authority review and approval. 44. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 percent of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20-foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10-year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment would be required at 5-year intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain as necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment's for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non-Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $12,785. Renourishment cost was $10,410. Feasibility cost was $34,552. Engineering and design cost was $16,834. Condition at end of fiscal year. No work is currently scheduled. 45. LEE COUNTY, FL Location. Lee County is on the lower Gulf coast of Florida, about 90 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 130 miles north of Key West. Existing project. The project provides for the Federal participation in restoration and protection of Lee County, Florida, as follows: On Gasparilla Island, restore beach along 2.7 miles of shore and provide revetment along 2,400 feet of shore and a 500-foot terminal groin; on Captiva Island, restore beach along 4.7 miles of shore; and on Estero Island, restore beach along 4.6 and provide a 5-year advance supply of beach nourishment material and periodic nourishment of the restored beaches, as needed, with Federal aid for nourishment limited to the first 10 years of project life after completion of the initial fill placement on each island. Estimated cost is $8,900,000 Federal cost and $35,600,000 non-Federal cost. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interest must: contribute in cash) including contract price, engineering and design, and supervision and administration) 65.8 percent of first cost at Gasparilla Island, 91.3 percent of first cost at Captiva Island, and 87.5 percent of first coast at Estero Island; contribute toward beach nourishment for the first 10 years of project life, 95.5 percent for Gasparilla Island; 91.3 percent for Captiva Island, and 96.9 percent for Estero Island; and contribute 50.9 percent of the annual maintenance costs of the terminal groin on Estero Island; provide after 10 years of project life periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; provide lands, easements, rightsof- way, and relocations; assure continued public ownership for public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; save the United States free from damages; and provide an adequate width of beach with acceptable access and other facilities necessary for public use. Operations during the year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $-5,302. Renourishment cost was $37,301. Reconnaissance cost was $-23,569. Feasibility cost was $62,168. Engineering and design cost was $290,700. Construction management cost was $-6,124. Condition at end of fiscal year. GRR for Estero and Gasparilla Islands is underway. Indications are that scope and estimate changes associated with additional structures may require Congressional reauthorization. 46. MANATEE COUNTY, FL Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf shoreline. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the shore protection project for Manatee County, which includes the entire 7.5-mile, gulf shoreline of Anna Maria Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to an elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The project also provides for periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Estimated cost is $43,600,000 Federal and $36,400,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Manatee County, Florida was made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would be in 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 accordance with policy established by existing law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction: Provided that, prior to construction, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash contribution equal to 47 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation's costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $3,337,348. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $-6,734. Renourishment cost was $-31,716. Engineering and design cost was $44,932. Condition at end of fiscal year. The local sponsor is preparing P&S for the next renourishment and has requested approval to use Section 206 (WRDA 92) authority for reimbursement. Renourishment contract is scheduled for award in FY 2001 by Manatee County. 47. MARTIN COUNTY, FL Location. Martin County is located on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project. The recommended plan of improvement for Martin County provides for restoration of a protective beach along 3.75 miles of shoreline. The plan includes restoration of the primary dune as needed and a 35-foot wide protective berm. The recommended plan was designed to reduce environmental impacts. Of primary importance is the impact of project construction on sea turtle nesting. In order to avoid these impacts, project construction has to occur between November 1st and April 15th. Only one island segment is authorized for this project which is located on Hutchinson Island in Martin County. The project begins at the St. Lucie/Martin County line and proceeds south 4 miles. The actual project to be constructed is 3.75 miles. The project was shortened 0.25 miles to avoid impacting sensitive hardgrounds. The borrow area is approximately 3,000 feet offshore of the southern end of the project area. Estimated cost of new work is $35,800,000 Federal and $41,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Martin County Board of Commissioners is the local sponsor. Non-Federal funds will be requested from the sponsor following execution of the PCA. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $5,030,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was $86. Beach renourishment cost was $245,106. Reconnaissance cost was $15,650. Feasibility cost was $-15,427. Engineering and design cost was $191,868. Engineering during construction cost $444. HTRW cost was $964. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial nourishment was completed April 1996. Preparation of plans and specifications for the 1st renourishment was initiated October 1999. Construction to begin November 2000. 48. NASSAU COUNTY, FL Location. Nassau County is on the east coast of Florida, north of Jacksonville and adjoins the state of Georgia. The authorized project comprises 4.3 miles of beach along the ocean shore of northern Amelia Island, and tightening 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the existing south jetty at the entrance to Fernandina Harbor. 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project would provide initial restoration of 3.6 miles of eroded beach, starting at a point about .7 mile south of the Fernandina Harbor south jetty and extending south to Sadler Road; sand tightening about 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the south jetty; and periodic nourishment of 4.3 miles of shore between the south jetty and Sadler Road. The restored beach would have a 20-foot wide level berm at an elevation of 13 feet above mean low water. The initial beach fill would consist of an estimated 1,100,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 240,000 cubic yards of nourishment at 2-year intervals would be required. Sand tightening would require about 16,700 tons of stone. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 77%. (Sand tightening, accomplished as part of the Navy's effort to deepen and widen the navigation channel was deleted from the plan.) Estimated cost of new work $13,000,000 Federal and $3,500,000 non-Federal contributed funds. Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Nassau County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material and relocations required for construction of the project, including that required for periodic nourishment; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from construction and subsequent maintenance, operation and public use of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during the useful life of the project; assure maintenance and repair during the useful life of the project as required to serve the project's intended purpose; provide and maintain clearly marked beach access, nearby parking areas, and other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms, and as required to realize the benefits upon which Federal participation is based; provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function, exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership at the time of implementation; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment during the useful life of the project, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment, with the actual amount to be based on existing law and conditions of ownership at the time of each nourishment; and at least annually inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $-44,317. Renourishment cost was $-1,476. Reconnaissance cost was $-2,929. Feasibility cost was $-7,939. Collection of basic data cost was $-3,884. Engineering and design cost $258,588. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completion of PED is scheduled for September 2001. 49. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project authorization, the River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet-Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach-Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost Federal and contributions. Legislation.) for Palm Beach County is $78,000,000 $159,200,000 non-Federal cash (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project, of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (c) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic life as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $1,432. Renourishment contract cost was $-259,283. Reconnaissance cost was $- 3,098. Engineering and design was $57,197. Construction management cost was $303. Condition at end of fiscal year. PCA for Ocean Ridge has been signed by the sponsor and awaiting signature by ASA (CW). Reimbursement of $2M to the local sponsor will occur once approved. Boca Raton will be reimbursed for approximately $2M. 50. PALM BEACH ISLAND, FL Location. Palm Beach Island is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466). Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorization provides for Federal participation in the costs of a plan for protection of the shore of the Palm Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean high water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially in accordance with the plan developed by the district engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal assistance would entail contribution of funds in the amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the expenditures for construction, and for operation, maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost for Palm Beach Island is $13,400,000 Federal and $154,100,000 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval of the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project (except the sandtransfer plant already under contract), of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make appropriate modification of the location of the end of the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; (c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-ofway; (d) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals, including operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Condition at end offiscal year. No work scheduled. 51. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT nourishment of each island. Estimated cost is $167,2,000 Federal and $113,100,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $25,160,345. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $2,668. Beach renourishment cost was $9,581,833. Reconnaissance cost was $32,452. Feasibility cost was $-47,281. Engineering and design and construction management cost $791,016 and $626,125 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. First renourishment of Sand Key, Phases I, II, III, completed October 1999. Preparation of DM for north terminal structure on Treasure Island underway; completion scheduled for March 2000. 4t renourishment of Long Key underway; completion scheduled for June 2000. Preparation of comprehensive EA which includes new borrow sources has been initiated, completion scheduled for May 2001. Preparation of a DM for the construction of the authorized breakwaters along Sand Key has been initiated. 52. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Location. St. John's County is located about 100 miles south of the Florida/Georgia border. Existing project. The project consists of restoration of 2.5 miles of shoreline, beginning approximately 2.7 miles south of St. Augustine Inlet, and including the City of St. Augustine Beach. The authorized project provides for initial restoration of the beach to a width of 80 feet +12 feet elevation relative to mean low water. The initial fill would consist of placement of 3,580,000 cubic yards of beach quality sand, includes six years of advanced nourishment. The project would replace sand lost due to frequent northeasters and provide storm protection to upland development. The borrow area is located at the ebb tidal shoal south of St. Augustine. The project was authorized with a 50-year project life from the start of construction. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost is $153,400,000 Federal and $37,100,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The sponsor of this project is the St. John's County Board of Commissioners. Cost sharing for this project is 76.4 percent Federal and 23.6 percent Non- Federal. The cost sharing reflects the higher Federal percentage required to mitigate for erosion caused by the Federal navigation project at St. Augustine Harbor. PCA will be executed following completion and approval of the General Reevaluation Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $-25,077. Channel and canal cost was $-3,287. Beach renourishment cost was $5,947. Feasibility cost was $78,580. Miscellaneous cost was $-1,083. Engineering and design cost was $273,355. Condition at end of fiscal year. GRR approved by ASA (CW) December 1998. Preparation of plans and specifications were underway in FY 99. First contract could be awarded in October 2002. 53. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The northern most portion of the project adjoins the Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice Beach. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in the construction of a protective beach 12,600 feet long at Longboat Key and a protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at the City of Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas located between 1 to 2 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 miles offshore of Manasota Key south of the project area. This borrow area will be supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. Estimated cost is $55,200,000 Federal and $26,300,000 non-Federal. The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of applicable nourishment costs. Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) provide a cash contribution equal to 29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs of construction for nourishment of private lands and share in the costs of construction for public lands landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $4,994,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channel and canal cost was $3,384. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost was $16,204 and $11,117 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial construction of 3.2 miles of beach fill was broken into two contracts. The first contract was completed in January 1995. The second contract was completed in June 1996. Construction of an artificial reef was completed by the local sponsor in the winter of 1997 as mitigation. Audit underway to reimburse locals for Federal share of reef. 54. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Key West, FL; Lido Key, FL; Mullet Key, FL; Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL were deauthorized January 1, 1990 by the WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676. (See Table 9- D.) 55. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Little Talbot Island, FL $8,127; Hwy 187, Pinones, PR $29,178; Former USCG Seaplane Base, Miami, FL $14,900; Puerto Nuevo Beach, PR $29,646. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 56. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Location. The project is generally located within the southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-Q. Also, see Table 9-N for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work is $2,156,959 Federal and $1,492,520 Non-Federal, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects.(See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-R for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $63,176,394. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-S for work accomplished.) 9-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 -- total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S- 18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gauging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Water Preserve Areas, Indian River Lagoon, and Southwest Florida feasibility studies are underway. Engineering and design is underway for Upper St. Johns, South Dade, C- 51, C-7, 8, 9 GRR and Manatee Pass. Construction of the Upper St. Johns, C-51 and C-111 projects is underway. The Comprehensive Review Study was completed and submitted to Congress 1 July 1999. (For status of work under construction at the end of the fiscal year see Table 9-P.) 57. DADE COUNTY, FL Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project is $177,300,000 Federal cost and $160,600,000 non-Federal cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (H 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public 9-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved June 30, 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $38,357,335. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Breakwater and seawall cost was $609,658. Renourishment cost was $12,909,679. Engineering and design and construction management cost $971,302 and $665,356 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Renourishment for Surfside and South Miami Beach was completed in July 1999. The contract for sand tightening the north jetty at Government Cut was completed in June 1999. Engineering and design is continuing for several upcoming renourishments. The contract for renourishment of Sunny Isles and construction of two offshore breakwaters is scheduled to be awarded in summer 2000. Engineering and design is underway for two upcoming contracts. The contract for renourishment of North Miami Beach is scheduled to be awarded winter 2000/spring 2001. Another contract for renourishment of Haulover Beach is also scheduled to be awarded in winter 2000/spring 2001. 58. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life of the project. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-federal contribution for new work was $8,082,927. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work scheduled. 59. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins -- the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -- and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area -- a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River -- 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures and levees; Oklawaha River - -a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River -- one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River -- Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-T on Moss Bluff Lock.) 9-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Estimated cost for new work is $179,000,000 Federal and $157,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $13,909,201. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $20,050. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. Awaiting fiscal closeout of Flatwoods Phase I, before initiating Phase II. 60. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement -- one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project is $430,300,000 Federal and $144,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir, which was signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $7,125,899. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract for dams cost was $7,512,500. Building, grounds, and utilities cost was $706,700. Engineering and design and construction management cost $1,498,800 and $475,500 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final grouting was completed in 1999. Construction of Portugues office building will be completed in 2000. Cerrillos Dam Lake Recreation will be advertised and awarded in 2000. Plans and specifications for construction of the Portugues Dam will be completed in 2000. 61. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR Location. The Rio de La Plata basin is located about 11 miles west of the San Juan metropolitan area along the north coast of Puerto Rico. The Rio de la Plata basin drains an area of 240 square miles through several towns and villages into the Atlantic Ocean. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It would provide 100-year protection upstream of PR Highway 2 and SPF protection down stream and calls for construction of 7.6 miles of levees. The plan includes the replacement of 3 bridges, recreation facilities, and mitigation for the loss of environmental habitats. The benefit-cost ratio is 1.6. Estimated cost is $64,900,000 Federal and $32,100,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The project cooperation agreement was executed on 7 June 1995. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Department of Natural and Environmental 9-34 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Resources, is the body authorized to represent the local interest and is responsible for complying with the following requirements: (1) provide a cash contribution equal to five percent of total project costs; (2) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas; (3) provide an additional cash payment when the sum of both items (1) and (2) are less than 25 percent of total project costs; (4) operate and maintain the project after completion, including accomplishment of any needed repairs or rehabilitation's of any of its components; (5) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or subsequent maintenance of the project, expect due to damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (6) prevent future encroachments which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; (7) participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; and (8) (a) provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; and (b) recreation local cooperation requirements: (1) provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities and provide all land required for recreation; and (2) all costs and full responsibility for the operation, maintenance, replacement, and management of recreation lands and facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $429,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Sponsor is proceeding with land acquisition for first contract. Award Contract #1 (lower channel) in November 2000. Contract #1 extends from Atlantic Ocean to Station 163+95 (about 3 miles). 62. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR Location. The Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin is located within the San Juan Metropolitan Area along the northern coast of Puerto Rico. The basin joins the southeast side of San Juan Harbor and extends south and up into the foothills of the central mountains of Puerto Rico. The basin is traversed by the Rio Piedras, Rio Puerto Nuevo, Quebrada Margarita, Quebrada Josefima, Quebrada Dona Ana, Quebrada Vista, and Quebrada Guaracanal. Existing project. The authorized project for flood control includes improvements to 11.2 miles of the existing channel of Rio Puerto Nuevo and Rio Piedras and five tributaries of the Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin. The 25 square mile drainage basin drains into San Juan Harbor. Estimated cost of the project is $321,000,000 Federal and $115,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide cash contribution equal to five percent of the total project costs; provide LERRD (except railroad bridge alterations); provide an additional cash payment when the sum of cash and LERRD are less than 25 percent of the total project costs; operate and maintain project works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments; participate and comply with Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities; and all costs and full responsibility for operations, maintenance, replacement, and management of the recreation lands and facilities. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $8,670,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channels and canals cost was $6,962,300. Engineering and design cost was $3,017,100. Construction management cost was $1,173,700. Condition at end offiscal year. Contract No.1 (first 1.7 miles of channel) is scheduled for completion November 2000. Contract #2A (Margarita Earthen Channel, next 1.3 miles of channel) is scheduled for completion by May 2002. Plans and specifications for Contract 2AA (Margarita Levee and Bechara Drainage Works) are underway with advertisement scheduled August 2000. Plans and specifications for Contract 2B, Roosevelt Avenue Bridge Replacement and Associated Channel Work are complete and will advertise once sponsor has completed land acquisition. Contract 2D1, Foundation Fortification of the de Diego Bridge over Rio Piedras and Associated Channel Works, plans and specifications were initiated in August 1999. Detailed Design Report for Contract 2C, the Margarita Concrete Channel, is being initiated in 2000. 63. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $74,989. 9-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 64. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-E.) 65. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 9-V.) Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $508,390 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Emergency Operations cost was $846,657. Rehabilitation cost was $3,933,865. National Emergency Preparedness Program cost was $187,958. Emergency maintenance operation cost of navigation channels and harbors cost was $4,270,498. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). Federal cost for the fiscal year was Coordination Account $9,525; Los Carolinas Bridge, Caguas, PR $29,369; and Police Station and Sewerline, Trujillo Alto, PR $34,538. General Investigations 66. SURVEYS Costs during the fiscal year were: navigation studies $909,946; flood damage prevention studies $170,588; shoreline protection studies $5,220; special studies $267,108; review of authorized projects $64,263; miscellaneous activities $75,114; and coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests $508,692; for a total cost of $2,000,931. 67. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. Flood Plain Management Services $254,397; Technical Services $113,192; Quick Responses $6,780; SE Florida Evacuation Study $7,351; Hurricane Evacuation Study Northern Puerto Rico $20,135; Hurricane Evacuation Study Western Puerto Rico $18,530; Seminole Floodway $22,135; Puerto Rico Hurricane Evacuation Study Wrapup $57,975; for a total cost of $285,228. 68. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Navigation cost was Jacksonville Harbor $185,483, Hillsboro Inlet $-7,114, Lake Worth Inlet $179,410, Ponce De Leon Inlet $94,187 and St. Lucie Inlet $182,859. Beach erosion cost was Brevard County $155,502 and Monroe County, FL $52,614. Local protection cost was Rio Nigua de Salinas, PR $224,393. Total cost for Continuation of Planning and Engineering was $1,067,333. 69. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation cost was Miami River Sediments, FL $3,310, and Tampa Harbor Big Bend, FL $15,063. Beach erosion control cost was Nassau County, FL $198,044. Flood control cost was Guanajibo River, PR $318,607, Arecibo River $205,264, and Cedar Hammock (Wares Creek), Fl $136,849. Total cost for Advance Engineering and Design was $877,137. General Regulatory 70. PERMIT EVALUATION (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Location. Navigable waters of the United States, including tributary systems, headwaters and isolated waters, and ocean waters to the limits of the territorial seas. Existing Program. The program evaluates permit applications for work in navigable waters (dredging, filling, and other structures) of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material to the oceans for ocean disposal. Geographic coverage includes Florida, Puerto 9-36 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Decision making criteria consist of the public interest review, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and ocean dumping criteria. Local Cooperation. Joint application agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the regional Water Management Districts (WMD) have been signed. Have developed a Programmatic General Permit with the FDEP and are in the process of expanding it. We are working closely with the FDEP on watershed/ecosystem management areas for the state. Joint application booklet with the Virgin Island Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) is finished. We are developing a joint federal/state process for mitigation banks in Florida. All involved agencies (FWS, EPA, NMFS, FDEP, and the WMDs) have embraced the Mitigation Bank Review Team (MBRT) approach to permitting as laid out in the Federal guidelines. The Federal agencies are in agreement on the credit/debit method. Operations and results during fiscal year. Permit evaluation cost was $6,447,604. 71. ENFORCEMENT (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Existing program. The program takes appropriate enforcement action against both unauthorized work requiring a permit and noncompliance findings on issued permits. Operation of the program is continuing to make increased use of alternative dispute resolution processes to remediate violations. Close coordination with and cooperation of Department of Justice continues, with development of consent orders and fines as appropriate. Local cooperation: Developed MOA agreement on enforcement with EPA Region II to cover Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The local operating agreement with FDEP and WMD contains provisions for cooperative enforcement, within the limits of state and federal law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Cost incurred this fiscal year for enforcement was $892,759. 72. STUDIES (R&H Act of 1899) Location. Navigable waters of the United States in Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Existing program. This program conducts studies to determine geographic extent of navigable waters of the United States, and establishment of danger or restricted zones in these waters. Local cooperation. This program is carried out with informal cooperation with the State of Florida and cooperation of other Department of Defense agencies needing restricted zones in which to conduct their defense related missions. In addition we are cooperating with the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), the local sponsor of the AIWW and the IWW, to update our criteria's for setback requirements for structures in the IWW and the AIWW to ensure the safety of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Studies cost was $14,415. Environmental inspection statement cost was $319,052. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 73. KISSIMMEE RIVER, FLORIDA Location. The Kissimmee River Basin comprises 3,013 square miles, and extends from Orlando southward to Lake Okeechobee, the second largest freshwater lake in the United States. The area is bounded on the north by the lakes of the Orlando area, on the west by the Peace River Basin, on the south by Lake Okeechobee, and in the east by the Upper St. John's and the Taylor Creek-Nuddin Slough Basins. The watershed is about 105 miles long and has a maximum width of 35 miles. Existing Project. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of Federal participation in the Level II Backfilling Plan, as developed by the South Florida Water Management District, for restoration of the Kissimmee River and flood plain ecosystem. It is expected that restoration will restore the ecological integrity of the river system. Environmental improvements through modification of operations for Lake Kissimmee, Cypress, and Hatchineha. The project will include canal and/or structure improvements and real estate acquisition. The recommended plan consists of backfilling approximately 29 miles of C-38. This will result in the restoration of almost 29,000 acres in the floodplain. Three structures will be removed and two 9-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 bridges and associated utilities will be relocated. Real estate interests will be acquired for effected portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost of the project for Kissimmee River (Upper and Lower Basins) $224,800,000 Federal and $293,200,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. The South Florida Water Management District, an agency of the State of Florida, is the feasibility study cost-sharing partner, and has expressed its intent to be the project sponsor. Local cost for the Headwater Revitalization is to be credited towards the total project cost. The authorization calls for the restoration to be cost-shared 50%-50% and that the lands be credited toward the total cost of the Kissimmee River Restoration. A draft Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) has been reviewed by the sponsor and a letter of intent has been provided for the Headwaters Revitalization. LCA for the River Restoration project is scheduled for execution in May 1994. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $1,100,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $2,814,000. Fish and wildlife cost was $93,000. Canal cost was $3,723,000. Levees and floodwall cost was $716,000. Floodway control structure cost was $452,000. Engineering and Design cost was $3,947,000. Construction management cost was $497,000. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction is near completion for modification of structure S-65. Pool C local levees have been completed. The following contracts are under construction: widening of canal C-36 and maintaining canal S-35, backfilling 7 miles of Reach 1, modifying tie-back levees at S-65A, and adding culverts in spoil bank in Pool A. Engineering and design continues for mitigation measures in the Istokpoga Basin. 74. EVERGLADES SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL Location. The area consisting of the lands and waters within the boundary of the South Florida Water Management District, including the Everglades, the Florida Keys, and the contiguous near-shore coastal waters of South Florida. Existing Project. The authorized project shall develop a comprehensive plan for the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the South Florida Ecosystem. The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection of water quality in, and the reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the Everglades. The comprehensive plan shall include such features as are necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the region, including flood control, the enhancement of water supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and Southern Florida Project. The comprehensive plan shall be developed in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and in consultation with the Task Force. Projects identified for design and construction of any Central and Southern Florida Project that are authorized, may use funds that are available provided that they will accelerate the restoration, preservation, and protection of the South Florida ecosystem; will be generally consistent with the conceptual framework specified in the report entitled "Conceptual Plan for the Central and Southern Florida Project Restudy"; and be compatible with the overall authorized purposes of the Central and Southern Florida Project. If it is determined, in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and the Task Force, that a restoration project for the South Florida ecosystem will produce independent, immediate, and substantial restoration, preservation, and protection benefits, and will be generally consistent with the conceptual framework, the project may proceed expeditiously with the implementation of the restoration. Estimated cost of the project $74,792,000 Federal and $74,793,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. The comprehensive plan shall be developed in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and in consultation with the Task Force. The non- Federal cost share is 50 percent, except for water quality, which is 100 percent with the exclusion of Everglades's restoration, which is 50 percent. The value of lands or interests in land acquired by non-Federal interests will be included in the total cost of the activity and credited against the non-Federal share of the cost of the activity. The operation and maintenance of projects will be a non- Federal responsibility. Non-Federal contributions amount to $4,009,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $3,552,000. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Plans and specifications are nearing completion on East Coast Canal Structures and Western C-11 Water Quality Treatment Projects. PCA's were executed on eight projects 7 January 2000. The eight projects are: East Coast Canal 9-38 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Structures, Tamiami Trail Culverts, Western C-11 Water Quality Treatment, Seminole Big Cypress Preservation Water Conservation, Southern Crew, Lake Okeechobee Water Retention/Phosphorus Removal, Ten Mile Creek Water Preserve Area, and Lake Trafford. The PCA for Keys Carrying Capacity was executed in 1998. 75. RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Restoration Activities Pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662. Fiscal year costs were Coordination Account Funds $3,707; Initial Appraisals $30,340; Wetland Restoration Oklawaha River, FL $10,181; Munyon Island Wetland Palm Beach, FL $602,215; La Esperanza Peninsula, PR $33,890; Peanut Island Restoration, FL $67,131; Manatee Protection, Canaveral Lock, FL $230,244; Sarasota Bay Restoration, Sarasota, FL $134,732; Palm River Restoration, Hillsborough Co., FL $104,500. Restoration Activities Pursuant to Sec 206, Public Law 104-303. Coordination Account Funds $1,453; Preliminary Restoration Plans $32,507; Aquatic Ecosystem $38,169. 76. WETLAND AND OTHER AQUATIC HABITAT CREATION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Wetland Activities Pursuant to Sec 204 Public Law 102-560. Fiscal year costs was Cockroach Bay Habitat $41,849. 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 1.Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) 2.Arecibo Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 3 .Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St.Johns River, FL 4.Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) 5.Canaveral Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6.Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 670,000 844,409 - 82,000 (55,622) 144,434 - 39,412,500 9,919 39,409,093 - 190,000 - 179,472 75,000 3,048,000 75,859 3,023,822 1,128,0751 1,128,0751 4,491,431 4,480,903 - - 361,2252 - - 361,2252 10,000 51,000 10,778,042 17,764 45,111 10,770,881 - 243,2353 - 243,2353 - 185,688 - 185,688 1,046,600 1,365,000 6,866,000 962,000 1,353,591 1,593,412 6,309,299 1,478,243 2,963,566 5,649,560 3,991,000 4,397,000 3,559,341 5,643,304 4,027,017 4,297,912 408 (163) 39,446,310 4 39,384,391 83,139,366 83,011,262 - (9,308) 2,558,133 375,348 145,046 2,335,179 305,290 305,290 2,243,372 2,243,372 159,975 159,975 9-40 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 7.Charlotte Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 8.Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) 9.Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 10.Femrnandina Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11.Fort Myers Beach Channel, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint : Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 99,000 2,499,000 1,944,000 2,690,000 94,474 2,456,676 1,978,085 2,699,790 30,000 20,000 22,715 45,488 3,386 533,169s 533,169" 22,835,644 22,831,285 63,567,473 63,567,473 - 32,529,6806 6,579 32,523,486 9,627 9,627 2,137 2,137 (763) 2,334 -- - - 4,639,0407 -- - - 4,639,0407 1,393,830 798,000 3,830,000 1,765,000 39,855,010 1,403,250 769,210 3,828,284 1,744,989 39,802,938 -- - - 935,000 -- - - 935,000 -- - - 158,1408 -- - - 158,1408 - 40,000 490,000 110,000 500 0 505,491 121,005 1,646,131 1,632,627 9-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 12.Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13.Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (Federal Funds) 14.Intracoastal Waterway Jacksonville to Miami, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15.Jacksonville Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 856,000 (150,000) 1,097,691 (50,461) 277,048 510,000 780,000 71,000 274,298 455,008 811,417 96,214 465,000 28,813 1,012,618 104,297 10,272 - 5,424,500 - 5,417,853 8,269,238 8,262,954 2,503.387 2,498,659 - 8,112,557 9 - 8,112,557 9 86,000 137,000 172,000 373,000 60,677 162,166 167,882 334,502 7,616,259 1o 7,573,313 o10 - - - - 19,251,598 11 - - - - 19,251,598 11 2,724,700 1,496,000 2,936,000 5,209,000 56,708,382 12 2,697,909 1,513,913 2,900,112 5,138,066 56,525,524 12 - - - - 61,000 - - - - 61,000 - -- 1,900,000 49,496,278 13 - - - 1,604,840 49,201,118 13 7,786,000 5,583,000 4,692,000 3,405,000 100,302,99814 7,742,496 5,614,015 4,636,411 3,418,078 100,236,32314 - - - - 102,813 - - - - 102,813 - - - - 927,654 15 - - - - 927,654 15 - - - - 25,000 - - - - 25,000 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 16.Jacksonville Hbr. (Mill Cove), FL (Federal Funds) 17.Johns Pass, FL (Federal Funds) 18.Long Boat Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19.Manatee Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20.Mayaguez Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 21.Melbourne Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 764 35,000 35,685 11,000 1,145,000 10,937 1,143,281 25,000 22,156 2,040 4,104,000 4,094,741 82,098 16 82,098 16 1,945,712 1,942,479 1,020,233 1,020,233 3,753,186 3,753,162 172,324 172,324 3,440,000 603,100 376,000 (30,000) 6,082,100 2,912,775 1,348,294 76,252 105,255 5,902,191 100,000 1,055,000 4,166,000 78,469 1,062,354 4,178,355 2,413,153 148,790 2,308,658 278,285 5,321,000 5,319,176 2,586,943 2,586,943 168,187 168,187 1,061,561 1,061,561 17,696 17,696 634,864 634,864 9-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 22.Miami Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23.New Pass Sarasota, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 400,636 3,440,000 248,000 1,126,000 50,621,625 17 399,261 3,458,812 59,840 1,266,962 50,565,93817 154,300 320,000 280,000 135,000 188,109 313,577 283,694 123,551 6,371,817 6,331,493 2,300,710 s18 2,300,710 18is 45,811 19 45,811 19 100,000 1,790,000 95,273 1,760,491 24.Okeechobee Waterway, FL (Federal Funds) 25.Oklawaha River, FL (Federal Funds) 26.Palm Beach Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 27. Palm Valley Bridge, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 4,270,900 3,425,000 7,025,000 3,289,000 4,649,233 3,454,609 7,003,440 3,260,515 127,000 80,500 46,000 10,000 125,476 83,449 42,965 15,512 1,703,000 2,215,000 2,127,000 1,657,400 1,613,619 2,268,681 1,985,109 1,727,178 25,000 25,000 451,000 700,000 28,853 23,382 193,768 265,012 9-44 Maint: Approp. Cost 50,000 14,738 730 6,745,926 6,744,698 21,756,418 20 21,756,418 20 77,394,421 21 77,352,170 21 315,264 22 315,264 22 2,859,076 23 2,858,303 23 6,924,021 24 6,924,021 24 27,343,346 25 27,232,570 25 2,067,100 1,373,099 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 28.Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29.Ponce Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30.Port Everglades Harbor, Fl (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - 1,953,276 - 1,953,276 255,482 245,000 1,405,000 1,270,000 245,932 230,286 1,391,092 1,220,805 22,615,420 22,522,172 - 2,415,600 - 2,415,600 - 1,379,000 - 1,112,663 - 2,227,260 26 - 2,227,260 26 (668) 1,779,270 1,779,270 717,304 717,304 (107) 90,000 95,000 278,000 50,000 47,667 136,651 247,493 65,421 54,426,666 27 54,426,666 27 2,362,878 2,347,021 31.Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 32. St. Augustine Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 3,700,000 5,965,000 3,088,000 5,467,000 72,939,137 3,626,023 5,958,507 3,139,877 5,259,768 72,680,015 3,291,000 172,000 3,192,124 273,090 100,000 60,000 94,813 56,066 1,476,434 28 1,476,434 28 9,341,107 9,333,732 9-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 33. St. Johns River, FL Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 34. St. Lucie Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35.San Juan Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36.Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,171,243 29 1,171,243 29 1,300,299 30 1,300,299 30 7,766,689 31 7,766,489 31 622,471 (25,000) 510,532 83,092 - (15,000) 10,161,956 8,290 (10,337) 10,152,193 - - (108,184) 3,851,383 - - 99,217 3,851,383 800,000 5,036,000 1,519,000 21,099,968 32 481,609 1,168,107 5,096,761 20,491,445 33,694 44,275 970,000 22,505,829 33 57 916,800 22,452,572 33 300,000 1,800,000 107,250 1,675,741 (50) 3,159,197 4,472,440 5,910,000 3,224,500 3,099,521 4,509,614 5,818,645 3,232,324 2,100,000 1,782,991 173,767,440 34 173,767,440 34 57,272,232 35 57,163,858 35 1,038,711 1,038,711 36.Tampa Harbor, FL (East Bay - Branch Channels) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (187) 25,000 300,000 623 - 90,286 174,643 2,014,813 1,954,742 - 814,450 - 718,674 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 36. Tampa Harbor, FL (Port Sutton) (Federal Funds) 36. Tampa Harbor, FL (Big Bend) (Federal Funds) 40. Brevard County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control & Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Proj. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Duval County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 43. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 44.Indian River County, FL (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 9,249 190,415 62,566 - 145,000 40,000 25,000 - 118,686 40,968 15,063 (2,619) 446,000 154,000 746 36,851 396,110 124,785 555,000 466,812 210,000 174,718 2,936,873 2,894.619 29,001 29,001 - 148,670 51,330 - - 150,511 33,000 3,273 30,717 2,462,000 2,438,309 - 94,000 40,000 19,527,100 7,785 7,950 99,517 19,474,319 - 26,884 - 26,884 - 3,460,990 36 - 3,460,990 36 955,000 1,474,284 - 261,000 152,000 20,173,900 71,332 98,886 212,656 20,031,638 16,895,567 1,553,093 302,982 1,839,396 16,895,567 (29,345) 595,000 2,123,000 1,410,000 5,581,655 21,661 468,591 383,661 3,062,753 5,368,660 - 3,715,000 - 3,623,800 - 113,000 - 74,580 (319) 4,623,000 4,528,211 498,681 460,261 9-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 45.Lee County, FL (Federal Funds) 46.Manatee County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 47.Martin County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 48.Nassau County, FL (Federal Funds) 49.Palm Beach County, FL (Federal Funds) 50.Palm Beach Island, FL (Federal Funds) 51.Pinellas County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 52. St. Johns County, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 557,000 1,111,000 337,000 279,000 320,947 1,206,851 382,220 355,174 (25,000) 339,000 7,220 313,043 3,480,000 3,406,590 193,000 (152,000) 6,115,600 48,522 6,482 6,103,440 4,667,400 138,900 393,000 210,000 4,621,034 245,164 398,447 198,261 5,030,000 4,766,963 216,258 206,899 240,430 9,153 357,000 314,900 127,000 15,851 290,732 240,489 198,044 3,337,348 3,337,320 5,655,600 5,637,482 5,030,000 5,016,752 1,875,553 1,805,919 20,000 200,000 5,312,000 (195,000) 14,357,434 31,140 171,287 5,335,393 (203,450) 14,315,089 - - - - 13,621 - - - - 13,621 12,760 60 3,331,000 1,560,000 11,670,000 4,991,000 3,540,112 1,646,353 8,841,616 7,345,421 1,230,971 - 5,000,000 5,253,828 - 4,463,467 3,641,392 193,786 334,000 455,000 109,000 218,273 359,162 197,764 328,435 1,793,000 1,793,000 42,404,693 41,778,331 5,625 5,625 30,414,173 28,251,560 1,799,286 1,744,954 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 Total Cost To FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 52. St. Johns County, FL (Contrib. Funds) 53.Sarasota County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 56.Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 57. Dade County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 58.Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 59.Four River Basins, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 60. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 28,986 28,986 6,361,000 377,000 470,000 50,000 14,313,799 6,495,796 1,020,099 572,262 20,164 14,268,653 1,510,000 2,546,140 26,605 62,896 10,541 6,615,915 16,813,000 20,209,000 14,327,000 16,266,966 17,837,677 16,552,693 17,514,478 10,263,000 10,245,000 8,724,000 10,132,600 10,183,965 10,563,383 8,840,884 10,073,397 5,020,605 4,825,343 470,778,313 37 468,834,505 37 152,607,540 152,511,383 352,190 1,917,000 2,896,395 2,678,707 65,855,101 554,271 1,682,687 1,834,724 2,570,763 64,343,491 724,988 4,606,000 3,607,000 5,300,000 56,089,552 38 787,857 4,593,948 2,045,748 6,185,514 55,257,496 38 - 2,500,000 1,017,755 4,131,499 4,000,000 1,558,942 - 5,353,213 (389) 39,916,277 39 39,710,371 39 - 6,801,611 - 6,801,611 - 8,082,927 - 8,082,927 685,000 69,000 151,000 640,914 153,901 38,092 9,660,000 8,232,000 9,677,447 10,839,511 - 76,255,095 40 20,050 76,158,822 40 11,939,000 8,094,000 10,108,478 9,544,272 13,909,201 13,900,291 379,439,968 378,810,399 9-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 60. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (Contrib. Funds) 61.Rio De La Plata, PR (Federal Funds) 62.Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 70.General Regulatory (Federal Funds) 73.Kissimmee River, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib Funds) 74. Everglades South Florida Ecosystem Restoration, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib Funds) New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 156,326 2,335,000 1,713,000 587,302 463,304 1,535,598 939,591 1,072,506 229,000 418,000 479,000 340,000 258,605 462,859 385,371 429,367 8,170,000 11,173,000 7,931,655 11,464,449 14,146,000 11,157,000 13,126,044 9,734,511 2,220,000 2,100,000 3,500,000 3,750,000 1,870,994 1,997,157 3,335,479 1,418,592 7,713,201 6,114,568 5,886,998 5,846,943 55,175,096 52,425,031 12,420,000 8,604,553 7,086,000 7,231,000 7,295,000 7,390,000 69,776,200 41 6,176,766 7,061,780 7,240,244 7,673,829 69,227,991 41 - - 2,817,000 6,339,000 41,235,000 3,716,384 5,130,869 7,898,500 9,269,223 40,317,400 - 1,100,000 493,000 - - 380,850 - 4,009,000 1,809,000 - 1,199,364 3,152,382 - 500,000 1,593,000 380,850 5,818,000 4,351,746 500,000 1 Excludes $288,000 for contributed funds for new work. 2 Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3 Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 4 Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. 5 Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project in Boca Grande entrance channel from contributed funds. 6 Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 7 Includes $905,221 expended for recreation facilities. 8 Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9 Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel: and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 10 Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project 11 Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. 12 Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation 13 Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous pmrojeacnt d $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 14 Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 15 Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 16 Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new worke xcludes $53,732c ontributedfu nds. 17 Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work foundsf or new work. Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. 18 Includes$ 381,479 work-in-kinda nd $172,314 in costsf or north jetty recreationfa cility. 19 Excludes$ 45,811 contributefdu nds forn ew work. 20 Includes $21,101,919 for new work underprevious pmroject, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissancea nd detailed pmrojecrte portp reparedu nder Section 107 modificationto thep roject. 21 Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributedfu nds on previousp rojects, $67,558 which representss ervices renderedw ithoutr etmbursement, and$ 113,744 for maintenancea nd operationso f dams. 22 Includes $3,912 for new work for previous pmrojects. 23 Includes$ 11,414 foro peratinga nd careu nderp rovisions forp ermanenti ndefinitea ppropriation. 24 Includes$ 80,000 new workf rom public worksf unds.E xcludes $509,506 contributedfu nds. 25 Includes$ 30,000 for maintenancefr om public worksf ounds. 26 Includes$ 11,588 expendedf or restudy, but excludes$ 21,960 expendedf or new work fromc ontributedfu nds. 27 Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. 28 Includes$ 71,303 for new worko n previousp mrojecEtx. cludes$ 137,500 contributedfu nds. 29 Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 30 Includes $25,838 underprevious project. 31 Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 32 Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 33 Includes $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds under previous project. 34 Includes $853,050 for new work from public works funds under previous project & $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributedfu nds. 35 Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 36 Excludes work-in-kind. 37 Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous prjects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, FL, project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advancedb y local interestst oward federal costs. Includes$ 175,000 appropriationa nd$ 175,000 cost for new work at C&SF St. Johns Water Management District. 38 Includes$ 2,294,134 forr eimbursemenct osts to Bal Harbor. 39 Excludesu nusedc ontributedfu nds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 40 Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 41 Funds appropriatedu nderG eneralR egulatoryF unctions9 6X3126. 9-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 NAVIGATION PROJECTS Aug. 26, 1937 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Mar. 4, 1913 Jun. 20, 1939 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FL May apply the computer model developed under the feasibility study to assist non-Federal interests in developing strategies for improving water quality at 50 percent cost share. TAMPA, FL May enter into a cooperative agreement under section 229 with the Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, Fl to provide technical, planning, and design assistance to demonstrate the water quality functions found in wetlands, at an estimated total Federal cost of $500,000. WEST DADE, FL Conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the West Dade, FL, reuse facility to improve water quality in, and increase the supply of surface water to, the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife habitat. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Project for navigation. Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and rehabilitation shall be a non-Federal responsibility, and the non-Federal interest shall assume ownership for the bridge. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet. Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong.,1st sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 t Cong., 1St sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, Cong.,75th 1st sess. P.L.104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong.,3d sess. 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Report of the BAKERS HAULOVER, FL (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Chief of Engineers Turning Basin Project. Oct. 1985 Report of the Project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, FL, Chief of Engineers as modified by the letter of the Secretary Jul. 24, 1991 dated Oct. 10, 1991 WRDA Modification of navigation project to reclassify the removal Oct. 12, 1996 and replacement of stone protection on both sides of the channel as general navigation features. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL (See Section 6 of Text) Jun. 20, 1938 Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong.,1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong.,2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 13, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104 th Cong. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong.,1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong.,1st sess. 9-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 Jul. 23, 1942 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 14, 1880 Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL, FL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. Deauthorized project purposes in the Act of July 23, 1942, transferred lands and completed facilities to the state, and required state payments to Citrus, Clay, Duval, Levy, Marion. and Putnam counties During the period November 28, 1992 and September 30, 1993, authorized and directed to enter into a contract with the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Southwest Florida Water Management District of the State of Florida for the continued operation and maintenance of the project. The maintenance shall be performed at a level of service that is necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. No major rehabilitations or renovations shall be performed in such portions of the project during such period. Funding for the continued operation and maintenance of the barge canal project, shall not exceed $300,000 federal and the State of Florida shall pay a nonfederal share of $600,000 to fund the continued maintenance. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties. 9-54 Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.95, 74thCong.,2dsess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong.,1st sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong.,1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992, 102nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong.,3d sess. Annual Report 1879 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1968 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Def. Act of Mar. 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, Mar. 4, 1933 Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to 600-foot channel width. Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Femrnandina Harbor. Provided for a 26-foot channel. Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. Redesignated location of turning basin until Section 107 (R&H Act of 1960) study is completed and the resulting. project constructed FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests. Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong.,l1st sess. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong.,1st sess. H.Doc. 548, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong.,1st sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong.,2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., ?? sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong.,1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act 9-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Report of the Chief of Engineers Dec. 14, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. Total cost of $6,742,000. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) 9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice. Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1. H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17, 1988 100th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong.,1st sess. Auth. Mar. 1, 1962 by Senate and House Public. Works Comm Auth. by Chief of Engineers, Mar.1, 1963,. under Sec 107 of 1960 R&H Act Jan. 21, 1927 Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to. 9x 100 feet 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong.,2d sess. Channel width of 100 feet. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 9-56 Jul. 3, 1930 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized PARA Jun. 26, Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. 1934 Aug. 26, 1937 Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 12 x 125 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). Mar.2, 1945 Turning basin at Vero Beach. Jul. 3, 1958 Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. Chief of Engineers Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. Report of Jul. 22, 1960,Mod. 12-foot Channel JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE Mar. 2, 1907 The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad Bridge. Nov. 17, 1986 Deauthorized the 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge. WRDA Project for navigation. Aug. 17, 1999 JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL (See Section 16 of Text) Report of the Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill Chief of Engineers Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as Feb. 12, 1982 circulation. Documents Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 28, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess 9-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Modification to carry out a project for mitigation consisting of measures for flow and circulation improvement within. Mill Cove. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 2, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Auth. by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. LAKE WORTH INLET, FL Project for navigation and shoreline protection subject to final report P.L. 104-303, to be completed not later than December 31, 1996. Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. R&H Act, as amended MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) Report of the Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft Chief of Engineers navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay May 12, 1980 to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. WRDA Modified the project for navigation authorized by the Nov. 28, WRDA of 1986 to construct substantially in accordance 1990 with the post authorization change report dated April 1990. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L.101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., ?? sess. Aug. 30, 1935 MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See Section 20 of Text) Approach channels 30 feet deep to and along deep-water terminal. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1,73rd Cong., 1st sess. 9-58 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 3, 1930 PWA Program Sep. 6, 1933 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. The channel at Dinner Key Airport. An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty. Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet. Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912. A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited. to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay. Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. The Virginia Key improvement. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. Jul. 14, 1960 Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key, approach channel widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. Aug. 13, 1968 Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. WRDA Deauthorized the widening at the mouth of Miami River to Nov. 17, 1986 existing project widths; and the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin, to Government Cut, and to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Report of the The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel. Chief of Engineers Sep. 25, 1989 WRDA The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel subject Oct. 12, 1996 to a final report to be completed no later than 31 December 1996. WRDA Modified to include construction of artificial reefs and related Aug. 17, 1999 environmental mitigation. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) Auth. by Chief 10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and of Engineers 8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. Apr. 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong, ?? sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th, Cong P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106 Cong., 1st sess. 9-60 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PARA Jun. 26, 1934 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Nov. 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations. New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. Deauthorized basin at Stuart. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 27, 1916 PARA Jun. 26, 1934 OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report 1889, p.1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act 9-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 13, 1934 Dec. 10, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Deauthorized channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests. Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local of interests, to 20 feet. Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the and inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet restoring existing jetties. Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. Report of the Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to Chief of Engineers a depth of 25 feet on north side of existing basin. Dec. 10, 1985 P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief Engineers to Public Works Administration Oct. 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Comm. H. Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 PALM VALLEY BRIDGE, FL (See Section 27 of Text) Replacement of a two lane bridge. P.L.104-303 Oct. 12, 1996 104 " Cong. 9-62 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 H.R. Sep. 23, 1976, S.R. Oct. 1, 1976 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 3, 1958 PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 28 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment. basin inside the weir Project for navigation and related purposes. PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 29 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests. Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 30 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel. Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alignment and increase turning basin in size and depth. H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 10 6 " Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. 9-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents H.R. May 9, 1974; S.R. May 31, 1974 Report of the Chief of Engineers Sep. 23, 1991 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1919 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 25, 1910 Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. Project for navigation. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 31 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical or other means. Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 32 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 33 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka. The improvement of Deep Creek. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project). A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. 9-64 P.L. 102-580, Oct.,31 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1899 p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 34 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet. Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 35 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth. Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act Modified condition of local cooperation. H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 9-65 Jul. 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage. area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock. Mar. 2, 1945 Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. Aug. 4, 1976 A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin at 30 x 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Report of the Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening Chief of Engineers of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet Dec. 23, 1982 to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 9-66 R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Modification of the project to deepen the bar channel to depths varying from 49 feet to 56 feet below mean low water with other modifications to authorized interior channels as described in the General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment dated March 1994. TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 36 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. HILLSBOROUGH RIVER Mar. 3, 1899 For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL). Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 TAMPA HARBOR, FL Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1998, pp 1357- 1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 9-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet. For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns. 9-68 S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th, Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet. For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Gulf to Mullet Key. Cong.,2d sess. Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut Do. through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction Do. with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a Do. turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. Do. Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet. Do. Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 Do. feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the Do. junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing Do. length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. 9-69 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Aug. 15, 1985 An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet. An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet. Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet. Report of the Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 Chief of Engineers feet and a width of 200 feet. Mar. 28, 1988 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. Maintenance of Alafia Channel to a depth of 34 feet, if a Non-Federal Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Secretary WRDA Project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Expedite completion of report for Alafia Channel and proceed Aug. 17, 1999 to project preconstruction, engineering, and design if justified. TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS, FL Report of the Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Chief of Engineers Tampa Channel and existing turning basins at the entrance to Jan. 25, 1979 Ybor Channel and at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL, FL WRDA Maintenance dredging at an average annual cost of $471,000. Nov.17, 1986 P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 10 6 h Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 106-53 Aug. 17, 1999 106 Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. 9-70 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section 40 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. WRDA Shoreline protection project for periodic nourishment over Oct. 12, 1996 the 50-year life of the project subject to completion of report no later than Dec. 13, 1996. WRDA Use services of independent coastal expert, who shall consider Aug. 17, 1999 all revelant studies and shall mitigate any damage to the shore protection project that is a result of Federal navigation project. Costs of the mitigation shall be allocated to the Federal navigation project as operation and maintenance costs. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 41 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. WRDA Deauthorized navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet. Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Continued authorization for Hillsboro Inlet dredging for 5 years. Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning Oct. 12, 1996 on the date of initiation of construction of segments II and III. WRDA Project for shore protection is modified to authorize the Secretary, Aug. 17, 1999 on execution of a contract to construct the project, to reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of the cost of preconstruction planning and design for the project, if work is compatible with and integral to the project. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong.,2d sess. P.L.104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106th Cong., 1st sess. 9-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FL Report of the Shoreline protection. Chief of Engineers 2 Apr. 1982 DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 57 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL (See Section 57 of Text) Aug. 15, 1985 Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. Report of the Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to Chief of Engineers provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment Dec. 17, 1983 along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 42 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL (See Section 43 of Text) River and Harbor Project for beach erosion control. Act of 1965 WRDA Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning Oct. 12, 1996 on the date of initiation of construction. WRDA Modified to incorporate 1 additional mile into the project in Aug. 17, 1999 accordance with a final approved general reevaluation report. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 44 of Text) WRDA The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore Nov.17, 1986 of Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. WRDA Reauthorized if determined project is technically sound, Aug. 17, 1999 environmentally acceptable, and economically justified. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 12, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106t Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 199, 106 h Cong., 1st sess. 9-72 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 31, 1970 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 LEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Modification of the project for shoreline protection, Captiva Island, to reimburse the non-Federal interest for beach nourishment work carried out by such interest as if such work occurred after execution. of the agreement. Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for Captiva Island for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. Project for shore protection, Captiva Island, is modified to direct the Secretary to enter into an agreement with the Non-Federal interest to carry out the project in accordance with section 206 of WRDA 1992. The design memorandum approved in 1996 shall be the decision document supporting continued Federal participation in cost sharing of the project. H.Doc. 395, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106t Cong., 1st sess. R&H Act of 1970 Sec. 101 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 S.R. May 31, 1974 and H.R. Nov. 20, 1975 LIDO KEY, SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Project for shore protection Deauthorized. Reauthorized project for shore protection for a 50-year period. LITTLE TALBOT ISLAND, DUVAL COUNTY, FL Project for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore protection. MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 46 of Text) The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet (MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 9 9th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong.,1st sess. 9-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MARTIN COUNTY, FL (See Section 47 of Text) Periodic nourishment over the 50 year life of the project. MONROE COUNTY, FL Report of the Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot Chief of Engineers long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. Apr. 22, 1984 NASSAU COUNTY, FL(See Section 48 of Text) Report of the Improvement for beach erosion control on Amelia Island Chief of Engineers May 19, 1986 WRDA Modified to construct the project for periodic nourishment over Aug. 17, 1999 the 50-year life of the project PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 49 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant. WRDA Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act Oct. 12, 1996 to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction for Jupiter/Carlin, Ocean Ridge, and Boca Raton North Beach segments. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL (See Section 50 of Text) May 17, 1950 Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on Palm Beach Island. Jul. 3, 1958 Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet and shore protection project. WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 9-74 P.L.101-640, Nov.28,1990 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662,, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov.17, 1988,. 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106t Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., 2d sess. JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 51 of Text) Nov. 7, 1966 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Report of the Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, Board of Engineers 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at for Rivers and Treasure Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Harbors Apr. 23, Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. 1985 SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 53 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central Chief of Engineers Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of Feb.28, 1986 Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL (See Section 52 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the Chief of Engineers St. Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic Feb. 26, 1980 nourishment. WRDA Modified to include navigation mitigation. Aug. 17, 1999 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CEDAR HAMMOCK (WARES CREEK), FL WRDA Project for flood control. Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 30, 1948 H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106t Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL (See Section 56 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., purposes. 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement. Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 9-75 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Do. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Oct. 27, 1965 Do. Aug. 13, 1968 Do. Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of. Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County. Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Approved Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. Dec. 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 WRDA Deauthorized flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando; Nov. 17, 1986 primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County; and navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. WRDA Extended modified water delivery schedules to Everglades National Nov. 17, 1988 Park. Everglades National Construct modifications to the Central and Southern Park Protection and Florida Project to improve water deliveries into the park and Expansion Act shall, to the extent practicable take steps to restore the natural of 1989 hydrological conditions within the park. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, P.L.101-229, Dec.13, 1989 101st Cong., 2d sess 9-76 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct.12, 1996 Oct. 23, 1962 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Aug. 17,1999 Dec. 31, 1970 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Report of the Chief of Engineers Mar. 5, 1992 Modification of project for flood protection of West Palm Beach (C-51) to provide for the construction of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 East. Modification of the project to implement the recommended plan of improvement for South Dade County (C-111), including acquisition by non-Federal interests of such portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 59 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. Deauthorized Anclote River control structure and channel improvement. GUANAJIBO RIVER, PR Project for flood control. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (See Section 60 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. PONCE, PR Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. RIO GRANDE DE ARECIBO, PR Project for flood control. RIO GRANDE DE LOIZA, PR Project for flood control. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 106-53 Aug. 17, 1999 106th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. 9-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 Apr. 1986 Report of the Chief Engineers Jan. 1989 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 31, 1992 RESTORATION PROJECTS WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 RIO GRANDE DE MANATI, BARCELONETA, PR Project for flood control. RIO NIGUA, SALINAS, PR Project for flood control. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR (See Section 62 of Text) Project for flood control. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR (See Section 61 of Text) Project for flood control. SAVAN GUT, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to $100,000. Set maximum amount allotted under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 at $10,000,000. TURPENTINE RUN, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FL (See Section 73 of Text) Conduct a feasibility study for the purpose of determining P modifications of the flood control project for central and southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176), which are necessary to provide a comprehensive plan for the environmental restoration. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 858, Jun. 30, 1948, 80th Cong, 2d sess. P.L.101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov.28,1990 101st Cong., 2d sess 9-78 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Report of the Project for the ecosystem restoration, to construct the headwaters Chief of Engineers revitalization project, and any modifications for the environmental Mar. 17, 1992 restoration of the Kissimmee River Basin, ensuring that implementation of the project to restore the Kissimmee River will maintain the same level of flood protection as is provided by the current flood control project. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (See Section 74 of Text) WRDA Project consists of a comprehensive plan for the purpose of Oct. 12, 1996 restoring, preserving, and protecting the South Florida ecosystem. The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection of water quality in, and the reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the Everglades. The comprehensive plan shall include such features as are necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the region, including flood control, the enhancement of water supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and Southern Florida project. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA WRDA The project for aquifer storage and recovery described in the Central Aug. 17, 1999 and Southern Florida Water Supply Study and House Document 369 P.L. 102-580,, Oct.31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104t Cong., P.L. 106-53 Aug. 17, 1999 106 t Cong., 1st sess. 9-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 38 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, FL Aguadilla Harbor, PR Aquatic Plant Control, FL (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL Bayport, FL3 Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL Cedar Keys Harbor, FL Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI6 Clearwater Pass, FL21 Courtnay Channel, FL 1 Crystal River, FL1 Everglades Harbor, FL1 Fajardo Harbor, PR3 Guayanes Harbor, PR 3 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL3 Hillsboro Inlet, FL24 Homosassa River, FL1 Horseshoe Cove, FL Hudson River, FL3 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL3 Key West Harbor, FL1 Kissimmee River, FL1' Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL" Largo Sound Channel, FL1"12 Little Manatee River, FL3"11' Manatee River, FL'5 New River, FL' Orange River, FL' Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin 3 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL"1'16 Pithlachascotee River, FL Rice Creek, FL' St. Petersburg Harbor, FL St. Thomas Harbor, VI3 Steinhatchee River, FL' Suwannee River, FL'5 Withlacoochee River, FL'5 1974 1968 1939 1972 1977 1964 1980 1940 1941 1964 1945 1945 1974 1965 1937 1977 1974 1963 1972 1931 1931 1966 1949 1970 1956 1962 1963 1946 1966 1973 1957 1983 1949 1940 1977 1969 $ 267,427 1,640,997 2 5,099,153 58,524 168,569s 303,317 46,349 7 22,846 25,000 221,509 8 38,850 3,999 9 347,521 9,889 243,079 1,548,89210 23,479 10,276 117,44313 11,90314 123,350 36,518 2,000 105,527 41,29717 400,00018 85,20819 255,60820 1,989 135,053 76,41822 614,91223 9-80 $ 2,093,668 182,108 54,969 76,023 60,967 1,568,252 26,779 152,208 51,034 26,454 581,758 28,046 534,623 112,954 9,035 51,149 194,516 31,296 24,918 15,089 60,686 261,401 18,814 1,942,22821 63,343 256,995 649,418 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 'Complete. 2 Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. 3 Inactive. SIncludes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. S Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6 Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. SExcludes $42,783 contributed funds. 8 Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9 In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. o1I0n cludes $27,500 for new work under previous project.Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. " Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12 Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13 Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14 Expended on restudy. 15 Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93- 251,Section 12. 16A uthorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 17 Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. 1 Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 9 Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 20 Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21 Includes $20,532 under previous project. 22 Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 23 Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 24 Authorized by Section 301, R&H Act of 1965 and Section 107 of P.L. 101-640. 9-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 54 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $34,862 $ El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 Lee County, FL 1971 - Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511 Palm Beach County, FL,FfLro,m Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 San Juan, PR 1965 TABLE 9-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 64 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485- Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection 2 1966 - - Hillsborough Bay, FL 2 1969 - - Phillippi Creek Basin, FL 2 1966 - - 1 Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. 2 Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 9-82 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA DISTRICT TABLE 9-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Project See Annual Report and Funds Funds For: Authority Expended Expended Central and Southern Florida - 1 Jan 90 - - (S.W. Dade Co. Area) WRDA 86 Central and Southern Florida - do - - (Boggy Creek Basin) Central and Southern Florida - 9 Jul 95 (Cutler Drainage Area) PL 99-662 - - Central and Southern Florida - (Hendry County) do - - Central and Southern Florida - (Martin County Recreation) do - - Central and Southern Florida - (Nicodemus Slough) do - - Central and Southern Florida - (Reedy Creek Swamp) do - - Central and Southern Florida - 1 Jan 90 - - (Small Boat Harbor) WRDA 86 Charlotte County, FL - 18 Nov 91 - - PL 99-662 Four River Basin (Anclote - 1 Jan 90 River C-532, S-552), FL WRDA 86 - - GIWW St. Marks to Tampa - do 38,850- Bay, FL Hillsboro Inlet (Broward - do - - County), FL Key West, FL -do 104,140- Mullet Key, FL do 436,201 187,133 9-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Project See Annual Report and Funds Funds For: Authority Expended Expended Palm Beach to Lake Worth Inlet (1950 Act) San Juan and Vicinity, PR 19 Jul 92 PL 99-662 1 Jan 90 WRDA 86 Virginia Key and do Key Biscayne, FL 195,140 781,188 13,774,968 100,000 1,667,220 714,522 9-84 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 37 of Text) Cost Incurred Project During Period Aguadilla Harbor, PR AIWW Norfolk to St. Johns Arecibo Harbor, PR Christiansted Harbor, VI Fort Myers Beach, FL Fort Pierce Harbor, FL Horseshoe Cove, FL Johns Pass, FL Miami Harbor, FL New Pass, Sarasota, FL Port Everglades Harbor, FL St. Augustine Harbor, FL St. Lucie Inlet, FL Withlacoochee River, FL Total 182,108 45,111 179,472 2,372 121,005 96,214 5,589 22,156 123,551 730 65,421 56,066 -10,337 28,908 $ 918,366 9-85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-I CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, FL Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock dimensions 909 wide; 6009 long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,979,670 '56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible TABLE 9-J Henry H. Buckman Lock and Dam Eureka Lock with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a Federal responsibility. R.N. Bert Dosh Dunellon Lock Lock Inglis Lock and Dam Nearest town (miles) Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions (ft.)'1 Normal lift (ft.) Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) Character of foundation Kind of dam Type construction Percent complete Estimated contract cost Palatka, 11.2 90.4 84 x 600 20 14 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Sparr, 15.8 111.4 84 x 600 20 17 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Ocala, 8.9 127.7 84 x 600 0-152 16-312 Piles in sand None 0 Dunnellon, Inglis, 2.5 3.2 156.5 84 x 600 12-272 16-312 Rock None 0 $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 'Clear width and greatest available length. 2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. SWith concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-86 CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) 168.6 84 x 600 28 18 Rock Movable Earth3 100 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-L OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of locks, dams, and reservoirs $ 1,216,100 Operation of service utilities -19,400 Operation of flood control structures 33,700 Operation of power plants 256,800 Natural resource management 490,900 Recreation management -1,500 Water Control Management 0 Condition and operation studies and activities 1,100 Real estate management 1,120,400 National emergency peparedness program 4,500 Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposits 26,000 General regulatory functions 124,000 Construction Management -700 Sub-Total 3,249,700 Maintenance: Lands and damages 0 Maintenance of locks -2,400 Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds -800 Maintenance of recreational facilities 0 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment non-recreational -400 Channel and canal maintenance -3,800 Engineering and Design 0 Construction Management -2,400 Clearing accounts 0 Income Credits 7,900 Sub-Total -1,900 Total $ 3,260,515 9-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-M REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 31 of Text) Locality Cost Channel and canal maintenance Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs Operation of power plants Operation of service facilities Natural resource management Recreation management Water control management Condition and operation study Real estate management Project operations management Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds Engineering and Design Construction Management $ 3,800 45,400 0 10,000 0 100 400 200 5,199,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total $ 5,259,768 9-88 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1999 (See Section 56 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Levees: Upper St. Johns L-79 Flowway; S-253 June 1995 - October 1996 July 1997 Upper St. Johns L-77 Flowway; L-77 Levee March 1996 - November 1996 July 1997 Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) September 1995 July 1997 Upper St. Johns Site F - Malabar Rd. (Rec) September 1995 July 1997 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1999 (See Section 56 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Levees: Hwy. 512 and Fellsmere Access March 1997 100 Upper St. Johns S-252 Flowway; S-252D April 1997 99 SJWMA Improvements July 1997 99 9-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-Q CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 56 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual No. Name (miles) (feet) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, FL 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, FL 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, FL 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, FL 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, FL 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector Gate gates and have no lift. No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. TABLE 9-R CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 56 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution' Jun. 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sep. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 Jul. 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 66.3 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 P.L. 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for under provisions of recreational craft 50.0 Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act (Deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 by P.L. 99-662) P.L. 99-662 Upper St. Johns River Basin - non-structural flood protection 25.0 1 Computed on total contract cost and supervision and Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation and design and land. 9-90 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 56 of Text) Work Performed New Work: Lands and damage Channels and canals Levees Pumping plants Recreation Floodway control and diversion structures Feasibility Engineering and Design Construction Management Total cost Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system Operation of service facilities Operation of flood control structures Operation of power plants Natural resource management Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies Roads, railroads, and bridges Water control management National preparedness program General regulatory Real estate management Project operations management Sub-Total 1,163,900 4,682,300 -10,100 365,300 242,300 13,700 0 0 -6,800 2,576,500 149,600 940,100 -1,200 $ 10,115,600 Maintenance: Lands and damages Maintenance of dams Maintenance of locks Pumping plant maintenance Maintenance of levees and floodwalls Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Bank stabilization 9-91 0 -900 -700 0 -209 0 -400 0 Cost 40,700,000 3,486,000 450,000 2,906,000 -10,000 521,000 3,302,000 9,378,000 573,000 $ 61,306,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 56 of Text) Work Performed Cost Utilities, supplies, and maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds -342 Channel and canal maintenance 0 Engineering and Design -300 Construction Management -2,200 Clearing accounts 13,300 Sub-Total $ 8,249 Total $10,073,397 9-92 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-T FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1999 (See Section 59 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period For Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Bridge, B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. lA C-135, Sec. lB C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 May 1971 - Jan 1973 Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Jul 1966 - Aug 1967 May 1968 - Sep 1972 Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 Dec 1972 - Apr 1975 Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 Apr 1976- Jan 1979 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1966 - Jan 1969 Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 Mar 1985 - Jul 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. Jul 1975 Dec 1968 Oct 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov 1977 Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Sep 1968 Apr 1969 Nov 1971 Dec 1968 Nov 1977 Apr 1977 Nov 1968 Dec 1975 Not transferred Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Oct 1980 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Oct 1981 Jan 1985 Dec 1986 9-93 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TH ARMY ON CIVIL ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 9-U FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 59 of Text) Nearest town 20 miles Name of nearest town Ocala, FL Distance above mouth of river 65.5 miles Lock dimensions 30 x 125 feet Normal lift 18.0 feet Elevation of normal pool surface 58 feet Depth of sills 12 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Kind of dam None Type of construction Reinforced concrete Percent complete 100 Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) $1,990,138 TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 65 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Black Creek, FL Cedar Creek, Jax, FL Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL Christopher Creek, FL Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI Goodbys Creek, Jax, FL Government Center - N. Miami Bch, FL Hwy 187, El Terraplen Itchapackasassa Creek, Polk Co., FL LaGrange Gut,Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI Ortega River, FL Ponce Regional, PR Pottsburg Creek, Jax, FL Quebrada Blasinia, PR Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR Rio Coamo, Parcelas Valezquez, PR Rio Cidra, La Playita, PR Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR Rio Culebras, Aguada, PR Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR $ 25,892 1,678,357 106 0 0 4,114 0 0 0 3,121 1,914 0 0 0 0 87,803 7,730 0 0 16,313 0 0 104 9-94 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 65 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Rio Fajardo, PR 462,096 Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR 1,663 Rio Jacaguas at Juana Dizz, PR 0 Rio Loco, Guanica, PR 2,951 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR 40,496 Rio Nigua, Arroyo, PR 0 Rio Orocovis, PR 0 Rio Patillas, PR 10,268 Rio Yauco, Yauco, PR 0 Sabana Grande, PR 0 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI 169,470 Soto Town, St. Thomas, VI 0 Spanish Pond, FL 0 Streams in Jacksonville, FL 14,441 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI 2,990 W. Maule Lake - N. Miami Bch, FL 0 Wahneta Canal, Polk Co., FL 0 West Palm Beach, M-Canal, FL 0 Whitaker Bayou, FL 68,020 Sec 205 Coordination Account 4,416 9-95 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River IMPROVI Navigation Page 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA .............. 10-3 1A. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL ...................... 10-3 lB. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL ................................................ 10-4 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL.................................... 10-4 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA .......................... 10-4 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam , AL & GA ............................................ 10-5 4. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) .................................... 10-6 5. Bayou Coden, AL ......................................... 10-6 6. Bayou La Batre, AL ..................................... 10-7 7. Biloxi Harbor, M S ....................................... 10-7 8. Black Warrior and Tombigbee R ivers, A L .................................................... 10-8 8A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL ......... 10-9 8B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL ....................................... 10-9 9. Bon Secour River, AL .................................. 10-9 10. Carrabelle Harbor, FL ................................ 10-10 11. Dauphin Island, AL .................................... 10-10 12. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL .......................... 10-11 13. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL .................... 10-11 14. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL ............................ 10-11 15. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border .... 10-12 16. Gulfport Harbor, MS ................................. 10-12 17. Mobile Harbor, AL .................................... 10-13 18. Panama City Harbor, FL ............................ 10-13 19. Pascagoula Harbor, MS ............................. 10-14 20. Pensacola Harbor, FL ................................ 10-15 21. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ......................... 10-15 Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. Page 22. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS .................................. 10-15 22A. Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS .................. 10-16 23. Other Authorized Navigation Projects..................................... 10-17 24. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project............................................ 10-17 25. Other Authorized Flood Control Project ............................................ 10-17 26. Deauthorized Projects ................................ 10-17 27. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................ 10-17 28. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................ 10-17 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................................ 10-17 30. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 10-17 Flood Control 31. Black Warrior River Northport Levee, AL .................................. 10-17 32. Cedar Point Seawall Bay St. Louis, M S ...................................... 10-17 33. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, A L and FL .................................................. 10-18 33A. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, Elba and Geneva Levees, AL......................10-18 34. Okatibbee Lake, M S .................................. 10-18 35. Threemile Creek, M obile, A L ................................................. 10-19 36. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL ............................... 10-19 10-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Flood Control Page 37. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL ................................ 10-19 38. Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, M S ......................................... 10-20 39. Village Creek, Birmingham , AL ........................................ 10-20 40. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 10-20 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................... 10-20 42. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................ 10-21 Multiple Purpose Power Projects 43. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA .............................. 10-21 44. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA ............................. 10-21 45. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA ................ 10-22 46. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam , FL & GA .......................................... 10-22 47. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL .............. 10-22 48. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL .......... 10-23 49. Walter F. George Lock and Dam , AL & GA .......................................... 10-23 50. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA....... 10-24 Miscellaneous 51. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................................. 10-24 52. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE)..............................10-25 53. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ........................................ 10-25 54. Regulatory Functions Program .................. 10-25 55. Project Modification to Improve Environment .............................. 10-25 56. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Sec. 206).......................10-25 57. Other Aquatic Habitat (Sec. 204).......................10-25 General Investigations Page 58. Surveys 10-25 59. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 10-25 60. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.... 10-25 61. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds ..................................... 10-26 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-J Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Cost & Financial Statement ........... 10-27 Authorizing Legislation .................. 10-33 Other Authorized Navigation Projects......................... 10-43 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project ................. 10-43 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-44 Deauthorized Projects .................... 10-45 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................... 10-45 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 10-46 Reconnaisssance and Condition Surveys ........................................... 10-47 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project ............................. 10-47 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA, & FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included in Existing Projects ......... 10-48 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ...................................... 10-49 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, A L & M S ....................................... 10-50 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1988 Thru FY 1998 ........... 10-51 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Navigation 1. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement includes the construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $1,275,377. Claiborne Lock and Dam charges were $3,205,287. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in June 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is complete in Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $117,423,308, including $3,245,400 for new work and $114,177,908 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 1A. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 72.5 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The existing project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60- mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $3,205,287. 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. Recreation attendance during FY 1999 totaled 188,000 visits. lB. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Ooostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $14,986,400 for new work. 2. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and 9 feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $63,294; contract dredging $421,923; supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $479,833. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $2,033,461 for new work and $6,317,133 for maintenance, a total of $8,350,594. 3. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. The Florida River enters the Apalachicola from the east at mile 45.4 and the River 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia. Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were deauthorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage are provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A Comprehensive Basin Study is currently being conducted on the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, Flint (ACF), and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) River Systems. Local cooperation. The six Florida Counties that originally served as local sponsors for the Florida portion of the waterway have all informed the District in writing that they no longer wish to serve as local sponsors. The State of Florida has also declined assumption of responsibilities of local sponsorship. At this time no items of local cooperation are being complied with. No local sponsors are required for the Alabama and Georgia portions of the waterway. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $2,040,946. Operation and maintenance cost $3,124,815. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock and Dam and West Point are complete. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $4,452,162 for new work and $130,201,070 for maintenance, a total of$134,653,232. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 3A. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963 at a total cost of$13,038,427. (See also Table 10-M). 4. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The existing project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Environmental studies amounted to $15,829. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the exiting project as of September 30, 1999 is $937,440. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 5. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence 8 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned timber dock piles used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A small ship building facility is located near the upper limits of the channel. The marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging $200,000 and miscellaneous cost amounted to $17,077. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $330,701 for new work and $1,904,846 for maintenance, a total of $2,235,547. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $134,340 for maintenance. 6. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, AL., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 18- foot by 120-foot channel from Pascagoula Ship channel, connecting with the GIWW, along the GIWW alignment, connecting with an extension of the previous 12-foot channel alignment, through Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, a total distance of approximately 20 miles; then provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, the plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 100-foot from the mouth through the turning basin, a distance of about 1.8 miles; deepen channel from turning basin to 0.29 miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-feet by 75-feet, a distance of about 0.89 miles; extend a 14-foot by 50-foot channel from turning basin into Snake Bayou for about 730 feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou about 790 feet. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Several boatways for construction of small seagoing vessels are also available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $10,663. Maintenance: Condition Surveys and miscellaneous cost $93,788. Dredging cost $4,501,389. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. The contract for deepening the Sound Channel was completed in May 1994. The construction of the Bayou Channel was completed in September 1997. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $5,788,354 for new work and $10,806,509 for maintenance, a total of $16,594,863. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $697,500. 7. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The existing project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100- foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12-by 150- foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of November 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in February 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet, for use by commercial small craft, and an East Harrison County Canal project which provides for a 12-foot project depth, 130- feet wide and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-and-timber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $513,140 and condition surveys cost $6,039. Water quality studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $25,452. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $1,431,919 for new work and $15,398,261 for maintenance, a total of $16,830,180. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 8. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 430 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new 110-by 600-foot locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock located 2,300 feet downstream has been completed. The replacement lock has dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provision was provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to Coffeeville Lock and Dam, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at old lock 1, which is 100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufacturers, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design cost supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $19,702,560. Recreation attendance FY 1999 totaled 4,049,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1,2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam and Holt Lock and Dam, was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Construction of the new Oliver Lock and Dam is completed with the new lock open to traffic as of July 1991. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in January 1996. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $88,461,935 for new work and $396,820,300 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 and major rehabilitation, a total of $537,575,115. 8A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 by 300 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the district has been directed to construct a spur canal to serve as a port at Jackson. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement requirements have not been determined. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $591,457. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is scheduled for completion in January 2000 and the project is scheduled for contract award in March 2000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1999 is $2,500,546. 8B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 337.7 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The existing navigation facilities on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee include six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Each of the locks have chamber dimensions of 110 by 600 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks. Previously, Oliver Lock was the only lock in the system with chamber dimensions of 95 by 460 feet. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the plan of improvement was to replace Oliver Lock and Dam at a new location 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock with chamber dimensions by 110 by 600 feet was opened to traffic in July 1991. The fixed crest spillway, extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions are being provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land Acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987 and the lock and dam construction contract was awarded in March 1988. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design -$12,938. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 1999 is $61,373,113 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $63,128,156. 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 9. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Also a 10 by 80 foot South Fork channel from the intersection with the Bon Secour channel, 1.14 miles to a 150 x 150 foot turning basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $150,615 for new work and $1,493,707 for maintenance, a total of $1,644,322. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 10. CARRABELLE HARBOR, FLORIDA Location. Carrabelle Bar and Harbor is located 50 miles south, southeast of Tallahassee, Florida, on St. George Sound and the Gulf of Mexico. Existing Project. The existing project provides for a 27- by 200-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico for 3 miles to a point west of Dog Island, thence a 25- by 150-foot channel for 5 miles through St. George Sound and Carrabelle River to a turning basin 500 feet square and 25 feet deep at the town of Carrabelle, a 10- by 100-foot channel from turning basin for 0.6 mile to U.S. 98 bridge, thence a 10- by 80-foot channel for 3 miles to the confluence of New and Crooked Rivers. Plane of reference is mean low water. Channels above the turning basin were authorized May 17, 1965 by Chief of Engineers under authority in Section 107 of the River and HarborAct of July 14, 1960. Other features of existing project were authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet, and extreme is 3.0 feet, exclusive of storms. Local Cooperation. Items of local cooperation have been furnished by the Board of County Commissioners, Franklin County, Florida. Terminal Facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for the current needs of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Miscellaneous cost of $1,160. Condition at end of fiscal year. All new work for this project was completed in 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 is $481,627 for new work and $1,033,205 for maintenance, a total of $1,514,832. 11. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous cost $2,429. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $292,864 for new work and $2,787,361 for maintenance, a total of $3,080,225. 12. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel with a total length of 4.5 miles to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The Fowl River project provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging, environmental studies and compliance cost $200,000, and miscellaneous cost $30,735. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel realignment was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $4,381,338; $391,354 for new work and $3,989,984 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,626. 13. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12- foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging cost $713,984; supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $22,495. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $916,715 for new work and $13,803,377 for maintenance, a total of $14,720,092. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 14. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Alabama, 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Alabama. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging cost $100,000; supervision and administration and miscellaneous cost $13,019. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1999 amounted to $995,061 of which $29,000 was for new work and $966,061 for maintenance. 15. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land custs. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $5,124,792. Condition surveys, water quality studies, supervision and administration totaled $1,989,072. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is completed except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 is $100,570,696, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $94,090,397 for maintenance. 16. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747. Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986, and further amended by WRDA 1988 to modify the existing ship channel to 36 by 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 by 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 91 construction appropriation provided for constructing an increment of the authorized project and provide a 36 by 220 feet channel in Mississippi Sound and 38 by 300 feet across the bar. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $3,632. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $1,828,232. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $366,352. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Awarded thin-layer monitoring contract in June 1991 under the authority of WRDA 1986 and 1988. The channel contract was awarded in April 1992, thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $24,176,006 for new work and $55,645,136 for maintenance, a total of 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT $88,809,118. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $8,987,976. 17. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower 5 miles of Mobile River, and channel extends thru Mobile Bay and into Gulf of Mexico, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 47-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel serving the Theodore Industrial Park 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6,500 feet and terminating in a 300- by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channel is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project for the first increment of work. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and Design $187,937. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $27,372,621. Condition surveys cost $532,770. Water quality studies, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $4,376,016. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the project modification was completed in June 1990. Current estimated Federal cost is $218,548,000, and non-Federal cost is $178,452,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $96,551,237 for new work and $289,569,360 for maintenance, a total of $386,120,597. Contributed funds expended amounted to $19,074,226 for new work. 18. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in St. Andrew bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to highway bridge. Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging cost $471, 476 and other miscellaneous costs totaled $19,179. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $1,638,045 for new work and $13,502,494 for maintenance, a total of $15,140,539. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 19. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound into the Gulf of Mexico, in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge; via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Further authorization provides for deepening and widening gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and Design cost $223,855. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $1,632,441. Condition surveys cost $125,274. Water quality studies, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $269,605. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992 for deepening and widening channels. Preconstruction 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Engineering and Design is complete. The channel dredging contract was awarded in September 1994. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 1999 is $14,946,082 for new work and $68,445,813 for maintenance, a total of $83,391,895. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $6,303,757. 20. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33- foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance:Environmental studies costs totaled $31,114. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,469,397 for maintenance, a total of $9,907,976. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $297,587. 21. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida, and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging cost $1,102,324, condition surveys and miscellaneous costs totaled $64,786. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in May 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 is $629,860 for new work and $11,079,044 for maintenance, a total of$11,708,904. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 22. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks and consists of three sections as follows: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width is 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River. 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 The total lift of 341 feet is accomplished by 10 locks (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have made and are maintaining alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with theUnited States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 of finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30,1998, twelve such facilities were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $28,140. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $2,452,608. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 99 amounted to $20,477,441, which included general charges of $15,326,720. Recreation costs totaled $2,698,113. Recreation attendance for FY 1999 totaled 3,125,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $1,053,069,081 for new work, and $304,529,709 for maintenance for a total of $1,357,598,790. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. There is currently one (1) recreational contract underway on the project. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 22A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION PROJECT, AL AND MS Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at the following locations: (1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres of Tennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Lakes in Alabama and at Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. (2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama (not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. Previous project. None. This project was a new construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Existing project. The authorized project calls for the acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) assisted in the selection of separable lands. The selected lands are being purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. Emphasis is placed on forested wetlands, with a minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being purchased. Management of Lands, the separable lands and the existing project lands designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing these lands in accordance with management plans jointly developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps to retain management responsibility for some of the existing project lands included in the mitigation program. 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal responsibility. Operation and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition cost $1,541,508. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the project was received in January 1990. At the end of September 1998, 21,182 acres had been acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta; 13,433 acres in the Pascagoula Basin; 18,542 acres in the Mississippi Delta; 7,655 acres in the Pearl Basin; 14,378 acres in northeast Mississippi; and 12,292 acres in other areas of Alabama. A variety of activities also continued to intensively manage the 92,600 acres of existing project lands included in the Mitigation Program. The total project cost is estimated to be $94,042,000. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1999 is $90,901,386. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) 26. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-H.) 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $32,190 in FY 1998. (See Table 10-H.) 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-J.) 30. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) FLOOD CONTROL 31. BLACK WARRIOR RIVER NORTHPORT LEVEE PROJECT, NORTHPORT, ALABAMA Location. The city of Northport is located along the Black Warrior River north and across the river from the city of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The damage center of Northport is also about 60 miles west of the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. The project consists of a 3.2 mile levee construction to provide flood protection for the city of Northport, Alabama from over bank flows from the Black Warrior River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract cost $1,316,189; supervision and administration cost $14,988 and other miscellaneous cost $61,441. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is scheduled for completion in March 2000. The total project construction costs is $5,979,000. Of this amount, the Federal share is $4,480,500 and the non-Federal share is $1,498,500. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1999 is $4,543,987 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $259,865. 32. CEDAR POINT SEAWALL BAY ST. LOUIS, MS Location. The project is located in the city of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. It is on St. Louis Bay about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline erosion project provides for construction of a 1,500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete will be placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing concrete seawall. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction cost $1,224; and reconnasissance and feasbility studies $57,549. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was authorized on September 9,1998, with contract awarded in November 1999. Total Federal cost to date is $394,060 for new work. Contributed funds expended amounted to $192,000 for new work. 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 33. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, ALABAMA AND FLORIDA Location. The Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins are located in southeast, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head water of the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located approximately 48 miles south from the head water of the Choctawhatchee River. Existing project. The project consists of the installation of 12 combination rain and stream gages and two raw gages within the Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. The base stations are located at Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The project is being upgraded to add one additional base station at New Brockton, Alabama. The flood warning system provides early warning time ranging between 18 to 36 hours. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $85,688. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in September 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $351,237 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $98,894. 33A. CHOCTAWHATCHEE AND PEA RIVERS MINOR REHABILITATION PROJECTS ELBA AND GENEVA LEVEES, ALABAMA Location. The minor levee rehabilitation projects are located in the cities of Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head waters along the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located at the confluence of the Pea River and the Choctawhatchee River, which is about 48 miles south from the headwaters of the Choctawhatchee River. Existing project. The Elba and Geneva projects consists of a 3.2 mile and a 2.7 mile long earthen levee system respectively, which were constructed by the Works Project Administration (WPA) in 1938. Project rehabilitation work consists of replacing or repairing culverts flap gates, installing sluice gates on the inside of the levee and clearing the underbrush along the levee side slopes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract cost $334,493 and engineering analysis cost $794. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is scheduled for completion in January 2000. The total project construction cost for the two projects is $1,195,800. Of this amount, the Federal share is $822,800 and the non-Federal share is $443,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1999 is $680,743 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $209,960. 34. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,507,877. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during FY 1999 totaled 978,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $9,739,528 for new work and $26,441,309 for maintenance, a total of $36,180,837. 35. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Reimbursable funding $43,484. Engineering and design cost $3,430. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and has been turned over to the local sponsor. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1999 is $17,384,782 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,172,516. 36. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of the Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1963 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $139,923. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $134,801 for new work and $3,980,808 for maintenance, a total of $4,115,609. 37. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Luxapalila Creek project consists of 2.1 miles of completed channel modifications. The remaining effort consists of approximately 26 miles of various channel work. Approved estimate of cost for new work is $42,108,000; consisting of $37,743,000 Federal funds, and $4,365,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $1,107,718. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Total project is 98% complete. Luxapalila Creek is the only remaining work scheduled to be accomplished. The main construction contract was awarded in June 1994, and was completed in December 1997. The only remaining work involves a "clean-up" contract of the lower 2.1 mile segment that was completed in 1973 before litigation delayed the remaining work. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $39,239,787 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $554,391. 38. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. The work will consist of real estate acquisition of eight (8) residences and removal from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $17,806. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in April 1994, and construction was completed in April 1995. Necessary right-of-ways for channel improvement are available and necessary relocations performed by non-federal sponsors. Also, acquisition of twenty-one (21) residences for mitigation is underway. Total Federal cost to date is $3,846,953 for new work. Contributed funds expended $130,689. 39. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwamrning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 642 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. The channel segment is not being constructed at the request of the sponsor. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was executed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $52; engineering and design, $4,613. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum completed February 1988. Real Estate acquisition started January 1989. The project is complete with acquisition of 634 tracts. Current estimated Federal cost is $26,912,000; and the non-Federal portion is $10,388,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1999 is $22,864,904 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $7,203,102. 40. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pond and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 91 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $23,184. Total cost to September 30, 1999 is $807,867 charged to maintenance. 42. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Multiple Purpose Power Projects 43. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation ofstreamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twentysix feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twentysix feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $5,514,680. Gross power generation amounted to 80,648,600 kilowatt hours during FY 1999 of which 77,890,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at Allatoona Lake during FY 1999 totaled 5,678,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $35,709,085 for new work and $129,827,400 for maintenance, a total of $165,536,485. 44. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,881,663. Gross power generation amounted to 98,880,000 kilowatt 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 hours during FY 1999, of which 93,982,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during FY 1999 totaled 7,665,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $53,030,038 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $1,459,405 and $161,198,078 for maintenance, a total of $215,687,521. (See also Table 10- M.) 45. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Oakman, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950- foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum pool power elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $5,064,240. Gross power generation amounted to 389,745,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1999, of which 158,249,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1999 totaled 632,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 and completed in September 1980. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $195,206,316, including $111,140,340 for new work and $84,065,976 for maintenance. 46. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GAAND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $7,794,899. Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted to 168,720,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1999, of 10-22 _ MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT which 166,675,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during FY 1999 totaled 2,053,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first powergenerating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $47,978,858 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $9,123,423 and $118,832,007 for maintenance, a total of $175,934,288. (See also Table 10-M.) 47. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains two 25,000 kilowatt units and one 30,000 kilowatt unit. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description ofAlabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $6,089,150. Gross power generation amounted to 361,409,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1999, of which 355,455,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during FY 1999 totaled 1,697,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1999 is $63,125,300 for new work and $85,045,625 for maintenance, a total of $148,170,925. 48. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The existing project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 20,500-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $5,351,539. Gross power generation amounted to 305,560,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1999, of which 301,507,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1999 totaled 1,547,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1999 is $146,936,100, including $83,360,800 for new work and $63,575,300 for maintenance. 49. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1999 was $6,089,150. Gross power generation amounted to 282,177,000 kilowatt hours, of which 274,201,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1999 totaled 6,624,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe- line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $88,330,669 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $13,943,481 and $151,254,522 for maintenance, a total cost of $253,528,672. (See also Table 10-M.) 50. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The existing project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acre-feet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $6,051,989. Gross power generation amounted to 100,471,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1999, of which 93,519,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1999 totaled 2,265,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, and completed at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1999 is $131,565,760 for new work and $99,464,435 for maintenance, a total of $231,030,195 (See also Table 10-M.) 51. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior- Tombigbee Rivers System. 52. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program ............................ $583,695 Emergency Operations............................................ 535,041 R ehabilitation ................................................................. -0- Miscellaneous Reimbursable ............................... 7,727,716 Total FC & CE $8,846,452 53. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) National Preparedness ........................................... $60,466 Emergency Water Preparedness ................................ 12,908 Emergency Facilities ................................................. 2,092 Total NEPP $75,466 54. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation .............................................. $1,908,375 Enforcem ent........................................................... 552,839 Studies ....................................................................... 2,268 Other Navigational Regulations ................................. 2,119 Coastal Mississippi EIS ............................................ 16,854 Total Regulatory $2,452,455 55. PROJECT MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT (Sec. 1135) Mayo's Bar, Floyd Co., GA ................................. $19,319 Coordination Account Funds ................................. 11,044 Initial A ppraisals .................................................... 59,332 Lake Seminole Habitat .......................................... 57,285 Twentymile Creek Habitat, MS ............................. 23,224 Demopolis Lake Waterfowl ................................... 33,839 Total Improvement (Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662) $204,043 56. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SEC. 206) Big Escambia Creek .............................................. $18,814 Coordination Account Funds .................................... 10,000 Gulf Breeze Wetlands .............................................. 27,155 Preliminary Restoration Plans ................................. 39,037 Total Restoration (Sec. 206, P.L. 104-303) $95,006 57. OTHER AQUATIC HABITAT (SEC. 204) Bayou Casotte ........................................................ $43,136 Total Other Aquatic (Sec. 204, P.L. 102-560) $43,136 General Investigations 58. SURVEYS During FY 1999, costs of $1,389,854 were incurred as shown below: Flood Damage Preventive Studies ........................ $125,356 Navigation Studies .................................................. 468,717 Special Studies....................................................... 560,196 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests.......................................... 94,870 M iscellaneous Activities......................................... 140,715 Total Surveys $1,389,854 59. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management Services were performed at a cost of $577,181 and $2,170 expended for Hydrologic Studies. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1999.) 60. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS. The authorized plan provides for deepening the existing industrial channel from 7 by 100 feet to 8 by 100 feet for about 4 1/2 miles from the end of the 200 by 800 foot turning basin to the 8-foot depth contour in St. Louis Bay. Plans and specifications were initiated in January 1997 and were completed in November 1999. Estimate Preconstruction, 10-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Engineering and Design cost is $500,000. Fiscal year 1999 expenditures were $30,499. Total FY 1998 expenditures for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) were $30,499. 61. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS (GENERAL INVESTION) Contributed funds expended for authorized Federal studies included: Atlanta Sewer, GA .................................................... $1,224 Pascagoula Harbor, MS ............................................. 44,792 Planning Assistance to States ...................................... 8,548 Total Contributed Funds $54,564 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 Navigation 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA 1A. Claibomrne Lock and Dam, AL 1B. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 4. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 5. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 4,357,300 88,337 90,000 93,327 5,433,000 5,554,039 30 30 30,000 28,038 16,000 12,313 84,357 297,000 227,956 43,000 39,721 71,000 278,600 284,012 5,514,980 5,519,831 228,000 185,911 4,311,283 4,298,317 30 30 38,891 511,100 444,755 80,340 1,763,000 1,612,688 1,805,000 1,723,601 74,235 1,109,000 1,074,719 4,661,000 4,604,697 -8,000 37,483 6,059,500 6,050,362 30 30 8,796 -68,000 4,805 25,000 54,123 317,500 371,420 100,000 162,034 537,000 563,709 4,331,000 4,451,309 963,410 965,050 5,092,390 5,165,761 15,829 221,300 217,077 4,000 10,663 4,563,100 4,595,177 526,600 544,631 3,245,400 3,245,400 114,206,16824 114,177,90824 27,997,450 27,997,450 14,986,40023 14,986,40023 2,033,461' 2,033,461' 6,319,4682 6,317,1332 4,452,16226 4,452,16226 130,231,43727 130,201,07027 13,038,42729 13,038,42729 969,187 937,440 21,225 21,225 330,7013 330,7013 1,909,158 1,904,846 100,000 100,000 134,357 134,340 5,971,095 5,788,354 10,809,346 10,806,509 697,5004 697,5004 1,431,9195 1,431,9195 15,398,3956 15,398,2616 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 (Contributed Funds) 8. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 8A. Jackson Port Jackson, AL 8B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement), AL (Contributed Funds) 9. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 11. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL (Contributed Funds) 12. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 13. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctwhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib.- Cost - (Contributed Funds) Maint.: Contrib.- Cost - New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. 16,531,000 Cost 6,664,516 Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. 129,000 Cost 81,955 New Work: Approp. Cost 719,120 New Work: Contrib. Cost 619,310 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. 10,000 Cost 5,480 New Work: Contrib. Cost- New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. 253,000 Cost 250,154 New Work: Contrib. Cost- New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. 675,000 Cost 676,095 Maint.: Contrib. Cost- New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. 1,057,000 Cost 1,038,915 New Work: Contrib. Cost 18,916,779 19,583,480 318,000 233,483 58,395 20,379,990 20,603,059 563,000 514,582 1,206 74,658 19,514,000 19,702,560 715,000 591,457 -12,938 664,125 677,143 -1,500 -300 1,160 1,800 2,429 230,000 230,735 102,600 102,600 238,640 238,640 88,461,935' 88,461,935' 396,958,8638 396,820,300O 8 52,292,880 52,292,880 2,831,000 2,500,546 61,409,000 61,373,113 63,164,125 63,128,156 150,615 150,615 1,493,758 1,493,707 9,700 9,700 481,627 481,627 1,034,085 1,033,205 292,864 292,864 2,787,426 2,787,361 41,422 41,422 391,354 391,354 3,989,986 3,989,984 197,450 195,626 916,715 916,715 13,803,461 13,803,377 398,000 398,000 70,000 80,168 47,000 9,670 75,000 64,398 66,000 76,070 14,000 13,614 533,000 570,695 -11,000 4,335 48,000 48,086 376 974,850 1,037,542 -9,000 9,703 735,500 736,479 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) Se Se in 14 re ction Text Project . Fly Creek, AL 15. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border 16. Gulfport Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 17. Mobile Harbor, AL (Contributed Funds) 18. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 19. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19A. Bayou Casotte, MS 20. Pensacola Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 - - - - 29,000 - - - - 29,000 103,000 102,106 3,985,000 4,048,591 109,725 1,579,700 1,643,962 1 6,152 19,570,000 20,344,111 65,000 10,000 674,000 706,189 2,179,000 2,374,696 1,621,000 1,644,907 525,000 2,473,061 365,000 547,343 304 75,000 55,456 4,680,090 4,644,492 100,000 27,005 1,995,000 1,678,098 8,500 31,598 5,810,000 5,810,074 30,034 443,000 744,059 131,977 100,000 104,360 20,554,000 20,520,942 43,650 2,729,000 2,727,876 550,000 574,454 3,035,900 2,799,202 -412,717 375,000 386,293 60,000 41,273 300,000 46,118 20,199,000 20,077,190 150,000 157,492 -27,000 -11,439 751,000 136,363 3,097,000 3,294,586 400,000 317,086 3,000 21,948 112,900 113,019 7,063,540 7,113,864 3,632 2,148,800 2,194,584 11,949 544,000 187,937 32,166,700 32,281,406 475,000 410,584 488,500 490,655 12,000,000 223,855 1,989,200 2,027,320 -15,896 -98,429 1,150,000 795,285 118,000 111,783 28,400 31,114 966,121 966,061 6,480,2999 6,480,299' 94,105,87610 94,090,39710 24,179,000" 24,176,006" 55,647,00212 55,645,13612 9,495,000 8,987,976 97,175,93513 96,551,237'3 289,817,040'a 289,569,360'14 19,142,500 19,074,226 1,638,04515 1,638,04515 13,502,51316 13,502,49416 80,000 80,000 27,385,985" 14,946,082" 68,449,69218 68,445,813'18 3,877,102 3,377,104 6,746,884 6,303,757 118,000 111,783 1,469,693"9 1,469,69319 8,469,75820 8,469,39720 312,350 297,587 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 21. Perdido Pass Channel, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 22A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Mitigation Flood Control 32. Black Warrior River Northport Levee, AL (Contributed Funds) 33. Cedar Point Seawall Bay St. Louis, MS 34. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL and FL (Contributed Funds) 34A. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, Elba and Geneva Levees, AL (Contributed Funds) 38. Okatibbee Dam, MS 40. Three Mile Creek, Mobile, AL (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost - - - - 629,860 - - - - 629,860 30,400 30,410 1,231,000 1,110,701 -45,000 5,083 1,092,500 1,167,110 11,079,117 11,079,044 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 -167,000 944,336 19,518,000 19,945,758 10,662,000 12,167,962 275,000 193,016 170,696 44,526 350,000 86,397 1,524,000 1,537,858 -40,000 54,909 925,000 1,028,697 21,849,010 21,965,942 3,351,000 5,822,930 3,198,000 129,018 299,000 4,711 7,500 36,560 2,487 46,723 -110,000 89,659 1,736,875 1,794,079 6,039 18,000 127,582 19,338,290 19,367,403 4,040,000 2,721,172 2,583,075 115,958 80,000 58,773 112,500 34,610 15,000 7,566 423,000 76,882 1,039 1,518,000 1,517,668 340,000 392,126 43,484 28,140 20,248,000 20,477,441 300,000 1,541,508 1,000,000 1,392,618 139,195 316,200 335,287 192,000 192,000 60,000 85,688 42,500 80 376,402 190,000 208,921 1,504,000 1,507,897 3,430 -43,484 -43,484 1,053,352,20021 1,053,069,08121 304,663,48522 304,529,70922 92,100,000 90,901,386 4,729,264 4,543,987 299,000 259,865 396,200 394,060 192,000 192,000 419,800 351,237 157,287 98,894 733,000 680,743 338,000 209,960 9,739,528 9,739,528 26,468,710 26,441,309 17,385,000 17,384,782 1,172,516 1,172,516 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 (Contributed Funds) 41. Tombigbee River (East Fork) MS and AL 42. Tombigbee River Tributaries, MS and AL (Contributed Funds) 43. Upper Gordon Creek Hattiesburg, MS (Contributed Funds) 44. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (Contributed Funds) Multiple Purpose Power Projects 49. Allatoona Dam, Coosa River Basin, GA 50. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA 51. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA 52. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA and FL 18,000 New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 95,000 118,761 5,228,000 4,950,043 255,000 274,980 225,000 247,722 50 295,000 258,930 -9,849 5,441,857 5,703,727 7,154,858 7,437,967 5,250,857 5,305,994 4,595,000 4,832,076 900,000 846,798 200,000 66,500 2,215,000 1,982,458 183,000 96,756 50,00 14,166 372,000 140,690 5,996 5,458,465 5,312,654 6,942,415 6,687,110 4,451,100 4,446,504 6,570,414 6,661,034 1,925,000 1,633,345 43,484 118,000 226,477 1,860,000 804,567 82,765 -50,000 10,348 20,000 45,863 6,864 5,357,500 5,549,977 6,297,000 6,506,257 980,000 711,615 4,532,790 4,544,616 7,075,000 6,614,769 2,896,000 1,004,297 -43,484 -43,484 116,000 139,923 250,000 1,107,718 6,423 -15,000 17,806 4,665 5,396,000 5,514,680 6,744,000 6,881,663 819,000 747,790 5,006,000 5,064,240 7,322,000 7,794,899 4,399,000 5,638,983 10-31 1,172,516 1,172,516 134,801 134,801 3,986,201 3,980,808 39,976,825 39,239,787 872,700 554,391 3,850,000 3,846,953 130,720 130,689 22,894,000 22,864,904 7,206,574 7,203,102 35,709,08525 35,709,08525 129,900,346 129,827,400 53,030,03828 53,030,03828 161,307,295 161,198,078 1,799,000 1,459,405 111,140,340 111,140,340 84,130,731 84,065,976 47,978,8583' 47,978,8583' 119,077,711 118,832,007 10,120,000 9,123,423 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sept. 30, 1999 53. Millers Ferry Lock New Work: and Dam, AL Approp. - - - - 63,125,300 Cost - - - - 63,125,300 Maint.: Approp. 4,126,857 7,901,440 6,184,350 6,720,000 85,101,858 Cost 4,176,137 7,958,569 6,182,153 6,089,150 85,045,625 54. Robert F. Henry New Work: Lock and Dam, AL Approp. - - - - 83,360,800 Cost - - - - 83,360,800 Maint.: Approp. 5,318,857 4,333,445 4,288,950 5,290,000 63,626,113 Cost 5,351,663 4,404,812 4,270,283 5,351,539 63,575,300 55. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. - - - - 88,330,66932 AL and GA Cost - - - - 88,330,66932 Maint.: Approp. 5,387,857 6,069,744 6,754,290 5,941,000 151,348,288 Cost 5,294,028 6,411,825 6,643,568 6,089,150 151,254,522 Major Rehab.: Approp. - 473,000 1,880,000 1,219,000 14,190,000 Cost - 314,884 904,004 2,106,592 13,943,481 56. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. - - - - 131,565,76033 Basin, GA and AL Cost - - - - 131,565,76033 Maint.: Approp. 5,847,857 5,311,110 5,190,000 5,649,000 99,480,875 Cost 6,067,778 5,524,045 4,792,049 6,051,989 99,464,435 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work Funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works Funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 1975' Aug. 11, 1983' Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 1969' Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 3, 1930 10-33 TABLE 10-B APALACHICOLA BAY, FL (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. Ten feet H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. 1st Sess. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot I1st Sess. depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep, and 100 feet I1st Sess. wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 2d Sess. 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 1 mile long, parallel to DPR (Sec. 107) shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern DPR (Sec. 107) end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a DPR (Sec. 107) total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 4 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., and La. 1st Sess. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Public law 87-874 87th Cong. Provided for continued research. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Increased non-federal cost-sharing from 30% to 50%. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) BAYOU CODEN, AL (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre 2d Sess. channel. DPR (Sec. 107) BAYOU LA BATRE, AL (See Section 6 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 2d Sess. 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. Deepen existing channel to 18 feet to the bridge; to 14 feet Water Resources above bridge, and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet. Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) BILOXI HARBOR, MS (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 20, 1938 Relocation of channel. Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' Aug. 15, 1985 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500 by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about I mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. A channel 12-feet deep; 130-feet wide and 2,100-feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot depth. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams, 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement on Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. 10-34 DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, P. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 May 16, 1963' Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 16, 1991 Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southern bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255. JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 8A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 1000 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation proejct. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 8B of Text) Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL (See Section 9 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 and 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. CARRABELLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance channel 27- by 200-foot, harbor channel 25- by 150-foot, turning basin 25- by 100-foot. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Deepen existing 4-foot channel to 7-feet and 40-feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay. 10-35 H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors and Committee Doc. 45 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 97, 377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1987 (P.L. 99-591) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 451, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Jun. 23, 1993 May 19, 1969' Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 23, 1942 Jun. 17, 1943 Work Authorized Provides 400 feet of stone protection along the shoreline near the pier and erosion protection for shoreline in the immediate vicinity of Fort Gaines. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 12 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 13 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 15 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL, TO MOBILE BAY, AL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Documents DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52. 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong., Ist Sess. 10-36 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 16 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. Modify of WRDA of 1986 and authorize disposal of dredged material in open waters of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 17 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point in Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basin and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Mazagine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of November 27, 1973 under authority contained in ER-l130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' by 1600'. 10-37 H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-676) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Congress, 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 18 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control) The Supplemental Appropriations Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 96th Cong., 10-38 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 11, 1983' Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 10-39 Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30-by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 by 80 feet extending abut 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an upland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 20 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvements of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 21 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 22 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 8, 1995 Sep. 5, 1997 Sep. 9, 1998 Sep. 11, 1995 Jan. 15, 1998 Aug. 5, 1995 Jul. 14, 1995 Jun. 12, 1997 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION (See Section 22A of Text) Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. BAYVIEW COURT, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 31 of Text) Provide a 700 linear-foot concrete block revetment for beach erosion protection. BLACK WARRIOR RIVER NORTHPORT LEVEE, AL (See Section 32 of Text) Provide flood protection for the city of Northport, Alabama from over bank flows from the Black Warrior River. CEDAR POINT SEAWALL, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 33 of Text) Construction of a 1,500 foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of existing concrete seawall. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, AL (See Section 34 of Text) Install fourteen (14) combination rain and stream gages within Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. CHOCTAWHATCHEE AND PEA RIVERS ELBA AND GENEVA LEVEES, AL (See Section 34A of Text) Replacing or repairing culverts flap gates, installing sluice gates on inside of levee and clearing underbrush. HANCOCK COUNTY SEAWALL, HANCOCK CO, MS (See Section 35 of Text) Provide a 990-foot timber bulkhead, two (2) feet in front of an existing concrete seawall for shoreline protection. KING CREEK, TUPELO, MS (See Section 36 of Text) Provide riprap, sheet pile, and gabion slope and stream channel protection. SAINT LOUIS BAY, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 37 of Text) Provide a 1,000 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an existing concrete seawall for beach erosion protection. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 39 of Text) Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. Development of recreation facilities. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 40 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. Documents Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 103) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) PDA (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) 10-40 I TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct. 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Apr. 12, 1995 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 10-41 TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 41 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 42 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 43 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 44 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. Authorized the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design Memorandum as a nonstructural element of the project. WAVELAND SEAWALL, WAVELAND, MS (See Section 45 of Text) Provide a 1,008 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall segment, and a 500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an existing concrete seawall. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA, Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 49 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 3 of Text) Development ofApalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Mar. 2, 1945 Special Report on Record in Oct. (P.L. 222) 77th Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Develoment Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Jan. 27, 1981' Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 May 19, 1953 Oct. 23, 1963 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. Modified the existing project to provide for 9- foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways in the course of routinue maintenance dredging; and to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, and maintain water-related public use and access facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 50 of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 3A of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL (See Section 52 of Text) Provided for recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 55 of Text) Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 56 of Text) Authorized construction for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-42 - L' Documents H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Public Works H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $330,433 Bluff Creek, MS' 1963 1,000 6,883 Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,461,915 Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000- Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,531,824 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 207,791 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000- Old Town Creek' 2 1887 3,000- Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA' 2 1907 32,656- Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 106,446 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 823,385 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,965,283 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 87,379 Tallapoosa River, AL2 1893 43,972- Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS 1988 500,500- Upper Chipola River, FL from Marianna to its' mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 96-157, 1st Session. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance2 Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 Panama City Beaches, FL Underway 7,825,186 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance= Alabama River at Montgomery, AL' 1965 $144,194 Armuchee Creek, GA 1966 115,547 Bayview Court, Bay St. Louis, MS 1998 247,400 Beaver Creek, MontezumaG, A 1958 149,815 Big Brown Creek, PrentisCso ., MS 1987 137,500 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS 1985 132,174 Black Creek, Gadsden, AL 1953 125,389 Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL 1986 181,500 Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL 1994 147,200 Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL 1987 178,600 Burketts Creek, Amory, MS 1984 1,366,454 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL 1988 206,600 Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL 1985 121,718 Clanton, AL 1964 274,024 Collinsville, AL 1940 71,119 County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 1992 116,800 County Road 55, Etowah Co., AL 1996 242,348 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL 1994 1,848,327 Dauphin Island Shoreline, AL 1996 352,479 East End Dauphin Island, AL 1996 318,580- Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL 1997 4,732,721- Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL 1994 368,000 Gadsden Water Treatment Plant, AL 1996 360,000 Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS 1988 91,500 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 1985 802,026 Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co, FL 1991 147,432 Hancock County Seawall, Hancock Co., MS 1998 307,000 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL 1990 71,000 Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS 1991 268,691 Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS 1982 238,219 Houston School Rd Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 1988 59,300 Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., MS 1992 52,803 Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL 1987 155,200 Kings Creek, Tupelo, MS 1998 499,930 Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA 1970 164,998 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS 1990 1,585,000 Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS 1986 231,618 - Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 1991 144,047- Maghy Creek, Columbus, MS 1991 156,508- Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS 1988 78,500 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA 1992 474,065- Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS 1994 157,340 Mound State Park, Moundville, AL 1994 789,000 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 1980 190,974- Murder Creek, Brewton, AL 1994 1,215,000- Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL 1986 903,474- Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS 1988 I119,500 Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS 1987 143,936 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 250,000 Portersville Bay East, Mobile Co., AL 1996 490,750 Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL 1946 649,280 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA 1994 870,000 Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA 1985 85,029 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA 1994 385,300 Rome, Coosa River, GA 1955 384,550 Saint Louis Bay, Bay St. Louis, MS 1998 237,400 Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL 1989 180,937 Silver Creek, Rome, GA 1992 604,719 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA 1990 1,538,555 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 1998 1,218,036 Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 1984 55,569 Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS 1988 81,000 Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS 1988 3,945,757 Tallahalia Creek, Laurel, MS 1996 641,058 Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe Co., MS 1996 331,323 Town Creek, Americus, GA 1965 340,409 Trim Cane Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 1984 145,519 Trussville, AL 1965 141,334 Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS 1986 215,860 West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA 1955 599,637 Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL 1991 448,956 Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 114,753 Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1986 154,641 Yellow Jacket Creel Hosansville. GA 1966 330734 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no construction work has been 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. done. Includes $17,000 for pre-authorization studies.) 10-44 TABLE 10-G Project Bayou Galere, MS' Buttahatchee Creek, MS2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Coosa River Channel, Gadsden, AL to Rome, GA (Auth. 1945 Act) GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, FL Lazer Creek Lake, GA Little Browns Creek, AL2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Lower Auchumpkee Creek, GA Noxubee River, MS2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Pensacola Harbor Modification, FL Sipsey River, AL2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Tombigbee River, AL & MS2 (Auth. 1941 Act) Westfork, MS2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Type Navigation Flood Control Navigation Navigation Hydroelectric power Flood Control Hydroelectric power Flood Control Navigation Flood Control Flood Control Flood Control Year of Last Date Year of Last Full Report 1946 1989 1955 1986 1986 1989 1986 1989 1986 1989 n/a 1989 Deauthorization Document H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 1st Sess., as amended. Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-C. 2. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal year Study Authority 1999 Costs Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 14,103 Bayou Casotte 107 68,649 Old Pass Lagoon, Destin, FL 107 19,297 Section 107 Coordination Account 107 1,998 Total 104,047 10-45 Date Deauthorized Aug. 5, 1977 Jul. 9, 1995 Aug. 18, 1996 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 9, 1995 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Study Autauga Creek, Prattville, AL Big Willis Creek, Ft. Payne, AL Bray Creek, Houston, MS Coosa River, Etowah Co., AL Dry Creek, Prattville, AL Elba Levee Major Rehab, AL Flint River, Albany, GA Greens Creek, Petal, MS Kinchafoone Creek, GA Laurel, MS Magbee Creek, Columbus, MS Matubbee Creek, Okalona, MS Minnesota Bend, Coosa River, AL Mixons Creek, Lamar County, MS Section 205 Coordination Account Gulf of Mexico, Hwy 193, Mobile Co. Gulfside Seawall, Waveland, MS River Jourdan, Texas Flat Road River Road, Pascagoula River, MS Shades Creek Bridge, Homewood, AL Third Marsh Bridge, Waveland, MS Section 14 Coordination Account Total Authority 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 10-46 Fiscal year 1999 Costs 29,285 30,774 16,982 549 17,578 148,266 60,430 36,400 1,160 1,658 35,201 29,261 549 55,355 3,756 66,187 40,065 52,658 27 39,611 3,422 8,257 $677,431 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Cost During Project Fiscal Year Shoals - Airborne Lidar Bathymetry $2,600,000 Channel Condition Surveys on Florida projects 120,314 Channel Condition Surveys on Alabama & Mississippi projects 159,533 Project Condition Surveys, General 0 Total $2,879,847 TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 1 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 72.5' 133.0' 245.4' 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, AL Camden, AL Benton, AL Carters, GA Cartersville, GA Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 - - Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13 Upper 15 Upper 15- Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 I. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 10-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL, LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 3 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews George Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth 107.6' 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 Nearest town Chattahoochee, FL Columbia, AL Ft. Gaines, GA West Point, GA Buford, GA Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - and available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1071(Summer) surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) 1070(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Height of dam (feet) 67 72 114 95 192 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 (acre-feet) Power-development 30,000 - 130,000 73,375 86,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - Cost to date:3 $56,097,9845 $13,038,427 $101,370,1454 $131,565,760 $53,777,828 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,932,884 for major rehabilitation. 5. Includes $2,480,143 for major rehabilitation. 10-48 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Armistead William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock & Dam Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam (Replacement) and Dam and Dam' Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 337.7 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Distance (miles) 3 (within city) 6 15 (within city) 6 30 Lock: Grestest length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 600 600 600 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 18.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type of construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth-Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1934 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1991 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $123,822,919 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 1. Single lift lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Scheduled. 10-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 21 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Ba Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and Lo and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway an Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 41 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tu Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 60 available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 11 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (S pool surface (msl) (W Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Sa Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay an Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/ Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 10 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Co & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (S (acre-feet) (W Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 10 Year opened to 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 19 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 14 Cost to Date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 13 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90). y Springs ick d Dam 2 pelo, MS 0 0 ummer) 414 Tinte40r9) ndstone d Shale A 3 ncrete Earth ummer) 180,000 Tinter) 143,000 0 85 7,000,000 0,398,000 10-50 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1989 THRU FY 19991 Date Federal Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Coffee County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 89 48,500 Montgomery County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jul 89 175,000 Clayton County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 89 250,000 Jefferson County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 91 397,000 Calhoun County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 91 200,000 Fayette County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 93 264,000 Tupelo, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 94 157,965 Mobile, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 94 254,531 Tuscaloosa, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 97 182,000 Dougherty Co., GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 97 244,000 Meridian, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 96 119,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Shades Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 90 45,000 Turkey Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 91 7,000 Leaf River, MS Taylorsville, MS Sep 91 25,000 Oostanaula River, GA City of Rome, GA Jan 92 10,000 Coosa River, GA City of Rome, GA Jul 92 10,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Fort Payne, AL Aug 93 41,800 Dry Creek, AL Oneonta, AL Dec 93 25,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Valley Head, AL Nov 93 34,800 Coosa River, AL Wilsonville, AL May 95 35,000 Choctawhatchee River, FL Holmes County, FL Aug 95 3,000 Thompson Creek, MS Richton, MS Aug 96 44,000 Black Creek, MS Forrest Co., MS Aug 97 35,000 Leaf River, MS McLain, MS Sep 97 19,000 Tanyard Creek, AL Jasper, AL Oct 96 32,000 Cane Creek & Tribs, AL Oakman, AL May 97 45,000 Magby Creek, MS Lowndes Co., MS Apr 96 5,700 Coosa River Wetumpka, AL Sep 98 24,000 Chickasawhay Shabuta, MS Sep 98 62,000 Walnut Creek Chilton Co., AL Nov 98 4,000 Big Dry Creek Floyd Co., GA May 99 62,000 Noxabee River Macon, MS Sep 99 67,000 Spring Creek Lafayette, GA Aug 99 7,000 Galbrith Mill Creek Montgomery, AL Sep 99 14,000 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1978 through FY 1984 reports. 10-51 NEW ORLEANS,,LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above liiie 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Ouachita- Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. The New Orleans District territory encompasses 30,000 square miles. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA .. ........................... 11-2 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ....... 11-2 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA.................. 11-3 4. Port Fourchon, LA .................. 11-4 5. Navigation work under Special authorization ....................... 11-4 Flood Control 6. Amite River and Tribs, LA, East Baton Rouge Watershed .............. 11-4 7. Comite River, LA (Diversion) .......... 11-5 8. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA ............ 11-6 9. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ................ 11-6 10. Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge Project, LA .............. . 11-7 11. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) ................ 11-8 12. New Orleans to Venice, LA (hurricane protection) ................ 11-8 13. Southeast Louisiana Urban Drainage Project............................ 11-9 14. West Bank and Vicinity, New Orleans, LA, Hurricane Protection ................ 11-9 15. Inspection of completed flood control projects ... ...................... 16. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 17. Protection of Navigation ............. 18. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ... ..................... 19. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act................ 20. General Regulatory Program .......... Tables Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement ............... Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation ..... Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. Table 11-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... Table 11-E Deauthorized Projects ....... Table 11-F Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....... Table 11-G Environmental Work Under Special Authorization ...... Table 11-H Active General Investigations ............. Page 11-10 11-10 11-11 11-11 11-11 11-12 11-14 11-16 11-22 11-25 11-26 11-27 11-28 11-29 11-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 1. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK, LA Location. The project is located within the city of New Orleans, Louisiana. It is a deep and shallow draft canal extending northward from the Mississippi River to Lake Pontchartrain. Existing project. The existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, built in 1920 by the Port of New Orleans, has dimensions of 31.5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and 640 feet long (usable length). It passes barge traffic between the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and is a vital link in the nation's Inland Waterway System. Delays to the navigation traffic average about 11 hours, with 24-36 hour delays common. The average yearly tonnage through the lock is 24 million tons, 2/3 of which is coal, petroleum products, and crude petroleum. Other major commodities include metallic ores, industrial chemicals and non-metallic minerals. Two major vehicular roadway bridges (Claiborne and St. Claude Avenues) and one railroad/roadway bridge (Florida Avenue) cross the canal in the vicinity of the existing lock. The Corps of Engineers bought the lock from the Port of New Orleans in 1985. Local cooperation. The cost sharing for the replacement lock is specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The costs of the new lock were apportioned between general cargo navigation and inland navigation. Costs assigned to inland navigation represent the NED Plan and are shared 50 percent from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund and 50 percent from regular Corps of Engineer's appropriations. Those costs assigned to general cargo navigation, which were determined not to be incrementally justified, will be the responsibility of the Port of New Orleans as they prefer a lock to accommodate deep draft traffic as well as shallow draft traffic. The NED Plan is a lock 22 feet deep by 110 feet wide by 900 feet long (usable length) and is estimated to cost $496,300,000. The Locally Preferred Plan is 36 feet deep by 110 feet wide by 1200 feet long (usable length) and is estimated to cost $585,000,000. Terminal facilities. Two container ship berths and one other ship wharf are located on the canal in the vicinity of the existing lock. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The final Evaluation Report for the Replacement Lock, including a Community Impact Mitigation Plan, was approved by HQUSACE in Feb. 1998. Detailed engineering and design for the replacement lock was initiated. Condition as of Sep 30. Initiation of construction was authorized in the FY 99 Appropriations Act. A contract for a test pile program was awarded in FY 99. Also an initial job training program will be started in FY 00 as part of the Conununity Impact Mitigation Plan. The Community Impact Mitigation Plan was specifically authorized to be a feature of this project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing IHNC lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 (57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of the existing lock to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. (See "Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA" for more details). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. A public facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two container ship berths are in operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two dredging contracts for removal of 3,500,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $2,280,000 were completed in FY 1999. Two contracts to maintain south bank stone foreshore protection at a cost of $1,628,500 and $1,048,000; one contract to maintain north bank stone foreshore dike at a cost of $515,000; and one contract to maintain north jetty at a cost of $1,192,500 were completed in FY 99. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent complete and the shiplock unit is 0 percent complete. The total project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, and consists of the Mississippi River and its major outlet to the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest Pass. Existing project. Provides more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1999) is $176,000,000 Federal and $434,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 11-2 and 11-3 of the FY 92 Annual Report. A third supplement to the LCA addressing the Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation Plan was executed on May 28, 1993. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was executed on Sep. 3, 1993 which provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from Mile 181 AHP to Baton Rouge. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is underway on the permanent mitigation plan. The permanent mitigation plan consists of the Government constructing an underwater sill, when needed, at Mile 64 AHP to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into water supplies of the metropolitan New Orleans area. The plan also provides for upgrading the Plaquemines Parish water distribution system to provide fresh water to water treatment plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. The first six contracts for the improvement of Plaquemines Parish water distribution system have been completed and one is underway. A supplemental LCA for this work was executed on May 28, 1993. The underwater sill was constructed during FY 99 due to extremely low flows in the river which allowed salt water to threaten up river water supplies. The sill was successful in preventing impacts to these facilities. One contract to maintain stone foreshore protection and headlands at a cost of $2,265,500; one contract to maintain the east and west jetties at a cost of $826,250; and one contract to maintain the pile dikes at a cost of $5,335,340 were completed in FY 99. 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 We have initiated work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features of the project. This includes the deepening of the Mississippi River to 55 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Baton Rouge. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Baton Rouge. Construction of the permanent mitigation plan is underway. Work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features is underway. 4. PORT FOURCHON, LA Location. Port Fourchon is located near the mouth of Bayou Lafourche in southern Louisiana. The port includes 3,600 acres and is located approximately three miles from the Gulf of Mexico. An authorized Federal 12 by 125-foot channel, which was completed in September 1960, is located along the same alignment as the Port Fourchon project. This channel was enlarged to 20 by 300 feet from the Gulf to the port by the Greater Lafourche Port Commission in 1968. In 1980, the Port Commission deepened the entrance channel to 30 feet and enlarged Pass Fourchon, a channel intersecting Bayou Lafourche at channel mile 2, to 20 by 300 feet. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 24 by 300 feet from the upstream end of the existing jetties to channel mile 3.4. A 26 by 300-foot channel will be constructed from the 26-foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico to the upstream end of the jetties. The channel will be dredged hydraulically. Material from the initial dredging of the interior reach and from the first maintenance will be placed in a pipeline canal, an oil well canal, and an open water impoundment area. Subsequent maintenance dredging material from this reach will be placed in the impoundment only. For both the initial dredging and future maintenance dredging from the jetty reach, material will be placed on the shoreline east and west of the jetties. All work is programmed. The estimated constructioned cost of the project is $4,930,000. (Oct 99) Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Greater Lafourche Port Commission. A Project Cooperation Agreement will be negotiated upon funding of the project. The local sponsor will enter into agreements with owners of facilities to accomplish the required relocations of utilities. The relocations can be accomplished under current State of the Louisiana permits at no cost to the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design continued and is estimated to be 80 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Planning, engineering and design activities and construction are scheduled to be completed in FY 00. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs for FY 99 were East Fork Calcasieu Pass, LA $42,897, Taylor Point Cut for $28,483; Bayou Petit Caillou, LA for $2,261. Preconstruction Engineering and design work costs for the Bayou Dularge, LA, project were $9,398 and Section 107 Coordination, $4,991. Flood Control 6. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST ROUGE PARISH WATERSHED Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, consisting of the following five watersheds in the metropolitan Baton Rouge area: Jones Creek, Ward Creek, Bayou Fountain, Beaver Bayou, and Blackwater Bayou. Existing project. The project will provide protection to residents of the metropolitan Baton Rouge area by reducing stages in the five waterways through clearing and snagging, earthen channel improvement and concrete lining of the waterways. The authorized project consists of modifying approximately sixty-six (66) total miles of channel. This involves approximately twentyfive (25) miles of minimal channel clearing and snagging, twenty-four (24) miles of earthen channel enlargement, and seventeen (17) miles of channel concrete lining. Included in the proposed construction are sixty (60) miles of stream bank aesthetic tree 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT planting. Fish and wildlife mitigation feature consist of the reforestation of 397 acres of cleared land to compensate for an estimated 280 acres of bottomland hardwoods that would be lost to project construction. Recreation features include an eleven (11) mile bicycle path. The authorized channel modifications for Beaver Bayou, Ward Creek, and Bayou Fountain are designed to have a ten percent change of being out of bank in any one year. Blackwater Bayou and Jones Creek channel modification are designed to have a four percent and two percent chance, respectively, of being out of bank in any one year. The proposed project would reduce the areal extent of the Federal Emergency Management regulatory flood plain throughout the area. The current approved cost of the project is $112,900,000, including $73,400,000 Federal cost and $39,500,000 non-Federal cost (1995 price level). Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 require that local interests shall provide cost sharing in accordance with the Chief of Engineers report dated December 23, 1996. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD's) needed for project construction. In lieu of a portion of the cash contribution, the sponsor will perform work-in-kind, including design, construction and management of the proposed channel modifications for the Bayou Fountain Watershed, and perform all necessary clearing and snagging for channel modification on Beaver Bayou, Blackwater Bayou, Weiner Creek and Dawson Creek. Cost sharing for the flood damage reduction features is in accord with the cost sharing specified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (WRDA 1986), as amended by Section 202(a) and 202(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA). Recreation cost sharing is in accordance with Section 103(a) of WRDA 86. Condition as of Sep. 30. A Design Memorandum for the Jones Creek and tributaries portion of the project is underway in FY 99. 7. COMITE RIVER (DIVERSION), LA Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, between the Comite River and the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River, north of the town of Baker, LA, and south of the town of Zachary, LA. Existing project. The project will provide protection for residents of the Comite River Basin by reducing stages in the river below the diversion point for events up to the 100-year flood event,and containing within banks events up to the 10-year flood event. The authorized project consists of construction of an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. The project also includes a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and four control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous, the fourth near McHugh Road. Disposal areas will be constructed along both banks of the new channel to retain the flood waters from the Comite River along both side of the new channel, and clearing and snagging of White, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous north of the diversion channel will also be done. Mitigation for the project includes the planting of trees on cleared land near the diversion point and on portions of the disposal area, the protection and management of existing forested lands near the diversion point. Upgrading two gauging stations and installing six new gauging stations to assist in flood prediction is also included in the project. The current approved cost of the project is $52,500,000, including $107,200,000 Federal cost and $45,300,000 non-Federal cost. The Water Resources Development Act of 1999 authorized the Secretary to include the costs of highway relocations to be cost shared as project construction features. Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government all lands, easements, rights- of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project (Current estimate is $37,763,000); and (b) Provide to the Federal Government a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of the total cost of the project, excluding cultural resources (Current estimate is $7,537,000). The total cost of items (a) and (b) mentioned above is limited to 50 percent of 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 the total cost of the project. Upon completion of the Feasibility Study, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development signed a letter of intent to sponsor the project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. In FY 99 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) efforts continued a value engineering study was completed in April 1999. Condition as of Sep. 30. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 reauthorized the project. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1999 provided $4,000,000 for construction of the project. Work on the initial set of plans and specifications is proceeding, as well as the negotiations for a Project Cooperation Agreement. 8. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune has a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm slopes from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, assumes its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $20,933,000 Federal and $12,567,000 non-Federal, including $7,157,484 contributed funds. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle were accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), was completed in early 1988. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract was physically completed Sep. 4, 1991. An O&M Manual has been approved. The project has been turned over to the State of Louisiana for operation and maintenance. The 1992 Dire Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act provided funds to repair damage to the wave berm and dune caused by Hurricane Andrew and to add offshore breakwaters to the project as an integral part of the repair. The original plan was to construct 27 breakwater segments; however, only 23 breakwater segments were constructed due to limited federal funds. 19 additional breakwater segments were built in the summer of 1999 by the local sponsor. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-4 of the FY 92 Annual Report. An additional $4,750,000 was deposited in escrow to complete restoration of the dune which was completed on Sep. 4, 1991. Condition as of Sep. 30. The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADTOD) requested PL 84-99 funds to restore the levee damaged by the different storm events since the project was last restored. LADOTD plans to restore the project upon receipt of the PL 84-99 funds. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized construction of $17 million of additional improvements to the region subject to approval of a report justifying the improvements. The District received $250,000 to initiate the study. The study is considering improvements such as raising roads, building breakwaters, and building a levee through the marshes, along the north side of the island. The Water Resources Development Act of 1999 authorized the Secretary to consider environmental benefits that the project provides to the main land coast of Louisiana. 9. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between the Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricane-generated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan provides for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson- St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1999) is $520,000,000 Federal and $214,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-5 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor, Architect-Engineer Contractors, and the local sponsors. A change from the original Barrier Plan to the current high level plan was approved in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988, and subsequently approved. The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources agreed to fund the Local Sponsor's share of mitigation and a mitigation dike was constructed in FY 97. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 86 percent complete. In FY 00, we will initiate award of 6 construction contracts, continue three ongoing construction contract, and complete seven construction contracts. In FY 01, we will initiate award of six construction contracts, and complete nine construction contracts. 10. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE PROJECT Location. The project is located on the east bank of the Mississippi River in Jefferson Parish, near New Orleans, Louisiana. Project Description. The project encompasses the design, construction, construction management, and monitoring of improvements to demonstrate a process that will reduce the impacts of stormwater discharges from Jefferson Parish on the water quality of Lake Pontchartrain. Features include: a 20,000 gpm stormwater pump station, sewer force main from the stormwater pump station to the existing Parish wastewater treatment plant, and modifications to the treatment plant. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD's) needed for project construction. The total of the local share must be a minimum of twenty-five percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent. Design and construction of modifications or additions to the Sponsor's facilities will be conducted by the facility 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 owner under technical oversight by the Corps of Engineers. Section 307(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 provides for reimbursement to the Local Sponsor for work compatible with project requirements. Condition as of Sep. 30. Physical construction of the project is complete. 11. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116.) Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1999) is $80,000,000 Federal and $34,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-6 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. One 3rd Lift contract was awarded in FY 99. Condition as of Sep. 30. In FY 99, one 3rd lift contract was completed and two more will be awarded. In FY 01, one contract will be completed. Construction commenced in February 1972 and is 88 percent complete. 12. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from St. Jude to Tropical Bend, 18 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from St. Jude to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Tropical Bend to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1999) is $173,000,000 Federal and $74,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $9,342,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $6,213,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $74,000,000, and cash contribution or equivalent work presently estimated at $58,445,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT The local sponsor has requested that an area extending from the upstream limits of Reach A at City Price to St. Jude, Louisiana be incorporated into the project. This work involves upgrading 3.3 miles of existing non-Federal levees to project standards. The local sponsor has elected to pay all of the costs of this reach of levee. While the sponsor will not receive credit for these costs, the increased protected area is eligible for Federally subsidized flood insurance. Savings to the project achieved by a portion of levee no longer being required at the upstream end of Reach A, is creditable to the local sponsor. A Post Authorization Change report was prepared for this reach and was approved by the Lower Mississippi Valley Division on Mar. 6, 1992. Supplemental assurances for the City Price to St. Jude reach were accepted on Feb. 18, 1993. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished. Requirements are described in full on page 11-7 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 99 was initiated on one 2nd enlargement contract, and completion of two others. One construction contract is scheduled for award in FY 00 and completion of another contract. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 79 percent complete. 13. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA URBAN DRAINAGE PROJECT (FLOOD CONTROL) Location. The authorized project is located in Orleans, Jefferson and St. Tammany Parishes. Features in Orleans Parish (city of New Orleans) are located on the east bank of the Mississippi River. Work in Jefferson Parish is located on the east and west banks of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, LA. St. Tanunmany Parish features are located in the southern portion of the parish, near Lake Pontchartrain, in and around the communities of Slidell, Mandeville, Madisonville, Abita Springs, and Lacomb, LA. Project Features. The work in Orleans Parish consists of enlargement of a major pumping station and work on two other stations; and improvements to about seven drainage canals and underground drainage lines. Jefferson Parish features include improvements to five pumping stations and almost thirty drainage canals. Work in St. Tammany includes: channel improvements, retention ponds, levees, and structure raising. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor(s) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRDs) needed for project construction, as well as a minimum five percent cash contribution. The total (value) of the locals share must be a minimum of twenty-five percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent of the project total. Jefferson Parish and the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans executed the Project Cost-sharing Agreements (PCAs) in January 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local interests in Jefferson and Orleans parishes continued (and in some instances, completed) some of the design and construction of features authorized in the project, for which they will get credit. Architect-Engineer contractors, working for both the Corps and the parishes, are doing most of the design work. Federal construction began in March 1997. Four Post Authorization Change reports (PAC) two in Orleans Parish, one in Jefferson Parish were initiated in FY 97. Another PAC in Jefferson Parish was initiated in FY 99. A fifth PAC in Jefferson Parish is scheduled to be initiated in FY 00. These reports are required to justify additional improvements to Orleans and Jefferson primary drainage systems. Condition as of Sep. 30. Fifteen Federal contracts were awarded through FY 99 with twenty-six scheduled for FY 00. The project is about 30% complete. 14. WEST BANK AND VICINITY, NEW ORLEANS, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. The project is located in Jefferson, Orleans and Plaquemines parishes on the West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 The project area generally extends from the Jefferson- St. Charles Parish line to the community of Oakville in Plaquemines Parish and is bounded by the Mississippi River on the north and east and Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador and the GIWW on the south and west. The originial project was from Westwego to Harvey Canal but has been expanded to include the area East of Harvey Canal and also the Lake Cataouatche area. These two areas were authorized by WRDA 96. Existing project. The total project consists of about 57 miles of new and enlarged earthen levee, 9 miles of floodwall, a navigable floodgate in the Harvey Canal below Lapalco Boulevard, a discharge channel and 1,000 cfs capacity increase at the Cousins Pump Station. The protection is designed to protect against tidal floodwaters resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The SPH has a frequency of recurrence of one in 500 years. The elevation of the SPH protection varies from 9 feet NGVD to 12 feet NGVD. The project plan includes mitigation which consists of the construction of a timber pile and tire breakwater on the west bank of Lake Cataoutache adjacent to the Salvador Wildlife Management Area and the acquisition of approximately 1,300 acres of forested wetlands which will be managed to improve habitat quality. The estimated project cost (October 1999) is $306,000,000. ($199,000,000 Federal and $107,000,000 non-Federal). Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRDs) needed for project construction. The total (value) of the sponsors share must be a minimum thirty-five percent of the total project costs, in cash or creditable work. For the Westwego area, locals must bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction. Funds provided by non- Federal interests for interim hurricane protection on the Westwego to Harvey Canal area may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the WRDA of 1986. The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and West Jefferson Levee District executed amendment number 1 of the local cooperation agreement in April 1999. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Village Hwy 45 Levee (1st Lift) contract was completed in FY 99. V-Line Levee, East of vertex, 2nd Lift contract was awarded and completed in FY 99. In addition, engineering and design is underway for the East of Harvey and for Lake Cataouatche areas. Construction contracts for the Segnette State Park Floodwall and the Hero Canal Levee are scheduled for award in FY 00. Along with three new contracts for the Westwego to Harvey Canal area. Conditions as of September 30. Project construction began in February 1991 and the total project is approximately 22% complete. The project is currently scheduled for completion in 2013. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1999. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $352,262. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1999 were $5,600,132. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $380,983. There were no emergency or rehabilitation cost for FCCE in FY 99. See Table 11-F. 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 17. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION During FY 99, operation and maintenance costs were $52,206 on Project Condition Surveys and $3,720,728 for Waterborne Commerce Statistics. 18. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM During FY 99, operation and maintenance costs were $29,967 on Local Preparedness; $112,081 on National Preparedness; $4,942 on National Emergency Facilities; and $4,371 Disaster Training and Exercise. Total costs for FY 99 were $151,361. 19. COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT (TITLE III OF PUBLIC LAW 101-646, DATED NOV. 29, 1990) Location. The coastal parishes of Louisiana. Authority. Activities were authorized by the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) (Title III of Public Law 101-646, dated Nov. 29, 1990), which established the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force. The Task Force consists of the Secretary of the Army (chairman); the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; the Governor of the State of Louisiana; the Secretary of the Interior; the Secretary of Agriculture; and the Secretary of Commerce. Local Cooperation. The conditions of local cooperation are established by this act. Condition of Sep. 30. The first Priority List (PPL) was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 31, 1991. Seventeen projects were named on the list; three of these were deauthorized due to unforeseen implementation problems. Funds in the amount of $36.6 million ($28.1 million Federal, $8.5 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. The Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 14 projects. Of the 14 remaining projects, construction has been completed on 11: West Hackberry Vegetative Plantings Demo, March 94; Bayou Labranche Wetlands Restoration, April 94; Cameron Prairie Refuge Shoreline Protection, August 94; Sabine Wildlife Refuge Erosion Protection, March 95; Vermilion River Cutoff Bank Protection, February 96; Lake Salvador Shoreline Protection at Jean Lafitte, March 96; Bayou Sauvage #1, May 96; Timbalier Vegetative Plantings Demo, July 96; Falgout Canal Vegetative Plantings Demo, December 96; and Cameron-Creole Watershed Hydrologic Restoration, January 97; and Isles Dernieres (Phase 0), October 98. Two projects are under construction: GIWW to Clovelly Wetland Restoration and Barataria Bay Waterway Marsh Creation. Additionally, one of the deauthorized projects, Dewitt/Rollover Vegetative Plantings Demo was completed in August 94. The 2nd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 19, 1992. Fifteen projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $38.3 million ($28.2 million Federal, $10.1 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 15 projects. Of the 15 projects, construction has been completed on 10: Vermilion Bay/Boston Canal, November 95; Mud Lake, June 96; Clear Marais Bank Protection, March 97; Point Au Fer, May 97; Bayou Sauvage #2, May 97; Atchafalaya Sediment Delivery, Mar 98; West Belle Pass Headland Restoration, July 98; Freshwater Bayou, Aug 98; Big Island Mining, Oct 98; and Isles Dernieres (Phase 1), October 98. Two projects, Hwy 384 and Jonathan Davis, are under construction. The 3rd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 1, 1993. Nineteen projects were named; four of these were deauthorized due to unforeseen implementation problems; with two projects in a deferred status, to be constructed if prior projects were found to be implementable. Additional funds in the amount of $38.1 million ($29.9 million Federal, $8.2 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design of several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 12 of the 13 remaining projects. Of the 13 remaining projects, construction has been completed on seven projects; Lake Salvador Shore Protection, Jun 98; Channel Armor Gap Crevasse, Nov 97; Cameron Creole Maintenance, Jul 98; Whiskey Island, Aug 98; and Cote Blanche, Dec 98; Lake Chapeau, May 99, MR-GO Back Dike, Jan 99. Four projects are under construction: Red Mud Demo, 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 East Timbalier Island Restoration #1, and Brady Canal, Sabine Refuge Structure -- Hog Island. Additionally, one of the deauthorized projects, South West Shore White Lake Demo, was completed in July 1996. The 4th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Dec. 16, 1994. Seventeen projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $33.6 million (30.0 million Federal, $3.6 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Due to the reduction in State's funding capability, only 10 projects were selected for cost-sharing; two of these were deauthorized. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 5 of the 8 remaining projects. Construction has been completed on one of the 4th PPL projects, Perry Ridge Bank Protection, Feb 99. Two projects are under construction: East Timbalier Island Restoration #2 and Plowed Terraces Demo. The 5th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Feb. 28, 1996. Nine projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $38.3 million ($33.4 million Federal, $4.9 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Due to the reduction in the State's funding capability, 3 of the projects were approved for phased construction, with the balance of their funding to come from future lists. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 2 of the 9 projects. Three projects have been completed, Racoon Island Breakwaters Demo, July 97, and Freshwater Bayou Bank Stabilization, June 98, and Little Vermilion Bay Sediment Trapping, Aug 99. One project is under construction: Sweet Lake/Willow Lake Phase 1. The 6th PPL was approved by the Task Force on April 24, 1997. Thirteen projects were named on the list; two of these were deauthorized. Additional funds in the amount of $44.8 million (39.1 million Federal, $5.7 million State) were made available for construction of these projects and to fund 5th PPL phased projects. Four of the projects were approved for phased construction, with the balance of their funding to come from future lists. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed. Three projects are under construction: Nutria Harvest for Wetland Restoration Demo, Delta-Wide Crevasses, and Oaks/Avery Canal. The 7th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Jan. 16, 1998. Twelve projects were approved on the list; only four were approved with funding. Additional Federal funds in the amount of $45.7 million were made available for construction of these projects and to continue funding two phased projects, one on PPL 5 and one on PPL 6. Engineering and design on several of the projects has begun; construction has begun on one of these projects, Thin Mat Floatant Marsh Enhancement Demo. The 8th PPL was approved on Jan. 20, 1999. Six projects were approved on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $41.9 million ($41.9 million federal, $2.6-million state) were made available for construction of these projects and PPL's 5 and 6 phased projects. Engineering and Design on several projects has begun. The 9th PPL was approved on Jan. 11, 2000. Nineteen projects were approved on the list. However, starting with PPL 9, the Task Force implement a cash flow management policy in which only the design of the projects was approved by the Task Force. After design is completed, the construction of the projects will need separate approval by the Task Force. Additionally, funds for the post-construction monitoring and O&M will be approved as needed so as not to encumber funds upfront for the full 20 year life of the project. Additional funds in the amount of $48.8 million ($47.9 million Federal; $0.9 million State) were made available for construction of the projects. 20. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Environmental Inspection Statement Total General Regulatory Program $2,833,927 1,437,585 4,708 $4,276,200 In response to Section 303(b) of the CWPPRA, the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Restoration Plan report was published in November 1993. Following public review of the final report, a Record of Decision was prepared, signed by the Task Force chairman, and submitted to HQUSACE for transmittal to the ASA(CW). The report 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT proposed $1.3 billion worth of projects that could prevent 65 percent of the coastal wetland losses over the next 20 years. The State of Louisiana expressed its intention (by letter of Jan. 5, 1993) to develop a Conservation Plan in accordance with provisions of the CWPPRA. Once approved (by the Administrator of the EPA, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Secretary of the Army), the State's share in project construction will be reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent. The State submitted the plan to the approving agencies in May 1997. Approval was received on Nov. 21, 1997. Section 532 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 amends the CWPPRA to provide for a further reduction in the State's share of CWPPRA projects. Upon approval of the Conservation Plan, the State's share of projects in 1996 and 1997 will be 10 percent. In a Sep. 3, 1996, speech in the House of Representatives, the Honorable Bud Shuster of Pennsylvania said that the intent of the legislation was to reduce the State's share of projects approved on the 5th and 6th Priority Project Lists. The amendment further provides that the Secretary of the Army must determine that a reduction in the non-Federal share is warranted. The Task Force approved a planning budget of $3,460,491 for program management and preparation of the 9th List. The Task Force is scheduled to complete the selection of the 9th Priority Project List in Jan. 2000. Recognizing that restoration of the state's coastal wetlands requires projects of a more complex nature and a larger scope that can be analyzed in the process of developing annual priority lists, the Task Force has authorized the initiation of two feasibility studies. Projects with costs of more than $40 million cannot be accommodated by the present funding stream of $35 million per year and would need authorization through a Water Resources Development Act or similar act for implementation. The Mississippi River Sediment, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution study, which is being managed by the Corps of Engineers, is intended to develop a plan for optimizing the resources of the Mississippi River, giving consideration to the river's many uses (e.g., navigation and water supply, in addition to creation and nourishment of wetlands). The study is scheduled for completion in Feb. 2000. The Louisiana Barrier Shoreline study which is being managed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, is intended to determine the feasibility of restoring the state's barrier islands and other shorelines to protect coastal wetlands and related resources. The first phase of this study was complete. In June 1997, the Task Force initiated a coast-wide grassroots planning effort termed the Coast 2050 initiative to develop a technically sound strategic plan to sustain coastal resources and provide an integrated multiple use approach to ecosystem management. The Coast 2050 plan differs from the 1993 restoration plan in that regional strategies, rather than basin strategies, will be developed and prioritized. Coast 2050 was completed in December 1998 and supports the Louisiana Coastal Area authority, Louisiana Ecosystem Restoration reconnaissance report, which was approved by HQUSACE in May 1999. Nine basin feasibility studies are planned for execution under the 1967 Louisiana Coastal Area authority. The Energy and Water Development Act of FY 2000 allocated approximately $1.5 million to initiate the Barataria Basin feasibility study schedule for completion in June 2002. Follow on basin feasibility studies will be initiated about every 18 months to 3 years thereafter. The total estimated cost of the nine feasibility studies is $30 million, which is to be cost shared on a 50-50 percent basis with the State of Louisiana. 11-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 1. Inner Harbor New Work Navigation Canal Lock 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) 4. Port Fourchon, LA 6. Comite River, LA (Diversion) 7. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA 8. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3,534,000 3,534,000 3,107,909 3,107,909 1,861,000 1,370,000 2,323,000 200,000 107,450,200 1,927,198 1,371,613 1,922,193 446,971 107,186,981 17,005,000 21,173,000 16,028,000 40,417,000 276,388,476 17,004,481 20,342,160 15,570,763 41,742,157 148,482,167 -1,840,000 1,485,000 2,185,000 630,000 24,480,000 1,267,380 1,424,837 2,245,266 519,422 24,119,250 0 -21,900 4,750,000 0 -7,000 4,750,000 225,000 56,835 105,000 24,000 83,210 126,337 373,000 285,000 0 20,256 -104,000 2,569 159,000 296,000 367,000 930,000 7,147,000 341,114 279,840 313,000 780,000 6,997,000 102,000 247,000 247,888 186,072 10,000 8,617 13,348,000 17,025,000 22,920,000 16,000,000 17,094,000 18,367,390 12,695,193 24,443,102 3,522,000 2,073,018 3,038,000 1,056,430 10,000 56,059 19,067,500 79,747 43,249 19,054,688 10,000 8,616 369,422,000 382,769,102 -- 1,000,000 17,085,000 1,292,290 0 12,288,000 550,000 2,650,000 9,000,000 4,500,000 320,000 3,286,913 10,462,748 4,184,658 19,096,000 18,699,319 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 10. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,101,000 489,000 938,000 1,088,000 71,819,000 1,167,000 398,829 827,614 1,071,952 71,593,396 910,000 273,000 987,000 -10,513 330,054 0 4,528,000 0 4,528,000 11. New Orleans to New Work (Fed) Venice, LA Approp. (Hurricane Protection) Cost (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Southeast Louisiana, Louisiana 13. Westbank and Vicinity, New Orleans, LA (Hurricane Protection) 13. Westbank East of Harvey Canal, LA 13. East of Harvey Canal 18. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost 2,616,000 3,926,000 1,469,000 697,000 143,078,000 2,681,149 3,910,154 1,498,276 701,055 143,069,289 600,000 2,920,000 1,508,200 600,000 19,602,397 804,026 1,632,249 1,813,000 1,754,507 19,601,268 2,000,000 14,070,000 36,910,000 75,000,000 127,980,000 1,693,390 7,613,261 41,841,635 53,229,795 104,378,081 - - 6,618,000 804,026 1,632,249 0 6,618,000 0 -- - - 5,809,000 5,809,000 5,231,688 5,231,688 3,618,000 6,999,000 4,123,000 0 34,856,000 7,438,028 6,534,898 4,143,471 575,294 34,799,671 - 1,419,000 320,000 - 836,297 813,707 0 1,739,000 85,818 1,735,822 38,371,625 44,134,000 47,540,715 46,864,079 313,065,062 13,562,343 13,562,343 16,022,782 46,204,300 117,499,999 4,936,370 5,701,366 3,186,896 2,593,248 46,750,399 1,112,400 7,894,100 1,676,564 935,300 13,482,890 11-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. Amends above Act of 1986 to include a Community Impact Mitigation Plan as an authorized feature of the project to replace the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 Public Law 104-303 Oct. 12, 1996 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. PORT FOURCHON, LA Provides a Federal navigation channel with a project depth of 24 feet MLLW in Bayou Lafourche, Belle Pass, and the Gulf of Mexico to improve navigation access to Port Fourchon at a total cost of $4,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress (See Section 101) Oct. 12, 1996 H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 11-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1999 August 17, 1999 Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed. The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the Chief of Engineers Dated December 23, 1996, a total cost of $112,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal of $39,500,000. COMITE RIVER, LA (Diversion) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Construct an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. Also included is a stage control structure in the Comite River at the diversion point, a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and three control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous. Public Law 106-53 August 17, 1999 Public Law 102-580 Section 101 (11) Oct. 31, 1992 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, FY 1999 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 107, Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, as amended Provided funding authority in the amount of $930,000 to initiate construction. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 7 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 8 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of twb independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. NORTH PASS - PASS MANCHAC, LA The Corps of Engineers may construct small river and harbor improvement projects not specifically authorized by Congress when they will result in substantial benefits to navigation. Public Law 104-305 Section 301(b)(5) Oct. 12, 1996 Public Law 105-245 Oct. 7, 1998 H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645 Jul. 14, 1960 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE, LA (See Section 9 of Text) Provides for design and construction of project to to address water quality problems associated with stormwater discharges. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 10 of Text) A loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. The Franklin Area reparable element is currently under review for deauthorization in accordance with WRDA 1990. MERMENATU RIVER - GRAND CHENIER, LA (See Sec. 11 of Text) Construction of emergency bank-protection works to prevent flood damage to highways, bridge approaches and public works. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 12 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 102-580 H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong, 2d sess. Jul. 24, 1946 H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, FY 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1999 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, LA (See Section 13 of text) Provides for drainage canal and pump station improvements in Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, and drainage improvements, flood protection and structure raising in St. Tammany Parish. Public Law 104-46 (Sec 108) Public Law 104-303 (Sec 533) WEST BANK AND VICINITY, OF NEW ORLEANS, LA HURRICANE PROTECTION Combination of Projects - Section 328(b) of WRDA 99 states: The Secretary shall carry out work authorized as part of the Westwego to Harvey Canal project, the East of Harvey Canal project, and the Lake Cataouatche modifications as a single project, to be known as the "West Bank and Vicinity, New Orleans, Louisiana, Hurricane Protection", with a combined total cost of $280,300,000. Westwego to Harvey Canal - Section 401(b) of WRDA 86 states: Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and as estimated first non-Federal Cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. East of Harvey Canal - Section 101(a)(17) of WRDA96 states: The project for hurricane damage reduction, West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans (East of Harvey Canal), Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of $126,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 82,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $43,800,000. Lake Cataouatche - Section 101(b)(11) of WRDA 96 states: The project for hurricane damage prevention and flood control, West Bank Hurricane Protection (Lake Cataouatche Area), Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, at a total cost of $14,375,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $9,344,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,031,000. Public Law 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 Public Law 99-662, Nov 17, 1986 Public Law 104-303 Public Law 104-303 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT (See Section 19 of Text) Coastal Wetlands Directed the Secretary of the Army to convene the Louisiana Public Law 101-64 Planning, Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force Nov. 24, 1990 Protection and to initiate a process to identify and prepare a list of coastal Section 301-306 Restoration Act wetlands restoration projects in Louisiana to provide for the the long-term conservation of such wetlands and dependent fish and wildlife populations in order of priority in creating, restoring, protecting, and enhancing coastal wetlands, taking into account the quality of such coastal wetlands, with due allowance for small-scale projects necessary to demonstrate the use of new techniques or materials for coastal wetlands restoration. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge1 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA2'3'4'5 Bayou Dupre, LA Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA3 '7 Bayou Vermilion, LA3 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA8 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA9 Cane River, LA2 '5 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA1o Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA1"1 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA12 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA 13 Leland Bowman Lock, LA Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete CoCmompplleettee Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete _-- Complete Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 1950 1987 1973 1977 28,234 17,098,851 69,087 30,356,691 143,825,966 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 27,830,835 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 37,167,654 31,199,728 320,758 104,187 119,191 2,218,245 223,616 36,780 28,315 725,556 10,400,112 2,716,347 251,691 200,169 37,169 183,800,227 2,000 463,401 452,611 35,250,151 14,48010 63,284,470 553,877,540 -- 36,601,297 249,052 _-- 32,200,010 77,761 5,197,97514 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 11-22 1928 1914 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 1938 May 1956 1915 Mar. 1923 Mar. 1957 1916 1896 2 Oct. 1968 Apr. 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 -- 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 Mar. 1985 1929 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mermentau River, LA Complete 1985 4,672,579 40,768,158 Jul. 1952 Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA -- 1991 84,568,12816 1,071,615,88617 -- Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, --21 1996 88,535,00020 276,188,920 Jan. 196821 Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 1,271,252 Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,014,012 33,737,176 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA) 15 -- 1957 -- 139,755 -- North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1996 533,492 -- May 1995 Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 124,681 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,453,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 45,527,847 Sulphur River, AR and TX2,5 -- 1919 45,989 -- -- Tangipahoa River, LA -- 1985 -- 2,460,039 -- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA3 Complete 1973 8,115 94,164 1921 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA" -- 1948 10,904 742 -- Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,669,066 Jun. 1950 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA Complete 1990 641,608 1,889,032 Aug. 1964 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. Includes previous project costs. No commerce reported. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. Work is under continuing authority. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 11-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) 17. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 18. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 19. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 20. Includes $8,811,000 Non-Federal Costs. 21. Channel completed except for IHNC Lock replacement and foreshore protection. 11-24 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Amite River and Tributaries, LA 1964 3,034,255' -- Feb. 1964 Bayou Choupique, LA2 1954 129,930 -- Mar. 1954 Bayou Rapides, LA2 1952 95,179 - Dec. 1951 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA 1979 1,018,005 -- -- Morgan City and Vicinity, LA 1992 1,975,628 -- -- 1. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ................... $ 430 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ........ 425,209 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) 11-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Baton Rouge Harbor 1946 Nov. 2, 1979 -- Segment Between Section 12, Mi 2.5 and 5.0 Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74) Bayou Grosse Tete, 1969 May 6, 1981 -- LA DAEN-CWP-A Letter Subj: Completed Action on 5th Deauthorization Rpt, dated Jun. 17, 1981 Lake Borgne and 1942 Nov 1979 -- Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties Vinton Waterway, LA 1950 Nov. 2, 1979 Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA of 1974) 11-26 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, P.L. 858 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Bayou Tete L'Ours, LA 18,537 18,537 Braithwhite Park, LA 62,504 62,504 Crown Point Basin, LA 38,118 38,118 Donaldsonville Canal, LA 46,319 46,319 Goose Bayou Basin, LA 76,047 76,047 Jean Lafitte, LA (Fisher School Basin) 166,623 27,355 193,978 Little Bayou Castine, LA 1,227 1,227 Lockport to La Rose, LA 6,311 6,311 Lower Lafitte Basin, LA 35,747 35,747 Pailet Basin, LA 68,564 68,564 Rosethorne Basin in Lafitte, LA 37,559 17,816 55,375 Section 205 Coordination 19,102 19,102 Oakville, La Reussite, LA 74,269 74,269 Henderson Bayou Ascension Parish, LA 48,236 48,236 Stephensville, St. Martin Parish, LA 34323 34,323 Total Section 205 733,486 45,171 778,657 Emergency StreamBank & Shoreline Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) (Section 27 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total St. Joseph Church, Pierre Port, LA -2,590 -2,590 Bayou Des Glaises 14 14 Fagan Drive Bridge, Arnolds Creek, LA 2,934 2,934 Scotlandville Bluff, LA 135,540 135,540 Section 14 Coordination 12,632 12,632 Stage Highway 1185, Site 1 125,983 57,721 183,704 State Highway 3066 Below Indian Village 4,209 4,209 Parish Rd 218, Merm R. Gd. Chenier 67 67 Highway 1185, Site #2, Avoyelles Parish 22,553 22,553 Highway 77, Bayou Plaquemine, LA 3,726 3.726 Total Section 14 307,658 55,131 362,789 Clearing and Snagging For Flood Control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control, as amended) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Bayou Manchac, Ascension Parish, LA 28,630 28.630 Total Section 208 23,630 28,630 11-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-G ENVIRONMENTAL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Wetland/Other Aquatic Habitat Creation (Section 204, Public Law 102-560) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Barataria Bay Waterway, MI 31 to 24.5, LA 43,500 34,500 78,000 Brown Lake, Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, LA 748,465 283,109 1,031,574 COSMAD, Sediment Trap for Marsh Creation, LA 56,376 56,376 Grande Terre Back Bay, LA 75,000 25,000 100,000 Mississippi River - Gulf-Outlet, Breton Island 787,500 262,500 1,050,000 Mississippi River - Gulf-Outlet, MI -2 to 3 Berm, LA 113,402 37,801 151,203 Mississippi River - Gulf Outlet, MI 14 to 11 194,914 84,086 279,000 Sabine National Wildlife Refuge, LA 1999 509,801 192.600 702.401 Total Section 204 2,528,958 919,596 3,448,554 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206, Public Law 104-303) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Coordination Account Funds 8,038 8,038 Preliminary Restoration Plans 31.972 31,973 Total Section 206 40,010 40,011 Project modifications to improve environment (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Coordination Account Funds 7,871 7,871 Initial Appraisals 23,797 23,797 Gulf Intercoastal Waterway, Plaquemines Lock, LA 59,724 59,724 South Pass, Miss. River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico 245 2.442 2.687 Total Section 1135 91,637 2,442 94,079 11-28 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96 x 3121) Item and CWIS Number FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Intracoastal Waterway Locks, LA-81289 Calcasieu River, Hackberry, LA-010452 Morganza to Gulf of Mexico-012875 Mississippi River Ship Channel Improvements, LA-10454 East Fork, Calcasieu Pass, LA-013561 Calcasieu Lock, LA-014314 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Amite River & Tributaries, LA-050100 Amite River-Darlington Res. LA-010455 Bayou Blanc, Crowley, LA-13325 Bayou Tigre, Erath, LA-13291 Black Bayou, Diversion, LA-13236 Jefferson Parish, LA-13236 Lafayette Parish, LA-13251 Orleans Parish, LA-13237 West Shore, Lake Pontchartrain-10455 St. Tammany Parish, LA-013155 Subtotal Special Studies(140) Environmental Services Partnerships-14190 Sabine Diversion Canal, LA-10493 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities(170) Gulf of Mexico Program-17251 Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 National Estuary Program-53903 North American Waterfowl Management-53904 Special Investigations-17250 Subtotal Planning Assistance to States(186) Ascension Parish Hydrologic & Hydraulic Modeling-022040 Calcasieu Parish Data Management-(022043) St. Charles West Bank Recreation-22048 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Emergency Response Phase 2-071505 Chitimacha River Corridor Master-71506 Chitmacha Indian Tribe River Corridor-071503 Comprehensive Performance Evaluations-022036 E. Baton Rouge Parish Data Management-022032 E. Baton Rouge Parish GIS Mapping-022028 Evangeline Parish Environment-022042 State Penitentary H&H-22052 Chitimacha Tribe H&H-071501 Orleans Parish Data Management-022037 DOT State Water Plan-022044 Ascension Wr Data Management-022045 595,454 652 900 93,046 56308 595,454 652 993,260 993,260 900 93,046 56308 746,3660 1,739,620 227 1,022 1,022 819 819 16 16 -1,200 -1,200 184,367 75,234 259,601 714,184 35,273 749,457 316,299 7,328 323,627 310,635 15,947 326,582 47 47 1,525,394 134,804 1,658,949 940 940 230 230184 1,170 1,170 129,670 129,670 41,111 41,111 6,599 6,599 1,054 1,054 44.904 44.904 223,338 223,338 1325240 1,280 0 83,689 146,172 8,738 34,111 1,155 23,514 833 13,715 72 30,000 60,000 -35,906 1,395 22,006 25,302 150,000 0 69,684 479 0 18,951 5,104 0 11,530 43,230 96,334 2,675 22,006 108,991 296,172 8,738 103,795 1,634 23,514 833 18,951 18,819 41,530 41,530 103,230 11-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 11-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96 x 3121) Item and CWIS Number FedeFraIl SCANLon Y-FEeAdeRr aCl OST Total Federal Non-Federal Total St. Tammany Wr Data Management-022046 St. James Water Resources Data M-022047 St. Charles East Bank Recreation-022049 Amite Basin Flood Hazard Mitigation-022050 EBR Value Engineering-02051 St. Charles Parish Water Resources Data Management-022035 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management-82030 Quick Responses-82045 Technical Services-82040 Special Studies, Kinder, LA-083013 Special Studies, Tunica-Biloxi, LA-083167 Special Studies- Town of Livingston-083171 Special Studies-Armaudville-3177 Floodproofing Workshop-081358 Special Studies-Digitized Records-83186 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) PROJECTS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 400) Navigation Projects (421) BYU Lafourche and Lafourche JMP, Waterway, LA-010009 Subtotal Flood Control Projects (450) East Baton Rouge Parish, LA-012909 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 400) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) BYU Lafourch and Lafourch JMP Waterway, LA-010009 Comite River, LA-077059 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 600) 60,000 59,109 95 34,886 55,445 96 120 63,740 12,712 30,908 51,866 Q 9949 60,120 122,849 12,807 65,794 107,311 105045 745,150 481,070 1,226,220 $ 3,241,412 1,609.134 4.849.297 24,730 24,730 5,722 5,722 146,968 146,968 370 370 50,000 50,000 40,663 40,663 27,720 27,720 27,269 27,269 65.108 65.108 388,550 388,550 $ 266,268 266.268 $ 60.765 60.765 60,765 60,765 394.883 394.883 394,883 394,883 $ 455.648 455.648 65,572 65,572 $ 46.682 46.682 112,254 112,254 $ 112.254 112.254 11-30 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $4,197,864 1,609,134 5,805,749 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. The Vicksburg District territory encompasses 68,000 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ...................... 12-2 2. Red River emergency bank protection .... 12-2 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA .............. 12-3 4. Navigation work under special authorization.................... 12-3 Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA ................. 6. McKinney Bayou, AR ................ 7. Ouachita River Levees, LA ............ 8. Ouachita River and tributaries ARandLA ....................... 9. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ......... 10. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA .............. .......... 11. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) .................. 12. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) ........... ........... 13. West Agurs, LA, Levee ............... 14. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 15. Flood control work under special authorization.................... 12-3 12-4 12-4 12-5 12-5 12-6 12-7 12-7 12-7 12-8 12-8 16. Ecosystem Restoration Work Under Special Authorization ................ 12-8 17. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ............... ........... 12-9 18. General Regulatory Program ........... 12-9 Tables Table 12-A Cost and Financial Statement.. Table 12-B Authorizing Legislation ...... Table 12-C Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ........... Table 12-D Other Authorized Navigation Project ................. Table 12-E Ouachita River and Tributaries-Existing Project ... Table 12-F Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects .............. Table 12-G Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects ....... Table 12-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Table 12-I Deauthorized Projects ....... Table 12-J Active General Investigations............. 12-10 12-12 12-16 12-17 12-19 12-20 12-21 12-22 12-24 12-25 12-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a two-barge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $281,009,000 which includes $263,000,000 Federal costs and $18,009,000 non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to furnish the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA, and a petroleum-loading facility is in the vicinity of Smackover, AR. Operations and results during fiscal year. In FY 99, maintenance dredging was performed from Camden, AR, to the mouth of the Black River by the contract Dredge Kelly L. and Dredge Butcher. 732,293 cubic yards of material were moved from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design and construction of the remaining features is on hold pending a consensus between the states of Arkansas and Louisiana concerning the type of development desired or the additional studies needed to reach a decision. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1997) is $112,862,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed on Hurricane and Cat Island Revetments in ARK and LA, respectively. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 99 percent complete. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYPROJECT Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Reach Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provides a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development includes five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,896,133,000 Federal and $88,833,000 non-Federal. The Federal cost includes $442,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Red River Waterway Commission for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area was executed on Jun. 16, 1993, and a project cooperation agreement between the same agencies for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Bayou Bodcau was executed on July 17, 1996. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Construction of the Caddo-Bossier and Natchitoches Parish ports by local interests is underway. Operations and results during fiscal year. The following contracts were completed in FY 99: Eagle Bend Capout, PH. I; Socot Capout PH III; and Campti Capout and Hadden-Ft. Derussy Repairs. Engineering and design for additional channel work was continued. Ile Au Vaches Dikes and Ben Routh reinforcement work was initiated. In addition, acquisition of mitigation lands in the Bayou Bodcau area was initiated. Maintenance dredging was performed along the waterway by the Contract Dredge Butcher, during Fiscal Year 1999. 2,493,456 cubic yards of material were removed from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 88 percent complete. Feasibility phase studies were authorized by WRDA 96 to determine the feasibility of extending navigation on the Red River from the vicinity of Shreveport, LA, to the vicinity of Index, AR, or to any justifiable interim point were initiated in Mar 99. Feasibility studies are scheduled for completion in Sep 02. The Arkansas Red River Commission is the non-Federal sponsor. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. In FY 98, $5,011 was expended on Section 107 Coordination Account; $59,552 on Yazoo Diversion Canal, MS; $32,753 on Columbia Port, Ouachita Parish, LA; $40,622 on Yellow Bend Port, AR; $34,106 on Ouachita River, Smackover, AR. Flood Control 5. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA Location. The project is located in north-central Louisiana between the towns of Winnfield and Pineville on the left descending bank of the Red River. 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Authorized Project. The recommended plan consists of a three-barrel floodgate structure installed at the mouth of Bayou Darrow to reopen it to the Red River, 8.2 miles of clearing and snagging on Bayou Darrow from its mouth upstream to Bayou Rigolette, construction of a closure and low-flow structure on Bayou Rigolette just below its junction with Bayou Darrow, and realignment of Sam's Bayou and appropriate mitigation features. Local Cooperation. The City of Colfax, LA, has agreed to cost share this project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on Sept. 19, 1994. Operations And Results During Fiscal Year. Construction is underway on the Bayou Darrow Structure and Low Flow Structure Item 2. Right-of-way acquisition for Item 3 is underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction underway on Items 1 and 2. Construction of Item 4 is complete. 6. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR Location. The project area is located in southwestern Arkansas in the vicinity of Texarkana, AR and TX. The McKinney Bayou area is a crescent-shaped watershed located adjacent to the Red River containing approximately 340 square miles. Existing project. The authorized project consists of flow diversion to the Red River at the state line between Arkansas and Texas, flow diversion into the Red River at Buzzard Bluff, improvement of McKinney Bayou channel, and land acquisition for mitigation. The State Line Diversion, Buzzard Bluff Diversion, and channel improvement features have subsequently been reclassified to the inactive category due to a lack of local support or lack of economic justification. Alternative plans developed to reduce flooding consisted of various channel improvements on the lower 27.6 miles of McKinney Bayou. A clearing and snagging alternative with project first costs of $3.2 million and a plan combining clearing and snagging with channel improvement with project first costs of $4.9 million were found economically feasible. Shortly after initiation of reconnaissance studies, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in an effort to streamline the study process, approved proceeding directly from the reconnaissance phase to preconstruction engineering and design (PED), subject to reconnaissance study finding being substantially in accordance with the authorized McKinney Bayou project and with previous U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans Disrict, study findings. Under this arrangement, the cost-shared feasibility phase would be eliminated. Study findings substantiated this decision. As a result, it was recommended that the study effort progress into PED. The reconnaissance report was approved by the U.S. Army Corps, Mississippi Valley Division, on May 12, 1997. The plan recommended for implementation would be developed during PED. The local cost-sharing sponsors, the Miller County Improvement and Drainage District and the McKinney Bayou Drainage District have indicated by letters dated Sep. 24, and Sep. 30, 1997, respectively, that they do not have the financial resources to undertake project construction. Therefore, they do not wish to continue into the next project development phase, PED. The project is being held in abeyance pending further developments regarding the local sponsor's ability to cost-share. If this cost-sharing issue cannot be resolved, all activities associated with the project will be terminated and it will be classified as inactive. Condition as of Sep. 30. A new start reconnaissance study was initiated in January 1996. This restudy of the authorized project to address the feasibility of channel improvements on McKinney Bayou to reduce flooding of agricultural and other properties was completed in March 1997. Project is approved to proceed directly into preconstruction engineering and design pending execution of a PED cost sharing agreement. 7. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A Summary Report authorized gravel surfacing 117.4 miles of levee, and enlarging 36.6 miles of levee. Estimated Federal cost is $29,500,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,404,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed in FY 90. The 1991 Water and Energy Appropriations Act gave the Federal government responsibility for the repair and/or replacement of the deteriorated drainage structures. The Assurances Agreement for Local Cooperation was supplemented to reflect this change in 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT responsibility. The supplemental agreement covered work performed in Fiscal Years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system was necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville levee enlargement is complete. All deteriorated culverts have been replaced and/or rehabilitated. Item 1 of the Bastrop to Monroe Levee enlargement was advertised and awarded in FY 99. Construction of the levee enlargement is underway and is scheduled to be completed in late FY 00. 8. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. Reconnaissance studies of flooding problems in Ouachita Parish, LA, were initiated in January 1994. Study efforts are concentrating on the developing urban area around Monroe, LA. The reconnaissance report, completed in January 1995, recommended a feasibility study be conducted on flood reduction for the River Styx Bayou area under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The study addressed alternative sized pumping stations. The final Detailed Project Report was completed in November 1995. Plans and specifications for the project are complete. The construction contract was awarded on Sep 30 98. This contract is scheduled for completion in FY 00. 9. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the South-central portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.2 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 18.9 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street 1-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 12-6 of the FY 92 report. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies have been terminated due to the lack of a local sponsor. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area have been completed and a potentially feasible levee plan identified. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed with the Local Sponsor on Sep. 25, 1991. The feasibility studies focused on a comprehensive levee system and other flood control measures across the basin to reduce damages associated with flooding from the Pearl River. The Feasibility Study was terminated in July 1998 due to the lack of a cost sharing sponsor. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. None were found economically feasible. We are currently coordinating with the NRCS to identify other feasible projects in the basin. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. The final EIS was filed with EPA in March 1994. Studies indicate that the West Pearl River Navigation Project is economically justified, engineeringly feasible, and in the overall public interest. Maintenance dredging was to resume in the spring of 1995; however, the Corps was enjoined from dredging until a trial could be held in Federal court. At present, litigation has been stated and the court has retained jurisdiction until the Corps is prepared to initiate dredging and notified the court. This notification could take place when the record of decision is signed and the Corps is ready in all other aspects to initiate dredging. The NEPA process is not complete; therefore, dredging of the West Pearl River will not occur in 2000. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows to support a 7-to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. Investigations of low flow conditions in the Walkiah Bluff area were initiated in FY 95 under authority of Section 307(d) of WRDA 90. A detailed project report was completed in May 1997 which recommended a 50-50 low-flow distrubution (50 percent down Wilson Slough and 50 percent down the Pearl River). Construction of this project was completed in Dec 99. Reconnaissance studies of flood damage prevention and erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, have been completed. These studies indicated that flood damages attributable to headwater flooding from Caney Creek are relatively insignificant and will not economically justify a water resource improvement plan under current conditions. Studies also found that most of the more serious streambank erosion problems along the creek have been corrected through actions undertaken by other public entities and agencies. 10. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of 1-10 will consist of 4.0 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area north of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT on the Pearl River. The segment south of 1-10 will consist of 9.0 miles of levees, three pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area south of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 13 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Estimated Federal cost is $28,437,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $9,479,000. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee Board, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30, 1986. The 1997 Louisiana Regular Legislative Session abolished the St. Tammany Levee District. Operations and results during fiscal year. This project has been terminated due to the abolishment of the project sponsor. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed resolution of comments on the General Design Memorandum for north levee only. Preparation of plans and specifications has been terminated. No construction has taken place. 11. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-F for new projects and Table 12-G for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 12. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1998) is $83,609,000 Federal and $5,391,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levee and bank stabilization are complete with the exception of levee rehabilitation within the state of Arkansas. Construction was completed on the rehabiliation of levee Item 2 in Arkansas, and initiation on Item 3. Construction of the Twelve-Mile Bayou Revetment Capout was initiated. 13. WEST AGURS, LA, LEVEE Location. The West Agurs, LA, Levee is located in Caddo Parish in northwestern Louisiana, immediately adjacent to the northern corporate limits of Shreveport. 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Existing Project. The West Agurs levee was constructed by local interests in 1961 and incorporated into the Federal project Red River Below Denison Dam Project in 1983. The levee extends from U.S. Highway 71 at the north end of the area to the Texas and Pacific Railroad at the lower end, a distance of approximately 3 miles. In addition to the levee, appurtenant interior drainage works include a borrow pit channel at an approximate bottom elevation of 150.0 feet NGVD, a 55 CFS pumping station, and one 10- by 10-foot floodgate. The entire system was designed to protect the 700-acre West Agur area from Twelve Mile Bayou headwater and Red River backwater flooding. Total Federal cost is $0. Local Cooperation. The Caddo Levee District completed levee improvements consisting of a temporary ponding area required for the levees to be incorporated into the Federal project in 1983. The West Agur levee was incorporated into the Federal system in 1983. Operation and maintenance of the levee is the responsibility of the Caddo Levee District. Condition as of Sep 30. Studies of flooding problems in the West Agur area conducted under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended were completed in March 99. The report completed in December 1998 recommends an additional 55 cfs pump to provide flood protection to commercial and industrial properties located within the leveed area. Plans and specifications for the pumping station are currently being prepared. Project construction is scheduled for FY 01. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $278,471 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1999, is $5,178,441. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) FY 99 costs for the period were $430,707 for disaster preparedness. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) Total FY costs for emergency bank protection work was $145,290. This included work on Big Black River, U.S. Highway 51 Bridge, $-1,536, Clear Creek, Warren County, MS, $72,056; Cane Creek, MS, $28,925; Bayou Pierre, $14,040; Little Black Creek, $14,313; $1,576 non-Federal on Highway 51 Bridge, $37,442 on Clear Creek Bridge, MS, and Coordination Account Funds $17,532. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Ouachita Parish River Styx, LA, $1,333,233, Twelve Mile Bayou $68,248 Camden, AR $24,681; Red Chute Bayou, LA, $52,528; Kings Point, MS, $19,480 Coordination Account Funds $18,566; $410,184 non-Federal on Ouachita Parish Police. 16. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During the FY, $10,180 was expended on initial appraisals; $8,126 on Coordination Account Funds; $22,493 on Lake Whittington Weir, MS, $9,738 on Catahoula, Lake, LA; $54,793 on Lake George, MS; $61,793 on Little Tallahatchie River above Sardis Lake, MS; $259,587 on Sulphur River, AR; and $144,035 on Frasier Whitehorse Oxbow, LA; Lake Lee, MS & AR, 5,972; Bayoy Macon, $942. Total costs for Section 1135 was $577,660. Project modifications for improvement of environmental pursuant to Section 307(d), Public Law 102-580. During the FY, $1,561,607-Federal was expended on Pearl River, Walkiah Bluff, MS and LA and $680,951 non-Federal. 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Aquatic Restoration pursuant to Section 206, P.L. 104-303. During FY 99, $7,958 was expended on Coordination Account Funds and $9,832 on Preliminary Restoration Plans. 17. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM During FY 99, $9,692 was expended on Local Preparation; $95,648 on National Preparedness, and $1,711 on National Emergency Facilities; and $2,348 on Reddiness Training. Total costs for FY 99 was $109,399. 18. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGRAM During FY 99, $1,667,844 was expended on Permit Evaluation, and $569,733 on Enforcement. A total of $2,237,578 was expended in FY 98. 12-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 99 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Aloha- Rigolette, LA 6. Contrib. Funds (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp.$ Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -- $ 5,248,619' -- 5,248,6191 30,000 453,099 111,076 -- 150,000 230,759,2512 -- 3,573 230,113,8072 6,795,000 8,698,000 6,919,000 7,403,000 146,740,103 6,834,260 8,646,907 6,646,737 7,683,567 146,503,968 6,600,000 6,000,000 7,831,332 8,451,252 2,222,056 493,000 65,501,000 677,778 64,840,918 6,825 6,825 18,990,200 8,904,000 15,487,000 10,739,000 1,317,070,200 19,445,126 4,921,367 11,354,810 17,188,358 1,315,113,186 7,222,000 9,167,000 12,033,000 9,309,400 89,915,191 7,265,615 9,051,268 12,049,231 9,374,662 88,831,405 -- -150,893 4,916,659 587,352 -- 0 4,879,967 271,800 1,814,000 1,418,000 744,000 6,496,800 319,174 1,518,306 1,195,331 1,108,937 6,338,341 -- 138,000 -- 156,900 538,000 584,177 32,553 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 99 7. Ouachita River Levees, LA 9. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS Pearl River Walkiah Bluff (Contrib. Funds) 10. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA 11. Red River below Denison Dam Levees and Bank Stabilization (Vicksburg District) Natchez Bluff (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,300,000 2,790,774 95,000 2,563,294 1,306,715 0 24,463,758 462,763 22,728,497 2,080,000 2,079,999 -- -- 2,000,000 1,560,000 5,560,000 572,763 293,276 1,906,884 1,561,608 4,510,858 388,000 156,000 141,000 124,400 2,760,900 392,018 152,834 136,000 128,840 2,667,808 -- 977,500 2,270,054 -- 680,951 1,383,936 -20,000 1,089 2,000,000 756,231 -- 939,000 681,346 1,362,608 3,586,000 3,682,404 0 76,400,000 1,466,232 75,262,702 -- 4,500,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 12,500,000 -- 631,071 766,414 5,404,158 6,801,643 -- 741,000 1,341,000 -- 985,665 1,085,415 12-11 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 CANAL 43, AR Channel enlargement CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D' Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text). Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA (See Section 5 of Text) Original author incorporated into RRBW Protection FCA 1946 project modified to provide Bayou Darrow outlet. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1988. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 12-12 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101- 101 Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948 Nov. 17,1986 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Jun. 30, 1948 as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 29, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 NATCHEZ BLUFFS, MS Authorizes bluff stabilization in accordance with the Natchez Bluff study at a total cost of $17,200,000, estimated federal cost of $12,900,000 and non federal cost of $4,300,000. CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA Construction of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. LEAD BAYOU, MS Channel enlargement. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX (See Section 6 of text) Authorizes a comprehensive study and recommendations for development and efficient utilization of water and related resources for the McKinney Bayou area, a tributary of Red Water. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 8 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. Public Law 104-303 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Feb. 6, 1990. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. Public Law 98-63 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 12-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Water Resources Development Act of 1996 PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 10 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chief's report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PORTER BAYOU, MS Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Section 11 of Text) Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. Water Resources Development Act of 1990 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire an additional 12,000 acres adjacent to or close to the Bayou Bodcau Wildlife Management Area. WRDA 96 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire lands adjacent to Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area in Caddo and Red River Parishes and increasing the authorized cost to $10,500,000. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong., 2d sess. Section 301, Public Law 104-303 12-14 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources WRDA 96 modified the project to include dredging of the entrance Section 301, Public Development to the Oxbow Lakes designated for preservation in project Law 104-303 Act of 1996 documentation and stated that the cost sharing for this dredging should be the same as the general navigation features. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 12 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Levee and bank stabilization. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on H. Doc. 304, Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the 90th Cong., 2d sess. Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River H. Doc. 304, from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-15 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Con- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA S Columbia, LA Felsenthal, AR Calion, AR (H. K. Thatcher) 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do Moving Tainter gated dam; bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates do Tainter gated dam; fixedcrest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates do Tainter gated dam; hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. do Tainter gated dam; hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. 1002 $ 43,585,000 952 46,235,000 882 102,161,000 882 71,019,000 $263,000,000 18,009,000 281,009,000 Estimated Federal Cost Estimated Non-Federal Cost Total Estimated Cost 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation 65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. O 0 O 0z 0d 0 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR, 2'3'4 Bayous D'Arbonne and Comrney, LA 1"2'4 Big Black River, MS"1,4,5 Big Sunflower River, MS1,4'6'7 Boeuf River, LA"13' 4'7'8'9 Claiborne County Port, MS Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA'5 Homochitto River, MS4 Lake Providence Harbor, LA Little Missouri River, AR1,4'5 Little River, LA"4,5,"0 Little Tallahatchie River, MS"'7 Madison Parish Port, LA Mouth of Yazoo River, MS '7 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal Overton-Red River Waterway, LA Pearl River, MS Red River below Fulton, AR"' 6"7 "' Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX1 '17 's Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX' Removings snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" Rosedale Harbor, MS Saline River, AR"3'4',5 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS"4'5 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA1 " 8"'13 Yalobusha River, MS1,4'5",14 -- 1931 -- 1941 -- 1895 -- 1942 -- 1949 -- 1985 Complete 1971 -- 1910 -- 1985 -- 1873 -- 1890 -- 1913 -- 1985 -- 1953 -- 193712 -- 1985 -- 1985 -- 1978 -- 1969 -- 1976 -- 1948 -- 1985 -- 1931 -- 1939 -- 1949 -- 1937 12-17 $ 45,874 19,000 15,000 560,027 30,000 2,000,000 202,817 15,482 208,537 19,992 1,500 19,000 656,000 1,179,211 8,562,908 1,963,806 $ 42,857 37,804 459,328 103,737 614,180 452,611 8,518 5,808,391 999,867 1,041,024 4,387,192 3,627,082 2,147,890 Dec. 1983 Dec. 1914 Nov. 1963 1 1 1 Dec. 1980 1956 1956 150,800 2,000,000 Sep. 1978 26,900 43,481 38,367 7,000 272,500 5,717,180 12,792 173,066 85,352 15,936 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,209,895 Yellow Bend Port, AR Complete 1991 3,793,069 733,519 Aug. 1991 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doe. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doe. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 19. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-E OUACIIITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,740' Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,181 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $153,904,7434 1. 2. 3. 4. See individual reports herein. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. Actual cost of completed project. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was $4,190,000. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR 2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,000' Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA -- -- -- -- 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 -- -- -- -- 243,336' Caddo Lake, LA1 Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,000' Garland City, AR1'6 -- -- -- -- 1,450,000' Maniece Bayou, AR -- -- -- -- 970,032' McKinney Bayou, AR7'8 -- -- -- -- 5,610,000' Posten Bayou, AR and LA2 '6'9 -- -- -- -- 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA' -- -- -- -- 66,775,000' Total 99,191,885 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Details presented in individual report herein. Construction on this project not started. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA .......................................... $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) ................................. 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ..... ................................. .... ........................... 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ....................................... 480,000 East Point.......... ............................................... ........... 67,000 Garland City, AR .................................................................. 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ............. ..................................... 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................................ .............. 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA ................... 1,560,000 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. Inactive. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. Joint-use pool (sediment). Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,200' 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,529' 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5'6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481' 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,006' 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,92718 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,000' 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711,3 4 West Agurs, LA Levee and appurtenauces 1976 0 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1999 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' 1956 $1,896,826 $ -- Apr. 1955 Bayou Bodceau and Tributaries AR and LA 1995 1,037,952 1,600,919 -- Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA' 1948 319,200 353,298 Jan. 1948 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 1985 -- 6,098,704 Apr. 1961 Bayou Pierre, LA 1985 -- 319,527 FY 1939 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 2 1951 243,3362 -- Jun. 1939 Big Black River, MS3 1956 910,185 670,750 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3'4 1966 248,823 -- 3 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA"5 '6 1945 -- -- -- Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR 1985 34,023,108 100,910,009 Oct. 1955 Caddo Lake Dam, LA 1986 -- 2,160,363 -- Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA 1978 1,655,700 -- Jul. 1978 Canal 43, AR 1997 898,061 -- Aug. 1990 Chauvin Bayou, LA 1995 4,245,863 -- -- Colfax, Grant Parish, LA"7 1938 70,348 -- -- DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR 1985 72,033,992 71,544,955 Dec. 1971 East Point, LA 1969 286,069 3,051,536 Aug. 1968 Garland City, AR 1976 1,335,841 -- Jul. 1974 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA"3 1941 38,809 -- Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR 3 1941 88,006 -- Homochitto River, MS3 1956 205,000 144,650 Maniece Bayou, AR 2 1970 970,9322 -- Aug. 1969 Monroe Floodwall, LA 1984 2,560,000 -- -- Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 1951 -- -- -- Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR 1985 16,516,689 70,801,783 May 1950 Natchez Port Area, MS3'4 1969 538,000 -- 12-22 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1999 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Natchitoches Parish, LA"2' 1956 1,529,478 -- Aug. 1955 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS 1986 2,790,127 -- 1987 Pineville, Red River, LA 3'4 1953 232,426 -- Dec. 1951 Lead Bayou, MS 1991 1,961,089 -- Nov. 1988 Porter Bayou 1995 1,049,278 -- Sep. 1993 Posten Bayou, AR8 1973 -- -- -- Poverty Point, LA 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 Red River Parish, LA"3 1939 149,435 -- 3 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 Red River Waterway, 1994 855,497 -- -- Shreveport, LA to Index, LA9 Saline Point, LA"'3 1945 124,111 -- -- Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA 1985 -- 2,176,655 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ........... ................................................... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA .................................................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ........................................................ 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA .................................................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR .................................................................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................................................................ 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 9. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 12-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 1990 May 17, 1950 974,000 -- S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Buffalo River, MS1 1940 Nov 1986 -- -- McKinney Bayou, Finn 19632 Aug 1977 -- -- Bayou Segment, AR 1. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 2. Date Authorized. 12-24 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) FY 99 COSTS Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation Studies (110) Red River Navigation Study, S.W. Ark. - 010436 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention (120) Wallace Lake, Lake - 010571 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 Special Investigations (171) -17250 Review of FERC Licenses (172) - 053857 Subtotal COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND NON FEDERAL INTERAGENCIES (180) Hobolchitto Creek - 28004 PAS - MS-Ross Barnett Operation Model - 28002 PAS Archusa Creek Water Park - 28003 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services - 82030 Jemez Springs, NM/Waggoner County - 83006 Quick Response - 82045 Special Studies - Monticello, MS Technical Services - 82040 Subtotal Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 247,113 47,114 294,227 247,113 47,114 294,227 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 40,995 40,995 30,081 30,081 554 554 71,630 71,630 27,483 27,436 54,919 33,502 38,894 72,396 4,263 5,446 9,709 65,248 71,776 137,024 392,111 118,890 511.001 14,866 14,866 11,914 11,914 5,201 5,201 18,892 18,892 59,940 59,940 110,813 110,813 8,014 8,014 8,014 8,014 118,827 118,827 $ 510,938 118,890 629,828 12-25 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Flood Control (Cont.) 1. Navigation work under special authorization ..................... 13-1 Flood Control Page 2. Simmon Field Control Structure ......... 13-1 3. Inspection of completed flood control projects ...... ...................... 13-2 4. Flood control work under special authorization ..................... . 13-2 5. Ecosystem Restoration work under special authorization .................. 13-2 6. General Regulatory Program ........... 13-2 7. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ........................ 13-2 Tables Page Table 13-A Cost & Financial Statement .... 13-3 Table 13-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 13-3 Table 13-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. . 13-4 Table 13-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. . 13-5 Table 13-E Deauthorized Projects ........ 13-7 Table 13-F Active General Investigations .. 13-8 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. During this period, $9,099 was expended on Pemiscot County Harbor; $14,138 was expended on New Madrid County Harbor, MO; $23,605 was expended on Blytheville Harbor, AR; $88,547 on Northwest Tennessee Regional Harbor, TN; and $28,756 was expended on Des Arc, AR. 2. SIMMON FIELD CONTROL STRUCTURE Location. Simmon Control Structure is located at the southeast corner of the Big Lake State Wildlife Management area in Mississippi County Arkansas approximately 15 miles southwest of Blytheville, Arkansas. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on August 28, 1998, under the authority of Section 1135(b) of WRDA 1986 as amended. The project consist of replacing an existing outlet control structure that is non-functional. The proposed control structure assures water level management from elevation 230 feet to 236 feet NGVD. The estimated construction cost for the project is $956,500. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the local Sponsor, The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, on May 28, 1998. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, right-of-way, and relocations required for project 13-1 Page I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 construction and cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is about 85 percent complete. The remaining work is scheduled for completion by November 1999. 3. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $190,998 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1999, was $3,110,296. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 4. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During this period $836 was expended on Section 205 Coordination Account; $28,142 was expended on Mayfield Creek & Tribs; $7,199 was expended on Main Ditch #8, Pemiscot County, MO; $18,187 was expended on Little River Diversion, Dutchtown, MO; $900 was expended on Scott City, MO; $36,951 was expended on Baxter Bottom, Tipton County, TN; $35,071 was expended on Rossville, TN, $39,477 was expended on Huntington, TN, $36,677 was expended on Crockett Creek, Finley, TN. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1999, $1,881 was expended on Section 14 Coordination Account; $27,656 was expended on Town Creek, Somerville, TN; $22,641 on Coon Creek, Lenox, TN; $20,086 on Cooper Creek, Cherry Valley Sewage Lago. Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. In FY 99, Federal cost was $344,138 for disaster preparedness; and $78,586 for Emergency Operations. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs incurred in FY 99 were: Federal Hatchie River Alcorn/Tippah Counties Cross County Ditch, II-1, AR Cross County Ditch II-2, AR Total $20,381 30,880 32,760 $84,021 5. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $501,844 was expended on Simmons Field Control Structure, Mississippi County, AR; $8,061 on Initial Appraisals; and $1,427 on Coordination Account Funds. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Public Law 104- 303, Sec. 206 During FY 99, $10,648 was expended on Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration; $667 was expended on Coordination Account Funds; $9,982 was expended on Preliminary Restoration Plans. 6. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGAM Permit Evaluations Enforcement Total 7. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Local Preparedness National Preparedness National Emergency Facilities Readiness Training & Exercise Task Force Total $ 897,387 244.975 $1,142,362 $ 11,255 117,835 4,638 3,419 $137,147 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 Mayfield Creek, New Work TN Approp. 150,000 272,000 -- -- - 3,188,400 Cost 185,912 295,168 45,626 28,143 3,164,181 3. Simmons Field New Work Control Structure Approp. 0 0 210,000 496,000 Cost 3,629 20,000 210,786 501,844 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Mayfield Creek, KY (See Sec. 2 of Text) Approved Sept. 26, 19911 as amended WRDA as amended Simmon Field Control Structure Approved Aug. 28, 1998 1986, Sec 1135(b) 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO 1984 $768,992 $ 4,418,285 Dec. 1980 Helena Harbor, AR 1984 90,847 7,886,326 Sep. 1963 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY 1984 149,827 8,418,874 Jan. 1963 New Madrid Harbor, MO6 1984 196,373 2,054,030 Oct. 1970 Obion River, TN' 3 1911 28,716 -- -- Osceola Harbor, AR 1984 269,115 11,240,894 Nov. 1974 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers4'5 1948 -- 318,8334 White River, AR (below Newport) 1984 169,994 42,362,249 -- Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 1984 586,500 14,028,976 1959 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries." 6. WRDA 92 (Section 102) modified authorization by directing the Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of New Madrid County Harbor constructed by non-Federal interest. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Bradford, TN Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL' Cypress Creek, McNairy City, TN Dails Creek, Holly Grove, AR Drinkwater Sewer, MO Dyersburg, TN' Dyersburg, TN (SW) Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Hatchie River, Alcomrn Co., MS Humboldt, TN Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN Loosahatchie Intreceptor Sewer, Shelby Millington, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL3 Nixon Creek, TN' Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) N. Second St. at Wolf River, Memphis, TN Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN Raft Creek, AR Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR Tar Creek, Chester County, TN Treasure Island, MO Turner Creek, Corinth, MS US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 1977 1984 1964 1998 1996 1984 1962 1981 1993 1985 1987 1989 1960 1998 1996 1955 1952 1983 1987 1993 1983 1991 1991 1993 1997 1985 1985 1997 1981 1987 1984 1983 $ 70,363 95,061 147,000 10,883 462 1,494,828 229,6492 1,820,869 421,898 155,280 85,200 1,141,407 11,141,199 394,000 830,898 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 259,000 830,781 249,999 367,012 124,954 156,565 245 238,000 161,000 1,161 861,528 100,600 369,200 1,674,180 -- Dec. 1983 -- Feb. 1964 -- Jun. 1980 -- Jun. 1962 -- Oct. 1976 -- Sept. 1991 -- Aug. 1985 -- Feb. 1986 -- Apr. 1988 -- May 1959 -- Dec 1997 -- Dec. 1995 -- Oct. 19594 -- Dec. 1951 -- Nov. 1981 -- Dec. 1986 -- Feb. 1992 -- Sep. 1980 -- Jan. 1990 -- Sep. 1990 -- Jul. 1991 -- Dec. 1984 -- Sep. 1985 -- Mar. 1978 -- Mar. 1987 -- Mar. 1983 -- Oct. 1976 13-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (CONT.) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 2. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 3. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 4. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For: Deauthorized Expended Expended Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR 1977 May 6, 81 -- -- Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR 1937 May 6, 81 -- -- Huntingdon, TN 1983 Sep 80 2,900,281 -- Long Lake Area, Helena, AR 1983 Jul 83 61,281 -- Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN -- Nov 29, 95 -- -- 13-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 13-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 99 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $35,156 Intra Agency Water Resources Development-14713 28,660 North American Waterfowl Mgmt (176) - 53904 7,810 71,626 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Coop with Other Water Agencies (181) - 53907 $ 7,304 34,974 PAS - AR - Delta Counties (186) -5005 $42,278 TOTAL (Category (100) $113,904 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Mgmt Services - 082030 $15,846 Technical Services - 082040 60,766 Quick Responses - 082045 3,767 SS Marion, AR - 083125 0 SS Aubrey, AR - 083126 394 Jonesboro, AR - 083180 21,620 Kennett, MO - 083181 4,875 TOTAL (Category 200) $107268 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (Category 600) White River to Newport, AR - 060740 891916 TOTAL (Category 600) 891916 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,113,088 13-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri which lie in the drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on the left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. The St. Louis District territory encompasses Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) .. . 2. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam) . . . 3. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL ......... 4. St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL ......... 5. Navigation work under special authorization.................... Flood Control 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO .............. 7. Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO ......... 8. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ........ 9. Meramec River Basin (Valley Park), M O .......................... 10. Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... 11. Ste. Genevieve, MO.............. 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 13. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 14-2 14-2 14-2 14-3 14-3 14-3 14-3 14-4 14-4 14-5 14-5 14-6 14-6 27,000 square miles. The District also includes a drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. The Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in a separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. The portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in the report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. Page 14-6 14-6 14-6 14-6 14-7 15. General Regulatory Functions ......... 16. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ....................... 17. Other Programs and Activities ........ Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 18. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program.............. 19. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) ............... Tables Table 14-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 14-8 Table 14-B Authorizing Legislation ..... .14-10 Table 14-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 14-15 Table 14-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 14-16 Table 14-E Deauthorized Projects ...... 14-18 Table 14-F Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ 14-20 Table 14-G Active General Investigations (96X3121) .... 14-21 Miscellaneous 14. Ecosystem restoration work under special authorization............... 14-6 14-1 IMPROVEMENTS Page Miscellaneous (Cont.) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DISTRICT) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DISTRICT) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. This section includes Lock & Dam 24 Major Rehabilitation, Lock & Dam 25 Major Rehabilitation, and Melvin Price Locks & Dam. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as "Middle Mississippi", between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. (See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (Oct 1999 price level) of $274,374,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at a cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contracts continue on stone dike and revetment construction; as well as engineering design, supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 76 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. Following the great Mississippi River Flood of 1993, it became apparent that the Chain of Rocks, East Canal Levee was not performing as intended. Sand boils were developing along a sizeable reach at flood elevations considerably below design height. Emergency repairs were completed in FY 97. Deficiency corrections (additional berms, relief wells, and a pump station) are estimated at $23,728,000 (Oct 1999 price level). These corrections were initiated in FY 99. Maintenance. Work consists of approximately 2,000 feet of dike repair and 5,000 feet of revetment repair yearly. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging perform channel dredging removing 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 cubic yards of material (average year) from main channel. Condition and operation studies, 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 4. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL Location. The project area includes both sides of the Mississippi River from miles 138.8 to 208.8 above the Ohio River (generally, the limits of the Port of Metropolitan St. Louis). Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized project includes improvements in two areas: the North Riverfront area in Missouri (which is served by the St. Louis Municipal Docks) and the Tri-City Port area along the east bank of the Chain of Rocks Canal in Illinois. The principal project at the St. Louis Municipal Docks is an L-dike sediment control structure in the river to provide reliable water access to the dock when the river is low. The principal project at the Tri-City Port area is a 210 ft. wide harbor along 6,900 ft. of the Chain of Rocks Canal. The North Riverfront project and half the Tri-City harbor (3.450 ft.) would be constructed in Phase 1, and the second half of the Tri-City harbor in Phase 2 approximately 10 years later. Estimated cost of the project (1998) is $15,074,000 Federal and $29,734,000 Non-Federal. A March 1986 Reevaluation Report described model tests which showed that the L-dike sediment control structure recommended for the St. Louis Municipal Docks would not be effective but that appropriate configuration of a new outer wall for the docks, referred to as the Prototype River Access Improvement Structure (PRAIS), would divert currents so as to control scour and sedimentation and maintain sufficient water depths for the needs of the harbor. Local cooperation. The District coordinated with the two local sponsors and found that (1) the city of St. Louis Port Authority supports the PRAIS project and (2) the Tri-City Regional Port Authority wants the Corps to consider the possibility of reducing the length of their Phase I harbor to 1,800 ft. and shifting its location so that it is a northern extension of the existing Tri-City harbor (the authorized project length of 6,900 ft. would be maintained by increasing the length of the Phase 2 harbor to 5,100 ft.). Operations and results during the fiscal year. Headquarters reviewed the District's 1992 letter report and directed that new economic studies and other work be accomplished and documented in a General Reevaluation Report (GRR) with a Project Study Plan (PSP). Preparation of the GRR began in FY 97. In FY 99, Tri-City Regional Port District requested an evaluation of a new harbor location just below the mouth of the Chain of Rocks Canal. Evaluation of this site began in FY 99 and will continue in FY 00. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION No activity in FY 99. 6. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO Location. The levee system is located adjacent to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, Illinois. Existing Project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system have, for many years, been experiencing a significant number of slides associated with design deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure during flood events. The recommended plan will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. Estimated cost (1997) is $109,018,000 Federal and $4,374,000 non-Federal. Resumption of project initiated. New slides were discovered during the 1997 spring levee inspections. The contract to repair the Blue Waters Levee in the Metro East Drainage and Levee District was completed Oct. 1997. Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance with policies established for the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor is required to operate and maintain all works after completion. Supplemental assurances have been executed for the portion of the remedial work that is 100% federally funded. Operations and results during fiscal year. No activity in FY 99. 7. CAPE GIRARDEAU-JACKSON, MO Location. Missouri, along the right bank of the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 above the Ohio River. Existing Project. The project includes a 157 acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile of 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of channel improvements on Walker Branch, eight bridge replacements; recreational/environmental features and non structural features which are not going to be implemented at this time. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal project cost (1999) is $36,694,000. Non-Federal cost is $13,746,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on May 25, 1990 with a modification to the LCA executed on Oct. 27, 1992. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described in the FY 1991 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design continued on the detention reservoir, which is scheduled for award in May 2000. 8. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood flow of 1,300,000 cfs which was originally considered a 200-year frequency flood; however, with the completion of retention reservoirs upstream this protection is currently considered a 500-year level of protection. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies in the early 1980's have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Severe flooding which has resulted in National Disaster Declarations each of the last four years for the Harding Ditch and Cahokia Canal areas resulted in a new Congressional appropriation in FY 98 to restart a general reevaluation of the interior area. Congress added funds in FY 1998 to continue this effort. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work (1999) is $37,861,000 Federal and $15,759,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. For work under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, PL 100-202, local interests have entered into three Local Cooperation Agreements (LCA) which cover all of the work in the Flood Protection Rehabilitation project. Construction work under the first two LCAs complete, and construction work under the third LCA is underway. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed for repairs to the North St. Louis Pump Station. Ditch rehabilitation work continued, and design of relief well rehabilitation completed. 9. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN (VALLEY PARK), MISSOURI Location. The project is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, adjacent to the left bank of the Meramec River between miles 20.7 and 22.1 above the confluence with the Mississippi River. 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 2(h), Public Law 97-128, Dec. 29, 1981, and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and 1999. It will afford partial flood protection to the area. The project provides for construction of 3.2 miles of earthen levee with six gravity drains, three closure structures, interior ponding areas and 33 relief wells required for under-seepage control. Recreational features include standard play equipment, multi-user courts, play field areas, picnic tables, comfort stations, parking areas and hiking/biking trails. Estimated total project cost (1999) $39,081,000; $29,232,000 Federal, and $9,849,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Valley Park, Missouri is the local sponsor. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 12, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. The first two construction contracts are complete. Construction continued on Levee Item IIIA, and design continued on the remainder of the project. 10. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Green and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing Project. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 miles of new levee, altering a pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. This project would provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,365 of which are highly productive agricultural lands. A General Design Memorandum (GDM), completed in 1986, indicated that the plan was not economically justified at the interest rate used at the time. The project was declared inactive on Jun. 3, 1987. As a result of the Great Flood of 1993 and the inundation of Illinois State Highway 16/100 within the project area, the 1995 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill included funding to perform a flood damage reduction study. Local Cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are described on page 14-11 of FY 1980 Annual Report except that cost sharing policies established by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL-99-662, will also apply. The Nutwood Drainage and Levee District is the local sponsor. The cost sharing agreement for preconstruction engineering and design (PED) was executed in July 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. PED continued in FY 99. The present total Federal project cost (1999) is $11,539,000; non-Federal cost is $13,513,000. 11. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO Location. The City of Ste. Genevieve is located in Ste. Genevieve County at the edge of the Mississippi River floodplain about 54 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The authorizing language states "Congress finds that, in view of the historic preservation benefits resulting from the project," the overall project consists of four parts. Part 1 is a major levee and associated features that will protect the town from the Urban Design Flood on the Mississippi River. Parts 2 and 3 are channel improvements on tributary streams that flow through the town, North and South Gabouri Creek, respectively. Part 4 is recreation features on flood control lands. The Corps of Engineers and the project sponsor are concentrating on designing and constructing Part 1, and Parts 2, and 3 and 4 have been placed in a deferred category. Estimated total project cost (1999) is $47,653,000; $34,532,000 Federal, and $13,121,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The project sponsor is the Ste. Genevieve Joint Levee Commission. The City of Ste. Genevieve, Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 2, and Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 3 hold membership on the Commission. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major progress is being made on Part 1 of the project. The North Closure and the Highway 61 relocation have been completed. Contracts were awarded for the pump station, middle closure, and levee. 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $430,566 for the Fiscal Year 1999. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $10,947,760. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 14-F. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. See Table 14-F. Emergency flood control activities - repair flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $342,001 for Disaster Preparedness, $3,023 for Emergency Operations, and $153,923 for Rehabilitation. Miscellaneous 14. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $5,440 was expended on Coordination Account; $3,117 on Initial Appraisals; $3,635 on Carlyle Lake Wildlife Management; $56,388 on Rend City Wetlands Restoration; $72,914 on Pool 25 Water Control; and $9,464 on Confluence Greenway. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Public Law 104- 303, Sec. 206. In FY 99, $4,893 was expended on Coordination Account funds; $11,794 on Preliminary Restoration Plans; and $18,980 on Ted Shanks Area Reforestation. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 15. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluations Enforcement Studies Total Regulatory $1,029,732 284,341 41 $1,314,114 16. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Local Preparedness National Preparedness Readiness Training Total $ 98,049 32,531 4,999 $135,579 17. OTHER PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES In FY 99, $1,285,562 was expended on Native American Grave Protection for operation and maintenance. 18. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation Projects, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. (The St. Louis District's involvement has been limited to Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects and Long Term Resource Monitoring.) The overall program, involving five states and three engineer districts, is administered by the Mississippi Valley Division. In the St. Louis District, three habitat rehabilitation projects have been constructed. These are Clarksville Management Area, Missouri, Dresser Island, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri. All projects are being operated and maintained by the state of Missouri. Through FY 1999, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $25,208,000 for design and construction of Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects (HREP), 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT $1,293,000 for Long Term Resource Monitoring (LTRM), $1,690,000 for Program Management; and $482,300 for Habitat Needs Assessment. The authorization limit for the overall program projected over a 10-year period is $191,415,000. During FY 99, expenditures of included the following: Baseline Monitoring Batchtown Biological Response Monitoring Calhoun Point Cuivre Island Dike Alterations Habitat Needs Assessment Pools 25/26 Program Management Project Evaluation LTRM Schenimann Chute Stag Island Stump Lake Swan Lake $3,069,963 $ 75,506 363,026 3,747 42,121 158,730 1,263 448,756 11,089 211,040 15,883 1,214 487 21,428 1,715,673 Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. The local sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement projects is usually the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in coordination with the state of Missouri or the state of Illinois. A PCA agreement with the state of Missouri was completed in FY 97 for the Cuivre Island project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. During FY 1999, Habitat Needs Assessment continued and plans and specifications for Batchtown Phase I were completed. Construction continued at Swan Lake was completed at Cuivre Island Stump Lake. Habitat and biological response monitoring activities continued at the Missouri projects of Dresser Island, Clarksville Refuge, and Pharrs Island. 19. FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (FUSRAP) On Oct. 13, 1997, Congress transferred the management of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) to the Corps of Engineers, via the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1998. The St. Louis District was chosen to remediate low-level radioactive contamination, which resulted from activities conducted by the Manhattan Engineer/Atomic Energy Commission, at the five St. Louis area sites. These sites include Madison, Illinois, and Latty Avenue, St. Louis Airport (SLAPS), St. Louis Airport and Vicinity Properties (SLAPS VPs), and St. Louis Downtown (SLDS), Missouri. Cleanup will follow the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Major accomplishments in FY 99 include the removal of 10,700 cubic yards of contaminated material from SLDS and the removal of 34,000 cubic yards of contaminated material from SLAPS. Under the approved SLDS Record of Decision (ROD), the Corps of Engineers completed the remediation of the City Properties and began work in the Mallinckrodt plant. In the North County area, the construction of the SLAPS sedimentation basin and the stabilization of the East End and North Ditch area significantly reduced the migration of contamination from SLAPS. The Corps made progress on removing the Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS, Latty Avenue) piles. Final remedial work on the North County Sites, which include SLAPS, HISS, and the SLAPS VPs, will be accomplished according to the remedy selected from the Feasibility Study/Proposed Plan, which will be presented to the public in FY 00. The Corps also began developing a final plan in FY 99 to address contamination at the Madison Site. The public will receive this plan in FY 00. 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 3. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (Contrib. Funds) 7. Cape Girardeau Jackson, MO (Contrib. Funds) 8. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 9. Meramec R. Basin, Valley Park, MO (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4,560,000 3,617,000 2,768,000 2,908,000 $254,050,6001 4,832,000 3,954,760 2,661,040 2,955,533 253,892,495' 19,725,000 17,858,442 11,479,900 15,042,800 404,288,1212 19,772,318 17,112,937 12,376,769 14,929,842 404,065,8462 20,000 14,000 133,000 48,572 60,250 10,000 13,000 98,259 23,219 5,000 8,859,000 9,609 8,857,574 60,250 33,219 750,000 446,000 2,790,000 1,175,000 26,173,000 1,694,594 514,368 2,783,256 1,068,051 26,039,460 -414,597 423,700 -317,820 21,128 99,980 151,540 2,226,320 322,755 297,619 2,190,201 3,393,000 2,162,000 1,904,000 602,000 43,791,3263 3,537,119 2,086,086 1,914,246 712,631 43,690,1444 1,410,000 350,000 150,000 1,540,600 183,210 415,635 0 7,557,600 86,966 7,513,546 2,320,000 459,000 1,004,000 5,212,000 14,087,000 2,920,661 513,357 917,231 4,834,388 13,586,456 340,000 405,325 30,000 108,400 -1,868 108,206 0 55,614 840,500 588,562 14-8 TABLE 14-A (Continued) ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 11. Ste. Genevieve, New Work MO Approp. 1,000,000 Cost -92 311 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. -- 1,314 Cost -- 434 19. FUSRAP (Total) New Work Approp. -- 124,999, Cost -- 124,999, Madison New Work Approp. -- 6 Cost -- 6 Latty Avenue New Work Approp. -- 28,737 Cost -- 28,737. St. Louis Airport New Work Approp. -- 30,717 Cost -- 30,717 St. Louis Airport New Work & Vie. Properties Approp. -- 26,509 Cost -- 26,509 St. Louis Downtown New Work Approp. -- 39,030 Cost -- 39,030 Oakridge Transition New Work Approp. -- Cost -- 1. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 2. In addition $1,139,000 was expended for rehabilitation. 3. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 4. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 ,493 ,638 ,392 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 -- 0 1,369,216 1,413,000 1,220,072 25,494,000 22,481,215 144,000 141,046 3,730,000 3,488,582 15,396,000 13,319,210 2,037,000 1,720,014 3,987,000 3,621,690 200,000 190,673 5,765,000 5,093,835 1,168,525 1,346,101 43,550,000 41,802,804 300,000 268,127 4,845,000 2,775425 22,252,000 23,190,751 1,086,000 978,827 15,067,000 14,588,792 0 882 9,765,000 6,743,233 3,896,163 3,000,565 194,043,000 189,283,019 450,000 415,173 37,312,000 35,001,007 68,365,000 67,226,961 29,632,000 29,207,841 58,084,000 57,240,482 200,000 191.555 14-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 12. 1996 S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 104-303 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. "..i.s modified to add fish and wildlife and habitat restoration as project purpose." MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 3 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO.26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 2 miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. Modified to provide construction of cost-shared recreation facilities within the state of Illinois Modified to allow cost-shared recreation with other non-Federal interests and authorized a 24,000 square foot visitor center. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Cong. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong. Public Law 102-580, 102nd Cong. 14-10 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19542 Jul. 3, 19583 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 31, 1992 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 12, 1996 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended. Section 107 Nov. 26, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 28, 1938 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Nov. 28, 1990 Amended project for recreation to include other contiguous nonproject lands, including those referred to as the Alton Commons. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO & IL (See Section 4 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Apr. 30, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes navigation improvements. The Secretary shall complete a limited reevaluation of the authorized St. Louis Harbor Project in the vicinity of the Chain of Rocks Canal, Illinois, consistent with the authorized purposes of that project, to include evacuation of waters collecting on the land side of the Chain of Rocks Canal East Levee ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO (See Section 6 of Text) Authorized construction of levees to protect area from flooding from the Mississippi River. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO (See Section 7 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 18, 1994, the Water Resources and Development Act of 1996 authorizes construction, including nonstructural measures, at a total cost of $45,414,000 ($33,030,000 Federal; $12,384,000 non-Federal) COLDWATER CREEK, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated Aug 9, 1988, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. Public Law 104-303 Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303 Special report on record in OCE Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. 14-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1987 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels, and bridges. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MO As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental improvements. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 9 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. (See Section 14 of Text) Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 17, 1999 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control measures. Modified to authorize construction at a maximum Federal expenditure of $35,000,000 MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. RIVER DES PERES, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief Engineers dated May 23, 1989, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO (See Section 11 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiplepurpose project. Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 106-53, 106th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 14-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, designation. 89th Cong. Oct. 13, 1997 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Energy and Water (See Sec. 19 of text.) Development Approp. Carry out remediation at five St. Louis Area sites - Act of 1998 Madison, Illinois, Latty Avenue, St. Louis Airport, St. Louis Airport and Vicinity Properties, and St. Louis Downtown, MO. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Inactive. 3. All work completed. 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO' 1883 $ 12,000 $ -- -- Moccasin Springs, MO 1969 76,4362 -- -- Southeast Missouri Port, MO 1993 3,466,522 1,907,919 Apr. 89 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL 1961 2,653,194 1961 -- 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 14-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, MO 1996 313,180,128 80,524,402 -- Cache River Diversion, IL 1953 2,837,114 -- 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 1965 5,157,805 -- 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL 1981 42,819,400 91,359,178 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 185,700 -- 1955 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL 1981 2,818,000 -- Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL 1959 5,889,500 -- 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL 1976 1,720,000 -- 1976 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)' 1950 55,415 -- Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)' 1953 -- -- 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1952 50,000 -- Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1946 25,000 -- Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL 1970 1,154,800 -- 1958 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 4,677,900 -- 1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL 1981 6,829,069 -- Mar. 1981 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 297,460 -- 1949 Kaskaskia River, IL2 1989 147,387,000 27,564,851 1988 Lake Shelbyville, IL 1981 44,000,000 95,751,716 Sep. 1978 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 589,000 -- 1988 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 25,043,300 -- 1989 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1944 249,738 -- 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 1955 164,183 -- 1955 14-16 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO 1987 2,137,000 -- -- Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO 1980 79,265,166 -- Jan. 1980 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures -- 85,422 -- Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL 1957 939,569 -- 1957 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 670,000 -- 1984 Perry County Drainage and Levee3 District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 Pine Ford Lake, MO 1996 3,644,000 --- Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL4 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL5.6 1989 43,700,900 71,187,710 1988 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 Urban areas at Alton, IL 1960 192,000 -- -- Village of New Athens, IL 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 1967 91,952 -- 1967 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL' 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 14-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Exp Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan D&L District Illinois River, IL Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos 1, 3, and 4 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek D&L District, IL Eldred, IL Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing D&L District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL 1-38 Lake, MO Indian Creek Area Illinois River, IL Irondale Lake, MO Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meramec Park Lake, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL Richland Creek, IL Riverland Levee District, MO Scott County D&L District Illinois River, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO 1967 1959 1964 1963 1962 1971 19621 1979 1979 1978 1967 1967 1958'1 1959 1969 1936 -- _ 19541 1950'1 1936 1 Year authorized. 14-18 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Oct 78 PL 100-676 Jan 90 PL 100-676 Jan 90 Nov 79 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 Nov 81 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 79 Nov 79 Oct 78 Dec 81 Nov 79 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 PL 100-676 10Aug89 Aug 77 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 Nov 77 Nov 77 $ 22,000 4,984,500 1,920,600 -- -- -- -- -- -- 496,000 37,682,514 1,866,910 401,000 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Exp St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO 1936 Nov 77 -- -- Union Lake, MO 1979 PL 100-676 4,931,154 -- Jan 90 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 1936 Nov 77 -- -- 14-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Cost Non-Federal Total Bois Brule L&D District, MO Grafton, IL Hillview D&LD, IL Modoc Levee & Drainage District, Prairie, IL Section 205 Coordination Account St. Peters, MO Wellston Branch, MO $ 7,899 9,650 3,057 440,285 10,165 1,602,172 91 805 2,095,033 Emergency StreamBank & Shoreline Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) Caulks Creek, Metro St. Louis Sewer, MO Fayette County, Highway 23 Lincoln City Road 729 Lincoln County Road Missouri Bottoms Levee, MO Section 14 Coordination Account St. Louis Water Lines, MO O'Fallon Sewage Lagoons, MO Shotwell Creek, MO South Senior High School Wildwood, MO Site 1 $ 15,186 14,683 81 2,155 7,698 13,398 105,237 17,594 7,140 520 96 176 26,150 34,049 9,650 3,057 38 440,323 10,165 184,000 1,786,172 91 805 210,188 2,305,221 15,186 14,683 81 2,155 7,698 13,389 18,764 124,001 17,594 7,140 520 26176 Total Section 14 Project Flood Control (Section 205, P. L 858, preauthorization) 209,859 228,623 14-20 , IVV. iVV. *..,V ,1Vd.L.. l . ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-G ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Project FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Alexander and Pulaski Counties,IL-12217 Ballwin, MO-10463 Chesterfield, MO-10457 Festus and Crystal City, MO-10458 Kimmswick, MO-10459 Lower River des Peres, MO-10460 Wood River Levee, IL-10524 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) St. Louis Flood Protection, MO-17360 Wood River D&LD, IL-20180 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities(170) Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 Review of FERC Licenses-53857 Special Investigations-17250 Waterfowl Management Plan-53904 Subtotal Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) PAS - St. Louis Combined Sewer Outflow-29005 Coordination with Other Water Resources Agencies PAS - Kaskaskia Riverbank Erosion PAS - St. Louis County PAS - St. Clair County PAS - Jefferson Flood Hazard Study-29007 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIN DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Automated Information System Support (294)GCase-53916 Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, 82040, 82045, 83015, 83017, 83019, 83153, 83154 Hydrology Studies (260)-10463 TOTAL (Category 200) 125,241 26,413 261,580 83,802 466 59,386 38349 86,089 216,330 26,413 280,291 541,871 146,418 230,220 466 137,012 196,398 38.349 595,237 649,810 1,245,047 40,611 40,611 509 509 41,120 41,120 149,081 149,081 1,607 1,607 37,408 37,408 6.151 6.151 194,247 194,247 115 155 270 1,043 1,043 34,638 33,672 68,310 5,913 4,500 10,413 0 121 121 5.701 9.000 14,701 47,410 47,448 94,858 $878,014 697,258 1,575,272 5,228 5,228 211,500 211,500 17,607 17.607 234,335 234,335 14-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 14-G ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) Project FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Non-Federal Total ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Nutwood D&LD, IL-00623 $338,210 247,874 586,084 St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL-10184 417,019 417,019 Wood River D&LD, IL-20180 19,175 19,175 TOTAL (Category 600) $744,404 247,874 1,022,278 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 1,886,753 945 ,132 2,831,885 14-22 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Navigation 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL ........ 15-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN ........... 15-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ................. 15-3 4. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study .................... 15-3 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI ................. 15-4 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 15-4 Flood Control 7. Coralville Lake, IA................... 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA ....................... 9. Loves Park, IL ...................... 10. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA ... 11. Saylorville Lake, IA .................. 12. West Des Moines, IA ................. 13. Muscatine Island, IA ................. 14. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... 15. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 16. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... Miscellaneous 17. General Regulatory Functions.......... 18. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ........................... 19. Ecosystem Restoration Work under Special 15-4 15-5 15-5 15-5 15-6 15-6 15-7 15-7 15-7 15-7 15-7 15-7 Authorization.......................15-7 General Investigations 20. Surveys........................... 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 22. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .. Page 15-8 15-8 15-8 Tables Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement . . . . 15-9 Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 15-11 Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. 15-15 Table 15-D Not Applicable Table 15-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............ 15-16 Table 15-F Not Applicable Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects ....... .15-18 Table 15-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............ 15-19 Table 15-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....... .15-21 Table 15-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams ........... .15-22 Table 15-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost ..................... 15-23 Table 15-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost ... 15-24 Table 15-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project ................... 15-25 Table 15-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project ............ 15-25 Table 15-0 Active General Investigations ............. 15-26 15-1 IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title of 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On November 4, 1981, the Corps of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds were used by the counties to complete rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois filed an additional lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. In a preliminary decision on September 22, 1988, the court dismissed the claim for $3,722,572. A settlement agreement between the State of Illinois and the United States was signed on November 14, 1991. The agreement provided that Illinois release all claims against the United States as stipulated in the claims court and that the United States provide $4,750,000 to Illinois as reimbursement for previous repair work performed upon the canal bridges by Illinois. On Decemer 16, 1991, the U.S. Claims Court entered a judgment for $4,750,000 in favor of the State of Illinois. This judgment was paid in FY92. Once funds are received, principal work features to restore the canal to acceptable conditions consist of the repair or reconstruction of retaining walls, embankments, portions of the lock and dam structures, culverts, drainage ditches, and other related work features which the United States has maintained or has been obligated to maintain under previous agreements. These features are consistent with a Master Management Plan prepared by the Illinois Department of Conservation. NEPA documentation to assess remaining work items must be completed prior to initiation of construction. Local cooperation. A revised Supplemental Agreement with all work items remaining was executed between the state of Illinois and the Federal Government in April 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Construction work was performed for a total cost of $39,509. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). 15-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, Ii, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See Table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-for-restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded from present cost estimate. Land acquired for the project consisted 817.497 acres in fee and 1,186.484 acres in flowage easement. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See Table 15-J through 15-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by contract cutterhead pipeline dredge was performed in Starved Rock, LaGrange, and Peoria, at various locations at a cost of $987,900 with a total of 324,263 cubic yards of material being removed. Continued construction includes Starved Rock Headgate repairs. New construction includes Senate Island and Copperas Creek Dredge Material Disposal Facilities, concrete repairs at LaGrange Lock and Dam, and Lower Guidewall Keviel Rail at Peoria Lock and Dam. Maintenance for the navigation function continued at a cost of $12,957,500 (includes dredging costs). Maintenance of Recreation Features continued at a cost of $39,600. Total maintenance costs for Operation and Maintenance were $12,997,100 and $440,000 for Maintenance and Operations. Net credits to the project were $145,400, primarily as a result of collections from towboat companies for damages to lock and dam structures. Operation and Care: Operations for navigation continued at a cost of $9,910,600. Environmental Stewardship--Management of Natural Resources continued at a cost of $12,900. Operations for the Recreation Function continued at a cost of $268,500. Total operation costs were $10,192,000. Total operation and maintenance costs were $23,189,100, and Maintenance and Operations costs were $440,000. Rehabilitation: Major Rehabilitation was physically completed on the Illinois Waterway, Four Locks. FY 99 expenditures were $2,952,806. Alton Pool Operation: Costs for the year were $9,502 for lock operation; $40,958 for management of natural resources; $82,993 for water control management; $1,619 for environmental compliance management; and $103,948 for studies and surveys. Total operation costs were $239,000. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $736,755 for dredging; $1,553 for lock maintenance; $40,000 for boundry monument; $4,830 for water management equipment and $1,495; for supervision and administration. Total maintenance costs were $784,633. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $23,189,100. Rehabilitation costs were $2,952,800. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $1,023,653. Total costs incurred were $3,990,649. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI - ILLINOIS NAVIGATION STUDY Location. The study includes both the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway. The study area covers over 850 miles of navigable waterways and 29 locks and dams of the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony Falls near Minneapolis- St. Paul, Minnesota; downstream to the mouth of the Ohio River at Cairo; and the Illinois Waterway (eight locks and dams) from Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois, southwest to where the waterway joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, 348 miles long. The Upper Mississippi River system meanders through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Missiouri, and over 40 counties. The Illinois Waterway is located entirely within the State of Illinois. Existing project. The project consists of addressing the need for navigation improvement on the river system. Undertaken by three Corps Districts (St. Paul, Rock Island, and St. Louis), the purpose of the study is to examine information related to the existing condition of the structures and investigate system congestion (lockage delays, inadequate capacity, and recreation/conunmercial locking conflicts). The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The Feasibility Phase was continued during FY 1999 at a cost of $6,905,257. 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (USMRS-EMP), IL IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The project is authorized for those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term Resource Monitoring will provide the means for more informed managment of the UMRS. Also authorized was a study of the economic impacts of completed recreation, completed navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in 1986 utilizing funds provided by PL 99-88, FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. PL 99-662, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, further defined the program and provided for a 10 year implementation period and was extended to 15 years by PL 101-640, Water Resources Development Act of 1990. The Water Resources Development Act of 1999, P.L. 106-53, amends the previous authority by deleting recreation as a project purpose; increasing annual appropriation limits available to the program; authorizing an independent technical advisory committee; requiring submission of a report to Congress on a 6 year cycle that evaluates programs, accomplishments, assesses systemic habitat needs, and identifies any needed changes to the Program authorization. Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. WRDA 1999 establishes a cost sharing percentage of 35 percent for such projects. Operations During Fiscal Year. Expenditures during the year totaled $18,488,000. The majority of funds was expended on two primary program elements: habitat projects and long term resource monitoring. This fiscal year general design continued on 18 projects; construction was initiated on three projects; continued on 16 projects; and completed on six projects. Construction has essentially been completed on a total of 35 projects since the program was initiated. Data collection, analysis of data and production of technical and special reports was continued by contract with the Environmental Management Technical Center in Lake Onalaska, WI. The first report to Congress detailing the programs activities since the programs inception was completed and was submitted to Congress. A Habitat Needs Assessment continues and is scheduled for submission to Congress in Sep. 2000. This assessment will address the ecosystem needs along the Environmental Management Programs' reaches of the Upper Mississippi River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECTS NAVIGATION See Table 15-C. Flood Control 7. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,960 acres of land were 15-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT acquired in fee and flowage easements obtained for 3,673,343 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Operations during fiscal year. No new work was performed during FY 99. Operation and Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $3,305,942. 8. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20, and includes portions of Fort Dodge, IA. It also includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to complete the project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of 47 members; three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of the nine counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Letters of assurance have been received for 15 seperable elements. Local cooperation Agreements have been executed for five separable elements. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 99-88. Due to lack of funding, work remained deferred on eleven projects: Red Rock Trails Segment IVA; Botanical Center Park; Johnston Trail and Canoe Access; Raccoon River Trail; Raccoon River Regional Park; Polk City - Big Creek Trail; Webster City - Briggs Wood Trail; Dayton - Stratford Trail; Knoxville; Riverview Park; and Saylorville Barrier Dam Trail. Twelve projects in total have been completed to date. Costs incurred in FY 1999 were $43,199. 9. LOVES PARK, IL Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois-Wisconsin state line. Existing project. The project provides 100-year level of protection against flooding along Loves Park Creek. Protection measures consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The estimated project cost is $32,500,000 including $10,000,000 non-federal costs. See Table 15- B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 26, 1991. Operations during fiscal year. Planning, Engineering, and Design was continued to develop Plans and Specifications relative to Stage I. The city continued to work on the acquisition of rights-of-way for Stage I. Construction was completed on the revegetation contract for Stages IIA-2 and IIB. Total costs incurred during FY 99 were $301,000. 10. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 49,569.96 acres in fee and 26,832.575 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres. Estimated Federal cost is $43,500,000. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Additional Land Acquisition efforts were deferred due to lack of funding. Cost of Land acquisition coordination activities were $29,406. Operation and Maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $5,306,960. 11. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and uses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in the west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reach along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefitted. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 was completed in 1994. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 25,545,037 acres in fee and flowage easements for 1,471,404 acres. The estimated project cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 in non- Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, for recreational development. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project right-of-way has been transferred to the Iowa Department of Transportation, the project sponsor. Planning, Engineering, and Design efforts for the 86th street improvements project were turned over to Polk County. Costs incurred were $16,627. Operation and maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $4,325,243. The project is about 97 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 12. WEST DES MOINES, IA Location. The city is located in Polk County in central Iowa. Existing project. The project provides flood protection from the Raccoon River and Walnut Creek. The project consists of four stages: Stage I, 3,100 feet of levees and floodwalls along Walnut Creek north of Ashworth Road; Stage II, 9,000 feet of levees along the Raccoon River from Jordan Creek to 63rd Street, with 15-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT pump station; Stage IIIA, 4,500 feet of levees along the lower end of Walnut Creek; and Stage IIIB, 5,800 feet of levees and flood walls tieing Stages I and IIIA along Walnut Creek with pump station and tieing Stages II with IIIA along the Raccoon River. The project provides 100-year protection and will prevent 4.387 million dollars in average annual damages. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete. Total costs incurred during FY 99 were $90,480. 13. MUSCATINE ISLAND, IA Location. Muscatine Island lies on the west bank of the Mississippi River in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Iowa, adjacent and in the city of Muscatine, IA. The flood protection area of 30,800 acres is protected by 15.6 miles of existing sand and clay levees. The protected area consists of residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural areas and also includes U.S. Highway 61 and the Muscatine Municipal Airport. Existing Project. The existing levee will be raised to increase the level of protection from less than a 100-year flood and associated closure and utility improvements. The 200-year protection level is achieved by improving and raising approximately 6.6 miles of the existing levee system. Also included in the project is construction of an upstream railroad closure structure, improving drainage facilities, concrete I-wall sections and relocating existing utilities. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. The city of Muscatine and Muscatine Island Levee District are co-sponsors for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on 21 September 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Stage I (Railroad Closure) was completed in December 1996. Stage II (Levee Raise) was awarded in September 1997 and essentially completed in September 1998. Stage IIA (Industrial Levee Raise) and Stage II (Agricultural Levee Raise) are to be combined into one contract and the construction contract is scheduled to be awarded in March 1999. The entire project is scheduled to be completed in September 2000. Total costs incurred during FY 99 were $1,868,266. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $289,908. (See Table 15-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 15-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 15-I. 17. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluations Enforcement Total Regulatory 18. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Continuity of Operations National Preparedness Emergency Operations Center Support Readiness Trngt Exercise Total $1,450,577 316.088 $1,766,665 13,277 31,093 16,918 643,14323264,422 19. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99- 662, as amended (preauthorization). During FY 99, $8,723 was expended on Coordination Account Funds; $20,409 on Initial Appraisals; $968 on Mississippi River Mast Tree 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Planting; $403 on Buck Run Mod, MO; $34,610 on Oquawka Refuge Habitat; and $6,077 on Mill Creek/Milan Bottoms Habitat Restoration. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to Sec. 206, P. L. 104-303. In FY 99 $8,251 was expended on Section 206 Coordination Account; $51,428 on Preliminary Restoration Plans; and $15,667 on Whitebreast Watershed Ecosystem Restoration. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS There was one flood prevention study in progress during FY 99 at a cost of $71,266. There was one Review of Completed Projects at a cost of $6,905,257. There were four special studies at a cost of $1,848,411. Special Investigations, FERC, Interagency Water Resource Development, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $254,245. Total cost of surveys was $9,079,177. See Table 15-0. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost were $304,428 for FY 99. Hydrologic Studies were continued during FY 99 at a cost of $74,340. Total cost for collection and study of basic data in FY 99 was $378,768. 22. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN There were no PED's in progress during FY 99. 15-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal IL 2. Illinois Waterway IL and IN 4. Upper Mississippi -Illinois Navigation Study 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 7. Coralville Lake, IA 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 9. Loves Park, IL New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 2 Cost 2 Rehab: Approp. Cost Inland Waterway Trust Fund: Approp. 1 Cost 1 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. 1 Cost 2 Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 2,910,500 Cost 3,059,707 New Work: Approp. 4,000,000 Cost 2,446,151 Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: 1,065,037 709,118 Approp. 1,791,000 Cost 3,451,391 Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost 70,000 950,000 458,000 58,860 693,069 722,770 25,000 39,509 7,605,1431 7,605,1431 22,880,2482 22,869,7932 -- 126,707,7513 -- 126,706,4193 0,862,000 19,045,000 1,065,271 18,278,706 2,044,000 435,000 2,137,938 620,098 0,296,000 435,000 1,141,732 1,048,220 20,609,000 21,459,000 19,945,545 23,043,684 445,813,2374 419,958,1784 60,000 1,422,500 162,629,439 92,884 1,476,522 161,682,734 60,000 1,422,500 144,130 1,476,284 7,069,000 9,321,000 6,283,000 5,581,000 6,634,876 8,298,606 6,475,247 6,905,257 15,375,819 14,454,622 50,924,600 25,702,168 7,842,000 17,906,000 18,729,000 18,900,000 202,449,000 1,106,000 18,796,000 17,312,000 18,488,000 179.307,000 43,125 14,000 84,996 35,173 26,738 5,862 1,444,000 1,394,493 -- 30,179,4885 -- 30,173,7025 3,353,000 3,017,800 3,177,000 3,385,267 3,227,926 3,305,942 2,192,805 24,348 1,254,000 1,424,638 1,490,000 250,000 1,166,344 463,558 301,192 43,199 290,000 223,000 254,769 301,000 50,000 85,657 23,006 59,032,074 56,954,212 13,646,000 13,135,286 1,457,849 1,444,555 10,388,176 10,346,236 2,359,000 2,302,381 15-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 10. Red Rock Dam and New Work: Lake Red Rock, IA Approp. 237,000 0 30,000 40,000 13,716,000 Cost 457,085 69,372 53,269 29,407 11,051,330 Maint: Approp. 4,907,000 5,618,186 3,628,000 5,202,000 69,285,673 Cost 5,048,062 5,242,535 4,053,859 5,306,960 66,909,012 Contributed Funds: Approp. -- -- (979) -- 19,850 Cost -- -- -- -- 18,422 11. Saylorville Lake New Work: IA Approp. 20,000 100,000 (80,000) -- 128,067,887 Cost 686,151 35,596 16,627 116 127,868,138 Maint: Approp. 3,927,000 6,436,000 4,338,000 4,212,000 70,282,241 Cost 4,097,403 5,942,532 4,861,335 4,325,243 67,591,461 Contributed Funds: Approp. (3,411) -- 139,955 29,787 3,564,428 Cost -- -- 91,890 217,368 3,247,835 12. West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. 3,675,000 1,648,000 75,000 -- 12,279,000 Cost 3,731,279 1,520,161 178,360 90,479 12,284,123 Contributed Funds: Approp. 900,000 342,000 -- -- 2,021,000 Cost 624,536 473,161 6,738 53,645 1,726,623 13. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. 310,000 473,000 1,518,000 1,893,000 4,394,000 Cost 334,179 491,445 1,396,499 1,868,266 4,233,585 Contributed Funds: Approp. 100,000 215,000 88,162 345,000 748,162 Cost 65,911 222,503 -- 262,222 550,636 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 6. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 15-10 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19341 August 30, 1935 August 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Habor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 15-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1947 (Continued) July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 of Illinois Central RR bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with the Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navition project to include an adjacent downstream water area. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 15-12 H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1 st sess.4 Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. November 17, 1986 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. August 15, 1985 Provide for a 10-year environmental program to H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., (P.L. 99-88) Novemer 17, 1986 7. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 8. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to imple- GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. November 17, 1986 Defines area of work. 9. 1944 Flood Control Act 10. November 17, 1986 11. June 28, 1938 FARM CREK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. LOVES PARK, IL Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. December 19, 1985 Land Acquisition 12. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. 1st sess. Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1lst sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WEST DES MOINES, IA 13. November 17, 1986 Construct levees and floodwall. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO. 13, IA 19. November 17, 1986 Raise existing levees Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administrative Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet - Sy portion. 15-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 $ 108,7004 $201,685 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,499' 171,000 Quincy, IL, Harbor Acces Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 356,061 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 15-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 1943 $ 247,822 -- -- Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) 1962 1,679,056 -- -- Bettendorf, IA 1987 14,930,085 -- $ 228,073 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 144,910 -- -- Canton, MO' 1964 1,496,555 -- -- Clinton, IA 1991 26,237,690 -- 839,615 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,923,145 -- -- Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 68,898 -- -- Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 1969 1,492,016 -- -- Des Moines, IA 1972 4,993,224 -- 23,323 Drury Drainage District, IL 1964 1,144,875 -- -- Dubuque, IA 1974 10,861,170 -- 145,415 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 207,826 -- -- East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 -- -- East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 -- -- Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 -- -- Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 -- -- Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 -- -- Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 -- -- Farm Creek, IL 1997 9,859,020 5,057,111 -- Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 -- -- Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 ---- Galena, IL 1952 844,100 -- 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 -- -- Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 -- -- Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 -- -- Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 -- 20,626 Hannibal, MO 1993 6,060,221 -- 600,000 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 -- -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 -- -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 -- -- Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 -- -- Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 -- -- Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 -- -- Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 -- -- Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL 1 1957 123,300 -- -- Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 -- -- Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 -- -- Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 .... Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 -- -- Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 -- -- Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 -- 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 .... Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 -- 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 -- 213,554 15-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 -- -- Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 -- 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 -- -- -- Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 -- -- Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 -- -- Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 -- -- Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 -- -- Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 -- -- Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 -- -- Rockford, IL 1989 10,032,496 -- 514,188 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 -- -- Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 -- -- Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 -- -- Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 -- -- Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 -- -- Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 -- -- Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 -- -- South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 -- -- South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1991 7,066,437 -- 2,355,479 South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 -- -- South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 -- -- Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 -- -- Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 -- -- Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 -- -- Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 -- -- Waterloo, IA 1987 48,620,099 -- 83,300 Waterloo Bridges, IA 1991 1,125,000 -- 1,108,787 Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 -- -- Davenport, IA 1987 -- -- -- Moline, IL 2 1987 -- -- -- Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 -- -- Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 -- -- 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. 15-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 1986 1986 -- -- Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL 1969 1979 $76,664 -- Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 -- -- Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA 1970 1977 55,664 -- Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL 1942 1986 -- -- Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1938 1977 -- -- Henderson River, IL 1964 1977 102,310 -- Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks 1982 1981 -- -- Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) 1986 1986 -- -- Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1938 1977 -- -- Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 -- -- Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 -- -- Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA -- 1977 -- -- South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 -- William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 -- -- Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL 1989 1990 -- -- Peoria Levees, IL -- 1990 -- -- 15-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bay Island Drainage and Levee District, IL Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Des Moines County DD7, IA Des Moines County DD8, IA Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Hannibal, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Levings Lake Dam, IL Lima DD, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL October 1998 October 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 February 1999 November 1998 November 1998 October 1998 November 1998 April 1999 November 1998 May 1999 May 1999 November 1998 November 1998 October 1998 November 1998 December 1998 December 1998 November 1998 November 1998 February 1999 October 1998 November 1998 April 1999 December 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 May 1999 December 1998 December 1998 December 1998 November 1998 November 1998 October 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 October 1998 October 1998 October 1998 15-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Page Park Dam, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Rock Island Arsenal, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Savanna Ordinance Depot, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage District Union No. 1 and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL Tama, IA The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA Waterloo, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN December 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 July 1998 December 1998 October 1998 November 1997 October 1998 May 1999 November 1998 February 1999 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 March 1999 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 November 1998 December 1998 October 1998 15-20 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FISCAL YEAR COSTS Federal Cost Non-Federal Total Cedar River, Cedar River City, IA Cedar River, Plainfield, IA East Peoria, IL Liverpool, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine Oelwein, Fayette County, IA Ottawa, IL Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA Section 205 Coordination Westfork, Des Moines, Jackson, MN Volga River, Fayette, IA Snagging and Clearing (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780) DeKalb, IL Devils Creek, Lee Co, IA Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) Mahaska County Road, G71 Middle Fabius River Lewis County Road 582, MO Section 14 Coordination Account South River, Marion County Road 402, MO West Fork, Des Moines River, MN Highway 52, Bellevue, IA Des Moines River Township Road 65, MN State Route A, Scotland Co, MO Emergency Flood Control Activities (P.L. 99) Disaster Preparedness Program Emergency Operations Rehabilitation O&M Emergency Supplement $ 2,468,936 9,703 250,300 416,812 51,636 2,058,356 260,637 10,623 25,679 3 555 530,095 $2,999,031 9,703 460 250,760 59,519 476,331 51,636 136,764 2,195,120 260,637 10,623 25,679 3 555 5,556,237 726,838 33,283,075 $ 4,872 $ 4,872 1,505 1,505 $ 6,377 $ 6,377 $ 11,527 $11,527 30,054 30,054 19,730 19,730 9,459 -2,573 6,886 115,926 42,998 158,924 29,283 29,283 11,546 11,546 2,087 2.087 229,612 40,425 270,037 318,917 318,917 229,694 229,694 208,271 208,271 155,024 155,024 911,906 911,906 15-21 Project Flood Control (Section 205, P. L. 858) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills Available Lift at at Low Water Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water1 Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.22 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 -- 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with flat pools. 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. 15-22 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Lock Dam Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Peoria -- $2,733,4991 Concrete Concrete Starved Rock Concrete Marseilles Dresden Island Brandon Road Lockport Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete T.J. O'Brien Concrete and sheet piling Piles in sand Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Concrete and timber Piles in sand Movable Concrete (wicket and timber Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock type) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (Bear trap) (Bear trap) Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Piles in clay Fixed Concrete and sheet Piles in sand 1939 $ 2,744,5921 Piles in sand 1939 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 1933 1933 1933 1933 1933 Piles in clay 1960 piling 15-23 3,381,030' 885,315' 1,853,725' 2,503,3761 2,031,6831 133,608' 6,954,7001 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN (Continued) LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Lock Dam Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Lock and dam -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,250,3041 equipment Total locks -- -- -- -- -- -- $ 24,471,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. TABLE 15-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers $ 2,135,358' Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places 813,3181 Starved Rock to Lockport 6,007,335 Starved Rock to Grafton 2,917,607 Calumet-Sag Channel 19,238,200 Peoria small boat harbor 24,937' Protection piers at all locks 77,6131 Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design 5,141,474 Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration 5,466,804 Rebuild highway bridges 19,327,850 Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel 20,828,435' Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers 18,362,0411 Recreation Facilities, Code 711 445,000 Removal of Blue Island lock 288,600' Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District 1,081,600' Total additional features $100,442,142 Total existing project $124,913,974 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. 15-24 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-M EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams -- IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 -- junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL TABLE 15-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $433,620,494 $153,271,726 $707,780,968 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 -- -- 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 -- -- 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $433,622,494 $153,271,726 $713,600,6391 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 15-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 15-0 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number FISCAL YEAR COSTS Federal Cost Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (120) DesMoines & Racoon River, IA - 013490 Subtotal Special Studies (140) Peoria Riverfront Development, IL - 013410 Upper Miss. River FLD Profile Study - 013414 Illinois River Ecosystem Restoration - 014293 Rock River, IL & WI Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) Mississippi River Navigation Study - 010315 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations - 017250 Review of FERC Licenses - 053857 Interagency Water Resources Dev. - 014713 Subtotal Coordination Studies with other Agencies (180) Cooperation w/other Water Agencies - 053907 PAS IA Water Demand & Availability - 019002 PAS - IA - Black Haw Co. Hydraulic Analysis PAS - Negotiation Funds PAS-WI-Fox Lake Restoration - 055011 PAS - SAC Fox FLood Plain Map - 072001 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) 71,266 71,266 71,266 71,266 11,331 11,331 1,770,377 1,770,377 45,123 45,123 21,579 21.579 1,848,411 1,848,411 6,905,257 6,905,257 6,905,257 6,905,257 56,588 56,588 4,777 4,777 26.304 26,304 87,669 87,669 9,240 9,240 1,183 1,183 122,364 122,364 3,000 3,000 27,327 27,327 54,654 3,460 3,460 166,576 27,327 193,901 9,079,177 27,327 9,106,504 15-26 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-0 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) Item and CWIS Number FISCAL YEAR COSTS Federal Cost Non-Federal Total COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) FLoodplain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Mgmt Services - 082030 Technical Services - 082040 Quick Responses - 082045 Regulated Frequency Curve - 083157 SS Hanibal, MO - 083187 Subtotal Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrologic Studies - 053820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (NON REIMBURSABLE) 74,433 112,252 11,048 95,129 11,563 304,425 74,433 112,252 11,048 95,129 11,563 304,563 74,340 42,991 74,340 42,991 378,768 347,416 9,457,945 27,327 9,485,272 15-27 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .......... 16-3 2. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ................ 16-3 3. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP) ...................... 16-3 Flood Control 4. Aitkin County, CSAH 10, MN .......... 16-4 5. Bassett Creek, MN .................. 16-5 6. Chaska, MN ....................... 16-5 7. Grand Forks, ND - East Grand Forks, MN 16-6 8. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ........... .16-6 9. Houston, MN ....................... 16-7 10. LaFarge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI ................... 16-7 11. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND ................. 16-8 12. LeSueur River, CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN ....................... 16-8 13. Marshall, MN ...................... 16-9 14. Portage, WI ....................... 16-10 15. Rochester,MN .................... 16-10 16. Sheyenne River, ND ................ 16-10 17. Souris River Basin, ND .............. 16-11 18. St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN ........ 16-12 19. St.Paul,MN ...................... 16-12 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 16-13 Miscellaneous Page 21. Other Work Under Special Authority ... 16-13 22. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC & CE) ............. 16-13 23. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ........ 16-13 24. Regulatory Functions Program ........ 16-13 General Investigations 25. 26. 27. Surveys .......................... Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... Advance Engineering and Design ...... 16-13 16-13 16-13 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement . 16-14 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation ..... .16-18 Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. 16-21 Table 16-D Not Applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... .16-22 Table 16-F Not Applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects ....... .16-26 Table 16-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River........... 16-27 Table 16-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan................ 16-28 Table 16-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....... .16-29 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Page Tables (cont.) Table 16-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....... .16-30 Table 16-L Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment .............. 16-31 Page Table 16-M Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration ............... 16-31 Table 16-N General Investigations ....... .16-31 16-2 Tables (cont.) ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Terminal facilities. None. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See Table 16-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation.) The Pine River Dam main embankment consists of a timber diaphragm core and earth fill. The Pine River Dam control structure is made of reinforced concrete with a wooden sheet pile cutoff and is supported on a timber substructure. The recommended plan for improvements to the Pine River Dam for dam safety assurance includes: rehabilitation of the existing structure to include 13 new gates, concrete replacement and a sheetpile and concrete wall along the current main dam embankment, and improvements to the perimeter dikes. Estimated cost (1999) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work at the Pine River Dam is $10,200,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, reports and data collection cost $3,192,401. Dam Safety: Engineering and design and the start of construction for dam safety modifications at Pine River Dam cost $1,477,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See Table 16-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) Pine River Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Construction of dam safety modifications is currently underway. 3. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP) Location. The program is authorized for the commercially navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi River System. In the St. Paul District, this includes the Mississippi, Minnesota, Black, and St. Croix Rivers in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. It is intended to protect and/or enhance the river resources and guide future river management. The primary emphasis of the program is on habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects. Long term resource monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized, was a study of the economic impacts of recreation (completed), navigation traffic monitoring (continuing 16-3 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 under other authority), and recreation projects (unfunded). The program was initiated by WRDA in FY 1986 and is authorized to continue through FY 2002. The 1999 WRDA authorization extends the EMP beyond FY 2002 on a continuing basis. The execution of the program is being closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the three affected states in the St. Paul District. See Rock Island District Tables 15-A and 15-B for total program costs and authorizing legislation. In the St. Paul District, nineteen habitat projects have been completed. These are the Guttenberg Waterfowl Ponds (IA), Island 42 (MN), Lake Onalaska (WI), Blackhawk Park (WI), Pool 8 Islands Phases I and II (WI), Indian Slough (WI), Finger Lakes (MN), Lansing Big Lake (IA), Cold Springs (WI), Pool 9 Island (WI), Spring Lake Peninsula (WI), Bussey Lake (IA), Peterson Lake (MN), Polander Lake Stage I (MN), East Channel (WI/MN) Rice Lake (MN), Small Scale Drawdown (WI) and Trempealeau (WI). The projects are being operated and maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, except for Blackhawk Park which is maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Through FY 1999, funds expended by the St. Paul District have amounted to $31,748,000 for planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects; $866,000 for long term resource monitoring; $768,000 for economic impacts of recreation study; and $1,905,000 for program management. The allocations for the overall program projected over a 15-year period for the St. Paul District are almost $50 million. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects of features not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, as specified in Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and results during fiscal year. In the St. Paul District, costs during the year totaled $2,507,834 Federal. The majority of funds were expended on the planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat projects. Design was continued on six projects. Construction was initiated on two projects and continued on four. Construction was completed on two projects and contract award was made for construction of one project. Flood Control 4. AITKIN COUNTY, CSAH 10, MINNESOTA Location. Along the west bank of the Mississippi River adjacent to County State Aid Highway 10 (CSAH 10), Aitkin County, about 155 miles north of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing Project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Mississippi River involves approximately 550 feet of riverbank. The project consists of rockfill toe protection and associated earthwork to protect CSAH 10. The project was approved by the Mississippi River Division for construction on 10 May 1999, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. A project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and Aitkin County on 9 July 1999. The agreement requires the county to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of 16-4 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded on 13 August 1999 and construction was initiated. Total FY 99 Federal costs were $148,059 and non-Federal, $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the emergency streambank protection project is underway. 5. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound flood waters and a new tunnel (part of which was constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the project are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas (LERRD) are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project financial closeout work continues. New Work: Construction on the final stage of work was completed in FY 98. Total Federal costs were $2,237 and non- Federal, $31,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has been completed on all components. The project financial closeout work is currently underway. 6. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 1.0 mile of diversion channel on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $30,397,000 and $12,558,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Stage 3 construction is substantially complete. Stage 3A construction (final stage) is complete. Total Federal costs were $185,712 and non-Federal, $27,152. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. A project dedication was held on July 28, 1998. 7. GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA AND EAST GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA Location. Grand Forks, North Dakota is located in Grand Forks County in eastern North Dakota about 70 miles south of the Canadian border. East Grand Forks, Minnesota is located at the outlet of the Red Lake River to the Red River of the North, immediately across the river from Grand Forks. (For General Location see Geological Survey map of either North Dakota or Minnesota.) Existing project. Project was authorized by P.L. 105-277, Omnibus Appropriation Bill FY 99. Estimated cost (1998) of the entire flood damage reduction project is $322,068,000, total cost to the United States is estimated at $161,733,000 and total cost to the non- Federal sponsors (cities of Grand Forks and East Grand Forks) is estimated at $160,335,000. The flood damage reduction project consists of a flood barrier around both communities providing protection against a flood equivalent to the peak discharge that occurred during the devastating flood of 1997 (136,900 cubic feet per second). A secondary purpose of recreation is also included in the authorized project. Local cooperation. Negotiation of a draft Project Cooperation Agreement was initiated in 1999. The non- Federal sponsors will comply with the local cost share requirements of Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering associated with pre-engineering and design was accomplished at a cost of $2,038,518. Condition at end of fiscal year. The General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement formulating and identifying the selected flood damage reduction plan for these communities was completed in November 1998. The Chief of Engineers Report was signed on Dec. 29, 1998, and the Record of Decision was signed on Feb. 17, 1999. Cultural and historical survey work was performed to identify potential project impacts. Design memorandum addressing the flood barrier alignment and interior flood control designs were initiated. Negotiations were begun on the draft Project Cooperation Agreement. 8. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions is taking place under the authority contained in Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Latest published maps is in project document. A reconnaissance report was completed in 1994 under the Dam Safety Assurance Program. The report recommended adding a new spillway to increase the dam's discharge capacity to the Probable Maximum flood level. Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $14,600,000 and $100,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department has 16-6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for the environmental improvement to the project. According to current Dam Safety cost sharing guidance, the local sponsors are required to fund 15 percent of the dam safety improvement costs in the same proportion as the original construction was cost shared. The local sponsors would therefore pay for 4.5 percent of 15 percent or 0.68 percent of the dam safety costs. The North Dakota Office of the State Engineer has supported the proposed modifications identified in the Reconnaissance Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated, maintained, inspected and evaluations were performed at a cost of $125,971. Dam Safety: Engineering and design cost $601,292, all Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. Construction of a habitat improvement project (under Section 1135 authority) was completed and the project was turned over to the local sponsor, the North Dakota Fish and Game Department. Homme Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Engineering and design of dam safety modifications is underway. 9. HOUSTON, MN Location. The project is located in the city of Houston, in Houston County, in southeastern Minnesota. The city of Houston is adjacent to the Root River, which is a tributary to the Mississippi River. The city is bounded by floodplain agricultural land to the west and east, and by steep bluffs to the south and by the Root River to the north. Existing project. The flood control project is designed to provide protection to the city of Houston against the 100-year flood on the Root River. There are currently two levee systems in the vicinity of Houston; neither of which provides adequate protection against the 100-year flood. Proposed measures to provide 100-year flood protection to the city of Houston include: A levee system, two full-height road raises; and a sandbag closure. To ease the constriction at the Hwy 76 bridge, an existing portion of the MnDOT levee will be removed, and a high-flow channel will be constructed on the north bank of the Root River. The project also includes construction of two ponding areas to supplement existing interior ponding, three interior gravity outlets, one exterior gravity outlet and a ditch constructed between the levee and the Root River to carry gravity flow from outlet A-1. The project was approved for construction under Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (PL 99-662), as amended; and is also authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; and Section 4 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1995 for requirements. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Houston on Feb. 15, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completed work includes the construction of a high-flow channel in the Root River; substantial completion of the levee upstream of the Hwy 76 bridge, including the US Hwy 16 and CSAH 13 road raises; partial completion of ponding area A-1, and substantial completion of the interior drainage outlet ditch to the Root River. Federal costs were $11,735 and non-Federal $210,071. Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage 2A (ponding area) construction is complete. Stage 1 (channel work) construction is complete. Stage 2B (levees) construction is complete. 10. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996 for flood control dam and impoundment project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA 96) authorized a modification to the original project to include transfer of approximately 8,569 acres of project lands to the State of Wisconsin and the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Ho-Chunk Nation. The Ho-Chunk Nation is to receive up to 1,200 acres of lands that are of cultural and religious significance. The modification also includes deauthorizing the construction of the reservoir and dam, while completing other features of the original project. Estimated Federal cost for work authorized by WRDA 96 is $17,000,000. Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. A Project Cooperation Agreement is not required for the land transfer. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $49,278. New Work: Work associated with WRDA 96 project was accomplished at a cost of $955,951. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Annual Report for 1996 for status of work authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. The project was specifically deauthorized by Section 361(b)(7) of Public Law 104-303, October 12, 1996, with the exception of named relocation and restoration features that remain authorized. 11. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for Major Rehabilitation is $7,650,000. Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $14,700,000 and $260,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. Complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: Engineering and design on Stage 4 replacement of permanent operation equipment was completed and construction was initiated. Total Federal costs were $1,627,623. Dam Safety: Stage 2 construction contract was closed out. Total Federal costs were $232,025 and non-Federal costs, $0. Maintenance: Project was operated, maintained, inspected, investigated, monitored and evaluations were performed at a cost of $1,039,495. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity deficiency. Construction of dam safety and major rehabilitation modifications is currently underway. This work is being accomplished in five stages. In July 1994, the first stage of construction of the dam safety and major rehabilitation modifications was started. Stage 1 was completed in June 1995. Stage 2 was completed in September 1997. Stage 3 was completed in June 1997. 12. LE SUEUR RIVER, CSAH 28, BLUE EARTH COUNTY, MN Location. Along the right bank of the Le Sueur River, Blue Earth County, abut 90 miles southwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. 16-8 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Le Sueur River involves approximately 570 feet of riverbank at two locations of 440 feet and 130 feet. The project consists of rockfill toe protection and associated earthwork to protect County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 28. The project was approved by the Mississippi River Division for construction on Sept. 7, 1999, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and Blue Earth County on Sep. 13, 1999. The agreement requires the county to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities (other that those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it own or controls for access to the project for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replace the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded on Sep. 17, 1999 and construction was initiated. Total FY 99 Federal Costs were $179,560 and non-Federal $2,752. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the emergency streambank protection project is underway. 13. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Section 401(a) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676. Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1999) for new work is $8,010,000 and $2,890,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on Dec. 23, 1963. 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 9, 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage 2 (final stage) construction was initiated. Federal costs were $2,495,982, Non-Federal $186,216. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. The first stage of construction for new work is complete. The final stage of construction is 50% complete. 14. PORTAGE, WI Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing project. The recommended plan provides for improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 1.2 miles of existing levee improvement; 1.6 miles of new levee; one highway and one railroad closure; cultural mitigation; and recreation features. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 100 years. Estimated Federal cost (1999) for new work is $9,066,000 and $2,510,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement between the city of Portage and the Federal Government was executed in October 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract which was awarded in July 1997 continued. Federal costs were $2,128,673, Non-Federal $64,393. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for minor punch list items. 15. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 5.7 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.7 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, three drop structures, 1.3 miles of levee, and 6.5 miles of hiking and biking trails and nonstructural features. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed Aug. 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on project closeout activities. Total Federal costs were $195,687 and non-Federal costs were $4,913. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. Project has been transferred to the local sponsor. 16. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion 16-10 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non- Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (1999) to the United States for new work is $30,130,000 and $12,430,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of three separable components each requiring a local cooperation agreement. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District is the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West Fargo unit on Mar. 6, 1990. The Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District was formed to serve as the sponsor for the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit. The Maple River Reservoir Unit was deleted from the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued on Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise component. Flood damage repair continued on the West Fargo and Horace components. Total Federal costs were $1,267,444 and non-Federal costs $166,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of both the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are essentially complete. Both of these units were operated during the spring and summer floods of 1993 and the spring floods in 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 and performed very well although some erosion damage was sustained on both projects. Evaluation of real estate needs, design of the structural modifications and coordination with the Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District for the raise of the flood pool at Baldhill Dam, was completed. Preparation of the plans and specifications for Stage 1, Gate Modifications, was initiated. The Maple River Reservoir unit has been deleted from the project due to lack of economic justification. 17. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geolgical Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the one-time purchase of 377,800 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation of these dams with the existing Boundary Dam and Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97-88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) was deauthorized Mar. 10, 1995, with the completion of the structures in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a flood warning system for Minot; levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341, and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $109,260,000 and $8,180,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed on the final stage of work at Lake Darling Dam. Total costs, all Federal, were $193,572. Maintenance: Total cost was $303,774. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva, Sawyer, Renville County Park and Burlington to Minot Stages 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Construction at Rafferty Dam and Alameda Dam is complete. Construction on rural improvements Stage 1 and Stage 2, road raises and acquisitions, is complete. Construction on improvements to Fish and Wildlife Service refuge dams is complete. Lake Darling Dam construction is complete. The project dedication ceremony was held on May 27, 1998. 18. ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN Location. In Washington County in eastern Minnesota along the St. Croix River about 18 miles northeast of St. Paul, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota). Existing project. The proposed plan provides for repair of the existing 1000-foot retaining wall system, construction of a 1300-foot extension to the wall and expansion of the wall system to include a new secondary landward seepage wall to aid in flood protection for the downtown area. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $8,700,000 and $2,900,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580) as amended by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Stillwater, Minnesota on Apr. 22, 1996 which covered Stage I of the project. An amendment to the Project Cooperation Agreement to encompass Stage II was executed on September 29, 1998. An amendment to encompass Stage III will be negotiated and executed if warranted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage IIs (surcharging at Mulberry Point) was completed. Engineering and design of Stage II was completted. Total costs were $1,169,570 Federal, and $85,021 non-Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Stage IIs (surcharging at Mulberry Point) was completed Jun 1999. Preparation of plans and specifications of the extension of the retaining wall to the north, State II is complete. A construction contract for Stage II was awarded Jun. 30, 1999. The State III economic feasibility study continues. 19. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing project. Since completion of the St. Paul and South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed on Aug. 22, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completion of the Operation and Maintenance manuals and other project close out activities. Total Federal costs were $2,297. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 16-12 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See Table 16-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $120,450. Total cost to Sep. 30, 1999 is $2,098,283. Miscellaneous 21. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Sign Standards Programs (as described in Chap. 6, ER 1130-2-500) there were costs of $31,810. 22. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation and Inspection Program Advanced Measures Total FC & CE $ 387,933 480,395 53,340 11,589,940 $12,511,608 23. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Local Mobilization Preparedness $ 491 National Mobilization 29,776 Emergency Operations Center Support 19,206 Catastrophic Disaster Training 4.846 Total NEPP $54,319 24. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Environmental Impact Statements Total Regulatory $2,955,248 710,530 643,306 $4,309,084 General Investigations 25. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $742,009 which included one special studies, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 26. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $310,861 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain Management services and hydrologic studies. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 27. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $2,556,983 which included two local protection projects. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 2. Reservoirs at Headquarters of Mississippi River, MN 4. Aitkin County, CSAH 10, MN (Contributed Funds) 5. Bassett Creek, MN (Contributed Funds) 6. Chaska, MN (Contributed Funds) 7. Grand Forks, ND - New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: East Grand Forks, MN Approp. Cost 8. Homme Lake and Dam, ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost -- -- -- -- 4,398,628 -- -- -- -- 4,398,6281 3,089,500 2,635,416 3,011,447 3,139,000 55,593,023 3,095,096 2,658,766 2,971,844 3,192,401 55,475,3202 -- -- -- -- 425,000 -- -- -- -- 425,000 340,000 833,000 540,000 1,603,000 3,616,000 625,346 754,546 612,495 1,477,300 3,482,588 15,000 10,039 199,000 214,000 148,059 158,098 84,500 0 248,428 25,000 50,000 80,000 64,795 50,000 44,400 3,537,000 3,066,000 4,043,260 2,916,251 10,426 -125,000 30,063 475,000 470,146 400,000 185,000 15,000 355,261 208,116 187,997 84,500 0 -- 29,419,000 2,237 29,415,8213 20,000 2,196,191 31,000 2,190,737 35,000 31,174,000 185,712 31,160,7404 10,000 4,305,000 27,152 4,300,887 -- 500,000 3,747,000 2,195,000 6,442,000 -- 211,192 4,926,288 2,038,518 6,175,998 338,500 177,000 118,000 336,860 176,325 121,234 571,000 1,419,097 601,292 1,419,0975 126,000 4,208,056 125,971 4,206,798 16-14 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 (Contributed Funds) 1135 authority 9. Houston, MN (Contributed Funds) 10. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 11. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Le Sueur River, CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost -- 7,453 -- 7,453 500,000 371,000 508,798 259,984 40,000 115,573 586,400 2,229,600 153,200 545,566 1,323,627 1,099,180 155,000 109,024 86,000 420,000 88,946 343,341 571,000 1,782,000 601,292 1,776,312 -- 5,018,968 11,735 5,015,4866 100,800 761,800 210,071 751,382 94,000 670,000 2,516,000 21,922,000 91,637 241,024 955,951 19,930,612 41,000 122,000 41,188 122,095 96,000 95,493 48,000 910,457 49,278 910,246 -- -- -- 3,325,638 -- -- -- 3,325,638 1,158,000 936,000 1,110,000 1,028,000 24,790,531 1,141,641 928,263 1,122,258 1,039,495 25,813,516 -- -- -- -- 208,000 -- -- -- -- 208,000 1,243,000 331,000 643,000 1,520,000 6,855,000 1,711,516 334,098 524,708 1,627,623 6,825,945 376,000 2,837,000 270,000 3,836,569 2,798,322 291,562 85,000 81,000 18,000 22,000 -- 30,000 -- 5,000 20,000 20,000 32,000 45,395 264,000 14,465,000 232,025 14,404,380 -- 243,000 -- 242,000 168,000 230,000 179,560 229,955 -- 114,000 114,000 -- 2,752 2,752 16-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 13. Marshall, MN (Contributed Funds) 14. Portage, WI (Contributed Funds) 15. Rochester, MN (Contributed Funds) 16. Sheyenne River, ND (Contributed Funds) Horace to W. Fargo (Contributed Funds) W. Fargo 17. Souris River Basin, ND (Contributed Funds) 18. St. Croix River Stillwater, MN New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 850,000 379,000 470,000 2,445,000 5,119,000 190,035 1,035,577 408,816 2,495,982 5,103,622' -- 510,000 175,000 -- 300,000 243,000 70,000 755,000 186,216 729,216 174,000 889,000 3,909,000 2,095,000 8,986,000 159,141 896,555 3,867,502 2,128,673 8,967,813 -- 400,000 350,000 -- 101,690 585,386 -877,000 680,130 -581 14,656 40,000 40,266 0 48,610 20,000 34,034 770,000 1,520,000 64,393 748,469 182,000 68,429,549 195,687 68,424,9998 -- 6,829,206 4,913 6,646,087 860,000 493,000 720,000 2,133,000 25,505,000 932,440 483,941 666,630 1,267,444 24,574,2349 5,000 10,000 15,000 -2,245,000 1,953,000 650,000 4,940,269 1,692,829 772,630 -- 430,000 -- 424,318 136,000 1,196,000 166,000 1,178,190 50,000 102,195,000 193,572102,174,03210 112,000 337,000 280,000 268,000 1,343,000 110,884 329,379 251,636 303,774 1,340,714 -- 473,000 1,157,838 853,188 779,000 54,673 -- 5,698,858 -- 5,679,113 860,000 4,512,000 1,169,570 4,010,296 16-16 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Horace to W. Fargo Contrib. 200,000 500,000 -- 50,000 750,000 Cost -- 358,025 177,646 85,021 620,692 19. St. Paul, MN New Work: Arpprop. -- 210,000 10,000 -- 13,254,000 Cost 92,868 208,096 8,368 2,297 13,2514,81911 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 125,000 -- -- -- 4,024,000 Cost 139,479 -- -- -- 3,986,877 1. Includes $681,805 for new work for previous project. 2. Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 3. Excludes $1,034,561 in other contributed funds that have been expended for betterments. 4. Excludes $744,114 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 5. Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. Includes $23,000 expended during FY91-FY95 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. 6. Excludes $249,964 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. 7. Excludes $1,802,866 for previous project. Includes $372,000 CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 85 which remains excluded from the project cost estimate. 8. $787,042 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments and $4,198,445 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. 9. Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 16-G). Excludes $475,000 for costs associated with inactive Maple River unit. 10. Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam unit (see Table 16-E). 11. Excludes $383,048 in other contributed funds that have been expended for betterments. 16-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. March 3, 1899 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 June 26, 19342 4. July 24, 1946 May 10, 1999 5. October 22, 1976 6. October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 7. October 21, 1998 8. December 22, 1944 November 17, 1986 9. November 17, 1986 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915). Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. AITKIN COUNTY, CSAH 10, MN BASSETT CREEK, MN CHASKA, MN Cost Sharing provisions GRAND FORKS, ND AND EAST GRAND FORKS, MN HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Authorized as Park River Reservoir Redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam Cong. 2d sess.) Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions HOUSTON, MN June 30, 1948 November 17, 1988 H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., 1 sess.' Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended 1976 WRDA Public Law 94-587 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act -- Public Law 99-98 1976 WRDA-- Public Law 94-587 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662 Public law 105-277, OMNIBUS Appropriation Bill, FY 99 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78 th Cong., 2d sess.) Public Law 435 (80th Sec 1135 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662 Sec 401 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662, as amended Sec 205 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended See 4 WRDA 1988, as amended 16-18 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. October 23, 1962 October 12, 1996 11. December 22, 1944 12. July 24, 1946 September 7, 1999 13. November 17, 1986 LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Flood control dam and impoundment project Modification to original project to include transfer of approximately 8,569 acres of project lands to the State of Wisconsin and the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Ho-Chunk Nation. Modification also includes deauthorizing the construction of the reservoir and dam, while completing other features of the original project. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM LESUEUR RIVER, CSAH 28, BLUE EARTH COUNTY, MN MARSHALL, MN November 17, 1988 14. November 17, 1986 15. November 17, 1986 PORTAGE, WI ROCHESTER, MN October 31, 1992 16. November 17, 1986 17. November 17, 1986 18. October 12, 1996 SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Project shall include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection Maple River. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Consists of two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as Rafferty and Alameda projects); a flood warning system for Minot; Levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing in the basin and Purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modificantions to Dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN 1962 Flood Control Act WRDA 1996 Flood Control Act 1944 Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662, Sec 401 (a) WRDA 1988- Public Law 100-676 WRDA 1986-Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1992- Sec 102, Public Law 102-580 WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1986-Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1996 (Public Law 104-303) Sec 363, WRDA 1992 16-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. November 17, 1986 ST. PAUL, MN WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1990- Public Law 101-640 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 16-20 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 -- Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3,4 1921 92 -- Minnesota River, MN Completed 1996 2,057,7228 396,960 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerds 1925 47,794 3,891 and Grand Rapids, MN Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed 3 1923 9,070 -- Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1991 150,410 1,185,011 Warroad Harbor and River, MN Completed 1996 86,105 2,200,715 Wisconsin River, WI 2,3 1888 -- -- Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive 1928 27,941 11,139 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN Completed 1996 515,000 63,941 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Existing channel adequate for commerce (see Table 16-G for deauthorized portion of project.) Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin River, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2nd sess.) Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. No commerce reported. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.) Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc., 69th Cong., 1st sess.) Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. 16-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Big Fork River, MN2 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing City, MN3 Black River at North Bend, WI2 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND2 Cannon River at Faribault, MN2 Cochrane Drainage Ditch, WI Devils Lake, ND3 Dry Run, IA Eau Galle River, WI Elk River, MN Emerson Manitoba-Noyes, MN3 Enderlin, Maple River, ND3 Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN3 Grafton Pumping Station, ND2 Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN2 Guttenberg, IA Hanover, Hennepin County, MN 2 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI2 Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI2 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI2 Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN2 Lake Darling Dam, ND Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN3 Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN Lost River, MN Lower Branch Rush River, ND 3 Mahnomen, Wild Rice River, MN2 Mankato and North Mankato, MN Mankato Township, MN9 Melrose, WI2 Middle River at Argyle, MN3 Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN2 Minnesota River at Henderson, MN 3 Minnesota River at LeSueur,MN 2 Minneota, MN3 Minot, ND Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Pembina River, ND Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI2 Plum Creek, New Haven Township, MN 4 Prairie du Chien, WI $5,351,050 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Actives Completed Completed Completed 1998 1996 1988 1985 1991 1992 1966 1996 1970 1992 1990 1997 1990 1992 1974 1988 1984 1986 1987 1996 1989 1987 1991 1996 1967 1974 1997 1998 1998 1993 1995 1997 1986 1963 1983 1957 1983 1989 1991 $294,5666 $12,174,6001 471,000 74,500 58,500 62,5857 37,182 2,732,000 1,790,7598 9,039,250 259,7009 343,00010 4,000,00011 2,351,55312 92,86513 242,00014 2,361,915 259,500 189,600 158,500 33,000 964,873 61,326" 4,919,00016 1,353,47817 1,339,727 517,51918 1,000,0001 9 85,400 97,008,90520 215,20021 219,60022 2,360,000 261,00023 1,969,80024 250,00025 161,545 21,479,50026 1,675,835 62,76227 31,100 3,529,000 -- -- - 12, 844,062 -- -- -- -- -- -- 16-22 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN Completed 1991 311,00028 -- Red Lake River at Huot, MN2 Completed 1984 64,500 -- Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN2 Completed 1984 131,000 -- Red Lake River, MN including Completed 1996 3,120,07929 2,929,823 Clearwater River, MN Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN2 Completed 1997 166,40030 -- Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN2 Completed 1993 151,66531 -- Red River of the North Completed 1990 1,534,000 -- at Argusville, ND3 Red River of the North Completed 1990 85,66532 at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North Completed -- 27,500-- at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN SD, & ND Completed 1997 8,322,11233 11,545,052 Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN4 Completed 1992 226,50034 -- Red River of the North at Halstad, MN 3 Completed 1986 2,012,000 -- Red River of the North at Oslo, MN3 Completed 1984 1,960,200 -- Red River of the North at Pembina, ND3 Completed 1979 2,000,000 -- Redwood River below Marshall, MN3 Completed 1960 202,400 -- Root River at Hokah, MN2 Completed 1992 239,62735 -- Roseau River, MN Completed 1996 2,341,00036 -- Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 -- Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI3 Completed 1998 1,441,50037 -- Shepard Road, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 250,00038 -- St. Paul, MN2 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND2 Completed 1988 111,000 -- Snake River, Alarado, MN3 Completed 1997 1,761,00039 Sogn, MN Completed 1996 47,40040 -- Souris River, Velva, ND2 Completed 1988 137,500 -- State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI Completed 1996 21,435,00041 21,551,740 Sterling Center, MN 2 Completed 1997 160,90042 St. Hilaire, MN Completed 1996 141,10043 -- St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,01244 -- Twin Valley Lake, MN Inactive 1988 2,115,700 -- Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 -- Velva, ND3 Completed 1970 334,628 -- Vermillion River, Hastings, MN3 Completed 1980 999,900 -- Veteran's Memorial Levee, Completed 1985 182,000 -- Mississippi River, Hastings, MN2 Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN2 Completed 1995 273,00045 -- Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN2 Completed 1993 113,70046 -- Warner Road, Mississippi River, Completed 1987 250,000 -- St. Paul, MN2 Warner Road, Sibley Street, Completed 1992 500,00047 Mississippi River, St. Paul MN Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN3 Completed 1997 383,30048 16-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30. 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN2 Completed 1986 58,500 -- Wild Rice River, Mahnomen, MN4 Completed -- 86,568 -- Wild Rice River, South Branch and Completed 1989 5,620,700 -- Felton Ditch, MN Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,13149 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN2 Completed 1992 34,500so50 -- Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 -- Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN2 Completed 1990 141,4405 -- 1. Excludes $152,492 contributed funds. In addition, $487,491 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 3. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 4. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 5. Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. 6. Excludes $56,453 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $18,362 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 9. In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 10. Excludes $201,544 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $150,191 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $12,749 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $77,290 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. 16. Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project. 17. Excludes $74,225 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 16-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $79,749 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $91,218 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $59,855 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $68,421 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $307,239 contributed funds. 25. Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 26. Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 27. Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 28. Excludes $92,402 contributed funds. 29. Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 30. Excludes $33,000 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $35,430 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 16-24 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS 33. Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorehead, $27,700; which Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under government contract paid for by local interests. Includes $184,352 expended on Orewll Lake between FY91 - FY96 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. Excludes $64,775 contributed funds under Section 1135, PL 99-662 authority. 34. Excludes $61,895 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $67,014 contributed funds. 36. Excludes $65,902 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $175,357 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. 40. Excludes $5,253 contributed funds. 41. Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 16-E) and $4,175,632 contributed funds. 42. Excludes $39,815 contributed funds. 43. Excludes $31,064 contributed funds. 44. Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 45. Excludes $73,619 contributed funds. 46. Excludes $37,631 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $184,709 contributed funds. 48. Excludes $97,800 contributed funds. 49. Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 50. Excludes $11,066 contributed funds. 51. Excludes $38,173 contributed funds. 16-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI1 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND 1983 Mar. 10, 1995 $5,568,6002 -- Grafton, ND 1983 Nov. 18, 1991 -- -- Hudson Harbor, WI3 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 -- -- Kindred Lake, ND4 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 1,150,000 -- La Crosse, WI5 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 -- -- Lake Darling Dam, ND 1987 Sep. 13, 1994 4,919,0006 -- Maple River, ND7 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241 -- Moorhead, MN7 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 -- Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000 -- Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 -- Sheyenne River, ND7 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 -- State Road and Ebner Coulees 1981 Jul. 9, 1995 225,000 -- (Ebner Coulee Unit) Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 23,695 -- Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 -- Warroad Harbor and River, MN8 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- 1. Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of the project). 2. Advance engineering and design costs only. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 3. Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 4. Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 23 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 5. Authorized for further study by a House Committee on Public Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 6. Advance engineering and design costs only. (See Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 7. Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 20 in text and Table 16-I for costs for active units of project). 8. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of project). 16-26 TABLE 16-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Watershed Area (Square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages Outlet St. Paul (Square Original Stage Total Reservoir (feet)1 River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Leech Lake 0 Pokegama 6 Sandy Lake 7 Pine River 9 Gulf Lake 5 Mississippi 408 Leech 410 Mississippi 344 Sandy 267 Pine 199 Gull 168 1442 1163 6602 421 562 287 117 173 24 8 18 20 Surveys and flowage rights Recreational facilities Total new work Total operating and care Permanent indefinite appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation Total 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,830 256,185 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 20.5 70,820 -- -- 1913 86,826 86,826 -- -- -- -- 160,939 160,939 -- -- -- -- 2,834,838 2,834,838 -- -- 681,805 -- 3,716,823 4,398,628 -- -- 100,857 -- 54,407,266 54,508,123 -- -- -- -- 967,197 967,197 2,152,840 -- $782,662 -- 425,000 425,000 -- $57,810,481 $60,298,948 1. Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2. Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. ON kJ 0 d, REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN Cost to Total Sep. 30, Estimated State Type 1999 Federal Cost Orwell River (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and flooodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,2002 17,500,0003 pumping plants Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,9004 Total Cost to Date $8,060,8485 Total Estimate Cost $23,862,7006 1. Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2. Excludes cost for current planning, engineering and design work. See Table 16-M for current year costs associated with this work. 3. The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988; the project was reactivated in June 1997. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. A new flood control plan and cost estimate for a combined Grand Forks-East Grand Forks project are being developed. 4. Includes $67,900 for lands. 5. Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge deferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 6. The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 16-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 16-28 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) Project Date Inspected Black River - Irving Township - Jackson County, WI ......... ........................... September 1999 Black River at North Bend, WI .................................................... September 1999 Cannon River at Faribault, MN ........................................................ September 1999 Dry Run, Decorah, IA ........................................................ .. September 1999 Elk River, MN .................................................................. September 1999 Guttenberg, IA ........... .................................................. September 1999 Hanover, Hennepin County, MN ................................................. .September 1999 Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN ................................................. September 1999 Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI .................................... September 1999 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI .......... ........................................ September 1999 Lake Pulaski, Wright Co., MN .......... .......................................... September 1999 Mankato - North Mankato, MN .................................................... September 1999 Melrose, WI..............................................................September 1999 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN .................................................. September 1999 Minnesota River at North Mankato, MN ......... .................................... September 1999 Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN ............................................ September 1999 Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI .......... ........................................... September 1999 Plume Creek, New Haven Township, MN ............................................ September 1999 Prairie du Chein, WI ......................................................... .. September 1999 Root River at Hokah, MN ..................................................... .. September 1999 Rushford, M N ....... ....................................................... September 1999 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ........................................ September 1999 South Bend Township - Lehillier, MN ................................................ September 1999 State Road & Ebner Coulee, WI ................................................... September 1999 Sterling Center, Maple River, MN .................................................. September 1999 Trempealeau River - Arcadia ........ ............................................ September 1999 Upper Iowa River, IA ........................................................ .. September 1999 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN ................................................... September 1999 Veterans Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN ............................... September 1999 Warner Road at Sibley Street, St. Paul, MN ............................................ September 1999 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ......................................... September 1999 Winona, MN ... ........................................................... September 1999 Zumbro River, MN ............................................................... September 1999 Zumbro River at Geno, MN ..................................................... September 1999 Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN ............................................ September 1999 Zumbro River at Wabasha County - Hammond ......................................... September 1999 16-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Bois de Sioux River, Richland County, ND ............................................. $49,445 Chippewa River at Montevideo, MN .......... ........................................ 1,547 City of Houston ..................................................................... 11,735 Cottonwood River, Springfield, MN ......... ........................................... 10,532 Granite Falls, MN...................................................................150,302 Lac Qui Parle River, Dawson, MN ......... ......................................... 148,904 Minnewaukan, ND ........... ................................................... .. 5,573 Ottertail River, Breckenridge, MN ......... .......................................... 198,424 Pembina River, Neche, ND ......... ................................................ 45,611 Red River of the North, Oakport, MN ........ ........................................ 112,982 Section 205 Coordination ............................................................ 30,947 W ahpeton, ND ..... ................................. ........... ............... 159,026 Wild Rice, and Marsh Rivers, Ada, MN ......... ........................................ 57,433 Wild Rice, Marsh Rivers, MN .......... .............................................. 43,707 Zumbro River, Pine Island, MN ......... ............................................. 18,362 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Aitkin County State Aid, Hwy 10, MN ......... ....................................... $148,059 Fargo Public Facilities, ND .......... ............................................... 114,494 Lake St. Croix Beach Public Facilities, MN ......... ...................................... 18,136 LeSueur River CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN ........................................ 179,560 Minnesota Highway 169, Mankato, MN ........ ......................................... 20,451 Minnesota River, Shakopee, MN ......... .............................................. 1,795 Red Lake River, Fisher, Polk County, MN ................................................ 2,964 Red River of the North, Drayton, ND ......... ........................................... 1,400 Section 14 Coordination ............................................................. 12,904 State Hwy 7 Bridge, Pomme de Terre River, MN ........ .................................. 35,085 16-30 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Coordination account funds ......................................................... $ 12,293 Initial appraisals, general .......... ................................................. 13,098 Lac Qui Parle Clay Banks, MN ... .......................................... .......... 160 TABLE 16-M AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Restorations of Aquatic Ecosystems pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303 Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Baraboo River Aquatic Restoration .......... ........................................... $5,006 Coordination account funds ............. .............................................. 7,916 Paint Creek, Allamakee County, IA ......... ............................................ 6,476 Preliminary restoration plans ........... .............................................. 31,820 Red River of the North Fishways, ND & MN ........ .................................... 24,185 TABLE 16-N GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 27, 28, and 29 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Special Studies Devils Lake, ND ................................................................ $230,118 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations .......... .............................................. .. 79,584 FERC Licensing Activities ........... ........................................... 6,590 Inter Agency Water Resources Development ......................................... .62,619 North American Waterfowl Management Plan ........ ................................. 2,381 Coordination with Other Agencies Cooperation with Other Water Resource Agencies ....... .............................. 11,298 Planning Assistance to States1: Minnesota .......................... 267,790 Wisconsin ................. ......... 81,629 TOTAL SURVEYS................... . $ 604,638 16-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 16-N GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (See Sections 35, 36, and 37 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International Water Studies ................... .................................. $ 72,6042 International Joint Commission, Red River of the North .................................. 670,208 Flood Plain Management Services Unit .......... .................................... 54,182 Technical Services, General .................................................... 46,848 Quick Responses . . . 3,901 Special Studies ........... ................................................ .. 93,382 Hydrologic Studies ......... .................................................. 39,944 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA .................................. $310,861 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Crookston, M N ......... .................................................. $518,465 East Grand Forks, MN ...... 2,038,518 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .................................... $2,556,983 1. Excludes $111,158 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $60,627 for International Water Studies under O & M Appropriation. 16-32 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). Location. Mississippi River rises in northern Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. The latest map and profile showing this section of river are in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a 2.7 mile basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 17-C, 17-D, 17-E, and 17-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government 17-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See Table 17-F for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: None. Maintenance: During the 1999 navigation season, the Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 284,491 cubic yards of material at six sites. Government derrick barge HAUSER/WADE removed 5,265 cubic yards of material at two sites. Government pipeline dredge DUBUQUE removed 37,138 cubic yards of material at two sites. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 197,401 cubic yards of material at 12 sites, and contracted hydraulic dredging removed 249,381 cubic yards for four sites. Major maintenance projects included structural rehabilitation at Dam 10, the first stage of bluff protection at Lock 1, central control building and electrical controls at Lock 6, placement site excavation in Pool 4 (Grand Encampment), and crane rail metalizing on Lower Saint Anthony Falls dam. Projects commenced in FY 99 that are underway include the central control building and electrical controls at Lock 5A, the second stage of the bluff protection at Lock 1, sandblasting and painting of the bridge at Dam 8, placement site excavation in Pool 2, and installation of the crane carrier on the Lower Saint Anthony Falls dam. The crane carrier supply contract also remains underway. Operating and Care: Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation projects at Locks and Dams 3 and 5A through 9 continued. The central control building and electrical controls at Lock 6, was completed in FY 99. The central control building and electrical controls at Lock 5A is underway. The crane carrier supply contract also remains underway. The major rehabilitation project at Lock and Dam 3 was reevaluated because of the increased cost for the recommended plan. A new plan was formulated and plans and specifications began on a new alignment (Lower Alignment). During the design process a valuable mussel bed was discovered within the footprint of this new alignment. The bed contains one Wisconsin endangered and three Wisconsin threatened mussel species. NEPA coordination with permitting agencies including revised EA, is ongoing. Construction on the first stage at Dike was completed. Costs to St. Paul were $41,784,260 for operation and maintenance and $4,098,500 for rehabilitation; for a total cost of $45,882,764. Rock Island District. New Work: None. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government Cutterhead Pipeline Dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, and 24, with a total cost of 344,867 cubic yards of material being removed. Mechanical Dredging was performed at three locations with a total of 50,000 cubic yards being removed. The total cost of dredging was $3,168,400. Continuing construction includes; Sandblast, paint and repairs to Lock and Dam 14, Lock and Dam 17 Dam chain replacement, Repair upper guidewall at Lock and Dam 15, Rehab of Lock and Dam 16 control station, LeClaire Base redevelopment, utility corridor stage I, Lock and Dam 22 maintenance building roof repair, Lock 19 parking and utilities, and Thompson Causeway road repair. Construction initiated includes Rehab of Lock and Dam 18 control station, Concrete repairs at Lock and Dam 11 and Lock and Dam 12, Lock and Dam 14 control station roof repair, install bubbler piping and compressor at Lock and Dam 20, and Lock and Dam 22 miter gate machinery repairs. Maintenance for the Navigation Function continued at a cost of $21,923,500 (includes dredging costs). Environmental Stewardship- Maintenance of Natural Resources Facilities continued at a cost of $15,900. Maintenance of Recreation Features continued at a cost of $905,500. Total maintenance costs for Operation and Maintenance were $22,844,900, and $1,100,000 for Maintenance and Operations costs. Net credits to the project were $71,600, primarily as a result of collection from towboat companies for damages for lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operations for Navigation continued at a cost of $14,311,200. Environmental Stewardship - Management of Natural Resources continued at a cost of $231,100. Operations for the Recreation Function continued at a cost of $1,764,300. Total operation costs were $16,306,600. Total operations and maintenance costs were $39,151,500, and maintenance and operations cost were $1,100,000. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation was continued at Locks and Dams 13, 14, and 15 for a total cost of $89,170, $3,322,472, and $9,880, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $3,431,402. 17-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Costs to the Rock Island District were $39,079,945 for operations and maintenance and $3,421,527 for major rehabilitation for a total cost of $42,501,472. St. Louis District. New Work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 Replacement, were $25,733 for real estate acquisition; $524,556 for the dam, $247,090 for the locks, -$219 for channels, $981,874 for buildings, grounds and utilities, $280,253 for permanent operating equipment, $370,014 for engineering, $131,449 for supervision and administration. Cost for Melvin Price totaled $2,560,750. Costs incurred for the second lock were $40,000 for the dam, $601,726 for the lock, $96,275 for permanent operating equipment, and $14,796 for engineering; a total of $752,797. Total cost of new work was $3,313,547. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation continued in FY 1999 at Lock and Dam 25 with construction contracts and the preparation of contract documents at a cost of $413 for real estate, $197,522 for the dam, $4,153,555 for the lock, $409,406 for engineering, and $232,181 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 25 totaled $4,993,077. Major rehabilitation also continued at Lock and Dam 24 at a cost of -$7,681 for real estate; $1,571,154 for the dam, $4,734,710 for the lock; -$23,120 for channels; $693,317 for engineering; and $256,740 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 24 totaled $7,225,118. Total rehabilitation cost $12,218,195. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other work accomplished was management of natural resources, operation of recreation areas, condition and operation studies, water control management, and other studies and reports for a total cost of $5,985,748. Maintenance: Total maintenance cost $8,689,513. Costs to the St. Louis District were $3,313,547 for new work on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Second Lock; $12,218,195 for major rehabilitation, $14,675,261 for operations and maintenance for a total cost of $30,207,003. Total Federal costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year for the three Districts were $2,937,000 for new work; $95,539,000 regular funds for operation and maintenance; and $11,319,400 regular funds for rehabilitation. Total costs for FY 99 were $109,795,683. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; small boat harbors and commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Alma, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 51,546.46 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,612.55 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Dredge sites acquired in FY 99 added 19.91 acres in fee and 27 acres in permanent easement to Pool 2. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: FY 00 projected acquisitions include approximately 30 acres fee and 15 acres permanent easement for Pools 3, 7, and 10. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum depths for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hannibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 92,504.394 acres in fee and 11,624.051 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: None. St. Louis District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation, with the exception of the remaining work at Melvin Price. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of land in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 4,201 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining at the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project includes the esplanade access road. 17-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 September 1999 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp.2 $ 3,831,000 $ 3,462,000 3,194,000 $2,805,000 $1,190,257,629 and Minneapolis, Cost3 5,212,518 3,163,733 3,599,479 2,937,000 1,149,225,023 Minnesota (Federal Maint.4 Funds) Approp. 88,898,905 98,145,565 94,949,282 95,438,390 1,737,745,380 Cost 89,613,822 95,938,787 59,803,497 95,539,206 1,756,317,984 Rehab. Approp. 8,319,000 6,637,000 15,321,104 11,368,734 223,978,459 Cost 7,782,163 9,244,165 22,054,036 11,319,477 230,274,665 Inland Waterway New Work Trust Fund Approp. 0 0 0 344,000 344,000 Cost 0 0 0 376,547 376,547 Inland Waterway Rehab. Trust Fund Appro. 0 0 0 8,385,387 8,385,387 Cost 0 0 0 8,418,746 8,418,746 (Contributed Funds) New Work:5 Approp. 1,693,000 4,289,000 11,409,660 0 39,375,445 Cost 5,453,084 3,588,035 11,488,087 0 38,581,892 1. Includes $15,476,259 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $939,804,000. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $937,688,861. 4. Includes $1,949,301 for maintenance on previous project. 5. Funding from Inland Waterways Trust Fund was included in the contributed funds up to FY 98. 17-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 17-B TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,184,2462 24,210,071 $9,071,214 $ 93,465,531 Maintenance 756,411,891 -- -- 756,411,891 Rehabilitation 87,792,712 -- -- 87,792,712 Total 904,388,849 24,210,071 9,071,214 937,670,134 Rock Island New Workld4 71,307,9455 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 Maintenance6 151,371,294 -- -- 151,371,294 Rehabilitation 109,805,460 -- -- 109,805,460 Total 332,484,699 17,403,322 11,338,865 361,226,886 St. Louis New Work' 968,793,6787 10,282,566 2,440,266 981,516,517 Maintenance 320,135,788 -- -- 320,135,728 Rehabilitation 36,697,804 -- -- 36,697,804 Total $1,325,627,269 10,282,566 2,440,266 $1,338,350,109 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Cost subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $939,688,861 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 17-6 TABLE 17-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion1 (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony 853.3 Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 847.6 Lock and dam 2 815.2 Lock and dam 3 796.9 Lock and dam 4 752.8 S Lock and dam 5 738.1 Lock and dam 5A 728.5 Lock and dam 6 714.3 Lock and dam 7 702.5 Lock and dam 8 679.2 Lock and dam 9 647.9 Lock and dam 10 615.1 Lock and dam 11 583.0 Lock and dam 12 556.7 In city of Minneapolis, MN In city of Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis- St. Paul, MN 1.3 above Hastings, MN 6.1 above Red Wing, MN Alma, WI Minneiska, MN 3 above Winona, MN Trempealeau, WI Dresbach, MN Genoa, WI 3.3 below Lynxville, WI Guttenberg, IA 3.7 above Dubuque, IA Bellevue, IA 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.94 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. 100 piles 56 400 35.94 725.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 100 56 400 35.9 -- 12.5' 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 -- 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 100 1108 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 100 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 100 silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 100 and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 100 and gravel. 110 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 110 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 100 gravel and and clay. silt. 110 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 100 and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 100 gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 99 gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99 and gravel, and gravel. -- $ 18,203,0003 1959 12,382,000 s 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 2,358,0006 6,492,0009 5,596,000 4,865,000 5,081,000 4,549,000 4,874,000 5,574,000 6,061,000 1938 6,539,000 1936 4,750,000 1937 7,428,000 1938 5,580,000 z 0 0d hd 7d I LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Chamin- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 13 522.5 Lock and dam 14 493.3 Le Claire Lock 493.1 (Canal) Lock and dam 15 482.9 Lock and dam 16 457.2 - Lock and dam 17 437.1 00 Lock and dam 18 410.5 Lock and dam 19 364.2 Lock and dam 20 343.2 Lock and dam 21 324.9 Lock and dam 22 301.2 Lock and dam 24 273.4 Lock and dam 25 241.4 Lock and dam 26 202.9 (Henry T. Rainey Dam)' 4.3 above Clinton, IA 3.7 below Le Claire, IA 3.9 below Le Claire, IA Foot of Arsenal Island, Rock Island, IL 1.8 above Muscatine, IA 4.2 above New Boston, IL 6.5 above Burlington, IA Keokuk, IA 0.9 above Canton, MO 2.1 below Quincy, IL 1.5 below Saverton, MO Clarksville, MO Cap Au Gris, MO Alton, IL 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, clay and gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. 80 320 11.0 -- 17.6 10.9 Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. 110 360 16.0 -- 17.011 11.0 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 9.0 600 8.0 600 9.8 358 38.2 1,200 600 10.0 600 10.5 600 10.2 600 15.0 600 15.0 600 24.0 360 24.0 545.0 536.0 528.0 518.2 480.0 470.0 459.5 449.0 434.0 419.0 _-- 17.0 16.0 16.5 4.5 5.0 15.0 16.5 18.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 16.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.7 Piles in sand. 9.2 Rock. 13.0 12.0 Rock. 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.8 Rock. 12.0 Rock and piles. 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 10.0 Piles in sand. 10.0 Piles in sand 100 and gravel. Rock. 92 Rock. 100 Rock. 100 Piles in sand 98 and gravel. Piles in sand. 99 Piles in sand. 90 Rock. 100 99 Rock and 97 piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand 95 and gravel. Rock. 99 Piles in sand. 9914 Piles in sand 9914 and gravel. Piles and sand. 100 1938 7,502,000 1939 1922 1934 1937 1939 1937 1913 1957 1936 1938 1938 1940 1939 1938 6,284,000 -10 14,201,000 9,788,000 5,843,000 10,308,000 14,813,00012 6,281,000 8,065,000 5,275,000 10,337,000 13,694,000 12,824,000 TABLE 17-C (Continued) 0 0 O0 0 z0i 7d y0 7d 0 TABLE 17-C LOCKS AND DAMS (Continued) Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost < Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to 97 1990 745,009,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to 93 1994 226,000,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams $1,196,556,000 1. Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. J 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) S 6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & M appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Landward lock. 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 13. Includes cash contribution of $4,900,000. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 15. Lock and Dam 26 has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks and Dam at which full pool was raised 1 February 1990. Lock and Dam 26 has been removed. of z 0 z do TABLE 17-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI S Winona Harbors, MN O Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA Fort Madison Harbor, IA 836.5-839.2 839.7 813.2 791.4 791.1 785.9 773.0 767.1 760.0 751.3 726.0 726.2 663.3 635.5 635.0 579.4 537.3 519.0 488.0 484.2 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 383.7 In city of St. Paul, MN Commercial Channel improvement, Small-boat Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. Lower end of city of Small-boat Hastings, MN In city of Red Wing, MN Commercial In city of Red Wing, MN Small-boat Upper end of Bay City, Small-boat WI In city of Lake City, MN Small-boat Commercial 3 Small-boat 3 In city of Pepin, WI Small-boat Upper end of city of Small-boat Wabasha, MN Upper end of Alma, WI Small-boat In city of Winona, MN Small-boat Latsch Island Crooked Slough Commercial Upper end of city of Small-boat Lansing, IA Upper end of city of Small-boat Prairie du Chien, WI In Marais de St. Friol Commercial East Channel below Hwy bridges. At Dubuque, IA At Savanna, IL At Clinton, IA At Moline, IL At Lindsay Park At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat 9 400-1,000 5 300 5 955 59955 5 5 9 5 5 9 12 5 5 5 5 Entrance channel 6 small-boat harbor Small-boat 5 Small-boat 5 Freight terminal 9 approach channel Small-boat 5 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 340 280 400 230 200 100 40 150 200 250 2.7(mile) 400 500 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 500 800 1,000 frontage 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 435 950 1,890 900 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 78 100 100 100 100 100 100 100O $ 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,800' 8,700 39,4002 93,500 1,077,0004 205,5005 41,700 56,300 89,800 84,700 95,300 85,500 93,100 55,200 310,000 101,912 110,328 262,100 31,000 21,000 353,000 184,200 z TABLE 17-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Project Approximate size (feet) Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 __6 Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,269,640 1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. J z 0 z REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 17-E ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety $ 3,348,200 Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater 7,049,700' Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River 545,000 Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation 193,600 Miscellaneous 1,312,9002 Total additional features 18,705,900= Total existing project (new work) $ 516,183,512 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. TABLE 17-F LICENSE FEES COLLECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1999 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1999 St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 $ 119,677 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,966,240 Lock and Dam No. 2 City of Hastings, MN. 24,163 253,351 TOTAL $ 7,339,268 17-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Work Authorized MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable.4 Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Documents None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 17-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 17-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1959 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 31, 1992 Oct. 12, 1996 Opposite Hamburg, IL harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL. 2 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools. Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna2, Moline, Andalusia, New Boston5, Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk3, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN ; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville ", WI. Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) Authorized a second lock at Locks and Dam 26, Alton, Illinois and Missouri Modified PL 95-502 to authorize recreational development at Melvin Price Locks and Dam, requiring no separable project lands and cost sharing. Authorized the construction of a 24,000 square foot regional visitor center at Melvin Price Locks and Dam. Amended PL 101-640 to allow the use of project lands and other contiguous non-project lands. 1. Deauthorized FY 75. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 5. Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 6. Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 17-14 H. Doe. 254, 81st Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None Public Law 95-502 Public Law 97-118 Public Law 99-662 Public Law 101-640 Public Law 102-580 Public Law 104-303 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams . . . . . . . . . Page 1. Allegheny River, PA.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River... . 18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV.......... 18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River.......... 18-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV....................18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects. ...... 18-4 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Elkins,W V...................... 18-4 8. Johnstown, PA... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-4 9. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA... . . . . 18-5 10. Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA . . . . . . . . . 18-5 11. South Central, PA Environment Improvement Program......................18-5 12. West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control 18-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH... . . . . . 18-7 14. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-7 15. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . 18-7 16. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA...............18-8 17. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY . . . . . . . . . 18-8 18. Lower Girard Dam, OH.............18-8 19 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA...... 18-8 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-9 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-9 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH . 18-9 23. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) . . . . 18-10 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-10 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV............... .18-10 26. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..... 18-11 27. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . 18-12 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-12 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and M D. .................... 18-12 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-13 31. Other authorized flood control projects. . . . 18-13 32. Flood control work under special authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-13 General Investigations 33. Surveys.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-13 34. Collection and study of basic data.... . . . . . 18-13 35. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design... . 18-13 36. Research and development............18-13 37. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment.................18-13 38. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration . . . . . . . . 18-13 Tables Table 18-A Cost & Financial Statement . . . Table 18-B Authorizing Legislation . . . . . . Table 18-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects................ Table 18-D Not Applicable. Table 18-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 18-F Not Applicable. Table 18-G Deauthorized Projects. . . . . . .. Table 18-H Allegheny River Statistics ...... Table 18-I Monongahela River Statistics. .. Table 18-J Monongahela River Total Costs.. . Table 18-K Ohio River Basin Reservoirs . . . Table 18-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. . . . . . . . . .. Table 18-M Flood Control Work Under Special Special Authorization.... . . . . . . . 18-14 . 18-18 . 18-23 . 18-23 . 18-25 . 18-26 . 18-27 . 18-28 . 18-28 . 18-29 . 18-30 18-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 321 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations & Maintenance, General: During FY 99 there were two major maintenance and repair contracts awarded on the Allegheny River. Refacing the lock chamber walls at Lock 7 at a cost of $3,161,673, and resurfacing the lock river wall at Lock 2 at a cost of $2,539,350. Contracts will be accomplished in FY00. Major work accomplished by Government hired labor on the Allegheny River included renovating downstream lock gate anchorages and operating machinery at Lock 3 at a cost of $244,970, i new upstream and downstream lock gates at Lock 2 at a cost of $266,953, and replacing river wall emptying valves and renovating operating machinery at Lock 6 at a cost of $286,698. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects was derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Construction of a new lock at Point Marion was competed and put into service in December 1993. Construction of a new lock at Grays Landing was completed and put into service in May 1993. Construction of the dam at Grays Landing was completed in December 1995. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid prod- 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT ucts. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-toriver and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the new Grays Landing dam was completed in December 1995 at an approximate cost of $25,000,000. Construction of the lock was completed in May, 1993 at a contract cost of approximately $80,000,000. Removal of the old fixed crest dam and river lock wall at Lock and Dam 7 was completed in FY 96 at a cost of $2,800,000. Work continues on cultural resources and the acquisition of real estate for the remainder of the project. The present project consists of 84 acres of fee land and 403.3 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in September 2000, is $181,000,000. Construction of the new lock for the Point Marion Project was completed in December, 1993 at a cost of $78,800,000. Land acquired for the project consists of 58 acres of fee land and 77.4 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the Point Marion project is $111,700,000. Approximately $300,000 of closeout work remains to be completed and two outstanding contractor claims must be resolved. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the District to proceed with navigation improvements on the Lower Monongahela River. The project includes replacement of the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raising the existing pool 2 by 5 feet, construction of twin 84' x 720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and the elimination of Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. The changes in pool elevations will adversely affect numerous municipally-owned facilities, which the Corps will adjust at project cost. The total estimated fully funded cost of the project is $705 M, consisting of $352.5 M from General Appropriations from the US Treasury and $352.5 M from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design activities were initiated in January 1992 and were concluded in September 1994. The FY 95 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act provided $8 M for the project, of which $4.1 M was in the Construction General appropriation, which allowed construction to begin, consisting of modifications to the Locks 2 auxiliary chamber floodway bulkhead; this work is complete. In February 1996, a $606 K contract was awarded for the procurement of 750 tons of PS31 sheet pile for the renovation and extension of the Locks 2 upper guardwall. In April 1996, a $3.4 M contract was awarded for this upper guardwall work; it was completed in November 1997. The FY 1998 Appropriations Act contained $12.7 M for the project, which allowed for the award of the construction contract for new abutments for the new gated Braddock Dam. This $13 M contract to Brayman Construction began in March 1998 and is nearing completion. The FY 99 appropriation of $26.5 million allowed for the timely completion of the abutments construction and for the award of the second and main contract for the In-the-Wet construction of the new Braddock Dam. On 22 December 1998, the District issued a Request for Proposal for the construction of the new Braddock Dam. On 1 July 1999 the District awarded a contract to the Joint Venture of J.A. Jones Construction Company and Traylor Bros., Inc. to construct the new Braddock Dam. The Notice to Proceed was issued on 30 July 1999. The FY 2000 appropriation of $45 M will fund the Braddock Dam construction, and will be used to continue design and construction of the federal relocations effort and for design of the new Charleroi Locks and the relocation of a Norfolk Southern railroad bridge. If additional monies become available in FY 2000, the District will be able to initiate advance construction at Locks 4, consisting of the new riverwall and upper guardwall, fabrication of the new locks miter gates, tainter valves and bulkheads, downstream dam scour protection and upstream approach training dikes. Selected advance dredging in Pool 3 could also begin. The overall project is scheduled for completion in FY 2008. Operations and Maintenance, General: Major work accomplished by Government hired labor on the Monongahela River included renovating middlewall emptying butterfly valve at Lock 2 at a cost of $490,000, installing upstream lock gates at Lock 4 at a cost of $115,000, renovating middlewall emptying valve and renovating operating machinery at a cost of $560,000, dewatering 56'x720' land lock chamber and renovating middlewall emptying valve at Lock 3 at a cost of $1,254,000. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Present project lands consist of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Licenses. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted a license to the City of Grafton for construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at this project (FERC license 7307). Details of the design and other issues are still being finalized. The deadline for the start of project construction expired on April 15, 1995; however, the developer has requested an extension. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, General: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Contract for Low Flow Valve Replacement, in the amount of $830,000 was completed in FY 99. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 99 were $7,917,000; total benefits through September 30, 1999, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $1,026,689. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as the State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in the reservoir area. Tygart Dam is a candidate for the Dam Safety Program. An Evaluation Report was initiated in March 1994 to address spillway capacity and structural stability in relation to the probable maximum flood event. The report was approved in March 1996. Findings of the report concluded that under present conditions, the probable maximum flood would overtop the dam and cause failure. The report recommends protecting the dam from failure to include downstream erosion protection and stilling basin modifications. The Design Memorandum was completed in September 1998 and Plans and Specifications were completed in July 1999. The construction contract was advertised in August 1999 and awarded to Joseph B. Fay Co. on 28 September 1999 for $5,628,929. The Notice to Proceed was issued in October 1999 and the project is scheduled to be completed in September 2001. The project features include construction of a new road to provide access to the left bank abutement of the dam, new concrete channels consisting of a concrete wall (end sill) and concrete slope paving on the downstream side of the dam, new concrete lagging retaining walls on the left and right banks of the dam, modification of the existing parapet wall, and minor repairs to the roadway decking. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV). Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of.channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Present project lands consist of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections were made. Project was last inspected in October 1997. Flood damages prevented through FY 99 were estimated to be $19,669,000. 8. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Present project lands consist of easements over 199 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. The rules of local cooperation for the rehabilitation of the existing project are governed by the FY 91 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act. Pursuant to this Act, the City of Johnstown will have a limited role in securing the needed rights of access to non-federal structures included in the line of protection and will hold and save the United States from damages due to construction or operation and maintenance of the work on the non-federal structures, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The FY 1991 Energy and Water Resources Development Appropriations Act authorized and directed the Corps to undertake a major rehabilita- 18-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT tion of the existing project. The Project Design Memorandum was approved in June 1995. The major rehabilitation work is to be accomplished under the Construction, General appropriation at an estimate cost of $32.5 million. Contract plans and specifications were initiated in July 1995. Four of six construction contracts were awarded through September 1999. The fifth of six construction contracts will be awarded in July 2000. The project is scheduled to be physically complete in April 2003. The Construction, General work consists of the repair of 54 exisiting wall sections, slope paving and replacement of balustrade (safety) wall. Also included in the major rehabilitation is all the necessary Operation and Maintenance funded work. The O&M work estimated to cost $8.3 M consists of concrete spall repairs, slope paving joint repairs, sediment removal and miscellaneous repairs. Through FY 99 $13.3 M CG and $2.7 M O&M has been expended. Flood damages prevented by the project through September 30, 1999 were estimated to be $802,916,000. 9. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Present project lands consist of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general. Operation Activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. Survey cross sections were taken at Unit 1 in preparation of sediment removal. Total flood damages prevented through FY 99 were estimated to be $72,002,000. 10. SAW MILL RUN, PITTSBURGH, PA Location: The project is located within the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, at Ohio River Mile 0.7 and traverses upstream from the mouth of Saw Mill Run approximately 4,700 L.F. Existing Project: The proposed project was authorized in WRDA of 1986 in accordance with the Chief of Engineers report dated 30 January 1978. The WRDA 1996 increased the project estimate to $12,780,000, the current project estimate in 1994 dollars. In FY 97 this project was included in the FY 97 appropriations as a new construction start. Local Cooperation: The City of Pittsburgh is the local sponsor for this project and is responsible for real estate acquisition and relocation design and construction. The project will be cost shared 75% Federal and 25% non-federal in accordance with the requirements of WRDA 86. Operations during fiscal year: In October 1997, a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed with the City of Pittsburgh. In June 1998, the District executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the purpose of allowing the District to acquire the real estate and complete relocation work on behalf of the city. With the MOA executed and the funds for this effort transferred to the District in July 1998, real estate acquisition was initiated, and is currently scheduled to be completed in May 2000. In FY 99, the District continued with the preparation of Plans and Specifications for the project. Plans and Specifications are scheduled to be completed in May 2000. The construction contract is currently scheduled for advertisement in May 2000. 11. SOUTH CENTRAL, PA ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location: Projects under this program in the Pittsburgh District are located in the South Central PA counties of Allegheny, Armstrong, Cambria, Fayette, Indiana, Somerset and Westmoreland. Existing Projects. Section 313 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to provide design and construction assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. The following projects were authorized under Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The Forest Hills Municipal Authority(FHMA) project consists of the fast track planning, design and construction of a wastewater treatment plant, pump substations, interceptor lines and collection systems. The treatment system will provide service to four boroughs and five townships that currently are not serviced. The total project cost is estimated at $40,300,000 ($13,150,000 Federal cost, $27,150,000 non-Federal cost). The Burrell Township Sanitary Authority project consists of the installation of gravity sanitary sewers and pump stations. The total project cost is estimated at $4,700,000 ($1,750,000 Federal cost, $2,950,000 non-Federal cost). The Blacklick Valley Municipal Authority project consists of the installation of potable water transmission and distribution lines. The total project cost is estimated at $2,750,000 ($1,450,000 Federal cost, $1,300,000 non-Federal cost). The Redstone Township Sewer Authority project consists of the design of a wastewater treatment plant and conveyance system. The total project cost is estimated at $626,000 ($500,000 Federal cost, $126,000 non-Federal cost). The Westmoreland County Industrial Development Corporation project consists of waterline and sanitary sewer extensions. The total project cost is estimated at $700,000 ($450,000 Federal cost, $250,000 non-Federal cost). The Indiana County Municipal Services Authority (ICMSA) will be the sponsor for the White Township project which consists of construction of a wastewater treatment plant, interceptor sewer, sani- 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 tary sewer extension and upgrade of an existing pump station. The total project cost is estimated at $5,720,000 ($1,000,000 Federal cost, $4,720,000 non-Federal cost). The East Huntingdon Township project consists of construction of a new 250,000 GPD sewage treatment plant, interceptor and collector sewers. The total project cost is estimated at $5,900,000 ($4,200,000 Federal cost, $1,700,000 non-Federal cost). The Somerset County Economic Development Council project consists of upgrading the infrastructure and utilities backbone of the Somerset Industrial Park Facility. The total project cost is estimated at $550,000 ($380,000 Federal cost, $170,000 non-Federal cost). The Redevelopment Authority of the County of Westmoreland project consists of providing an additional 50,000 GPD sewage treatment plant, extending sewer and waterlines and providing a water booster pump station. The total project cost is estimated at $650,000 ($375,000 Federal cost, $275,000 non-Federal cost). The Municipal Authority of Portage will be the sponsor for the Cassandra Borough project which consists of replacement of the Ben's Creek interconnect line and the replacement of the Borough of Cassandra's water system. The total project cost is estimated at $1,400,000 ($1,000,000 Federal cost, $400,000 non-Federal cost). The Municipal Authority of the Borough of Cresson project consists of eliminating the raw sewage by-pass at the main pump station and upgrade and expand the existing treatment plant. The total project cost is estimated at $7,100,000 ($4,500,000 Federal cost, $2,600,000 non-Federal cost). The Ligonier Borough Council project consists of replacement of the vitrified clay pipe collection system. The total project cost is estimated at $800,000 ($720,000 Federal cost, $80,000 non-Federal cost). Additional projects identified for FY 99 funding include New Bethlehem, Smithfield, Ohiopyle, Penn Hills, Scott Township, Shaler Township and Armagh, Marion Center and Heilwood. Local Cooperation. Legislation requires the project to be cost shared at no more than 75% Federal funds and a minimum of 25% non-Federal funds. Project Cooperation Agreements are executed between the Corps of Engineers and the Non-Federal Sponsors. Sanitary Authority is required prior to design and construction efforts. Operation and maintenance of the project will be at 100% non-Federal cost. Operations during fiscal year. The construction PCA for the Forest Hills project was executed on 22 October and construction began in November 1998. A construction PCA was submitted and executed on 28 Jan 1999 for the Blacklick project and construction began in February 1998. Construction PCA's were executed for Burrell, Westmoreland Distribution, East Huntingdon and Somerset projects on 20 November 1998, 19 February 1999, 7 April 1999 and 7 April 1999 respectively. Design PCA's were executed for White Township, Westmoreland Business and Research, Cassandra Borough, Borough of Cresson and Borough of Ligonier projects on 8 January 1999, 12 August 1998, 8 September 1999, 10 November 1999 and 27 September 1999 respectively. Designs for the efforts are all underway and between 25% and 90% complete. Design PCA's will be submitted for the following projects in FY00: New Bethlehem, Smithfield, Borough of Patton, Ohiopyle, Penn Hills, Scott Township, Shaler Township and Armagh, Marion Center and Heilwood. Construction PCA's will be submitted for the following projects in FY00: White Township, Westmoreland Business and Research, New Bethlehem, Smithfield, Cassandra Borough, Borough of Cresson, Borough of Ligonier, Borough of Patton, Ohiopyle and Armagh, Marion Center and Heilwood. 12. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL Location. Project under this program in the Pittsburgh District are located in the Tygart River Basin in West Virginia and the lower Allegheny River in Pennsylvania. The priority (named in the legislation) communities located in West Virginia are Phillipi and Belington. The priority communities in Pennsylvania are New Bethlehem, Clymer, Benson, Hooversville, Meyersdale, Connellsville and Dubois. Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to design and construct flood control measures for these priority communities at a level of protection sufficient to prevent future losses from flooding equivalent to that which occurred in January 1996, but at least no less than a 100 year level of protection. Project development will consist of developing a least cost plan including structural and/or non-structural elements, to provide the authorized level of protection without guard to a benefit/cost ratio. Local Cooperation. The reconnaisance phase is 100% Federally funded. The Detailed Project Report, Plans and Specifications and Construction phases are cost shared at 65% Federal funds and 35% non-Federal funds. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) is required to design efforts and a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is required prior to project construction. In September 1998, Director of Civil Works, HQUSACE, approved the District's request for a waiver of the up front cost sharing for the design portion of the West Virginia projects. The basis for the approval of the waiver was that the priority communities in West Virginia qualified for a reduced cost share (5%) based on the ability to pay provisions of Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operation during fiscal year. In Pennsylvania, the General Management Plans for the seven communities was completed in January 1999. Project Study Plans (PSP) for the seven communities are currently being developed. The PSP outlines requirements of the Detail Project Report(DPR) and the funding requirements. All PSPs will be completed by July 2000. Design Agreements are also being prepared and current plans call for the execution of these agreements pending the local sponsors' ability to obtain the non-Federal cost share. In West Virginia, the PSPs for the two communities were completed in September of 1998. Since no Design Agreement is required for these two communities, work on the DPRs officially started in December 1998, following the November 1998 approval of the PSPs by CELRD. The DPRs for the two communities remain under development. The screening level work required in the DPR for both communities is completed. The DPRs will be 18-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT completed in March and April of 2001. A decision to implement a Flood Warning System as an early action item was made in September 1999. An interim DPR for the Flood Warning System is also under development and will be completed in August of 2000. Implementation of the Flood Warning System will follow this pending the local sponsors' ability to obtain cost share funds. Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. BERLIN LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started in January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Construction of New Bridge Service in the amount of $2,985,994 was started in FY 98 and continued into FY 99. This contract was 95% complete in FY 99 and will be completed in FY 00. The National Recreation Reservation Service was initiated at the Mill Creek Recreation Area during the FY 99 recreation season. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 99 were $13,742,000; total benefits through September 1999, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $480,735,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 14. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Present project lands consist of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing Conemaugh Lake was constructed downstream of the dam under FERC Licenses 3207. The 15-megawatt project began commercial operation on February 6, 1989. It is owned by National Renewable Resources, Inc. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Dredging in the amount of $1.9 M was completed in FY 99. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 99 were $10,480,000; total flood control benefits through September 1999, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $1,518,121,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. 15. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,561.7 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Volunteer labor was utilized to install a new playground and to stain/paint comfort stations, picnic pavilions, and administrative buildings. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 99 were $8,354,000; total benefits achieved through September 1999, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were estimated at $286,310,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 16. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Volunteer labor was utilized to apply limestone sand to tributary streams in an effort to neutralize acid mine drainage into the lake. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1999 revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District were $73,783,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public- use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 17. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Present project lands consist of 2,646 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.0 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1999, revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $948,089,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. LOWER GIRARD DAM, OH Location. Lower Girard Lake(formerly called Liberty Lake)is located in the northeast section of Ohio in Trumbull County in the City of Girard which lies just northwest of the City of Youngstown, Ohio. Lower Girard Lake Dam is located on Squaw Creek approximately 5,000 feet downstream of Girard Lake and approximately 2 miles upstream from Squaw Creek's confluence with the Mahoning River. Existing Project. Lower Girard Lake together with Girard Lake, located immediately upstream, is a system of water supply reservoirs that was constructed in 1917 and operated by the Ohio Water Service Company to provide process water to local steel mills and industry. The Lower and Upper Girard Dams were purchased by the City of Girard from the Consumer Ohio Water Company in 1995. The dam is an Ambersen type buttress dam. It has been determined that the dam requires rehabilitation to meet modern dam safety standards. Local Cooperation. The City of Girard, Ohio is the non-Federal sponsor for this project. The City owns the dam and the lake impounded by it. Cost-sharing for this project will be 75% Federal and 25% by the City. Operations during the fiscal year. In WRDA 1998 Congressman Trafficant added $2.1 million for the Corps to investigate the safety of, and rehabilitate the Lower Girard Dam. In July 1998 a Design Agreement was executed between the Corps and the City. The Special Report and Environmental Assessment was completed in September 1999. The report recommended the repair of the dam to bring it up to present day safety standards. 19. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Res- 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT ervoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Present project lands consist of 3,330.8 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 99 were $4,624,000; total benefits through September 1999, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $320,178,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 22.9 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 1941. Present project lands consist of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Contracts for Concrete Repairs on Dam, in the amount of $1.2 M, and of the Electrical System, Hydro Pumps, and Low Flow Valves, in the amount of $1.4 M were completed in FY 99. Estimated flood damages prevented by this project for FY 99 were $14,308,000; total benefits through September 30, 1999, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $429,075,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 21. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Present project lands consist of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. The State of Ohio has a lease from the Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in the reservoir area. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this FY were $3,840,000. Total benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1999 were $169,155,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as state of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 22. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 12.6 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. 18-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Present project lands consist of 11,180.4 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $2,871,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1999 were $118,622,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included. 24 SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for lowwater regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Present project lands consists of 14,485.94 acres in fee and easements over 198 acres. Approximately 65.94 acres in abandoned railroad right-ofway were acquired for project use. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. An $85,000 contract was completed for Pavement Rehab of the boat launch parking lot in the Mahaney Recreation Area. In-house labor installed 50-amp electric service to 15 additional camping spurs in the Shenango Recreation Area. Volunteer labor installed two additional playgrounds. A construction service IDIQ contract was utilized to resurface facility roads for $89,000. The National Recreation Service (NRRS) was initiated at the Shenango Recreation Area during the FY 99 recreation season. Estimated flood control benefits achieved through September 30, 1999 revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $98,731,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 25. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles.A station hydropower plant completed in 1995 supplies power to the dam and administration building, with excess power being sold to an electric utility company. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1991) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated $24,900,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) 18-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Present project lands consist of 20,451 acres in fee and easements over 398 acres. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The Corps is working with the State of WV to revise the Master Plan to incorporate higher revenue producing recreation facilities, including a lodge, golf course, cabins and camping. The revised Master Plan was approved by the Corps in June 1992, but with the stipulation that a costsharing contract amendment must be executed prior to the award of a construction contract for the granting of any cost-sharing credits. The FY 1992 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act allows the State costsharing credits for all of these facilities except the golf course. In March, 1994, the State and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works ASA(CW) executed an amendment to the 1977 Stonewall Jackson Lake Recreation Cost-Sharing Contract to reflect these credits. The State of West Virginia now must design and build the approved remaining recreation facilities within ten years of the executed amendment, or March 2004, in accordance with the timeframes and conditions set forth in the amended contract. The WV State Supreme Court has ruled that the sale of $6 million in revenue bonds for the design and construction of the lodge, additional camping and golf course may not proceed. In 1996, the State issued a solicitation for interest and qualifications to create a public/private joint venture for the purpose of developing recreational facilities at Stonewall Jackson Lake Park. In October 1997, the State selected a private firm to design and build the remaining recreational facilities. Section 508 of the FY 1998 Energy and Water Appropriations Act provides for cost sharing credits for this public/private development against the current $21.5 million owed to the government by the State of WV. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 99 were $1,287,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1999, revised to include downstream districts, were $88,478,000. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Present project lands consists of 2,794.77 acres in fee and easement over 13.1 acres. Approximately 2.53 acres of fee were disposed at the project. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. The National Recreation Reservation Service (NRRS) was initiated at the Tionesta Recreation Area campground during the FY 99 recreation season. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1999, revised to include downstream districts, were $419,494,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment non-gated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Present project lands consist of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.29 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance ofthe structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 99 were $1,720,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1999, revised to include downstream districts, were $46,046,000. 28. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 99 were $1,825,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1999, revised to include downstream districts, were $26,491,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 29. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Present project lands consist of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control 18-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing releases from Youghiogheny River Lake was constructed in accordance with FERC License 3623. D/R Hydro Company is the authorized representative of the Licensee, Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Authority, and is responsible for operation of the plant. It has a 10- megawatt capacity. The plant began commercial operation on December 7, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A $200,000 contract for the construction of a campground road was completed in FY 99. In-house labor constructed 8 high-impact campsites at the Outflow Recreation Area. An IDIQ construction services contract was utilized to repair $35,000 worth of pavement in the Tub Run and Outflow recreation areas. The National Recreation Reservation Service (NRRS) was initiated in the Tub Run and Outflow campgrounds during the FY 99 recreation season. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 99 were $10,561,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1999 revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts, were $407,323,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $86,236. Total cost to September 30, 1999 was $2,073,998. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Total Cost for Fiscal Year General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Special Investigations FERC Licensing Activities Interagency Water Resources Development Coordination Studies with Other Agencies Review of Authorized Projects Total Cost for Fiscal Year $ 301,553 55,162 18,792 $375,507 $2,248,335 00 55.907 102,957 22,006 47,146 80,167 55,435 $2,611,953 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $122,674 for flood plain management services and $4,671 for related hydrologic studies. 35. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Beaver River, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Conemaugh, Nanty Glo. Mon River, WV (4 sites) Total Cost for Fiscal Year $23,358 650 37,697 15,604 $77,309 36. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 37. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Pleasant Crk, Wetland, Tygart River Lake $20,044 Coordination Acct Funds 12,475 Initial Appraisals, General 7,788 Total Cost for Fiscal Year $40,307 38. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Coordination Acct Funds Preliminary Restoration Plans Nine Mile Run. Allegheny Co, PA Total Cost for Fiscal Year $6,738 12,420 128,183 $147,341 18-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to 30 Sep Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 1999 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Monongahela New Work River, PA and WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 3. Tygart Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 4. Chartiers New Work Creek, PA Approp. Cost 5. Elkins,WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Johnstown, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 7. Punxsutawaney, New Work Ohio River Approp. Basin, PA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Saw Mill Run, PA New Work Approp. Cost 9. South Central, PA New Work Environmental Restoration Approp. Cost 10. Turtle Creek, New Work PA Approp. Cost 18,157,860 1 18,157,860 1 12,616,400 12,646,949 13,569,300 16,734,875 14,791,600 14,015,073 7,239,820 6,921,132 16,525,000 13,881,611 12,680,000 13,086,392 6,448,000 6,536,467 13,202,000 16,327,949 14,044,000 14,273,266 10,466,000 7,819,163 21,342,000 22,219,962 12,674,000 13,091,848 172,434,743 2 169,486,025 2 471,870,835 3 473,946,560 4 312,660,857 5 312,656,254 6 15,857,000 15,857,000 462,000 218,374 1,468,000 1,548,947 283 (10,000) 2,298 775,000 946,251 953,090 837,734 614,000 550,474 1,315,000 1,072,824 572,000 652,235 2,011,700 2,370,143 21,500,932 7 21,445,266 7 22,438,241 8 22,426,364 8 89,000 88,999 30,818,153 41 30,818,153 41 1,772,627 1,772,627 11,000 1,579 1,000 8,582 1,000 3,707 372,192 371,706 8,865,388 9 8,865,388 9 548,000 424,136 1,110,000 1,239,223 7,000 183,589 1,857,000 1,770,774 212,000 208,015 5,982,000 5,425,479 812,000 797,523 4,873,000 5,267,814 7,944,190 7,925,781 18,674,000 43 18,398,000 44 3,586,107 to 3,586,107 o10 72,000 156,946 1,950,000 783,406 4,501,000 6,882,554 14,000 75,019 500,000 69,322 3,500,000 1,183,075 265,000 472,866 13,000 6,801 20,000 293,645 10,000,000 1,367,763 (54,553) 2,569 3,000 4,029 41,000 194,109 13,000,000 13,555,603 1,668,597 11 1,662,792 11 561,000 557,076 37,035,000 42 17,580,226 42 26,680,799 38 26,680,799 38 18-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to 30 Sep Proiect Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 1999 11. WV&PA Flood Control, WV & PA Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 13 Conemaugh. River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 17. Lower Girard Dam, OH 18. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost 2,100,000 232,832 1,942,000 1,993,851 1,454,000 1,433,107 1,441,000 1,465,523 1,201,000 1,041,798 1,354,000 1,504,653 1,465,000 1,032,286 1,189,000 1,106,784 2,539,790 1,936,936 3,522,910 2,924,592 1,454,300 1,325,143 1,081,740 1,225,242 1,267,860 1,240,737 1,195,260 1,618,063 1,929,100 1,146,859 3,372,000 4,053,379 1,633,000 2,136,743 1,542,759 1,605,591 898,000 922,310 1,334,954 1,336,783 309,000 80,552 1,099,000 1,102,203 2,802,000 3,413,337 500,000 2,600,000 921,033 1,153,865 3,560,400 3,652,353 1,034,000 1,167,223 1,535,000 1,617,586 969,500 998,733 1,263,000 1,312,786 160,000 334,313 1,037,000 1,078,120 956,500 1,228,343 8,739,987 8,739,987 40,737,105 40,726,466 46,012,411 46,012,411 24,046,886 24,042,159 4,482,933 4,482,933 32,963,617 32,959,336 9,539,586 9,539,586 19,441,224 19,439,277 109,305,076 109,305,076 31,568,757 31,562,220 2,921,000 2,921,000 469,000 414,865 5,727,531 5,727,531 24,069,553 24,068,956 7,144,973 7,144,973 21,296,562 21,295,773 47,033 47,033 18-15 12 12 13 13 14 14 39 39 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 39 39 20 20 21 21 22 23 40 40 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TART1 1 Q_A CST A NflTIN ANCIA .T A T1.1iNT PrnU". J1C'U%1'1 r Uiiui ii 1' 17U 117/ 7 1 1iEnnn iVQO IVOQR Total Cost to 30 Sep WVQO 1000 20. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 21. Mosquito Creek, Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 22. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 23. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 24. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 25. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 26. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA 27. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 28. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 868,000 908,438 1,016,000 942,077 2,494,000 2,391,386 250,000 847,092 962,000 932,752 1,701,000 1,693,847 226,000 283,192 977,000 976,013 2,041,300 1,873,903 770,280 732,529 887,000 869,061 848,330 1,0.31,000 884,890 1,003,425 2,329,210 2,078,000 2,523,289 1,987,107 61,307 69,348 94,530 994,230 921,000 870,392 1,048,722 1,392,470 1,615,000 1,402,835 1,530,343 222,030 219,336 978,810 1,062,680 272,000 277,942 842,000 841,392 1,699,770 2,043,937 1,840,191 1,813,962 17,376,097 24 17,376,097 24 907,300 17,191,814 25 979,667 17,191,760 25 4,253,029 26 4,253,029 26 1,127,000 18,624,901 45 1,228,824 18,623,998 45 985,197 27 985,197 27 40,217,201 28 40,217,201 28 2,278,000 44,400,557 29 2,420,917 44,387,877 29 70,000 211,444,741 1,249 211,340,872 844,100 10,191,143 874,885 10,185,099 7,792,378 30 7,792,378 31 1,585,300 28,861,798 32 1,704,350 28,855,267 32 14,559,800 14,559,800 247,000 6,589,698 258,029 6,589,295 20,545,065 33 20,545,065 34 782,500 15,457,467 35 813,542 15,456,236 35 12,521,167 36 12,521,167 36 1,918,700 39,659,870 37 2,190,876 39,630,354 37 18-16 1 -i -t L L, . 1 l\ 1 1 -> \1 1-1 1L l111I1 Prniet PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $995,000 appropriated and expended for major maintenance at L/D's 2, 3 and 4. 3. Includes amounts appropriated to date for; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,231,400 for CG, $56,571,000 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original reconstruction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $118,829,653). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA - $86,640,200 for CG, $83,617,000 for IWTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $171,060,200). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $25,025,700 for CG and $37,748,000 for IWTF (Total $62,773,700). 4. Includes amounts expended to date on; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,203,792 for CG, $56,325,288 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original construction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $118,556,333). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA - $86,545,148 for CG, $87,526,258 for IWTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $174,874,406). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $34,098,665 for CG, $37,091,688 for IWTF (Total $71,190,353). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds, $462,000 appropriated to and $218,374 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program - CG; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $425,000 appropriated to and $424,493 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program O&M. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $7,679 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97 and $703,407 expended to date on M&O of dams. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds. Also includes $278,044 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $1,918 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97 and $697,646 expended to date on M&O of dams. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $6,795 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $1,133 appropriated to and expended on M&O of dams in FY 97, and $103,733 expended to date on M&O of dams. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,585,627.29 for new work contributed by local interest. 25.Includes $315,500 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $1,857 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $5,948 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $4,681 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 33. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Protective Em-ployment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $11,120 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 38. Includes $1,840,000 (non-Federal) original construction cost and an additional $4,205,000 (non-Federal) contributed and $4,180,720 (non-Federal) expended to date. 39. Includes $2,888 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97, and $698,616 expended to date on M&O of dams. 40. Includes $1,157 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97, and $103,757 expended to date on M&O of dams. 41. Includes $4,225,188 (non-Federal funds) contributed and expended to date. 42. Includes $285,000 (non-Federal) contributed funds and $252,971 (non-Federal) expended to date. 43. Includes $4,894,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $2,925,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 44. Includes $4,880,202 expended to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $2,824,695 expended to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 45. Includes $3,828 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 18-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 18-B See Dat Section Author in Text Act AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION e izing t Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19351 Aug 30, 19351 June 26, 19342 3. Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 Project and Work Authorized ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Documents Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 18-18 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 31, 1992 5. 7. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 9. Jun 28, 1938 AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) Project and Work Authorized Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $181,000,000. Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $53,600,000. Navigation improvements as follows: The project replaces the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raises the existing pool 2 by 5', constructs twin 84'x720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and eliminates Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. Authorized cost is $705,000,000. Cost of construction is to be paid equally from the general fund of the Treasury and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. Documents S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Water Resources Development Act of 1992; PL 102-580 Sec 101 H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. 18-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act Nov 17, 1986 Project and Work Authorized SAW MILL RUN Construction of local flood protection projects. Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Oct 12, 1996 Water Resources Development Act Of 1996 PL 99-622 11. Oct 31, 1992 12. OCT 12, 1996 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended SOUTH CENTRAL PA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Construction of local flood protection projects. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL Construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Water Resources Development Act of 1992 PL 102-580 Sec 313 Water Resources Development Act of 1992 PL 104-303 secretary 581 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 18-20 See Section in Text 10. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Section in Text 19. 20. 21. Date Authorizing Act Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Project and Work Authorized LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 18-21 Documents H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 22. 23. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act Act Project and Work Authorized Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 24. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a) H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. 18-22 See Section in Text Documents 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 1. 2. 3. Work Authorized PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) Project Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Buckhannon River, WV 12 Cheat River, WV 12 Pittsburgh Harbor, PA 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Cong., 1st Sess. 2. No Commerce reported. Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Doc. 467, 69th For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1934 1893 1895 1922 Cost to September 30, 1998 Operations and Construction Maintenance 197,000 5,500 12,997 110,663 133,940 81,613 TABLE 18-E Project and Statu Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Butler, PA DuBois, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittanning, PA, Part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) Salamanca, NY Turtle Creek, PA Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Section I Wellsville, OH, Section II Youngstown, OH Deferred: Benwood, WV Chartiers Creek, PA OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Oper is Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Mai 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1972 1998 1964 1956 1956 1976 1954 1998 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 1,556,181 4,464,607 674,664 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 385,494 628,888 2,880,535 22,500,079 789,093 483,910 157,633 3,621,134 81,028 26,592,965 1,895,000 289,000 75,000 534,000 910,000 130,000 2,000 44,400 698,000 597,000 14,900 353,000 26,000 72,000 465,000 4,180,720 323,000 113,000 152,200 4,225,188 18-23 ration and intenance REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) Project and Status For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Cost to September 30, 1999 Construction (Federal Cost) Non-Federal Cost Operation and Maintenance Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Burgettstown, PA Friendsville, MD Girty's Run, Millvale, PA Granville, PA Leetonia, OH Oil City, PA Oil City Ice Control Structures Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Slovan, PA Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA Wilmore, PA Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV Oakdale, PA Rouseville, PA Wallace, WV1 Weston Mills, Olean, NY Weston Mills, Portville, NY Reservoirs Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1964 1965 1986 1987 1986 1964 1981 1979 1972 1977 1. Lacks local support. 2. No longer economically justified. 18-24 183,072 364,208 83,129 41,529 2,655,934 75,908 89,299 43,595 3,927,792 1,591,436 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 2,021,852 96,853 132,464 22,500 35,900 2,200 701,722 3,000 17,200 25,000 9,000 24,600 86,200 1,300 6,800 14,127 1,642 11,035 50,100 52,100 2,873,799 u PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) 1 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' Bellaire, OH Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA' Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH Empire-Stratton, OH Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act Leetsdale, PA" Martins Ferry, OH 1 McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, 9H Moundsville, WV 1 Muddy Creek Danj, PA1 Neville Island, PA New Cumberland, WV New Kensington and Parnassus, PA' Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The (trip) Powhaten Pjint, OH Proctor, WV Redbank Cree Lake, PA Rochester, PA St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Uniontown, P Warwood, WV Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewrter, PA Wheeling, WV1 Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling) 1 Wheeling, VV(Wheeling Island)' Wilcox, PA Woodlands, WV1 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization)1 4 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-25 1975 1965 1972 1941 1977 1956 1954 1971 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Jct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17,1986 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17 ,1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17 ,1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 194 16,884 100,000 33,031 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 402,459 156,377 13,529 6,387 189,067 21,700 16,761 232,863 TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depth on Character Width able Lift at Pool Miter Sills at of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Normal Pool Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, Level' cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Fixed Ce 100 19342 $ 1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 13.8 734.8 10.8 11.8 Rock Pick Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 10.6 745.4 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 11.6 757.0 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.4 769.4 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.0 782.4 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 17.8 800.2 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22.0 822.2 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $ 15,630,637 Abandoned lock and daml 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 Abandoned lock and dam 3 310,103 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 Total $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. 00 ti 0 0 ro C 0 C 0 n3 y C TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W.V.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depth on Avail- Normal Miter Sills at Character Width able Lift at Pool Normal Pool of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Level' Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56 110 563 4 41.5 Charleroi, PA 563 -- 61.2 Maxwell locks 843 and dam, Maxwell, PA -- 82.2 Grays Landing 84 lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA -- 90.8 Point Marion 84 lock and dam, Point Marion, PA -- 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 and dam, Morgantown, WV -- 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV -- 115.4 Opekiska lock 842 and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV Marine ways, etc Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging channel Total 360 720 360 720 360 720 720 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile 8.2 726.9 11.6 11.9 Rock Crib Pile 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock 720 15.0 778.0 18.0 26.0 Rock Rock 720 19.0 797.0 16.2 16.2 Rock Rock 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Fixed Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Fixed Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19532 Concrete 100 19532 Concrete 100 19322 Concrete 100 19642 Concrete 83 1994 Concrete 10 19932 Concrete 100 19502 Concrete 100 19592 Concrete 100 19642 $54,785,997 57 26,926,153 58 29,031,467 56 30,110,889 5 174,874,407 9 118,620,523 4 5 8,778,000 5 12,506,829 s 25,179,622 s y 250,000 5 1,019,907 5 780,816 S 1,074,812 5 770,449 5 2,853,580 10 245,900 5 191,000 5 210,445 5 227,668 200,550 5 190,691 5 210,127 5 175,829 5 587,899 $489,803,560 00 C-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Funds Regular Maintenance and operation Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) Total New Work $489,803,56013 $489,803,5601 3 Operation and Maintenance, General $312,181,0822 452,623 22,549 $312,656,2542 Total $801,984,642 12 3 452,623 22,549 $802,459,81412 3 1. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 2. Includes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. BLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSB (See SE Tributary Basin and Reservoir 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of L/D 3; $166,026,462 for replacement of I/D 7 ($83,271,383 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund); and $109,552,616 for replacement of the lock at Point Marion Lock and Dam ($54,845,083 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund). URGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS ection 23 of Text) Total Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA Crooked Creek, PA East Branch Clarion River, PA Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY Loyalhanna, PA Mahoning Creek, PA Tionesta, PA Union City, PA Woodcock Creek, PA Beaver: Berlin, OH Michael J. Kirwan, OH Mosquito Creek, OH Shenango River, PA and OH Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Conemaugh River Crooked Creek Clarion River Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek Woodcock Creek Mahoning River Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Shenango River West Fork River Youghiogheny River $46,012,411 4,482,933 9,539,586 112,226,076 5,727,531 7,144,973 7,792,378 14,559,800 20,545,065 8,739,987 17,376,097 4,253,029 40,217,201 $211,340,872 2 12,521,167 1. Includes $2,921,000 for dam rehabilitation. 2. Actual cost. Latest cost estimate (1991) is $231,000,000. 18-28 TAI REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Bolivar, NY Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Burgettstown-Slovan, PA Butler, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Cannonsburg-Houston Reach James G. Fulton Reach Colliers, WV DuBois, PA Eldred, PA Etna, PA Friendsville, MD Granville, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittaning, PA Latrobe, PA Leetonia, OH Apr 1998 Oct 1999 May 1999 Apr 1999 Oct 1999 Jun 1999 Apr 1999 Apr 1998 Mar 1999 Nov 1998 Sep 1994 Oct 1998 Apr 1987 Mar 1998 Apr 1999 Apr 1999 May 1999 Apr 1997 Sep 1998 May 1998 Marianna, PA Millvale, PA Oil City Ice Control Structure, Allegheny River, PA Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgway, PA Salamanca, NY Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Turtle Creek, PA Washington, PA Wellsville, OH Weston, WV Wilmore, PA Youngstown, OH 18-29 Jun 1999 Mar 1998 May 1999 May 1999 Jun 1999 Oct 1999 Jun 1999 Apr 1998 May 1999 Jun 1999 Jun 1992 Oct 1998 Sep 1997 Apr 1999 Apr 1999 Sep 1998 Oct 1996 Oct 1998 May 1998 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Buckhannon River, Upshur County, WV Cheat River Basin FWS, WV Connellsville, PA Connoquenessing Cr, North Sewickley Twp. Coordination Account (Sec 205) Girty's Run, Millvale, PA Jackson Twp., Butler Co., PA Pigeon Creek, Monongahela, PA Seitz Run, Allegheny Co., PA W.Br. Tunungwant Cr, Bradford, PA Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: Fiscal Year Costs 3,435 24,765 2,143 7,885 82,602 17,785 8,073 28,559 12,877 16.332 $139,529 Emergency Streambank Protection - Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Access Road, Tygart Lake Allegheny River, First St., Ford City, PA Bear Creek, Walnut St., PA Friendsville, MD Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA Center Treatment Plant, Elkhorn Run, PA Conneaut Lake, PA Coordination Account (Sec 14) Diel South Road (Hwy 139 A) Mahoning Riv Kiskiminetas River, STP, Avonmore, PA Moon Treatment Plant, Elkhorn Run, PA Mononaghela River Water Street, Point Marion, PA Moundsville, Ohio River, WV Nickleplate Rd, French Creek, Fairfield Sewage Treatment Plant, Point Marion, PA Ten Mile Creek, Washingtion County, PA Fiscal Year Costs 14,191 30,938 10,293 379,911 143,587 13,657 47,107 20,757 4,888 11,617 15,254 9,502 219,591 26,109 10,483 14.432 Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: $972,317 18-30 OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point immediatelyupstreamfromNewMartinsville, WV, and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles frommile 127 to438 immediately upstreamfromFoster, KY, and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Robert C. Byrd, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland Locks and Dams, and Olmsted Locks and Dams (Replacement for 52 and 53). Improvements Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on O hio R iver ..................................................... ......... 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River ................................ 19-3 Tables Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement ............... 19-4 Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation........................ 19-5 Table 19-C Not Applicable Table 19-D Not Applicable Statistics............................................. 19-7 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous Projects. For details seepage 1907 ofAnnual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine Locks and Dams withan auxiliary lock at Robert C. Byrd being 110 by 1,200 feet. Dashields and McAlpine are fixed dams, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Robert C. Byrd are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in widthfrom600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by Table 19-E Not Applicable Table 19-F Not Applicable Table 19-G Not Applicable Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project ................................................. 19-6 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River .......................... 19-6 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and John T. Myers; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; 110-by 1,200-foottemporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110-by 1,200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, withreference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1,1935, under provisions ofPermanent Appropriations Repeal Act ofJune 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost ofnew work which includes Inland Waterways trust funds is $2,991,817,009; non-Federal cost is $465,914. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by John T. Myers Locks and Dam, and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Damproject. A December 1981 Act established the Falls ofthe Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity ofwildlife. ANovember 17, 1988 Act authorized a replacement structure for Locks & Dams 52 & 53 at Olmsted, IL. A November 28, 1990 Act authorized an interpretive center at the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks & Dam and a replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks & Dam, IN & KY. Table 19-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. Navigation system of 20 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 19-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization ofthese facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. Real estate acquisition is complete. The contract for the Locks was awarded in October 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Dam Rehabilitation was awarded in June 1993 and is 97.5 percent complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $373 million, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area Was authorized by 97-137 on December 29,1981 and modified by Public Law 101-640 on November 28, 1990 to design and construct an interpretive center. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired and one tract remains in a condemnation trial. A construction contract to construct the cost-shared recreation facilities was awarded on 30 September 1993, and completed in February 1995. 19-2 OHIO RIVER McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section ofrailroadbridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. A replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock with a new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock was authorized by WRDA of 1990inPublic Law 101-640. Constructionhas beeninitiated and has advanced to 10 percent completion through FY 1999. $26,670,024 has been expended for the lock replacement and ancillary efforts. Olmsted Locks & Dam: A replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 & 53 was authorizedbythe WRDA of 1988 in Public Law 100-676 on 17 November 1988. Planning Engineering and Design continued. A contract to construct the lock was awarded 6 December 1995 and has advanced to 80 percent completion. A contract to construct the approach wall was awarded 26 August 1999 for $98,980,610 and 1,190 calendar days to complete the work. InFY 99, $51,060,367 was expended on the Olmsted project. New Cumberland Locks and Dam: Effort during the FY included upgrading remote gate control systems; an indefinite delivery contract to fabricate tainter valve to fabricate floating mooring bitts; and renovate river wall filling valve. Pike Island Locks and Dam: Effort during the FY included upgrading remote gate control systems; and painting tainter gates, first option year; completion ofa dewatering auxiliary lock chamber which started in FY 98. Hannibal Locks and Dam: Effort during the FY included upgrading remote gate control systems. Emsworth Locks and Dam: Efforts during FY 99 included contract award for track beam replacement on Main and Back Channel Dams; continued repairs to the 100' miter gates at Poiree Dam at Emsworth; and repair lift gates on Main Channel. Dashields Locks and Dam: Efforts during FY 99 included renovation of river wall filling valve. Montgomery Locks and Dams: Efforts during FY 99 included dewatering ofauxiliary lock chamber; andrenovation ofriver wall filling valve. Operation and maintenance, general: Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $17,407,623 forHuntingtonDistrict, $22,291,266 for Louisville District and $16,165,596 forPittsburgh District. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles fromhead ofriver at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work; but, in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati, OH, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, KY (head offalls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, IN, and 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work is $16.16 million, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost ofthese items is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act ofJanuary 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd Sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,885,229. In FY 99 dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River totaled 14,100 cubic yards at $66,000. Dredging by contract: HuntingtonDistrict 647,750 cubic yards at $2,034,750. Louisville District 1,465,622 cubic yards at $4,063,582. 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Cost and Financial Statement See Section in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Total Cost To FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 (footnotes) 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost $47,746,000 $82,267,653 90,840,000 73,057,000 $2,138,604,761 13 5 0 17 21 65,860,939 82,495,874 90,492,313 73,941,293 2,136,839,026 13 611 12 15 16 18 22 23 53,311,000 56,903,026 49,786,050 54,060,851 1,167,270,549 2 4 19 53,785,905 58,600,008 49,562,113 55,864,485 1,166,959,315 2 13 14 19 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,125,000 5,636,283 6,250,100 6,571,448 5,969,560 5,549,421 5,737,473 7,261,154 82,972,138 82,972,138 33,914,252 33,914,252 15,962,260 8 15,962,260 8 175,647,119 7 9 175,633,178 944,649 944,649 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. Includes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve. Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. SExcludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 14 Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15 Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 16 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. "7 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. 'g Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 19 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 20 Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 21 Includes $378,788,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 22 Includes $377,912,450 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 2; Excludes $9,525,437 settlement from the U.S. Treasury Dept Judgement Fund. 19-4 Table 19-A OHIO RIVER Authorizing Legislation Project and Work Authorized March 3, 1827 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1958 Open Channel Work, Ohio River Project adopted by this act originally coy ered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Construct ice piers as a part of allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. Act of March 3, 1827, modified to include maintenance of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of river slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. Locks and Dams, Ohio River Act of December 29, 1981, established the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Act of November 17, 1988 authorized a replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 and 53 at Olmsted, Illinois. Act of November 28, 1990, modified PL 97-137 by authorizing an interpretive center at Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a estimated total cost of $3,200,000. Act of November 28, 1990 authorized a modernization of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky at a total cost of $219,600,000 with one-half appropriated from the Treasury and one-half from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Act of October 31, 1992 renamed the Gallipolis Locks and Dam to the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam. H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, 95 Stat. 1710 PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 102-580, 102nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 19-5 Table 19-B See Section in Text Date of Authorizing Act Documents December 29, 1981 November 17, 1988 November 28, 1990 November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1999 (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $2,044,441,851 $1,125,997,598 $116,886,390 $3,287,325,839 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 EmergencyRelief 1,198,837 19,000 0 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation 0 3,039,789 0 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 0 254,578 Executive 1963 0 0 0 0 Total $2,049,114,8683 $1,129,095,15312 $116,886,3904 $3,295,096,411 'Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under permanent 3 Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. indefinite appropriation. Includes $33,914,252 cost for O & M Rehabilitation. 'Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous projects. Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes of Table 19-A. Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses At Locks and Dams, Ohio River Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 License Public Service Co. of Indiana Annual Charge Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1999 Louisville Gas and Electric Co. $ 45,950.00 $ 95,000.00 $1,514,416.64 $9,290,353.94 Ohio Power Co. $ 64,232.00 $1,971,918.00 City of Vanceburg, Kentucky $ 261,103.00 $4,151,471.00 City of New Martinsville, WV -0- $197,589.03 19-6 Table 19-H Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles Distancefrom and Below Nearest Town Dam Pittsburgh Width of Greatest Length Chamber Available for (feet) Full Width (feet) Lift (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet,Mean sea level) Depth on Miter Sills Character of Foundation Upper Lower (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Actual Cost Year to Date of Percent Opened to Each Lock Complete Navigation and Dam 1 - Replaced 6.2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13 3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1 6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31 7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1 4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54 4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 84 3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 126 4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1 6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 161 7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2 7 miles above Waverly, WV 110 56 110 56 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 360 600 360 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1 ,200 600 1 ,200 600 1,200 600 180 7100 10.0 692 0 17 5 682.0 20 5 664.5 21 0 644 0 21 0 623 0 20 0 602 0 17 0 '4 12 9 Rock Rock and 15 5 ' ' 12 9 Piles 13 4' 16 0' 17 5' Rock Rock 14.6' Rock Rock and and Piles Piles - - -_ 7 0' 14 8' Rock Rock 17 0' 38 0 180' Rock Rock 17 0 Rock Rock 35 0 15 0 Rock Rock and Piles - - $ 870,034 100 1921 $ 43,347,635 2 14 - - 976,767 - - 1,144,588 100 1929 37,447,328 - - 1,071,472 - - 1,080,132 - - 1,123,442 100 1936 37,754,307 '6 - - 1,075,000 - - 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 - - 1,177,100 - - 1,138,000 - - 1,162,165 100 1968 56,623,946 - - 1,166,104 - - 1,222,389 - - 1,133,371 99 1972 87,902,000 1,180,478 1,275,532 100 1972 78,173,881 Table 19-J 9 10 11 12 13 14 o 0 Table 19-J (continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles Distancefrom Width of Greatest Length Lift Upper Depth on Miter Sills Character of Actual Cost and Below Nearest Town Chamber Available for Normal Foundation Year to Date of Dam Pittsburgh (feet) Full Width (feet) Pool Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet)Elevation (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam (feet) (feet,Mean sea level) - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0 3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237 5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1 5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279 2 Robert C Byrd Locks and Dam, 0 7 mile below Hogsett, WV Robert C. Byrd Modernization 1,362,591 927,091 1,213,848 936,696 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 110 1,200 22 0 582 0 37 0 15 0' Rock and Piles Rock 100 1968 62,591,255 - 1,484,562 - 1,218,798 - 1,851,488 22 0 560 0 18 0 15 0 Rock Rock and Piles 100 1971 64,922,680 - - 1,187,542 - - 1,925,205 - - 1,307,241 3,452,066 27 Rehab Dam and New Lock 27 - Replaced 28 - Replaced 29 - Replaced 30 - Replaced 341 0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4 9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436 2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2 2 miles above Foster, KY 110 110 110 110 I10 1I11 00 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 23 0 538 0 30 0 515 0 30 0 485 0 18 0 15 0 Rock Rock 18 0' 13 0 Rock Rock 180' 15 0 Rock Rock 100 1992 350,612,131 " - - 1,063,133 - - 1,088,802 - - 1,579,618 100 1959 57,464,191 - - 1,359,231 - - 2,951,216 - - 1,937,166 - - 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188,216 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 00 24 25 26 b C C x ~T1 0 0 0 V1 n r. y 7-d C 31 32 33 34 Table 19-J (continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles Distancefrom Width of Greatest Length Lift Upper Depth on Miter Sills Character of Actual Cost and Below Nearest Town Chamber Available for Normal Foundation Year to Date of Dam Pittsburgh (feet) Full Width Pool Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) Elevation (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam (feet,Mean seale vel) - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 531 5 Markland Locks and Dam, I mile above Markland, IN 110 110 1,200 600 35 0 455 0 50 0 15 0 Rock Piles - - 1,894,942 - - 3,704,535 - - 1,297,924 - - 2,857,040 100 1963 63,019,403 39 - Replaced 40 - Eliminated 41 - - Falls of the Ohio, I mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) - Eliminated - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 720 7 Cannelton Locks and Dam, 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776 1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 846 0 John T Myers Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY N/A N/A 1i10 110 600 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 37 0 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 N/A N/A 0 N/A 420 0 490 120 190 11 0 190 25 0 383 0 16 0 358.0 22 0 342 0 Rock Rock 11 0 38 0 13 0 Rock Rock 100 1961 - - 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202,890 100 1972 99,032,866 " 32 0 16 0 Rock Pile 99 1975 104,496,840 34 0 12 0 Rock Rock - - 4,415,526 - - 3,062,710 - - 3,325,964 99 1975 100,326,373 35 36 37 38 42 43 44 45 2,222,448 7,658,134 7 2,367,918 72,396,314 7x ', O 47 48 49 3,129,028 Table 19-J (continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles and Below Dam Pittsburgh Distancefrom Nearest Town Width of Chamber (feet) Greatest Length Available for Full Width (feet) Lift (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet,Mean sea level) Depth on Miter Sills Upper Lower (feet) (feet) Character of Foundation Year Percent Opened to Lock Dam Complete Navigation 50 - Replaced 5 1 - Replaced 918 5 Smithland Locks and Dam, 2 miles above Smithland, KY 52 938 9 I 4 miles below Brookport, IL 938 9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL (New lock) 964 4 Olmsted Locks & Dam at Olmsted, IL S53 962 6 10 8 miles above Mound O City, IL 962.6 10 8 miles above Mound City, IL (New lock) 974 2 Mound City Lock and Dam, I mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL 110 110 1,200 1,200 110 600 I 10 1,200 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 22 0 324 0 12 0 302 0 120 3020 210 3000 134 2900 134 2900 34 0 12.0 Rock Rock - - 3,571,762 - - 4,370,566 99 1980 273,725,471 15 4 11 0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747 " 15.4 11 0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 18.0 18 0 Pile Pile 12 2007 369,016,654 'K 15 4 9 6 ' Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240 12 15 4 9 6 Pile 100 1982 38,570,920 1,539,470 '" $2,246,712,011 2) 'Depths are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths 2 Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938 SDepths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. Land chamber 5 River chamber 6 Roller-gate dam Cost not included in total Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. SLock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921 Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928 Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30 Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960 Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971 SExistinstgr uctures are complete except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge Construction of the new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock has not yet begun 'Dam below not yet constructed Depth on lower miter sill at lower water o Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978 "Major rehabilitation ($8,876,000) initiated in FY 79 is complete 42 Major rehabilitation ($4,593,572) initiated in FY 79 is complete 3 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972 No longer considered authorized (See Section 1 of Text) 4 Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 84 " Includes $33,914,252 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 90 (O&M funds). 16 Includes $33,016,696 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 89. " Includes $180,086,307 Inland Waterways Trust Funds ' Includes $184,517,386 Inland Waterways Trust Funds SIncludes $13,308,757 Inland Waterways Trust Funds 21 Exclusive of $7,013,405 details below Additonal Festures Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under previous project). Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous Waterfront Development at Huntington, WV (Greenup Pool) Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam. $5,359,203 966,232 19,170 668,800 Total 7,013,405 Grand Total $2,253,725,416 Actual Cost to Date of Each Lock and Dam 0 0 0 r-l b C 0 o Co BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT * The District comprises northern OH, northwestern PA and western and northern NY, embracing U.S. waters of lake Erie exclusive of a small portion of the western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundaries between the states of OH and MI to international boundary line east of Frontier, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Ashtabula Harbor, OH Barcelona Harbor, NY Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Buffalo Harbor, NY Buffalo Hbr Environmental Dredging Cattaraugus Creek Harbor, OH Cleveland Harbor, OH Conneaut Harbor, OH Dunkirk Harbor, NY Erie Harbor, PA Fairport Harbor, OH Huron Harbor, OH Irondequoit Bay, NY Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Lorain Harbor, OH Oak Orchard, NY Olcott Harbor, NY Oswego Harbor, NY Owasco Outlet, Auburn, NY Port Clinton, OH Put-In-Bay Harbor, OH Rochester Harbor, NY Rocky River, OH Sandusky Harbor, OH Sturgeon Point, NY Toledo Harbor, OH Touissaint River, OH Vermilion Harbor, OH West Harbor, OH Wilson Harbor, NY Page 20-2 20-2 20-2 20-3 20-4 20-4 20-4 20-5 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-7 20-7 20-7 20-7 20-8 20-8 20-9 20-9 20-9 20-9 20-10 20-10 20-10 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-12 20-12 FLOOD CONTROL 35. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 36. Reno Beach, OH URBAN STORM WATER MGMT 37. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge, NY Page 20-13 20-14 20-14 TABLES Table 20-A Cost and Financial Statement 20-15 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation 20-23 Table 20-C Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 20-39 Table 20-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects 20-40 Table 20-E Other Authorized Shore Protection (Formerly called "Beach Erosion Control") Projects 20-41 Table 20-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 20-42 Table 20-G De-authorized Projects 20-43 Table 20-H Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 20-45 Table 20-I Formerly Used Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) 20-45 Table 20-J General Investigations 20-46 Table 20-K Work Under Special Authorities 20-47 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 31. Lake Erie-Cooley Canal- Lucas, OH 32. New York State Canal System 33. Rochester Harbor, NY (Wave Surge) 34. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA NAVIGATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 20-12 20-12 20-13 20-13 20-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES NAVIGATION 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal Facilities. There are sixteen piers and wharves. Coast Guard owns one facility. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on south side of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental activities cost $15,710, real estate support cost $15,946, project condition surveys cost $24,889, dredging studies cost $3,803, coastal mapping cost $33,737. The U.S. Derrickboat McCauley repaired 20 1.f. of the west breakwater and cost $9,229. $312,751 was expended on the Ashtabula River Partnership effort. The partnership is comprised of local, private and government agencies to address remediation of contaminated sediments in the Harbor and Ashtabula River system. Effort continues for a Comprehensive Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (CMP/EIS) regarding dredging and construction of a new Upland Disposal Facility for toxic and non-toxic sediments. 2. BARCELONA HARBOR, NY Location: On the south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles southwesterly of Dunkirk, N.Y. and 29 miles northwesterly of Erie, PA (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous Projects. Adopted by July 4, 1936, River and Harbor Act. Only information available is in index to report of Chief of Engineers under title "Portland Harbor, N.Y." Existing Project. For description of existing project see page 1506 of Annual Report for 1961. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $1,124,286. Local interests incurred Non- Federal costs of $60,000. Of this amount, $7,500 was a cash contribution and remainder was for providing necessary lands and construction of a public wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 7 8 th Cong., 2 nd sess.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $7,500. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $4,520, supervision and administration cost $11,303, and dredging cost $449,565 to remove approximately 40,000 cubic yards of shoaled material. 3. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY AND Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, NY, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, NY. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, NY, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, NY and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous Projects. For details see items 5 and 7, pg. 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see pg. 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was de-authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was de-authorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by NY State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, 20-2 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY on Apr 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal Facilities. Two facilities are along the upstream end of the channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, NY, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock that is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: The lock was in operation 291 days and closed for annual winter maintenance from January 1, 1999 through April 13,1999. The U.S. Derrickboat McCauley accomplished ordinary maintenance and repair of structure and grounds throughout the year. Total costs of $3,549,008 were distributed as follows: Operation and care of lock and ordinary maintenance and repair cost $615,485. Real estate support cost $11,274; project condition surveys cost $16,247; Water control management cost $17,431; and recovery operations cost $56,587. Maintenance included $1,790,626 for continuation of the rehabilitation of the upper east wharf wall; $434,549 for the pump house; $1,902,530 for the lower east guide wall; $511,868 for the lower west guide wall; $102,502 to de-water the lock; $80,066 for safety implementation structural measures; $15,435 for the upper east guide wall; $132,978 to rehab the west lockmaster office; $127,960 for the west storage house; $132,960 for the west operating house; $61,209 for the east operating house; $132,631 to rehab the east lockmaster office; $127,924 for the east metal storage house; $30,800 for subsurface investigations; $99,900 for clearing and snagging; $489,760 for gate painting; supervision and administration cost $177,860; and miscellaneous maintenance cost $35,469. A credit of $3,555,041, of previously expensed costs, was capitalized to reflect rehabs done to the lock. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on Dec 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are 27 piers, wharves, and docks of which five are on the Outer Harbor, nine are on the Lackawanna, Union, and Buffalo Ship Canals, and thirteen are located along the deep-draft section of the Buffalo River. Gateway Metroport, Division of Gateway Trade Center, Inc., owns and operates, for the former Bethlehem Steel Corp., wharves at Lackawanna for the receipt and shipment of general cargo and bulk commodities. Buildings of the former steel plant are utilized for transit and longterm storage of cargo as required. The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority owns Terminals A and B in the Outer Harbor used for handling general cargo. Twenty terminals have railroad connections. The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring the city fireboat. Coast Guard facilities are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $66,088, real estate support cost $9,994, project condition surveys cost $107,562, dredging studies cost $3,000, supervision and administration of contracts cost $15,388, water control management cost $16,330. Dredging cost $972,188 for removal of 226,000 cubic yards of shoaled material. Dredging contract to be finalized in FY 00. Work performed using the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $277,426. The work included repairs to 50 l.f. of the South Breakwater, Dike 4, snagging and clearing the Buffalo River, and clearing out the culverts at Bird Island Pier. 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES 5. BUFFALO HARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING Location: The eastern end of Lake Erie at the head of the Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. Previous Projects: None Existing Project: An outer harbor, about 4-1/2 miles long and 1,600 feet wide, formed by a breakwater system, approximately parallel to the lake shore, 22,718 feet in length, with entrances near north and south ends and one confined disposal facility. A west breakwater 1,800 feet long located in Lake Erie protecting the north entrance. The inner harbor consists of a south pier at the mouth of the Buffalo River, about 5.8 miles of Federal Channel in the Buffalo River, and a 2-mile channel in the Buffalo Ship Canal. Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities: There are 13 wharves and docks located along the deep-draft section of the Buffalo River. Grain storage facilities, a cement transfer operation and a fuel storage/transfer operation are found along the Buffalo River on both banks. The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring the city fireboat. Coast Guard facilities are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: $80,169 in Federal funds was expended to formulate a decision document addressing application of Section 312 environmental dredging authorities, impacts to navigation, and identifying potential areas for ecosystem restoration. 6. CATTARAUGUS CREEK HARBOR, OH Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, NY and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost of new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 R&H Act (H.Doc. 97, 9 0 th Cong., 1 st sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were adjusted downward by nine dollars. 7. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see pg. 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88). For details of the commercial navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-4 of the Annual Report for 1995. For details of the recreational navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-3 of Annual Report for 1994. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY 88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. A portion of the project was de-authorized by the Intermodel Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $33,852,100 (Oct 1991) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is for new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is $13,740,000 (Oct 1991) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B. & O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and 20-4 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of the Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) authorized the Corps to begin a Reconnaissance study of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and safety of the public. Preliminary plans were studied to alleviate the commercial navigation problem and inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study was $250,000. The Reconnaissance Report recommended a feasibility study for one plan which has three structural features and the potential for yielding commercial (priority) outputs. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility phase of the study. Therefore, the study was reclassified as "inactive". See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. A confined disposal facility (CDF) (Dike 10B) was constructed adjacent to the Burke Lakefront Airport for containment of dredged material from Cleveland Harbor. The rubble mound structure was designed to hold material unsuitable for open-lake disposal. The sixty-eight (68) acre site should provide sufficient CDF capacity for approximately twenty years. The project was constructed with Federal O&M funds at a cost of $17,500,000 and was completed in 1998. Terminal Facilities. Fifty-one piers, wharves, and docks are situated in the Port of Cleveland. Eleven are located in the east and west basins of the outer harbor; 7 along the banks of the Old River and 17 and 16 along the right and left banks of the Cuyahoga River, respectively. Twenty-two terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. The city of Cleveland owns and operates a wharf for mooring the city fireboat. U.S. Coast Guard vessels are moored east of the foot of 9th Street in the east basin. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $29,970; real estate support cost $16,260; project condition surveys cost $135,850; coastal mapping cost $$134,848; supervision and administration cost $123,002; FY 98 dredging finalization cost $96,165; FY 99 dredging cost $1,544,132 to remove approximately 333,369 cubic yards of shoaled material; dredging studies cost $16,321. Construction finalization for CDF Site 10B cost $401,571. $147,768 was expended to assess the structural integrity of Dike 14 and to investigate alternative repair plans. $1,511,630 was expended to rehabilitate the southerly portion of the East Pier (Dock 20) and the north end of the West Pier. Repairs consist of new-anchored steel sheet pile bulkhead for the entire 832-foot length of Dock 20 and a concrete cap overlay on the north end of the West Pier. $670,661 was expended to repair 400 l.f. of the East and West Arrowhead Breakwaters, the West-end Breakwater of the West Basin, and snagging and clearing using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen. E&D, plans and specs to repair the East Breakwater cost $124,412. Non-Federal cost was $1,364,012 to extend 3 combined storm water and sewer overflow utility pipes. 8. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. For completed work, non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. The most southerly 300 feet of the 1,670 foot long shore arm, authorized by the R&H Act of 1910, was de-authorized Oct. 96. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical - handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $32,335; project condition surveys cost 28,154; real estate support cost $3,000; coastal mapping cost $33,882; supervision and administration cost $13,887; FY 98 dredging finalization cost $8,299; FY 99 dredging cost $694,605 to remove 144,000 cubic yards of shoaled material. 50 l.f. of the East Breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $112,975. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES 9. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $6,929; project condition surveys cost $19,208; real estate support cost $5,901; supervision and administration cost $25,371; dredging cost $299,111 to remove 17,419 cubic yards of shoaled material. 10. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Projects. For description see pgs. 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. The FY 93 Appropriations Act (PL102-377) authorized the planning, design and dredging of an access channel and berthing area. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was de-authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 Act was deauthorized in Nov 1981. A portion of work authorized by 1960 Act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was de-authorized in Aug 1982. Non- Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which twelve are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for supervision and administration cost $3859; real estate support cost $4,254; project condition surveys cost $3,649; dredging studies cost $985; finalizing the FY 98 dredging cost $2,175. 11. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 1526 of Annual Report for 1962. Total Federal cost of $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project. Total non-Federal cost is $101,000 for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. See pg. 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Act of 1927. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. Coast Guard owns one facility. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for real estate support cost $3,065; project condition surveys cost $11,683; E&D for the East Pier repair cost $127,441; environmental studies cost $10,447; economic studies cost; $9,775, coastal mapping cost $33,879. 100 1.f. of the East Breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $661,079. 20-6 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 12. HURON HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous Project. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and pg. 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act was de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $32,895; project condition survey cost $31,005; real estate support cost $242; finalizing FY 98 dredging cost $42,288; coastal mapping cost $5,214; miscellaneous structure repair cost $50; FY 99 dredging cost $584,924 to remove 152,737 cubic yards of shoaled material. 13. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Location. On south shore of lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, NY at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, NY (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing Project. For details of existing project, see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for FY 87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct 1994) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the COE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local Cooperation. The Buffalo District has a Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were adjusted downward by $17.00. 14. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work included a $1,287,528 contract for the rehabilitation of Little Sodus Bay East Breakwater. Approximately 1, 600 lineal feet of parallel steel sheet pile encasement was placed around the deteriorated existing concrete and wooden crib breakwater. The breakwater was capped off with a concrete walkway. Supervision and administration costs amounted to approximately $105,000. All costs incurred were Federal. Local Cooperation. Not required. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs were $2,453. 15. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous Projects. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization, authorized by 1960 Act and modified by 1965 Act was de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers were also de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. Total non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local interests towards construction of west shore arm. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized construction of commercial 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct 1989). This portion of the project has been classified deferred. On Mar 12, 1986, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small boat harbor that was completed in Jul 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubble mound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 Act (and modified by 1965 Act) is deauthorized. All other conditions fully complied with. On Mar 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, OH signed the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA), for the Section 107 project. For details see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. For details of LCA for deferred project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see pgs. 32-9 of Annual Report for FY 87. Terminal Facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on the outer harbor and the remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $2,861; Lorain Lighthouse contract finalization cost $88,293; real estate support cost $1,276; project condition surveys cost $19,176; coastal mapping cost $16,735; dredging studies cost $11,052; FY 98 dredging finalization cost $187,748; O&M Manual cost $9,891; subsurface investigation cost $43,907. 120 1.f. of the West Breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen and cost $310,432. 16. OAK ORCHARD, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of completed existing project see pg. 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (Jul 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal Facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were adjusted downward by $23.00. 17. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek, about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide optimum harbor protection, a stone jetty and recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, walkways and guardrail, access facilities, sanitary facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the authorized modification is $17,300,000 (Oct 1991) of which $8,860,000 is Federal and $8,440,000 is non-Federal. Modification of the existing project was authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will require local interests to pay 50% of project cost including lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas. They are also responsible for construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary facilities, and necessary access roads. 20-8 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT After construction, non-Federal responsibilities would include fishing facility maintenance, except for the aids to navigation. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. New Work: $707 was expended for in-house feasibility effort. 18. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Locations. On South shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 Act, was de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 Act, was de-authorized in May 1981. The portion of the Federal Channel from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge upstream to the northernmost alignment of Lake Street bridge authorized by the 1910 R&H Act as amended by the 1935 R&H Act, was de-authorized Oct 96. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves in the harbor and along the river channel. The Port of Oswego owns and operates a general cargo terminal at the mouth of the Oswego River. The Port Authority also operates a grain elevator west of the mouth of the river. The U.S. Coast Guard moors patrol and environmental research vessels west of the mouth of the river. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $13,396; project condition surveys cost $29,273; real estate support cost $6,331; supervision and administration cost $16,792; dredging cost $182,042 to remove 48,935 cubic yards of shoaled material. 19. OWASCO OUTLET, AUBURN, NY Location. The project is located on Owasco Outlet, in the Oswego River Basin at Auburn, N.Y., in the towns of Fleming and Owasco, Cayuga County, N.Y. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Auburn, N.Y. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1538 of Annual Report for 1960. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interest contributed. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: $263,848 in Federal funds was expended to provide assistance to Cuyaga County, NY in designing the Owasco Lake Seawall Rehabilitation Project, evaluating impacts on the existing federal flood control project at the Outlet, providing technical support for permit and environmental issues, and preparing plans and specifications for seawall rehabilitation contract advertisement. 20. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OH Location: Comprises lower half-mile of Portage River. River empties into Lake Erie 72 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14820). Existing Project. Provides for parallel jetties at river mouth and a channel in Lake Erie and Portage River with a project depth of 10 feet. For additional details, see pg. 1899 of Annual Report for 1951. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal Facilities.. A total of 11 docks exist; one public fish dock, one private sand dock, one private fuel dock, one lumber dock, one coal dock and five private docks. The Village of Port Clinton owns a dock at the foot of Madison Avenue that is open to the public. A shipyard builds small boats. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were adjusted downward by $26.00. 21. PUT-IN BAY HARBOR, OH Location. Located on the north side of South Bass Island approximately 5 miles due north of Port Clinton, OH. Approximately 60 miles west of Cleveland, OH and 40 miles east of Toledo, OH. Existing Project. Provides for a channel of varying width, not exceeding 225 feet, and 14 feet deep from that depth in lake to a point 150 feet west of Fox Wharf. Thence 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep along harbor frontage to vicinity of Miller's Wharf, a distance of 1,600 feet, provided that no dredging is 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES done by United States closer than 25 feet to existing structure. Existing project was completed in 1939. Cost of completed project was $51,609. Terminal Facilities. Dock facilities for the recreational boat users on the municipal dock. Island ferry service docks from South Bass Island to Port Clinton, OH. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $55,593, dredging cost $31,765 to dredge 934 cubic yards of shoaled material. 22. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & OH coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of Jul 14, 1960. Terminal Facilities. There are 3 docks at Rochester Harbor. The city of Rochester owns an 830-foot long wharf at the entrance to the Genesee River. Three storage buildings at the terminal, formerly used as transit sheds, have approximately 100,000 square feet of storage space. Approximately 3 acres of open storage area is located at the upper end of the facility. The facility has not been used for handling cargo for over 10 years. The U.S. Coast Guard moors search and rescue vessels at the mouth of the Genesee River. Another private facility is located 1.6 miles above the Stutson Street Bridge. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $31,713; project condition surveys cost $41,070; supervision and administration cost $36,173; dredging cost $896,989 to remove 295,468 cubic yards of shoaled material. 23. ROCKY RIVER, OH Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description see pg. 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343.494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $15,955; project condition surveys cost $28,521; real estate support cost $6,056; supervision and administration cost $18,318; dredging cost $461,415 to remove 44,281 cubic yards of material; $34,161 was expended to initiate design, plans and specifications on the East Pier. 24. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeastern portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous Project. For description see pgs. 1511- 12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepening channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $22,602; project condition surveys cost $52,483; real estate support cost $622; coastal mapping cost $22,581; dredging studies cost 20-10 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT $13,912; supervision and administration cost $55,946; dredging cost $732,083 to remove 235,585 cubic yards of shoaled material. 25. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of Dunkirk, NY. )See Geological Survey map of Angola, NY.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 20-11 of Annual Report for 1991. Federal project cost is $ 1,460,000. Non-Federal project cost is $1,475,000. In addition, the local sponsor provided associated costs for upland development of $1,000,000. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Evans, NY, signed Oct 26, 1987. Operations and results During FY. Maintenance: $17,063 was incurred for sand by-pass reimbursement. 26. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-18 and 32-19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty-five piers, wharves and docks are located in the Port of Toledo. Seven are located on Maumee River; and 28 are equally divided along the right and left banks of the lower 7 miles of the Maumee River. The Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority Facility No. 1 Wharf handles conventional and containerized general cargo as well as an increasing amount of miscellaneous bulk materials. Fifteen of the terminals have railroad connections and mechanical handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 44, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $104,145; project condition surveys cost $272,341; real estate support cost $22,608; dredging studies cost $2,000; supervision and administration cost $186,440; dredging cost $3,136,491. 313,838 cubic yards of material were removed from the Maumee Bay and 1,011,630 cubic yards of material were removed from the Maumee River. Costs to continue the Long-Term Management Strategy were $512,740. These costs included the cost of developing and implementing a mutually acceptable and comprehensive sampling and testing plan to conduct EPA-required scientific studies. These studies included toxicity, bioaccumulation biological effects and chemical analyses of sediment and water over 26 miles of lake and river channels. Other work efforts were field application of innovative technologies that restored 1.4 million cubic yards of storage capacity in the existing confined disposal facilities, thereby expanding the useful life of these facilities. Miscellaneous other works performed included regular leachate testing and surveys for estimating restored capacity. 27. TOUSSAINT RIVER, OH Location. At weekly end of Lake Erie, 8 miles west of Port Clinton and 22 miles east of Toledo, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847) Existing Project. For description of existing project, pg 20-12 of annual Report for 1991. See table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Project is deferred due to discovery of unexploded ordnance in he dredging area. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a property executed Local Cooperation Agreement with Carroll Twsp., OH, signed April 3, 1991. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $54,739; supervision and administration cost $22,277; dredging cost $325,631 to remove 44,281 cubic yards of shoaled material. Non-Federal cost was $77,625 for Utilization Inspections. 28. VERMILION HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non- Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. A reconnaissance study to alleviate the ice-jam and free-flow flooding of the river was completed in 1986 at a cost of $180,000. The proposed project was an ice-retention structure. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility study; the project was therefore reclassified as "inactive". Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were reduced by $7.00. 29. WEST HARBOR, OH Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northwest of Port Clinton, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local Cooperation. See pg. 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated Jan 31, 1978, State of OH stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on Mar 9, 1981. Terminal Facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were adjusted downward by $6,419. 30. WILSON HARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve- Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pg. 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 that includes cost of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs is for work required for 1968 R&H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were adjusted downward by $124. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 31. LAKE ERIE - COOLEY CANAL - LUCAS, OH Location: On the south shore of Lake Erie, approximately 12 miles east of Toledo, Ohio and 14 miles west of Port Clinton, Ohio. Existing Project: The project consists of two breakwaters, the west is 1,400 feet long and the east is 250 feet long. Also, included in the project is dredging a navigation channel to a depth of-4 LWD. The Federal cost of the project is $2,197,000 and the non-Federal share is $244,100. Local Cooperation: The Buffalo District has properly executed a Project Cooperation Agreement with Lucas County, Ohio, signed 27 October 1997. Operation and Results during FY. New Work: Federal funds of $61,222 were incurred for construction, $13,739 for supervision and administration, and $12,200 for engineering and design. Non-Federal funds of $1,276,533 were incurred for construction, $135,129 for supervision and administration and $146,243 for engineering and design. 32. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM Location: The New York State Canal System runs primarily east west through New York State. It consists of 4 components: Erie Canal, Oswego Canal, Cayuga/Seneca Canal, and Champlain Canal. Existing Project: Reimburse the State of New York 50% of non-Federal operation, maintenance and rehabilitation costs as well as make capital improvements. Existing project was authorized by Sec. 1105, WRDA 1986 and Sec. 553, WRDA 1996 and Sec 341, WRDA 1999. Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities: Numerous piers, wharves and locks used for recreational craft. 20-12 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Operations and Results during FY. New work $3,750,616 was expended for Reconnaissance Report/Decision Document and to reimburse the State of NY for completed project. 33. ROCHESTER WAVE SURGE, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815). Existing Project. Project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, as authorized by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. The recommended plan of improvement consists of a partial segmented rubble mound lining of the interior walls of the existing piers. Total estimated Federal cost of the project is $3,850,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $3,850,000. Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the City of Rochester, on Feb 27, 1996. Operations and Results during FY. New Work: Due to balancing of Federal and non-Federal cost, FY 99 Federal costs were a credit of $466 for real estate activities, $212,529 for construction contract, $29,725 for contract supervision and administration and a credit of $6,252 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were a credit of $212,529 for construction, a credit of $4,391 for contract supervision and administration, $544 for real estate activities and $111,054 for engineering & design. SHORE PROTECTION 34. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Local Cooperation Agreement between the United States of America and the local sponsor for construction of the 58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary of the Army on Jun 22, 1989. See pg. 20-10 of Annual Report for FY 89 for details of local cooperation. Operations and Results during FY. New Work: Annual nourishment for a fifty-year period, beginning in FY 93, continued in FY 99 for the eighth year of this fifty-year period. Federal expenditures were $565,162 for the nourishment contract, $57,237 for contract supervision and administration and $133,432 for in-house engineering and design. Non-Federal costs were $795,908 for the nourishment contract, $312 for contract supervision and administration, and $23,559 for in-house engineering and design. Location. At Erie, PA, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 102 miles east-northeast of Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see pg. 32-14 of Annual Report for FY 87. Actual Federal cost for the authorized beach nourishment project modifications through FY 92 is $16,879,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $11,233,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications through FY 92 is $8,798,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $4,815,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRDA was completed in FY 91. The estimated Federal cost (Oct 1999) for the 55 breakwaters project is $66,335,000. This estimate includes $13,435,000 for the initial construction and $52,900,000 for 50 years of post-construction beach nourishment. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1999) for the breakwater project is also $66,335,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of PA, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on Feb 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRDA Act. A FLOOD CONTROL 35. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, NY. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, NY. (See ecological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, NY). Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized by 1944 Flood control Act, see pg. 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition, $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES Local Cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal Funds for the operation of the dam, reservoir and service facilities, real estate support, water control support, flood emergency report, and miscellaneous reports were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $1,281,745. Maintenance costs for the dam were $1,697,253. This cost includes $1,200,805 for the access road bank stabilization and $232,232 to finalize the FY 98 and FY 99 debris removal contracts. 36. RENO BEACH HOWARD FARMS, OH Location. Area is located in Lucas County on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 20-14 of Annual Report for 1991. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed with the local sponsor on Jul 22, 1988 and by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on Sep 30, 1988. Availability of lands, easements, and rights-ofway was received on Jun 5, 1990 from the local sponsors. A decision was reached with the local sponsors on credit for LERRD's based on independent appraisals and the amount of cash contribution, on Apr 23, 1997. Operations and results during FY. New Work: Miscellaneous costs of $387 were incurred. URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 37. ONONDAGA STORM WATER DISCHARGE, NY Location. Onondaga Lake is located in Central NY State, northwest of the city of Syracuse, within the Oswego River Basin, which is tributary to Lake Ontario. It is also part of the NY State Barge Canal System. (See Geological Survey map of Syracuse, NY.) Existing Project. Existing project is authorized under Section 307 of the Waters Resources Development Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-580) and will demonstrate the effectiveness of using swirl concentrator system technology for combined Sewer Overflow abatement at Hiawatha Boulevard to improve water quality in Onondaga Lake. The project has three separate components: interceptor sewers; a treatment and storage facility; and out fall pipe and force main which will be designed and constructed by others. Federal cost will be $3,406. Non-Federal cost is estimated to be $3,786. Local Cooperation. The project will be costshared 75% Federal, 25% non-Federal up to the maximum Federal contribution ($4,000,000). Operations and Results during FY. New Work: Federal costs for FY 99 were $107 for real estate activities, $116,179 for in-house engineering effort, $793,704 for contract activities, $2,962 for reconnaissance effort, $23,463 for supervision and administration of the contract, and $45,065 for HTRW Activities. Non-Federal costs were $83,024 for in-house engineering effort, $79,214 for supervision and administration of the contract, $1,700,151 for contract activities, and $15,482 for HTRW activities. 20-14 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 NAVIGATION 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Barcelona Harbor, NY (Contributed Funds) 3. Black Rock Channel Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Contributed Funds) 4. Buffalo Harbor, NY 5. Buffalo Harbor, NY, Environmental Dredging New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New work Contrib New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost 421,196 390,600 359,370 429,161 393,325 348,806 411,713 416,065 465,388 465,388 12,805,339' 12,805,339 1 17,682,916 17,675,864 6,077,000 6,077,000 1,185,853 1,185,853 2,395,565 2,395,565 174,000 174,000 11,135,120 2 11,135,1202 3,591,548 3,491,845 4,246,500 3,473,867 64,015,148 3,546,506 3,507,832 4,274,097 3,549,008 63,992,371 3 620,000 620,000 611,850 1,198,891 613,471 1,151,193 23,115,187 4 23,115,187 4 1,388,869 1,462,041 66,300,344 5 1,448,168 1,467,976 64,873,040 5 295,457 295,457 123,000 28,373 (12,374) 80,169 110,626 108,542 Includes $565 for previous projs. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2 Includes $58,027 for previous projs. 3 Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming & budgeting system Jul 1, 1953 by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations & cost under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4 Includes $4,277,586 for previous projs. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized be Sec. 107. 5 Includes $1,883,647 for previous projs. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 6. Cattaraugus Creek, Harbor, OH New Work Approp New Work Cost (9) 317,711 317,711 (Contributed Funds) 7. Cleveland Harbor, OH (Contributed Funds) 8. Conneaut Harbor, OH 9. Dunkirk Harbor, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Contrib New Work Cost Maint Contrib Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 2,566,529 2,566,529 5,390,500 14,615,585 5,440,472 14,427,160 9,695,600 9,061,717 36,550,299 6 36,550,299 6 4,108,972 209,321,240 4,952,590 209,255,969 7 16,404,903 16,404,903 1,127,000 2,240,000 3,077,000 1,150,000 158,089 2,225,484 3,768,714 1,364,012 661,150 26,314 47,200 649,436 72,904 40,150 349,800 176,752 367,900 262,101 240,818 364,669 1,083,178 1,083,178 7,744,000 7,635,660 8,346,641 8 8,346,641 8 920,124 15,166,645 9 927,137 15,166,610 9 651,850 651,850 324,332 356,519 3,010,024 10 3,010,024 10 5,040,173 5,040,172 1,950,000 11 1,950,000 11 6 Includes $1,564,154 for previous projs. & appropriation & cost of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. SIncludes appropriations & cost under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96X5125 Maintenance and Operations of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8 Includes $805,272 for previous projs. 9 Includes $39,784 for previous projs. o1In0c ludes $811,250 for previous projs. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. "Includes $176,520 for previous projs. 20-16 Maint. Approp Maint Cost 17,411 18,008 4,804,060 4,804,060 19,772 19,772 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 10. Erie Harbor, PA 11. Fairport Harbor, NY 12. Huron Harbor, OH (Contributed Funds) 13. Irondequoit Bay, NY (Contributed Funds) 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 878,000 5,449,736 (689,605) 519,631 899,173 3,999,053 461,800 2,187,663 324,300 329,964 2,022,725 526,685 1,226,875 789,311 681,900 1,229,989 815,841 650,780 23,356 23,104 3,597,873 12 3,597,873 12 (8,264) 23,638,537 13 14,923 23,637,531 13 1,154 1,154 2,959,611 14 2,959,611 14 767,678 21,322,760 857,370 21,317,384 5,103,795 15 5,103,795 15 665,734 22,835,224 696,618 22,834,923 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 (17) 341 230,567 1,283,713 186,200 219,860 1,280,153 198,520 (264) 2,452 3,535,651 3,535,651 651,145 651,145 2,718,077 2,718,077 301,394 16 301,394 16 5,590,443 5,590,443 742,822 742,822 12 Includes $736,967 for previous projs. s Includes $104,900 for previous projs. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14 Includes $368,940 for previous projs. 'S Includes $269,789 for previous projs. 16 Includes $232,328 for previous projs. 20-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 15. Lorain Harbor, OH (Contributed Funds) 16. Oak Orchard, NY 17. Olcott Harbor, NY 18. Oswego Harbor, NY 19. Owasco Outlet, Auburn, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost 2,334,900 869,026 1,590,930 2,089,375 1,164,182 1,356,728 22,240,670 17 22,240,670 17 459,130 38,423,279 691,371 38,419,435 845,551 845,551 563 161,063 (22,600) 573 135,949 2,491 3,223 3,005 4,735 8,051 16,239 439,901 531,926 57,700 413,563 573,323 80,622 (23) 707 (75) 305,428 247,835 265,779 263,848 1,586,996 18 1,586,996 18 580,897 580,897 2,025,210 19 1,754,694 19 686,642 20 694,773 20 14,447 21 14,477 21 8,430,016, 22 8,430,016 22 9,199,374 23 9,141,693 23 307,590 307,590 265,779 263,848 Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 17 Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projs. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Sec. 197, 1960 R&H Act. 18 Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 19 Includes $140,210 for previous projs. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 20 Includes $38,959 for previous projs. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 21 Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 22 Includes $1,187,977 for previous projs. 23 Includes $945,684 for previous projs. 20-18 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 20. Port Clinton Harbor, OH 21. Put-In-Bay, OH 22. Rochester Harbor, NY 23. Rocky River, OH 24. Sandusky Harbor, OH New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 19,997 39,014 17,979 39,014 (26) 87,392 87,358 71,950 71,950 1,112,994 1,110,968 87,392 87,358 2,439,308 24 2,439,308 24 33,030 878,023 17,804 1,006,392 24,963,913 38,057 863,718 32,435 1,005,943 24,963,395 29,168 12,188 23,815 69,245 12,188 23,815 109,100 706,616 834,000 109,756 708,753 788,162 564,454 564,426 343,494 343,494 3,676,068 3,676,040 6,727,270 25 6,727,270 853,801 23,490,334 900,228 23,490,142 675,606 675,606 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. Maint Cost 24 Includes $247,794 for previous projs. 25 Includes $477,149 for previous projs. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 20-19 15,445 15,445 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 25. Sturgeon Point, NY (Contributed Funds) 26. Toledo Harbor, OH 27. Toussaint River, OH (Contributed Funds) 28. Vermilion Harbor, OH 29. West Harbor, OH (Contributed Funds) 30. Wilson Harbor, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Maint. Contrib. Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost (24,200) (560) 6,552 6,640 13,000 12,849 17,063 17,063 1,718,700 26 1,718,140 26 87,479 87,327 1,299,008 1,299,008 17,191,842 27 17,191,842 27 2,257,000 2,395,459 4,192,300 3,358,834 123,098,486 2,973,534 2,400,139 3,328,312 4,236,765 123,093,308 403,122 402,646 125,000 77,625 200,000 152,423 44,835 181,417 159,235 56,864 290,548 58,351 128,018 214,465 5,932 223,977 9,671 5,960 221,701 11,843 403,122 402,646 125,000 77,625 1,156,118 28 1,156,118 28 (7) 2,860,909 2,860,909 139,775 139,775 (6,419) (124) 3,303,898 3,303,898 1,985,877 1,985,877 3,795,000 3,795,000 535,246 29 535,246 29 962,092 962,092 26 Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 27 Includes $1,624,695 for previous projs. 28 Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 29 Includes $57,342 for previous projs. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 20-20 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY 31. Lake Erie Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH (Contributed Funds) 32. New York State Canal System, NY 33. Rochester Harbor, NY (Wave Surge) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost 100,000 145,100 359,639 1,525,000 86,353 157,577 109,833 1,576,664 57,000 54,791 370,000 2,146 138,187 100,000 98,499 378,000 3,422,000 44,413 3,750,616 3,190,000 714,748 533,572 51,617 750,000 3,254,292 (1,000,000) 461,518 787,918 44,008 235,536 (1,100,000) (105,319) SHORE PROTECTION 34. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost 450,036 659,000 500,000 452,010 641,682 509,500 450,000 685,000 474,000 441,364 637,389 517,453 800,000 33,887,049 755,832 33,823,994 4,978 4,978 800,000 24,689,867 819,876 24,683,907 FLOOD CONTROL 35. Mount Morris Lake, Genesee River, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost 23,365,559 30 23,365,559 30 1,772,300 2,562,880 2,036,000 2,751,577 31,949,628 1,786,848 2,464,985 2,015,118 2,978,997 31,909,102 30 Includes study cost of $117,000 under authority Sec 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Excludes $17,493 in contributed cost. 20-21 2,236,738 2,035,758 527,000 293,622 3,800,000 3,795,029 4,000,000 2,328,465 1,904,292 1,188,125 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 36. Reno Beach, Howard Farms, OH (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost (49,000) 12 (49,371) (5,783) 12 58,372 5,483,594 387 5,483,579 476,717 689 476,683 URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 37. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge, NY (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost 338,305 567,284 586,033 3,691,500 54,433 20-22 981,480 1,877,871 3,406,000 2,544,856 3,691,500 2,032,304 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Jun 3, 1896 Construction of breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and Jun 25, 1910 constructing new east breakwater pier heads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; remove part of old east breakwater. Mar 2, 1919 Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Aug 30, 1935 Remove portion of east breakwater to, extend breakwaters to present dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Aug 26, 1937 Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and Maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Mar 2, 1945 Extend river channel to present project limit. Sep 3, 1954 Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 25-foot depth. Jul 14, 1960 A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of Breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 d. feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Oct 27, 1965 Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. Aug 11, 1888 Jun 3, 1896 Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132 H. Doc. 654. 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., I1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th cong., 1st sess.' BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Aug 8, 1917 Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900 p.4 152 . H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., And Annual Report 1901, p.3 34 3 . 20-23 'Contains latest published map. I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Mar 3, 1905 Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deep water pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier towpath wall. Jul 27, 1916 Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north Mar 2, 1945 entrance channel. Sep 22, 1922 Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Mar 3, 1925 Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Jun 26, 19342 Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Aug 30, 1935 Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; Enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island Pier Improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project. 4 Mar 2, 1945 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Sep 3, 1954 Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY May 20, 1826 Construction of south pier (extended in 1868).6 Jun 23, 1866 Construction of old breakwater. 6 Jun 23, 1874 Extension of old breakwater.6 Jun 3, 1896 Stony Point and south breakwater 6 Mar 3, 1899 Mar 3, 1909 H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. & H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' 5 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 -232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 -236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 And 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. North breakwater. 6 2 Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3 Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 4 Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was de-authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. 5 Classified deferred. 6 Completed under previous projects. 20-24 Table 20-B Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun 6, 1900 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing Jun 18, 1902 rock shoal therein. Mar 2, 19077 Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.6 Mar 2, 1907 South entrance breakwater. 6 Jun 25, 1910 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site. Jul 25, 1912 Deepening areas A, B, D, in outer harbor to 21 feet, C in north entrance to 23 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Jan 21, 1927 Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Jul 3, 1930 Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor 21 feet. Aug 30, 19358 Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, Deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Aug 30, 1935 Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship Mar 2, 19458 canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Jul 14, 1960 Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Oct 23, 1962 Deepening approach to south entrance channels, and deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits.easterly 50 foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions or work authorized by 1935 act, combined within this act as a single improvement. 7 Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar 3, 1905 8 Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 550, 62nd Cong., 2 nd sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong. 1st sess. H.Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-25 I I - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Jul 14, 1960 Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan As amended bridge. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized Chief of Engineers Dec 15, 1980. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING Nov. 28, 1990 The Secretary may remove, as part of operation and P.L. 101-640 maintenance of a navigation project, contaminated sediments outside the boundaries of and adjacent to the navigation channel. The Secretary may remove contaminated sediments from the waters of the United States, in general, for the purpose of environmental enhancement and water quality improvement if such removal is requested by a non-Federal sponsor and the sponsor agrees to pay 50% of the cost of the removal. Oct. 12, 1996 Amended P.L. 101-640 to include Buffalo Harbor, NY P.L. 104-303 as priority work. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY Aug 13, 1968 (See Section 4 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess. at mouth of Creek entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1875 West breakwater. Annual Report, 1876, p.558. Aug 5, 1886 Part of east breakwater.6 H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. Aug 11, 1888 Extension of east breakwater. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. Jun 3, 1896 Reconstruction of piers.6 Mar 3, 1899 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor is discretion of Secretary of War. Jun 13, 1902 Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Mar 2, 1907 Jun 25, 1910 Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Jul 27, 1916 Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc 118, 56th Cong, 2nd sess. No printed report. H. Doc 891, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. 20-26 Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 8, 1917 Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga Aug 29, 1937 and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Aug 30, 19359 Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension on west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore Arm of west breakwater. Aug 30, 19358 Mar 2, 194510 Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. 11 12 Jul 24, 1946 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 13 Jul 3, 1958 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river. 14 Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin.15 Oct 23, 1962 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending 3,800 feet H. Doc. 707, 63rd Cong., 2d sess., & Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 477, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 9 Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 10 First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved Apr 1, 1944. 1 Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 12 Authorized by Defense Plant Corp. May 19, 1942. 13 Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 14 Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 15 Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from Bridge 1 to and including Old River, Classified deferred. 20-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 See Section Acts Work Authorized easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Jul 14, 1960 Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 As amended to 27 feet. Oct 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater; construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Aug 15, 1985 Deepening and widening east entrance and approach channels, deepening the east basin channel and disposing of dredge material in an existing disposal site, as described in the Report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors Jan 22, 1985, including bulk heading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34 and including such modifications as may be recommended by the Chief of Engineers at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. Nov 17, 1986 Bulk heading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient wells in the area south of Pier 34. Dec 21, 1987 Appropriates and directs the Secretary of the Army to use the sum of $11,000,000 which is to remain available until expended to carry out the provisions for the harbor modifications contained in PL 99-662. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized Chief of Engineers Dec 6, 1966. Sec. 175, PL 94-587 PL 99-88 Sec. 202, PL 99-662. PL 100-202. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 20-28 Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT See Section Acts Work Authorized CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Jun 25, 1910 Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Aug 8, 191716 Realignment of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. Aug 30.19358 Removal of portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Oct 23, 1962 Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft Material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet mihna rd material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized, but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Oct 12,1996 De-authorized the most southerly 300 feet of the 1,670 foot long shore arm, authorized by the R&H Act of 1910. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1827 Construction of west pier.6,17 Mar 2, 1867 Breakwater and evacuation of entrance channel to 13 feet. 6 Jun 3, 1896 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth of suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Jun 25, 1910 Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Jun 30, 1948 Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Dec 15, 1970 Construction of small-boat harbor. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303 S. Ex. Doc.42, 35th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p. 155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 1 H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. 16 Permit of Secretary of War, Aug 5, 1927. 17 Modified 1828 and 1852. 20-29 Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Documents I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized (House Public Works Committee) Jun 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Committee) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 ERIE HARBOR, PA May 26, 1824 Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle peninsula.6 Mar 3, 1899 Deeping channel and harbor basin 18 feet, repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection of work on peninsula. Jun 15, 1910 Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Nov 28, 192019 Re-conveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Aug 30, 1935 Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, all to resent project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Mar 2, 1945 Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Sep 3, 1954 Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Jul 14,1960 Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material mitnh e remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin.20 Oct 23, 1962 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a sin le im rovement. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H.Doc.70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. And Annual Report, 1896, p.3237.18 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 52, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.1 20-30 Table 20-B Documents 10 is Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov 1981. '9 Public Law 366. 2o Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug 1982. BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 182521 Construction of piers. Jun 3, 1896 Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1919 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier, and deepening of to 19 feet. Jan 21, 1927 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to Jul 3,1930 the United States of $715,000. Aug 30, 193522 Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Aug 26, 1937 Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basmn in Grand River to present project dimensions. Jul 24, 1946 Dredging of 8-foot river channel. HURON HARBOR, OH Mar 2, 1905 Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Mar 2, 1919 Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west pier. Aug 30, 193522 Extension of west pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and construction pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Oct 23, 1962 Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147- 2153. H .Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p. 29 56 ; 1 903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 5, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 1 20-31 Table 20-B Documents 11 12 21 Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22 Partly included in Public Works Administration Program, Nov 15, 1933. I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized 13 14 15 IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Jul 3, 1958 Construction entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet, access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubble-mound structures 1,350 feet and 750 in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Aug 30, 1852 West entrance pier. 6 Jun 23, 1866 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide. 6 Mar 3, 1871 East pier and east breakwater. 6 Mar 3, 1881 Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 Breakwaters and extension of piers to present dimensions. Mar 2, 1907 Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Jun 25, 1910 Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Aug 8, 1917 Extend breakwaters to present dimensions. Aug 8, 1917 Deepen outer harbor and river channel of Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Jul 3, 1930 Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. Aug 30, 1935 Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock.9 Aug 30, 1935 Approach channel to municipal pier. 20-32 Table 20-B Documents H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess Annual Report, 1874, p.2 56 Annual Report, 1874, p.2 56 Annual Report, 1871, p.2 34 Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess., And Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 469, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2nd sess. Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess.Rivers and Harbors Committee BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. Drydock 2 present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. Drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Aug 30 1935 Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. Dock Specified in act. to present project dimensions. Mar 2, 1945 Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Jul 14, 1960 Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st. sess. vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project. 23 Jul 14, 1960 Construction of a 225 foot detached rubble mound breakwater and Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized as amended an 800 foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east Chief of Engineers Mar 12, 1986 breakwater shore arm I in the east basin of the outer harbor. Nov 17, 1986 Two bed cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet.5 32 NEW YORK STATE BARGE CANAL Nov 17 1986 Authorizes the Secretary to reimburse the State of New York for 50% of the cost of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the New York State Barge Canal. The Federal contribution shall be limited in any fiscal year to $5,000,000, or 50% of the expenditures in that fiscal year, whichever is the lesser.5 Oct 12, 1996 The Secretary may make capital improvements to the New York State Canal System for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, preservation, and maintenance of the New York State Canal System and its related facilities. The Federal share of the cost of capital improvements shall be 50%, up to a limit of $8,000,000. P.L. 99-662 P.L. 104-303 20-33 Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 23 Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 has been de-authorized. I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 See Section Acts 16 Work Authorized OAK ORCHARD, NY Mar 2, 1945 Harbor of refuge. Oct 12,1996 De-authorized a part of the Section 107 Small Boat Basin authorized by R&H Act of 1960, as amended. Documents H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303 OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1867 Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers.6 Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, p. 15 pt. IV, p. 158. Mar 4, 1913 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. H. Doc. 780, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. Nov 17, 1986 Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief Sec. 601, PL 99-662 of Engineers dated Jun 11, 1980. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Jul 11, 1870 Construction of outer west breakwater.6 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. Mar 2, 1907 Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A). 14 H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. Jul 3, 1930 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer Rivers and Harbors Committee harbor between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie- Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet. 24 Aug 30, 195 Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north Rivers and Harbors Committee of Seneca Street. Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Oct 17, 1940 Closing gap in west breakwater; deepemning west outer harbor, H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.25 Jun 30, 1948 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor.26 Sep 3, 1954 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. 20-34 Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 17 18 24 Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is de-authorized. 25 Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor de-authorized in may 1981. 26 Modification eliminated by River and harbor Act of Oct 26, 1962. BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct 23, 1962 Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 2 4-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Oct 12, 1996 De-authorized the portion of the Federal Channel authorized by P.L. 104-303 the R&H Act of 1910 as amended by the R&H Act of 1935, from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 Bridge upstream to the northernmost alignment of the Lake St. Bridge. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OH Jun 10, 1872 Parallel stone and pile jetties at mouth of river, east jetty 2,200 feet long and west jetty 1,980 feet long extending to 10-foot contour in lake channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide for outer 4,200 foot length and 200 feet wide for inner 800 foot length to Highway Bridge. ROCHESTER, HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1829 Construction of piers. 6 Aug 2, 1882 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers. 6 Jun 25, 1910 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Aug 30, 19353 Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Annual Report, 1875, p. 295 Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437; Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H.Doc. 484, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Mar 2, 1945 Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Bridge. Jul 14,1960 Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west Pier, a H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. 1 depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. Bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, stream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feed wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Nov 28, 1990 A navigation project for the mouth of the Genesee River in P.L. 101-640 Rochester, New York, by development and implementation of wave surge control measures. Project to be carried out under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577). 20-35 20 22 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Jun 10, 1872 East pier and dredging of channel. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Oct 27, 1965 Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 Construction of channel protection works. Annual Report 1871, p. 211 H. Doc. 70, 75h Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708. Jun 13, 1902 Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Mar 2, 1919 Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with . pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet Jan 21, 1927 Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet Aug 30, 1935 Enlargement of turning basin and construction rock dike. Oct 2,1945 Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Jul 14, 1960 Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to Junction Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock no. 3 to 24 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. Maumee Bay to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet And Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone re-vetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Jun 25, 1910 Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from fassett Street Bridge to Lake. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. 20-36 Table 20-B 23 24 Documents 26 i -- -- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Aug 30, 1935 Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. May 17, 1950 Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Sep 3, 1954 Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Jul 3, 1958 Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Jul 14, 1960 Deepening Bay Channel including widening to 28 feet, deepen River channels to NY Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge. 27 VERMILION HARBOR, OH Jul 4, 1836 Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Mar 3, 1875 Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Reconstruction of piers. Jul 3, 1958 New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WEST HARBOR, OH Oct 27, 1965 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters, entrance channel and access channel. WILSON HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1945 Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Aug 3, 1968 Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Jul 14, 1960 Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubble mound west breakwater extension, construct rubble mound east breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Sep 3, 1954 Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. River and Harbors Committee Doc 21, 72nd Cong., I1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess.1 Annual Report, 1880. Annual Report, 1874, p.2 19 H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct 21, 1987 H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 27 The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet on turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 20-37 Table 20-B Documents 28 29 30 25 34 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Jul 14, 1960 Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Mar 7, 1974 Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Oct 22,1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sand fill. Nov 17, 1986 Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Dec 22, 1944 Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. Construct a visitor center at Mt. Morris Dam to be known as the "William B. Hoyt II Visitor Center". SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH Jun 30, 1948 Construction of levee and flood wall system. Relocate 540 foot section of creek. H.Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 796, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 101, PL 94-587 Sec. 501, PL 99-662. H. Doc 615, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 103, PL 102-580 Sec 205, PL 80-858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 15, 1991 37 Nov 16, 1990 ONONDAGA LAKE, NY The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, The administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Governor of the State of New York, acting jointly, shall convene a management conference for the restoration and management of Onondaga Lake. The purpose of the conference shall include the development, in the 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this fact, for a Reaffirmation of PL 101-596. Nov 28, 1990 The Secretary is authorized to design and construct projects to address water quality problems associated with storm water Oct 31,1992 discharges from large storm events for... the watershed areas of Onondaga County and Syracuse, New York, from which waters discharge into Onondaga Lake, New York. The design of Projects shall ensure the development of effective Federal and non-Federal actions which will contribute toward compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Total project cost shall be shared at 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. Operation and maintenance cost shall be 100% non-Federal. PL 101-596 PL 101-640 PL 102-580 20-38 Table 20-B Documents 35 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-C RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Projiect Month-Year Surveyed Cattarraugus Creek Harbor, NY Aug-99 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Sep-99 Irondequoit Bay, NY Jun-99 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Sep-99 Oak Orchard, NY Sep-99 Olcott Harbor, NY Jun-99 Port Clinton Harbor, OH Sep-99 Vermilion Harbor, OH Jul-99 West Harbor, OH Sep-99 Wilson Harbor, NY Jun-99 20-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sep 30, 1999 See annual Operations & Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Barcelona Harbor, NY Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH Black River Harbor, NY Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Cattaraugus Creek, NY Cattaraugus Harbor Geneva-on-the Lake, OH Grasse River Massena, NY Kelleys Island, OH Little River at Cayuga Island, NY Morristown Harbor, NY Niagara Remedial Works, NY 9 Niagara River, NY1o Ogdensburg Harbor, NY Port Clinton harbor, NY Port Ontario Harbor, NY Pultneyville Harbor, NY 15 Put-In-Bay, OH Rocky River, OH Sackets Harbor, OH Sandusky River, OH 16 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1989 2 2 1994 1962 2 1996 1990 1891 19747 1969 1949 1966 1964 1987 1997 1995 1934 19517 1997 1982 1894 $ 1,185,853 1 19,763 3 42,401 602,016 4 275,082 57,410 4,804,060 5 3,145,176 6 9,000 3 129,874 46,804 8 6,221 6,069,395 559,457 11 1,720,466 12 71,950 2,369,621 14 68,219 51,609 343,494 25,010 58,0003 'Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 2 Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3 Amount includes maintenance; not separable. SExcludes $593,216 contributed funds. 5 Excludes $2,566,529 contributed funds. 6 Excludes $3,261,375 contributed funds. SAnnual Report for Detroit District. 8 Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 9 Cost of operation and Maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. o0C onstruction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H act was authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. " Includes local interest contribution of $27,563. 12 Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 13 Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 14In cludes $50,000 for previous projects. Excludes $1,299,008. '"A bandonment recommended in H. Doc. 275, 64'h Cong., 1t sess. 16 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69 h Cong., 1' sess. 20-40 1,958,238 1,769,056 345,623 9,627 6,580 13,218 510,819 290,845 1,423,038 13 1,067,211 40,961 20,087 14,357 3,111,614 28,617 557 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sep 30, 1999 See Annual Operations & Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hamlin Beach State Park, NY Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Maumee Bay State Park, OH Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY3 Completed Completed Completed Completed 1976 1987 1995 1963 $1,769,600 1,741,125 2,780,975 2 58,978 SFederal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. ' Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. Does not include $199,845 contributed funds. 20-41 $307 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To Full Report Sep 30, 1999 See Annual Operations & Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet Completed 1962 $ 371,985 1 Batavia and Vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY Completed 1957 335,385 Camp Perry, OH Completed 19672 275,000 3 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY4 Completed 1984 1,404,500 Cuyahoga River Basin, OH Active 1985 1,117,000 Dansville and Vicinity, Canaserga Creek, NY Active 1985 490,300 Fremont, OH, Sandusky River Completed 1976 8,589,824 5 Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY Completed 1978 3,929,300 6 Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek Completed 1971 3,542,068 ' Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY Completed 1954 79,730 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Completed - 226,429 Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 1,681,785 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY 4 Completed 1964 330,231 Ottawa, OH Deferred 1989 374,000 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montiville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, NY8 Point Place, Toledo, OH Reno Beach-Howard Farms, OH Scajaquada Creek, NY Syracuse Oswego River Basin, NY Warsaw, NY Oatka Creek 4 Wellsville, NY, Genesee River Inactive Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1950 1990 1997 1985 1954 1969 1978 281,559 9,885,733 9 5,483,192 10 4,944,852 3,349,248 558,317 " 3,145,303 12 'Excludes cost of $188,732 under Public Law 88-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 2 Annual Report for Detroit District. 3 Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 4 Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. s Includes local interest contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 6 Includes local interest contribution of $99,999. Excludes cost of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. ' Includes local interest contribution of $50,000. 8 In-active portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brooks has been deferred at the request of local interests. 9 Excludes $1,871,631 in contributed funds. 10 Excludes $475,994 in contributed funds. " Excludes cost of $26, 807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 2 Includes local interest contribution of $50,000. Excludes cost of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 20-42 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 1962 Aug-77 - - R&H Act' Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 1962 May-81 R&H Act Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY - Dec-92 - - Buffalo Ship Canal, Buffalo, NY - Dec-92 - - Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act 1950 Jan-90 - - Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1962 Nov-86- Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act 1948 Jan-90 12,464 - Conneaut Harbor, OH R&H Act, 1910 (southerly 300 1997 Oct-96 - - feet of shorearm) Conneaut Harbor, OH 1966 R&H Act, 1990 WRDA 1995 Nov-95 - - Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 19682 Nov-79 - - Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 - Dec-92 - - Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act 1976 Jan-90 506,344 - Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan-90 - - Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act 1978 Dec-92 101,500 - Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov-81 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug-77 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug-82 - - Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act - Jan-90 - - Fairport Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act 1995 Nov-95 67,000 - Fairport Harbor, OH Sec. 201 1965 FC Act 1995 Nov-95 - - Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act - Jan-90 - - Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug-77 1,524 - Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act 1963 Aug-77 - - Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act 1973 Jan-90 72,052 - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC 1951 Nov-83 29,000 - Act Huron Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act' 1963 Jan-90 - - Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug-77 8,159 - Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug-77 12,300 Lorain Harbor, OH - Sec. 107, R&H Act 1960 (Portion 1998 Oct-96 - - of small boat basin) Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act, modified by 1965 1966 Jan-90 R&H Act4 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19712 Nov-77 12,000 Morristown Harbor, NY 1927 R&H Act (Portion north 1949 Oct-96 - of northern boundary of Morris St. Extended. Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug-77 Extension of guide pier only: other improvements completed. 2 Annual Report For Detroit District. 3 Breakwater. 4 Uncompleted portion. 20-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1986 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY R&H Acts 1910, 1935 1987 (Portion from southernmost alignment of Rte 68 Bridge upstream to northern alignment of Lake St. Bridge) Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act 1963 Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act5 1963 Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act- Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act 1975 Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Selkirk Shores State Park, OH 1954 R&H Act3 1963 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Oh 1962 R&H Act - Watkins Glenn, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act- 5 Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 20-44 Nov-86 Oct-96 Jan-90 May-81 Jan-90 Nov-86 May-81 Jan-90 Aug-77 Aug-77 Jan-90 361,241 19,010 43,182 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20- H FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES FEDERAL CONTRIBUTED ACTIVITY COST COST Disaster Preparedness $ 246,371 Emergency Operations 61,978 - Rehabilitation 19,744 - Advance Measures 1,142,427 $120,491 TABLE 20-I FORMERLY USED REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (FUSRAP) FUSRAP SITE Niagara Falls Storage Site Lewiston, NY Ashland 1 Tonawanda, NY Ashland 2 Tonawanda, NY Praxair (Linde Air Projects) Tonawanda, NY Seaway Industrial Park Tonawanda, NY Bliss and Laughlin Steel Buffalo, NY Luckey Site Luckey, OH Painesville Site Painesville, OH Oakridge Transition Oakridge, TN Fusrap Dayton, OH FY 99 COST $ 1,785,937 18,345,923 12,328,645 5,180,619 624,224 1,226,514 2,157,053 1,420,921 1,910 4,247 20-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20-J GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA GENERAL OPERATIONS & STUDY INVESTIGATIONS MAINTENANCE NON-FEDERAL INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES $113,634 $606,877 FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES 69,015 $4,412 TECHNICAL SERVICES 16,308 QUICK RESPONSES 3,941 SS- TONAWANDA CREEK 30,037 SS - OHIO STUDY 26,488 SS CROGHAN DAM 9,669 WILLOUGHBY HILLS, OH 9,574 GENERAL HYDROLOGIC STUDIES 5,580 PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ONONDAGA LAKE NY PL 101-596 455,731 186,221 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (FULLY AUTHORIZED) OLCOTT HARBOR IMPROVEMENT, NY 707 SURVEYS NAVIGATION STUDIES CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH 50,514 MAUMEE RIVER, OH 17,523 FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES ONEIDA LAKE, NY 26,821 SPECIAL STUDIES ONONDAGA LAKE NY PL 101-596 122,445 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 36,820 REVIEW OF FERC LICENSES 5,372 INTERAGENCY WATER RESOURCE 12,944 NATURAL ESTUARY STUDIES 4,018 N. AMERICAN WATERFOWL MGMT PLAN 1,913 COORDINATION WITH OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS COOP WITH OTHER WATER AGENCIES 4,420 REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS 15,152 80 GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION 153 20-46 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES Navigation Work pursuant to Sec 107, P.L. 86-645 as amended Study Identification BUFFALO INNER HARBOR, NY MIDDLE BASS ISLAND, PUT-IN-BAY, OH PUT-IN-BAY HARBOR, PUT-IN-BAY, OH PORT BAY HARBOR, HURON, NY ROCHESTER HARBOR UNION SHIP CANAL - BUFFALO, NY SECTION 107 COORDINATION ACCOUNT Federal Cost $ 78,120 4,741 5,623 5,229 6,964 1,141 6,718 Non-Federal Cost Navigation Work pursuant to Sec 111, P.L. 86-645 as amended of the 1968 River & Harbor Act, as amended Study Identification LORAIN HARBOR, FORD CITY WEST, OH Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost 14,855 Shore Protection Activities pursuant to Sec. 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended Study Identification LAKE ERIE, ATHOL SPRINGS, HAMBURG, NY LAKE ERIE, PAINESVILLE, OH MEXICO POINT STATE PARK, NY SYLVAN BEACH BREAKWATER, ONEIDA LAKE, NY Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost 24,584 33,198 19,934 48,193 Flood Control Projects Pursuant to Sec. 205 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, as amended Study Identification BUFFALO CREEK, ERIE CO., NY CATTARAUGUS & CLEAR CREEK - ARCADE, NY CAZENOVIA CREEK, NY CHAGRIN RIVER, EASTLAKE, OH CROSS LAKE, NY EAST BRANCH HURON RIVER ELLICOTT CREEK - LANCASTER, NY GENESEE RIVER - PORTAGEVILLE, NY IRONDEQUOIT CREEK, PENFIELD KEUKA LAKE OUTLET MOD LIMESTONE CREEK, FAYETTEVILLE, NY SCAJAQUADA CREEK - DEPEW, NY SECTION 205 COORDINATION ACCOUNT THATCHER BROOK, GOWANDA, NY VERMILION RIVER, VERMILION, OH WEST BRANCH LIMESTONE CREEK. NY Federal Cost 6,071 2,595 190,412 32,678 14,696 15,741 3,577 8,669 47,079 9,555 75 4,565 12,322 5,244 33,662 9,548 Non-Federal Cost 16,449 20-47 I _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES Flood Control work pursuant to Sec 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended Study Identification CAYUGA CREEK - DEPEW, NY CONNEAUT CREEK, 1-90 BRIDGE KINGSVILLE, CUYAHOGA RIVER, BATH ROAD, AKRON, OH HILLCROFT RD BRIDGE, EIGHTMILE CR, BOSTON LAKE ERIE, SR 531 - NORTH KINGSVILLE, OH LAKE ERIE, SR 531 @ SR 534 - GENEVA, OH LAKE ONTARIO, ALBION WATER LAKE ONTARIO, SODUS POINT-WAYNE CO., NY MINNICK ROAD, TONAWANDA CREEK NIAGARA RIVER, TONAWANDA, NY SECTION 14 COORDINATION ACCOUNT SEWERLINE, CANADAWAY CREEK - FREDONIA, NY TONAWANDA CR - NIAGARA CO, NY TONAWANDA CREEK, QUEEN OF HEAVEN CEMETERY TONAWANDA CREEK, SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT Federal Cost 69,046 9,271 9,659 2,522 8,063 5,520 23,098 6,989 24,428 18,387 12,733 8,553 15,488 11,907 4,713 Non-Federal Cost Project Modification to Improve Environment pursuant to Sec 1135, PL. 99-662 Study Identification BUFFALO RIVER HABITAT COORDINATION ACCOUNT FUNDS INITIAL APPRAISALS ROCHESTER NAVIGATION CHANNEL, NY Federal Cost 2,195 8,219 24,338 6,227 Non-Federal Cost Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration pursuant to Sec 206, P.L. 104-303 Study Identification PRELIMINARY RESTORATION PLANS SEC 206 COORDINATION ACCOUNT FUNDS Federal Cost 24,396 7,617 Non-Federal Cost 20-48 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT * The District is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 601.1 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 577.5 feet; Lake Erie, 569.2 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 572.3 feet. These elevations are in feet above the mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec -- International Great Lakes Datum, 1985 (IGLD 1985). The IGLD 1985 is a datum or reference system used to define water levels within the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River system. This datum was implemented in January 1992, officially replacing IGLD 1955. At the time IGLD 1955 was established, it was recognized that this datum would have to be periodically revised due to isostatic rebound. Isostatic rebound is the gradual rising or bouncing back of the earth's crust from the weight of the glaciers that covered the Great Lakes region during the last ice age. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Alpena Harbor, MI ................... 21-2 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI................... 21-3 3. Ashland Harbor, WI .................. 21-3 4. Big Bay Harbor, MI .................. 21-4 5. Caseville Harbor, MI....... .......... 21-4 6. Cedar River Harbor, MI ............... 21-4 7. Charlevoix Harbor, MI ................ 21-5 8. Clinton River, MI .................... 21-6 9. Cornucopia Harbor, WI................ 21-6 10. Detroit River, MI..................... 21-7 11. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI ..... 21-7 12.FoxRiver,W I ....................... 21-8 13. Frankfort Harbor, MI ................. 21-9 14. Grand Haven Harbor, MI ............. 21-10 15. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI ........ 21-11 16. Green Bay Harbor, WI ............... 21-12 17. Greilickville Harbor, MI .............. 21-13 18. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI ............. 21-13 19. Harrisville Harbor, MI ................ 21-14 20. Holland Harbor, MI .................. 21-14 21. InlandRoute,MI.................... 21-15 22. Kenosha Harbor, WI ................. 21-15 23. Kewaunee Harbor, WI ................ 21-16 24. Keweenaw Waterway, MI ............. 21-17 25. Knife River Harbor, MN.............. 21-17 26. La Pointe Harbor, MI ................ 21-18 27. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels ........... 21-18 28. LelandHarbor, MI ................. 21-18 29. Lexington Harbor, MI................ 21-19 30. Little Lake Harbor, MI ................ 21-19 31. Ludington Harbor, MI ................ 21-20 32. Manistee Harbor, MI ................. 21-20 Navigation (Continued) Page 33. Manistique Harbor, MI.................21-21 34. Manitowoc Harbor, MI ................ 21-21 35. Marquette Harbor, MI ................. 21-22 36. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI .... 21-23 37. Milwaukee Harbor, WI.................21-24 38. Monroe Harbor, MI. .................. 21-24 39. Muskegon Harbor, MI.................. 21-26 40. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ................ 21-26 41. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ................. 21-26 42. Pentwater Harbor, MI .................. 21-27 43. Petoskey Harbor, MI ................... 21-28 44. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ................ 21-28 45. Port Washington Harbor, WI ............. 21-29 46. Port Wing Harbor, WI .................. 21-29 47. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ............... 21-30 48. Rouge River, MI.......................21-30 49. Saginaw River, MI....................21-31 50. St. Clair River, MI...................21-32 51. St. Joseph Harbor, MI.................. 21-32 52. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI.................21-33 53. Sebewaing River, MI...................21-33 54. Sheboygan Harbor, WI.................. 21-34 55. Silver Bay Harbor, MN................. 21-34 56. South Haven Harbor, MI................21-35 57. Sturgeon Bay and Lake MI Ship Canal, WI .............. 21-35 58. Two Rivers Harbor, WI.................21-36 59. White Lake Harbor, MI..................21-36 60. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI .............. 21-37 61. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 21-37 62. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 21-37 21-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation (Continued) Page 63. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.............. ........ 21-37 Shore Protection 64. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 21-38 65. Emergency Shore Protection ........... 21-38 66. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 21-39 67. Mitigation of Shore Damage ........... 21-39 68. Project Modification for Improving the Quality of the Environment ............ 21-40 Flood Control 69. Clinton River Spillway, MI ............ 21-41 70. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN ............ 21-41 71. Kawkawlin River, MI ............... .. 21-42 72. Saginaw River, MI .................. 21-43 73. Sebewaing River, MI ................. 21-44 74. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. . 21-45 75. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 21-45 76. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ..................... 21-45 77. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies........ 21-46 NAVIGATION 1. ALPENA HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Thunder Bay River which empties into Thunder Bay, Lake Huron. Harbor is 100 miles southeast of Cheboygan Harbor, MI. River has its source in Montmorency and Alpena Counties, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Previous Project. For details see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1548 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for a bay channel 200 feet wide and 25 feet deep from deep water in Thunder Bay to a point 300 feet lakeward of the Alpena Light; thence an entrance channel 24 feet deep, narrowing to Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 78. St. Marys River, MI ................... 21-49 General Investigations 79. Surveys ................... .......... 21-51 80. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 21-52 81. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 21-52 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ...... 21-54 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 21-74 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 21-89 Table 21-D Not Applicable Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 21-91 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power, St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ................ 21-91 Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 21-92 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project ...... 21-95 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams .... 21-96 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surv.. 21-97 a width of 100 feet at a point 700 feet upstream from the light; a river channel 100 feet wide, 23 feet deep to Second Avenue Bridge; thence 18.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide for 1,600 feet to upper limit of Federal project; a turning basin at upstream end of project, basin at river mouth 19 feet deep, trapezoidal in shape, with a maximum width of 700 feet including the channel width and a maximum length of 900 feet along the channel line, including removal of existing rubble breakwater; and a breakwater about 550 feet long paralleling lakeward side of new turning basin. Work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, which consists of the proposed turning basin and breakwater reconfiguration, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) OF 1986; Public Law (PL) 99-662, November 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-2 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Terminal Facilities. Several commercial docks along Thunder Bay River used primarily for receipt of coal and petroleum products. Also a municipal marina basin about 0.25 mile southwest of river mouth. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,718. Engineering and design for repair of the Rubblemound Breakwater continued at a cost of $53,147. Existing project was completed in 1939. The modification of existing project at Alpena Harbor, as authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, was reclassified into an inactive status May 22, 1969 based on an unfavorable benefit-cost ratio. In 1975 the modification was recommended and reviewed for deauthorization, which was withdrawn by Congressional Resolution the same year. Subsequently, the work authorized by the 1965 Act was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986. Project features range from fair to poor. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,557,021, of which $337,394 was for new work and $1,199,627 for maintenance. 2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing Project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests, for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,397. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,342. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 4,297 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $29,688. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $39,950. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,218,260. 3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing Project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,836. Repairs to the Breakwater, Sections B & C- 1, were performed using the U. S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $37,395. Supervision and administration cost $8, 814. 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,947,837, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $4,252,192 was for maintenance. 4. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A State-owned launching ramp and dock for small craft. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,453. Engineering and design for future maintenance dredging cost $5,525. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,917,500, of which $396,943 was for new work and $1,520,557 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $56,500 contributed funds. 5. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Pigeon River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon River. Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion of project is $30,000 (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities constructed by State and local agencies are available in addition to privately owned and operated marinas. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,402. Engineering and design for future maintenance dredging cost $5,628. The existing project was completed in 1964 except for the inactive portion of the project. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,318,620, of which $587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 contributed funds) and $1,731,306 for maintenance. 6. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of Green Bay, an arm of Northern Lake Michigan, about 68 miles north of City of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are Menominee, MI, 27 miles southwest and at Escanaba, MI, 20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing Project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west pier 230 feet long and a rubblemound east pier 875 feet long with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River about 900 feet long; and inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near 21-4 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT upstream end of inner bridge channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. No local sponsor has been identified. The State of Michigan is awaiting completion of the limited Re-evaluation Report. Terminal Facilities. There are no permanent docking, mooring or handling facilities. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The contract awarded last FY for repair of the East Pier was 93% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $908,934. Engineering and design during construction cost $3,440. Engineering and design for repair of the West Pier continued at a cost of $106,600. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing approximately 48,732 cubic yards of shoal material in the amount of $849,399. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $210,050. Total cost to end of FY was $2,983,765 of which $408,000 was for new work and $2,575,765 for maintenance. 7. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing Project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the WRDA of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreation uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." Local Cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the constructing and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminal commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-ways for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1971; PL 91- 646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $625,000. Terminal Facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $47,686. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,936. South Revetment, Section J, Concrete repairs and obstruction removal was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $91,581. Supervision and administration cost $6,992. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. Navigation structures are in fair condition with miscellaneous repairs scheduled in future years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,813,439, of which $180,623 was for new work, $10,503,420 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 8. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its sources in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous Project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $6,329. Engineering and design for future maintenance dredging cost $4,905. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $8,001,377, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds), $3,655,399 for maintenance and $3,796,180 for diked disposal. 9. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,332. Emergency dredging was performed by contract in the amount of $16,972. Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Navigation structures are in fair condition, repairs will be scheduled in future years. Total cost of the existing 21-6 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT project to end of FY was $1,666,172, of which $462,653 was for new work and $1,203,519 for maintenance. 10. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous Project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 572.3 and 569.2 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and the 1956 R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel modification approved Aug. 13, 1968, were deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Terminal Facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $921,911. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge VELER and the U.S. Survey Vessel PAJ at a cost of $1,295,456. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor and contract at a cost of $45,769. Real estate, and supervision and administration cost $174,076. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $243,608,717, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds), $124,260,775 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance and $42,470,585 for diked disposal. 11. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous Projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. The current recommended plan involves only the mechanical dredging of the Cross Channel Turning Basin with disposal at the Erie Pier CDF. The remainder of the project is now unscheduled. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing. Terminal Facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $480,280. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and park pier performed by hired labor cost $175,946. Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $369,657. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $139,366. Duluth and Superior Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $288,934. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor and contract cost $32,238. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $24,050. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the South Pier, Sections R1-R4, was 82% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $1,000,000. Engineering and design during construction cost $26,725. An adjustment of $17,926 was made in contract cost and 455 in cubic yards for the FY98 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $1,392,400. The contract was 6% complete at the end of this FY at a cost of $83,806. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $266,478. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. Of the work authorized in WRDA 1986, only the Cross Channel dredging has been completed (September 1994). All other authorized improvements are unscheduled. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $106,171,317, of which $17,226,343 was for new work (includes $331,685 contributed funds), $75,833,315 for maintenance, $1,556,249 for diked disposal and $11,555,410 for rehabilitation. 12. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous Projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths 21-8 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513, 424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Section 332 of the WRDA of 1992 authorized the transfer of the navigation system to the State of WI subject to agreement; however, water regulation and dam operation will be continued by the Federal government. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental activities, safety training, miscellaneous inspections and reports, and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $376,305. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $341,937. Real Estate activities were performed at a cost of $33,951. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $76,769. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $682,899. Supervision and administration costs were $76,463. Work for Phase I site assessment to support the transfer of the locks to the state of Wisconsin was initiated at a cost of $71,900. Lock repairs at DePere, Little Kaukauna and Menasha, and valves and seals repairs at DePere and Menasha were performed by contracts at a cost of $257,720. Engineering and design for this work cost $68,589. Supervision and administration of the contracts cost $49,037. Correction of design deficiencies identified by periodic inspections at Little Kaukauna Lock cost $8,595. Engineering and design for repair of the right abutment at Upper Appleton Dam continued at a cost of $7,934. Engineering and design for repair of the access road and retaining wall at Upper Appleton Dam was initiated at a cost of $49,000. Engineering and design for repair of the Little Kaukauna Dam retaining wall was also initiated at a cost of $27,668. The FY97 contract to renovate gate hoist and electrical mechanism at nine (9) dams was completed at a cost of $918,994. Engineering and design during construction for this work cost $2,625. Engineering and design for a second contract to be awarded next FY cost $33,629. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $92,752. The contract awarded last FY for Canal Bank repairs was completed this FY at a cost of $6,654. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $7,827. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. The dams tainter gates are scheduled to receive new hoist mechanisms. Existing dams are generally fair to good; but many of the locks are in extremely poor condition. Only the most critical lock repairs are being made to maintain the pool for industry and hydropower users. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $65,753,845, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $62,000,511 for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 13. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing Project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 21-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north pier and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters; thence to maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters and to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18- foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $43,064. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $6,782. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,611,058, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $12,131,782 for maintenance, $1,204,500 for diked disposal and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 14. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous Project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 90) is $20,400,000, which includes $11,754,000 Federal and $8,646,000 non-Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-10 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $4,246,000. The estimated cash contribution of $4,246,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $2,040,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal Facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish, and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $228,587. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $124,220. Minor structure repairs and safety maintenance were performed by hired labor and contract at a cost of $163,246. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier, Section B, was initiated at a cost of $59,000. An adjustment of $59,401 was made in contract cost and 30,820 in cubic yards for FY98 maintenance dredging of the inner harbor completed last FY. A multi-year contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor. The basic requirement for this work was completed this FY, removing approximately 25,902 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $175,345. This contract was also for Section 111 beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $78,809. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $50,000. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $49,915. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $4,576. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are in a general state of deteriorating condition and are scheduled for repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $38,240,959, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $35,188,477 for maintenance (includes $15,585 contributed funds), $780,400 diked disposal and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 15. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MN Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local 21-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,824. Strike removal was performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $30,208. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing approximately 11,673 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $55,019. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $40,386. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $2,506,112, of which $329,565 was for new work and $2,176,547 for maintenance. 16. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous Projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1990) is $6,130,000; $4,030,000 Federal and $2,100,000 non-Federal which includes $1,970,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the WRDA of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal Facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $473,202. Development of dredged material management plans was initiated at a cost of $48,609. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $3,651. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor was completed this FY at a cost of $1,309,003, removing approximately 116,399 cubic yards of shoal material. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing approximately 102,284 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $973,735. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $145,730. Final cost for engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility was $98. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above C & N.W. Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide 21-12 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $60,085,929 ($59,145,129 regular funds and $940,800 Public Works Funds), $9,946,395 for new work, $42,235,223 for maintenance and $7,904,311 for diked disposal. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 17. GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Location. On Lake Michigan at the south end of the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay, about 45 miles southwesterly from Charlevoix and 29 miles northeasterly from Frankfort. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Existing Project. Provides for dredging a basin 600 feet wide and about 850 feet long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder, protected by a steel sheet pile breakwater about 1,300 feet long with a 300-foot long rubblemound extension along a line bearing south 60 degrees west from outer end of steel structure and a detached rubblemound breakwater 420 feet long along south side of the basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. An existing public wharf (built in connection with the 1948 authorization), a boat launching ramp, and a small privately operated yacht harbor located beyond the limits of the existing project. The existing public wharf deteriorated from lack of maintenance and must be rebuilt. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,596. Existing project was completed in August 1951. The last modification was completed during FY 1967. Controlling depths are 14 feet in the outer basin and 10 feet in the inner basin. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $685,163, of which $369,557 was for new work and $315,606 for maintenance. The new work does not include $121,000 contributed funds. 18. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,138. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $1,157. An adjustment of $100 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging awarded and completed last FY. Supervision and administration to closeout the contract cost $4,441. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $17,000,995, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $15,362,793 for maintenance, $243,100 for diked disposal and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 21-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 19. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing Project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $5,730. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,055,569, of which $2,639,392 was for new work (includes $287,454 contributed funds) and $1,416,177 for maintenance. 20. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous Project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized Dec, 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Terminal Facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $172,977. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $27,180. A multi-year contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor. The basic requirement for this work was completed this FY, removing 17,661 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $56,801. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $62,505. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $50,000. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $16,512. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $4,139. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition with repairs anticipated within the next 5 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $31,135,303, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $27,576,724 for maintenance, $1,663,300 for diked disposal and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 21-14 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT 21. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on Sep. 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. None exist for commercial cargo-handling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY 99, the lock was operated from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. April 24-25, May 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 & 23, September 13-30. The lock was operated 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. May 29-31, June 1-30, and 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. September 1-12. The lock was operated from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July 1 - August 31. In October, the lock was open on weekends only from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The lock closed for the season on October 10. Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $39,796. A contract for maintenance dredging the Indian River was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 21,200 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $434,826. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration of the contract cost $64,980. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,665,557, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds), $3,343,035 for maintenance, and $404,300 for diked disposal. 22. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous Project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $195,000 non-Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorization legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fish wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $14,308. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 32,706 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $339,299. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $84,332. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition, Detached North Breakwater needs repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,949,437 ($13,921,779 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief Funds), of which $988,969 was for new work, $7,311,593 for maintenance, $4,378,600 for diked disposal and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 23. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous Projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021 Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000, July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $113,676. Repairs to the North Detached Breakwater, Section H and the North Pier, Section A, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $81,664. Maintenance of the diked disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,224. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $622,650. Bonds cost $25,999. Work will begin next FY. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration cost $57,054. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,111,794, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief Funds) $7,774,700 for 21-16 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT maintenance, $2,961,461 for diked disposal and $617,300 for rehabilitation. 24. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing Project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, PL 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $70,415. Upper Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $343,906. Supervision and administration cost $29,511. Active portion of the project is complete. Lower entry piers are in fair condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required within the next ten years. Upper entry breakwaters are in good condition, but require annual stone maintenance due to severity of the wave climate. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $35,030,591, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, $27,532,950 for maintenance and $1,523,500 for diked disposal. 25. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN Location. Near mouth of Knife River on north shore of Lake Superior, 19 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN, and 7 miles southwest of Two Harbors, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel with a system of overlapping breakwaters, using the existing breakwater and a new breakwater constructed of 731 feet of rock rubblemound. The entrance channel is 9 feet deep and an inner straight channel is 8 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 600 feet long with a public marina and side channel at its inner end. For additional details see page 1110 of Annual Report for 1963. A modification to correct a design deficiency was authorized in 1974. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interests are to furnish easements on 15.08 acres of land. Terminal Facilities. Local interests have installed pileand- timber docks on both sides of straight channel. Lake County has completed construction by contract of a marina along the east wing of the inner harbor. Operations During Fiscal Year. New Work: Final costs for design deficiency plans developed in response to the 1974 authorization which were reviewed and a Design Review Report prepared were $18,482. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,310. Project was completed in June 1958. Breakwater is in fair condition. The existing breakwater does not effectively prevent waves caused by northeasterly winds 21-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 from entering the entrance channel. This results in unsatisfactory and unsafe harbor entrance conditions during storms. Mooring conditions in the main channel and Y-branches of the inner harbor are also adversely affected. Plans and specifications for the construction of a breakwater to correct a design deficiency to reduce wave damage and improve navigation conditions were completed and approved by NCD in 1982. Total project costs to end of FY were $842,138, of which $528,945 was for new work and $313,193 for maintenance. 26. LaPOINTE HARBOR, WI Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Aspostle Island group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973). Existing Project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (PL 645, 86th Congress), as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not as a part of the Federal project. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,952. Maintenance dredging was performed by contract, removing approximately 700 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $9,332. Supervision and administration cost $617. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $320,680, of which $139,874 was for new work and $180,806 for maintenance. 27. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS IN Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous Project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of the water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $100,899. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility by hired labor and contract cost $6,283. Engineering and design for future maintenance dredging cost $6,995. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $21,681,321, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works Funds), $8,886,164 for maintenance, and $5,119,800 for diked disposal. 28. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) 21-18 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $21,264. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,951. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing 14,967 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $57,401. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $38,728. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,673,485, of which $1,027,089 was for new work (includes $354,139 contributed funds), $3,575,718 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 29. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal Facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,681. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $908. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed in the future cost $5,045. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed by government forces at a cost of $24,740. Engineering and design for beach nourishment by trucking to be performed in the future cost $20,623. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,984,445, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $2,877,253 for maintenance. 30. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing Project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep 21-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Only terminal facility at project consists of a public dock built by the State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $21,503. Option year 1 of FY98 contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 15,997 of cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $86,490. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $22,925. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. Navigation structures are in fair condition. West Breakwater has deteriorated with stone migrating into navigation channel. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,218,598, of which $600,478 was for new work (includes $57,670 contributed funds) and $4,618,120 for maintenance. 31. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous Project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing Project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total cost for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $106,524. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,226. Engineering and design for repair of the North Breakwater, Section B, was completed this FY at a cost of $34,782. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $1,527,410. The contract was 99% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $1,504,999. Engineering and design during construction cost $4,726. Supervision and administration cost $64,634. Monitoring in connection with Section III of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $19,906. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $29,360,965, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $20,470,850 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. The maintenance cost does not include $136,286 contributed funds. 32. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles 21-20 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous Project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $55,710. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor and contract cost $4,924. Repairs to the North Pier, Sections A-1 and A-E, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $167,070. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $31,346. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from generally fair to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $16,077,638, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $12,006,952 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 33. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1452 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,475. Engineering and design for repair of the East and West Breakwater, Sections F,E,C & D, was completed at a cost of $28,631. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $3,561,594. The contract was 5.6% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $199,999. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are under major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,345,961, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $2,730,273 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 34. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 106 miles from Green Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous Projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. 21-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Existing Project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension affirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $9,206; additional assurances require that the sponsor provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal Facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $61,878. Repairs to the confined disposal facility filter cell and obstruction removal was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $109,391. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $24,332. An adjustment of -$7,822 was made in cost for materials purchased and stockpiled for future repairs. Existing project is complete except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification was deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. South Revetment, Section E, is in fair condition and is programmed for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $16,035,297, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds), $8,993,497 for maintenance (includes $47,860 contributed funds), and $3,081,756 for diked disposal. 35. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 21-22 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing Project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal Facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $18,148. Minor safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $8,058. Real estate cost $9,951. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,926,695, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $3,178,045 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 36. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous Projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work, exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects, are $221,053 Federal and $40,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal Facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,897. Obstruction removal, entrance channel, was performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $141,901. Supervision and administration cost $950. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,620,717, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $3,104,967 for maintenance, $593,660 for diked disposal and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 37. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous Projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,934,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except deauthorized portion of 1945 Act. Act of Aug. 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, Feb. 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal Facilities. There are 4 car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $323,517. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $140,838. Repairs to the North Extension Breakwater, Sections B-3, C-1 and North Connector Breakwater, Section B, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $188,596. A contract was award for maintenance dredging in the amount of $595,110. The contractor was paid for bonds in the amount of $25,999. Work will being next FY. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $119,394. Cost adjustment in the amount of -$30,356. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1945 Rivers and Harbors Act was deauthorized in 1977. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $73,798,367, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $46,470,858 for maintenance (includes $322,471 contributed funds), $6,380,925 for diked disposal and $12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 38. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which 21-24 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200- foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal Facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $38,055. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility performed by hired labor cost $4,109. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed this FY, removing approximately 129,007 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $471,543. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 188,874 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $367,197. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $127,776. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $61,237,565, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), $21,560,643 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds: $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company) and $38,689,582 for diked disposal (includes $83,182 contributed funds). 21-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 39. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 19434.) Previous Project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $179,125. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 55,798 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $209,564. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $113,235. Under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483, an adjustment of $1 was made in contract cost for beach nourishment (trucking) completed last FY. Supervision and administration to closeout the contract cost $2,992. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $30,779,181, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $13,937,771 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 40. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,475. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 18,596 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $109,127. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $38,414. Existing project is complete. The South Breakwater is in fair condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required within the next five years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,878,213, of which $2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds), $5,224,530 for maintenance, and $181,500 for diked disposal. 41. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. About 140 miles east of Duluth, MN, on south shore of Lake Superior, at mouth of Ontonagon River; provides the only refuge for small craft between 21-26 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT the Keweenaw Waterway upper entrance and Black River Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous Project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17- and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $124,920. Repair of Light and West Breakwater, Section A, was performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $84,703. Final engineering and design costs for repair of the East Pier, Section B, and Wave Attenuator were $59,959. An adjustment of -$79,294 was made in contract costs for this work completed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for repair of the East Breakwater, Section B, in the amount of $427,440. Engineering and design for repair of the East Pier, Section A, failed tie rods, were initiated at a cost of $26,856. An adjustment of -$144,197 was made in contract costs for Option year 2 of FY96 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 39,842 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $189,684. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $140,059. An adjustment in cost was made in the amount of -$1,080. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Several areas along the piers have had tie rod failures which will require repairs within the next two years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $23,788,335, of which $953,903 was for new work, $22,813,432 for maintenance and $21,000 for diked disposal. 42. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing Project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were 21-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 performed by Government forces at a cost of $58,854. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier and Revetment, Sections A-D, F, Fl, (Phase II) was completed at a cost of $73,462. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $3,846,200. The contract was approximately 14% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $549,999. An adjustment of -$11,913 was made in contract cost for repair of the South Pier and South Revetment, Sections B, F-H, J, (Phase I) which was completed last FY. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,379. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 12,562 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $43,686. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $145,344. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. North Pier and Revetment are currently under major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,659,479, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $10,479,580 for maintenance. 43. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI Location. This harbor is on the east shore of Lake Michigan about 50 miles south of the Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Previous Project. For details see page 1954 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1547 of Annual Report for 1931, and page 2024 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing Project. Provides for a breakwater extending from shore 1,345 feet long of stone-filled timber crib, concrete capped, and rubblestone construction which protects the municipal pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There is a municipal pier which is about 635 feet long plus several recreational craft piers. These installations satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $126. Repair of the Extension Breakwater, Sections A, B & C, and filling of ports on concrete caps were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $214,341. Supervision and administration cost $22,695. The existing project was complete in 1938. Breakwater is in fair overall condition with minor repairs completed during this FY. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $1,086,408 of which $123,839 was for new work and $962,569 for maintenance. 44. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,413. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $4,166. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $30,000. Engineering and design for future beach nourishment (trucking) was initiated at a cost of $15,241. 21-28 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition, with miscellaneous repairs programmed in the next 5 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,382,681, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds), $3,640,452 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds) and $9,158 for diked disposal. 45. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous Project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $24,548. Repair of the North Breakwater, Sections B, C & Dl, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $89,452. Supervision and administration cost $21,696. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Navigation structures are in overall fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,611,524, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds), $3,394,699 for maintenance and $10,621 for diked disposal. 46. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing Project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,994. An adjustment amount of 8,834 was made in cubic yards for the FY98 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Liquidated damages in the amount of -$9,179 was also assessed the maintenance dredging contract. Supervision and administration to closeout the contract cost $1,407. Existing project is complete, except channel between piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was 21-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,503,227, of which $63,393 was for new work and $1,439,834 for maintenance. 47. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $9,037. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Piers, Sections A&B, continued at a cost of $24,811. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are programmed for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,164,748 of which $256,129 was for new work and $2,908,619 for maintenance. 48. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous Project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Act of Oct. 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on Jan. 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal Facilities. Numerous large commercial 21-30 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $58,214. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 45,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $437,997. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $58,128. An adjustment of -$4,963 was made in cost. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $38,711,705, of which $675,251 was for new work ($29,563 was expended from Emergency Relief Act Funds), $23,129,136 for maintenance and $14,907,318 for diked disposal. 49. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous Project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915; and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $692,877. Development of dredged material management plans were completed last FY. Minor confined disposal facility repairs performed by hired labor cost $10,748. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed this FY, removing approximately 103,827 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $580,992. A contract for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River was awarded this FY in the amount of $756,988. The contract was 88% complete at the end of FY, removing approximately 330,999 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $665,748. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $141,614. Construction of a diked disposal area for Upper Saginaw was dropped from the diked disposal program in FY97 due to the decline in PCB levels. Project no longer requires confinement. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $94,684,376, of which $14,930,727 21-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 was for new work (includes $13,600 for contributed funds), $58,801,761 for maintenance, and $20,951,888 for diked disposal. 50. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing Project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair; 577.5 and 572.3 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Tables 21-B and 21-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the middle channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between the upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, wood-pulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $104,843. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge VELER at a cost of $688,082. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $8,402. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $21,868. Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $46,644,934, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $27,431,688 for maintenance. 51. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous Project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88 declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a nonnavigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several commercial wharves for 21-32 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $117,179. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $6,610. A contract for maintenance dredging the outer channel was awarded and completed this FY, removing 22,482 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $125,105. This contract was also for beach nourishment. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging of the inner harbor, removing approximately 49,272 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $386,420. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $132,227. Environmental activities for a disposal area and polluted dredged material continued at a cost of $135,166. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 cost $54,573. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging of the outer channel contract cost $46,272. The contract for beach nourishment (trucking) awarded last FY was completed this FY at a cost of $61,101. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $18,664. Existing project was completed in 1956. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in generally good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $31,958,370, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $28,553,593 for maintenance, $638,076 for diked disposal and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 52. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous Project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. At city of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $66,143. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $5,237. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Pier, Sections A-C, (Phase I), were completed at a cost of $32,970. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $3,879,422. The contract was 79% complete at a cost of $3,060,525. Engineering and design during construction cost $14,264. Maintenance dredging performed by contract cost $47,335, removing 8,567 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and amdministration cost $107,448. Existing project was completed in 1903. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are under major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $8,160,686, of which $364,527 was for new work and $7,796,159 for maintenance. 53. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) 21-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Previous Project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal Facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $37,933. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $801. A limited dredged material management plan study was initiated at a cost of $147,911. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,218,511, of which $35,573 was for new work and $4,182,938 for maintenance. 54. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous Project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230 of Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $46,621. Minor structure repairs performed by hired labor cost $16,661. Real estate cost $7,663. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. It is anticipated repairs will be required in the next 5 to 7 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,997,233, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $8,344,325 for maintenance, $907,792 for diked disposal and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 55. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN Location. The city of Silver Bay, MN, is situated on the north shore of Lake Superior about 50 miles northeast of Duluth, MN. The proposed harbor of refuge is located between the Northshore Mining taconite processing facility and the city's water intake plant. The project site includes approximately 21.5 acres and includes over 2,000 feet of shoreline. Existing Project. The project was authorized under the River & Harbor Act 1945, House Document 446-78- 2. The project is a Harbor of Refuge for small boats navigating the north shore of Lake Superior. This harbor will be part of a system of small craft harbors of refuge at 30 to 40 mile intervals between Duluth and Grand Marais, Minnesota. The 1994 Appropriations Act for Energy and Water Development provided $2.6 Million Federal funds for the project. The State of Minnesota 21-34 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT will provide the funds for the non-Federal share. The project will repair/improve an existing breakwater and construct an additional adjacent breakwater. Local Cooperation. The State of Minnesota is the non-Federal sponsor, acting through the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The state provided all the required documentation and plans and specifications to the Detroit District for review, and the district awarded and is managing the construction. Operations During Fiscal Year. A total of $ 15,256 was expended this FY to close out the project and transfer the harbor to the State of Minnesota. Of the funds expended $15,255 was contributed by MDNR. Total cost to end of FY was $3,835,235. 56. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous Project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. The turning basin feature was subsequently deauthorized by Section 116 of the WRDA of 1992 (PL 102-580). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities; two have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $26,022. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $6,201. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier, Sections A-C (Concrete Caps), continued at a cost of $138,124. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90- 483 was performed at a cost of $25,000. The contract for beach nourishment (trucking) awarded last FY was completed this FY in the amount of $99,101. Supervision and administration cost $6,990. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,872,652, of which $984,426 was for new work, $8,213,769 for maintenance, $42,381 for diked disposal and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 57. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous Project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities, and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 21-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $100,564. Repairs to the North and South Breakwater, Sections A-C; North Revetment, Section M, using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $52,076. Engineering and design for repair of South Revetment, Section N was initiated at a cost of $62,798. Supervision and administration cost $22,719. Navigation structures are in fair condition, the South Revetment, Section N, is in poor condition and is programmed for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,848,753, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $10,593,013 for maintenance, $311,119 for diked disposal and $884,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 58. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous Project. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each side of the entrance channel between the piers. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 R & H Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys performed by Government forces and contract cost $1,194. Safety repairs cost $284. Existing project is complete except for portion deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. North Pier was completed in 1908. North Revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,410,634, of which $360,320 was for new work, $7,804,785 for maintenance, $1,187,472 for diked disposal and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 59. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On the east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing Project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. 21-36 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Terminal Facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on the north side of the lake about 3 miles from the inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across the lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were perform by Government forces at a cost of $34,786. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,836. An adjustment of -$1,657 was made in FY97 contract cost completed last FY for repair of the North & South Piers, Sections A-D (Phase I). The contract awarded last FY for repair of the North & South Pier and Revetment, Sections C-H & J (Phase II), was completed this FY at a cost of $550,603. Engineering and design during construction cost $14,797. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $92,834. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. Navigation structures are in excellent condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,471,428, of which $457,562 was for new work and $12,013,866 for maintenance. 60. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI Location: On south shore of Lake Superior 40 miles northwesterly from Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 53 miles easterly from Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by two breakwater structures and for dredging a harbor basin and entrance channel, 12 feet deep. The addition of a 270-foot wave absorbing breakwater inside the harbor was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 17, 1967, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned fishing wharf and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,934. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $5,813. Existing project was completed in 1960. The interior breakwater and repairs to the shore connection were accomplished by contract during FY 1969. Remaining structures are in generally good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,219,316, of which $771,639 was for new work and $447,677 for maintenance. 61. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-J. 62. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 63. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Duluth (McQuade Road) Harbor, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Duluth, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional 21-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Add in FY98 and FY99 to conduct a feasibility study for a harbor of refuge at Duluth (McQuade Road) Harbor. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the feasibility study was initiated in FY98, including review of design and coordination work already completed by the State of Minnesota. A Detailed Project Report and Environmental Assessment was completed in August 1999. Funds in the amount of $72,725 were expended in FY99. Taconite Harbor, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Taconite Harbor, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 to construct the harbor of refuge at Taconite Harbors. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the project design was initiated in FY98 and plans and specifications were completed on June 22, 1999. The State of Minnesota prepared the design analysis, plans and specifications and the Environmental Assessment. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on July 27, 1999, and the construction contract was advertised on August 27, 1999. Funds in the amount of $105,902 were expended in FY99. Total project cost is estimated to be $3,350,000, of which the Federal share would be $1,500,000. Two Harbors, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Two Harbors, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 to construct the harbor of refuge at Two Harbors. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the project design was initiated in FY98. Work conducted in FY99 included geotechnical investigations and surveys of the project area. Funds in the amount of $99,141 were expended in FY99. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 64. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended, Beach Erosion Control. None. 65. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit services (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended). River Raisin, Monroe County, Ellis Library, MI - Funds in the amount of $1,867 were expended in FY99 for completion of closeout activities of the project for constructing approximately 400 feet of streambank erosion along the River Raisin, adjacent to Monroe County's library system (Ellis). The completed facilities were turned over to the project sponsor on October 7, 1998. Berrien County, Lake Charter Township, MI - By letter dated March 4, 1997, Lake Charter Township requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 240 feet of a shoreline erosion problem threatening a water pumping station located in Charter Township of Lake Charter, Berrien County, MI. Planning and design analysis activities were initiated in FY97 and plans and specifications were completed in FY98. The project was approved for construction on June 26, 1998. On-site construction was completed in September 1999. The project is currently being transferred to the sponsor. Funds in the amount of $147,699 were expended in FY99, of which $61,099 was contributed by the Charter Township of Lake Charter. City of Escanaba, Delta County, MI - By letter dated 21-38 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT November 3, 1997, the City of Escanaba requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 1,400 feet of a shoreline erosion problem threatening the City of Escanaba's water treatment plant, in Delta County, MI. Project was approved for construction in June 1999. A construction contract was awarded in September 1999. On-site construction is to commence in May 2000. Federal funds in the amount of $99,437 were expended in FY99. Oconto River, McDonald Street, Oconto, WI - By letter dated November 20, 1997, the city of Oconto requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 640 feet of a streambank erosion problem threatening McDonald Street in the city of Oconto, WI. Planning and design analysis activities were initiated in FY97 and plans and specifications were completed in FY98. The project was approved for construction on March 5, 1998. Construction was completed in July 1999. Project to be transferred to the sponsor next FY for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $179,857 were expended in FY99, of which $81,765 was contributed by the City of Oconto. Belle Isle, City of Detroit, MI - By letter dated November 25, 1998, the City of Detroit, formally requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance in providing approximately 1,100 feet of emergency streambank protection along the Detroit River, to protect a City of Detroit's island park (Belle Isle) from further damage. Planning and design analysis (PDA) is underway. Funds in the amount of $83,609 were expended in FY99. Riverside Drive, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening a portion of Riverside Drive. The riverbank is steep and is severely eroded adjacent to the Riverside Drive. The plans and specifications phase was initiated in August 1999. Funds in the amount of $1,308 were expended in FY99. North Shore Drive, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening a portion of North Shore Drive. The riverbank is steep and is severly eroded adjacent to the North Shore Drive between Parkovash Avenue and Lafayette Boulevard. The plans and specifications phase was initiated in August 1999. Funds in the amount of $29,653 were expended in FY99. Combined Sewer Outfall No. 6, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening CSO #6. The site is located on the south bank of the St. Joseph River between Leland Avenue and Riverside drive. The riverbank is steep and is severely eroded. The plans specifications phase was initiated in August 1999. Funds in the amount of $12,837 were expended in FY99. Leeper Park Island Wall, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening the two drinking water wells located on Leeper Park Island. Several sections of the deteriorated masonry stone wall have completely failed. The plans and specifications phase was initiated in August 1999. Funds in the amount of $12,823 were expended in FY99. Kinnickinnic River, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated May 6, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance in protecting a county road and county sewer outfalls from further deterioration along the Kinnickinnic River. Planning and design analysis (PDA) is underway. Funds in the amount of $45,515 were expended in FY99. 66. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 67. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES 21-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Minnesota Point, Duluth Ship Canal, MN - Accelerated shoreline erosion along Minnesota Point is occurring, as a result of the interruption of along shore littoral transport processes by the Federally maintained navigation structures at Duluth Entry and Superior Entry. A study was initiated in FY97 in response to a request from the City of Duluth. The study addresses structural and non-structural measures to reduce erosion-type damage by shoreline stabilization. The feasibility report continued investigating potential alternatives to resolving the shoreline erosion problem. It is anticipated that the final feasibility report will be completed by June 2000. Funds in the amount of $56,569 were expended in FY99. 68. PROJECT MODIFICATION FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT Project modification activities pursuant to Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Paw Paw River, MI- Funds in the amount of $8,144 were expended in FY99 to continue a feasibility study of Paw Paw River, Michigan. The feasibility study addresses potential solutions to control sea lamprey in the Paw Paw River by use of either fixed-crest or variable crested dam alternatives. The feasibility report is expected to be completed in March 2000. Princeton Dam, Green Lake County, WI - The Princeton Dam was constructed by the Corps of Engineers in 1897 to aid in providing commercial navigation between the Wisconsin River and Green Bay. A request for the Section 1135 study was made on November 14, 1996. A feasibility study was initiated to address modifying the Princeton Dam facility to allow flexibility in controlling water levels that would provide a means of enhancing fishery and aquatic habitat upstream of the Fox River system, in Lake Puckaway. However, in April 1999, the sponsor withdrew its request for assistance due to its capability to meet its potential financial requirements. The study was terminated in FY99. Funds in the amount of $30,422 were expended in FY99. Ecosystem Restoration - Section 204 beneficial use of dredged material in connection with dredging. Projects in connection with dredging use of dredged material activities pursuant to Section 204 of Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended. Cat Island Chain, Brown County, WI - Funds in the amount of $17,547 were expended in FY99 to continue feasibility phase activities for designing restoration techniques to restore the Cat Island entrance to Green Bay Harbor, with its easterly boundary about 150 feet west of the deep-draft navigation channel extending into Green Bay. These techniques are being closely coordinated with State and local entities. Historically, the Cat Island Chain had an average width of about 500 feet and extended northwest for approximately 1-1/2 miles. It has dissipated over the years, such that, it only has an area with a diameter of 400 feet above normal water levels. A feasibility report is expected to be finalized by September 30, 2000. 21st Avenue, West Channel, Duluth, MN - The project is located within St. Louis Bay, Duluth-Superior Harbor, at the extreme western end of the Lake Superior. The 21st Ave, West Channel, study involves the creation of wetlands by construction of a wave barrier to enclose the inlet area and place dredged material below Low Water Datum to create multiple habitat (wildlife refuge and fish habitat). Funds in the amount of $142,756 were expended in FY99 to initiate the Feasibility Phase. Various construction alternatives are being evaluated. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration - Projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects, for the purpose of improving the environment pursuant to Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Koontz Lake, IN - Koontz Lake is a 346-acre public freshwater lake located in Marshal and Stark Counties, IN. The project consists of a one time removal of approximately 190,000 cubic yards of sediments that are 21-40 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT re-suspended by boats and thus adversely impacting the aquatic habitat. Funds in the amount of $12,263 were expended in FY99 to initiate a feasibility study. FLOOD CONTROL 69. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI Location. Clinton River Basin including its tributaries drains an area of 760 square miles in southeastern Michigan and empties into Lake St. Clair. Existing Project. The project consists of a two-mile long spillway channel connecting the Clinton River with Lake St. Clair and a weir at the upstream end of the project, about 9 miles upstream of the river's mouth, in Mount Clemens, MI. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Clinton River Spillway Inter- County Drainage Board operates and maintains the project. Operations During Fiscal Year. Funds in the amount of $3,147 were expended to closeout FY97 inflatable dam contract completed last FY. Total cost to end of FY was $3,278,562. 70. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN Location. Fort Wayne, which is located in northeastern Indiana in Allen County, is in the Maumee River drainage basin. In all, the Maumee basin covers an area of 6,586 square miles. Of this area, 4,856 square miles are in northwest Ohio, 1,260 are in northeast Indiana and 470 are in southeast Michigan. This basin is one of the largest and most important tributaries in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River system. There are four main tributary streams to the Maumee River: the Auglaize, Tiffin, St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph and Tiffin Rivers originate in the hills of southern Michigan and flow southerly to the Maumee. The St. Marys and Auglaize originate in Ohio and flow northward. In the City of Fort Wayne, the St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers join to form the headwaters of the Maumee River. From this point, the Maumee flows northeasterly and empties into Lake Erie at Toledo, Ohio. The central business district is located on the south side of the Maumee and the St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph River bisects primarily residential areas on the north side of the central business district. While some portions of the central business district are prone to flooding in the immediate vicinity of the St. Marys River, the majority of the business district is sufficiently elevated to avoid flood damages. The residential areas, however, are generally low lying and are prone to frequent flooding. Existing Project. The Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana, Flood Control Study was authorized by resolution of the Committee on Public Works, House of Representatives on October 12, 1972. The authorization requested that the Corps determine the advisability of providing improvements for flood control and allied purposes at and in the vicinity of Fort Wayne, Indiana. The study authorization resulted in completion of a Final Feasibility Report entitled "Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana Flood Control Study," dated September 1987, and revised in April 1988, which identified and evaluated a number of different alternatives to flood control in the Fort Wayne area. The Final Feasibility Report also contained the "Final Environmental Impact Statement" for this project. Preparation of the General Design Memorandum began in August 1989 and was approved in December 1993. Construction was authorized in Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Title 1 Public Law 101-640). This project was a Congressionally added new construction start in FY 1994. The Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1994 and construction was initiated in September 1995. The project will provide a 100-year level of flood protection to a large part of the central area of the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana which has experienced numerous flooding events in the past. The project is located along the north side of the St. Marys River, the east and west banks of the St. Joseph River, and the north bank of the Maumee River. Junk Ditch and Spy Run Creek which are tributary to the St. Marys River will also have protection installed or improved along their north and east banks respectively. The project area has been broken into four (4) segments which provide flood protection to various areas within the project limits. 21-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 The West Segment is located along the St. Marys River and the Junk Ditch Tributary. The Central Segment is located along the Spy Run Tributary to the St. Marys River, a short section of the St. Marys River itself (at the confluence with the St. Joseph River), and along the west bank of the St. Joseph River. The East-North Segment is located along the east bank of the St. Joseph River and the East-South Segment is located along the north bank of the Maumee River. The total project length is approximately 54,000 feet. The project consists of several types of flood protection improvements. The most common type of flood protection improvements proposed are earth levees. The levees proposed are to have turf or rock protected slopes depending on the available space for their construction. Levees account for approximately 63 percent of the total project length. Concrete floodwalls are proposed in those areas where insufficient space exists to construct levees due to site constraints. Concrete flood walls account for 20 percent of the project length. An additional eight percent of the project length consists of a combination of a '/2 Reduced levee and concrete L-Wall. The remaining length is composed of various types of road closures (stoplogs, clay dikes and high curbs), and 3,000 feet in several areas which do not require improvements due to adequate existing surface grades. The fully funded total project cost estimate is $49,737,000. The Federal cost is $36,988,000 and the non-Federal cost is $12,749,000. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the project are the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed with the Mayor of Fort Wayne and the Allen County Board of Commissioners on 22 August 1994. Under the terms of the PCA, the non-federal sponsors shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, of the total project costs attributed to flood control purposes. This shall consist of all required lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations for the project; and a cash contribution equal to a minimum of five percent of the total project flood control cost. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) has approved a credit in the amount of $1,123,500 under Section 104 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This will be applied to the non-Federal share of the project flood control cost. In addition to the above, the non-federal sponsor shall provide 50 percent of the total project recreation costs, 100 percent of all betterment costs, and shall operate and maintain all works after completion. Cash contributions totaling $6,201,000 have been provided through the end of FY 99. Real estate requirements for the East-South Segment were completed on July 27, 1995, East-North Segment on July 19, 1996, Central Segment on November 11, 1997 and the West Segment on April 8, 1999. Operations During Fiscal Year. Expenditures of $6,423,756 were made to continue construction for the East-North and Central Segmenst; and to complete the plans and specifications and award a construction contract for the West Segment. The East-South Segment was transferred to theCity of Fort Wayne and Allen County on February 8, 1999. Of the funds expended, $1,737,371 was contributed by the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. Total cost to end of FY was $37,331,558. 71. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI Location. River drains an irregularly shaped area of about 220 square miles in Bay, Gladwin, Midland, and Saginaw Counties in east-central Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay 2 miles northwest of Saginaw River. (See Geological Survey Bay City quadrangle and NOAA Nautical Charts 14867 and 14863.) Existing Project. Provides for deepening about 1.8 miles of river channel between the river mouth and Euclid Street Bridge; altering Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge by addition of two 45.9 foot spans; protecting by riprapping the channel bottom through Euclid Street Bridge, existing piers at Henry Street Bridge and Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge; and a number of utility relocations. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986, dated Nov. 17, 1986, Section 837, modified the flood control project on the Kawkawlin River, MI, that was authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. (See Table 21-b) for authorizing legislation.) 21-42 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: An adjustment of -$19,710 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Supervision and administration to closeout the contract cost $8,274. Of the funds expended, $7,634 were contributed by the Bay County Board of Commissioners. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,903,807 of which $1,204,559 was for new work (includes $204,559 contributed funds) and $699,248 for maintenance (includes $228,748 contributed funds). 72. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing Project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non- Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of cost of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986, PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on Dec.15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting work for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled 21-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 storage of flood waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local Cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on Nov. 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished Feb. 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on Sep. 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on Jun. 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated Jan. 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated Aug. 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Funds in the amount of $94,726 were expended in FY99 to finalize preparation of the design analysis, plans and specifications, and to advertise and award a construction contract for the replacement of the inflatable dam. The total estimated cost for the project is $875,000 for design, contract award and construction. A Letter Report and PCA Supplement were approved by Headquarters and executed by ASA(CW). A construction contract was awarded to D.N. West in the amount of $604,000. Construction is expected to be complete in FY 2000. The operation and maintenance responsibility will then be transferred to the City of Flint. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303), Section 329, Saginaw River, Michigan@ modified Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (PL 85-500) to include as part of the Project the design and construction of an inflatable dam. The Energy and Water Development Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-62) provided $875,000 under the Operation & Maintenance, General appropriation for the preservation, operation, maintenance and care of the Project, to replace the inflatable dam. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY99 was $30,586,207, of which $24,928,359 was for new work (includes $173,000 contributed funds) and $5,657,848 for maintenance. 73. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing Project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of 21-44 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,331. Total costs to the end of FY were $816,592 of which $365,642 was for new work and $450,950 for maintenance. 74. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT Fort Wayne, IN Red Run, Clinton River, MI Rouge River, MI Burr Oak, Praire River, MI 1999 Flint River, MI DATE OF INSPECTION Apr 1999 May 1999 Aug 1999 Sep Sep 1999 Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $178,384. Total cost to the end of FY was $3,147,922. 75. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. 76. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and PL 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Project and Location Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation FY Costs for Sep. 30, 1999 $ 262,107 37,712 411,138 Advance Measures $2,242,748 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Cass River, Spaulding Township, MI- By letter dated December 21, 1998, the Township of Spaulding, formally requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under Section 205 to implement a flood relief solution for the purpose of providing flood protection to the community of Spaulding Township, Saginaw County, MI. Funds in the amount of $19,317 were expended in FY99 to initiate the feasibility phase. Menominee River, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated April 30, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under the Section 205 authority to investigate non-structural alternatives for the purpose of reducing flooding in the Menominee River. Funds in the amount of $22,317 were expended in FY99 to initiate the feasibility phase. Root River, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated April 30, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under the Section 205 authority to investigate non-structural alternatives for the purpose of reducing flooding in the Root River. Funds in the amount of $8,088 were expended in FY99 to initiate the feasibility phase. Oak Creek, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated April 30, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under the Section 205 authority to investigate non-structural alternatives for the purpose of reducing flooding in the Oak Creek Watershed. Funds in the amount of $8,907 were expended in FY99 to initiate the feasibility phase. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Galien River, Berrien County, MI - The initial 21-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 evaluation was to determine the magnitude of log and debris jams in the river and the extent of flood damages caused by these problems. It was determined during the investigation that the project was not economically feasible, and the study was subsequently terminated. Funds in the amount of $1,720 were used for termination activities in FY99. Aquatic plant control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL89- 298). None. 77. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS AND INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES Field Operations. As a continuing and ongoing mission, the Detroit District conducts hydraulic flowmeasurements throughout the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River system. This capability is unique among the Corps Districts (and other federal agencies) on the Great Lakes. During FY99, the Detroit District conducted current velocity and discharge measurements on the St. Marys, St. Clair, Detroit and Niagara Rivers. During FY99 the District continued gathering hydraulic data using the ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) instrumentation at several sections on the upper and lower Detroit River, the St. Clair River and the Niagara River. These hydraulic data sets are currently being used to develop two-dimensional flow models of the river systems, and to help refine the flow retardation estimates for weed conditions through the growing season. As an ongoing mission, during the winter months the District monitors the extent of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers to detect possible ice jams and potential flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies, including the National Weather Service and the Coast Guard. Currently, data are obtained through phone line interrogation of these gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal computers. These systems provide water level information to the District office within minutes of data collection. International Activities. The Detroit District has successfully supported the International Joint Commission (IJC) for many years. This has included numerous engineering and scientific assignments supporting the Commission's boards of control, working committees, and study boards. The following activities were conducted by the Detroit District, specifically for the IJC Boards and Committees: a. Semi-Annual Meetings. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the semi-annual meetings of the three Great Lakes Boards of Control. They also attended the spring appearances of the Boards before the IJC, in Washington, D.C. in April 1999, and the fall appearances, in Ottawa, Ontario in November 1999. b. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of this Board. In support of the U.S. section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based upon the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes using the approved operating plan, Plan 1977-A. Plan 1977-A has been in operational use since June 1990. The District's program to evaluate the hydraulic rating of the Compensating Works in the St. Marys River was reinitiated in FY99. During FY99 flow measurements were conducted in the power canals at Sault Ste. Marie, MI and Ontario as part of an ongoing program to verify the ratings of the power plants. The Board is required by the IJC to hold at least one public meeting each year to inform them of the Board's activities to gain feedback regarding their work. As such, the District participated in the Board's FY99 annual 21-46 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT meeting held in Sault Ste. Marie, ON. The District also disseminates extensive Board information to the public and the media via news releases and by maintaining the Board's web page. c. International Niagara Board of Control, International Niagara Working Committee, and International Niagara Committee. The District provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to this Board and its Committees. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office is a member of the Niagara Working Committee. Under the auspices of the Committee, the Detroit District, with Canada, computes, coordinates, and publishes the monthly flows in the Niagara River. During FY99, the Detroit District and the Water Survey of Canada conducted a series of discharge measurements in the upper Niagara River at the International Railway Bridge Section as part of a continuing effort for verification of Lake Erie outflow equations. Information to date indicates that the existing equations are adequate during average flow ranges, but still require verification at the very high and very low extremes. Based upon the results of the recent measurements, the equations are being reevaluated. Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River at the Falls, the District is involved with periodic verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the total flow over the American and Canadian Falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. Discharge measurements for the Ashland Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years. Measurements were made in FY98, and the next series is scheduled for FY01. Measurements are scheduled for the American Falls Section in FY00, in accordance with the five-year schedule. d. Lake Michigan Potential Damages Study (LMPDS). In response to one of the recommendations from the IJC's 1993 Levels Reference Study, in FY99 the Detroit District continued a potential damage study of the Lake Michigan shoreline. The ultimate goal of this study is to create a modeling procedure and engineering/management tool for estimating economic effects of lake level changes and related social, environmental, and cultural impacts. The LMPDS modeling approaches are expected to be the framework for economic assessments for each of the other Great Lakes. The LMPDS is also intended to be a forum for concerted information system development between international, federal, state, county, township, and municipal governance about the resource base that is commonly shared. In order to focus modeling and other FY99 activities and to ensure the methods developed are appropriate for application to the whole lake, five prototype counties were selected for detailed analysis in FY99. These include Ottawa and Allegan counties in Michigan, and Ozaukee, Sheboygan, and Manitowoc counties in Wisconsin. They were selected because they contain a number of the LMPDS site-specific study areas being examined. They also have wealth of data and information available from other initiatives being carried out by state agencies and academic institutions. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. In FY99, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office was the U.S. Secretary to this Committee. Other Office personnel also held membership on the three subcommittees: the Vertical Control-Water Levels, Hydraulics, and Hydrology. The District continued its support of Committee operations pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. District efforts have also continued to closely coordinate the formats of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. In addition, the District continued working with NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (GLERL) with regard to improving the computational procedures currently employed in the Great Lakes 6-month water level forecast. The District is also discussed improvements to its biweekly Connecting Channel Depths forecast. The desired product would be a web-based weekly forecast demonstrating the least, greatest, and mean channel depths at various points on the St. Marys, St. Clair - 21-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Detroit Rivers, and the St. Lawrence River system. Water Control Data System. In FY99, the Detroit District continued to provide an extensive variety of water control products, for the entire Great Lakes system, based on the water level gage network, on its Internet home page. Weather information and meteorological data are also received and processed within the District and available on its web page. The District has 31 active data collection platforms (DCPs) and plans to upgrade and possibly expand the network, based upon an on-going review of its water level gaging program. Great Lakes Information Management. In FY99, the District continued the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS contains multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a corporate data base to support various District operations and studies. The District has completed a comprehensive GIS containing current U.S. shoreline land uses, under the IJC Levels Reference Study. Historical recession rate data, shore-type classification, shore protection and sub-aqueous material profiles support shoreline damage estimates and erosion modeling. In support of the USEPA/USACE Interagency Agreement for the Southeast Michigan Initiative (SEMI), the District has developed a desktop GIS to provide a multi-agency decision support system for environmental planning and restoration. To date the SEMI GIS covers eight major watersheds, and contains all contaminated sediment data sets collected by all U.S. and Canadian agencies for the last 20 years. Great Lakes Hydrology. Water supply forecasts are used routinely by the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office in forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, over-water precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by the staff of the Office. Great Lakes Water Levels. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office continued to make routine short-term (15 days to one month) and long-term (six months) Great Lakes still water level forecasts. These forecasts are distributed in the form of weekly, bimonthly and monthly news releases and bulletins. The Monthly Bulletin of Lake Levels for the Great Lakes, containing a six month projection of Great Lakes water levels, has a circulation of about 10,000 copies per month. Included with the monthly bulletin on a quarterly basis is an informational enclosure entitled Great Lakes Update, which consists of various topics of interest pertaining to the Great Lakes, such as frequently asked questions, information on water regulation plans, and incidental information on Great Lakes hydraulics and hydrology. With water levels on the Great Lakes being below average during FY99 and continuing to recede, Office personnel provided extensive technical information and expertise regarding water level forecasts, recorded lake levels, and the potential impacts of these water levels to many interested parties, such as members of Congress, state and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners, and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of the District's web page, telephonic and written responses to inquiries, presentations to various interest groups, and interviews with the news media. Daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are currently available on the District's Internet home page. Forecasted and historical water level data are also available on the web. In concert with the Great Lakes Commission, the Detroit District in FY99, completed "Living with the Lakes", a 40 page booklet which offers information and advice on Great Lakes water levels and shoreline protection. Great Lakes boaters and shoreline property owners have seen dramatic lake level fluctuations in recent years. This booklet answer questions regarding the causes of these fluctuations, how the levels are forecasted, where the outflows are controlled within the system, and how shoreline property can be protected. The total costs for FY99 under the Surveillance of 21-48 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Northern Boundary Waters was $2,778,604, and under the International Water Studies, $299,533. MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 78. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous Project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State Locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from Jun. 9, 1881, to Nov. 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for the MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Sep. 1, 1881, to Jun. 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Aug. 3, 1896, Davis Lock from Oct. 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from Sep. 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200-foot by 110-foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 601.1 feet and at upstream side of locks is 600.6 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 578.4 feet and Lake Huron is 577.5 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is $174,200,000 Federal and $93,800,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, 21-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 structures, and improvements made necessary by the project. (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); (d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $67,000,000. The estimated cash contribution of $67,000,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $26,800,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and (f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal Facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was in caretaker status) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 297 days during the period 1 October 1998 through 30 September 1999. A total of 9,377 vessels, aggregating 83,182,418 short tons of freight and 146,430 passengers passed through the MacArthur and Poe Locks. (The Davis Lock was not used in FY99.) Total cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks during the FY was $12,358,409, which includes; $532,000 in contract cost for repairs to the Poe Lock monolith joint and stoplog recess awarded last FY with $38,436 for supervision and administration of the contract. The contract was 14.7% complete at the end of the FY; $103,616 to complete preparation of plans and specifications for major repairs to the MacArthur Lock (Phase I). A contract was awarded and completed for this work in the amount of $2,655,473 with $29,363 for engineering and design during construction; $224,493 for preparation of plans and specifications for major repairs to the MacArthur Lock (Phase II). A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $2,328,975. No work was performed this FY. However, the contractor was paid $25,999 to cover bonds with $130,383 for supervision and administration of these contracts; $45,911 for renovation of the Davis Lock pump well sluice gate; and $55,767 to continue plans and specifications for repairs to the Davis and Sabin Locks valves and piping. Powerhouse and equipment: A total of 165,291,564 kilowatt-hours of power was generated this FY. Income from the sale of power, sent to the U.S. Treasury, amounted to $1,820,311. Total cost of operation and maintenance for two hydroelectric powerhouses during the FY was $2,830,277. Total cost also includes assistance from the Hydroelectric Design Center for continued benchmark testing of the generators and turbines, a powerhouse rehabilitation report, preparation of plans and specifications for 3A runner, unit #10 shaft runner, and installation of automated governor, excitation & fire suppression system, at a final cost of $75,164; supervision and administration for closeout of FY93 generator rewind of Units 1 thru 3 contract cost $1,998; Supervision and administration to closeout the FY94 rehabilitation of hydroelectric Unit 3A contract cost $1,678; A contract was awarded and completed this FY for Unit 10 shaft & guide bearings in the amount of 21-50 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT $320,576 with $4,577 for supervision and administration of the contract; rehabilitation of governor, excitation, fire suppression system, and installation contracts cost $1,583,369 with $9,792 for engineering and design during construction, and $104,600 for supervision and administration of the contracts; and engineering and design for Unit 10/trash rack was initiated at a cost of $5,359. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, environmental activities, real estate, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $2,431,939, which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $314,666 and a service contract for security measures for $414,725. Winter and extended navigation season studies, ice measurements, and weather monitoring cost $152,968. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was performed by hired labor using the U.S. Derrickbarge NICOLET and the U.S. Cranebarge HARVEY at a cost of $2,205,807. Other miscellaneous items: Underground storage tank contract repairs cost $19,844. Closeout of FY97 switch gear assembly "B&F" replacement contract cost $1,701. Engineering and design for rehabilitation of the Administration and Davis buildings was completed at a cost of $47,591. A contract for this work (roof replacement) was awarded and completed this FY in the amount of $597,159. Another contract for this work (the rest of the buildings) was awarded in the amount of $1,967,000. The work was 51% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $1,000,000. Engineering and design during construction, and supervision and administration of these contracts cost $117,526. Repair of armor old disposal sites performed by hired labor cost $1,134. Engineering and design for armor old disposal islands were completed in the amount of $68,787. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $1,005,466. No work was performed this FY. However, the contractor was paid $25,999 to cover the cost of bonds. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $7,980. Engineering and design for security system cost $5,000. A contract was awarded and completed to install barriers at a cost of $111,333. Another contract was awarded for a security camera/detection system in the amount of $113,000. No work was performed on this contract. However, the contractor was paid $25,999 to cover the cost of bonds. Engineering and design for major repair of the Rock Cut, East Guide Wall, continued at a cost of $36,746. Engineering and design was initiated for park landscaping at a cost of $2,776. Recreational facilities: Information center, visitors center, comfort stations, park fountain, and observation and overlook platforms were operated and maintained at a cost of $203,318 which includes a custodial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $30,502. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Visitors Center numbered 476,633. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 454,973. Total visitors to the Soo Locks park numbered 618,763. A grand total of 765,193 people (includes tour boat visitors of 146,430) visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 99 amounted to $22,252,293. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $531,450,821, of which $160,657,071 was for new work and $370,793,750 for maintenance (includes $340,400 contributed funds). GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 79. SURVEYS FY99 funds in the amount of $4,957 were expended to continue the Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Fox River, WI. (Correction: FY98 annual report expenditures were $23,372.) FY99 funds in the amount of $5,463 and $82,398 were expended for reconnaissance studies for Koontz Lake, IN 21-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 and Paw Paw River, MI respectively. (Reconnaissance study initiated in FY98 for Koontz Lake, IN - $94,537.) Coordination Studies with other Agencies include: Special Investigations, $47,824 which includes engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; FERC, $4,130; and Interagency Water Resources Development, $8,705; North American Water Fowl Management Planning, $1,738; National Estuary Studies, $4,069; and Cooperation with other Water Resource agencies, $3,482. Great Lakes Remedial Action, $200,311; and Section 22, Planning Assistance to States and Tribes: Federal amount shown, studies cost shared equally with partner include: Oneida Tribe, GIS, WI - $19,349; Oneida Tribe, Watershed, WI - $35; Menominee Tribe, WI - $1,104; Potawatomi Tribe, WI, GIS - $52,348; Big Muskego Lake, WI - $65,000; Isabella Co. Structures, MI - $29,181; Dearborn Heights Structures, MI - $35,649; Vassar City, MI GIS - $45,400; Allegan County, MI GIS - $68,000; Parks & Rec MI Digital Orthos - $39,939, Milwaukee County, WI Breakwater - $68,589; Milwaukee County, MMSD, WI Topo - $22,000 ; City of Superior, WI, Breakwater - $8,711. 80. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS AND HARBORS, REPLACEMENT LOCK Funds in the amount of $497,178 were expended in FY99 on preconstruction engineering and design work activities. The project, as authorized in the WRDA of 1986 and the WRDA of 1990, calls for constructing a second lock able to accommodate the largest vessels engaged in Great Lakes commerce. The authorized dimensions are 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth. The authorized cost (1985) is $227,428,000. The new lock would replace two existing locks that are only 80 feet in width and 23 feet in depth. The project had not been funded earlier due to lack of a local sponsor. The WRDA of 1996 eased the cost-sharing requirements for a non-Federal sponsor. Given the delay in initiating preconstruction engineering and design, the initial work effort is preparing a limited re-evaluation report to assure that the project remains economically justified. ST. MARYS RIVER, VIDAL SHOALS The project, as authorized in Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101- 640), consists of deepening an additional foot of overdraft between Point Louise Turn and the Locks, Sault Sainte Marie, MI, consistent with the channels upstream of Point Louise Turn. No work was done on this project between FY94 and FY98. In October 1998, the Lake Carriers' Association requested the Corps of Engineers re-open this project utilizing a revised dredging plan. This plan was analyzed for reasonableness and safety; and a model study was completed that confirmed that the proposed channel widths are safe for two-way traffic. Funds in the amount of $126,920 were expended in FY99 to initiate a limited re-evaluation report, environmental assessment and plans and specification. 81. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services. FY99 costs in the amount of $309,026 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program; Unit - $69,326, Technical Services - $39,111, National Flood Proofing Committee - $9,387, Quick Responses - $4,989, Guides, Pamphlets & Supt Studies - $85; Specials Studies for; Chassel, MI, Flood Plain Study - $51,977, Ann Arbor, MI, Flood Plain Study - $59,225, Germania Dam Wisconsin DamBreak Analysis - $170, HEC-HMS Workshop in Indiana - $24,288, HEC-HMS Workshop in Wisconsin - $22,585,HEC-HMS Workshop in Michigan - $1,502, HEC-RAS Workshop in Michigan - $24,061, HEC-RAS Workshop in Wisconsin - $2,505; and HEC-WEAP Workshop, MI - $-185. Flood Insurance Studies. One Flood Insurance Studies 21-52 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT was completed in FY99 for the Detroit Districts at a cost of $29,946. No new Flood Insurance Studies were initiated in FY 99. FY99 ongoing coordination costs for other studies at Macomb, Wayne and Kent Counties, Michigan were $146,331, $3,593 and $11,733 respectively. Costs in FY99 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program for Survey of Temporary Benchmarks, MI, amounted to $27,710. In FY99, Hydrologic Studies cost $4,204, and International Water Studies, $25,079. 21-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 1. Alpena Harbor, MI 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI 3. Ashland Harbor, WI 4. Big Bay Harbor, MI 5. Caseville Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 9,073 9,073 2,174 52,238 2,174 52,238 125,000 144,000 244,900 124,331 139,272 251,196 1,075 5,623 39,000 29,890 0 0 (8,213) 1,269 75,900 75,865 93,400 93,377 0 0 62,300 62,045 0 396,9432 0 396,9432 (2,051) 20,054 1,603 20,054 0 0 183,964 222,684 0 0 1,531 1,531 3,769 3,769 897 897 15,053 14,978 15,102 1,731,378 15,030 1,731,306 21-54 337,394' 337,394' 1,199,662 1,199,627 5,218,329 5,218,320 1,695,645 1,695,645 4,252,498 4,252,192 1,520,632 1,520,557 293,657 293,657 293,657 293,657 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 6. Cedar River Harbor, MI 7. Charlevoix Harbor, MI 8. Clinton River, MI Contributed Funds 9. Cornucopia Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major ( or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 15,000 19,928 0 733 123,000 684,000 122,573 374,769 0 408,000 0 408,000 1,798,000 2,605,000 2,078,423 2,575,765 O 180,623 0 180,623 222,018 244,000 372,700 223,271 243,814 375,119 151,100 10,503,437 151,195 10,503,420 1,129,396 1,129,396 260,0463 260,0463 0 289,7524 0 289,7524 1,696 124,000 3,647 108,163 10,089 26,384 11,329 7,451,674 11,234 7,451,579 0 462,653 0 462,653 10,586 112,006 (8,266) 17,571 102,828 1,559 23,332 23,304 1,203,547 1,203,519 21-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 10. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds 11. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI 12. Fox River, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 76,877,357 s 76,877,357 s 4,976,000 3,907,000 2,527,500 4,980,579 3,869,796 2,588,228 0 0 0 0 (315) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,298,000 3,499,000 4,157,000 3,264,326 3,523,702 4,158,386 2,436,600 166,370,5856 2,437,212 166,370,1256 361,235 361,235 16,894,6587 16,894,658' 331,685 331,685 2,857,780 77,395,4728 2,905,406 77,389,564 0 11,555,410 0 11,555,410 3,753,3349 3,753,3349 2,185,000 2,384,000 2,740,802 2,117,297 2,197,791 2,968,374 3,112,700 62,023,22810'1 3,191,248 62,000,511111 13. Frankfort Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 0 1,923,450 0 1,923,450 31,709 31,709 21-56 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 13. Frankfort Harbor, MI (Continued) 14. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 15. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 25,707 26,778 44,122 240,724 43,343 241,542 49,300 11,381,18412 49,846 11,381,12312 0 0 0 0 0 0 274,776 274,776 1,283,46913 1,283,46913 175,000 175,000 1,244,000 1,305,000 1,230,200 1,262,814 1,310,152 1,225,812 879,700 33,267,210' 4 888,608 33,266,539'14 0 0 68,000 105,000 56,000 64,204 104,008 60,795 0 0 2,316 5,890 21-57 1,187 14,708 1,187 14,708 102,900 104,491 134,500 134,437 15,585 15,585 2,686,761 2,686,753 813,613 813,613 266,037 266,037 63,528 63,528 2,176,610 2,176,547 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 16. Green Bay Harbor, WI 17. Greilickville Harbor, MI 18. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 19. Harrisville Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 9,946,395 s 5,16 0 9,946,3951516 1,647,000 1,928,663 2,182,900 1,659,951 1,935,240 2,183,373 15,480 19,146 5,261 5,261 8,120 8,040 2,970,100 2,954,028 9,540 9,596 50,160,10117 50,139,53417 369,55718 369,55718 315,630 315,606 1,200,598 1,200,598 6,645 9,681 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,895 2,856 21-58 97,090 519,800 83,776 528,224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56,001 (15,992) 35,749 4,515 9,012 15,605,958'9 14,836 15,605,89319 0 194,504 0 194,504 0 1,849,938 0 1,849,938 5,730 5,730 287,454 287,454 502,000 502,000 1,328,255 1,328,177 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 19. Harrisville Harbor, MI (Continued) 20. Holland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 21. Inland Route, MI Contributed Funds Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 88,000 88,000 736,12220 736,12220 35,705 35,705 621,000 621,000 516,000 1,567,000 302,100 530,203 1,570,839 302,941 54,000 56,002 74,000 59,000 71,800 62,029 316,900 26,972,40321 319,462 26,972,23021 67,900 70,651 2,267,815 2,267,794 502,452 502,452 770,222 770,222 148,000 148,000 39,000 38,179 27,000 10,400 14,634 23,918 539,700 3,747,51622 539,602 3,747,33522 22. Kenosha Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost 21-59 988,96923,24 988,96923,24 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 22. Kenosha Harbor, WI (Continued) 23. Kewaunee Harbor, WI Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 48,000 193,000 54,922 47,903 186,927 61,576 436,915 11,690,23625 437,939 11,690,19325 O 1,270,275 0 1,270,275 New Work Approp. Cost 758,33326 758,33326 24. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 25. Knife River Harbor, MN 26. La Pointe Harbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 242,000 200,000 219,800 240,319 205,791 220,784 279,800 10,736,23027 281,617 10,736,16127 0 0 485,000 282,000 477,014 481,965 285,777 483,633 0 0 944 944 0 0 0 0 1,035 1,035 0 0 141,000 97,518 628 628 617,300 617,300 5,974,141 5,974,141 440,500 29,065,22928 443,832 29,056,45028 (25,000) 18,482 2,310 2,310 528,945 528,945 313,193 313,193 139,874 139,874 21-60 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 26. La Pointe Harbor, MI (Continued) 27. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 28. Leland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 29. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 2,421 2,421 16,383 16,383 0 0 585 585 110,000 102,000 25,200 127,387 77,272 51,571 289,000 146,126 231,800 288,797 119,883 257,184 190,430 44,000 (23,121) 178,746 33,100 213 11,952 11,901 180,857 180,806 7,675,35729 7,675,35729 117,400 14,009,27130 114,177 14,005,96430 118,300 121,344 27,639 27,634 672,950 672,950 354,139 354,139 3,575,722 3,575,718 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 838,159 836,277 21-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 29. Lexington Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 30. Little Lake Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 31. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 32. Manistee Harbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 99,000 97,004 40,000 11,000 37,624 19,051 63,000 135,000 53,300 69,239 129,245 60,422 0 0 0 0 349,000 210,000 699,200 349,771 139,849 756,673 10,000 30,000 9,927 29,920 0 0 277,000 277,029 21-62 44,000 45,363 2,040,987 2,040,976 542,808 542,808 57,670 57,670 131,300 4,618,772 130,918 4,618,120 7,912,202 ' 7,912,2023' 620,000 620,000 1,706,900 19,693,84732 1,722,891 19,693,75732 24,900 19,906 782,240 777,093 357,913 357,913 2,696,52233 2,696,52233 73,961 458,262 66,394 471,806 259,100 12,007,01534 259,050 12,006,95234 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 32. Manistee Harbor, MI (Continued) 33. Manistique Harbor, MI 34. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds Contributed Funds 35. Marquette Harbor, MI Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work AcpoProp. ost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 1,374,164 1,374,164 1,299,355 5 1,299,35535 186,000 51,600 123,739 113,446 235,975 2,730,558 236,105 2,730,273 0 316,333 0 316,333 2,048,91436 2,048,91436 1,911,130 1,911,130 149,000 129,000 208,100 120,781 161,987 210,525 0 400 7,399 0 9,206 0 185,900 12,027,42037 187,779 12,027,39337 9,206 0 73,905 47,860 0 1,282,89328 0 1,282,89338 (4,232) 3,415 3,441 238,411 3,441 238,140 36,400 3,178,55939 36,157 3,178,045 39 21-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 35. Marquette Harbor, MI (Continued) 36. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI 37. Milwaukee Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 38. Monroe Harbor, MI Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 465,757 465,757 533,47640 533,47640 36,762 36,762 28,042 153,000 38,000 26,451 147,871 44,764 144,820 3,698,69941' 144,748 3,698,62741 1,351,852 1,351,852 8,231,02442 8,231,02442 4,212,000 3,003,000 1,319,500 4,247,207 2,977,783 1,354,333 783,800 52,558,53743 767,988 52,529,31243 0 0 322,471 322,471 12,715,560 12,715,560 687,340 687,340 21-64 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 38. Monroe Harbor, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds Contributed Funds 39. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 40. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 300,000 300,000 149,000 672,000 195,200 155,351 673,383 196,078 1,008,700 60,000,45144 1,008,680 60,000,37644 0 0 0 0 0 0 660,000 681,616 168,000 168,780 249,84945 249,84945 2,912,11046 2,912,11046 105,000 105,000 93,000 303,200 88,875 304,572 0 41 160,000 157,407 494,700 10,672,34047 501,924 10,672,24647 (1,100) 3,265,600 2,993 3,265,525 13,824,300 13,824,300 1,285,716 1,285,716 0 0 0 1,186,467 0 1,186,467 331,000 359,887 38,000 36,084 8,655 19,240 172,000 5,406,05048 172,016 5,406,03048 21-65 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 41. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 42. Pentwater Harbor, MI 43. Petoskey Harbor, MI 44. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost 953,90349 953,90349 724,000 1,475,000 599,000 769,352 1,487,371 609,765 829,200 22,836,085 s0� 829,049 22,834,43250 0 179,899 0 179,899 424,000 2,835,000 1,523,900 421,189 2,810,345 1,556,995 50,000 106,075 41,646 114,073 135,780 140,277 0 0 0 0 0 (5,459) 0 0 0 0 (4,688) 1,857 862,600 10,479,767 862,811 10,479,580 236,825 237,162 123,839 123,839 962,588 962,569 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 0 336,000 0 336,000 11,500 11,579 2,343,2415 2,343,23951 115,000 115,000 21-66 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 44. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 45. Port Washington Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 46. Port Wing Harbor, WI 47. Portage Lake Harbor, MI 48. Rouge River, MI 49. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 72,000 61,258 5,718 7,072 6,109 7,143 6,000 10,621 0 0 0 0 33,265 164,500 30,469 165,735 24,898 258,932 24,898 252,852 130.079 406,829 131,414 402,505 84,300 90,648 39,200 45,241 1,191,450 1,191,371 2,582,20452 2,582,20452 1,624,000 1,624,000 135,200 3,406,407s3 135,696 3,405,320s3 63,393 63,393 (8,781) 1,439,910 (2,778) 1,439,834 256,129 256,129 33,837 2,908,886 33,848 2,908,619 675,25154 675,25154 99,000 352,000 457,900 102,572 357,367 458,313 549,300 38,036,459ss 549,376 38,036,454ss 14,917,12756 14,917,12756 21-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 49. Saginaw River, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds 50. St. Clair River, MI 51. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 52. Saugatuck Harbor & Kalamazoo River, MI New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 13,600 13,600 1,861,000 1,902,000 1,020,400 1,839,729 1,843,746 1,112,917 2,077,350 79,755,00257 2,091,979 79,753,64957 19,213,246 19,213,246 829,000 442,000 826,800 812,184 453,256 812,947 789,100 27,433,00858 823,195 27,431,68858 976,48559 976,4855 828,000 828,000 825,000 1,009,000 596,400 801,974 1,036,485 596,456 712,000 448,000 296,000 719,034 447,407 301,120 900,200 20,930,41360 902,707 20,925,36360 175,000 180,610 0 0 0 0 223,000 272,000 88,700 220,807 260,414 108,508 3,330,470 3,333,922 8,266,451 8,266,306 962,216 962,216 364,52761 364,52761 7,796,34862 7,796,15962 21-68 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 53. Sebewaing River, MI 54. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 55. Silver Bay Harbor, MN Contributed Funds 56. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 476,968 471,879 20,000 14,804 0 0 (8,717) 1,483 0 0 83,000 106,000 193,300 87,167 105,775 194,224 0 60,054 0 1,923,174 35,573 35,573 186,600 4,182,97863 186,645 4,182,93863 69,200 70,945 0 496,461 1,775,000 (537,000) 531,352 688,628 1,136,08864 1,136,08864 9,252,17065 9,252,11765 609,028 609,028 0 2,600,000 1 2,600,000 (2,765) 15,255 1,235,235 1,235,235 452,42666 452,42666 0 532,000 0 532,000 38,933 40,632 0 38 99,003 80,227 85,430 53,693 190,000 189,999 140,702 170,347 129,300 131,091 6,330,47167 6,320,00967 1,936,233 1,936,141 21-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 56. South Haven Harbor, MI (Continued) 57. Sturgeon Bay, WI, and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 1,632,076 1,632,076 1,059,72268 1,059,72268 114,000 305,000 75,900 117,970 302,690 79,140 247,800 10,914,27169 238,157 10,904,13269 884,899 884,899 58. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 59. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 1,119,000 294,000 59,360 1,103,450 305,405 63,946 (16) 8,994,571"7 1,478 8,992,25771 58,057 58,057 0 207,862 0 207,862 249,700 249,700 122,703 1,929,037 5,266,000 108,482 1,933,426 5,277,393 697,300 10,843,894 699,199 10,843,847 21-70 New Work Approp. Cost 360,32070 360,32070 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 59. White Lake Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 60. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI 69. Clinton River Spillway, MI 70. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN Contributed Funds 71. Kawkawlin River, MI Contributed Funds Contributed Funds Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost 190,000 210,090 0 0 1,475 1,475 0 0 0 0 16,013 16,013 0 150,000 1,139,347 600,581 0 0 0 0 1,487 1,487 0 13,816 4,600,000 6,474,000 10,615,000 4,568,246 6,352,932 10,655,342 780,000 1,150,000 2,800,000 650,630 1,252,707 2,502,554 157,000 3,000 53,669 80,201 157,000 107,151 (3,500) 1,170,115 0 1,170,019 0 0 7,833 7,747 0 3,147 771,639 771,639 447,764 447,677 3,286,008 3,278,563 4,730,000 31,304,000 4,686,386 31,135,878 1,200,000 6,201,000 1,737,370 6,195,680 (45,200) (19,070) (42,215) 7,634 1,000,000 1,000,000 204,559 204,559 470,500 470,500 228,748 228,748 21-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 72. Saginaw River-1958 Act Flint, MI 73. Sebewaing River, MI 77. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters 78. St. Marys River, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,874,167 10,000 4,441 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 875,000 126,842 75,174 10,000 (14,300) 3,582 0 1,945,000 3,030,316 2,965,000 1,916,808 3,067,335 2,844,210 0 94,726 3,800 4,331 24,755,359 24,755,359 173,000 173,000 6,375,000 5,657,848 365,642 365,642 450,955 450,950 0 0 2,969,100 68,005,75172 3,088,137 67,930,36872 160,657,07173 160,657,07173 17,362,700 16,075,300 16,535,691 17,630,563 15,638,123 16,704,004 0 170,400 0 (319) 21,983,900 370,539,91274,75 22,252,293 370,453,67074'7s 340,400 340.080 21-72 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep. 30, 1999 'Includes $18,889 for previous projects. Excludes $56,500 for contributed funds. Includes $25,500 for previous projects. 4Includes $3,796,180 for previous projects. 5 Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. Includes $42,470,585 for diked disposal. 7Includes $1,547,195 for previous projects. 8lncludes $1,556,249 for diked disposal. Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. "Includes $89,309 for previous projects. "Includes $25,990 expended for M&O of Dams. '"-Includes $1,204,500 for diked disposal. 3Includes $311,329 for previous projects. 14Includes $13,437 for previous project and $780,400 for diked disposal. "Includes $506,437 for previous projects. '6Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. "Includes $8,918 for previous projects and $7,642,642 for diked disposal. 'Excludes $127,000 contributed funds. "Includes $243,100 for diked disposal. 2'"Includes $176,620 for previous projects. 'Includes $127,598 for previous projects and $1,663,300 for diked disposal. 22Includes $404,300 for diked disposal. 23Includes $453,839 for previous projects. 24Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. -Includes $21,818 for previous projects and $4,378,600 for diked disposal. 26Includes $149,312 for previous projects. -'Includes $88,364 for previous projects and $2,961,461 for diked disposal. -Ilncludes $402,242 for previous projects and $1,523,500 for diked disposal. 'Includes $656,000 for previous projects. "Includes $235,346 for previous projects and $5,119,800 for diked disposal. 31lncludes $491,416 for previous projects. 32Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 3"Includes $354,999 for previous projects. 34"Includes $150,910 for previous projects. "Includes $3,955 for previous projects. "Includes $400,126 for previous projects. "Includes $54,288 for previous projects and $3,081,756 for diked disposal. "Includes $312,423 for previous projects. "Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 4"Includes $312,423 for previous projects. 41Includes $36,194 for previous projects and $593,660 for diked disposal. 42"Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 43Includes $459,305 for previous projects and $6,380,925 for diked disposal. 44Includes $38,606,400 for diked disposal. 45Includes $83,182 contributed funds - diked disposal. 4"Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 47Includes $446,183 for previous projects. 4"Includes $181,500 for diked disposal. 49Includes $284,802 for previous projects. "Includes $113,326 for previous projects and $21,000 for diked disposal. "Includes $9,158 for diked disposal. "Includes $188,495 for previous projects. "Includes $15,123 for previous projects and $10,621 for diked disposal. 54Includes $50,084 for previous projects. "Includes $56,608 for previous projects and $14,907,318 for diked disposal. "Includes $962,556 for previous projects. "7Includes $20,951,888 for diked disposal ($1,671,660 public works fund and $49,419 emergency relief funds) "Includes $420,000 expended for M&O of Dams. s"Includes $503,113 for previous projects. "Includes $638,076 for diked disposal. "'Includes $90,232 for previous projects. "Includes $117,554 for previous projects. "Includes $15,000 for previous projects. "Includes $487,817 for previous projects. "Includes $87,131 for previous projects and $907,792 for diked disposal. "Includes $187,233 for previous projects. 'Includes $131,299 for previous projects and $42,381 for diked disposal. "Includes $323,419 for previous projects. "Includes $219,730 for previous projects and $311,119 for diked disposal. 7"Includes $212,857 for previous projects. "Includes $33,113 for previous projects and $1,187,472 for diked disposal. "-Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 73"Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. 74Includes $13,100 for diked disposal. "Includes $699,947 expended for M&O of Dams. 21-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 ALPENA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Channel depth of 16 2 feet. Rubblemound breakwater for protecting channel on south side and widening entrance channel. 21 and 18 ' foot channel depths and turning basin. Present project dimensions. New turning basin. Removal of old breakwater and construction of new breakwater. Deauthorization of the feature authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 3 ot Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extend of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West, extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 4 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 to 8 feet deep protected by Breakwater. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (See Section 6 of Text) Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from mouth of Cedar River. Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers including a new rubblemound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel from Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River, and a turning basin. H. Doc. 64, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 12, 47th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-74 Annual Report, 1889, p. 2288. H. Doc. 830, 65th Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 1, 67th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 72d Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 151, 88th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1990 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Oct. 28, 1965 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 May 17, 1950 4 Mar. 21, 1956 22 CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 7 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 8 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 9 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum width of 180 feet, with 150- and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of ease and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower (29-foot depth), S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st 0ess. and Annual Report 1876, p. 523. No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 25 of the WRDA of 1988. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2062, and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 219. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st. Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess.; and 322, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 22 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 1908 5 Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 1930 3 Aug. 30, 1930 Jul. 16, 1952 4.6 Jul. 14, 1960 7,22 Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel, 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, inclusive. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 25 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 feet across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 11 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3rd Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.; H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 8,22 FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 12 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. 21-76 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 26, 1934 9 Jul. 3, 1958 o10 Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. Sec. 332 authorized transfer of navigation system to Wisconsin subject to agreement, Federal government to continue water regulation/dam operation. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 13 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 14 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel, and 18 feet deep. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 15 of Text) Two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 16 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island.12 Inner channel.' 3 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Bridge. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 102-580 (WRDA of 1992). H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 1948 June 26, 1964 H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986, Sec. 601c). River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 546, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) Basin 600-foot wide, 850-foot long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder. Breakwater 1,300 feet long. Attached Rubblemound Breakwater and Breakwater extension. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters; 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 20 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.12 Piers and Revetments.12 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Revetted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2176; H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 22 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.12 21-78 Annual Report, 1873, p. 282; H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.; P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 22 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 2 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 22 Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 2,14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 's Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 7, 1974 Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 23 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Acquision of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 Rivers and Harbors Act. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN (See Section 25 of Text) Dredging. Breakwater and modified channels. Construction of measures to correct the design deficiencies which results in unsatisfactory entrance and mooring conditions. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772; H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess.; Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105, 49th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 686, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual report for 1949. H. Doc. 463, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents LA POINTE HARBOR, WI (See Section 26 of Text) Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 27 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 28 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 30 of Text) 12-foot deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension, Reconstruction and repairs to existing structures and present project dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of outer ends of the two inner piers. Deepen Channels and widen opening between breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act; P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. Annual Report, 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 114.16 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 16 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 115. Annual Report, 1891, P. 2678. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-80 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1933 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 17 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 34 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th Street, and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 36 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908; Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report Apr. 1982 Supplement.1 Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess., pts. I and 2; and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 21-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Mar. 2, 1945 '8 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 1835 19 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 1932 21 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 37 of Text) North Pier. 12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater. 12 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo Street, and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Westemrn R.R. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and turning basin.20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 39 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 40 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 113, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report, Dec. 1966.' S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1906, p. 1752 (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions). H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.; 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-82 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 3, 1996 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Aug. 18, 1894 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 1935 27 Jul. 3, 1958 28 Jan. 3, 1996 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 Mar. 3, 1879 ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. Reauthorization of the turning basin feature which was deauthorized (Sec. 1002) in WRDA 86. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 42 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Breakwaters according to larger of two projects. Removal of north breakwater and extension of west breakwater if cost did not exceed $170,000. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 45 of Text) North pier and south basin.12 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. Deauthorization of portion of the navigation project. PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 46 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Entrance channel 18 feet deep protected by piers and revetments. H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Sec. 363 (e) of WRDA 1996 H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1890, p. 2673 Annual Report 1895, p. 2819 Annual Report 1896, p. 2722 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 501(17) of WRDA of 1996. H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 1634 30 21-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B Date of Authorizing Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Aug. 8, 1917 Aug.30, 19352,24,25 Jul. 3, 1958 2 Oct. 23, 1962 2 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 Mar. 21, 1956 22 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 48 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter; 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Avenue (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. Present project channel dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot project above Sixth Street Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 50 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 51 of Text) Interior Revetments. 26 Benton Harbor Canal.26 Present project dimensions of piers and a turning basin. Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess.23 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report, 1880, pp. 2030, 2031, 2049, and 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-84 Documents J . .. . L a DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 58 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Turning basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 52 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 53 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 54 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Avenue. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN (See Section 55 Text) Provides for a Harbor of Refuge for small craft. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 56 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.' 2 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. Turning Basin deauthorized. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 57 of Text) Breakwaters.12 Acquision of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. Public Law 102-580 (Section 116 of WRDA of 1992). H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as 21-85 H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess.; Annual Report, 1896, Vol. 2, Pt. 5, p. 2739. Annual Report, 1907, p. 6416. H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 104 (7), P.L. 102-580 (WRDA 1992) Oct. 31, 1992 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents revetment.'12 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 17, 1967 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 5, 1990 Oct. 30, 1990 Apr. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 17, 1991 Oct. 8, 1992 Jan. 3, 1996 Aug. 18, 1941 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22nd Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 59 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present project depth of Channel. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI (See Section 60 of Text) Breakwaters. Entrance Channel, Anchorage Basin. Breakwater Inside Harbor. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI (See Section 69 of Text) Construction of a cutoff canal with control weirs. Completed project review due to significantly changed physical conditions. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN (See Section 70 of Text) Provides 100-year level of flood protection to part of central area of city of Fort Wayne, IN. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI (See Section 71 of Text) Deepening River Channel, altering Railway Bridge. Riprapping portions of Channel bottom, and utility relocations. Provides that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. SAGINAW RIVER, MI, FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 72 of Text) Flood control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. One-time O&M repairs at Flint Unit to restore project to original dimensions. Provides funding for continuing O&M repairs at Flint Unit. Project is modified to include as part of the project the design and construction of an inflatable dam. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 73 of Text) Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate. 3' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong. 2d Sess. Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 694, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 216 Reconnaissance Report, September 1991. Public Law 101-640 (Section 101 of WRDA of 1990) Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (Sec. 837 ofW.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1992, (P.L. 102-104). Energy and Water Resources Appropriation Act of 1993, H.R. 5373, (P.L. 102-377). H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong. 1st Sess.' 21-86 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 78 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel. 26 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Company provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective LWD's. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, Jun. 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1891, p. 2810. H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 215, 56th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3). H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., and 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). 21-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5Administrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 'Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 10Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 12Completed under previous project. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 14Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 'SLatest published map is in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2974. '6Latest published map in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2914. "7Superseded by Act of October 23, 1962. '8Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street Bridge to North Humboldt Avenue Bridge). 19Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 21War Department Appropriations Act. 22Uncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 23Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 24Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 25This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 27Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 28Deauthorized in 1977. 29This modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 30Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 31Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-88 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Algoma Harbor, WI Completed 1996 292,010 ' 1,618,466 Alternative Technology Project, Duluth Active ---- 0 317,492 AuSable Harbor, MI Completed 1998 209,776 2 2,890,744 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 165,255 Bayport Harbor, MI Completed 1996 93,597 592,369 Bell River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 132,415 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Suamico River, WI Completed 1996 20,243 1,224,007 Black River (lcona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 878 Black River (PH), MI Completed 1998 830,1653 1,490,4914 Black River (UP), MI Completed 1998 383,3505 1,009,407 Bolles Harbor, MI Completed 1996 472,916 3,643,843 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1991 2,832,629 237,351 Cheboygan Harbor, MI Completed 1998 504,236 1,036,196 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 17,829 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 DeTour Harbor, MI Completed 1989 2,559,346 165,554 Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1996 205,164 6 133,684 Grand Marias Harbor, MI Completed 1998 1,055,871 2,640,558 Grand Marais Harbor, MN Completed 1996 450,972 2,386,739 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 826,443 Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1998 1,092,366 1,066,347 Lac LaBelle Harbor, MI Completed 1998 269,270 747,339 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 365,842 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 105,634 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,816,577 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,286 8 118,445 Northport Harbor, WI Inactive ---- 0 0 Oconto Harbor, WI Completed 1998 130,754 9 2,263,89610 Pensaukee Harbor, WI Completed 1996 34,035 679,713 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 97,567 Point Lookout Harbor, MI completed 1998 2,642,584 4,077,592" Port Austin Harbor, MI Completed 1998 3,363,334 2,063,69512 Presque Isle Harbor, MI Completed 1998 1,252,192 1,934,10213 Saxon Harbor, WI Completed 1998 711,77714 971,872 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,17115 573,305 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 2,110,745 96,642 Two Harbors Harbor, MN Completed 1998 4,170,71016 5,250,620 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 106,657 21-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 ' Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 2 Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 3 Includes $85,849 for previous projects. 4 Includes $12,008 for previous projects. 5 Excludes $30,000 Contributed Funds. 6 Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. ' Excludes $38,190 Contributed Funds. 8 Excludes $210,500 Contributed Funds. 9 Includes $84,569 for previous projects. '0lncludes $8,161 for previous projects. "Includes $121,600 for Diked Disposal. 12Includes $159,000 for Diked Disposal. 3Includes $16,500 for Diked Disposal. 14Excludes $50,193 Contributed Funds. 15Excludes $7,500 Contributed Funds. 16Includes $48,404 Nat'l Recovery Act. 21-90 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI' 2 Deferred 1975 4,471,235 Paw Paw Lake, MI Completed 1989 3,589,000 Upper River Rouge, MI' Inactive 1968 7,935 River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 'Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with "Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (PL 99-662). local cooperation. TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 78 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,000' $3,275,000' $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,000 ' $12,718,8064 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. I11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -' $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Steel Stoplogs Recessed Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -' $169,224' Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 600.6 above and 578.4 below. 'Includes cost of North Canal. Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. sExcludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 6Excludes cost of canal excavation to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. "Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separate from cost of locks. 21-91 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project Beaver Bay, MN 1982 Jul 1995 295,818 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Berrien County, MI 1963 Nov 1986 0 0 (St.Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI 1971 Dec 1989 0 0 (Authorized Dec.17, 1979, under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Dec 1989 159,300,000 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, 1990 Dec 1989 14,562,100 0 MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI 1969 Nov 1986 0 0 (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI 1966 Nov 1977 0 0 (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI' 1990 Dec 1989 93,993,349 0 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) Green Bay Harbor, Brown County, WI 1999 April 1999 4,030,000 1,970,000 (1962 Modification) Harbors of Washington Island, WI 1950 Dec 1989 62,838 0 (R&H Act of 1937) Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI 1962 Dec 1989 0 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI 1975 Dec 1989 6,656,668 108,332 (Uncompleted portion) (1954 Flood Control Act) Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI 1975 Dec 1989 416,822 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Kenosha Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 552,000 43,000 (Uncompleted portion) (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) 21-92 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) Lansing (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Lower Fox River, WI 1990 Dec 1989 3,753,334 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) Lutsen Harbor, MN 1990 Jul 1995 357,000 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Manitowoc Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 0 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 6,937,804 478,000 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Act of 1935) Northport Harbor, WI -- Dec 1989 132,000 0 (Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Ontonagon Harbor, MI 1990 Dec 1989 27,482 0 (R&H Act of 1962) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; and Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Acts, and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov 1986 3,823,000 0 (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 22,000 0 (Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Saginaw River, MI 1983 May 1997 5,125,000 1,611,500 (Midland on Tittabawassee River) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) 21-93 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 'Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers. 1906 1977 1990 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Dec 1989 147,463 21-94 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-H FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Length Miles Upbound Project Name of Channel of from or Down- Project Project Datum Year Channel River bound Width Depth Planes Com- (Feet) Mouth Vessels (Feet) (Feet) IGLD 1985 plete (Feet) DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 10 OF TEXT) Channel north of Belle Isle' Channel at head of Detroit River Misc. shoals and obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel north of junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc. shoals and obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Channel (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal - 2 38,800 44,500 30 32 25 24,800 17 12,200 12 Both 200 Both 800 Both --- Both 800 Both 600 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 26,000 10 Down 450 27.7 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 Down Both Both Both Both 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 450-800 800-1,200 1,200 600 600 600 800 300 300 250-300 29.0 29.0 28.5 28.5-29.53 29.5 27.5 21-27.54 21-28.5 s 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 571.9 572.1-571.5 571.5-570.9 570.4 570.4 1964 1964 1964 1962 1964 570.4-569.2 1964 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 570.4-570.1 570.1-569.5 569.5-569.2 569.2 570.3-570.2 570.2-569.4 570.4 1961 1961 1964 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 50 OF TEXT) Channel at foot of Lake Huron Channel north of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island: Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend: CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 38 31 24 11 5 ---. Both 800 Both 800 Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 1,000- 1,400 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 30.0 27.4 27.3 27.3 27.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 577.5-577.1 1961 577.1-576.5 1962 577.1-575.3 575.3-574.3 574.3-572.6 572.6-572.3 572.3-572.2 572.2 572.2 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 'This is a side channel. 2Extends from deep water near Windmill Point to a point opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. 3Project depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 27.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 5Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 28.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 6Project complete except for work authorized by Rivers and Harbors Act of 1950. 21-95 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 12 OF TEXT) Depth at Normal Pool Name of Lock and Dam DePere lock2 DePere dam- Little Kaukauna lock' Little Kaukauna dam 2 Rapide Croche lock2 Rapide Croche dam' Kaukauna fifth lock2 Kaukauna fourth lock2 Kaukauna third lock2 Kaukauna second lock2 Kaukauna first lock' Kaukauna dam2 Kaukauna guard lock Little Chute combined lock: Lower Upper Little Chute second lock2 Luttle Chute first (guard) lock' Little Chute dam2 Cedars lock2 Cedars dam3 Appleton fourth lock2 Appleton lower dam2 Appleton third lock2 Appleton second lock2 Appelton first lock 2 Appleton upper dam Menasha lock2 Menasha dam, Miles from Green Nearest Bay Town 7.1 DePere 7.2 DePere 13.0 DePere 13.1 DePere 19.2 Wrightstow 19.3 Wrightstow 22.8 Kaukauna 23.1 Kaukauna 23.3 Kaukauna 23.4 Kaukauna 23.6 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.4 Little Chute 25.4 Little Chute 26.4 Little Chute 26.5 Little Chute 26.6 Little Chute 27.3 Little Chute 27.4 Little Chute 30.7 Appelton 30.9 Appleton 31.3 Appleton 31.6 Appleton 31.9 Appleton 32.2 Appleton 37.0 Menasha 37.8 Menasha Avail- Dis- Clear able tance Width Length Lift (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) --- 36.0 146.0 8.9 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 6 ---.---.--- 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 2 --- ---- --- 35.6 144.0 9.1 --- 36.6 144.1 10.2 --- 30.6 144.0 10.2 --- 35.0 144.0 9.6 --- 35.1 144.4 11.0 --- 40.0 --- --- 35.4 146.5 10.9 36.3 144.1 10.6 35.0 144.2 13.8 35.4 --- --- 35.0 144.0 9.8 35.0 144.0 7.6 35.0 144.0 8.7 35.1 144.6 9.6 35.0 144.7 10.0 35.4 144.0 8.5 -.-.-.-.-. Breast Wall' (feet) 10.3 8.0 --- _ 8.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.0 6.9 9.4 6.0 7.6 8.0 6.6 6.8 8.1 6.0 6.9 6.6 7.2 --- _ Lower Miter Sill Character of (feet) Foundation 12.0 Rock --- Rock 9.5 Clay --- Clay & Gravel 9.3 Rock --- Rock 9.3 Rock 6.0 Rock 6.3 Rock 6.0 Rock 6.0 Rock --- Rock --- Rock 8.6 Rock 6.0 Hardpan 6.1 Rock --- Rock --- Rock 7.3 Rock --- Rock 7.9 Rock --- Rock 8.6 Rock 6.0 Clay 6.0 Rock --- Rock 8.0 Clay --- Hardpan Year Kind of Type of Conm- Dam Construction plete --- Concrete 1936 Fixed3"4 Concrete 1929 --- Concrete 1938 Fixed3'4 Piers and concrete 1926 --- Concrete 1934 Fixed'"4 Concrete 1930 --- Composite 1898 --- Stonemasonry 1879 --- Stone masonry 1879 --- Stone masonry 1903 --- Stonemasonry 1883 Fixed 3'4 Concrete 1931 --- Stone masonry 1891 --- Stone masonry --- Stone masonry --- Stone masonry --- Stone masonry Fixed '" 4 Concrete -- Stone masonry Fixed 3"4 Concrete --- Stone masonry Fixed"' Concrete --- Stone masonry --- Stone masonry --- Stone masonry Fixed' Concrete --- Composite Fixed' Concrete 1879 1879 1881 1904 1932 1888 1933 1907 1934 1900 1901 1884 1940 1899 1937 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 'Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 'Provided with sluices. 4Flash boards used. 5Partially rebuilt. TABLE 21-I Actual Cost $229,308 209,536 362,427 179,398 228,738 118,975 13,310 37,536 39,948 24,313 38,704 123,763 12,630 102,304 48,555 7,817' 82,554 34,972 84,973 40,893 73,903 32,238 22,940 36,004 151,558 19,3265 84.686 21-96 Depth at Normal Pool 1 1 1 1 1 1 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted BAYFIELD HARBOR, WI BAYPORT HARBOR, MI BELLE RIVER, MI BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI BLACK RIVER (PH), MI DETOUR HARBOR, MI EAGLE HARBOR, MI HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI LAC LABELLE HARBOR, MI MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI OCONTO HARBOR, WI PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI PINE RIVER, MI POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI SAXON HARBOR, WI TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI MAY 1999 MAY 1999 NOVEMBER 1998 AUGUST 1999 JUNE 1999 MAY 1999 JUNE 1999 JUNE 1999 JUNE 1999 MAY 1999 AUGUST 1999 AUGUST 1999 NOVEMBER 1998 MAY 1999 AUGUST 1999 JULY 1999 AUGUST 1999 21-97 TABLE 21-J Name of Project _~ CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT The district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, DuPage, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, and a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan in Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Burns Waterway Harbor (Major Rehab), IN 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL 6. Chicago River, IL 7. Indiana Harbor, IN 8. Indiana Harbor CDF 9. Lake Michigan Diversion 10. Michigan City Harbor, IN 11. Waukegan Harbor, IL 12. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 13. National Emergency Preparedness Alterations of Bridges 14. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Beach Erosion Control 15. Casino Beach, IL 16. Chicago Shoreline, IL 17. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 18. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN 19. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 20. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 21. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization Flood Control 22. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 23. Des Plaines River 24. Lake George, Hobart, IN 25. Little Calumet River, IN 26. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 27. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 28. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 29. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 30. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 31. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Page 22-3 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-4 22-5 22-6 22-6 22-7 22-7 22-8 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-10 22-10 22-10 22-11 22-11 22-11 22-11 22-12 22-12 22-13 22-13 22-14 22-14 22-15 22-15 General Investigations 32. Surveys 33. Collection and Study of Basic Data 22-1 Page 22-15 22-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLES Table Title Number Cost and Financial Statement Authorization Legislation Existing Projects Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Deauthorized Projects 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-D 22-E 22-F 22-G Pages 22-17 thru-20 22-21 thru 25 22-26 thru 27 22-28 22-28 22-28 22-29 22-2 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound north breakwater 4,630 feet long and a rubblemound breakwater west arm 1,200 feet long, for a total breakwater length of 5,830 feet; (b) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (d) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; and (e) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army with the authority to reimburse the State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Eleven berths are available at the facilities owned and administered by the Indiana Port Commission. One berth, committed to grain, is located on the outer harbor. Four berths on the East Harbor Arm are dedicated to handling dry and liquid bulk commodities. The East Harbor Arm also includes a small-boat harbor designed to accommodate working tugs for vessel assistance and barge movement. On the West Arm there are six berths. Although one berth is available for dry bulk cargoes, these berths are primarily used for the shipment and receipt of general cargo. Additionally, the Indiana Port Commission, through a lease, administers the west side of the West Harbor Arm for barge fleeting. The remaining available harbor berthing on the east side of the East Harbor Arm is privately owned. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were performed at a cost of $7,366. Breakwater maintenance costs were $22,081 for hired labor, $597,640 by other Corps of Engineers, and $474,231 by contract. Engineering and design costs were $4,528. Project administration and real estate costs were $72,865 and $5,129, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1999 were $26,239,180 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 nonfederal) and $12,639,280 ($12,530,918 federal and $108,362 non-federal) for was maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Waterway, approximately 27 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound west breakwater 1,043 feet long; (b) a rubblemound north breakwater 678 feet long; and (c) channel improvements of 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic yards of dredged material used for beach nourishment (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas located along Burns Waterway and Burns Ditch. The principal marina, which is owned and operated jointly by the City of Portage and the Little Calumet River Basin Commission, was built in 1996 to comply with the local cooperation agreement. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish caught as a result of charter boat fishing. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys were conducted at a cost of $2,863. Engineering and design for dredging was performed at a cost of $35,690. Project management costs were $54,616. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1999 were $5,140,662 of which $3,770,558 was for new work ($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and $1,370,104 for maintenance (federal). 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 3. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR (MAJOR REHAB), IN Location. The project is located in northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County. Existing Project. The rehabilitation project consists of constructing a segmented reef breakwater system, 75 feet lakeward of the northern section of the existing rubblemound breakwater. The project provides for seven reef segments, one 1,575 feet long and six 375 feet long with 25 feet spacing between segments Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Following construction completion in 1998, project closeout was completed in 1999. The construction management costs were $7,425. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. The construction contract was financially completed. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 was $13,384,161. 4. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, and approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stonefilled double-row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (d) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (e) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (f) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (g) three turning basins designated as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; and (h) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 27, 1965 (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Illinois International Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are general cargo, grain, iron ore and concentrates, coal, and cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $24,854. CDF maintenance costs were $31,154 for hired labor, $35,170 by AE contract, $6,084 for supervision and administration and $185,600 for engineering and design. Costs for routine operation and monitoring of the CDF were $95,655 for hired labor and $5,380 by other federal agency. Costs for breakwater maintenance were $16,684 for hired labor, $253,800 by contract, and $158,669 by other Corps. Dredging costs were $143,061 for E&D, $175,803 by AE contract and $109,263 by hired labor. Environmental compliance inspections were conducted at a cost of $25,745 by AE contract. Facilities maintenance costs were $23,376. Project management and real estate costs were $93,880 and $1,964, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100 percent complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1999, were $63,746,086 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 federal funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $35,739,518 for maintenance ($34,902,851 federal and $836,667 non-federal funds) and $5,428,001 federal funds for rehabilitation. 5. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib shore and extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone-filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and 22-4 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of a 582-foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304-foot shore return and a 754-foot gap; (f) a stone-filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and southerly extension breakwater 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an entrance channel 21 feet deep and (j) the Chicago Harbor Lock. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deepdraft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep over the sill and is of steel cellular design. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 23, 1962 (See table 22-B). Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interest of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 98-63 approved July 30, 1983; Section 107 of the Public 97-88; and the Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are five docks with 18 berths for passenger excursion boats and 10 berths for visiting large vessels. The most important cargoes handled through the lock are petroleum products, in addition to sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Formal periodic inspections of the lock were conducted at a cost of $9,848 for hired labor and $19,719 by other Corps. Project condition surveys were performed by hired labor for $45,029 and by other Corps for $75,000. The lock was operated by contract at a cost of $813,330. Other costs associated with the lock operation were $178,624. Operation of the lock property $111,843 by hired labor and other in-house resources. Lock maintenance costs to include gate parts fabrication, track milling, hinge and seal replacement and lifting beam replacement were $205,587 for hired labor and in-house resources, $512,127 by contract, $291,229 by other government agencies and $807,289 by other Corps of Engineers. Engineering and design costs for the above were $55,899 by hired labor; supervision and administration costs were $53,705. Breakwater maintenance costs were $7,619 for hired labor, $340,930 by other Corps of Engineers and $314,000 by contract. Work on the lock major rehabilitation report was performed at $270,570 by hired labor, $14,970 by AE contract and $220,051 by other Corps of Engineers. Project management and real estate costs were $99,454 and $3,406, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1999 were $50,777,558 of which $4,788,827 was for new work, $44,502,131 was for maintenance, $1,326,600 for rehabilitation and $160,000 Harbor and Dams funds. 6. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21-foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street (authorized but not constructed). The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and July 24, 1946 (See tables 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1946 is presently being restudied to confirm economic feasibility. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, which provided for the improvement of the channel, is subject to the condition that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of the improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock, non-metallic minerals and scrap iron. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Water control activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $93,841, by other Corps of Engineers at a cost $10,000 and by other federal agency at a cost of $146,818. Program management cost was $34,769. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by the 1946 River Harbor Act. Channel maintenance for the reach from Clark Street to head of navigation has been deferred pending location and approval of suitable dredged material disposal site. Head of navigation for deep-draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles from the Michigan Avenue bridge. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1999 were $17,574,823 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $16,074,258 was for maintenance. 7. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a main canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; and (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 28, 1937, and July 14, 1960 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. Six docks are for handling petroleum products and three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. However, not all docks are presently being used for the shipment or receipt of waterborne commodities. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Environmental studies costs were $145,943 for hired labor and other in-house resources. Engineering and design costs of Confined Disposal Facility were $76,501 for hired labor, $11,140 by other Corps of Engineers and $106,458 by contract. Breakwater maintenance costs were $49,000 by contract. Program management and real estate costs were $77,394 and $14,082, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1999 were $18,946,407 of which $4,909,648 ($4,897,148 federal and $12,500 nonfederal contributed funds) was for new work and $14,036,759 was for maintenance. Channel maintenance has been deferred pending location and construction of suitable Confined Disposal Facility. 8. INDIANA AND CANAL CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY (CDF), IN Location: The navigation project is located on the southwestern shore of Lake Michigan within the City of East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana, 4-1/2 miles east of the Indiana-Illinois state line and 17 miles from downtown Chicago, Illinois. A CDF will be constructed at the Energy Cooperative Industries (ECI) site in East Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. IHC is an authorized Federal navigation project with an entrance channel and outer harbor protected by breakwaters, and an inner harbor which includes the Indiana Harbor Canal and its two branches, the Lake George Branch, which extends west for a distance of 6,800 feet, and the Calumet River Branch which extends south for about 2 miles where it joins the Grand Calumet River. The harbor has not been dredged since 1972, when the United States Environmental Protection Agency determined that disposal in Lake Michigan was no longer acceptable due to the polluted character of the harbor sediments. A 4.8 million cubic yards capacity CDF will be constructed on the 164 acres of land adjacent to the Lake George Branch of the IHC, formerly occupied 22-6 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT by an oil refinery owned by the Atlantic Richfield Company and subsequently acquired by ECI. The ECI property currently has open Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) status due to the contaminated soil and grounwater that exists on the site. Use of this site for the CDF is contingent upon the construction of specific RCRA closure and corrective action features which will be integral aspects of the CDF construction. The elements of the CDF include construction of an impervious cutoff wall built around the 11,000 linear feet perimeter of the site to approximately 30-35 feet depths, tied into the clay layer below; groundwater monitoring and extraction wells and pumps to maintain an inward gradient and prevent any contaminated groundwater from leaving the site; an air monitoring system; an on-site water treatment facility to treat groundwater pumpage, water from dried dredged materials and precipitation falling on the site; dikes built in two 15 feet stages, with an impervious clay layer on the interior of the dikes; a rehandling area; and a cap constructed using 3 feet of clay, 6 inches of sand, 2 feet of clean fill and 6 inches top soil with grass cover. This cap configuration, used for both the CDF and the buffer areas, will satisfy the RCRA closure requirement for the ECI site. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the East Chicago Waterway Management District (ECWMD). The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the ECWMD is required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share to twenty-five percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facilities during construction and pay 50 percent of the costs of incremental maintenance. The local sponsor is also required to reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs of general navigation facilities allocated to commercial navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction, as partially reduced by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights of way, relocations, and dredged or excavated material disposal provided for commercial navigation. In addition, the ECWMD is required to pay 100 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facilities during construction for the local service facilities (non-federal berthing areas) and 100 percent of costs of incremental maintenance for the local service facilities. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Total engineering and design costs were $430,579, including $284,302 for hired labor, $2,480 by AE contract, and $143,797 performed by other Corps of Engineers. Work on the Project Cooperation Agreement activities was completed by hired labor for $67,315. The project management costs were $69,935. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. Work on the Design Document Report and the plans and specifications for the first construction contract was initiated. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 was $567,829. 9. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1988. Operations and Results During Period. Operations: Water accounting studies and preparation of reports were performed at costs of $458,117 by hired labor, $400,025 by other federal agency, and $218,194 by AE contract. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 was $4,860,877. AUTHORIZATION: The original authorizing document was H. Doc. 1113, 60 th Cong., 2d Sess., taken from the River and Harbor Act of 1910. Project features include breakwaters at the harbor entrance and a deep-draft navigation channel. H. Doc, 195, 8 6 th Cong., 1st Sess., River and Harbor Act of 1960 increased the authorized project depths. 10. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1992. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 stone-filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone-filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin No. 1, 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) an outer basin 12 feet deep in the northerly portion and 8 feet deep in the southerly portion; and (i) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from turning basin No. 2 to the E Street bridge. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, March 3, 1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and Section 107 of July 14, 1960, River and Harbor Acts, September 30, 1966 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were continued by hired labor at a cost of $3,940. Environmental studies for dredging preparation were performed at a cost of $102,014. Confined Disposal Facility maintenance costs were $9,342. Program management and real estate costs were $40,171 and $1,896, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30 1998 were $15,297,703, of which $1,574,158 was for new work ($1,543,646 federal and $30,512 non-federal funds), $12,104,875 for maintenance ($12,049,875 federal and $55,000 non-federal) and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation (federal funds). 11. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14904 and 14905.) Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stone-filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone-filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled doublerow steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single-row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone-filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 18 feet deep; and (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. An authorized, but as yet unconstructed project modification provides for (a) an entrance channel 27 feet deep, (b) a channel between the piers 23 feet deep and (c) an inner basin and channel extension 23 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 3, 1902, July 13, 1930, and March 2, 1945, and on December 17,1970 by delegated authority under Section 201 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965. (See tables 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the 1970 modification is being restudied to confirm economic feasiblity. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions. The Dec. 17, 1970 modification, which provides for modifications to the channel, is subject to the conditions that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages from construction and maintenance of the improvement and that certain lands, easements and rights-of-way be provided. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys were performed at cost of $9,885. Plans and specifications for dredging the outer harbor were performed by hired labor at a cost of $80,300. Dredging was performed at a contract cost of $806,072, supervision and administration costs were $32,901 and other dredging costs were $29,426. Breakwater maintenance costs were $90,155 for hired labor and other in-house resources, $160,000 by other Corps and $36,632 by contract. Environmental studies for CDF costs were $120,144 by AE contract and $126,382 by hired labor. Project management and real estate costs were $70,256 and $877, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification, which is being restudied. Maintenance of the channel between the pier to the head of navigation has been deferred pending location, approval and probable construction of a suitable dredged material disposal 22-8 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT site. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1999 were $16,917,357 of which $823,026 was for new work and $16,094,331 was for maintenance. 12. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $144,242. 13. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year 1999 costs for management and mobilization planning were $59,261. Alteration of Bridges 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS See table 22-D. Beach Erosion Control 15. CASINO BEACH, IL Location. Casino Beach is located along the Lake Michigan shoreline at Jackson Park in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Casino Beach project was authorized by Section 501 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of rehabilitating 1,800 feet of the Casino jetty by encasing the existing timber pile and stone structure in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Chicago Park District. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During Period. No new work. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 was $2,465,517 federal and $2,166,056 non-federal. 16. CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL Location. The project area includes 9.2 miles of revetment reconstruction within 24 miles of publicly owned shoreline along Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Chicago Shoreline project is not authorized. The Federally supportable plan consists of constructing rubblemound revetments along 16,750 and 25,400 feet of the shoreline in the Lincoln Park and Burnham Park areas, respectively. Other project features include: revetments near the Adler Planetarium and at Meigs Field; a breakwater to protect the South Filtration Plant near 78th Street; and nourishment of a short reach of shoreline near Fullerton Avenue and 31st Street. The estimated fully funded project cost for this plan (1999) is $293,240,000. The local sponsor prefers to substitute steel sheet pile step stone revetments for the rubblemound revetments in the Lincoln and Burnham Park areas. They have agreed to pay the increased cost above the federally supportable plan. Local Cooperation. This project has three separate Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA's). The first PCA, for the Reach 5 breakwater reconstruction, was executed on 28 April 1997. The second PCA, for Section 215 work, was executed on 7 August 1998, and covers construction of three portions of the project: 1,000 feet of revetment at Belmont Harbor in Reach 2, an 800 foot stretch of shoreline at 31st Street beach in Reach 4 (both of these are being constructed by the non-federal sponsor), and revetment reconstruction from 31st to 3 3rd streets in Reach 4 (Corps work). The project Cooperation Agreement for the balance of the project work was executed on 17 May 1999, implementing section 206 of WRDA 92 which allows the nonfederal sponsor to perform a significant portion of the work. Design and construction of the project is well underway. Project construction is estimated to be completed in the year 2005. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During Period. The nonfederal sponsors completed construction of the Reach 5 breakwater, and continued construction of the Belmont Peninsula revetment in Reach 2, and the 31st 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Street Beach Stabilization work in Reach 4. The Corps continued with revetment construction of 31st to 3 3rd Street in Reach 4, and initiated revetment construction of Irving to Belmont in Reach 2, and I- 55 to 30 th Street and 33 rd to 37t Street in Reach 4. A total of $7,329,606 was spent for construction; $473,637 was expended for construction management. Engineering and design costs of $3,303,110 were expended on Reaches 2 and 4, including $244,596 for A-E contracts. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction in Reach 5 and Reach 3, Solidarity Drive, was completed by the local sponsor. Condition was underway in Reaches 2 and 4 by the Corps and the local sponsor. Engineering and design was continued in Reaches 2 and 4. The total federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999, was $24,189,929. 17. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan along the 9-mile reach of shoreline immediately south of the Illinois-Wisconsin State line. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14901 and 14904.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) construction of 46 rubblemound, offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long and spaced about 300 feet apart; (b) initial beach nourishment consisting of placement of 100,000 cubic yards of coarse graded beach material; and (c) periodic renourishment of 100,000 cubic yards approximately every five years. The project was conditionally authorized in Section 501 (b) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act subject to a report by the Corps of Engineers and approval by the Secretary of the Army. A Feasibility Review Conference was held in April 1991. As a result, the District Engineer was directed to terminate work on this project and to submit a letter report to the Congress summarizing the feasibility study and the results of the Washington level review. Work on the feasibility report was resumed in FY 1994 as directed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works in response to a letter from Congressman John Porter, 10th Congressional District of Illinois. The locally preferred plan for this project involves annual beach nourishment and construction of a sand trap at the south end of the park. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor would be required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; accomplish all required relocations; hold and save the United State free from damages; and provide a cash contribution. Operations and Results During Period. No work effort was accomplished on this project due to lack of funding. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 was $11,908. 18. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, about 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for placement of 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of riprap to maintain the full length of Lake Front Drive in Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Laws 97-88 and 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Project lands are held by the National Park Service. Operations and Results During Period. Revetment maintenance was performed at a cost of $1,060,080 by contract and $83,362 hired labor. Engineering and design costs were $6,770; supervision and administration costs were $17,921. A condition survey was performed by AE contract at a cost of $45,987. Project management and real estate costs were $44,230 and $613 respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1999 were $2,950,198 of which $660,000 was for new work and $2,290,198 was for maintenance. 19. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment along approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, 22-10 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1997) for new work is $184,000,000, including future beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: The final phase of initial placement was completed in FY99, where 157,000 CY of sand were placed at a cost of $1,690,237. Construction management costs were $137,579. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction was initiated. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 is $7,635,140. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-E. 21. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962, as amended. None. Flood Control 22. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 1974 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act changed the cost sharing to require that non-federal interests pay 50 percent of the cost of maintenance plus the cost of disposal. The requirements are fully complied with. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Project management costs were $453. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1999 was $4,445,097 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 federal funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $4,213,213 was for maintenance ($2,611,782 federal funds and $1,601,431 nonfederal contributed funds). 23. DES PLAINES RIVER, ILLINOIS Location. The Upper Des Plaines River is located in the northeastern Illinois counties of Lake and Cook. Its 67 miles flow through 33 communities, most of which are part of the Chicago metropolitan area. Existing Project. The Des Plaines flood control project was authorized by Section 101(b) (10) of the 1999 Water Resources Development Act. The optimized project provides a maximum 0.12 foot reduction in stage for the 100-year flood, and the levee features meet the FEMA criteria for 100-year protection. The project consists of six features to construct (three in Lake County and three in Cook County), environmental mitigation, and a flood warning plan. The project adds 1,975 acre-feet of storage by constructing 4 features: a lateral storage area in Van Patton Woods (412 acre-feet); enlarging the existing North Fork Mill Creek Dam by elevating the crest of spillway (500 acre-feet); and excavating the existing reservoirs at Buffalo Creek (476 acrefeet) and at Big Bend Lake (587 acre-feet). The remaining 2 project features are levees with appurtenant interior drainage features. Levee 37 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 raises portions of Des Plaines River Road and Milwaukee Avenue between Palatine Road and Euclid Avenue from 0.5 to 5 feet over a total length of 8,500 feet. Levee 50 is a combination levee/flood wall in the City of Des Plaines between Dempster Road and the Chicago and Northwestern railroad. The length of this levee would be about 2,600 feet and the length of the floodwall would be 2,115 feet. Local Cooperation. The nonfederal sponsor is the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). IDNR is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; complete all required utility relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design began when the Division Engineer's Notice was signed in June, 1999, and $46,819 in PED costs have been incurred. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 was $46,819. 24. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 602(b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana indicated that it was a potential local project sponsor and applied for credit for previous work applicable to the project under the provisions of Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. By letter dated March 19, 1999, the City of Hobart, Indiana withdrew it's interest in the project. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued by hired labor at a cost of $62,412. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design was terminated. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 is $1,311,976. 25. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. The Little Calumet River project is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois- Indiana State line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and appurtenant structures between the Illinois-Indiana State line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge culvert modifications; modifying one highway bridge; construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities; and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated federal cost (1998) for new work is $179,000,000; $131,000,000 federal and $48,000,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The construction contract for Stages II-3A, III and V-1 levee segment and the Stage 1-4 demolition contract were completed in FY 1995. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The local cooperation agreement was signed on August 16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution for structural flood control measures, fifty percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent for fish and wildlife enhancements. A memorandum of agreement with the local sponsor to design non-federal improvements was signed on May 20, 1992. Operations and Results During Period. 22-12 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Continuing construction of Stages II-4 Broadway to King, IV-2A Burr to Clark Streets, IV-2B between Clark and Chase, II-3c(2) between Grant and Harrison, and Rec. I Design Memorandum completed for West Reach (Cline Ave. to the IL/IN state line) in February 1994. Complete FDM work on Burr Street betterment levee and continued design for pump station contract No. 1. Real estate management costs were $198,407 (federal). Engineering and design costs were $1,837,972 ($1,681,453 federal and $156,519 nonfederal) which included $1,403,873 for hired labor $1,295,170 federal and $108,703 non-federal); $290,023 performed by other Corps of Engineers (federal); and $144,077 by A-E contract ($124,395 federal and $19,682 non-federal). Construction contract costs were $1,124,362 ($858,935 federal and $280,977 non-federal). Construction management costs were $573,558 ($525,916 federal and $47,641 non-federal). Operation and maintenance costs during construction were $4,620 federal. Total federal and non-federal costs were $3,269,332 and $485,136 respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is in progress. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1999 was $66,629,441. Federal costs total $60,537,252; required non-federal costs total $5,044,429; and non-federal improvements costs total $1,047,759. 26. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN Location. Cady Marsh is located in Lake County, Indiana. The Ditch is a tributary of the Little Calumet River system in northwest Indiana and flows through the Towns of Griffith and Highland, Indiana. Existing Project. The Cady Marsh Ditch flood control project was authorized by Section 401 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project provides for diverting flood flows from Cady Marsh Ditch to the Little Calumet River through a diversion system under Arbogast Avenue in Griffith. Specifically, the project consists of improving 1,290 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch between Colfax and Arbogast Avenues in Griffith, constructing approximately 5,000 feet of large conduct pipes under Arbogast Avenue, excavating an open channel approximately 2,850 feet long from the north end of Arbogast Avenue to the Little Calumet River, and constructing interior drainage improvements. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Town of Griffith, IN. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; complete all required utility relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $106,550. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1999 was $1,208,709. 27. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located near the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, Illinois at the existing Metropolitan Water Reclamation Solids Management Area. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook Reservoir will have a storage volume of 21,400 acre-feet (7 billion gallons); the Thornton Reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1999) is $621,000,000, including a federal cost for new work of $504,000,000, and $167,000,000 to be contributed by non-federal interests. The project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago will be the local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood 22-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Engineering and design was continued at a cost of $3,762,786, with $2,156,338 in hired labor; $1,023,071 for A-E contracts; $276,845 performed by other Corps of Engineers; $236,304 performed by other Federal Agencies; Real estate costs were $70,228. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Engineering and design was continued. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1999 were $24,600,401. 28. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. Section 401 of the 1986 Act also included authorization to reimburse non-federal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny Reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork Reservoir on the Middle Fork. In July 1990, the federal government reimbursed the non-federal interests $4,467,298 for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. The total federal cost was $4,537,435 for these reservoirs. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, is located on the West Fork, 12.7 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It has a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. The reservoir construction was completed in June 1990. Reservoir 29A is located 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. Two project features, channel relocation and construction of two bridges, are a nonfederal responsibility. Reservoir 29A was substantially completed in September 1994. Reservoir 15 is located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The reservoir is approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which is about 15 feet deeper. Construction of Reservoir 15 was completed in May 1992. The local sponsor has contributed $550,100 for the non-federal improvements for Reservoir 29A. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Completed erosion repair at Reservoir Nos. 15 and 29A and trash rack installation at Reservoir 29A. The total FY 1999 cost was $274,064 federal ($0 non-federal), which included construction contract, construction management and engineering and design. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100 percent complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1999 were $23,227,231, of which $20,929,979 was federal and $2,297,252 was non-federal, excluding the $4,493,298 non-federal cost for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. A total $549,022 in non-federal funds has been expended on bridge and channel betterments at Reservoir 29A. A total of $6,320,134 in non-federal funds has been expended on investigations in connection with the clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A. Non-federal betterment funds in the amount of $38,500 were expended for work on an impact assessment. A total of $11,166 was spent at Reservoir 27 for the Illinois Tollway project. 29. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir is located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in Northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir has been constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources 22-14 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Development Act of 1986. Program Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the first construction contract, creek relocation, was signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total project costs. The local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project, reservoir excavation and lining, was signed July 29, 1991. Operations and Results During Period. The reservoir construction was physically completed in July 1998. Construction was continued at a cost of $999,912 ($879,353 federal and $120,559 nonfederal). Real estate management costs were $1,100 (federal). Engineering and design costs were $28,252 (federal), all hired labor. Construction management costs were $62,186 (federal). Total federal and nonfederal costs were $970,892 and $115,260, respectively. Non-federal improvement costs were $6777,663. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning and engineering is completed. Construction is substantially completed. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1999 were $38,348,256 for new work. Federal costs total $31,283,139; non-federal costs total $4,460,161; non-federal improvement costs total $2,604,957. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 31. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities, repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional antecedent legislation). to September 30, 1999 Disaster Preparedness Disaster Assistance (FEMA) $ 154,233 941,922 Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress: A total of $17,780 was spent on the Section 14 coordination account. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1965, as amended: Fiscal year 1999 costs were $338,452 federal and $270,347 non-federal for flood control activities. A total of $13,976 was spent on the Section 205 coordination account. Squaw Creek, Lake County, IL feasibility phase was initiated at a cost of $25,286 federal. Valley View, IL final feasibility report at the cost of $1,604 non-federal. Fox River, McHenry Co., IL Plan and Spec. phase was initiated at the cost of $40,275 federal. Libertyville Estate, IL construction phase was continued at the cost of $-78,138 federal and $53,320 nonfederal. McCook Levee, IL feasibility phase was continued at the cost of $3,186 federal. Tinley Creek, IL feasibility phase was initiated at the cost of $1,179 federal. Kankakee River and Newton Co., (Sumava) feasibility phase was continued at the cost of $50,730 federal and $48,666 non-federal. City of Oak Forest, Natalie Creek feasibility stage was continued at the cost of $87,361 federal. Stony Creek, IL feasibility stage was continued at the cost of $65,024 federal and $51,311 non-federal. Hickory Creek, Tinley Park feasibility stage was continue at the cost of $96,912 federal. General Investigations 32. SURVEYS Fiscal Year 1999 costs were $1,522,654 federal and $352,210 non-federal. Itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Special Studies Review Authorize Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies $ 786,574 72,253 103,287 78,778 103,106 378,656 $ 6,161 0 0 0 0 210,324 Fiscal Year Costs 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal Year 1999 costs were $67,465 federal and $0 non-federal itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Plain Management $ 62,465 $ 0 Services Hydrologic Studies 5,000 0 22-16 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Burns Waterway Harbor (Major Rehab), IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 0 13,584,000 13.584.000 766,000 1,020,000 385,000 1,157,000 12,532,104 890,810 1,009,088 403,364 1,183,840 12,530,918 0 0 125,900 (17,538) 108,362 0 0 0 141,000 137,500 15,900 15,900 108,362 108,362 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 5,000 2,134 0 0 0 95,000 1,371,935 7,176 93,169 1,370,104 0 0 3,518,000 3,675,000 3,557,000 3,934,348 3,500,638 3,948,927 0 0 0 0 (112,800) 7,425 0 0 0 0 1,770,558 1,770,558 13,384,200 13,384,161 22,578,567 1/ 22,578,567 1/ 565,000 672,000 912,000 1,333,100 34,907,899 2/ 571,699 674,340 867,649 1,386,142 34,902,851 2/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,505,000 5,409,000 4,562,000 4,176,000 5,405,143 5,376,330 4,512,080 4,450,229 5,428,001 3/ 5,428,001 3/ 836,667 836,667 4,788,827 4/ 4,788,827 4/ 44,513,546 44,502,131 22-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project (Harbor and Dam Funds) 6. Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Indiana Harbor, Confined Disposal Facility, IN (Federal Funds) 9. Lake Michigan Diversion, IL (Federal Funds) 10. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Waukegan Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) Funding Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 0 0 160,000 152,464 0 0 0 0 0 7,536 0 0 1,326,600 1,326,600 160,000 160,000 1,500,565 5/ 1.500.565 5/ 395,000 284,000 306,000 271,000 16,079,394 6/ 370,087 302,328 298,532 285,428 16,074,258 6/ 4,897,148 7/ 4,897,148 7/ 525,000 642,000 770,000 526,000 14,201,988 8/ 486,192 610,516 762,311 480,518 14,036,759 8/ 0 0 0 0 600,000 567,829 397,000 488,000 782,000 990,000 406,306 500,397 700,799 1,076,336 12,500 12,500 600,000 567,829 4,861,000 4,860,877 1,543,646 9/ 1,543,646 9/ 617,000 61,000 126,000 155,000 12,057,054 613,881 45,948 136,729 157,363 12,049,875 0 0 0 0 0 0 670,000 743,000 831,000 1,333,000 644,950 674,928 707,773 1,536,030 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,512 30,512 55,000 55,000 823,026 10/ 823,026 10/ 16,121,768 11/ 16,094,331 11/ 22-18 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 15. Casino Beach. IL New Work: (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Chicago Shoreline, IL (Federal Funds) 17. Illinois Beach State Park, IL (Federal Funds) 18. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Beverly Shores, IN (Federal Funds) 19. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (Federal Funds) 22. Chicago River North Branch, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. DesPlaines River, IL (Federal Funds) 24. Lake George, Hobart, IN (Federal Funds) 25. Little Calumet River, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 0 152,000 (12,000) (140,000) 204,972 579,125 (144,728) 0 80,000 350,000 139,484 676,773 0 (233,914) 209,080 69 300,000 8,000,000 7,392,000 14,382,800 339,837 3,600,693 7,285,287 11,350,949 (9,000) 0 0 0 35,000 37,447 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 0 435,235 1,500,000 2,200,000 3,000,000 358,037 1,846,052 3,179,721 0 0 0 10,964 0 0 0 72,396 0 0 0 242,835 3,848,000 7,509,912 5,000 3,550 0 0 0 4,315 0 0 0 0 0 4,060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,258,963 700,000 1,827,816 0 0 2,525,000 2,465,517 2,166,086 2,166,056 31,727,800 24,189,929 13,200 11,908 660,000 660,000 2,296,000 2,290,198 7,831,800 12/ 7,635,140 12/ 191,884 191,884 0 2,612,350 453 2,611,782 0 0 0 0 140,000 (91,032) 0 46,819 100,000 3,500,000 98,460 254,703 40,000 40,000 1,737,441 1,601,431 48,968 46,819 0 4,804,000 62,412 1,311,977 9,639,000 8,378,000 5,657,000 9,656,693 8,336,116 3,269,332 685,000 800,000 962,600 605,611 799,848 1,028,481 328,000 57,500 402,000 401,424 54,224 424,831 63,174,300 13/ 60,537,253 13/ 700,000 5,505,600 464,413 5,044,429 39,000 1,066,500 20,723 1,047,759 22-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sept. 30, 1999 26. Little Calumet River, New Work: Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (Federal Funds) 27. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL (Federal Funds) 28. North Branch Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) (Non-Federal Lead Shot Clean-up) (Non-Federal Impact Assessment) (Non-Federal Res. 27 IL Tollway) 29. O'HIare Reservoir, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 0 468,230 0 2,086,810 200,000 122,000 17,815 64,346 0 1,342,000 106,550 1,208,709 0 0 2,908,000 2,018,847 3,084,398 3,762,786 25,282,000 24,600,401 0 300,000 518,000 135,000 21,205,500 14/ 8,974 108,255 346,271 274,064 20,929,979 14/ 0 (4) 0 0 0 330,653 0 28 0 0 0 8,119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48,090 38,500 0 9,934 28,566 0 0 3,503,000 5,171,047 20,000 9,718 00 0 (8,834) 1,448 0 4,615,000 3,447,000 4,073,508 3,987,380 0 870,000 158,972 553,708 0 354,577 600,000 580,000 750,000 14,872 512,189 1,400,233 2,297,254 2,297,252 550,100 549,022 6,335,170 6,320,134 38,500 38,500 11,166 11,166 930,000 31,377,000 970,892 31,283,139 0 5,061,200 115,260 4,460,162 280,000 2,810,000 677,663 2,604,957 1 Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2 Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3 Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue dust. 4 Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5 Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7 Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8 Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9 Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 10 Includes $218,233 for previous projects. 11 Includes $15,711 for previous projects. 12 Includes $107,000 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sep 1985. 13 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sep 1985. 14 Includes $489,310 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sep 1985. 22-20 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 14, 1960 Sec. 107 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 193512 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 19453 Jul. 14, 196013 Oct. 23, 196213 Oct 27, 196513 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 and 3 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and Public Law, 89-298, depths, a north breakwater, west bulkhead, approach channel and H. Doc. 160. 88th Cong., outer harbor, east and west harbor arms. 1st Sess. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for a 700-foot north breakwater, a 950-foot west breakwater Detailed Project Report an entrance channel 11-feet deep, a harbor-of-refuge area 10 feet detailed February 1983. deep and a channel in Burns Waterway 6 feet deep. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 4 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc. 277, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Five turning basins. H. Doc. 172, 5 4 th Cong., 2nd Sess. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. H. Doc. 346, 6 0 th Cong., 1st Sess. Consolidated the two projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth H. Doc. 494, 72nd Cong., and dimensions; deepen river entrance channel and river to existing 2 nd Sess. project depths; widen and straighten river channel; five turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance H. Doc. 180, 7 3 rd Cong., channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. 2 nd Sess. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep H. Doc. 233, 7 6 th Cong., through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between 1st Sess. breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 H. Doc. 149, 86 th Cong., feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. 1st Sess.8 Deepen, widen and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and H. Doc. 87 th Cong., E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; 2nd Sess.5 enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and H.R. 973, 89th Cong., Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to 1st Sess. full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickel Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. 22-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 5 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior breakwater. Mar. 3, 1899 Present project depth in basin and entrance to Chicago River. Jul. 25, 1912 Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater Mar. 2, 1919 Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Mar 3, 1931 Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Mar. 2, 1945 Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; deepen channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the Jul. 30, 1983 interests of navigation. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong. 2 nd Sess. and Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790-2791 H.Doc 710, Cong, 2d Sess H.Doc 1303, 64th Cong, 1St Sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H.Doc. 485, 8 7 th Cong., 2 nd Sess. 4 Sec. 107 of P.L. 97-88 P.L. 98-63 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar 2, 1919 CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 6 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of Jun 3, 1896. Turning basins Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908, as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 7 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 5 6 th Cong. 1St Sess. (Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report 1909, p. 709) H. Doc. 1294, 6 4th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc 767, 7 8 th Cong., 2 nd Sess.6'7 H. Doc. 1113, 60 th Cong., 2 nd Sess. H. Doc. 690, 6 2 nd Cong., 2 nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2 nd Sess. 22-22 Jul. 11, 1870 Jun. 14, 1880 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 Jul. 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 28, 1937 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar, 3, 1889 Reduce channel length to be maintained in extension to Lake George Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks Authorized Secretary of War to sell to Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 14 1st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel, 28 feet in outer harbor and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E. J. and E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION (See Section 8 of Text) Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 9 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier enclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present location. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Jun. 21, 1927 Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier enclosing outer basin. Public Law 176, 67 th Cong Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 7 1 st Cong., 2 nd Sess. Public Law 219, 7 2 nd Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 7 2 nd Cong., 1 st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 7 5 th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 195, 86 th Cong. 1St Sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong. 1St Sess. Section 1142, WRDA of 1986 Recommendations of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Rpt 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Cong. approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69 th Cong., 1st Sess. 22-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Jul. 14, 1960 Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning Sec. 107 basin to E. Street Bridge. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Jun. 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins. Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. Jun. 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Jul. 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers and enlarging inner basin. Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 I( I I I F I1 F C Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer I end of north pier to project depth in lake and dredge an anchorage area 1 in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at 2 widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. River and Harbors Committee Doc 34, 74 th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report dated June 19658. Annual Rpt 1880, p. 142 Annual Report 1882, pp. 277, 2162. H. Doc. 343, 56 th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 27, 71 st Cong., 2 nd Sess. H. Doc. 116, 77 th Cong., st Sess. H. Doc. 368, 90 th Cong., nd Sess. Nov. 17, 1986 CASINO BEACH, IL (See Section 14 of Text) Provides for encasing approximately 1,800 feet of the existing Casino Feasibility Report Beach jetty in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap and replacing dated Feb. 1983. beach fill. Nov. 17, 1986 ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for 46 offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long, initial beach nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards and periodic nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards at 5-year intervals. Feasibility Report dated June 1982. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 17 of Text) Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Jul. 30, 1983 Public Law 97-88 Provides for operations and maintenance of shore protection measures. Public Law 98-63 22-24 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Work Authorized INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN (See Section 18 of Text) Beach nourishment of 2-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 22 of Text) Removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN (See Section 24 of Text) Widening and deepening 1,250 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch, installing 4,880 feet of pipe and excavating 2,850 feet of open channel. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL (See Section 25 of Text) Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Sections 21 and 26 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50% of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork Reservoirs Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservoir. Documents Sec. 501, WRDA 1986 Sec. 602, WRDA1986. Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 Feasibility Report dated April 1984 Sec. 3, WRDA 1988 H. Doc. 100-72, 10 0 th Cong., 1st Sess., Sec. 401, WRDA 1986. River and Harbor Act (Sec. 116) Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program Sep. 6, 1943 and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Include in Public Works Administration Program Sep. 6, 1933 and Jul. 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1989. 22-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway North Breakwater 4,630 Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL 6. Chicago River, IL West Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Waterway Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No.5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet Turning Basins 1, 3 and 5 Shore Arm Extension Exterior Breakwater Exterior Breakwater Southerly Extension North Inner Breakwater South Inner Breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin 22-26 1,200 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 678 1,043 1,200 5,593 6,714 5,007 2,450 2,979 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,000 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 400 Varies 620 620 200 100 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 30 28 27 27 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN Northerly Breakwater 1,120 Easterly Breakwater 2,525 Approach Channel 7,200 800 29 Outer Harbor 7,200 Varies 28 Entrance Channel 3,600 65-280 27 Main Channel 7,400 61-210 22 Turning Basin 22 Lake George Branch 3,700 64-160 22 Calumet River Branch 2,500 160-260 22 9. Michigan City Harbor Detached Breakwater 1,304 22 IN West Pier 835 East Pier 2,276 East Breakwater 1,000 Entrance Channel 1,900 150-425 18 Main Channel 2,400 120-150 18 Outer Basin 900 900 8-12 Trail Creek 3,000 50-100 8 Trail Creek 2,300 50 6 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater and Shore Connection 1,896 North Pier into North Revetment 2,074 South Pier 3,111 Entrance Channel 3,250 390 22 Channel to Inner Basin 1,700 200 18 Inner Basin 1,650 375-500 18 Anchorage Area 1 1 8 iArea of about 6 acres. 22-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges1 1967 $1,625,068 1Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16,1966. P.L. 89-670 TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL1 1975 65,611 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 SAuthorizedby River and Harbor Act of 1954. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1999 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 Kankakee River Ice Management 1993 44,791 22-28 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 ---- ---- Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 ---- ---- Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov 17, 1986 ---- ---- Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov 17, 1986 53,136---- Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN Widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 10 6 th Street and closing the gap between breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. 1990 Jan 1, 1990 ---- Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration ---- Nov 18, 1991 ---- ---- 22-29 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY............................23-2 2. Kentucky Lock................................ .................... 23-3 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY........................23-3 4. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S................................................................23-4 5. Navigation Work Under Special A uthorization ...................................................... 23-4 Alteration of Bridges 6. Authorized Alteration of Bridges..........................23-4 Flood Control 7. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN ............................... 23-4 8. Black Fox, Murfree & Oaklands Springs, TN ...... 23-5 9. Hamilton County, TN.........................................23-5 10. M artins Fork Lake, KY ......................................... 23-5 11. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY ......... 23-6 12. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, V A and K Y ........................................................... 23-6 13. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) ...................... 23-6 14. Inspection of completed flood control p rojects ................................................................ 23-6 15. Flood control work under special authorization ............................................... .........23-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 16. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN..............23-7 17. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, T N and K Y ............................................................. 23-7 18. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ................................................... 23-7 19. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY............23-8 20. Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY .................................................... 23-8 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost & Financial Statement.....................23-9 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation ........................ 23-11 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects................................. ............... 23-13 Table 23-D Not Applicable ............................................... Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....................................... .........23-13 Table 23-F Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power....................23-14 Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects .......................... 23-14 Table 23-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principal Features.................................23-15 Table 23-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions.......23-16 Table 23-J Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project....................................23-17 Table 23-K Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ..................... 23-17 Table 23-L Reservoirs .......................... ................. 23-17 Table 23-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................................... 23-18 Table 23-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization......................................23-18 General Investigations 21. Surveys................................................................23-8 22. Collection and study of basic data......................23-8 23. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 23-8 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, KY, about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, KY, from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, KY (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provide for construction of hydroelectric powergenerating facilities at Cheatham Dam, rivermile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, TN and KY, to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 23- H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, TN, varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, TN, has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,904. (See table 23-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Celina Dam was deauthorized in 1995. Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, TN, (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, TN (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tail water at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville as shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 42 terminals on the Cumberland River (5 Municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 32 privately owned facilities). A total of 18 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sands, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance improvements included repair of the power plant roof and redrill and clean out of the drain holes at Barkley Dam. A major rehab study of Barkley Power Plant was initiated. Work continued on the inspection and repair of all lock dewatering structures. Picnic shelters were installed at Sycamore Creek on Cheatham lake, Defeated Creek on Cordell Hull Lake, and the Environmental Education Area on Old Hickory Lake. Riprap was placed below Old Hickory Dam on the left bank. Approximately 45,000 cubic yards of material was removed from three sites by hired labor channel maintenance dredging on the Cumberland River. An estimated 24 million tons of commodities were locked through the Cumberland River Locks. Commercial lockages were approximately 6,000 and 6,500 recreational craft were also locked through. 23-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Total sales energy generated at Barkley Darn (601,451,000kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois Power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hosier Energy Division. Total sales energy generated at Cheatham Dam (191,818,000kw-hr), Cordell Hull (297,334,000 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (470,630,000 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. KENTUCKY LOCK ADDITION, KY Location. Kentucky Lock and Dam is located in western Kentucky at Mile 22.4 of the Tennessee River between Livingston and Marshall Counties. Existing Project. Kentucky L&D was completed in 1945 by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). TVA continues to operate the dam and powerhouse while operation of the 110' x 600' navigation lock is the reponsibility of the Nashville District. Products from 20 states pass through the system of Kentucky and Barkley Locks, the lower-most locks on the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers, respectively. Over 80% of the commercial tows hauling these products pass through KY Lock instead of Barkley Lock because of difficult and costly navigation on the Cumberland River below Barkley. Since most of the tows are greater than 600' in length, they must perform a time-consuming double lockage to transit through the existing 600' long KY Lock. This results in average delays between five to six hours per tow under existing traffic levels. Since the traffic levels are expected to grow in the near future, these delays will also increase. The last traffic forecast developed in 1995 estimated that 43M tons of products would be transported through the Kentucky- Barkley system in the year 2000. Actual tonnage for the system in 1997 was 43.5M tons and has leveled out over the few years since. It costs a tow about $400/hour to wait in line at the lock. Construction of a new 1200' lock would eliminate the delay time in the near term and drastically shorten it for forecasted traffic levels past the year 2020. Project Description. The 1992 Kentucky Lock Feasiblity report recommended a new 110' x 1200' lock adjacent and landward of the existing 110' x 600' lock. The project was authorized for construction in WRDA 96. Average annual benefits attirubted to a new lock are $55.1M. Most of these benefits are associated with improving the performance of the lock by reducing traffic delays and disruptive lock outages for maintenance and major rehabilitation work. Based on an estimated construction cost of $395M (Oct. '97), the new lock has a Benefit/Cost ratio of 2.5. Other project features in addition to the new lock itself are three major relocation efforts: 1) four large TVA transmission towers, 2) about 2 miles of the Paducah and Louisville Railway, including a major river bridge, and 3) about 2 miles of US Highway 62, also including a new major river bridge. Operations during fiscal year. FY 1999 funding of $12.6M was used to advance the design of the project and to continue construction of the relocation of the transmission towers. Significant activities include: 1) completion of initial construction and base condition testing of the General Model at the Waterways Experiment Station; 2) continued design of the lock including advancements in the upstream and downstream approach walls, upstream and downstream cofferdams, miter gates, culvert valves, floating caisson, east bank permanent embankment, site development, and electrical/mechanical features; 3) major advancement of the P&L Railroad relocation Design Memorandum and completion of P&S for the Walker Cemetery access road, 4) initiation and substantial completion of the Highway Relocation DM, 5) continued geotechnical land and overwater exploration for the RR and Highway relocations and approach walls, and 6) completion of technical analyses for the Highway Relocation Environmental Assessment. Construction activities included the acquisition and storage of structural steel required for the new transmission towers and sheetpiling required for downstream mooring cells. 3. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, TN. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by the TVA of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, TN. (See table 23-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on the Tennessee River (13 municipally owned, 15 government owned facilities and 122 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $13,272. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance included dewatering and repairs to Guntersville Main and Auxiliary, and Ft. Loudoun Locks. New miter gates anchor bars were installed at Kentucky Lock. A lift device was fabricated for the new bow truss dewatering closure for Ft. Loudoun. New slot fillers and needle dam dewatering closure were fabricated for Wilson Lock. Reinforced grating was fabricated and installed at Watts Bar Lock. Armor plating on the upper guard wall and the travelling bitt were repaired at Pickwick Main Lock. Work continued on inspection and repair of all dewatering closures. Approximately 15,000 cubic yards of material was removed from one site by hired labor channel maintenance dredging on the Tennessee River. An estimated 52 million tons of commodities were locked through the Tennessee River Locks. Commerical lockages were approximately 24,000 and 26,200 recreational craft were also locked through. A ten year program to maintain Chickamauga Lock was begun. Work included installation and evaluation of additional instrumentation. The lock was dewatered for inspection and repairs. Concrete cores were tested for shear stress properties. A finite element model was developed for prediction of stress concentration and deflections of the lock. Post-tensioned anchors were installed in the concrete monoliths and additional post-tensioned anchors for lock walls were designed. Performed risk and reliability analysis. 4. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. Construction for the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. The Mobile District is responsible for operation and maintenance of the entire Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. The project is 100% complete. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period no money was expended for Section 107 Projects. Alteration of Bridges 6. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman-Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 7. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATIONAL AREA, KY AND TN Location. The project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was 23-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage was not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically established the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 232B for authorizing legislation). The authorized cost (ceiling) for the project was $156,122,000. $112,588,920 was appropriated to The Corp of Engineers for design and construction of park facilities. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. 72% of the authorized project is complete. By Memorandum of Agreement dated 1 October 1990 jurisdiction of the area was transferred to The Department of Interior. Local cooperation. None required. Operation during fiscal year. The Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. In accordance with this agreement, miscellaneous minor construction items were completed. 8. BLACK FOX, MURFREE, AND OAKLAND SPRINGS, TN Location. Black Fox, Murfree, and Oaklands Springs, wetlands lie in Murfreesboro, Tennessee Existing project. Project features at all three sites include trails, boardwalks, observation platforms, parking, removing exotic invasive vegetation, and planting native species. At Oaklands the planting of all tree species native to Tennessee and heritage gardens will enhance the existing antebellum mansion. Ecosystem restoration features include the creation of additional wetlands and in-stream structures. Murfree Springs plans include demolishing several existing buildings to provide space for an environmental education center and creating additional wetland habitat. A master plan for an environmental education center and improvements at each site was completed in FY95. FY96 appropriations of $148,000 were used to initiate PED. FY97 funds were used to begin a decision document for the entire project and site plans for Oaklands and Black Fox. FY98 funds totaled $2.7 million. A portion was used to substantially complete the draft decision document and continue plans and specifications for the environmental education center (which the government is designing, but not constructing). Local cooperation. The project authorization by WRDA 1996 and the City of Murfreesboro, TN is the local sponsor. Cost sharing is 75% Federal and 25% non- Federal. Real estate costs over 25% will be borne by the Federal Government. Operations during fiscal year. FY99 work included responding to higher-level review comments, revision of the decision document and refinement of the project design. 9. HAMILTON COUNTY STREAMBANK STABILIZATION, TN Location. The project is on the Tennessee River, in central Chattanooga, TN from river mile 464 to 468. The bank stabilization will consist of stone protection and bioengineering measures at approximately 8 sites along this reach of the river. Existing project: High floodwaters have caused slope failures and erosion along both previously protected and unprotected areas of the riverbank. Endangered facilities include a large interceptor sewer line (which serves a major portion of North Chattanooga), riverwalk trails, observation decks, fishing piers, drain pipes, ramps, power poles, roads, bridge abutments and parks/recreation facilities. Planned streambank protection is stone armament using graded limestone (referred to as "riprap"). Local cooperation: WRDA of 1996 authorized $7.5M (Federal) for Streambank Stabilization. Hamilton County is the project's sponsor; the City of Chattanoog is also sponsoring the project through a separate agreement with Hamilton County. Chattanooga and Hamilton County provided funding to initiate a feasibility study in FY97 ($150K) under our Work for Others Program. The Corps received $1.4M in FY98. Operations during fiscal year: Funds received during FY99 were used to prepare a Detailed Project Report (DPR) and Environmental Assessment (EA), execute a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA), and initiate construction. The Final DPR was approved in February. 10. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam is concrete type, 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, is available during the potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project prevents a major portion of average annual 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 flood losses at Harlan and results in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and to other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. The dam sluice gates were inspected. 11. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away form present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 12. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $385,060,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-Federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Various relocation contracts associated with the flood protection project continued. Contracts also continued for the diversion of the Cumberland River and levee at Loyall/Rio Vista, floodwall and closure structures, and channelization in Middlesborough. Construction contracts for a levee at Williamsburg were substantially completed. Nonstructural evacuations and floodproofings continued at Harlan Barbourville, Williamsburg and Middlesborough, KY 13. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-K. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $34,612. Total cost to September 30, 1999 was $508,078. For project inspection data see table 23-M. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $294,368 for disaster preparedness. 23-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 16. CENTER HIll LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, TN. It is in DeKalb County, TN., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, TN. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenance maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (334,894,000 kwhr) was made available through the Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. Operations and Maintenance work included investigation of leakage through the rim of the dam. A major rehab study of the power plant was initiated. Construction was completed on a comfort station at the dam and a fish cleaning station was installed. Dam Safety: $173,770 was expended in FY 99 to settle real estate cliams regarding Center Hill Spillway flowage easements. No additional work is anticipated. the project stabilizes the main dam and increases spillway capacity by addition of an erodible fuse plug embankment just upstream of the primary structure. This allows normal operation of the project up to a 75 percent probable maximum flood (PMF) and erosion of the fuse plug above this level to prevent failure as a result of catastrophic flooding. 17. DALE HOLLOW IAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, TN. It is in Clay County, TN, and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, TN 28 miles north of Cookeville, TN, and 3 miles east of Celina, TN. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, KY, and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, TN. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use an conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (105,898,000 kwhr) was made available through the Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, and management and maintenance of public-use facilities. Work was completed on replacement of the power plant alarm system. 18. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO, RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, TN.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, TN. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Darn was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total sales energy generated (55,532,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of public-use facili- 23-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 ties. Work was completed on the rewind of the power plant generator. Drain holes in the dam were redrilled and cleaned out. Florence Road was paved. 19. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, KY water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total sales energy generated (50,787,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association for distribution. The power plant SCADA system (remote control) was replaced. 20. WOLF CREEK DAM - LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.0 (above mouth) in Russell County, KY, about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, KY. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, KY. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,372 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. WRDA 96 authorized an Uprate Project of the hydroelectric powerplant. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (708,032,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. A trash collection gate was designed, constructed, and is now in operation near Williamsburg, KY. Concrete cracks were repaired in the power plant water intake area. A showerhouse was constructed at Fall Creek Falls and a picnic shelter was replaced at Mill Creek. General Investigations 21. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $1,169,486 for which $184,588 was for Navigation Studies, $82,187 for Flood Damage Prevention Studies, $692,559 for Special Studies, $107,968 for Miscellaneous Activities and $102,184 for Coordination With Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $140,796, which for Floodplain Management Services. 23. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs for this period were $331,192 for which $406 was Watershed/Ecosystem Projects (Black Fox/Oakland Springs), ($6,188) for Navigation Projects (Kentucky Lock) and $336,974 for Flood control Projects (Metro Center Levee and East Ridge). 23-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY98 FY99 Sep 30, 1999 1. Cumberland River TN and KY 2. Kentucky Lock TN and KY 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL, and KY 4. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 7. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 8. Black Fox/Oaklands Springs, TN 9. Hamilton County, TN 10. Martins Fork Lake, KY 11. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 12. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 16. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 17. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 18. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 19. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 320,252,2401,2,3 - - - 320,252,2401,2,3 24,045,808 23,354,000 21,372,000 21,603,000 465,803,9264 23,823,240 23,798,538 21,241,148 22,307,391 465,731,1495 2,000,000 2,726,000 3,957,000 8,876,000 22,059,000 2,253,535 2,784,980 3,856,189 8,649,300 21,714,805 - - - - 16,251,428 6 - - - - 16,251,428 6 14,185,000 13,053,000 13,023,000 16,693,000 294,090,048 7 14,059,643 12,996,888 13,187,838 16,622,146 293,697,878 8 --- - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 0 0 0 0 749,013,050 17,704 0 0 0 749,013,050 -75,000 0 0 0 112,588,920 9 55,402 81,775 -41,469 20,186 112,525,698 10 148,000 287,000 1,426,000 465,000 2,326,000 71,919 249,765 716,410 365,228 1,403,322 - - 909,000 1,040,000 1,949,000 - - 110,274 479,425 589,699 762,000 883,715 60,000 56,803 18,462,026 26,051,806 785,000 767,093 38,000 42,402 25,523,000 23,048,466 562,000 581,314 48,000 35,430 27,986,000 20,452,349 - 20,479,911 - 20,479,911 652,000 11,460,340 680,231 11,459,209 - 817,830 11 - 817,830 11 50,000 2,405,166 62,696 2,405,167 18,491,299 334,735,825 12 26,398,835 326,462,079 13 - - - - 53,412,02214 - - - - 53,412,02215 5,039,000 4,770,000 4,163,000 5,309,000 99,250,87616 5,016,033 4,851,338 4,005,131 5,532,725 99,210,498 17 - - - - 28,317,74618 -- - - 28,317,74619 3,895,000 4,206,000 3,669,000 4,117,000 87,158,027 20 3,940,177 4,180,726 3,734,697 4,154,911 87,151,933 21 - - - 56,914,03922 - - - 56,914,03923 3,392,000 4,160,000 3,300.000 3,650,000 66,997,651 24 3,392,833 3,805,105 3,771,642 3,674,280 67,984,726 25 - - - 56,741,232 - - - 56,741,232 1,501,000 1,283,000 1,166,000 1,251,000 22,025,943 26 1,244,690 1,574,973 1,167,224 1,279,616 22,005,601 26 23-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY99 Sep 30, 1999 20. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - - - 83,267,95827 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost 83,267,95827 Maint. Approp. 5,036,000 7,676,000 8,974,346 6,652,104 126,838,18328 Cost 5,104,269 7,374,806 7,831,643 7,917,894 126,542,17929 Rehab. Approp - - - 104,999,23730 Cost 104,999,23730 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous project.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and excludes $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $21,797,316 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $20,160,752 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $1,083,678 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 fund provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 23-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized Project and Work Authorized Documents in Text Act Jul 13, 1892 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 12, 1996 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 19342 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 Oct 17, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 Jul 3, 1930 Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville, via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. Authorized construction of Kentucky Lock for navigation only. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. Authorized ecosystem restoration at three wetlands and historic sites in Murfresboro, TN. Authorized hydropower update at Wolf Creek Dam TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. May 18, 1933 Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Authorized flood damage reduction by nonstructure methods in Hamilton County, TN. WRDA 96 23-11 S. Doc 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 96 Annual Report 1884, p. 1663 Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 WRDA 96 WRDA 96 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Oct 12, 1996 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 TABLE 23-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct 12, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 Aug 28, 1937 WRDA 96 WRDA 96 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 761, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Authorized a study for a bank stabilzation project on the Tennessee River in Hamilton County, TN. Authorized assistance to non-Federal interests for enviromental activities in Jackson County, AL. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Mar 7, 1974 Authorized Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Jul 24, 1946 Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. 4. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong. 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-12 H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. 16. Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C Project Caney Fork River, TN Clinch River, TN and VA Duck River, TN Elk River, AL and TN French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN Holston River, TN Little Tennessee River, TN Obey River, TN Red River, TN South Fork of Cumberland River, KY TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Report see Status Annual Report Constru, abandoned 1895 $ 27,8 abandoned 1923 53,9 abandoned 1887 13,( abandoned 1904 4. abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned 1931 1911 1888 1887 1884 1892 Cost to Sept, 1999 Operation and ction Maintenance 28 - )49 $ 7,873 )00 - )00 - 249,605 5,714 5,510 11,500 5,000 11,967 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Co Report see 33,554 ost to Sept, 1999 Operation an r r Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 23-13 ---- -- , REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 Project Status Barkley Dam and Lake beneficial use Barkley, KY and TN Celina Dam, KY inactive Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use For l Repx Annua ast Full Cost to Sept, 1999 )rt see Operation and l Report Construction Maintenance - $156,588,634 1 $151,979,353 2 222,575 31,682,762 110,521,840 2 79,874,492 76,718,154 2 52,266,412 126,511,832 2 1. Includes $10,089,990 cost for Cross Creek. 2. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY" See Table 23-H TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Federal Contributed Report see Funds Funds Project Annual Report Date and Authority Expended Expended Three Islands Reservoir, 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, $111,855 Ohio River Basin, TN 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Middlesboro, Yellow Creek - Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, Bell County, KY 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cumberland River above - Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Nashville, TN Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Hiwassee River, Polk and 1923 Authorized: River & Harbor Act 123,065 Bradley Counties, TN Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Rossview Lake, Tennessee - Authorized: FC Act, Jan 28, 1938, 6,779 and Kentucky PL 76175th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Celina Lake, Kentucky Authorized: Rivers and harbors and Tennessee Act of 1946. PL 79-522. Deauthorized: July 9, 1995, Section 1001 (B) (2) of PL 99-662. 23-14 TABLE 23-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS (Including Power) NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPAL FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet)1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guard-sills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level): Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canel: Length (mile) Bottom width (feet) Depth a minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Percent of project completion Year opened to navigation Cost9 Kuttawa, KY 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 60 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,0003, 4 259,000 610,000 2,082,00 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 8 1964 $156,588,634 10 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acrefeet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during non-flood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 10. Includes $10,089,990 cost for Cross Creek. 23-15 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 Old Hickory TN, 3 miles 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,6052 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 4503 Carthage, TN 5 miles 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,1382 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 5083 508 501 499 13,920 85,6005,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 385 382 7,450 19,8007 84,200 104,000 442 27,450 125,0005 63,000 357,000 545,000 3 12,000 36,000 1952 $31,682,762 4 25,000 100,000 8 1952 $52,266,412 3 33,333 100,000 8 1973 $79,874,492 TENNESSEE RIVER (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) TABLE 23-I Project1 Kentucky Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock Main lock Wilson: Auxiliary lock Main lock General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: 1t Auxiliary lock Main lock Nickajack: Auxiliary lock Main lock Chickamauga Watts Bar Fort Loudon Melton Hill (Clinch R.) Miles Above Mouth Miles from Nearest Town 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, KY 206.7 4.4 axbove Hamburg, TN 206.7 4.4 albove Hamburg, TN 259.4 2.9 axbove Florence, AL 259.4 2.9 alxwve Florence, AL 274.9 184 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 349 0 9 1 below Guntersville, AL 349 0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 424 7 39 4 below Chattanooga, TN 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 529 9 68 above Breedenton, TN 602.3 1 3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22 1 above Kingston, TN Lock Dimension Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Chainm- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character of Navi- Kind (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation of Dam 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 60 292 94 100.0 11.04 11.2 Limestone 300 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 60 400 48 51 5 13 2 14 7 Limestone 110 600 48 51 5 130 130 Limestone 60 360 39 45 0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 110 600 39 45 0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 110 600 39 41.0 130 130 Limestone 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13 0 Limestone 60 360 49 53 0 13.0 10 0 Limestone 60 360 58 70 0 11 8 12 0 Shale 60 360 72 80.0 11 8 12.0 Limestone 75 400 54 60 0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed 1937 Fixed 1984 Fixed 1927 Fixed 1959 1934 Fixed 1963 Fixed 1937 Fixed 1965 Fixed 1967 Fixed Fixed 1939 Fixed 1941 Fixed 1943 Fixed 1963 Fixed Cost of Type of Each Lock Construction and Dam Concrete and 2 earthfill Concrete and 3 earthfill Concrete and 3 earthfill Concrete and $46,973,5405 earthfill 7 Concrete and 1,796,2956 earthfill Concrete and7 earthfill Concrete and earthfill Concrete Concrete Concrete and earthfill Concrete and earthfill Concrete 3&7 7 77 3&7 3 3 2 1 II D1)oc3 28, 71 Cong, 21 sess, contains table, pp 98 and 99. giving pertinent infonation concerning low dams contemplated under 5 Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec 124, National )efense Act of June 3 1916 (0 )oc 1262 6th Cong, 1st 1930 project Annual Report for 1938, pp 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low cdamsin addlclitiotno existing locks Actual cost of lock and dam and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority 6 Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the (Corps; clams constructed by tennessee Valey Authority 2 Lock antd clam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority 7 Constnructed by Tennessee Valley Authority 3 Lock and clam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and futnds 4 lailsvwateirn canal; flight of 2 lcks sess) s NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 1999 (See Section 3 of Text) Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,23612 $15,078,603 $278,607,605 $295,930,444 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compen-- 5 5 sation, rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,23612 $15,078,608 $278,619,270 $295,942,114 1. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,336 was trans- tion and care of works of improvement under provisions of approferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes priation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended between 1890 and June 30, 1935, on opera- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 23-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Type of Estimated Cost Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel Improvement 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 TABLE 23-L RESERVOIRS Total Federal Tributary Basin and Reservoir Steam Cost Center Hill Lake Caney Fork 53,412,0221 Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY Obey River 28,317,7461 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones River 56,914,039 1,2 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel River 56,741,232 3 Martins Fork Lake, KY Martins Fork 20,479,911 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 23-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1999 TABLE 23-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 Corbin, KY Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 - Lake City, TN Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 Pineville, KY Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 Spring City, TN Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Nov 1998 - Apr 1999 TABLE 23-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 99 Cost Section 205 Coordination Account $ 11,790 Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL 16,198 Dallas Branch, Huntsville, AL 9,536 Sinking Creek,Murfreesboro, TN 2,151 Muscle Shoals, AL 1,908,707 Huntsville Spring Branch, AL 170,408 Emily Ave / Tim. St., TN 4,787 Richland Creek, Morgantown, TN 12,081 Doe River, Carter Co, TN 41,928 Lick Creek, Clinch Riv, Russell Co, VA 30,430 Beason Creek, Adamsville, TN 18,184 Mud Creek, Hendersonville, NC 24,727 Double Springs, Rutherford Co, TN 24,906 Little River, Hopkinsville, KY 11,056 Oak Grove, Christian Co., KY 42,397 French Broad River, Madison Co., NC 48,986 Bakersville, NC 54,428 Buena Vista Pipeline, Muscle Shoals, AL 86,999 Shoal Creek, Lawrenceburg, TN 6,395 Town Creek Basin, Lenoir City, TN 10,746 Upper Power River (VA) & Tributaries 17,252 Big and Little Mocassin Creeks, VA 5,937 Elk River, Fayetteville, TN 4,159 Beaver Creek & Tribs, Bristol, VA 2,074 $2,566,262 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 98 Cost Section 14 Coordination Account $11,809 Clifton, Wayne Co., TN 177,923 Ditto Landing, Huntsville, AL -18,490 Cumberland River, Ted Rhodes Golf Course, TN -16 Tennessee River, Mile 645-647.3 19,099 Ross Landing, Chattanooga, TN 237,952 Clarksville Fairground, TN -363 Shelby Bottoms Greenway & Park, TN 244,277 Interceptor Sewerline, Chattanooga, TN 6,510 Tennessee Riverpark-Frye Fish 33,896 Beaver Creek, Bristol, TN 15,448 Mousetail Landing State Park, TN 2,848 French Broad River, Water Treatment Plant, NC 9,929 Pistol Creek, Maryville Public Fac, TN 32,571 N. Chickamauga Creek, Dayton Pike Bridge 59,894 Duck River Sewer Main, Columbia, TN 88,395 Bryson City, (Lackey Hill Pump Station), NC 30,160 Cumberland River, John Merritt BLVD, Nash, TN 9,401 Dry Creek WTP, Cumberland River, Davidson Co., TN 22,418 Blannahassett Island, French Broad River 2,677 $986,338 23-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT This district encompasses southwestern Ohio, all of Central Kentucky and portions of western and eastern Kentucky, the southern 3/4 of Indiana, and southeastern Illinois, all included in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to the mouth of the Ohio. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Channels and Habors Page 1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY ...... 24-2 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio R iver.............................................................. 24-2 3. Green and Barren Rivers, KY....................... 24-2 4. Kentucky River, KY ...................................... 24-2 5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River .................. 24-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... 24-3 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.............................................. 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 8. Duck Creek, OH ........................................... 24-3 9. Holes Creek, OH .......................................... 24-3 10. M ill Creek, OH ............................................. 244 11. Ohio River Flood Protection ........................ 244 12. Pond Creek, KY ............................................ 244 13. Salyersville, KY ............................................ 24-5 14. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY............. 24-5 15. Southern & Eastern, KY ............................... 24-5 16. Wabash River, New Harmony, IN ................ 24-6 17. White River, Indianapolis Central Waterfront, IN ................................. 24-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 18. Barren River Lake, KY.................................. 24-6 29. Brookville Lake, KY ...................................... 24-7 20. Buckhorn Lake, KY ....................................... 24-7 21. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ................................ 24-7 22. Cagles M ill Lake, IN ...................................... 24-7 23. Carr Creek Lake, KY .................................... 24-8 24. Cave Run Lake, KY ....................................... 24-8 25. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN ............................. 24-8 26. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH .... 24-9 27. Green River Lake, KY ................................... 24-9 28. J. Edward Roush Lake, IN ............................ 24-9 39. Mississinewa Lake, IN ................................ 24-10 30. Monroe Lake, IN ......................................... 24-10 31. Nolin Lake, KY ............................................ 24-11 32. Ohio River Basin (Louisville District) .......... 24-11 33. Patoka Lake, IN .......................................... 24-11 Page 34. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ........................................ 24-11 35. Salamonie Lake, IN ..................................... 24-12 36. Taylorsville Lake, KY ................................... 24-12 37 W abash River Basin.....................................24-13 38. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH..............24-13 39. William H. Harsha Lake, OH ..................... 24-13 40. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.................................24-14 41. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....24-14 42. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization.............................................. 24-14 General Investigations 43. Surveys ........................................................ 24-14 44. Precontruction Engineering and Design ..... 24-15 45. Coordinattion with other Agencies ............. 24-15 46. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............. 24-15 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement......24-16 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ............... 24-21 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................................ 24-25 Table 24-D Not applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................................ 24-26 Table 24-F Not applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 24-28 Table 24-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems ........... 24-30 Table 24-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ................................ 24-31 Table 24-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ....................... 24-35 Table 24-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...........................24-35 Table 24-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 24-38 Table 24-M General Investigations ................ 24-40 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING RIVER, KY Location. The Licking River originates in southeast ern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 531.5) upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 436.2). Existing project. There are no locks and dams on the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, oil products, and coal are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel. Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into the Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above the mouth of Green River. Existingproject. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to provide, were constructed in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from the Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY and a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Of these facilities, only Green River L&D 1 and 2 are still operational. Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, 6 and Barren River L&D 1 are maintained by the Corps in a caretaker status. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2 and Green River. Maintenance of fencing at the properties of Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River L&D 1. A mooring facility at Green River L&D 3 is also maintained. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Dam 3 on the Green and Dam 1 on the Barren are in fair condition and the locks at those locations are in poor condition. Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs have been permanently deferred. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-footdepth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45* Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the Commonwealth of Kentucky on May 21, 1985. The Commonwealth of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease expired on October 15, 1989, and Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. The Commonwealth of Kentucky continued operation again under a lease agreement signed in 1990 with several extensions that allow the Commonwealth to operate the Locks until 2019. The Corps continues to operate Locks 1 through 4 on a twoshift, year-round operation. In Fiscal Year 1993 the Corps began repairs to dams 5 through 14 in preparation for transfer to the Commonwealth. In fiscal year 2000 the Corps will begin repairs to the middle sections of dams 13 and 14. Physical completion is scheduled for fiscal year 2001. Dam repairs were physically completed in fiscal Year 1998. In December 1996 the Assistant Secretary ofthe Army (CW) signed the quitclaim transfer deed for Lock and Dam 10 for direct transfer from the Corps to the Commonwealth. The Corps continues efforts to transfer Locks and Dam 5-9 and 11-14 to the Commonwealth. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1999, $337,205. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance on Dam 4 stabilization was started. Projected to be complete in FY 00. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length ofriver covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-C. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 8. DUCK CREEK, OH Location. The project area is located in the City of Cincinnati and the Village ofFairfaxin Hamilton County, Ohio. The project encompasses 3.2 miles of the stream and begins approximately 2 miles upstream of the confluence of Duck Creek with the Little Miami River. Existing project. The project consists of approximately 7,100 feet of concrete flood wall, 3,300 feet of earth levee, 8,500 feet of riprapped stream bank, 1,200 feet of channel relocation, 1,100 feet of culvert, demolition of an abandoned highway bridge, widening of a railroad bridge, a pump station, and automatic road closure, and an emergency access road. Estimated cost ofnewwork (1999) is $22,550,000 ofwhich $16,913,000 is Federal and $5,637,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the City of Cincinnati and the Village of Fairfax. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in December 1997. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes real estate acquisition and completion of plans and specification on two phases. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 15 percent complete overall with design approximately 80 percent complete. 9. HOLES CREEK, OH Location. Project area is located on Holes Creek in West Carrollton, Montgomery County, Ohio. West Carrollton is situated in the southwestern portion of Ohio and is a suburb of Dayton. Holes Creek drains 28.2 square miles and empties into the Great Miami River at river mile 72.6. Existing project. Project consists of approximately 4,300 feet of channel widening (80 foot bottom width) with associated bank protection. The existing box cul- 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 vert type Conrail bridge will be replaced with a 70 foot clear span structure. Project will provide protection to 428 structures in West Carrollton and Moraine. Estimated total cost of new work is $7,945,000 Federal and $1,300,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the Miami Conservancy District (MCD). MCD formed the Holes Creek/Owl Creek Conservancy Subdistrict to act as formal sponsor for this project. The Conservancy Court of Montgomery County approved the Subdistrict in December, 1994. An official plan and an appraisal record prepared by the Subdistrict were approved in November, 1995, enabling the Subdistrict to enter into the Project Cooperation Agreement with the Government in September 1996. Funds will be provided to the Subdistrict by Montgomery County, the City of West Carrollton, the City of Moriane, and Miami Township. Operations during fiscal year. Work this fiscal year includes award of the second and final construction contract. Conditions at end offiscal year. Project is about 25 percent complete overall. Design is complete. 10. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Forke. Existing project. 17.5 miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, three pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. A Contributed Funds Agreement for the General Reevaluation Report was executed in August 1998. An Operations and Maintenance Agreement for the completed portions of the project was also executed in August 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has initiated a Geneeral Reevaluation Report that will provide a new course of action for completing the project. In addition, an agreement was executed wherein the Corps can complete repairs to previously constructed sections of the project and turn them over to the local sponsor for assumption of full maintenance on those portions of the total project. All further design and construction activities are unprogrammed. Maintenance: During the 1999 flood season no benefits were realized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction channel and levee-Sections 2,3,4A, and 7A, Phase 1, are complete. Project is about 52 percent complete overall. The General Reevaluation Report is approximately 30% complete. 11. OHIO RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION (INDIANA SHORELINE), IN Location. The six existing local flood protection projects are located along the Indiana shore from Ohio River mile 492 in Lawenceburg downstream to mile 792 in Evansville. They are in the communities of Evansville, Tell City, Cannelton, New Albany, Jeffersonville- Clarksville, and Lawrenceburg. Existing project. Each of the six local flood projects were constructed by the Corps and have been locally operated and maintained. All six projects were constructed to protect against the 1937 flood plus three feet of freeboard. Rehabilitation measures are necessary at each of the six sites in order to maintain their integrity and to insure that they continue to provide the benefits for which they were designed. Rehabilitation would consist of sliplining (or where necessary replacement) of all pipes and culverts which are part of the flood protection facilities, replacing aging pump station equipment, restoring expansion joints and closures, and repairing, as needed, floodwalls and other structures. Estimated cost of new work 1999is $5,462,000 Federal and $1,821,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The following Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA) have been executed with the communities: Lawrenceburg PCA - September 1998, Evansville - November 1998, Tell City PCA - June 1998, Cannelton PCA - September 1999. The New Albany and Jeffersonville-Clarksville PCAs are scheduled for November 1999. Operations during the fiscal year. Work this year includes execution of the PCAs at each community and completion of the plans ans specifications. Construction contracts were awarded at two communities. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is about 20 percent overall with design approximately 50 percent complete. 12. POND CREEK, LOUISVILLE, KY Location. The project is located in the central and eastern portions of the 126 square mile Pond Creek watershed in southern Jefferson County, Kentucky. Existing project. The project consists of constructing a 1500 acre-feet detention basin storage facility along Northern Ditch. An existing abandoned rock quarry adjacent to Fishpool Creek will be converted to a detention basin. Approximately 2.4 miles of the Pond Creek channel will be enlarged as well as 1.5 miles of Northern Ditch. A multi-purpose maintenance road/ recreation trail will be constructed along the length of the Pond Creek channel improvement. In addition, three inactive settling basins owned by the local sponsor 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT will be converted into an environmental restoration site. Estimated cost ofnewwork (1999) is $19,300,000 ofwhich $13,538,000 is Federal and $5,762,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD). MSD has included all funds necessary for their cost share of the project in their capital budget plan. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in March 1998. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes finalizing the plans and specifications for the Melco Basin construction contract and completing construction work on the quarry detention basin and environmental restoration site. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is about 35 percent complete. Design is 85 percent complete . The first two phases of the construction project have been substantially completed. The Melco Basin design was completed and will be advertised for construction once all project lands are obtained by the sponsor. 13. SALYERSVILLE, KY Location. Project is located along the banks of the Licking River from approximately mile 266 and 271 in Magoffin County, Kentucky along the Mountain Parkway about 75 miles southeast of Lexington, Kentucky. Existing Project. The most cost-effective and feasible plan to provide the authorized level of protection (1978 flood protection) is called the "Cut-Thru Plan" and includes two channel cut-thrus, a barrier dam at the upstream cut-thru, and an 0.8 mile reach of channel improvement connecting the two cut-thrus. Estimated total cost of new work is $8,541,000 of which $7,730,000 is Federal and $811,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The local sponsor qualifies for an "ability to pay" reduction pursuant to Section 103(m) of the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Based on current costs and economics, the local sponsor share would be 9.5 percent of the total project cost. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1995. The construction contract was awarded in September 1996 and completed in July 1998. Operations during the fiscal year. Construction was completed. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is complete. However discussions are underway to determine what additional work might be performed with remaining project funds. 14. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Cost of new work is $70,049,492, of which $60,207,439 is Federal, and $9,842,053 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirements by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1,2,3,4,4A,5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Project was transferred to local interest on September 8, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Expenses to collect a judgement from a contractor who installed pumps and motors at the Pond Creek Pumping Station continued. Project is 100 percent complete except for the collection ofthe judgement from the pump contractor. During the 1999 flood season, no benefits were realized. 15. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY Location: The project location comprises a 27 county region in southern eastern Kentucky, which includes portions of the Louisville , Huntington, and Nashville Districts. The program is for the design and construction assistance of environmental infrastructure projects in that region. Existing Project. Three (3) projects are under way in the Louisville District: a sewer line extension in Menifee County, near the community of Means; a sewer line and wetland treatment system along Caney Creek in Breathitt County; and a water line extension along Bill Hall Branch in Floyd County. Total cost of these three projects is estimated at $1,200,000. Two other projects are under consideration: a sewer line extension in Corbin, Ky, and design of a wastewater treatment plant and sewer line in Salyersville, Ky. Work is authorized under Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-303). Local Cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA) were executed with Menifee County and Beaver Elkhorn Water Districts. PCA negotiations are under way with Breathitt County, City of Corbin and City of Salyersiville. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year included award and construction of the Menifee County 24-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 project, preparation of preliminary plans & specifications for the Breathitt County project, and award of the Beaver Elkhorn Water district construction contract. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Menifee County project is essentially complete. Construction of the Beaver Elkhorn Water District Project is under way. Design of the Breathitt County project is 25% complete. 16. WABASH RIVER, NEW HARMONY, IN Location. The project is located in Posey County in Southwestern Indiana along the left bank of the Wabash River. The town is about 120 miles southwest of Louisville, Kentucky, and seven miles south of 1-64. Existing Project. The project consists of providing erosion control along the left bank of the Wabash River at New Harmony, Indiana. This will be accomplished by placing stone beginning at a point 950 meters (3117 feet) upstream ofthe State Highway 66 bridge and continuing upstream for a distance of 1470 meters (4823). To comply with environmental commitments, wildlife supporting hardwood seedlings will be planted along the project right-of-way. Estimated cost ofthenewworkis $2,828,000 of which $2,121,000 is Federal and $707,000 is non- Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partners are the Town of New Harmony, Indiana and the Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). Both cost sharing partners included all funding necessary for their cost share ofthe project in their FY 99 and FY 00 budgets. A Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) package was prepared and forwarded to ASA (CW) for review and approval. The Town of New Hamony has signed the PCA and IDNR will sign the document by December 1999. Operations during the fiscal year. Work this year includes completion and execution of the PCA, acquisition of required real estate by the local sponsors and possible award of the construction project. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. The project is about 25 percent complete. Design of the project is complete and construction has been authorized and fundingprovided. 17. WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, IN Location. Project is located along the White River in the City of Indianapolis, IN. Existing project. Project consists of infrastructure improvements such as public access parking, walkways, pedestrian bridges, landscaping, lighting, and water features. The project also includes continuous public access along both sides of the White River waterfront through the construction ofwalkways, bike paths, landscapedpromenades, and the rebuilding and reconfiguring of the existing concrete slopewalls. Estimated cost of new work is $39,975,000 Federal and $48,529,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the White River State Park (State oflIndiana) and the City of Indianapolis. All lands for the project have been acquired by the sponsors. By the end of 1998 approximately $31,000,000 of construction funded by the sponsors was completed. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in December 1997. An admendment to the PCA was executed in June 1999 to add the Upper Canal feature to the Project. Operation during fiscal year. Work this year includes award of two construction contracts and continuation of the remainder of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 60 percent complete overall with design approximately 85 percent complete and construction about 60 percent complete. Flood Control - Reservoirs 18. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast ofScottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Common wealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1999 flood season estimated damages of $378,000 were prevented. Recreational benefits were $48,353,942. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 19. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). Aminimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Cost of completed new workis $45,402,565 of which $37,905,073 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions ofWater Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: During 1999 flood season estimated damages of $208,000 were prevented. Routine maintenance was performed. Recreational benefits were $22,819,919. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 20. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1999 flood season prevented damages of $149,000. Recreational benefits were $11,304,985. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 21. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity ofreservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, ofwhich 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of new work is $62,881,010 Federal and $5,037,000 non- Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions ofWater SupplyAct of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $516,000 were prevented during the 1999 flood season. Recreational benefits were $41,970,804. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 22. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Cost of new work is $4,369,997, which includes $4,256,903 Federal funds, and $113,094 contributed funds for construction ofrecreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category ofthe completed projects program was signed bythe State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1999 flood season prevented damages of $2,585,000. Recreational benefits were $7,490,358. Condition at end offiscalyear. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. Recreation facilities constructed under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program are complete. 23. CARR CREEK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8- foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Cost of completed work is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Under the terms of a new lease, the State of Kentucky will assume operation of the Irishman Creek Beach and Campgroundin 1996. This establishes a State Park at this lake also providing the impetus for additional resort development. The Kentucky Department of Parks completed the first year of operation of the campground and beach area. The transition to a state park was successful. Project name was changed from Carr Fork Lake, KY to Carr Creek Lake, KY effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104-303, 12 October 1996. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1999 flood season prevented damages of $115,000. Recreational benefits were $14,345,718. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. 24. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Cost ofnew work is $81,159,541 of which $6,900,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1999 flood season prevented damages of $1,216,000. Recreation benefits were $11,100,171. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is complete. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 25. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost ofcompletednew workis $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $1,793,000 were prevented during the 1999flood season. Recreational benefits were $36,363,022. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed bythe State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 26. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acrefeet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 forwater quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Projectwas authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $22,000 were prevented during the 1999 flood season. Recreation benefits were $22,582,488. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 27. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, consisting of $33,105,184 initial project funds, $40,001 for water supply, and $317,145 Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15,1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $582,000 during 1999 flood season. Recreational benefits were $30,793,096. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 28. J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost for new work is $19,621,777 made up of $19,428,355 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,422 non-Federal contributedfunds 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Project name was changed from Huntington Lake, IN to J. Edward Roush Lake, IN effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104-303,12 October 1996. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $12,896,000 during 1999 flood control season. Recreation benefits were$10,768,155. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 29. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,379,800 made up of $23,791,816 Federal cost for the initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category ofthe completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Continued, unexplained, settlement along 300 feet ofthe crest ofthe dam is occurring at an approximate rate of 0.5 inch per year. An on-site meeting with Headquarters and Division representatives was held to assess the problem and receive guidance. Headquarters has recommended a three phased, comprehensive investigation and evaluation to begin in FY 1999 to determine the cause of the subsidence and the remedial measures required to correct it. Initial investigations and evaluation began in FY 1999. The Louisville District is currently preparing a Dam Safety Assurance Report to recommend modifications that would ensure the structural integrity and operational adequacy of the project. This report will be submitted in mid FY 2000. However the project has not yet been put on the HQUSACE High Priority List. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $29,759,000 during 1999 flood season. Recreation benefits were $26,489,905 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 30. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacityis 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,570,774 consisting of $7,032,484 Federal funds, $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to lowflow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category ofthe completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $985,000 during 1999 flood season. Recreation benefits were $37,518,249. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 31. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gatecontrolled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details ofproject, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Cost of new work is $17,193,278 including $2,594,274 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Kentucky has assumed responsibility of the Brier Creek site to establish a State Park in 1996. The Brier Creek campground was successfully operated by Kentucky for the first year as state park. Improvements are planned by Kentucky. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1999 flood season no damages were prevented. Recreation benefits were $52,613,975. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 32. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 33. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Cost of new workis $73,316,892 ofwhich $53,134,447 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,182,445 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent ofthe joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintainingwater supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Sinkholes in the spillway area that are connected to porous limestone layers continue to be an operational concern. A study was completed and recommended as $7.2 million major rehabilitation of the dam. Operation for flood control during the 1999 flood season prevented damage estimated at $9,092,000. Recreational benefits were $25,029,570. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Real Estate relocation work is complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. 34. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Chan- 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 nel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction ofrecreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification ofpreviously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18,1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category ofthe completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1999 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,499,000. Recreational benefits were $59,979,057. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 35. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Cost for new work is $17,039,321 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $163,867 non- Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1999 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of$19,160,000. Recreation benefits were $19,904,514. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 36. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is an earth and rockfill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works are slide gate controlled and spillway is uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacitywill be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Cost of completed new workis $87,004,456, including $82,991,363 federalfunds and $4,013,093 non-federal funds. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which maybe through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, the U.S. 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to remove debris from Taylorsville Lake was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1999 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $565,000. Recreation benefits were $24,868,541. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and design studies are complete except for design of a comfort station. Land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. Two sections of county road were washed out by heavy rainfall. Both sections were originally upgraded for project operation prior to washout. The repairs were completed by the Corps in 1996-97 at a cost of $700,000. 37. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 38. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, ofwhich 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1119 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management ofrecreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Operation for flood control during 1999 flood season prevented damages estimated at $22,000. Recreation benefits were $26,820,655. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 39. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia,OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of complete new workis $52,023,157 and a estimated $3,485,840 non- Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by Public Law 96- 383, October 6, 1980. 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major capital replacements requiredfor the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A new water intake structure was completed in 1995 to support a regional public water supply system. Operation for flood control during 1999 flood season prevented damages estimated at $39,000. Recreation benefits were $30,364,623. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1970. Project is complete and reservoir was placed in operation in February 1978. 40. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-K for the latest dates of inspection performed on the local protection projects, channel improvements, and bank revetments). Fiscal year costs were $219,965.69. Total costs to September 30, 1999, were $5,163,873. 41. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-E. 42. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Environmental restoration activities pursuant to Section 1135,1986 Water Resources Act, as Amended. Costs for fiscal year were $1,510 for one PDA; $25,670 for three feasibility reports; $9,132 for plans & specifications on one project; $262,968 for two projects under construction; $7,951 for preliminary restoration plan one project; and $9,844 for coordination activities. Reflects federal cost only, for full costs see table 24-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Cost for fiscal year were $165,615 for fourteen feasibilityreports; $149,086 for plans and specifications on four projects; $3,798,082 for five projects under construction; $1,183 for one project completing construction; $16,287 for six terminated studies; and $13,449 for coordination activities. Reflects federal cost only, for full costs see table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $60,121 for PDA on eight projects; $833,086 for two projects under construction; $146,798 for four projects completing construction; and $12,314 for coordination Activities. Reflects federal cost only, for full cost see table 24-L. Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration (Section 206). Cost for fiscal year was $318 for two feasibility reports; $2,890 for one preliminary restoration plan; and $8,646 for coordination activities. Emergency flood control; activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. The District had no disasters requiring formal activation of its Emergency Operations Center this fiscal year. However, the District responded to numerous HQUSACE UOC requests for assistance to South Atlantic Division (SAD). At the beginning ofthe fiscal year, the district was still furnishing TDY personnel for emergency response activities (FEMA Mission Assignments to the Corps of Engineers) in Puerto Rico as a result of the devastating effects of Hurricane Georges. Fourteen District personnel were assisting in the mission on 1 October, and the District was represented in Puerto Rico through mid- April. During the period from 12 June through 1 October, the District Emergency Manager filled the position of "Acting Division Emergency Manager" for SAD, which coordinated the Corps' response activities associated with Hurricanes Dennis and Floyd. The District Emergency Manager subsequently responded to a HQUSACE UOC request for assistance to SAD and filled the position of ESF #3 Team Leader in response to Hurricanes Irene and Jose' during the period 15 through 22 October. The District's Emergency Operations Program Manager also responded to a HQUSACE UOC request and filled the position of Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Manager in the South Atlantic Division EOC during the period 15 September through 04 October and again during the period 15 through 22 October. Subsequent to the passage of Hurricane Floyd's onslaught of the Carolina coasts, the District's "Debris Removal PRT" was activated and responded to a FEMA Mission in Horry County, South Carolina, to coordinate with HorryCounty, South Carolina, and contract for the removal of flooddebris from the public rights-of-way. The mission started on September 23 and continued until 4 November. Costs for fiscal year were: $381,049 for Disaster Preparedness; $36,220 federal funds and $129,884 in reimbursable funds for Emergency Operations; and $21,869 for inspection of non-federal flood control works. The District also performed a total of $919,482 in reimbursable work for other federal agencies for FY99. General Investigations 43. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs was $3,725,589 for one Navigation Study; $596,249 for fifteen Flood Damage Prevention 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Studies; $10,127 for three Special Studies; $191,132 for one Review of Authorized Projects; and $70,784 for four Miscellaneous Activities. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 44. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $135,990 for one Navigation projects; $372,980 for four Flood Control Projects. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 45. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Fiscal year total cost was $20,436 for one Coordination with other Agencies projects and $23,085 for three Planning Assistance to States projects. 46. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total cost was $177,670 for nine Flood Plain Management projects; and $4,077 for one Hydrologic Studies. 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1996 1997 1998 1999 Sep 30,1999 Navigation- Channels and Harbors 1 Open Channel Work, New Work Licking River Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Navigation -Locks and Dams 3 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10,000 35,974 16,500 (1,369) 187,816 10,665 36,018 16,423 (1,292) 187,816 0 0 13,808,222 1 13,808,222 1 1,302,000 1,737,411 1,922,000 1,929,836 47,330,297 2,3 1,381,129 1,735,685 1,920,778 1,953,241 47,330,267 4 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control, Local Protection 8 Duck Creek 9 Holes Creek, OH 10 Mill Creek, OH 11 Ohio River Flood Protection (Indiana Shoreline), IN 12 Pond Creek, KY 13 Salyersville, KY 14 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4,176,749 4,176,749 2,769,000 2,612,233 2,452,000 2,743,908 79,318,432 4,5,45 3,148,755 3,230,687 2,451,441 2,810,773 79,313,667 4,5,46 556,956 556,956 466,000 868,000 882,000 2,216,000 55 259,476 428,979 1,398,032 2,086,487 56 190,500 179,245 2,396,439 1,404,691 4,170,875 31 125,894 216,331 627,953 2,873,681 3,843,858 32 (320,000) 566,000 1,955,000 (444,800) 98,856,942 306,379 663,830 604,847 937,195 98,835,377 10,000 1,000,000 1,300,000 1,718,633 4,028,633 57 10,000 151,651 272,167 1,088,735 1,522,553 58 0 1,500,000 143,000 117,184 1,760,184 53 0 189,635 243,753 1,018,888 1,452,276 54 702,519 4,242,000 2,155,500 0 9,180,019 10 663,277 4,687,385 1,374,736 73,116 8,205,870 11 0 24,000 20,137 0 60,225,220 9 8,781 46,468 7,164 409 60,207,439 9 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1996 1997 1998 1999 Sep 30,1999 15 Southern & Eastern, KY New Work Approp Cost 16 Wabash River New Harmony, IN New Work Approp Cost 17 White River, Indpls New Work Central Waterfront, IN Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 18 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19 Brookville Lake, IN 20 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21 Caesar Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22 Cagles Mill Lake, IN New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 880,00 92,448 0 880,000 139,659 232,107 470,000 1,860,000 2,330,000 4,058 12,738 16,796 2,000,000 7,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 18,000,000 175,318 298,960 4,520,218 8,696,191 13,690,687 0 27,479,717 12 0 27,479,717 12 1,814,000 1,734,020 1,766,658 2,058,008 34,066,307 13, 14, 15 1,774,385 1,751,562 1,774,487 2,119,336 34,062,923 13, 14, 15 0 0 0 0 45,402,565 16 0 0 0 0 45,402,565 16 711,000 685,239 782,000 747,289 11,881,252 47 725,573 689,164 788,799 752,636 11,880,849 47 0 0 0 0 11,766,206 17 0 0 0 0 11,766,206 17 1,137,000 1, 072,107 1,211,100 1,131,876 21,346,006 18 1,150,973 1,106,692 1,265,461 1,154,188 21,345,392 1 0 62,881,010 0 62,881,010 1,416,000 1,338,199 1,305,608 1,384,505 16,684,320 48 1,408,709 1,322,433 1,376,329 1,386,968 16,683,760 48 4,369,997 19 4,369,997 20 565,000 661,977 717,079 699,208 11,669,931 552,757 670,768 723,230 706,443 11,669,155 23 Carr Creek Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 0 $50,854,826 18 0 $50,854,826 18is 1,493,000 1,316,804 1,400,000 1,294,586 20,832,175 19 1,523,428 1,308,457 1,417,835 1,309,872 20,829,137 19 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1996 1997 1998 1999 Sep 30,1999 24 Cave Run Lake, KY 25 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, IN 26 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH 27 Green River Lake, KY 28 J. Edward Roush Lake, IN 29 Mississinewa Lake, IN 30 Monroe Lake, IN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost O 81,159,541 23 0 81,159,541 23 989,000 843,428 760,945 834,703 13,244,297 49 812,394 1,047,916 772,972 836,165 13,243,611 49 0 0 0 0 6,987,807 24 0 0 0 0 6,987,807 24 763,000 795,221 847,000 768,422 14,702,283 778,320 765,159 896,053 770,844 14,699,521 0 0 0 0 22,083,660 22,083,660 920,000 801,407 809,114 711,164 11,533,030 952,792 777,946 825,859 719,755 11,527,157 33,462,330 25 33,462,330 25 1,614,000 1,551,285 1,791,200 2,422,788 29,676,667 26 1,620,662 1,625,123 1,793,459 2,433,917 29,676,123 26 (481) 0 19,621,777 27 19,621,777 28 588,000 700,482 1,018,000 935,301 12,995,071 600,828 687,442 1,023,067 946,275 12,992,833 24,379,800 29 24,379,800 29 704,000 723,000 764,000 1,000,694 12,792,037 726,627 736,129 782,897 1,011,851 12,791,177 0 16,570,774 o 0 16,570,774 30 887,000 747,636 736,879 733,499 13,974,332 31 881,820 763,458 740,676 738,728 13,974,256 31 24-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1996 1997 1998 1999 Sep 30,1999 31 Nolin Lake, KY 32 Ohio River Basin Louisville District 33 Patoka Lake, IN 34 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvment, KY 35 Salamonie Lake, IN 36 Taylorsville Lake, KY 38 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 39 William H. Harsha Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost O 17,193,278 32 0 17,193,278 33 1,571,000 1,848,000 1,598,000 1,544,009 37,120,983 34 1,557,497 1,947,062 1,611,785 1,564,594 37,116,456 34 0 0 1,526,142 1,526,142 0 73,702,816 35 0 73,316,892 36 1,050,000 791,240 1,096,526 681,825 10,034,069 1,032,937 792,304 1,128,601 670,891 10,018,348 10,643,001 37 10,643,001 37 1,715,000 1,714,947 1,873,863 1,970,346 35,355,573 38 1,861,285 1,690,318 1,873,863 2,025,303 35,350,508 38 (6,830) 0 17,039,321 39 17,039,321 40 602,000 659,483 617,988 607,612 11,448,803 628,418 646,972 635,393 621,365 11,448,090 30,000 338,572 985,000 919,276 (104,159) 37,949 921,905 1,283,284 (13,979) 877 87,004,456 41 87,004,456 42 914,000 1,101,169 12,872,748 940,942 1,110,400 12,868,610 4,722,463 43 4,722,463 43 456,000 445,935 397,882 407,592 8,732,812 464,920 456,745 410,380 411,208 8,732,812 0 52,023,157 44 0 52,023,157 44 1,152,000 887,510 1,001,145 813,601 12,049,893 50 1,162,244 906,896 1,035,774 829,988 12,049,843 50 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3 Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4 Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 5 Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,187 contributed funds. Includes $1,312,478 in contributed funds. 8 Includes $1,312,478 in contributed funds. 9 Does not include contributed funds. 10 Includes $550,019 contributed funds. 11 Includes $541,992 contributed funds. 12 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. 13 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 14 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15 Includes $668,025 "maintenance & operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 16 Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. 17 Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 18 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 20 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 21 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 23 Includes $6,900,000 of U.S. Forest Service Funds. 24 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, & $353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 25 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 26 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $664,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 27 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 28 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 29 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 3o Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $870,343 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 31 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 32 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 33 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 34 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees and $52,000 Supplement Funds, $527,225 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 35 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 36 Includes $20,182,445 contributed funds. 37 Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 38 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $668,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 3 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 40 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 41 Includes $4,013,093 contributed funds. 42 Includes $4,013,093 contributed funds. 43 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities, and $520,000 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. 44 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 45 Includes $57,000 contributed funds. 46 Includes $45,194 contributed funds. 47 Includes $2,210 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 48 Includes $2,738 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 49 Includes $4,063 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 50 Includes $4,367 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 51 Includes $428,000 contributed funds. 52 Includes $428,000 contributed funds. 53 Includes $360,000 contributed funds. 54 Includes $181,141 contributed funds. 66 Includes $250,000 contributed funds. 56 Includes $199,521 contributed funds. 6' Includes $459,100 contributed funds. 58 Includes $120,102 contributed funds. 24-20 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Aug 11, 1888 Purchase of original improvement Mar 3, 1893 1 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Jul 13, 1892 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Jul 13, 1902 Construction of Lock 6, Green River Mar 3, 19052 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Mar 3, 1909 Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River Jul 3, 1930 2 Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widens bends in Bear Creek, KY Jun 26, 1934 3 Aug 30, 1935 2 Sep 3, 1954 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River revocation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River H. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Ann. Rept. 1887, p. 1903 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H.D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) Aug 28, 1937 Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected Document 1, 75th Congress, by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost 1st Session not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Flood Control Committee in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary Document 1, 75th Congress, of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial 1st Session accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control 2d Session and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an H.D. 535, 78th Congress estimated cost of $360,000 2d Session Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, H.D. 197, 80th Congress including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River 1st Session Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. Jul 3, 1958 Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for H.D. 192, 85th Congress, Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an 1st Session estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000. 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Mar 7, 1974 Directed use of $1,000,000 of funds appropriated in PL 104-46 for construction of the Ohio River Flood Protection, Indiana Project. H.D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) Construction of five multipurpose reservoirs and one local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provision that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment of project Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. Two Additional reservoir projects were deauthorized MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH Three dry bed reservoirs and a channel improvement were authorized in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. HAZARD, KENTUCKY Approximately 6 miles of channel improvement were authorized in Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Flood control measures to prevent a January 1957 flood reoccurrance in the vicinity of Hazard, Kentucky at a total cost of $30,000,000 was authorized for design and construction in Section 108 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 100-676 100th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 100-676, 100th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-640, 101st 2nd Session 24-22 Aug 13, 1968 Dec 29, 1981 May 1, 1997 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1988 Nov 28, 1990 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts WorkAuthorized Documents HOLES CREEK, OHIO Nov 17, 1986 The project for flood control, Miami River, Little Miami River, Interim Report No2, West Carrollton - Holes Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 23, 1981, at a total cost of $8,910,000, with an estimated first Federal Cost of $6,230,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $2,680,000. Aug 17, 1999 Holds the total amount projected as the non-federal share as of September 30, 1996 in the Project Coopreration Agreement executed on that date; and 100% of the amount of any increases in the cost of the locally preferred plan over the cost estimated in the Project Cooperation Agreement. SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY Nov 17, 1986 Flood control measures to prevent a December 1978 flood reoccurrence in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky at a total project cost of $7,000,000 wasauthorized for design and construction in section 401(e)(1) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. With respect to the project, Congress has determined that the benefits exceed the cost of such flood control measures. Nov 5, 1990 Provided $400,000 to construct the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Aug 17, 1991 Provided $600,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 section 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Sep 12, 1996 Additional $3,000,000 to continue construction of the Salyorsville, Kentucky cut-through. Nov 28, 1990 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY Flood protection in accordance with Plan R-1 of the Louisville District Commander's Re-evaluation Report, dated June 1990 and a executed LCA no later than October 1991 was authorized in Section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. POND CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY Provide $10,993,000 to construct the Pond Creek, Jefferson County, Kentucky project for flood control in accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 28, 1994. The major components of the Recommended Plan include detention basin storage and channel enlargement, in addition to wetland restoration and recreation. DUCK CREEK, CINCINNATI, OHIO Provide $11,960,000 to construct the Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio flood damage reduction project in accordance with the Chief of Engineers Report dated June 24, 1994. The project consists of floodwalls/ levees and channel relocation. NEW HARMONY, INDIANA Provide $2,100,000 for streambank erosion protection along the Wabash River at the town of New Harmony, Indiana. Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 106-53 106th Congress, 1st Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-514, 101st Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 102-104, 102nd Congress, 1st Session H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-640, 101st Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session 24-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION CONTINUED Acts WorkAuthorized Documents Sep 12, 1996 Aug 17, 1999 WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, INDIANA Provide $7,000,000 for construction of recreation facilities and rehabilititation of existing flood protection features in downtown Indianapolis along the White River. Authorized to undertake the riverfront alterations decssribed in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Plan, dtd Feb 1994 for the Canal Development(Upper Canal feature) and the Beveridge Paper feature, at a total cost not to exceed $25,000,000 of which$12,500,00 is the estimated Federal cost and $12,500,000 is the estimated non-federal cost. BEARGRASS CREEK, KENTUCKY Aug 17, 1999 The project for flood control, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dtd May 12, 1998 at a total cost of $11,171,300 with an estimated Federal cost of $7,261,500 and an estimated non-federal cost of $3,909,800. H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 106-53 106th Congress, 1st Session Public Law 106-53, 106th Congress, 1st Session 1Deficiency act. 2Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sep. 3, 1954 3Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 24-24 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1951 1858 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 $ 139,108 101,196 33,331 0 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River) 2 Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 8 Frankfort, South Frankfort,KY Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River) 2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN 2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) 2 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN Louisville, KY 4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 7 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River)6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) 2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclaire, IL Saline River & Tributaries, IL Shawneetown, IL7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 2 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY 2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River)2 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1997 1979 1998 1948 1960 1953 1959 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 & 1996 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 43,906,502 2,960,970 11,164,720 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,836,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,517,464 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 4,337,617 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 24-26 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status1 Report Construction Maintenance Uniontown, KY 1956 1,070,926 - Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) ' 1964 3,308,941 - West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,095,704 - Local Protection: Completed: Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN 2 641,398- Active: Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) - 157,935 - Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) 1976 153,410 - Louisville, KY 9 - 415,000 - Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH 9 - 514,964 - (Great Miami River) West Fork Mill Creek, OH (Winton Road) 9 - 477,649 - Fairfield,OH - - - Inactive: Blue River, Salem, IN - 15,000 - Cache River, Upper Basin, Ill - 44,000 - Columbus, IN - 283,000 - Gallatin County, IL Stmbk - - - Hazard, KY - - - Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 355,963 - Kentucky River National Recreation Area - - - Licking River, KY - - - Mount Vernon, IN - 30,000 - Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development - - - Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) 1964 - - Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL - - - West Fork Drakes Creek, TN & KY - 58,000 - West Point, KY - 4,490 - Whitewater River & Tributaries, IN & OH - 112,000 - Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) 1983 235,615 - Taylorsville, Lake, Floyd's Fork - - - Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,270,590 - Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1980 1,009,188 - Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,038,595 - Eagle Creek Lake, KY 1975 702,471 - Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,200,920 - Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) - 350,474 - Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,794,308 1 All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 4 Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from the City of Louisville, KY. Cost shown are for levee and pump plants. 6 The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 7 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project inactive. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 24-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control -Local Protection: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ - - Alton, IN - 1977 - - Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724- Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 - Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 - Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 - - Bromley, KY - 1977 - - California (Cincinnati), OH - 1977 16,465 - Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713 - Caseyville, KY - 1986 - - Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 - - Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343 - Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 - Cloverport, KY - 1986 - - Concordia, KY - 1986 - - Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN - 1977 - - Derby, IN - 1977 - - Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 - - Evansville, Howell II - 1992 - - Falmouth Lake - 1998 944,386 - Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 - Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) 1979 1992 - - Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 - Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 - Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000 - Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 - Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 - Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 - - Lewisport, KY - 1990 - - Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 - - Louisville Lake - 1998 2,355,395 - Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 - Madison, IN - 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977 - - Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975 - McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 - Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 - Milton, KY - 1977 - - Moscow, OH - 1977 - - 24-28 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT ABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - New Harmony, IN - 1977 - - New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 - Newport-Wilder, KY - 1990 - - Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 - Owensboro, KY - 1990 - - Patriot, IN - 1977 - - Prestonville, KY - 1977 - - Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Rising Sun, IN - 1977 - - Rockport, IN - 1977 - - Rome, IN - 1977 - - Russell and Allison, IL - 1992 52,088 - Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367 - Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 - - Shuffiebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487 - Smithland, KY - 1992 - - Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 - Terre Haute, IN - 1977 - - Tolu, KY - 1986 - - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 - Troy, IN - 1977 - - Utica, IN - 1978 - - Vevay, IN - 1977 - - Vincennes, IN (Partial) 1964 1986 - - Westport, KY - 1977 - - Wilders, KY - 1990 - - Flood Control- Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 - Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 - Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) - 1992 - - Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 - Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 - Metomora Lake, IN - 1977 - - 24-29 TABLE 24-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS LockDimensions Miles GreatestLength Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and Dam (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8 349.1 12.1 11.3 Shale and Coal 100 1956 2 $5,101,978 New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956 4,799,271 3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836 121,377 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839 125,718 5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 s 12.0 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1934 1,020,868 ,o 6 181.7 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 1905 168,415 BarrenRiver 1 15.0 11 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 12.0 9.3 Gravel 100 1841 12 871,565 13 KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) Kentucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 38.0 145.0 8.2 14 430.0 8.2 4.8 Rock and Clay 100 1839 15 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844 , 1,350,385 16 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 6 3 Rock 100 1844 5 - 5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 38.0 145.0 15.0 485.3 10.0 6.4 Rock 100 1844 15 17 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 14.0 499.3 94 6.4 Rock and Piles 100 1894 17 314,847 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 15.3 514.6 9.1 6.8 Rock 100 1897 17 290,788 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 52.0 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900 17 275,463 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52.0 148.0 17.3 550.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907 17 237,646 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 567.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907 7 221,500 11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 1906 17 296,593 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 602.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910 7 425,693 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915 7 461,476 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 637.6 8.6 6.0 Rock 100 1971 7 392,902 1 At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. o Does not include $179 434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5 Transferred t Sta te 338.0 Ohio River datum) 2 New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M funds at cost of $822,000. 3 Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 4 New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. SDoes not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 6 Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. 7 Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. SWith moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. SOperation discontinued August 1, 1951. 0 0 �3 C zH O H O 13 O 0 C December 1996. " Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 12 Piles in old gravel dam completed in 1934. 1" Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. 14 At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River Elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). a Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. SBuilt by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983: L&D 3 $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, $137,436. LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River)3 4 Boone County, KY Brookport, IL 5 6 Cannelton, IN 5 ' Cincinnati, OH 5 8 Covington, KY 5 9 Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 5 10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Evansville, IN 4 Frankfort, KY,North Frankfort (Kentucky River) 5 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort 5 Golconda, IL 5 12 Harrisburg, IL 10 Hawesville, KY 5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) 5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN 5 Louisville, KY s 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 4 5 New Albany, IN 56 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 5 7 Newport, KY 5 7 Paducah, KY 5 7 Perryville, KY, Chapin River Reevesville, IL (Cache River) 5 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Rough River, KY 3 4 Southwest Jefferson County Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 5 16 Tell City, IN 5 14 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN 5 17 (Wabash River)(completed portion) 5 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Salyersville, KY Channel improvement Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Levee Levee Channel improvement Wall and Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Channel Improvement $ 144,000 392,443 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 43,906,502 2,960,970 8,373,540 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,689 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 823,700 600,300 1,079,236 654,000 60,077,183 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 9,348,600 $ 18,000 83,000 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 5,500,000 $ 162,000 475,443 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 49,406,502 272,100 3,233,070 2,791,180 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 11,164,720 36 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,414 26,721,438 109,200 4,446,817 740,000 6,115,471 298,506 232,000 11,000 40,000 100,000 5,000 9,917,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 834,700 640,300 1,179,236 659,000 69,994,183 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 285,000 3,593,941 150,000 1,245,704 981,400 10,330,000 Inactive: Hazard, KY Channel Improvement 24-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Deauthorized: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 Alton, IN 30 Aurora, IN 31 Bellevue, KY 30 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) 5 33 Bromley, KY 30 California (Cincinnati), OH 31 Carrollton, KY 30 Caseyville, KY 5 34 Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) 3o Cleves, OH 30 Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 3o Cloverport, KY 5 34 Concordia, KY 5 34 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Derby, IN 30 Elizabethtown, IL 30 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creek 5 Grandview, IN 30 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 35 Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 35 Leavenworth, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River,IL 30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 17, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN 30 Lewisport, KY 5 35 Ludlow, KY 30 Madison, IN 30 Mauckport, IN 30 McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Metropolis, IL 5 34 Milton, KY 30 Moscow, OH 30 New Amsterdam, IN 30 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 37 New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) 3o Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Bank Protection Levee $ 292,000 255,000 4,300,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,220,000 396,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 728,000 590,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 3,340,000 580,000 4,600,000 653,000 4,630,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,850,000 2,180,000 1,580,000 2,090,000 3,410,000 724,000 1,160,000 1,490,000 610,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 3,070,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 664,376 616,000 $ 14,000 40,000 1,190,000 400,000 630,000 925,000 720,000 97,000 35,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 193,000 55,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 1,150,000 133,000 1,087,000 32,000 528,000 266,000 40,000 164,000 116,000 118,000 715,000 136,000 73,000 56,000 88,000 243,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 431,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 99,000 25,000 $ 306,000 27 295,000 5,490,000 1,970,000 1,710,000 28 2,175,000 2,470,000 2,317,000 431,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 921,000 645,000 223,000 24 620,000 712,000 574,000 24 4,490,000 22 713,000 5,687,000 23 685,000 5,158,000 23 1,736,000 244,000 3,014,000 27 2,296,000 27 1,698,000 28 2,805,000 3,546,000 28 797,000 27 1,216,000 1,578,000 27 853,000 24 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 3,501,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 763,376 25 641,000 24-32 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total New Richmond, OH 30 Wall and levee $ 3,200,000 $ 720,000 $ 3,920,000 Owensboro, KY 5 35 Wall and levee 886,000 195,000 1,081,000 Patriot, IN 30 Levee 753,000 372,000 1,125,000 Prestonville, KY 30 Wall and levee 1,710,000 55,000 1,765,000 Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 426,000 37,000 463,000 24 Rising Sun, IN 30 Wall and levee 896,000 280,000 1,176,000 Rockport, IN 30 Wall and levee 466,000 133,000 599,000 Rome, IN 30 Levee 359,000 67,000 426,000 Russell and Allison Levee, IN (Wabash River) 37- Shawneetown, IL 5 34 Wall and levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,380,000 90,000 2,470,000 Smithland, KY 5 35 Wall and levee 864,000 414,000 1,278,000 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 418,000 29,000 447,000 24 Tolu, KY 5 34 Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,050,000 191,000 2,241,000 25 Troy, IN 30 Wall and levee 502,000 133,000 635,000 Utica, IN 5 32 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Vevay, IN 30 Levee 1,170,000 146,000 1,316,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (Uncompleted Portion) 5 34 Wall and levee 3,340,000 3,340,000 28 West Point, KY 5 34 Wall and levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,000 24 Westport, KY 30 Wall 1,610,000 41,000 1,651,00 Wilder, KY 35 Wall and levee 10,800,000 959,000 11,759,000 26 1All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. 5 Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7 See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 22 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 28 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 29 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 30 Deauthorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 32 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 33 Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 34 Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 35 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 (b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 37 Deauthorized Jul 19, 1992. 24-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) RESERVOIRS Estimated Cost 1 TributaryBasin Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY 2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY 2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 Eagle Creek Lake, KY Red River Lake, KY Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY 2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH 2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake, IN 2 Complete East Fork of Whitewater River Deauthorized West Fork of Whitewater River Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River Inactive South Fork of Kentucky River Complete Middle Fork of Kentucky River Complete North Fork of Kentucky River Inactive Eagle Creek Inactive Red River Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River $ 37,905,073 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,278 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 27,800,000 38,551,692 $ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,402,565 35,300,000 4 108,418 6 27,479,717 223,733 13 33,462,330 69,100,000 4 17,193,278 22,612 10,643,001 60,700,000 8 11,766,206 50,854,826 - 27,800,000 14 1,794,308 40,346,000 81,162,282 125,000,000 81,162,282 7 125,000,000 8 62,893,882 5,037,000 9 67,930,882 52,023,157 3,485,840 9 55,508,997 West Fork of Mill Creek 3,622,302 Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River 1,100,161 10 4,722,463 4,256,903 113,094 6,633,812 353,995 7,902,827 8,667,947 53,095,790 20,568,369 4,369,997 6,987,807 16,570,774 73,664,159 'Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 2Details of this project given in individual report. 3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5For Code 713 recreaton development. 6Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 'Includes $6,900,000 United States Forest Service cost. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 9Reimbursement for water supply storage. to Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. 11 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 12 Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. 13 For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. 14 Latest cost estimate 1974 24-34 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 37 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost Construction Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 3 141,036,000 4 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 6 126,869,000 4 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 6 138,648,000 1 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 ' 40,000,000 8 Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Deauthorized 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 to10 'Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. t P aW aWRs.$8,749,000 reimbursable for 2Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 'Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 3Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $2,133,000 reimbursable for interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. initial recreation facilities. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1979. "Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 5Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. initial recreation facilities. o1L0a test cost estimate revision 1982. 6Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Local Protection Projects Brevoort Levee, IN Brookport, IL Cache River Levee, IL Cannelton, IN Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN England Pond Levee, IL Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Gill Township Levee, IN Golconda, IL Harrisburg, IL Hagerstown, IN Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY Sep 1999 Apr 1999 Aug 1999 Jun 1999 Jul 1999 Jul 1999 Aug 1999 Aug 1998 Sep 1999 Sep 1999 Jun 1999 Aug 1999 Aug 1999 Aug 1999 Sep 1999 Jun 1999 Sep 1999 Jun 1999 Aug 1999 Jun 1999 24-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Aug 1999 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Sep 1999 Louisville, KY Jul 1999 Lyford Levee, IN Aug 1999 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Aug 1999 Mount Carmel, IL Aug 1999 Muncie, IN Aug 1999 New Albany, IN Jun 1999 Newport, KY Jul 1999 Paducah, KY Mar 1999 Perryville, KY Aug 1999 Reevesville, IL Aug 1999 Rochester-McClearys Bluff Levee, IL Aug 1999 Rosiclare, IL Aug 1999 Shawneetown, IL Aug 1999 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Jul 1999 Sturgis, KY Aug 1999 Taylorsville, KY Jun 1999 Tell City, IN Jun 1999 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Aug 1999 Uniontown, KY Aug 1999 Vincennes, IN Sep 1999 West Terre Haute, IN Aug 1999 Channel Improvements Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY Aug 1998 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Sep 1998 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Jul 1996 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jun 1994 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1995 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Sep 1998 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Aug 1998 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1998 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co, IN Jul 1999 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Mar 1995 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1998 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Sep 1995 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Sep 1998 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Mar 1993 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1995 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Sep 1995 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Mar 1995 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Jun 1998 Tripplett Creek, Morehead, KY Sep 1998 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Sep 1998 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Mar 1995 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Aug 1998 Bank Revetments Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN Aug 1995 Crooked Creek, John Paul Park, Madison, IN Aug 1995 East Fork White River, Brownstown, (Jackson County), IN Jun 1993 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Jun 1993 24-36 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Great Miami River, Ice Jam Flooding, Port Jefferson, OH Aug 1995 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Aug 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.6) Sep 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.4) Sep 1998 Indian Creek, Burton Lane, Morgan County, IN Apr 1995 Licking River, Butler, KY Aug 1995 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Aug 1999 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Apr 1995 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1995 Nameless Creek, Warren County, IN Jun 1995 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Aug 1998 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1995 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Aug 1995 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Aug 1998 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jul 1994 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Feb 1995 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Apr 1995 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN Aug 1998 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Dec 1993 Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1991 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN Aug 1998 Patoka River, Jasper, IN Oct 1993 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Jul 1995 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN Apr 1995 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jul 1994 Wabash River, near Merom, IN Jun 1995 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Aug 1998 Wabash River, Terre Haute STP Outfall Sep 1998 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Jun 1995 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road Jun 1995 White River, Morgan County, Blue Bluff Road, IN Apr 1995 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Jul 1995 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Apr 1995 Wastewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Apr 1995 24-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Environmental Restoration (Section 1135) Coordination Accounting Fund8 9,844 - 9.844 Falls of Ohio, Wetlands & Fishery3 9,132 - 9,132 Hovey Lake, IN 2 16,200 - 16,200 Howell Park, Evansville, IN 4 257,470 - 257,470 Initial Appraisals 7 7,951 - 7,951 Monroe Lake Wetland & Fish Spawning Areas4 5,498 - 5,498 Caesar Creek Wetland/Prariel 1,510 - 1,510 Green River Headwater 2 829 - 829 Wabash River, Greenfield Bayou, IN 2 8,641 - 8,641 Flood Control (Section 205) Amberley Creek, Cincinnati, OH 2 18,378 - 18,378 Asaph's Creek, Standford, KY 6 461 - 461 Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY 4 698,560 60,535 759,095 Brushy Creek, Lawrence Co. 6 1,218 - 1,218 City Dam, Brevoort Levee, IN 4 375,551 41,724 417,275 Coordination Account8 13,449 - 13.449 Deshee River, Brevoort Levee, IN 4 297,529 33,340 330,869 Embarras River, Villa Grove, IL 2 7,444 - 7,444 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN 3 29,288 - 29,288 Flatrock River, Rushville, IN 4 2,209,051 224,489 2,433,540 Hinkston Creek, Millersburg, KY 6 4,000 - 4,000 KYRiver Lawrenceburg, KY6 1,885 - 1,885 N. Fork, KY River, Jackson, KY 4 217,391 102,602 319,992 N. Fork Elkhorn Creek, Georgetown, KY 2 18,840 - 18,840 Ohio & Cumberland Rivers, Smithland, KY 2 28,065 - 28,065 Ohio River, Silver Grove, KY 2 25,441 - 25,441 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN 3 20,757 47 20,805 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN 6 2,137 - 2,137 Rolling Fork River, Lebanon Junction, KY 3 95,519 - 95,519 Salt River, Burgin, KY 6 6,586 - 6,586 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 5 1,183 1,349 2,532 White River, Anderson, IN 2 25,584 20,620 46,204 Pigeon Roost Creek2 189 - 189 Licking River Flood Warning System3 3,522 - 3,522 North Panther Creek, Daviess County, KY2 20,827 - 20,827 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY2 4,234 - 4,234 Red River, Stanton, KY2 4,073 - 4,073 Town Branch, Nicholasville, KY2 3,918 - 3,918 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 4,929 - 4,929 Embarrass River, Lawrenceburg, IL2 2,999 - 2,999 Whitewater River, Connersville, IN2 694 - 694 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Big Vermillion River, Eugene Coverd Br. 1 6,930 - 6,930 Coordination Account 12,314 - 12,314 Eagle Creek, Indianapolis, IN 6 12 - 12 Mill Creek, Rd 550W, Park Co. 1 8,420 - 8,420 North Fork, Kentucky River, River Road, Whitesburg, KY 6 67,243 23,834 91,077 North Fork, Kentucky River, State Hwy 15N, Whitesburg, KY 5 79,511 32,352 111,864 Ohio River, Carollton, KY 6 32 - 32 Ohio River, Daviess Co. Middle Schoool, Owen 4 182,586 59,256 241,842 Ohio River, Perry County, IN 1 11,370 - 11,370 Whitewater River, Memorial Road, Fayette 1 11,025 - 11,025 24-38 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-L CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Ohio River, National Historic Site' 4,198 - 4,198 Ohio River, English Park, Owensboro, KY' 12,582 - 12,582 Great Miami River, Cincinnati WTP, Fair4 650,500 300,700 951,200 No. Fork Kentucky River, Vocational School' 832 - 832 Rolling Fork River, Nelson & Larue Counties1 4,404 - 4,404 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206) Coordination Account Fund8 8,646 - 8,646 Preliminary Restoration Funds 2,890 - 2,890 Green River/Tradewater River, KY2 159 - 159 Log Creek Church Rd, Pike Co, IN2 159 - 159 SPlanning and Design Analysis (PDA). 2 Feasibility Report. 3 Plans and Specification. 4 Construction Funds Received or Construction Underway. SConstruction Completed. 6 Study Terminated. 7 Preliminary Restoration Plan. 8 Coordination Account 24-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 43, 44, 45 & 46 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total SURVEYS Navigation Studies Ohio River Mainstem, Uniontown, KY, IL, IN $ 3,725,589 - 3,725,589 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Frankfort, Ky 10,670 - 10,670 Licking River Watershed, Butler, KY 2,951 - 2,951 Licking River Watershed, Cynthiana, KY 60,905 - 60,905 Licking River Watershed, Falmouth, KY 940 - 940 Licking River Watershed, North Fork, KY 2,181 - 2,181 Licking River Watershed, South Fork, KY 683 - 683 Metro Lexington 1,198 - 1,198 Metropolitan Louisville, Mill Creek, KY 250 - 250 Ohio River & Trib Recon St. (Metro Louisville S.W.) 409,947 - 409,947 Ohio River, Southeastern, IL 2,384 - 2,384 Panther Creek, KY 1,690 - 1,690 Upper Kentucky River Basin 510 - 510 Wabash River Basin Comprehensive, IN, IL 9,429 - 9,429 Paducah, KY 92,418 - 92,418 Metro Cincinnati 93 - 93 Special Studies Great Miami River, Oxbow Area, OH 7.952 - 7,952 Tippecanoe River, Sedlm, IN 2,133 - 2,133 Environmental Services Partnerships 42 - 42 Review of Authorized Projects Green River L&D #6 191,132 - 191,132 Miscellaneous Activities Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 10,105 - 10,105 Intra-Agency Water Resources Development 8,715 - 8,715 North American Waterfowl Management Plan 607 - 607 Special Investigation, KY 51,357 - 51,357 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Project - Lock and Dams Ohio River Greenway, In 135,990 - 135,990 Flood Control Projects -Local Protection Metro Indianapolis, Indianapolis North, IN 64,486 - 64,486 Metropolitan Louisville, Beargrass Creek, KY 297,263 125,629 422,892 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN 10,983 3,129 14,111 Wabash Scenic Corridor, IN 248 - 248 24-40 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS CONTINUED (See Sections 42, 43, 44 & 45 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Coordination with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interest Coop w/other Water Agencies 20,436 - 20,436 PlanningAssistance to States Dam Safety Plan, Hardy Lake, IN 41 17 58 PAS-KY-Jefferson County 22,987 13,362 36,349 PAS Negotiation Funds 57 - 57 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services 28,088 - 28,088 Quick Responses 3,997 - 3,997 SS-Gunpowder Creek, KY 15,515 - 15,515 SS-Monterey, KY 234 - 234 SS-Winchester, KY 1,029 - 1,029 Technical Service, General 47,265 - 47,265 Newburg, IN 28,590 - 28,590 Harrisburg, IL 18,410 - 18,410 HEC-WEAP Workshop, MI 34,542 - 34,542 Hydrologic Studies Hydrologic Studies 4,077 - 4,077 24-41 Huntington, WV, District All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. Improvements Page Navigation 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on O hio R iver ................................................. 25-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ........................................ 25-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ...................... 25-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects...............25-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ....................................... 25-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ....................................... 25-3 7. Bluestone Lake, WV ......................................... 25-3 8. Burnsville Lake, W V ........................................... 25-3 9. Deer Creek Lake, OH ........................................ 25-4 10. Delaware Lake, OH ............................................ 25-4 11. Dewey Lake, KY ............................................. 25-4 12. Dillon Lake, O H ......................... ...................... 25-4 13. East Lynn Lake, WV ......................................... 25-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, KY ........................................... 25-5 15. G rayson Lake, KY ............................................ 25-5 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, VA ............................................. 25-6 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA ................ 25-6 18. M assillon, O H ............................ ..................... 25-6 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ........................... 25-7 20. New ark, O H ...................................................... 25-7 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH..........25-8 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA ................ 25-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District)..............25-8 24. Paint Creek Lake, OH ........................................ 25-8 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ........................................... 25-9 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, W V ...................................... 25-9 27. Roseville, O H ................................................... 25-9 28. Summersville Lake, WV ..................................... 25-9 29. Sutton Lake, W V ............................................ 25-10 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, OH ....................................... 25-10 31. West Columbus, OH ......................................... 25-10 32. Yatesville Lake, KY .......................................... 25-11 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.......................................25-11 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................................... 25-11 General Investigations 35. S urveys .............................. ........................... 25-11 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................. 25-11 Tables Table25-A Cost & Financial Statement ................. 25-12 Table25-B Authorization Legislation ...................... 25-17 Table25-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................ 25-20 Table25-D Not Applicable Table25-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................................. 25-21 Table25-F Not Applicable Table 25-G Deauthorized Projects .......................... 25-22 Table25-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects .... 25-24 25-1 Page Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 ..4.N{.>A.:.,t:Y{fi ,:I.::G{.."j:l4 A}}:4 %>T.i . I...O. .54N:~}t :} } :':}{: f.:>iinr:,Ii} i :: : " y:";o;+i : :yc": :: v :"{ .".... y. ....f :i: w 7;y :..oo:. 35. Surveys Fiscal year 1999 costs were $5,942,273 itemized as follows: Location Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Review of Authorized Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination With Other Agencies Preconstruction Engineering and Design 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data Fiscal year 1999 costs were $157,977. FY 1999 Cost $4,976,055 465,595 110,006 10,789 29,746 203,431 82,995 63,656 25-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 Table 25-A Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 2. Kanawha River, WV (Existing Project) 2. Elk River Harbor, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Charleston Riverfront, New Work Park, WV Approp. Cost 9,167,000 7,580,284 7,101,300 7,726,397 9,298,635 7,451,425 7,008,331 8,282,289 -9,000 432,287 601 411,320 6,000 113,000 86,994 280,867 -20,000 518,203 0 519,855 15,000 -22,228 832 -2,933 27,853,699 1 27,853,699 1 171,704,449 2 171,674,271 2 130,984 3 130,984 3 2,422,490 2,420,923 4,370,121 4,370,121 2. Winfield L&D 2. Marmet L&D 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 7. Bluestone Lake, WV 8. Burnsville Lake, WV 9. Deer Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15,754,000 32,040,000 11,782,000 8,274,000 53,233,788 31,551,852 12,049,325 8,473,275 - 2,129,000 9,924,000 1,742,629 9,610,205 724,000 864,165 679,000 722,902 707,886 884,012 681,951 741,718 1,029,000 1,061,333 977,150 1,057,041 1,040,178 1,050,172 1,002,919 1,060,805 2,772,100 1,889,601 2,029,450 3,307,248 3,622,657 1,907,565 1,962,929 3,360,118 1,603,000 1,749,019 1,702,535 1,457,489 1,576,218 1,727,904 1,512,084 1,711,993 224,422,000 4 224,063,864 6 12,053,000 6 11,352,834 7 56,267,422 56,267,422 12,570,040 8 12,564,925 8 41,987,500 41,987,500 16,279,073 16,267,573 29,458,652 9 29,458,652 s 34,675,115 10 34,496,770 10 57,166,839 57,166,839 23,681,990 11 23,663,906 11 20,406,545 12 20,406,545 12 13,601,311,13 13,610,881 13 903,800 681,562 688,949 630,818 1,024,314 664,818 713,089 652,197 25-12 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 10. Delaware Lake, OH 11. DeweyLake, KY 12. Dillon Lake, OH 13. East Lynn Lake, WV 14. Fishtrap Lake, KY 15. Grayson Lake, KY 16. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, VA 17. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 7,631,821 7,631,821 901,800 689,237 652,300 657,441 939,974 649,172 714,700 667,985 1,428,000 1,447,981 532,000 655,608 1,434,454 1,386,026 800,000 727,532 1,229,070 1,293,057 782,000 782,016 1,431,847 1,457,908 1,090,315 851,140 1,547,000 866,890 1,038,975 652,667 1,444,813 953,056 1,085,452 668,500 1,493,000 2,102,837 1,400,300 1,394,241 1,499,173 2,075,019 1,477,694 1,404,485 1,457,500 1,515,767 1,552,475 1,262,554 1,487,401 1,467,710 1,587,817 1,299,986 926,000 793,867 1,120,800 987,424 921,212 769,099 1,139,640 1,017,170 1,488,600 1,381,273 1,076,025 1,186,343 1,551,480 1,274,821 1,171,950 1,214,559 4,629,000 17,338,232 30,050,555 20,323,000 28,930,431 22,473,326 20,377,601 20,788,522 18,324,936 14 18,316,178 14 7,845,547 15 7,845,547 15 28,654,594 16 28,654,020 16 3,644,315 3,324,507 30,218,135 17 30,218,135 17 12,910,187 18 12,900,787 18 85,872,963 85,872,963 26,869,929 19 26,867,340 19 54,754,126 20 54,754,126 20 23,021,556 21 22,984,424 21 19,162,741 22 19,162,741 22 18,856,733 18,856,678 20,444,383 23 20,444,283 23 25,150,073 24 25,137,637 24 389,213,787 25 374,104,802 25 25-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 18. Massillon, OH 19. Muskingum River Dams & Lakes, OH 20. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA 23. Ohio River Basin 24. Paint Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,000 1,231 -1,056 811 800 777 6,200 6,223 7,169,400 6,179,000 6,182,225 5,667,239 8,225,879 6,348,250 6,356,653 5,830,088 205,000 241,000 229,890 155,548 234,000 244,586 37,000 49,537 94,000 813,865 155,255 554,657 10,720 11,103 203,000 219,487 317,000 310,626 199,896 221,997 315,069 323,290 383,300 413,193 308,125 304,209 405,561 394,676 321,317 320,233 802,900 1,044,601 653,900 571,144 794,418 1,050,060 668,615 611,987 8,139,406 26 8,139,406 26 357,192 357,192 41,247,815 27 41,247,815 27 126,796,567 28 126,709,368 28 982,300 982,300 22,172,945 29 22,172,945 29 28,583,865 28,299,350 845,916 845,916 758,673 758,673 11,151,232 30 11,151,232 30 6,665,985 31 6,665,985 31 4,215,155 4,214,227 6,186,901 32 6,186,901 32 8,890,873 33 8,979,678 33 355,861 34 355,861 34 26,969,962 35 26,969,962 35 12,907,529 36 12,903,242 36 25-14 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep. 30, 1999 25. Paintsville Lake, KY 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV 27. Roseville, OH 28. Summersville Lake, WV 29. Sutton Lake, WV 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, OH 31. West Columbus, OH 32. Yatesville Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -55,000 -1,162 996,000 1,094,643 921,175 868,773 1,021,816 1,024,466 998,998 881,584 -40,000 -108,085 -25,555 42,530 1,406,000 1,520,494 1,404,470 1,399,225 1,414,289 1,490,472 1,474,197 1,417,407 1,265 -927 542 2,700 2,667 2,820 2,698 1,736,000 1,469,498 1,786,150 1,693,089 1,792,752 1,444,416 1,784,633 1,725,621 1,667,500 1,643,421 1,758,790 1,449,654 1,658,618 1,604,404 1,775,213 1,492,809 249,900 313,568 248,000 434,775 275,347 274,161 264,812 462,427 979,000 7,562,000 14,226,280 10,933,000 10,251,533 8,304,497 9,190,907 11,384,643 -488,000 139,948 -7,000 22,526 6,000 4,473 60,194,986 60,194,986 13,362,223 13,356,281 261,251,678 37 261,251,678 37 26,301,496 38 26,286,402 38 910,785 910,785 245,170 248,015 48,375,884 39 48,375,884 39 33,305,903 40 33,271,796 40 37,029,585 41 37,029,585 41 37,871,510 42 37,832,585 42 2,086,503 43 2,086,503 43 3,376,582 7,369,762 53,774,280 44 48,872,437 44 0 99,456,500 0 99,453,537 967,000 1,255,122 944,360 921,032 1,002,464 1,240,913 997,216 934,879 8,948,964 8,939,307 See page 25-16 for footnotes. 25-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 'Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 4Includes $98,191,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 5lncludes $96,278,725 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 6Includes $10,951,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 7Includes $10,263,942 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 8Includes $1,063 Maintenance and Operation funds. 9Includes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 0lncludes $2,795 Maintenance and Operation funds. "Includes $748,281 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 12Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. 3Includes $130,000 providedbythe Productive Employment Act of 1983. 14Includes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 15Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. '6lncludes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. '7Includes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 18Includes $1,924 Maintenance and Operations funds. "Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 20lncludes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 21Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $748,714 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 22Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 23Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 24Includes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 25Includes Cost from Ohio River Division of $696,000. 26lncludes $477,813 contributed funds. 27Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 28Includes $206,815 Maintenance and Operations funds. 29Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 30Excludes $160,082 contributed funds. 3Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 32Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 33Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 34Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 35Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 36Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 37Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 3"Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $85,233 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 39Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. 40lncludes $214,112 special recreationusefeefunds,$300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $82,875 Maintenance and Operation Funds. 4 'Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. 42Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $144,562 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 43Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 44Excludes $3,378,044 cumulative contributed funds. 25-16 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-B Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 15, 1985 Oct. 12, 1996 5. Oct. 23, 1962 6. Oct. 23, 1962 7. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct 31, 1992 8. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 9. Jun. 28, 1938 10. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 11. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 12. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. Construction of 110' x 800' replacement lock to replace 56' x 360' twin lock chambers at Marmet Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power Added Authorization for Drift & Debris Removal BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 303, 104th Cong. (WRDA '96) H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Congress (WRDA '92) Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 Table 25-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 15. Jul. 14, 1960 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 1, 1980 18. Jun. 28, 1938 19. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13, 1968 21. Oct. 23, 1962 EAST LYNN LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. FISHTRAP LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-18 17. Huntington, WV, District Table 25-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Jul. 14, 1960 24. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25. Oct. 27, 1965 26. Oct. 23, 1962 27. Jun. 28, 1938 28. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 30. Dec. 22, 1944 31. Nov. 17, 1986 32. Oct. 27, 1965 33. Jun. 22, 1936 NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. WEST COLUMBUS, OH Construction of Local Protection Project. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 662, 99th Congr. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 25-19 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 Table 25-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV3 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OIH8 1953 10,951 16,593 'In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 3Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Workclosed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 'Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8Private Law 954, August 31,1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-20 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 --- --- Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 --- --- Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 --- --- Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 --- --- Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 --- --- East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 --- --- Galax, VA 1953 480,536 --- --- Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 --- --- Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 --- --- Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 --- --- Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 --- --- Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 --- --- Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 --- --- Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 --- --- Russell, KY 1953 552,493 --- --- Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 --- --- Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY --- 11,577 --- --- Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 --- --- Vanceburg, KY --- --- --- --- Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 --- --- --- Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 ---- Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA --- 2,656--- Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 --- Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 ------ 25-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 Table 25-G Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH --- May 1981 1,334 --- Athalia, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Belpre, OH --- Nov 1977 --- --- Brooklyn, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- Buena Vista, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chambersburg, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chesapeake, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- Cheshire, OH --- Nov 1977 --- --- Chilo, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Clifton, WV --- Aug 1977 11,237 --- Coal Grove, OH --- Jan 1990 3,389 --- Columbus, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Dover, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Friendly, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Fullerton, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Gallipolis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Greenup, KY --- Jan 1990 4,962 --- Hanging Rock, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Hartford, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Henderson, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Higginsport, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- Hockingport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart Falls, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV --- Nov 1986 17,721 --- Manchester, OH --- May 1981 --- --- Mapleshade, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- Marietta, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- Mason, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Middleport, OH --- May 1981 9,783 --- Miller, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Millwood, WV --- Aug 1977 ---.-- New Martinsville, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- New Matamoras, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- Newport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Normal, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Pomeroy, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Portland, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Proctorville, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- Racine, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Ripley, OH --- Oct 1978 7,523 --- Riverview, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- St. Mary's, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Sardis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Sciotoville, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Sistersville, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- South Point, OH --- Nov 1986 ---.-- South Portsmouth, KY --- Jan 1990 ---.-- Syracuse, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- Waverley, WV --- Aug 1977 ---.-- Williamstown, WV --- Nov 1979 ---.-- Zanesville, OH --- May 1981 ---.-- 25-22 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-G (cont'd) Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 --- Birch, WV --- Nov 1986 --- --- Frazeysburg, OH --- May 1981 5,000 --- Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 --- Logan, OH --- Oct 1985 --- --- Millersburg, OH --- May 1981 --- --- Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 --- Moores Ferry, VA --- Nov 1986 22,879 --- Mud River, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 --- --- Poca, WV --- May 1981 --- --- Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 --- Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 --- Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 --- West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 --- White Oak Creek, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- 25-23 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1999 Table 25-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects (See Section 33 of Text) Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Athens, OH Berwind, WV Bramwell, WV Cairo, WV Canton (Nimishillen), OH Catlettsburg, KY Ceredo-Kenova, WV Chillicothe, OH East Rainelle, WV Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Fourpole Creek, Huntington, WV Galax, VA Grahn,KY Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Hitchins, KY Huntington, WV Inez, KY Ironton, OH Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV Massillon, OH Matewan, WV Maysville, KY Montcalm, WV Mount Vernon, OH Newark, OH Olive Hill, KY Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Parkersburg, WV Pax, WV Point Pleasant, WV Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Prestonsburg, KY Princeton, WV Richwood and Fenwick, WV Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Ripley, WV Roseville, OH Russell, KY Smithfield, WV South Williamson, KY South Williamson (Hospital), KY Spencer, WV Utica, OH West Columbus, OH West Union, Middle Island, WV West Williamson, WV Williamson, WV Aug 99 Jun 99 Nov 99 Nov 99 Nov 99 Sep 99 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED Sep 99 NOT INSPECTED Sep 99 Mar 99 Aug 99 Nov99 NOT INSPECTED May 99 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED Nov 99 NOT INSPECTED Sep 99 Jun 99 NOT INSPECTED Oct 99 Oct 99 Jun 99 Nov 99 Oct 99 Oct 99 Sep 99 Aug 99 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED Mar 99 Oct 99 Sep 99 Sep 99 NOT INSPECTED Oct 99 Jul 99 Nov 99 NOT INSPECTED Sep 99 Nov 99 Nov 99 Sep 99 Sep 99 NOT INSPECTED Sep 99 Nov 99 Nov 99 25-24